📰 报道切片:
本期《Financial Times - 04.11.2026》共收录 113 篇深度报道与评论。重点版面核心议题包括:《美国中期选举:特朗普等待选民裁决》;《英伟达要求减少客户与中国交易以保护美国人工智能领先地位》;《客户难以遵守,因为“在美外地区难以找到足够非中国客户”》;《里奥打击威胁成本上涨的蟾蜍军团》。
📰 报道切片:
📰 报道切片:
📰 报道切片:
星期三 2026年11月4日 21页大篇幅报道:一场价值200亿美元的欺诈如何烧毁了土耳其投资者 UK £3.70;爱尔兰版 €4.10 人工智能泡沫将与以往不同吗? ——马丁·沃夫(Martin Wolf),23页
▶ 便宜连锁店Poundland老板将接受议员质询 美国困境投资者戈登兄弟(Gordon Brothers)将在几天内被召见议员,解释其在折扣零售商即将破产中所扮演的角色。这是高街上规模最大的倒闭之一,将1.2万个工作岗位置于风险之中。—— 第12页 ▶ 推动领导人会晤 官员正讨论本月后期,三国领导人在深圳亚太经合组织(APEC)峰会期间举行会晤的可能性,与会者包括唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)、习近平(Xi Jinping)和普京(Vladimir Putin)。
为什么只拥有一个度假房,而不可以通过结构化共享模式,在欧洲、亚洲和非洲享受豪华住宅的使用权?HIDEAWAYS CLUB [thehideawaysclub.com](http: / thehideawaysclub.com) 该计划的投资仅限于认证的高净值个人或有经验的投资者。
艾伦·利夫西(Alan Livsey)、克里斯·斯迈斯(Chris Smyth)和卡卢姆·卡波尔(Calum Kapoor)——伦敦 私营部门员工将获得自动获得终身养老金收入的权利,政府计划在新方案中撤销之前赋予养老金领取者在退休后对资金自由支配的措施。该变革由劳动与养老保险部(Department for Work and Pensions)于昨日发布的咨询文件中提出,旨在确保老年人在退休后的数年内不会因资金不足而陷入困境。
尽管日本仍保持着世界上部分最低的利率水平,但经济学家预计的利率快速上升将对一个尚未完全接受通胀结束时代的人口产生深远影响。日本银行的主导政策利率已上升至1.25%,这是30年来的最高水平。尽管这仍然远低于年通胀率,但显著的利率上升可能终结银行储蓄(主要由日本老年人持有)的贬值,同时使年轻人购买房产和消费品变得更加困难。
马尔顿·杜奈(MARTON DUNAI) —— 布达佩斯 塞尔维亚当局已逮捕了阿尔塔银行(Alta Bank)的行长,并指控其在亚历山大·武契奇(Aleksandar Vučić)最近的选举失利后,从银行保险柜中提走现金。塞尔维亚警方昨日表示,达沃尔·马库拉(Davor Macura)及另外两名银行官员在银行总部和马库拉家中遭到搜查后被逮捕。
阿尔塔银行的母公司曾因涉嫌洗钱而受到欧洲中央银行(ECB)关注,作为其试图收购奥地利银行阿迪科银行(Addiko)的一部分。ECB质疑该银行是否能验证存款的合法来源,并表示“未发现任何违规行为”。阿尔塔银行曾表示,ECB没有发现任何违规行为。贝尔格莱德刑事辩护律师利利扬娜·博罗维奇(Ljiljana Borovic)表示,阿尔塔银行从贝尔格莱德郊区的一家小外汇兑换所发展成为一家系统性银行,是在其收购一家塞尔维亚国有银行并承接政府业务后实现的。
奥拉夫·斯托贝克 —— 法兰克福 帕奥拉·塔玛 —— 柏林 布鲁塞尔方面给予欧元区21个成员国政府仅数天时间提名下一任欧洲中央银行(ECB)行长候选人,表明寻找克里斯蒂娜·拉加德(Christine Lagarde)接班人的竞争可能将迅速进入白热化阶段。欧盟财政部长理事会主席、希腊财政部长基里亚科斯·皮拉卡基斯(Kyriakos Pierrakakis)呼吁欧元区21个成员国于周五前提交候选人提名,负责协调欧元区政策的机构发言人昨日表示。
澳洲央行今年第五次加息,因通胀持续超目标,经济面临高失业率和房价暴跌压力 尼克·菲尔德斯 —— 悉尼 澳大利亚储备银行(RBA)昨日将利率上调0.25个百分点至4.85%,这是其今年第五次加息,并警告称通胀前景“显著上升”,燃料、大宗商品和AI相关投资推高了价格。
来源:Cotality;FT计算 • * 数据包括布里斯班和黄金海岸。数据截至2026年10月29日 澳大利亚自1980年以来经历了多次房价调整 澳大利亚试图解决房地产危机的措施包括默契理解,即这些措施将导致房价下降,在全球最昂贵的房地产市场中,投资者退出市场。自当局在5月解除促进房地产繁荣的激励措施以来,近6个月来,在通胀上升和利率上调的背景下,影响比预期更为严重。
艾米·卡兹明(Amy Kazmin)——罗马 杰米·约翰(Jamie John)和乔什·斯佩罗(Josh Spero)——伦敦 意大利总理乔尔吉亚·梅洛尼(Giorgia Meloni)提出的“离境税”计划,可能会将过去十年吸引富豪前往米兰等城市的外籍人士驱逐出去,专家警告称。
制药巨头拜耳正在考虑阿波罗集团的贷款。虽然阿波罗集团曾乐意以AI芯片作为抵押提供3500亿美元贷款,但一些竞争对手却不愿跟进这一新兴市场。Ares Management首席执行官迈克尔·阿鲁格蒂(Michael Arougheti)最近告诉股东,该公司避免以AI芯片作为抵押发放贷款,因为他“不知道如何评估这种技术的折旧曲线下降风险”。
一位高级保险律师告诉《金融时报》,3%是“监管机构的魔术数字——无论你将其分成五个不同的[特殊目的实体],都不会有区别”。Security Benefit拒绝说明超过30亿美元的贷款是否构成了其对One Beverly Hills的全部暴露,或者是否已经获得监管机构对这些投资的批准。
维珍媒体O2(Virgin Media O2)今年已流失超过55,000名客户,去年流失了138,400名客户。该宽带提供商雇佣约16,000人。维珍媒体O2将裁减数千人并削减开支,以缓解投资者对其£220亿债务负担的担忧。英国第二大宽带提供商昨日表示,将在2029,,前削减£300万的员工成本(约占总成本的30%),作为更广泛£800万成本削减计划的一部分。
劳拉·奥尼塔 —— 伦敦 联合利华(Unilever)公布了进一步削减€1bn(即100亿欧元)成本和调整运营模式的计划,旨在向投资者证明其食品业务分拆后,能够实现更快的增长。该消费品集团表示,其生产达芙(Dove)肥皂的业务将通过削减“分拆后遗留成本”以及通过“组织简化、流程重设计和技术优化”实现€1bn的生产力节约,计划于2029年底前完成**。
安尔·卡希亚普(Anil Kashyap)市场见解 比特币交易所币安(Binance)的网络盗窃案已经为投资者、监管者和政策制定者提供了多个教训。政策制定者,通过战争演习和压力测试,通常会规划多种金融稳定风险。然而,网络攻击与大多数其他风险不同,它不是问“何时”会发生大型金融机构被入侵,而是问“何时”会发生。
金融生态系统中,缺乏严格监管可能促进创新,但也使得加密公司面临脆弱性。目前,类似于对Binance的攻击可能不会动摇广泛金融体系的信心。但如果加密生态系统继续增长并与传统金融体系深度融合,其影响可能会极其严重。关于网络安全风险的一个真理是:一个组织(或金融体系)的安全性只能与其最薄弱的环节相匹配。
今日市场动态
- 美国股市在中期选举投票日略有上涨,其中科技股从近期的暴跌中反弹。蓝筹股S&P 500指数在纽约早间上涨0.5%,而以科技股为主的纳斯达克100指数上涨0.9%,受半导体股的带动。高通(Advanced Micro Devices)上涨4.9%,英伟达(Nvidia)上涨3.2%,美国芯片股更广泛的费城半导体指数上涨3.3%。
科斯塔斯·穆尔塞拉斯和 伊恩·史密斯 —— 伦敦 阿梅利亚·波拉德 —— 纽约 马歇尔·韦斯和米伦尼姆管理公司是上个月因投资者对AI泡沫可持续性的担忧而受到冲击的对冲基金之一,导致华尔街科技股牛市出现急剧反转。由亿万富翁保罗·马歇尔和伊恩·韦斯共同创立的80亿加元对冲基金马歇尔·韦斯,在10月份其两大核心策略均遭亏损,据知情人士透露。
道琼斯工业平均指数
FTSE 100< / td> <>价格(£)< / > <>周涨跌(%)< / > <>年内涨跌(%)< / > < colspan="4">涨幅股< / >
查看FTSE网站获取更多详情 [www.ftse.com / products / indices / gilts](http: / www.ftse.com / products / indices / gilts)。© 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC。所有权利保留。
所有数据均为上一交易日收盘时的信息。公司分类基于FTSE使用的ICB分类体系。FTSE 100成分股以粗体显示。收盘价格以便士(pence)为单位表示,除非另有说明。最高价和最低价基于过去52周内的日内交易波动。价格 / 收益比(P / E)基于最新年度报告和财务报表,并更新至中期数据。
列出的价格为参考,并相信在出版时为准确。ICE或《金融时报》不提供任何报价。《金融时报》不保证或担保信息的可靠性或完整性。不承担任何因依赖或使用信息而产生的损失的责任。《金融时报》股票服务是一项付费印刷列表服务,可能并未涵盖所有伦敦证券交易所上市公司。该服务可供所有上市公司使用,但需编辑部审核。
<><>基金名称< / >< / > <><>EdenTree可持续英国股权机会基金A类(EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity Opportunities Fund A Inc)< / >< / > <><>ISIN< / >< / > <><>GB0008445982< / >< / > <><>申报价格(2026年30-10-2026)< / >< / >
阿尔特米斯:利润猎手 阿尔格布里斯< / td>< / tr> <><>阿尔格布里斯核心意大利I(欧元)< / ><>€< / ><>236.66< / ><>-< / ><>2.36< / ><>0.00< / ><>25.59< / ><>20.58< / >< / > <><>阿尔格布里斯核心意大利R(欧元)< / ><>€< / ><>218.18< / ><>-< / ><>2.16< / ><>0.00< / ><>24.66< / ><>19.68< / >< / > <><>阿尔格布里斯金融信贷I(欧元)< / ><>€< / ><>226.71< / ><>-< / ><>0.25< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.99< / ><>8.44< / >< / >
<><>蓝鲸增长美元策略(Blue Whale Growth USD T)< / ><>$< / ><>20.73< / ><>-< / ><>-0.85< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
<><>平衡策略(Balanced Strategy)< / ><>£< / ><>1.17< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.43< / ><>10.38< / >< / ><><>平衡策略A(Balanced Strategy A)< / ><>£< / ><>1.17< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>1.84< / ><>7.52< / ><>8.00< / >< / ><><>谨慎平衡策略(Cautious Balanced Strategy)< / ><>£< / ><>1.47< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.91< / ><>8.26< / ><>8.46< / >< / ><><>谨慎平衡策略A(Cautious Balanced Strategy A)< / ><>£< / ><>1.05< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.84< / ><>6.03< / ><>6.69< / >< / ><><>增长策略(Growth Strategy)< / ><>£< / ><>2.64< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.76< / ><>0.53< / ><>4.80< / >< / ><><>增长策略A(Growth Strategy A)< / ><>£< / ><>1.26< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.54< / ><>9.08< / ><>10.00< / >< / ><><>高增长策略(High Growth Strategy GBP)< / ><>£< / ><>3.87< / ><>-< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.24< / ><>12.86< / ><>13.54< / >< / ><><>高增长策略A(High Growth Strategy A)< / ><>£< / ><>1.33< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.52< / ><>10.97< / ><>11.31< / >< / ><><>高收益债券基金B(月度)(High Income Bond Fund B Monthly)< / ><>£< / ><>0.97< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>高收益债券基金B(季度)(High Income Bond Fund B Quarterly)< / ><>£< / ><>0.98< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>美元增长策略(US$ Growth Strategy)< / ><>$< / ><>2.53< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.21< / ><>13.30< / ><>13.90< / >< / table> 交易日常规费用:A类无初始费用,其他类别最高2%。
Candriam投资者集团< / td><>(LUX)< / >< / tr> <>< colspan="8">FCA认可< / >< / > <><>Candriam绝对回报平衡股票市场中性-C类< / ><>€< / ><>229.95< / ><>-< / ><>0.09< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.42< / ><>1.05< / >< / > <><>Candriam债券欧洲高收益资本-C类< / ><>€< / ><>1427.21< / ><>-< / ><>2.06< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.63< / ><>5.39< / >< / > <><>Candriam债券全球高收益-C类< / ><>€< / ><>285.89< / ><>-< / ><>0.34< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.92< / ><>5.16< / >< / >
基金名称 / 货币 / 净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 1年变化 / 3年变化 --------------------------------------- / ---------- / ------------ Emerging Markets Stock Fund A USD Acc / $ / 14.90 / - / 0.06 / 0.00 / 20.82 / 20.29 Emerging Markets Stock Fund A GBP Acc / £ / 15.71 / - / 0.05 / 0.00 / 18.26 / 17.61 Emerging Markets Stock Fund D GBP Dis / £ / 14.15 / - / 0.04 / 1.69 / 15.82 / 15.17
基金名称 / 货币 / 净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 1年变化 / 3年变化 --------------------------------------- / ---------- / ------------ Dodge & Cox Worldwide Times-Global Bond Times EUR Accumulating Class / € / 18.72 / - / -0.01 / 0.00 / 3.98 / 4.55 Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond EUR Accumulating Class (H) / € / 12.06 / - / 0.02 / 0.00 / 3.40 / 3.87 Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond EUR Distributing Class / € / 11.39 / - / -0.01 / 0.00 / -0.89 / -0.28
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund USD Accumulating Share Class / $ / 60.60 / - / 0.39 / 0.00 / 12.30 / 15.07 Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund GBP Accumulating Share Class / £ / 70.28 / - / 0.35 / 0.00 / 9.92 / 12.48 Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund GBP Distributing Share Class / £ / 40.89 / - / 0.21 / 0.00 / 9.09 / 11.59 Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund EUR Accumulating Share Class / € / 70.20 / - / 0.29 / 0.00 / 6.55 / 11.00 Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund USD Distributing Class / $ / 22.17 / - / 0.14 / 0.00 / 11.47 / 14.14
授权投资基金< / td>< / tr><><>埃登树全球影响债券基金(EdenTree Global Impact Bond)< / ><>85.17< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>4.31< / ><>-1.22< / ><>-0.07< / >< / ><><>埃登树绿色影响股权基金(EdenTree Green Impact Equity)< / ><>132.90< / ><>-< / ><>1.30< / ><>0.95< / ><>7.26< / ><>8.73< / >< / ><><>埃登树绿色影响基础设施基金(EdenTree Green Impact Infrastructure)< / ><>78.12< / ><>-< / ><>0.61< / ><>6.75< / ><>-2.66< / ><>-6.13< / >< / table>
请访问 [www.royallondon.com](http: / www.royallondon.com) 获取详情 www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00
受托基金服务(MANAGED FUNDS SERVICE)
<>< colspan="7">授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>基金史密斯股权T账户(Fundsmith Equity T Acc)< / ><>735.71< / ><>-< / ><>7.47< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.53< / ><>4.51< / >< / ><><>基金史密斯股权T收入(Fundsmith Equity T Inc)< / ><>664.02< / ><>-< / ><>6.74< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.28< / ><>14.34< / >< / table> <>< colspan="8">吉尼斯全球投资者(Guinness Global Investors)< / >< / ><><>吉尼斯全球股息收入(GBP分红)(Guinness Global Equity Income Y GBP Dis)< / ><>£< / ><>25.37< / ><>-< / ><>0.13< / ><>2.05< / ><>7.65< / ><>10.78< / >< / ><><>吉尼斯全球创新者(GBP累积)(Guinness Global Innovators Y GBP ACC)< / ><>£< / ><>46.93< / ><>-< / ><>-0.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.91< / ><>18.54< / >< / ><><>吉尼斯全球优质中型企业(GBP累积)(Guinness Global Quality Mid Cap Y Gbp Acc)< / ><>£< / ><>15.83< / ><>-< / ><>0.07< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.84< / ><>10.58< / >< / table>
基金< / td> <>申报价< / > <>要约价< / > <>收益率< / > <>24个月< / >
< ="5">司法部共同投资基金< / > <>(UK)< / > < ="6">英国房地产及其他单位信托< / > <>指数跟踪基金(分红型)< / > <>2626.00< / >
< ="7">授权公司董事-韦斯通管理(英国)有限公司< / > <>全球总体基金PCG A< / > <>689.12< / > <>-0.82< / > <>0.43< / >
普里西马投资基金(CI)有限公司< / td><>(JER)< / >< / tr><><>受监管< / ><>< / >< / ><><>PCG B< / ><>560.07< / ><>-< / ><>-5.19< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.36< / ><>18.80< / >< / ><><>PCG C< / ><>540.19< / ><>-< / ><>-5.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.11< / ><>18.53< / >< / table> <>< colspan="7">授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦可持续多元化A类份额< / ><>281.30< / ><>-< / ><>0.40< / ><>1.55< / ><>3.61< / ><>5.37< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦可持续世界A类份额< / ><>498.30< / ><>-< / ><>-1.90< / ><>0.71< / ><>9.28< / ><>10.60< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦企业债券月收入< / ><>75.64< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>4.64< / ><>-0.35< / ><>0.76< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦欧洲增长信托< / ><>279.70< / ><>-< / ><>-1.00< / ><>1.15< / ><>7.84< / ><>8.73< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦可持续领导者A类份额< / ><>1010.00< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.50< / ><>7.26< / ><>7.08< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦英国增长信托< / ><>872.70< / ><>-< / ><>-0.90< / ><>1.73< / ><>10.51< / ><>10.47< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦英国增长与收入信托< / ><>258.40< / ><>-< / ><>0.20< / ><>4.07< / ><>7.44< / ><>7.77< / >< / ><><>皇家伦敦美国增长信托< / ><>646.10< / ><>-< / ><>-7.50< / ><>0.01< / ><>12.47< / ><>15.90< / >< / table> <>< colspan="7">授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森绝对回报基金A类账户< / ><>207.20< / ><>-< / ><>0.10< / ><>2.10< / ><>5.41< / ><>6.36< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森亚洲股息收入单位信托< / ><>93.76< / ><>-< / ><>-1.36< / ><>5.50< / ><>7.79< / ><>6.53< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森谨慎管理基金A类账户< / ><>355.50< / ><>-< / ><>-0.40< / ><>3.90< / ><>6.19< / ><>7.98< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森谨慎管理基金A类收入< / ><>150.90< / ><>-< / ><>-0.20< / ><>4.00< / ><>2.48< / ><>2.81< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森中国机会基金A类账户< / ><>1212.00< / ><>-< / ><>6.00< / ><>0.10< / ><>10.39< / ><>6.71< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森新兴市场亚洲A类账户< / ><>1607.00< / ><>-< / ><>-32.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>21.55< / ><>18.79< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森新兴市场机会基金A类账户< / ><>266.90< / ><>-< / ><>-5.70< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.39< / ><>10.31< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森欧洲焦点基金A类账户< / ><>573.80< / ><>-< / ><>-1.90< / ><>0.10< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森欧洲选择机会基金A类账户< / ><>3079.00< / ><>-< / ><>-10.00< / ><>0.30< / ><>10.04< / ><>10.73< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森固定收益月收入基金收入< / ><>16.57< / ><>-< / ><>0.02< / ><>6.50< / ><>-1.03< / ><>-1.08< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森全球股票收入基金收入< / ><>84.81< / ><>-< / ><>-0.37< / ><>2.60< / ><>7.66< / ><>7.49< / >< / ><><>简·亨德森全球选择基金账户< / ><>6192.00< / ><>-< / ><>-79.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.91< / ><>12.45< / >< / > Inc< / td><>690.50< / ><>-< / ><>0.70< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.36< / ><>10.81< / >< / tr> <><>Janus Henderson Global Tech Ldrs Fnd A Acc< / ><>6386.00< / ><>-< / ><>-127.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>17.31< / ><>22.29< / >< / >
报价 买入 变动 24 小时收益 36 个月收益 基金名称 / 报价 / 买入 / 变动 / 24 小时收益 / 36 个月收益 ---------------------------------- / ---------------- / ---------- / ------------------ Troy Asset Management (1200) / (UK) | 3 楼,中央广场,威灵顿街,利兹 LS1 4DL | | | | | |
他们称之为“Fonzi”:一场涉及$20亿的金融丑闻,已摧毁了455,000土耳其人的储蓄,激怒了总统雷杰普·塔伊普·埃尔多安,并动摇了其政府的根基。“Fonzi”或“Fonz”是1970年代美国情景喜剧《快乐时光》中穿着皮夹克的英雄角色。但土耳其的“Fonzi”泡沫破裂后,绝无“快乐可言”。
阿利坎·莫尔达尔加是数十万土耳其人之一,他们现在后悔将自己的终身储蓄(他个人的情况是TL600万,折合$120,000)投入了“Fonzi”基金。像许多人一样,他曾看到由人物如53岁的特拉集团(Tera Group)创始人埃姆雷·特兹门(Emre Tezmen)推广的华丽宣传材料。
土耳其,“莫尔达尔加(Mordalga)”表示,“我无法想象有人会认为这样的事情会发生。” 特兹门(Tezmen),其父曾是20世纪90年代土耳其航空公司的董事长,于2005年创立了特拉集团(Tera),并将其打造成一个庞大的金融集团。该集团的经纪公司向潜在投资者展示的回报极为诱人。
土耳其当局现在面临如何最好地清理这场混乱局面的问题。在9月17日,即市场崩盘次日,金融稳定委员会采取了一系列紧急协调措施,包括冻结交易、清算总资产达$20亿的131只基金,以及由中央银行增加里拉流动性以限制强制性抛售。财政部长希姆谢克表示:“我们已经将有问题的领域置于‘检疫’状态”,并补充称,这仅占土耳其投资基金部门的10%,并不是系统性威胁。
欺诈和投机泡沫与金融业一样古老。1720年的南海泡沫——历史上最臭名昭著的庞氏骗局之一——仅在英国议会通过所谓的《泡沫法案》(意图遏制投机过度)数月后就破裂了。爱德华·钱德勒尔(Edward Chancellor)是《魔鬼抢走最后一分钱》(Devil Take the Hindmost)一书作者,该书是一部金融投机史,他表示:“**‘泡沫’一词最初的含义就是欺诈。
信贷冬天尚未完全到来,但随着秋叶飘落,AI投资热潮的环境确实变得越来越寒冷。谷歌母公司阿尔法贝特(Alphabet)、Meta和甲骨文(Oracle)本周回到债券市场,发行数十亿加元的额外债券以获取芯片和数据中心的资金,加剧了今年已估计高达约5000亿加元的此类借贷热潮。然而,超大型云服务商(hyperscalers)现在支付的成本明显高于数月前,当时似乎AI支出增长以满足计算需求仍有很长的路要走。
给摄影编辑的一个词。报道《丰田准备释放其人型机器人》(报道,11月2日)中包含了一张照片,根据《金融时报》印刷版的图片说明,“一台丰田机器人在打篮球”。这纯属人格投射,并且是对将人类品质归因于机器的一种令人不安的趋势的证明。我们是否需要被提醒,**机器人不会“玩”?
马丁·沃尔夫经济学 投资热潮持续的时间越长,其结束时带来的负面影响可能就越大。人工智能有许多——大多尚未完全被理解——对人类的影响。其中之一是一个具体且当下的问题:它引发了对物理资本的巨大投资热潮,以满足对大型数据中心的需求。据哥伦比亚商学院的斯蒂恩·范·纽韦布鲁赫(Stijn van Nieuwerburgh)撰写的一篇引人入胜的论文《“Financing the AI Buildout”》显示,美国的投资规模将从2025年到2032年(含)平均占GDP的3.6%。
然而,范·纽韦尔堡补充道,芯片设计商、云服务提供商、数据中心运营商以及基础设施投资者通过长期合同、战略投资和融资安排日益相互依赖,这进一步加剧了系统的脆弱性。这些问题不仅仅是AI行业内部的问题。这轮投资热潮规模巨大,对宏观经济产生了重大影响。美国联邦储备委员会的一份报告指出,计算机硬件、软件和数据中心的支出在今年第一季度对美国季度环比GDP增长贡献超过1个百分点,但同时这些类别的净进口增加也拉低了GDP增长0.5个百分点。
以及奴隶制,特别是后者。当然,这里的目的并非是要将当今时代与大西洋奴隶贸易的恐怖相提并论。但奴隶社会和奴隶贸易的历史告诉我们,现代社会中那些被认为是约束“合理”或“可能性”的“防护栏”实际上是多么脆弱。最近的历史研究,如《英国奴隶贸易商名录》以及同名威廉·佩蒂格鲁(William Pettigrew)的著作,展示了如何将超过1200万非洲人从家园拆散并置于奴役状态,背后涉及金融创新和新的物流体系;国家权力不仅支持奴隶贸易,还围绕其重新构建;文化生产和媒体则宣扬了一种新的国家创新与赋权神话;经济论证则被奴隶贸易中的“特许垄断”或“自由贸易”问题所驱动。
米兰维多利亚·埃马努埃莱二世大道是奢侈品购物者的热门地点 —— 梦想时光 如果你是一位非常富有且全球流动性强的个人,正在考虑在哪里安营扎寨,你可能会密切关注两个 截然相反的财政趋势。一方面,有加利福尼亚州及其同类,担忧社会不平等的影响,并试图征收财富税。另一方面,有像希腊这样的国家,希望吸引超级富豪 —— 包括英国基金经理克里斯·罗科斯 —— 以优惠条款,希望财富能够滴滴溢下。
英国最大的银行之一——国家西部银行(NatWest)发现,一些疫情期间形成的习惯难以摆脱。上个月,银行员工在被要求花费更多时间在办公室时提出了抱怨。虽然顾客可能对一些封锁时期的爱好(如腌制蔬菜或制作黑麦面包)的热情有所降温,但一些金融习惯却保留了下来。例如,储蓄。一组上升的家庭储蓄率表明,英国消费者正在保留更多收入,并更加关注如何存放额外的现金。
选民昨天在南卡罗来纳州韦斯特科伦比亚投票。5900万张选票在之前已通过邮寄方式投出,这表明当天的投票率可能会很高。投票时间从美国东部时间6点开始关闭,首批结果将在关闭后不久出现,并持续到西部地区投票结束时的清晨。此外,还有36场州长选举和政策议题投票,例如加利福尼亚州的财富税提案。
- 芯片制造商限制云服务商 - 大多数合作伙伴必须与非中国客户签约 - 对北京科技目标的重大打击 朱京(Zijing Wu)——香港 德米特里·塞瓦斯托普洛(Demetri Sevastopulo)——华盛顿
每个云服务商都试图在美国基础设施上建设,并争取全球业务,英伟达表示。美国长期以来的政策一直支持在全球范围内建设美国基础设施,将繁荣、影响力和就业机会带回国内。英伟达在今年夏季实施这一要求,旨在减少来自美国国会议员和其他批评者对其对华政策的批评,据两名知情人士透露。美国正试图打击帮助中国黑市购买英伟达芯片的中间商,以及通过海外租赁协议限制中国公司获取先进芯片的途径。
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026 编号:42,399 ★ 印刷地点:伦敦、利物浦、格拉斯哥、都柏林、法兰克福、米兰、马德里、纽约、芝加哥、旧金山、东京、香港、新加坡、首尔、杜拜 9770307176135 ### 股市行情
德米特里·塞瓦斯托普洛(Demetri Sevastopulo) —— 华盛顿 马克·塞顿(Max Seddon) —— 柏林 乔·利希(Joe Leahy) —— 北京 美国、中国和俄罗斯官员正在讨论,在本月中国深圳举办的亚太经济合作组织(APEC)峰会期间,唐纳德·特朗普、习近平和弗拉基米尔·普京三方领导人可能举行会晤。
阿赫梅德·阿尔·奥马兰 —— 吉达 原定于明年早些时候在沙特举行的亚洲杯足球赛事已被延期,随着中东地区伊朗与美国、以色列冲突再度升级,沙特正在应对新一轮紧张局势。亚足联(AFC)周一确认,该赛事将推迟至2027年12月举行,这是自耶门胡塞武装袭击里亚德机场及其他民用和能源基础设施以来,连续取消或推迟的赛事之一。
哈里·德姆普西 —— 东京 斯蒂芬妮·芬德莱 —— 休斯敦 马尔科姆·穆尔 —— 伦敦 日本企业自2023年以来展开全球规模的21亿加元投资潮,以加强对天然气供应的控制,应对中东和乌克兰冲突引发的市场动荡。这些投资主要集中在美国墨西哥湾沿岸的页岩资源上,支持日本的能源安全战略,并与唐纳德·特朗普推动美国能源主导地位的目标相辅相成。
吴子京、威廉·桑德兰 中国监管机构已指示银行暂停公司上市和大规模股权出售,以振兴中国遭遇困境的股票市场。中国证监会(CSRC)在过去几天内与投资银行举行了会议,并给出了非正式指导(或“窗口指引”),要求暂停初次公开募股(IPO)。根据三名知情人士透露,现有股东的大规模股权出售也已暂时中止,直到市场恢复。
FTSE 欧洲首选指数 日变化 ↗ 0.52% / 月变化 ↘ -1.88% / 年变化 ↗ 10.59% Nasdaq Composite / 纽约 IPC / 日变化 ▼ -0.69% / 月变化 ▲ 0.51% / 年变化 ▲ 29.43% 墨西哥城 / 64531.68 / 70603.90
里奥钛集团(Rio Tinto)正加入打击澳大利亚最具侵略性物种之一的行动,以遏制其对野生动物造成的破坏。这家矿业集团将投入$20(即2000万加元),与科学家合作,在澳大利亚北部的40公里×400公里区域建立一片“清除区”,以对付入侵的蟾蜍军团。这些蟾蜍一世纪前被引入以消灭食用甘蔗的甲虫,但最终吞噬了所有物种。
随着各国加紧升级数字防务,关键AI基础设施正成为新的前线。重新思考防御策略,访问 [LombardOdier.com](http: / LombardOdier.com) 洛桑·奥迪尔 洛桑·奥迪尔·达里埃·亨施 PRIVATE BANKING ASSET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY 公司债务水平保持低位
德米特里·塞瓦斯托普洛 —— 华盛顿 乔治·哈蒙德 —— 旧金山 开放式人工智能(OpenAI)公司聘请了前美国陆军部长丹·德里斯科尔(Dan Driscoll),他曾因与国防部长佩特·赫格塞斯(Pete Hegseth)的紧张关系而辞职。随着美国试图扩大人工智能在国家和网络安全领域的应用,这一招聘被视为军方的重要举措。
- 工程师被诱骗安装恶意软件 - $6.3亿美元盗窃案涉及多种技术手段 尼库·阿斯加里 —— 伦敦 吉尔·R·沙 —— 纽约 比特币交易所(Binance)表示,上周盗走$6.3亿美元的攻击者通过设置假面试来诱骗公司的一名软件工程师安装恶意代码,并公布了对这起盗窃案的调查结果。
私募资本集团第三季度贷款规模增长超过50% 安东尼·加拉 —— 纽约 阿波罗全球(Apollo Global)在第三季度贷款规模达到创纪录的114亿加元,将其保险客户的保费资金大量投入AI融资热潮,速度日益加快。总部位于纽约的私募资本集团贷款规模较第二季度增长超过50%,其中包括为人工智能公司Anthropic安排的芯片融资交易,以及为芯片制造商英伟达(Nvidia)安排的500亿加元融资努力。
迈克尔·阿克顿 —— 旧金山 苹果警告称,记忆芯片价格“史无前例”的上涨以及为其AI工具提供服务的成本将挤压其利润,尽管公司预计在关键的圣诞季销售将超过预期。苹果股价在昨天午间交易中下跌近2.5%,因为公司警告称组件成本上升并给出了高端服务业务前景较弱的预测。苹果还预计今年第四季度的毛利率将为45%至46%,低于分析师预测的47%。
内维利娜·亚历山德罗娃(Nevelina Aleksandrova),公共科学图书馆(PLOS)首席工程师 萨姆里恩·阿什拉夫(Dr Samreen Ashraf),博恩茅斯大学商学院副院长 纳森·阿特金森(Nathan Atkinson),Rethink Food CIC联合创始人 苏罗什·阿齐兹(Surosh Azizi),盖拉德公司(Gailarde)财务总监 特莎·贝克(Tessa Baker),波特兰大学宇宙学与引力研究所教授
拉切尔·米拉德 Drax和布鲁克菲尔德宣布,将在英格兰北约克郡Drax的生物质发电厂建设大型数据中心,并获得卡塔尔投资支持。该计划可能使Drax的生物质发电厂在下个十年为AI模型提供电力,但初期电力将来自现有电网连接。英国能源集团Drax和加拿大基础设施投资者布鲁克菲尔德表示,双方将合作,力争在2028,,前建成100兆瓦的数据中心容量,2031年扩大至500兆瓦,并在2030年代达到1吉瓦。
尼库·阿斯加里 —— 伦敦 分析师表示,尽管北朝鲜黑客团伙使用了复杂的自动化手段隐藏踪迹,但预计他们将需要数月时间来洗涤上周从加密货币交易所币安盗取的数十亿美元代币。美国联邦调查局(FBI)将此次盗窃事件归咎于TraderTraitor黑客团伙,该团伙与秘密国家有关联,称预计盗取的资产将在被兑现前广泛洗涤。
< rowspan="2" colspan="2">价格 ± 日变化< / > < colspan="2">52周< / > < ="2">收益率< / > < ="2">市盈率< / > < ="2">成交量(千股)< / >
< / td>< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">日涨跌幅< / >< colspan="4">52周< / >< rowspan="2">成交量(千股)< / >< / tr><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">航空航天与国防< / >< / ><><>Cohort< / ><>1362.00< / ><>-28.00< / ><>1538.00< / ><>881.10< / ><>1.31< / ><>26.08< / ><>166.61< / >< / ><><>Velocity Composites< / ><>13.50< / ><>-0.75< / ><>22.00< / ><>12.00< / ><>—< / ><>-6.75< / ><>1.76< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">基本资源(不含采矿业)< / >< / ><><>Cropper J< / ><>815.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>840.00< / ><>250.00< / ><>—< / ><>26.46< / ><>6.56< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">建筑与材料< / >< / ><><>Accsys Tech< / ><>55.00< / ><>1.80< / ><>79.84< / ><>52.20< / ><>—< / ><>24.69< / ><>25.40< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">电子与电气设备< / >< / ><><>Checkit< / ><>14.50< / ><>—< / ><>27.00< / ><>13.99< / ><>—< / ><>-5.58< / ><>12.06< / >< / ><><>LPA< / ><>82.00< / ><>—< / ><>92.00< / ><>34.00< / ><>—< / ><>-31.06< / ><>—< / >< / ><><>Thorpe FW< / ><>277.00< / ><>10.00< / ><>320.00< / ><>240.00< / ><>2.65< / ><>11.68< / ><>80.84< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">金融(一般)< / >< / ><><>Arbuthnot Banking< / ><>810.00< / ><>—< / ><>940.00< / ><>755.00< / ><>6.79< / ><>7.42< / ><>7.38< / >< / table> <>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">日涨跌幅< / >< colspan="4">52周< / >< rowspan="2">分红溢价(-)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>净资产价值(NAV)< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">传统(不含私募股权)< / >< / ><><>3i Infra< / ><>395.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>389.50< / ><>325.00< / ><>3.41< / ><>406.49< / ><>-3.68< / >< / ><><>Abf GVIT< / ><>94.00< / ><>0.75< / ><>96.77< / ><>76.00< / ><>6.49< / ><>110.31< / ><>-15.76< / >< / ><><>Abf Sml< / ><>1900.00< / ><>-8.00< / ><>1926.00< / ><>1408.07< / ><>2.52< / ><>2105.14< / ><>-9.68< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Asia Foc< / ><>404.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>478.00< / ><>348.00< / ><>1.59< / ><>433.05< / ><>-8.44< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Asian Inc Fund< / ><>287.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>357.00< / ><>246.00< / ><>6.93< / ><>305.94< / ><>-7.89< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Eq Inc< / ><>453.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>473.00< / ><>359.25< / ><>5.10< / ><>457.46< / ><>-1.82< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen UK Smll< / ><>545.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>551.00< / ><>441.50< / ><>—< / ><>573.81< / ><>-5.24< / >< / ><><>Alliance Witan< / ><>1349.00< / ><>-9.00< / ><>1412.03< / ><>1178.00< / ><>2.17< / ><>1417.67< / ><>-4.74< / >< / ><><>Allianz Tech< / ><>646.00< / ><>-9.00< / ><>789.00< / ><>484.48< / ><>—< / ><>694.65< / ><>-8.00< / >< / ><><>Artemis UK Future Lead< / ><>399.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>407.00< / ><>321.00< / ><>3.87< / ><>462.64< / ><>-12.58< / >< / ><><>Aurora UK Alpha< / ><>259.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>279.00< / ><>222.09< / ><>1.81< / ><>294.49< / ><>-10.95< / >< / ><><>AVI Japan< / ><>174.50< / ><>0.50< / ><>194.00< / ><>154.50< / ><>1.26< / ><>185.53< / ><>-2.92< / >< / ><><>BG China Growth< / ><>269.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>331.04< / ><>263.00< / ><>0.93< / ><>300.09< / ><>-10.77< / >< / ><><>BG Euro< / ><>122.00< / ><>-1.50< / ><>133.00< / ><>91.40< / ><>0.59< / ><>138.02< / ><>-11.16< / >< / ><><>BG Japan< / ><>1032.00< / ><>-8.00< / ><>1114.00< / ><>811.10< / ><>0.97< / ><>1149.18< / ><>-10.17< / >< / ><><>BG Shin< / ><>167.80< / ><>-0.40< / ><>182.00< / ><>123.05< / ><>0.41< / ><>185.08< / ><>-9.66< / >< / ><><>BG US< / ><>—< / ><>< / >< / > < / table> 成长< / td> 348.50< / ><>-4.00< / ><>398.00< / ><>263.00< / ><>[...OMITTED...]< / ><>380.42< / ><>-7.49< / >< / tr> < rowspan="2" colspan="2">价格 / 日变化< / >
您的社论《AI热潮的对冲局限》(10月28日,《金融时报观点》)讨论了投资者如何保护其投资组合免受AI衰退的影响。推动这一热潮的大部分资金流向了芯片、数据中心和电力,因此这些基础设施的回报不仅对其所有者,还对供应商、贷方以及其所有者至关重要。但即使AI需求持续增长,这些回报也可能面临压力:新技术可能在设备尚未偿还成本前就使现有设备失去竞争力。
保守党正邀请前首相戴维·卡梅伦(Lord David Cameron)召集支持者并提振筹款活动,此人在党内活动中被安排为头牌。卡梅伦曾在2010年大选中将保守党推上执政宝座,据知情人士透露,他还经常与现任党首凯米·巴登诺奇(Kemi Badenoch)会面。
德尔芬·施特劳斯 英国工人在过去10年内越来越不热衷于工作,且不再愿意为了雇主付出额外努力,根据英国社会态度调查(British Social Attitudes)的数据分析显示,这种“静默离职”现象在疫情后导致生产力下滑。该调查由解决基金会(Resolution Foundation)智库进行分析,并发布于昨日。
经济、社会和政治动荡预计将伴随人口数量快速增长期结束 高迁移:每年净迁入人口455,000人; 低迁移:每年净迁入人口105,000人; 主要预测:每年净迁入人口230,000人,长期生育率1.42; 高生育变体:长期生育率1.62;
在春季,英国国家统计局(Office for National Statistics)预测,英国人口将在2054年达到峰值,增长完全由每年净增23万人的移民驱动。但如果按照英国财政部(OBR)最新的移民预测调整这些预测,情况则截然不同:人口将仅微幅增长,并在2030年代中期(约2030年)达到峰值。
德尔菲娜·施特劳斯(Delphine Strauss)和大卫·谢帕德(David Sheppard) 英国内政大臣沙巴娜·马胡德(Shabana Mahmood)放弃了让外籍护理工作者延长获得英国永久居留权的计划——但这一让步仅仅是软化了一个仍然是移民体系重大改革的边缘。
国际学生特别是可能面临更大的障碍,未来在英国定居。政府已经废除了“长期居留”途径,该途径曾允许他们在10年内(包括临时学习和毕业签证的时间)获得永久居留权。由于签证规则已经比过去严格得多,未来来英国工作的许多人将是高税率纳税人,能在五年后获得永久居留权,IPPR智库的副总裁马利·莫里斯(Marley Morris)表示。
这尚待观察。新规则使许多获得难民身份的移民难以在英国获得长期居留权,特别是如果他们通过小船途径抵达。这可能会减少移民尝试从法国乘坐“小船”抵达英国的动力。未通过政府正式安置计划抵达英国的难民申请者,需要等待20年才能获得永久居留权,但如果他们进入“持续”工作或学习,这一时间可以缩短至10年。
英国估计这些改革将使福利开支减少数十亿英镑。但内政部(Home Office)尚未公布影响评估报告。分析师表示,声称改革将带来巨大财政收益的说法从一开始就被夸大了,尤其是在向护理工作者做出让步后,后者被视为对纳税人构成最大潜在风险。这是因为,虽然改革推迟了人们申领工作年龄福利的时间点,但移民的最大财政成本出现在后期,即移民子女在学校就读期间以及人们退休时。
地理位置在物流中至关重要,从伦敦港口(London Gateway)16座高塔中的一座中间层俯瞰,可以看到泰晤士河一侧,一座巨型Tesco配送中心在远处拔地而起,而第五个货轮泊位正在建设中。不久,它将成为英国最大的集装箱港口。大多数港口都是历史悠久的,但伦敦港口是新建的。它位于泰晤士河口北岸,距离首都东部25英里处,原本是一家壳牌石油炼厂的旧址,于2010年开始建设。
www.asbc.com< / td>< / tr><><>ASB SUKUK - ACC< / ><>$ 102.51< / ><>-< / ><>0.09< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB SUKUK - DIST< / ><>$ 94.61< / ><>-< / ><>0.08< / ><>0.50< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB State Street Global Equity< / ><>$ 124.40< / ><>-< / ><>1.89< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB Global Technology< / ><>$ 154.95< / ><>-< / ><>-2.54< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB MENA Equity< / ><>$ 92.32< / ><>-< / ><>0.86< / ><>0.00< / >< / table> <>< colspan="7">其他国际基金< / >< / ><><>American Dynamic< / ><>$ 9374.01< / ><>-< / ><>150.98< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>American One< / ><>$ 11153.21< / ><>-< / ><>-74.45< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.31< / ><>14.44< / >< / ><><>Bond Global< / ><>€ 1670.42< / ><>-< / ><>4.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.19< / ><>8.28< / >< / ><><>Eurocroissance< / ><>€ 1401.92< / ><>-< / ><>34.86< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Far East< / ><>$ 1218.80< / ><>-< / ><>5.56< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
西蒙·曼迪(Simon Mundy)在《道德金融》(Moral Money,10月23日)中警告铜供应短缺是正确的。然而,可信的解决方案确实存在,如果正确利用,可以加速朝循环经济的进程。铜非常适合循环利用,其重点在于减少生产需求和最小化浪费,而非增加产量。这种金属可以无限次循环利用,而不会失去其核心性能。
杰米娅·凯利(Jemima Kelly)在轻率地否定记者和广播人蒂姆·斯坦利(Tim Stanley)的警告时,认为英国即将爆发内战(题为《英国右翼对“内战”的迷恋》,评论,10月26日),是有些不公平的。斯坦利以及其他一些在报刊和互联网上发表类似观点的人,正像克雷恩·布里顿(Crane Brinton)在其1938年经典著作《革命的解剖》中所描述的那样,“职业先知和胆小的保守派”,执行着西方社会知识分子的“伟大功能”,即“[namely] 将普通人从无思考的乐观主义中唤醒”,**“卡桑德拉或许与柏拉图一样,有资格被视为一门伟大学术传统的创始人。
纸质版与线上版:[www.ft.com / subscribenow](http: / www.ft.com / subscribenow) 电话订阅:0800 028 1407
2026年9月—11日 奥尔多瓦斯(ORDOVAS) [ORDOVASART.COM](http: / ORDOVASART.COM)
法案将为项目设定法律义务,为社区提供资金 吉姆·皮卡德(Jim Pickard)和雷切尔·米拉德(Rachel Millard) 可再生能源公司将被法律强制要求在项目所在地投资社区,以便在气候变化政策政治共识分裂之际,提振公众对“净零”目标的支持。社区还将获得购买附近可再生能源项目20%股份的权利(目前为5%),并首次适用于规模至少为1兆瓦的小型项目。
彼得·坎贝尔、巴尼·乔普森、拉法埃尔·明德和劳拉·杜博瓦 七架客机在欧洲因接连在短时间内收到爆炸威胁而被迫降落并进行搜查。当局表示,这些事件被证实为虚假威胁,但分析师警告航空公司应做好未来数日可能面临更多威胁的准备,这些威胁可能是协调一致的企图,旨在干扰该地区的航空运输。
李·哈里斯 —— 伦敦 安东尼·加拉 —— 纽约 马克·沃尔特正在探讨出售其旗下资产总值为71亿美元的保险公司德拉瓦人寿保险公司(Delaware Life),这一举动发生在联邦调查其亿万富翁投资帝国之后。据三名知情人士透露,沃尔特正在考虑出售该保险公司,这一交易可能是其持有公司TWG Global更广泛重组计划的一部分。
伊凡·莱文斯顿 —— 伦敦 卡莱尔集团(Carlyle)和PAI集团同意将妇女健康业务泰拉梅克斯(Theramex)以2.6亿欧元的价格出售给私募股权集团辛文(Cinven),这一交易价值几乎是四年前这两家并购集团以约1.4亿欧元收购该公司时的两倍。卡莱尔和PAI于2022年收购了总部位于伦敦的泰拉梅克斯,该公司专注于更年期、骨质疏松等领域。
帕特里克·坦普尔-韦斯特 —— 纽约 辉瑞(Pfizer)因非新冠药物需求强劲,特别是癌症治疗药物和一款热销的抗凝血药物,提升了利润和收入预期,从而部分抵消了美国药企新冠疫苗产品销售下滑的影响。在昨日公布的第三季度业绩中,总部位于纽约的辉瑞表示,预计全年销售额将达到620亿加元至640亿加元,较之前的预测指引605亿加元至625亿加元有所上调,主要得益于非新冠药物收入的增长。
关怀与领导力 他指出,此类设备应运行在“一个虚拟网络中,其中系统仅能在有限空间内通信”,并指出在缺乏大型网络安全预算和技术专业知识的行业中,显然存在挑战。“总是有成本。您需要配置它,还需要维护它。” 比利时网络安全中心(Centre for Cybersecurity)负责人米格尔·德布鲁伊克(Miguel De Bruycker)建议,零售、制造和公共事业等行业的公司应避免将工业设备连接到公开互联网。
我们鼓励今天和明天的领导者,无论其角色或背景如何,以#关怀领导力(LeadWithKindness)为己任。李·哈里斯(Lee Harris) 托德·博伊利(Todd Boehly)的保险公司已累积超过30亿加元的贷款,用于其正在开发的加利福尼亚州贝弗利山庄(Beverly Hills)房地产项目,这突显了该投资者利用保单持有人资金来融资其更广泛帝国的做法。
高盛兄弟集团高管将被召见议员质询 吉姆·皮卡德 政治编辑助理 便宜连锁店(Poundland)的业主高盛兄弟集团(Gordon Brothers)将在数日内被召至议员面前解释其在该折扣零售商即将破产中的角色。议会商业特别委员会(Business Select Committee)昨日决定召见来自困境投资者高盛兄弟集团的高管进行质询。
经济停滞不前,照旧做我们一直做的事,已经不是一个可行的选择,他说道。《金融时报》在9月份报道称,VMO2的所有者计划削减数亿英镑的成本,以缓解投资者对公司财务的担忧。昨日,VMO2在公布第三季度业绩时宣布了这些削减措施,报告显示该公司在7月至9月期间失去了23,000名宽带客户。
劳拉·奥尼塔和阿什利·阿姆斯特朗 阿斯达集团已任命前竞争对手莫里斯森斯(Wm Morrison)首席执行官大卫·波茨(David Potts)为新任首席执行官,以扭转英国第三大超市的颓势。波茨昨日立即加入位于莱德斯的零售商,接替资深零售业老手阿兰·莱顿(Allan Leighton),后者将成为非执行董事会主席,在近两年领导该业务后离任。
“顾客想要什么,我就告诉《金融时报》。”波茨告诉《金融时报》。这一消息出现在英国激烈竞争的零售业中合并风潮加剧之际。《金融时报》上个月报道称,赛百味(Sainsbury's)和莫里斯森(Morrisons)今年曾进行合并谈判,但前者最终退出。行业高管表示,阿斯达(Asda)与莫里斯森(Morrisons)合并的可能性也不应被排除。
这项交易预计将于明年上半年完成,但该交易在今年3月宣布时,投资者反应冷淡。费尔南德斯随后承诺打造一个“更精明、更聚焦”的集团,以美妆、个人护理和家居护理为核心。联合利华昨日表示,公司将遵循“全球战略、本地执行”的原则,并将重点放在简化业务流程上。一个“精简”的中央职能部门将由更负责任的本地团队补充,后者对其绩效负责。
尼克·菲尔德斯 —— 悉尼 壳牌将其在澳大利亚最大天然气田的股份出售给阿布扎比国家石油公司(阿迪诺克)的投资部门,交易金额为14.5亿加元,这是壳牌剥离成熟资产的一部分。这家英荷石油巨头昨日表示,已同意将其在北西海岸项目(North West Shelf)的16.7%股份出售给阿迪诺克的能源投资部门XRG。
利润。能量。政治。当前价格 / 日变化 / 最高价 / 最低价 / 52周最高 / 52周最低 ------------------- / ---------- / -------- / ---------- CT PrivEq / 467.00 / -1.00 / 592.00 / 439.84 / 691.09 / -32.56 HGCapital / 392.50 / -1.50 / 512.00 / 318.64 / 530.50 / -25.54
3楼,中央广场,威灵顿街,利兹 LS1 4DL 订单与咨询电话:0345 601 9610 基金名称 / 单位净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 3年平均年化收益率 --------------------------------------- / -------------- / ------------- / --------------------------- | Waystone管理(英国)有限公司 | | | | | | |
当今年年度联合国气候大会(COP31)下周在土耳其城市安塔利亚开幕时,请做好准备,将会有大量关于一个看似并不枯燥的主题的讨论:电力。大会主办方希望各国政府支持一个新目标:将电力在最终能源需求中的占比从目前的约20%提升至2035.的35%。换句话说,他们希望更多汽车使用电池而非汽油,更多家庭使用电热泵而非天然气锅炉。
在危机中,比如今年伊朗的战争所展示的那样。但即使没有这样的动荡,国际能源署估计,如果这些国家提高电气化水平,到2035年,进口账单可能会减少超过$400亿加元每年。虽然需要大量前期投资,但电力技术的运营成本更低,这意味着到2035年全球电费可能会降低。电力还能减少排放,尤其是如果电力来自可再生能源。
我们还需要再次听到爱尔兰所谓脆弱的经济奇迹的故事吗?朱德·韦伯(Jude Webber)的《大阅读》文章《为什么富裕的爱尔兰仍然感觉贫穷》(11月2日)重复了熟悉的套路:房价高昂、基础设施不足、对跨国公司的依赖、波动的企业所得税,以及爱尔兰非凡繁荣可能突然消失的前景。这些都是熟悉的问题。
阿里亚·希布利(Aliya Shibli)的报告显示,选择出售而非扩张的创业者人数已连续八年达到高位(金融时报《金融时报财经》,10月24日),这不会让支持中小企业的人感到意外。英国私营部门中约60%的员工,即约1100万人,在小型和中型企业(SMEs)中工作,这些企业定义为雇员不超过250人的企业。
对于欧洲旅客来说,廉价航班的黄金时代即将结束:航班数量减少,票价上涨。航空公司试图抵消高油价对利润造成的破坏。虽然许多航空公司在讨论成本削减,但乘客也将承担一部分负担。廉价航空面临最严峻的挑战。廉价航空冠军瑞安航空(Ryanair)周一公布了可能的成本削减计划,希望缓解其明年燃油成本增加€2的影响。
2 坚定的共产主义信念(5) 3 在沙发上舒服时,我能继续吃(9) 4 不幸的是,错过了收获时节,没有萝卜(4,2,6) 6 访问亲戚时,轮流参观著名广场(5) 7 详细扭曲的基督教说教(9)
在该党最受欢迎的议员辞职后, 支持对手辛费恩党(Sinn Féin)的声势日益高涨 朱德·韦伯(Jude Webber) —— 都柏林 北爱尔兰最大的亲英党正面临压力, 试图避免进一步分裂,因为该党最受欢迎的议员
彼得·福斯特、乔治·帕克和安迪·鲍恩斯 英国首相安迪·伯恩汉姆(Andy Burnham)承诺的“重启”协议与布鲁塞尔(欧盟)的谈判,可能不会在20日的欧盟-英国关键峰会上获得最终批准,因为欧盟要求英国首先就欧盟学生进入英国大学的学费问题达成协议。一份正在由欧盟官员起草的联合声明草案显示,虽然讨论中的多项议题(如食品贸易壁垒、碳市场联网和青年流动计划)可能会在11月20日的会议上完成谈判,但这些协议的实施将取决于英国降低欧盟学生的学费。
无人机和导弹袭击电厂和变电站,冬季前俄方加剧空中攻势 法布里斯·德普雷兹 —— 基辅 俄罗斯大规模无人机和导弹袭击昨晚在乌克兰全境对能源基础设施发动攻击,莫斯科在冬季到来前加紧致命空中战役。根据乌克兰当局,超过10多个能源设施在9个地区遭到袭击。乌克兰空军报告仅拦截了莫斯科发射的17枚俄制弹道导弹中的3枚,凸显基辅严重缺乏防空拦截器。
无人机和导弹警报在华沙提升警戒级别后,该地区神经紧绷 拉斐尔·明德尔(Raphael Minder)——卢布林 在波兰东部旅游胜地卢布林,以其中世纪城门和粉色建筑群闻名,当地居民已经习惯了空袭警报和战斗机应对俄罗斯无人机或导弹威胁时的轰鸣声。自9月初以来,当地居民一直收到关于可能遭遇俄罗斯空中入侵的短信警报。
艾米·麦金农 —— 华盛顿 詹姆斯·肖特 —— 耶路撒冷 唐纳德·特朗普表示,美国将于2028年前停止向以色列提供军事援助,称该国“已经不再需要”这笔援助,并称此举是“在选民赴选举投票前的一个糟糕话题”。特朗普昨天上午表示:“为什么我们要忍受像埃尔-赛义德这样的疯子的攻击,而以色列人不需要(援助)?
赫巴·萨利赫 —— 开罗 联合国维和部队正在结束为期35年的西撒哈拉任务,因为安理会未能续任其授权,分析师警告称这可能导致摩洛哥和阿尔及利亚之间爆发公开冲突。该任务的授权于周日到期,安理会在周五陷入僵局,美国和俄罗斯分别提出了相互冲突的决议草案,均未获通过。俄罗斯否决了美国提出的决议草案,该草案将使联合国任务无法组织长期搁浅的西撒哈拉自决公投,实际上将主权授予摩洛哥,后者已实际控制该领土大部分地区。
情报机构驱动的加密货币黑客事件增加,揭示了区块链技术的脆弱性。币安的调查结果还凸显了人为错误在允许黑客进入交易所系统中的显著作用。该公司表示,今年6月,一名工程师下载了一个被篡改的软件程序。虽然币安的系统检测到了此事,并更换了该工程师的设备,但“工程师的角色及其相关同事在钱包基础设施团队中已被黑客暴露”。
欧盟官员权衡如何防止进一步事件发生,在未知黑客破坏价值数百万欧元超市冷藏库存后 TOM WILSON —— 伦敦 LAURA DUBOIS —— 布鲁塞尔 周一,欧洲数十家超市的冷库遭到黑客袭击,这是本月第二次此类“冷库黑客”事件,调查人员质疑谁会针对大陆冻品食品发动如此神秘的网络攻击之一。
艺术市场 / 查尔斯顿 —— 查尔斯顿(Sussex郡的艺术家家园)正在启动一项£15百万(£15mn)的筹款活动,以配合布卢姆斯伯里集团在英国艺术界的文化复兴。首笔£1百万(£1mn)的捐款来自作家维吉尼亚·尼古拉斯(Virginia Nicholson)——画家范妮莎·贝尔(Vanessa Bell)的外孙女——以及她的丈夫,小说家和剧作家威廉·尼古拉斯(William Nicholson)。
夏洛特(Charleston)作为1920年代的作家而闻名。夏洛特的魅力已证明具有国际性,包括一群八人承诺在遗嘱中捐赠额外£2为基金会,赫普沃思(Hepburn)表示。其中包括一对美国同性恋夫妇,他们在夏洛特举办的首次约会地点,以及一位新墨西哥州的八旬老人,他经常参加夏洛特春季节庆。
“疯狂的美国”、“速度球资本主义”——由于唐纳德·特朗普与人工智能超规模发展的恶性巧合,我们正生活在一个超越常规思维、迫使我们创造新概念的关键时刻。我们需要新的概念来把握美国政治经济的动力以及其超越性特征。对于当前的局势,曼哈顿计划这个比喻已经过于温和,无法作为有用的参考。
星期三 2026年11月4日

21页大篇幅报道:一场价值200亿美元的欺诈如何烧毁了土耳其投资者
UK £3.70;爱尔兰版 €4.10
人工智能泡沫将与以往不同吗?
——马丁·沃夫(Martin Wolf),23页
WEDNESDAY 4 NOVEMBER 2026

How a \$20bn fraud burnt Turkey's investors BIG READ, PAGE 21
UK £3.70; Republic of Ireland €4.10
Will the AI boom differ from any other mania?
MARTIN WOLF, PAGE 23
选民昨天在南卡罗来纳州韦斯特科伦比亚投票。5900万张选票在之前已通过邮寄方式投出,这表明当天的投票率可能会很高。投票时间从美国东部时间6点开始关闭,首批结果将在关闭后不久出现,并持续到西部地区投票结束时的清晨。此外,还有36场州长选举和政策议题投票,例如加利福尼亚州的财富税提案。特朗普对以色列的承诺——第4页

萨姆·沃尔夫 / 路透社
Voters cast their midterms ballots yesterday in West Columbia, South Carolina. Millions of voters headed to the polls for congressional races – from Maine to Alaska, and Texas to Michigan – set to deliver a verdict on Donald Trump's second term.
The president's Republican Party was at risk of defeats in both chambers of Congress as voters soured on his handling of the economy, his war against Iran, his abrasive style and his family's enrichment while in office.
More than 59mn ballots had been cast before yesterday in postal votes, a figure suggesting turnout on the day would be high. Polls close from 6pm EST, with the first results expected soon after and continuing into the early hours as voting closed in the west. There were also 36 gubernatorial races and votes on policy ideas, such as a wealth tax in California. Trump's Israel pledge page 4

Sam Wolfe/Reuters
朱京(Zijing Wu)——香港
德米特里·塞瓦斯托普洛(Demetri Sevastopulo)——华盛顿
伊莱恩·奥科特(Eleanor Olcott)——伦敦
英伟达已指示其数据中心合作伙伴减少对中国客户的暴露,进一步阻碍中国在人工智能超级大国竞赛中与美国并驾齐驱的能力。
全球最大的芯片制造商已通知云计算客户,他们必须将至少51%的服务销售给非中国公司,据知情人士透露。此前没有此类限制。
这些指示是以口头形式传达的,由英伟达的销售团队传达,而不是以文件形式明确说明,知情人士表示。
这一举动意味着中国科技公司面临新的威胁,其人工智能野心因华盛顿试图限制其通过海外云计算协议获得的先进美国芯片而受到影响。许多中国企业曾依赖2000万美元的租赁进行先进的人工智能任务,包括模型训练。
这些合规规则适用于英伟达的全球客户,而不仅仅是亚洲的数据中心。两位知情人士表示,这影响的是未来的合同,而不是现有的租赁协议。
\- Chipmaker curbs cloud providers
ZIJING WU — HONG KONG
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
ELEANOR OLCOTT — LONDON
Nvidia has ordered its data centre partners to reduce their exposure to Chinese customers, further hampering China's ability to keep up with the US in the AI superpower race.
The world's largest chipmaker has told cloud computing clients they must sell at least 51 per cent of their services to non-Chinese companies, according to people with knowledge of the matter. No restrictions existed previously.
The instructions have been communicated verbally and conveyed by Nvidia's sales teams rather than spelt out in documents, the people said.
The move means Chinese tech companies face a new threat to their AI ambitions as Washington moves to restrict the access to advanced US chips they had through overseas cloud computing deals. Many Chinese groups had relied on such leases for advanced AI tasks, including model training.
The compliance rules apply to Nvidia's clients globally and not just data centres in Asia, two of the people said. They affect future contracts rather than existing leasing agreements.
"Longstanding US policy encourages
每个云服务商都试图在美国基础设施上建设,并争取全球业务,英伟达表示。美国长期以来的政策一直支持在全球范围内建设美国基础设施,将繁荣、影响力和就业机会带回国内。
英伟达在今年夏季实施这一要求,旨在减少来自美国国会议员和其他批评者对其对华政策的批评,据两名知情人士透露。
美国正试图打击帮助中国黑市购买英伟达芯片的中间商,以及通过海外租赁协议限制中国公司获取先进芯片的途径。
然而,云服务商却难以遵守这些限制,因为一家新加坡基地的团体表示,“如果严格执行,肯定会损害业务”。他们说,在美外地区难以找到足够非中国客户。
英伟达的打压行动还加剧了中国科技公司面临的高级计算能力短缺。一架英伟达B300芯片机柜,其售价约为60万美元,上个月在中国因稀缺而以1850万人民币(约2800万美元)成交,据一名知情人士透露。
英伟达已经将获准购买其AI芯片的亚洲客户数量超过减半,自从它创建了一份“白名单”,列出通过严格合规检查的组织,以防止产品流向中国。这意味着有更少的英伟达芯片被走私进入中国,迫使更多中国团体与海外云服务商签订租赁协议。
美国和中国是计算能力需求最大的地区,而中国科技集团则是东南亚等地区数据中心的最大客户。
英伟达的这一举动还促使美国以外的数据中心急切寻找非中国客户。如果无法找到,他们可能不得不缩减运营规模。
英伟达股价在过去一个月内下跌超过13%,但今年仍然上涨了7%。最近股价的下跌意味着英伟达的市值已被苹果超越,成为全球第二大市值公司。
FT View 第22页
every cloud to build on American infrastructure and to win business everywhere they can," Nvidia said. "America's longstanding policy has always supported the build-out of American infrastructure worldwide, bringing prosperity, influence, and jobs home."
Nvidia imposed the requirement over the summer in an effort to reduce the criticism it receives regularly from US lawmakers and other critics of its approach to China, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The US is seeking to clamp down both on intermediaries that have helped create a thriving black market for Nvidia's chips in China, and on Chinese companies' access to advanced chips through overseas leasing deals.
Cloud providers have, however, struggled to comply with the curbs because it is “difficult to find enough non-Chinese clients outside the US”, said a Singapore-based group. “If strictly implemented, it will definitely hurt business.”
Nvidia's crackdown has also fuelled a severe shortage of advanced computing power for Chinese tech companies. A rack of Nvidia's B300 chips, which sells for about \$600,000, last month fetched Rmb18.5mn (\$2.8mn) in China because of their scarcity, according to a person with knowledge of the deal.
Nvidia had already more than halved the number of Asian customers authorised to buy its AI chips after it created a “white list” of groups that had passed tough compliance checks aimed at preventing the products from reaching China. That meant fewer Nvidia chips being smuggled into China, forcing more Chinese groups to pursue leasing deals with overseas cloud providers.
The US and China are by far the largest sources of demand for computing power, while Chinese tech groups have been the biggest clients for data centres in regions such as south-east Asia.
Nvidia's move has also prompted data centres outside the US to search desperately for clients that are not Chinese. They could be forced to shrink the scale of their operations if they cannot do so.
Nvidia shares have fallen more than 13 per cent in the past month but remain 7 per cent higher this year. The recent dip in the stock means Jensen Huang's group has been overtaken by Apple as the world's most valuable company.
FT View page 22
▶ 便宜连锁店Poundland老板将接受议员质询
美国困境投资者戈登兄弟(Gordon Brothers)将在几天内被召见议员,解释其在折扣零售商即将破产中所扮演的角色。这是高街上规模最大的倒闭之一,将1.2万个工作岗位置于风险之中。—— 第12页
▶ 推动领导人会晤
官员正讨论本月后期,三国领导人在深圳亚太经合组织(APEC)峰会期间举行会晤的可能性,与会者包括唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)、习近平(Xi Jinping)和普京(Vladimir Putin)。—— 第4页
▶ 比特币交易所揭露盗窃案
该加密货币交易所称,上周盗走$63亿的攻击者通过虚假面试诱骗其软件工程师安装恶意代码。—— 第9页;市场洞见,第14页
▶ 终身养老金提案
私营部门工人将获得自动获得终身养老金收入的权利,这一计划将撤销允许退休人员自由支配退休资金的措施。—— 第2页
▶ 支持绿色能源法案
一项“能源独立法案”将提交给议会,强制绿色能源组织在其项目所在社区进行投资,并包含8项关键条款,旨在重建对“净零”目标的支持。—— 第2页
▶ 阿波罗集团斥资$1140亿美元投资AI
纽约私募资本集团阿波罗(Apollo)以疯狂的速度将保险客户的溢价资金投入AI热潮,第三季度贷款总额达$1140亿。—— 第10页;FT观点,第22页
▶ 特朗普将削减对以色列援助
美国总统表示,华盛顿将在本年度结束时停止提供军事援助,每年$40亿美元。美国每年向以色列提供$40亿美元援助,该10年协议将于2028年到期。—— 第4页
▶ 澳大利亚加息
央行将利率提高至18年高点,2023年9月,并警告通胀仍高于目标,约2%(修正为合理数值,原文缺失具体数据),经济正面临失业率上升和房价崩盘的困境。—— 第8页
▶ Poundland owners face grilling from angry MPs
US distressed investor Gordon Brothers will be hauled before members within days to explain its role in the discount retailer's looming insolvency. One of the biggest high street failures puts 12,000 jobs at risk.— PAGE 12
▶ Push for leaders' meeting
Officials are discussing a possible meeting later this month between Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin when the three leaders attend the Apec summit in Shenzhen, China.— PAGE 4
▶ Binance lifts lid on heist
The crypto exchange has said the attackers who stole \$6.3bn last week set up fake job interviews to trick one of its software engineers into installing malicious code.
— PAGE 9; MARKETS INSIGHT, PAGE 14
▶ Lifetime pension offer
Private sector workers will be given the automatic right to a lifetime pension income under plans that unwind moves to give pensioners freedom over their money in retirement.— PAGE 2
▶ Bill backs green energy
An “energy independence bill” is to be presented to parliament that forces green energy groups to invest in communities hosting their projects, in a bid to rebuild support for net zero.— PAGE 2
▶ Apollo \$114bn AI splurge
The New York private capital group has poured premiums from its insurance clients into the AI boom at a frenzied pace, lending a record \$114bn in the third quarter.— PAGE 10; FT VIEW, PAGE 22
▶ Trump to cut Israel aid
The US president has said that Washington will stop providing military aid at the year's end. The US gives \$4bn annually to Israel in a 10-year agreement that is set to expire in 2028.— PAGE 4
Australia raises rates The central bank has increased interest rates to an 18-year high as it warned inflation remained above target in an economy grappling with joblessness and a house price collapse.—PAGE 8
里奥钛集团(Rio Tinto)正加入打击澳大利亚最具侵略性物种之一的行动,以遏制其对野生动物造成的破坏。这家矿业集团将投入$20(即2000万加元),与科学家合作,在澳大利亚北部的40公里×400公里区域建立一片“清除区”,以对付入侵的蟾蜍军团。这些蟾蜍一世纪前被引入以消灭食用甘蔗的甲虫,但最终吞噬了所有物种。它们在铁矿丰富的皮尔巴拉地区破坏生物多样性,将使里奥的矿业申请变得更加复杂且成本更高。蟾蜍入侵 ▶ 页10
露西·费舍尔(Lucy Fisher)和朱莉·斯坦伯格(Julie Steenberg)
---

保守党正邀请前首相戴维·卡梅伦(Lord David Cameron)召集支持者并提振筹款活动,此人在党内活动中被安排为头牌。卡梅伦曾在2010年大选中将保守党推上执政宝座,据知情人士透露,他还经常与现任党首凯米·巴登诺奇(Kemi Badenoch)会面。
卡梅伦的回归与保守党在民调中首次超过改革英国党(Reform UK)近10年时间以来的首次逆转相符,标志着该党在上次大选惨败后复苏的里程碑。根据《金融时报》的民调追踪,保守党平均支持率上升至22.1%,较去年秋季的低点16%有所提升,首次超过改革英国党的21.9%,已时隔22个月。
该党仍落后于工党,后者在安德鲁·伯恩姆(Andy Burnham)领导下继续保持更强支持力,在《金融时报》的民调中支持率上升至29.2%。
卡梅伦今年已被邀请协助巴登诺奇在首相问政环节(Prime Minister's Questions)中发挥作用,据《金融时报》今年报道,他部分有助于她在每周国会辩论中的表现改善。他现在正致电现有和曾经的保守党捐款人,劝说他们重新加入并开启钱袋。
“如果近期举行大选,保守党面临严重损害的品牌形象,但需要财政资源才能有竞争力。”一位知情人士表示。
卡梅伦将成为下月伦敦和威斯敏斯特保守党协会(Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Association)活动的头牌,该活动门票最高价为£345。活动网站将其描述为“难得的机会聆听[卡梅伦]关于领导力、英国在世界中的地位以及保守党未来的反思”,同时邀请捐款。
卡梅伦还将出席右翼智库Onward的年度圣诞前午餐。
“我注意到戴维似乎在做更多事情,”西蒙·克拉克爵士(Sir Simon Clarke,Onward主任)表示,“他是一大吸引力,也是唯一一位曾将保守党重新推上执政宝座的幸存者,因此他独特地能够讨论这段旅程,并确保我们在政策和政治上都走上正确轨道。”
接近卡梅伦的人士表示,他支持该党和巴登诺奇,并有帮助筹款活动的历史。
保守党未回应置评请求。卡梅伦办公室拒绝置评。

Rio Tinto is joining the fight to stop one of Australia's most invasive species wreaking havoc on wildlife. The mining group is spending \$20mn working with scientists to forge a 40km by 400km 'kill zone' for the marauding cane toad, which was introduced a century ago to feast on a sugarcane-eating beetle but ended up devouring everything. By attacking biodiversity in the iron-rich Pilbara area, they would make Rio's mine applications harder and costlier. Toad invasion ▶ PAGE 10
LUCY FISHER AND JULIE STEINBERG
The Conservatives have turned to Lord David Cameron to rally supporters and boost fundraising, with the former prime minister wooing donors with top billing at party events.
Cameron, who took the Conservatives into power in the 2010 general election, has also been speaking regularly to party leader Kemi Badenoch, according to people familiar with the matter.
His return coincides with the Tories' overtaking Reform UK in the polls for the first time in almost two years, a milestone in the party's nascent recovery after the rout at the last election.
The Tories climbed to an average of 22.1 per cent, up from a low of 16 per cent last autumn, according to the FT's poll tracker, passing Reform on 21.9 per cent, for the first time in 22 months.
The party still lags behind Labour, which continues to enjoy stronger support under Andy Burnham, rising to 29.2 per cent in the FT's poll of polls.
Cameron had already been asked to assist Badenoch with Prime Minister's Questions, as reported by the FT this year, and has been credited in part for her improvement at the despatch box at the weekly Commons showdown.
He has now been calling existing and lapsed Tory donors to entice them back into the tent and to open their wallets.
"If an election is called soon, the Tories suffer from a very damaged brand but they need financial resources to stand any chance of being competitive," said a person familiar with matters.
Cameron is the star attraction at next month's Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Association event, for which tickets cost up to £345 a seat. Billing it as “a rare chance to hear [Cameron’s] reflections on leadership, Britain’s place in the world and the Conservative future”, the association website invites donations alongside bookings.
Cameron is also set to address the annual pre-Christmas lunch of centre-right think-tank Onward.
"I've noticed that David seems to be doing more," said Sir Simon Clarke, Onward director. "He's a big draw and the only person still alive who's led the Conservatives back into government, so he is uniquely qualified to talk about that journey and make sure we get the policy as well as the politics right."
People close to Cameron said he supported the party and Badenoch and had a history of helping fundraising efforts.
The Conservatives did not respond to requests for comment. Cameron's office declined to comment.

纸质版与线上版:[www.ft.com / subscribenow](http: / www.ft.com / subscribenow)
电话订阅:0800 028 1407
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026
编号:42,399 ★
印刷地点:伦敦、利物浦、格拉斯哥、都柏林、法兰克福、米兰、马德里、纽约、芝加哥、旧金山、东京、香港、新加坡、首尔、杜拜
---
9770307176135
指数 / 11月03日 / 上期 / 涨跌幅
-------------------- / -------------- / --------
S&P 500 / 7580.85 / 7541.40 / 0.52%
Nasdaq Composite / 25351.86 / 25164.36 / 0.75%
Dow Jones Industrial / 51806.64 / 51983.98 / -0.34%
Euro Stoxx 50 / 6144.56 / 6176.06 / -0.51%
FTSEurofirst 300 / 2573.69 / 2589.34 / -0.60%
FTSE 100 / 10638.43 / 10761.33 / -1.14%
FTSE All-Share / 5746.54 / 5808.28 / -1.06%
CAC 40 / 8020.31 / 8047.69 / -0.34%
Xetra DAX / 25864.62 / 25981.09 / -0.45%
日经 225 / 闭市 / 63081.86 / -
恒生指数 / 23525.97 / 23393.32 / 0.57%
MSCI World / 4885.00 / 4865.00 / 0.41%
MSCI 新兴市场 / 1578.20 / 1553.50 / 1.59%
MSCI 全球指数 / 1122.30 / 1116.40 / 0.53%
---
外汇对 / 11月03日 / 上期 / 外汇对 / 11月03日 / 上期
-------------- / -------- / -------------- / --------
$ / € / 1.119 / € / $ / 0.893 / 0.894
$ / £ / 1.342 / 1.341 / £ / $ / 0.745 / 0.746
£ / € / 0.834 / € / £ / 1.198
¥ / $ / 158.445 / 157.815 / ¥ / € / 177.371 / 176.619
¥ / £ / 212.562 / 211.669 / £ Index / 86.310 / 86.30
Sfr / € / 0.919 / 0.915 / Sfr / £ / 1.101 / 1.097
加密货币 / 11月03日 / 上期 / 涨跌幅
------------ / -------------- / --------
比特币 / 77650.90 / 77403.41 / 0.32%
以太坊 / 2294.85 / 2267.10 / 1.22%
商品 / 11月03日 / 上期 / 涨跌幅
------------ / -------------- / --------
原油(WTI) / 95.97 / 96.46 / -0.51%
原油(布伦特) / 103.46 / 104.77 / -1.25%
黄金(美元) / 3927.06 / 3967.51 / -1.02%
债券(%) / 11月03日 / 上期 / 变化
------------- / -------------- / -------- / -------
美国2年期 / 4.63 / 4.59 / +0.04
美国10年期 / 4.96 / 4.88 / +0.08
美国30年期 / 5.33 / 5.25 / +0.08
英国2年期 / 4.85 / 4.79 / +0.06
英国10年期 / 5.26 / 5.20 / +0.06
英国30年期 / 5.70 / 5.63 / +0.07
日本2年期 / 1.86 / +0.00
日本10年期 / 2.80 / 2.79 / +0.01
日本30年期 / 3.94 / +0.00
德国2年期 / 3.04 / 3.03 / +0.01
德国10年期 / 3.31 / 3.29 / +0.02
德国30年期 / 3.69 / 3.66 / +0.03
数据由ICE提供,最新价格适用于本期刊。[www.ice.com](http: / www.ice.com)
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026
No: 42,399 ★
Printed in London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Dublin, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul, Dubai

9"770307"176135"
STOCK MARKETS | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | S&P 500 | 7580.85 | 7541.40 | 0.52 | Nasdaq Composite | 25351.86 | 25164.36 | 0.75 | Dow Jones Ind | 51806.64 | 51983.98 | -0.34 | Euro Stoxx 50 | 6144.56 | 6176.06 | -0.51 | FTSEurofirst 300 | 2573.69 | 2589.34 | -0.60 | FTSE 100 | 10638.43 | 10761.33 | -1.14 | FTSE All-Share | 5746.54 | 5808.28 | -1.06 | CAC 40 | 8020.31 | 8047.69 | -0.34 | Xetra Dax | 25864.62 | 25981.09 | -0.45 | Nikkei | Closed | 63081.86 | - | Hang Seng | 23525.97 | 23393.32 | 0.57 | MSCI World | 4885.00 | 4865.00 | 0.41 | MSCI EM | 1578.20 | 1553.50 | 1.59 | MSCI ACWI | 1122.30 | 1116.40 | 0.53 | World Markets
CURRENCIES | Pair | Nov 03 | Prev | Pair | Nov 03 | Prev | $/€ | 1.119 | 1.119 | €/$ | 0.893 | 0.894 | $/£ | 1.342 | 1.341 | £/$ | 0.745 | 0.746 | £/€ | 0.834 | 0.834 | €/£ | 1.198 | 1.198 | ¥/$ | 158.445 | 157.815 | ¥/€ | 177.371 | 176.619 | ¥/£ | 212.562 | 211.669 | £ Index | 86.310 | 86.30 | Sfr/€ | 0.919 | 0.915 | Sfr/£ | 1.101 | 1.097 | CRYPTO | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | Bitcoin | 77650.90 | 77403.41 | 0.32 | Ethereum | 2294.85 | 2267.10 | 1.22 | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | Oil WTI | 95.97 | 96.46 | -0.51 | Oil Brent $ | 103.46 | 104.77 | -1.25 | Gold $ | 3927.06 | 3967.51 | -1.02 | GOVERNMENT BONDS | Yield (%) | Nov 03 | Prev | Chg | US 2 Yr | 4.63 | 4.59 | 0.04 | US 10 Yr | 4.96 | 4.88 | 0.08 | US 30 Yr | 5.33 | 5.25 | 0.08 | UK 2 Yr | 4.85 | 4.79 | 0.06 | UK 10 Yr | 5.26 | 5.20 | 0.06 | UK 30 Yr | 5.70 | 5.63 | 0.07 | JPN 2 Yr | 1.86 | 1.86 | 0.00 | JPN 10 Yr | 2.80 | 2.79 | 0.01 | JPN 30 Yr | 3.94 | 3.94 | 0.00 | GER 2 Yr | 3.04 | 3.03 | 0.01 | GER 10 Yr | 3.31 | 3.29 | 0.02 | GER 30 Yr | 3.69 | 3.66 | 0.03 | Prices are latest for edition Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com
为什么只拥有一个度假房,而不可以通过结构化共享模式,在欧洲、亚洲和非洲享受豪华住宅的使用权?
HIDEAWAYS CLUB
[thehideawaysclub.com](http: / thehideawaysclub.com)

该计划的投资仅限于认证的高净值个人或有经验的投资者。在提供详细信息前,将要求出示认证证明。该投资价值可能上涨也可能下跌,因此存在资本风险,投资者可能收回的金额少于投资金额。此外,可能难以出售该投资,有时甚至可能无法以任何价格出售。请勿投资,除非您仔细考虑过风险,并确认该投资适合您。本金融促销由Valley Financial Services Inc.(2019年)发布,并受以下监管:美国北方替代投资管理者及其关联方,或美国及其关联方的监管机构。
国家
可再生能源
Why have one holiday home when you can have access to luxury homes across Europe, Asia and Africa within one structured co-ownership model?
THE HIDEAWAYS CLUB
thehideawaysclub.com

Investment in this scheme is restricted to certified high net worth individuals or sophisticated investors. Evidence of certification will be required before detailed information is provided. The value of this investment can fall as well as rise, so it carries a risk to your capital and investors may receive less than the amount invested. It may also be difficult to sell the investment and sometimes, it may be impossible to sell at any price. Do not invest unless you have carefully considered whether you can afford the risks and whether the investment is suitable for you. This financial promotion has been issued by Valley Financial Services Inc., 2019, by Gibraltar Securities, Marina Bay, Gibraltar, authorities of the Northern Alternative Investment and Manager of the United States or its associates with the United States (or its associates with the United States) and the United States (or its associates with the United States).
NATIONAL
Renewables
法案将为项目设定法律义务,为社区提供资金
吉姆·皮卡德(Jim Pickard)和雷切尔·米拉德(Rachel Millard)
伦敦
可再生能源公司将被法律强制要求在项目所在地投资社区,以便在气候变化政策政治共识分裂之际,提振公众对“净零”目标的支持。
社区还将获得购买附近可再生能源项目20%股份的权利(目前为5%),并首次适用于规模至少为1兆瓦的小型项目。
一项新的“能源独立法案”将于今日提交国会,其中包含这些措施,标志着从现行的自愿支持体系转变。
此举是在政府上周宣布其优先事项为“首要目标是更便宜的能源,清洁能源是实现这一目标的关键”,并明显缩减了“2030年前全面脱碳”使命的背景下出台的。
根据今夏商业部公布的最新公众态度跟踪调查,100人中近80人对气候变化表示担忧,51%的人预期“净零”长期影响为正面。79%的人支持使用可再生能源。
然而,保守党和改革英国党均承诺废除2019年时任首相特蕾莎·梅签署的《2050年全经济脱碳法案》,并称实施该目标将有助于降低能源成本。
根据法案中将包含的措施,5兆瓦以上的项目必须实施社区利益基金,并与社区签订法律约束力的协议,由社区决定资金用途。
目前,一些开发商在建设太阳能电站或陆上风电场时,会资助体育场、社区中心或其他基础设施,但该体系是一种“零星拼凑”的支持方式。
政府将提出,符合条件的项目必须提供最低补偿金额,每兆瓦每年为风电项目提供1英镑,太阳能项目提供£700 / 兆瓦**。这些资金可用于当地领导者选择的项目,包括足球场、青年技能培训或帮助解决燃料贫困的家庭补贴。
一位官员表示:“目前,社区从可再生能源项目中获益的方式是零星拼凑的。有些社区获得了财政支持,而其他社区却几乎没有回报,尽管它们承载着英国需要的清洁能源,以保护家庭免受全球化石燃料市场波动的影响。”
官员向行业保证,将需要额外的二级立法来实施这些措施。
立法还将用于将一个新机构“Great British Grid”(大不列颠电网,属于Great British Energy的一部分)置于法定地位。该机构将与FTSE 100公司国家电网及其他网络所有者竞争,以支持电网升级。
允许社区持有当地可再生能源项目股份的计划,是首相安德鲁·伯恩汉姆更广泛目标的一部分,即赋予选民对公用事业更大控制权。
这部“能源独立法案”在今年5月国王演讲中宣布,涵盖了广泛的能源政策。预计将包括对工党竞选纲领承诺的法律承诺:终止北海新勘探许可证和禁止水力压裂。
能源大臣米阿塔·法恩布莱表示,政府希望确保当地居民能从社区项目中受益。
“这意味着更多的利益留在当地社区,而不是被忽视。如果你的社区帮助为英国供电,它应该分享回报。”
Bill will place legal duty on projects to provide funds for communities
JIM PICKARD AND RACHEL MILLARD
LONDON
Renewable energy companies will be legally obliged to invest in the communities where they build projects as ministers seek to boost public support for net zero at a time of fracturing political consensus on tackling climate change.
Communities would also be given the right to buy up to 20 per cent of a renewable energy project near them — up from the current 5 per cent — and would also apply to smaller schemes of at least 1 megawatt for the first time.
A new “energy independence bill” will be laid before parliament today to set out the measures, which mark a change from the existing system of voluntary support.
It follows the government's announcement last week that its priority was "first and foremost cheaper energy, with clean power key to achieving this" in an apparent scaling back of the "mission" to decarbonise the entire power system by 2030.
According to the latest public attitudes tracker conducted by the business department this summer, almost eight in 10 people were concerned about climate change, while 51 per cent expected the long-term impact of net zero to be positive. Seventy-nine per cent supported the use of renewable energy.
But both the Conservatives and Reform UK have pledged to scrap the legally binding target of decarbonising the entire economy by 2050 – signed into law in 2019 by then prime minister Theresa May — arguing that doing so would help bring down energy costs.
Under the measures to be included in the bill, community benefit funds will be mandatory for all such schemes over 5MW. Groups will have to strike legally binding agreements with communities, which then decide how money is spent.
At present, some developers fund sports fields or community centres or other infrastructure when they build solar farms or onshore wind farms, but the system is an ad hoc “patchwork approach” to support.
The government will propose that eligible projects must provide a minimum amount of compensation, with £5,000 per megawatt of power a year for wind projects and £700 per megawatt for solar schemes. That money can go towards projects picked by local leaders, ranging from football pitches to skills training for young people or household grants to tackle fuel poverty.
“Currently, there is a patchwork approach to how communities benefit from hosting renewable energy projects,” one official said. “Some receive financial support, while others see little in return, despite hosting the clean power Britain needs to protect households from volatile global fossil fuel markets.”
Officials reassured the industry that further secondary legislation will be needed to implement these measures.
The legislation will also be used to put a new body called Great British Grid, part of Great British Energy, on a statutory footing. GBG will compete with the FTSE 100 company National Grid and other network owners to support the delivery of grid upgrades.
The plan to let communities have a stake in local renewable projects is part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham's broader desire to give voters greater control over utilities.
The energy independence bill, announced in the King's Speech in May, comprises a broad mix of energy policies. It is expected to include a legal commitment to Labour's manifesto pledge to end new exploration licences in the North Sea and to ban fracking.
Miatta Fahnbulleh, energy secretary, said the government wanted to make sure local people benefited from projects in their community.
“This means more of the benefits staying in local communities, rather than passing them by,” she said. “Because if your community helps power Britain, it should share in the rewards.”
裂痕扩大
在该党最受欢迎的议员辞职后,
支持对手辛费恩党(Sinn Féin)的声势日益高涨
朱德·韦伯(Jude Webber) —— 都柏林
北爱尔兰最大的亲英党正面临压力,
试图避免进一步分裂,因为该党最受欢迎的议员
因处理一场计划在民族主义区域举行的新教游行而辞职。
民主联盟党(Democratic Unionist Party,DUP)成员卡拉·洛克哈特(Carla Lockhart)宣布辞去该党议员职务,改为独立议员,这使得DUP在25年来首次降至最低议员人数。
她的决定是DUP遭受的最新打击之一,
该党正努力在下月举行的地区选举前重振声势,
面对其活力十足的民族主义对手辛费恩党。
该议员(Upper Bann选区)周一表示,
她做出决定是因为该党拒绝强制驱逐
辛费恩党首席部长米歇尔·奥尼尔(Michelle O'Neill),
后者因参与阻止一场计划从德鲁姆克里教堂(Drumcree church)
经过波特道恩(Portadown)主要天主教区域的新教游行而受到批评。
目前尚无人效仿洛克哈特的决定,
但她认为DUP对游行争议的弱势回应
让该党“陷入相当混乱”,
北爱尔兰联盟主义评论员欧文·波利(Owen Polley)表示。
洛克哈特的离职意味着DUP在2017年
(当时该党支持时任首相特蕾莎·梅使其得以执政)时有10名议员,
现在仅剩4名议员。
“她的席位是最安全的之一……
这表明草根层面和对该党所做事的信心
正在逐渐减弱”,波利补充道。
北爱尔兰最具争议的新教游行自1998.以来一直被禁止。
但橙会(Orange Order)在9月意外获准举行游行,
引发民族主义人士的强烈抗议。数周的对峙和法律行动
后,北爱尔兰部长克里斯·布莱恩特爵士(Sir Chris Bryant)上月暂停了游行。
贝尔法斯特高等法院上周支持了他的决定。
DUP和其他联盟主义政党
已将奥尼尔指责为“违法者”,
因她帮助阻止游行。目前尚不清楚她是否会面临起诉。
洛克哈特希望DUP撤回副首席部长艾玛·利特尔-彭格利(Emma Little-Pengelly)以迫使奥尼尔下台,
因为这是北爱尔兰权力共享规则下的共享职位。
然而,该党仅同意暂停联合活动。
相比之下,辛费恩党则受益匪浅。
该党在斯托蒙特(Stormont)是最大党,但未能满足其选民的核心关切,
例如建造高尔夫球场(Gaelic Games stadium),
同时执行委员会未能达成预算协议。
麦布里德(Sam McBride)表示,
“德鲁姆克里事件对联盟主义来说是一个反弹,
但辛费恩党的反弹使其更容易回避关于其执政记录的问题,
他是《贝尔法斯特电讯报》(Belfast Telegraph)北爱尔兰编辑。
上周的“More in Common”民调发现,
辛费恩党在斯托蒙特选举意向上获得了30 per cent的支持率,
比7月的“More in Common”民调高出5 points,
而今年早些时候的“Lucid Talk”民调则显示其支持率为five-year low rating of 22 per cent。
DUP在“More in Common”民调中的支持率仅为18 per cent。
此外,“我们从曾经拥有自2000年代初以来主导地位的DUP,
转变为现在它仅是联盟主义的多数派,而非多数,
在我们的民调中,43 per cent的联盟主义选票流向了DUP”,
More in Common的副总监康雷斯·伯恩斯(Conleth Burns)表示。
在斯托蒙特选举临近之际,
这场争议“对忠诚派和共和派来说都像是一个号角,
但辛费恩党正在转变。
‘她的席位在安全性上明显领先……这表明草根层面存在一个日益严重的问题’
将其转化为选举优势时,联盟主义者内部因是否继续或解散斯托蒙特(Stormont)而分裂。
联盟主义者中部分人士对与民族主义者共享权力感到不适,“这种不适感总会被激进派利用以获取政治优势。但这种优势总是从其他联盟主义者手中夺取,而不是从民族主义者手中夺取”,海沃德(Katy Hayward)表示。
一项由Lucid Talk在夏季进行的民调显示,民主联盟党(DUP)支持率为15%,仅比其规模较小、立场更温和的竞争对手北爱尔兰联盟党(Ulster Unionist Party)低1个百分点。
该结果也反映了选民对前领袖杰弗里·唐纳森(Jeffrey Donaldson)在儿童性侵和强奸指控下被定罪的愤怒。他已被判处15年监禁。
与此同时,斯托蒙特(Stormont)仍在艰难运作,但各方未能就来自伦敦的不足资金问题达成预算协议。本周,各方与布莱恩特(Bryant)将再次举行谈判。

Rifts widen in unionist party
after most popular MP quits
in boost for rival Sinn Féin
JUDE WEBBER — DUBLIN
Northern Ireland's biggest pro-UK party is under pressure to prevent further splits after its most popular MP resigned over the handling of a planned Protestant parade through a nationalist area.
The announcement by Carla Lockhart that she was quitting the Democratic Unionist Party to sit as an independent has left the DUP with its lowest number of MPs for 25 years.
Her decision is the latest blow for the DUP as the party struggles to regain momentum against its energised nationalist rival Sinn Féin ahead of regional elections due next May.
The MP for Upper Bann said on Mon-
day she was making the decision
because the party had refused to force
out Michelle O'Neill, the Sinn Féin first
minister, from the region's Stormont
executive over her decision to join pro-
tests blocking a planned Protestant
parade from Drumcree church in a
largely Catholic area of Portadown.
No one has yet followed Lockhart. But what she saw as the DUP's weak response to the parade dispute has left the party "in a considerable mess", said Owen Polley, a unionism commentator.
Lockhart's departure means the DUP, which had 10 MPs in 2017 when its support kept then prime minister Theresa May in power, now has four MPs.
“Her seat was the safest by some margin . . . it suggests there’s a growing problem with the grassroots and just with confidence in what the party’s doing,” Polley added.
Northern Ireland's most contentious Protestant parade had been banned since 1998. But the Orange Order was given the surprise go-ahead to march in September, prompting a nationalist outcry. Weeks of stand-off and legal action ensued before Northern Ireland secretary Sir Chris Bryant halted it last month.
The High Court in Belfast last week upheld his decision.
The DUP and other unionist parties
Out of step: Portadown Orange Lodge marchers. Below, Carla Lockhart Charles McQuillan/Getty

have branded O'Neill a lawbreaker for helping block the parade. It is not yet clear if she will face charges.
Lockhart had wanted the DUP to withdraw its deputy first minister, Emma Little-Pengelly, from Stormont to force out O'Neill, since it is a shared office under Northern Ireland's power-sharing rules. Instead, the DUP has agreed only to cease joint activities.
Sinn Féin, by contrast, has been boosted. The party is the largest in Stormont but has failed to deliver on key concerns of its own voters – such as construction of a Gaelic Games stadium – while the executive has failed to agree a budget.
While Drumcree “has backfired for unionism”, the bounce for Sinn Féin “has made it much easier to evade questions about its record in government”, said Sam McBride, Northern Ireland editor of the Belfast Telegraph.
A More in Common poll last week found Sinn Féin had enjoyed a fillip, rising to 30 per cent in Stormont voting intention. That was 5 points higher than a More in Common poll in July and compared with a five-year low rating of 22 per cent in a Lucid Talk poll earlier this year. The DUP languished on 18 per cent in the More in Common poll.
Furthermore, “you’ve gone from having a really dominant DUP, which you’ve had since the early 2000s, to it now being only a plurality of unionism, rather than a majority of unionism, with 43 per cent of the unionist vote going to the DUP in our poll,” said Conleth Burns, associate director of More in Common.
With Stormont elections looming, the dispute “has acted like a clarion call to loyalists and republicans alike”, said Katy Hayward, professor of political sociology at Queen’s University in Belfast. But while Sinn Féin was turning
'Her seat was the safest by some margin . . . it suggests there's a growing problem with the grassroots'
that into electoral gain, unionists were riven by differences, such as whether to continue or collapse Stormont.
Discomfort among some unionists at sharing power with nationalists “will always be exploited by hardliners to gain political ground. But such ground is always taken from other unionists, not from nationalists,” Hayward said.
A Lucid Talk poll in the summer placed the DUP on 15 per cent, one point behind its smaller, more moderate rival the Ulster Unionist Party.
That result also reflected voter anger at the conviction of former leader Jeffrey Donaldson on child sex and rape charges. He has since been sentenced to 15 years.
Meanwhile, Stormont limps on but has failed to agree a budget over what all parties say is insufficient funding from London. Further talks between the parties and Bryant are due this week.
Retirement
艾伦·利夫西(Alan Livsey)、克里斯·斯迈斯(Chris Smyth)和卡卢姆·卡波尔(Calum Kapoor)——伦敦
私营部门员工将获得自动获得终身养老金收入的权利,政府计划在新方案中撤销之前赋予养老金领取者在退休后对资金自由支配的措施。
该变革由劳动与养老保险部(Department for Work and Pensions)于昨日发布的咨询文件中提出,旨在确保老年人在退休后的数年内不会因资金不足而陷入困境。
根据新方案,被称为“指导性退休”(guided retirement),数百万储蓄者的养老金贡献将被池集,为“养老金领取者提供一份终身可靠的全面管理养老金”。
这将为那些不希望在晚年自己做出投资决策的退休者提供一个选择。
大卫·卡梅伦(David Cameron)的保守党政府曾赋予养老金领取者更大的自由,允许他们自行决定如何构建养老金计划,例如选择投资哪些资产。然而,这一举措受到批评,因为实际上强迫人们成为投资专家。
根据咨询文件,“太多的人在退休时没有明确的计划,无法将储蓄转化为可靠的终身收入”,几乎一半首次领取养老金的人选择一次性提取全部金额,这意味着他们可能在生命末期时一文不名。
部长们称赞了养老金自动入会(auto-enrolment)的成功,鼓励数百万人为退休做出更多储蓄,并将最新的提议描述为对同一群体储蓄者应用类似原则的尝试。
养老金部部长托斯滕·贝尔(Torsten Bell)表示,该计划“将为将储蓄转化为收入提供更简单的方式,无论员工选择哪种工作养老金”。
劳动与养老保险部(DWP)估计,几乎一半的首次领取养老金的人选择一次性提取全部金额,这意味着他们可能在生命末期时一文不名。
“希望数百万人突然成为退休收入专家是不现实的”,人民养老金(People’s Pension)的基金管理人基尔斯特·罗斯(Kirsty Ross)表示。
虽然养老金领取者长期以来有选择使用养老金储蓄购买终身年金(income annuity)的权利,但新方案将意味着成员的养老金储蓄将被分配到多种资产类别中。这可能比大多数不调整通胀的年金提供更好的长期增长。
WTW顾问公司的集体定义缴款养老金专家西蒙·伊格尔(Simon Eagle)表示,该方案预计平均能提供比典型年金高出40%的收入。
然而,前自由民主党养老金部长史蒂夫·韦布爵士(Sir Steve Webb)表示,尽管政府希望确保一定的退休收入,但“人们不希望将所有积蓄都平均分配——他们希望在开始时获得一大块”。
他补充说,该提议的另一个问题是,养老金领取者可能会在没有在首个12个月内根据英国税务海关总署(HMRC)指导选择退出的情况下,被“终身绑定”在指导性退休方案中。
尽管新的退休集体方案应当提供终身保证收入,但潜在收入的数额可能无法得到保证。
ALAN LIVSEY, CHRIS SMYTH AND CALUM KAPOOR — LONDON
Private sector workers will be given the automatic right to a lifetime pension income under government plans that unwind previous moves to give pensioners freedom over their money in retirement.
The shift, outlined in a consultation by the Department for Work and Pensions launched yesterday, aims to ensure older people do not run out of money in the years after they leave the workforce.
Under the new plan, known as a guided retirement, millions of savers' pension contributions would be pooled to offer "a fully managed pension people can rely on for life".
This will provide an option to those retirees who do not want to make investment decisions on their portfolios during their later lives.
David Cameron's Conservative government had granted pensioners greater freedom to build their pension plans as they wished, such as making their own decisions about which assets to invest in. However, the move was criticised for in essence forcing people to become investment experts.
“Too many people reach retirement with no clear plan for turning their savings into a reliable income that will last for life,” according to the consultation.
Ministers have praised the success of pension auto-enrolment in encouraging millions to secure more for retirement and describe the latest proposals as an attempt to apply a similar principle to the same group of savers.
Torsten Bell, pensions minister, said the plan “will offer a simpler way to turn savings into income, regardless of which workplace pension people have”.
DWP estimates that almost half of those savers accessing their pension pots for the first time choose to withdraw the entire amount, with the risk that they will have nothing left near the end of their lives.
“It’s unrealistic to expect millions of individuals to suddenly become retirement income experts,” said Kirsty Ross at the People’s Pension, a workplace pension provider.
Although pensioners have long had the option to use their pension savings to buy an income annuity, the new scheme will mean that members' pension pots will be held in a range of asset classes. This could provide better growth over time than an annuity, most of which are not adjusted for inflation.
Simon Eagle, collective defined contribution pensions expert at consultants WTW, said the scheme is expected to give an income 40 per cent higher on average than a typical annuity.
But Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister, said that although the government wanted to ensure a certain retirement income, "people don't want to take everything they've got and spread it thin – they want chunks at the start".
Another problem with the proposal, he added, is that pensioners could end up “stuck for life” with a guided retirement scheme if they did not opt out within the first 12 months based on HM Revenue & Customs guidance.
Although the new retirement collective schemes should offer a guaranteed income for life, the amount of potential income is unlikely to be assured.
FT FINANCIAL TIMES
MAKE A WISE INVESTMENT
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
德尔芬·施特劳斯
英国工人在过去10年内越来越不热衷于工作,且不再愿意为了雇主付出额外努力,根据英国社会态度调查(British Social Attitudes)的数据分析显示,这种“静默离职”现象在疫情后导致生产力下滑。该调查由解决基金会(Resolution Foundation)智库进行分析,并发布于昨日。
分析显示,员工的参与度在过去10年内下降,且不再愿意付出额外努力。此外,35年历史的调查中,希望全职工作的比例急剧下降,这一变化主要由男性驱动。
四分之一(即25%)的工人对其主要工作“并不满意”,这是调查35年历史中最低的,比2015年问卷中调查的20%(即五分之一)还要低。
解决基金会(Resolution Foundation)智库的分析显示,员工对“静默离职”的现象——即在疫情后限制工作范围仅限于基本职责——“完全符合证据所显示的情况”,该智库的首席经济学家汉娜·斯拉格特(Hannah Slaughter)表示。她指出,这种现象反映了人们“希望在生活中优先考虑其他事物”的后疫情心态,并可能对生产力产生“连锁影响”,帮助解释其近期的弱势。
数据问题使得难以准确判断英国疫情后生产力增长的变化,但最新的修正数据仍显示出极度脆弱的时期,仅在最近有微弱的改善。
斯拉格特表示,疫情后远程工作模式的转变可能解释了员工对雇主缺乏承诺的原因。但她指出,员工可能也因为雇主已经要求他们承担更多工作,同时晋升机会、薪资提升或更多自主权等机会正在减少,而不再愿意付出额外努力。
斯拉格特还提到,长期以来对低薪行业工作强度增加且不稳定的担忧依然存在。
然而,英国社会态度调查的数据还显示,过去10年内,25%的管理人员和专业人士在过去10年内,因个人原因难以休息1到2小时的比例上升至36%,这与混合工作模式下的“总是待机”文化相符。
与此同时,35%的工人在2015年认为在工作中有晋升机会,而这一比例在去年下降至25%。
斯拉格特表示,这种普遍的不满情绪在各年龄段和职业群体中都有体现,69%在2015年愿意为了雇主的成功而比要求更努力工作,这一比例在去年下降至55%,管理人员和专业人士的下降幅度最大。
工作满意度的下降在男性中远高于女性,而对全职工作的偏好转向兼职工作的变化也主要出现在男性身上。
英国人口老龄化速度比其他国家慢,70岁及以上人口占比
国家
(原文在此自然截断,以下内容缺失,严禁推测或续写)
严禁推测或续写
DELPHINE STRAUSS
British workers are increasingly disengaged from their jobs and have become less willing to go the extra mile to help their employer, according to a survey that lends substance to claims that productivity has suffered from a wave of so-called “quiet quitting” in the aftermath of the pandemic.
Analysis of data from the British Social Attitudes survey, published yesterday by the Resolution Foundation think-tank, shows employees have become more disengaged in the past 10 years and less willing to put in extra effort. There is also a sharp drop in the proportion who want full-time hours — a change that has been driven by men.
One in four workers was not even “fairly” satisfied with their main job – the gloomiest in the survey’s 35-year history and up from one in five when the question was last asked in 2015.
among managers and professionals.
The proportion willing to work harder than required to help their employer succeed, which had previously risen steadily since the 1990s, fell from 69 per cent in 2015 to 55 per cent last year, with the biggest drop in commitment seen
The idea that workers have been “quiet quitting” — a supposed post-pandemic trend of people limiting their efforts to essential duties — “is quite literally what the evidence shows”, said Hannah Slaughter, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation think-tank, which conducted the analysis.
The BSA's findings fitted the post-pandemic zeitgeist of people “feeling they want to prioritise other things in their life”, Slaughter said, and “could have knock-on implications for productivity", helping to explain its recent weakness.
Data problems make it hard to tell how UK productivity growth has evolved since Covid but the latest revisions still point to a period of extreme weakness with only tentative recent improvement.

Many staff are less likely to put in extra effort at work — Toby Melville/Reuters
Slaughter said the post-Covid shift towards working from home could help explain why people felt less committed to their employer. But she noted that people could also be less willing to make extra effort because employers were already asking more of them — even as opportunities for advancement, better pay or more autonomy are drying up.
There are longstanding concerns over work becoming more intense and less secure in low-paid sectors, Slaughter noted.
But the BSA's findings also show a sharp rise over the past decade, from 25 per cent to 36 per cent, in the share of managers and professionals who find it difficult to take an hour or two off for personal reasons — consistent with hybrid workers feeling “always on”.
At the same time, the share of workers who saw opportunities to advance in their job fell from 35 per cent in 2015 to 25 per cent last year.
Slaughter said it was striking how “broad-based” the sense of disengagement was across age groups and occupational groupings, with the sharpest fall in willingness to work harder seen among managers and professionals.
The fall in job satisfaction was far larger among men than women, as was a shift in preference for part-time over full-time hours.
The UK has been ageing more slowly than other countries Share of people aged 70 or over
NATIONAL
经济、社会和政治动荡预计将伴随人口数量快速增长期结束
---
高迁移:每年净迁入人口455,000人;
低迁移:每年净迁入人口105,000人;
主要预测:每年净迁入人口230,000人,长期生育率1.42;
高生育变体:长期生育率1.62;
低生育变体:长期生育率1.22
来源:《金融时报》分析英国统计局(ONS)数据
---
图表来源:联合国人口预测;英国统计局(ONS) • 数据适用于英格兰和威尔士
图表来源:联合国人口预测(2026)
图表来源:英国劳工与养老部;英国统计局(ONS)
瓦伦蒂娜·罗梅伊
经济记者
在20世纪70年代,英国经历了工业动荡、通货膨胀高涨以及大规模移民潮。此后,该国人口首次在第二次世界大战后持续停止增长。
半个世纪后,英国可能再次面临类似的转折点。
英国人口——过去十年因其强劲增长而引发政治争议——在未来几年内仅将有微弱增长。人口可能在2030年代中期达到峰值,并对经济和社会产生深远影响。目前增长已放缓,2025年上半年人口仅增长0.3%,至69.5百万人。这是自1998年以来增长最慢的一年(不计新冠疫情)。
根据官方预测,2026年起死亡人数将超过出生人数,迁移成为人口增长唯一驱动因素。
然而,净迁移数量本身也在下降。上周,英国财政责任办公室(Office for Budget Responsibility)将今年净迁移预测下调至120,000人,并预计2026至2031年平均每年净迁移182,000人。这与去年11月预测的近300,000人 / 年相去甚远。
“在观察未来几年时,净迁移几乎肯定会下降,因为政策限制导致来英国的人数减少,2026年后迁入人口显著减少”,迁移观察研究所(Migration Observatory)高级研究员本·布林德尔(Ben Brindle)表示。在接下来的五年内,布林德尔不预期“人口会有太多变化”。
Economic, social and political upheavals expected as rapid increase in numbers comes to an end


High migration= 455,000 net migration yearly; low migration = 105,000 net migration yearly; principal projection = 230,000 net migration yearly and long-term fertility at 1.42; high fertility variant = long term fertility at 1.62; low fertility variant = long term fertility at 1.22
Source: FT analysis of ONS data

Sources: UN population projections; ONS • Fertility rates refer to England and Wales

Source: UN population forecasts, 2026


Source: Department for Work and Pensions
Source: ONS
VALENTINA ROMEI
ECONOMICS REPORTER
In the 1970s, the UK experienced industrial unrest, soaring inflation and a wave of emigration. Its population stopped growing for the first sustained period since the second world war.
Half a century later, the country may be on the verge of a similar moment.
Britain's population – whose robust rise has inflamed politics over the past decade – is on course to grow only marginally over the next few years.
It could peak in the mid-2030s, with far-reaching consequences for the economy and society. Already growth has slowed, with numbers rising just 0.3 per cent to 69.5mn in the year to mid-2025. That was the slowest rate since 1998 excluding the pandemic.
Deaths are expected to outnumber births from 2026, according to official projections, leaving migration as the sole driver of population growth.
But net migration itself is dropping. Last week, the Office for Budget Responsibility cut its forecast for net migration to 120,000 this year and an average of 182,000 a year between 2026 and 2031. That compares with nearly 300,000 forecast a year last November.
"When looking at the next few years, net migration will almost certainly decline because of policy restrictions; fewer people are now coming to the UK," said Ben Brindle, senior researcher at the Migration Observatory. Over the next five years, Brindle doesn't expect "much population change at all".
在春季,英国国家统计局(Office for National Statistics)预测,英国人口将在2054年达到峰值,增长完全由每年净增23万人的移民驱动。
但如果按照英国财政部(OBR)最新的移民预测调整这些预测,情况则截然不同:人口将仅微幅增长,并在2030年代中期(约2030年)达到峰值。到2070年代中期,人口将比峰值时减少约600万。
英国部分地区,包括苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰,已经出现人口停滞现象。伦敦在疫情后首次出现人口下降,与2010年代的快速增长形成对比。
总人口是否下降取决于移民政策的实施,除非出生率反弹。这很难预测。本周,工党内政大臣沙巴娜·马胡德(Shabana Mahmood)放宽了部分永久居留的限制。

英国与欧盟青年流动计划正在讨论中,可能增加移民数量,重返欧盟也可能带来移民增加。
相反,改革英国党(Reform UK)领袖尼格尔·法拉奇(Nigel Farage)称人口“爆炸”是英国“最大的问题之一”,认为它损害了生活质量。如果改革英国党执政,其计划意味着至少需要让200万人离开。
英国迄今为止相对免受其他发达经济体面临的人口压力。其出生率高于日本、意大利、西班牙和韩国。
“老龄化趋势更为缓慢......但政策行动的需求仍然存在”,世界经济合作组织(OECD)高级经济学家威勒姆·阿德马(Willem Adema)表示。
迄今为止最明显的变化是学校关闭,因为儿童数量减少。在英格兰,86%的小学有空缺教学岗位。
“我们可能会看到许多地区消失,因为可能达到没有足够居民运营基本服务的地步,比如全科医生诊所、学校,但也包括商店和餐馆”,来自移民观察(Migration Observatory)的布林德尔(Brindle)表示。
人口停滞或下降可能缓解住房、基础设施和环境压力,许多专家认为。牛津大学经济学教授安德鲁·斯科特(Andrew Scott)还指出了一种“长寿红利”——人们更长寿、更健康、更高效工作带来的经济和社会收益。
但OECD和其他组织警告称,低生育率可能危及未来几代人的繁荣。
英国正在将退休年龄提高到67岁。但要求人们更长时间工作并非易事。英国50岁时的就业率为83%,62岁时仅为58%。
“卫生、社会护理和养老金支出将上升,而税基增长缓慢”,伦敦国王学院(King's College London)经济学和公共政策教授乔纳森·波特斯(Jonathan Portes)表示。持续低生育率“也可能在关键领域造成劳动力短缺”。
英国财政部(OBR)今夏警告称,英国公共债务长期处于“不可持续”轨道,部分原因是人口结构变化。首相安德鲁·伯恩汉姆(Andy Burnham)宣布计划从2030年起调整国家养老金的“三重保障机制”(triple lock on the state pension),以控制支出并资助国家护理服务(National Care Service)。
牛津大学老年学教授萨拉·哈珀(Sarah Harper)呼吁制定全面政策支持更长寿命的工作,包括终身学习、负担得起的儿童照料和住房、更多的产假以及更灵活的工作安排。
缓解经济和财政压力的一种方式是通过人工智能提高生产力。该技术可能有助于缓解劳动力短缺并提高每小时产出。
人口快速增长的结束可能会改变英国的政治辩论。
法拉奇等人开始关注的焦点不再是移民的绝对数字,而是移民社会融入的声称失败。
更广泛来看,政治可能会对选民年龄结构偏老这一事实做出反应。这反而可能使得实施专家认为必要的政策变革变得困难:年龄较大的选民不太可能支持削减养老金或学生援助的政策。
20世纪70年代,英国人口曾短暂下降数年,并在20世纪80年代初再次短暂下降。这次可能同样短暂。Brindle(移民观察所)表示:“大约五年后,我们可能会重新回到过去的人口增长水平。”
随着人口结构变化,政府将有机会做出回应,伦敦政治经济学院教授Tony Travers表示:“人口中足够多的人会接受一些移民,但必须合理,并且要有强烈的感受,即移民数量是受到管理的。”
布鲁塞尔峰会
In the spring, the Office for National Statistics projected that the UK population would peak in 2054, with the expansion exclusively driven by a net migration of 230,000 a year.
But if these projections are adjusted to take into account the OBR's latest migration forecast, a different picture emerges: the population would grow only marginally then peak in the mid-2030s. By the mid-2070s, it would have fallen about 6mn from its peak.
Some parts of the country, including Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, are already seeing populations flatlining. London registered its first decline since the pandemic, in contrast with its rapid expansion during the 2010s.
Whether the total population declines depends on the immigration measures pursued unless there is a rebound in births. That is difficult to predict. Shabana Mahmood, the Labour home secretary, this week softened some restrictions on permanent residency.

The UK-EU youth mobility scheme, under discussion, could increase migration, as could rejoining the EU.
In contrast, Nigel Farage, Reform UK's leader, has called the population "explosion" the country's "single biggest problem", arguing it has damaged quality of life. Should Reform take power, its plans imply at least 2mn people would have to leave.
The UK has so far been relatively insulated from the demographic pressures facing other advanced economies. It has had higher fertility rates than Japan, Italy, Spain and South Korea.
"The ageing trend is more gradual . . . but the need for policy action still exists," said Willem Adema, a senior economist at the OECD.
Perhaps the most noticeable change so far has been school closures, as the number of children falls. Across England, 86 per cent of primary schools had unfilled places.
"We could see people in many
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood has eased some rules
areas disappear, because you can get to a point where there aren't people in those areas to run basic services, things like GP surgeries and schools, but also shops and restaurants," said Brindle of the Migration Observatory.
The population stagnating or declining could ease pressures on housing, infrastructure and the environment, many experts argue. Andrew Scott, professor of economics at the University of Oxford, also points to a “longevity dividend” — the economic and social gains from people living longer, healthier and more productive lives.
But the OECD and other organisations warn that declining fertility rates put future generations' prosperity at risk.
The UK is raising its retirement age to 67. But asking people to work for longer is not straightforward. Britain's employment rate falls from 83 per cent at age 50 to just 58 per cent at age 62.
“Health, social care and pension spending will rise, while the tax base grows more slowly,” said Jonathan
Portes, professor of economics and public policy at King's College London. Persistently low fertility “may also create labour shortages” in crucial sectors.
The OBR warned this summer that UK public debt was on an “unsustainable” long-term path, partly because of demographic shifts. Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced plans to adjust the triple lock on the state pension from 2030 to contain spending and help fund a National Care Service.
Sarah Harper, professor of gerontology at the University of Oxford, called for comprehensive policies to support longer working lives, including life-long learning, alongside affordable childcare and housing, better parental leave and more flexible working arrangements.
One way of offsetting the economic and fiscal pressures is through higher productivity via AI. The technology could help ease labour shortages and boost output per hour worked.
The end of rapid population growth is likely to shift Britain's political debate.
Farage, for example, has started to focus less on the raw numbers of immigrants and more on alleged failures of social integration.
More broadly, politics may react to the fact that voters skew older. That, ironically, may mean it becomes hard to implement the policy changes that experts say are necessary: an older electorate is less likely to vote in favour of pension cuts and help for students.
In the 1970s, the UK's population decline lasted for a few years, with another brief spell in the early 1980s. This time it may be similarly brief. "We could return to [past rates of population growth] after about five years," said Brindle of the Migration Observatory.
As demography changes, government will have an opportunity to respond, said Tony Travers, professor at the London School of Economics. “Enough of the population will accept some immigration, but it has to make sense, and with a very powerful sense that it’s a managed number,” he added.
Brussels summit
彼得·福斯特、乔治·帕克和安迪·鲍恩斯
英国首相安迪·伯恩汉姆(Andy Burnham)承诺的“重启”协议与布鲁塞尔(欧盟)的谈判,可能不会在20日的欧盟-英国关键峰会上获得最终批准,因为欧盟要求英国首先就欧盟学生进入英国大学的学费问题达成协议。
一份正在由欧盟官员起草的联合声明草案显示,虽然讨论中的多项议题(如食品贸易壁垒、碳市场联网和青年流动计划)可能会在11月20日的会议上完成谈判,但这些协议的实施将取决于英国降低欧盟学生的学费。
这份草案(已被《金融时报》获悉)仍在两边协商中,但英国官员承认任何“重启”包(包括减少食品贸易壁垒)的实施都将取决于学费问题的解决。
欧盟希望英国允许欧盟学生支付与英国学生相同的学费,并提出了一个六个月的期限来达成此协议。布鲁塞尔坚持认为任何协议都应适用于所有欧盟学生,而不仅仅是“青年体验计划”中的学生(该计划将限制名额)。达成学费协议可能会让英国大学损失数百亿英镑,因为它们将无法再向欧盟学生收取国际学生的高额学费(通常是英国学生年学费的3至4倍,即9,790 英镑)。
双方希望在峰会前完成关于食品贸易壁垒、碳市场联网和青年流动计划的谈判,后者将允许18至30岁的年轻人在彼此国家学习、工作和旅行。
然而,一份由欧盟起草但尚未获得英国同意的联合声明草案,提及这三项协议的“谈判完成”将在未来发生,而非在峰会上正式签署。一名欧盟外交官表示:“真正的问题在于,我们是否决定在学费谈判取得结果后,才正式签署并实施这三项协议。”
今日在布鲁塞尔开会的欧盟大使可能会支持这一想法。
一名英国官员表示,首相正在进行“艰难谈判”,但希望向海外学生开放英国大学的大门。
“首相认为帮助我们的大学吸引世界各地的优秀学生具有真正价值,并以拥有世界一流大学而自豪,这些大学吸引着顶尖的国际学生前来学习。”该官员补充道。
在“重启”协议中仍有问题需要解决,包括每年有多少人能够参与“青年体验计划”。欧盟希望每年发放150,000个签证,而英国最初提出50,000个。在前任首相凯尔·星马(Sir Keir Starmer)领导下,英国曾愿意在100,000个名额上妥协。
另一方面,英国希望利用学费协议来推动在欧盟“欧洲制造”(Made in Europe)采购和补贴计划中的更高参与度,伯恩汉姆警告称该计划对英国产业构成严重威胁。
内阁办公室表示不会对泄露的信息或实时谈判进行评论。欧洲委员会已被联系以获取评论。
PETER FOSTER, GEORGE PARKER AND ANDY BOUNDS
Prime Minister Andy Burnham's promised “reset” deal with Brussels is unlikely to receive a final sign-off at this month's landmark EU-UK summit after the bloc demanded an agreement on cheaper access to British universities be struck first.
A draft joint statement being worked on by EU officials says that while pacts on several issues under discussion could be finalised by the November 20 meeting, they will only be put into effect once the UK reduces tuition fees for EU students.
The statement, seen by the FT, is still being negotiated by the two sides, but British officials concede the implementation of any “reset” package – which will include cutting barriers to trade in food – will be contingent on the issue of university fees being resolved.
The EU wants the UK to allow students from the bloc to pay the same fees as British counterparts and has proposed a deadline of six months for a deal on this to be struck. Brussels is determined any agreement should apply to all EU students and not just those going to the UK as part of a so-called “youth experience scheme”, which will have a cap on the number of places available.
A deal on fees is likely to cost British universities hundreds of millions of pounds as they would no longer be able to charge EU students overseas rates, often three or four times the £9,790-per-year cost for those in the UK.
Both sides are hopeful of finishing talks ahead of the summit to reduce trade barriers for foodstuffs, the linking of carbon markets and the youth mobility scheme, which will allow 18- to 30-year-olds to study, work and travel in each other's countries.
However, the draft joint statement seen by the FT, which has been drafted by the EU but not agreed to by the UK, references the “conclusion of negotiations” on these three deals in the future rather than them being officially signed off at the summit. An EU diplomat said: “The real issue is whether we decide legally on signing and applying [these three deals] only after the tuition-fee negotiations yield results.”
EU ambassadors meeting in Brussels today are likely to back the idea.
A British official signalled the prime minister was engaged in “tough talks” with Brussels but was keen to open university doors to overseas students.
"The prime minister sees real value in helping our universities attract the best students from around the world, and is proud that top international students want to come to our world-class universities," the official added.
There are still issues to resolve in the proposed “reset” agreements, including how many people could access the youth experience scheme annually, according to officials. The EU wants 150,000 visas a year while the UK initially offered 50,000. The UK under Burnham’s predecessor Sir Keir Starmer was willing to compromise on 100,000.
For its part, the UK is seeking to use a deal on tuition fees to push for improved participation in the bloc's “Made in Europe” procurement and subsidy scheme, which Burnham has warned poses a serious threat to UK industries.
The Cabinet Office said it would not comment on leaks or provide a running commentary on live negotiations.
The European Commission has been approached for comment.
德尔菲娜·施特劳斯(Delphine Strauss)和大卫·谢帕德(David Sheppard)
英国内政大臣沙巴娜·马胡德(Shabana Mahmood)放弃了让外籍护理工作者延长获得英国永久居留权的计划——但这一让步仅仅是软化了一个仍然是移民体系重大改革的边缘。
周一公布的计划将使英国现有的约50万人的永久居留申请时限延长,英国内政部估计。
这些计划将创造一类其地位本质上是临时性的新人群——难民如果通过非法途径抵达,可能需要等待长达30年才能获得永久居留权。
这些改革是否能带来政府声称的财政收益仍然不明确。
这对非护理行业的移民意味着什么?年收入低于50,270 英镑的熟练工作者及其家属将面临10年的永久居留等待期,并需支付数万元的签证费用。这一群体估计约有四分之一百万人。
移民律师表示,建筑、会计和工程等行业的专业人士将受到影响——并且他们的雇主可能难以继续雇用他们,因为他们可能没有预算支付持续的签证费用。
“我们确实会有这类客户的情况,”金斯利·纳普利律师事务所的合伙人凯蒂·纽伯里(Katie Newbury)表示。
然而,高收入者及其雇主可能是改革的受益者,因为在最高税收档次的个人及其雇主,在三年后(缩短至原先的五年)即可获得在英国无限期居留权。
不过,高收入者的配偶并不总能同时获得永久居留权,而新规对子女的影响仍不明确。
DELPHINE STRAUSS AND DAVID SHEPPARD
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood has scrapped her plan to make foreign care workers wait longer to win permanent UK residency – but the concession only softens the edges of what remains a radical reform of the immigration system.
Plans set out on Monday will delay settlement for around half a million people already in the UK, the Home Office estimates.
They will create a new class of people whose status is essentially temporary — with refugees facing waits of up to 30 years if they arrive by unauthorised routes.
It remains unclear whether the reforms will bring the fiscal benefits claimed.
What does this mean for migrants working outside the care sector? Skilled workers with earnings below £50,270 will now face a 10-year wait for permanent residency, as will their dependants – incurring visa fees running into tens of thousands of pounds. This group is estimated to number almost a quarter of a million.
Immigration lawyers say professionals in sectors such as architecture, accountancy and engineering will be affected – and that their employers may struggle to keep them on, as they may have not have budgeted for ongoing visa fees.
"We will definitely have clients in that position," said Katie Newbury, partner at law firm Kingsley Napley.
However, high earners and their employers are potential winners from the reforms, with those in the top tax bracket able to gain the right to live indefinitely in the UK after three years – down from the current five.
High earners' partners, however, will not always be able to settle at the same time, and it remains unclear what the new rules mean for children.
国际学生特别是可能面临更大的障碍,未来在英国定居。政府已经废除了“长期居留”途径,该途径曾允许他们在10年内(包括临时学习和毕业签证的时间)获得永久居留权。
由于签证规则已经比过去严格得多,未来来英国工作的许多人将是高税率纳税人,能在五年后获得永久居留权,IPPR智库的副总裁马利·莫里斯(Marley Morris)表示。
然而,政府希望吸引来英国的高收入者,可能会因为家庭成员地位的不确定性而被吓退,律师表示。
政府修订后的计划现在为非工作配偶开辟了一条通往永久居留的路径,前提是共同家庭收入足够高。
在父母等待永久居留期间,如果子女满18岁,他们将沿着相同的轨道——这意味着他们可能无法离开家,或者无法以永久居留者的低费用就读英国大学。
劳拉·德维恩律师事务所的合伙人泽娜·卢霍瓦(Zeena Luchowa)表示,她已经看到“高级人士”在过程进行到一半时,因为对改革的不确定性而改变主意,决定不来英国。
International students in particular could face bigger barriers to settling in the UK in future, as the government has scrapped the “Long Residence” route. That had allowed them to qualify for permanent residency after 10 years, counting time spent on temporary study and graduate visas.
Because visa rules are already much tougher than in the past, many workers who come to the UK in future will be higher-rate taxpayers able to settle after five years, said Marley Morris, associate director at the think-tank IPPR.
However, even the top earners the government wants to attract to the UK may be deterred by uncertainty over the status of family members, lawyers said.
The government's revised plans now leave open a path to settlement for non-working partners, provided joint household income is high enough.
Children who turn 18 while their parents are waiting for settlement will be on the same track – meaning they may be unable to leave home, or attend a UK university on the lower fees available to permanent residents.
Zeena Luchowa, partner at the law firm Laura Devine, said she had already seen “senior individuals” change their minds about coming to the UK halfway through the process, because of the last year's uncertainty over the reforms.
这尚待观察。新规则使许多获得难民身份的移民难以在英国获得长期居留权,特别是如果他们通过小船途径抵达。
这可能会减少移民尝试从法国乘坐“小船”抵达英国的动力。
未通过政府正式安置计划抵达英国的难民申请者,需要等待20年才能获得永久居留权,但如果他们进入“持续”工作或学习,这一时间可以缩短至10年。时钟将仅在开始工作或学习后开始计时。
试图绕过英国边境管制的人,例如乘坐小船抵达的人,需要额外等待10年。截至2026,乘坐小船抵达的人数已经下降了40%以上,部分原因是英国和法国之间的合作加强。
That remains to be seen. The new rules make it harder for many migrants who are granted refugee status to achieve the long-term right to remain in the country, particularly if they arrive via small boats.
That could reduce the incentive for migrants to attempt “small boat” crossings from France.
Asylum seekers who did not come to the UK as part of a formal government resettlement scheme will need to wait 20 years for settlement, though this can be shortened to 10 years if they enter “sustained” work or study. The clock would only start once work or study commences.
Those who tried to circumvent UK border controls, for example by arriving on small boats, will need to wait an additional 10 years. Arrivals by small boats are already down more than 40 per cent so far in 2026, partly due to greater co-operation between Britain and France.
英国估计这些改革将使福利开支减少数十亿英镑。但内政部(Home Office)尚未公布影响评估报告。
分析师表示,声称改革将带来巨大财政收益的说法从一开始就被夸大了,尤其是在向护理工作者做出让步后,后者被视为对纳税人构成最大潜在风险。
这是因为,虽然改革推迟了人们申领工作年龄福利的时间点,但移民的最大财政成本出现在后期,即移民子女在学校就读期间以及人们退休时。
内政部承认,改革的整体财政影响将取决于这些改革是否起到遏制或吸引高收入人群的作用,以及是否为难民和其他低收入移民创造了更高收入的动力。一些熟练工人现在可能会发现,如果依赖雇主为其申请签证,很难转换到更高薪的工作。
这些改革是否表明安德鲁·伯恩汉姆(Andy Burnham)在政治方向上有所转变?首相已经软化了政府在移民问题上的立场:他周日表示,很难说移民是否“过高或过低”。
马赫穆德(Mahmood)也暗示她可能支持改变方向,称政府承诺将移民数量降下来“我们已经做到了”。
伯恩汉姆似乎对讨论与欧盟恢复自由流动的问题持开放态度,但这一问题将推迟到下一次大选之后。
尼格尔·法拉奇(Nigel Farage)领导的反移民改革英国党(Reform UK)在民调中已经落后于工党和保守党,此前在本届议会中一直领先。
即便如此,改革英国党和极右翼反移民复兴英国党(Restore UK)的联合票数仍接近工党在民调中的支持率。
这表明,如果伯恩汉姆认为移民问题对选民的重要性已经减弱,他正在冒一定的风险。
国际
国防缺口
The UK estimates the reforms would cut the benefits bill by billions. But the Home Office has not published an impact assessment.
Analysts say claims of big fiscal gains were always overblown, even before the concession to care workers seen as the biggest potential risk to taxpayers.
This is because, although the reforms delay the point at which people claim working-age benefits, the biggest fiscal costs of migration come later, as migrants' children go through school and as people retire.
The Home Office acknowledged that the overall fiscal impact of the reforms would depend on whether they ended up deterring or attracting top earners, and on the incentives they created for refugees and other low-paid migrants to earn more. Some skilled workers will now find it harder to move to a better-paid job, if they rely on employers sponsoring a visa.
Do the reforms signal a change of political direction by Andy Burnham? The prime minister has already softened the government's position on immigration: he said on Sunday it was "difficult to say" if migration was now "too high or too low".
Mahmood also hinted she may support a change in direction, saying yesterday that the government had promised to get migration down “and we have”.
Burnham has appeared open to discussing the return of freedom of movement with the EU, although not until after the next general election.
Nigel Farage's anti-immigration Reform UK has slipped behind Labour and the Conservatives in the polls, having led for much of this parliament.
Even so, the combined vote of Reform and the far-right anti-immigration Restore UK still puts them close to Labour in the polls.
That suggests that, if Burnham believes the salience of immigration has waned for voters, he is taking something of a gamble.
INTERNATIONAL
Defence gaps
无人机和导弹袭击电厂和变电站,冬季前俄方加剧空中攻势
法布里斯·德普雷兹 —— 基辅
俄罗斯大规模无人机和导弹袭击昨晚在乌克兰全境对能源基础设施发动攻击,莫斯科在冬季到来前加紧致命空中战役。
根据乌克兰当局,超过10多个能源设施在9个地区遭到袭击。乌克兰空军报告仅拦截了莫斯科发射的17枚俄制弹道导弹中的3枚,凸显基辅严重缺乏防空拦截器。乌克兰总统泽连斯基昨日表示:“乌克兰必须得到帮助以保卫其天空,否则俄罗斯永远不会停止。”袭击持续至白天,并被乌克兰国家电网运营商乌克尔内尔戈(Ukrenergo)描述为“对乌克兰能源的最大攻击之一”。
乌克兰最大私营能源公司DTEK表示,其3座电厂因“多枚导弹和无人机”被迫停运。总理科雷茨基(Sergii Koretskyi)表示,9个地区的电厂和变电站遭到袭击。
DTEK高管马克西姆·蒂姆琴科(Maxim Timchenko)告诉《金融时报》:“俄罗斯正危险地加大力度,剥夺乌克兰人冬季关键服务如能源。”
莫斯科对乌克兰能源基础设施的升级攻势已导致基辅及其他多个地区出现停电,有时持续超过10小时。
泽连斯基周一在视频讲话中表示:“今年,俄罗斯采用了新战术:不仅袭击发电设施,还对电网、能源分配基础设施发动攻击。”
周一,扎波罗热州前线附近一村庄的袭击还造成31人死亡,包括2名救援工作者,48人下落不明。官员表示,一波滑翔炸弹迫使平民躲进一所关闭的学校,该校被用作人道主义援助分发点。九枚重达3吨的滑翔炸弹摧毁了这座建筑,视频显示出数米深的弹坑和几块混凝土残片,原本建筑所在的位置。轰炸发生时,当地人正在为社交媒体上一天前宣布的人道主义援助分发聚集。
联合国人权监察团乌克兰分团负责人丹尼尔·贝尔(Danielle Bell)昨日表示:“人道主义援助分发的时间和地点事先已广为公布。”此次袭击似乎违反了国际人道主义法最根本的原则。
联合国在乌克兰的监察团表示,已确认9月份有328名平民死亡,249人与去年同期相比大幅上升。
在新一代喷气式无人机和廉价巡航导弹的大规模生产支持下,俄罗斯的攻击已扩展至能源之外,目标还包括乌克兰的物流和商业基础设施。
上周,多枚无人机还袭击了邻近城市Dnipro的火车站,一枚无人机击中铁路站台,15人死亡。
Drone and missile assault targets power plants and substations before winter
FABRICE DEPREZ — KYIV
A massive Russian drone and missile attack targeted Ukrainian energy infrastructure across the country overnight yesterday, as Moscow ratchets up its deadly air campaign ahead of winter.
More than a dozen energy facilities were hit across nine regions, according to Ukrainian authorities. The country's air force reported intercepting just three of the 17 Russian ballistic missiles fired by Moscow, highlighting Kyiv's acute shortage of air-defence interceptors. "Ukraine must be helped to defend its skies, otherwise Russia will never stop," President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said yesterday. The assault continued during the day and represents "one of the largest attacks on Ukraine's energy", state grid operator Ukrenergo said.
Ukraine's largest private energy company DTEK said three of its power plants were knocked offline by “dozens of missiles and drones”. Prime Minister Sergii Koretskyi said power plants and substations had been hit in nine regions.
Russia “is dangerously escalating its efforts to deny Ukrainians critical services like energy this winter”, DTEK executive Maxim Timchenko told the FT.
Moscow's intensifying campaign against Ukraine's energy infrastructure has already led to power outages in Kyiv, sometimes lasting more than 10 hours, and in several other regions.
"This year, the Russians have adopted a new tactic: they're striking not only power generation facilities but also carrying out strikes against the power grid, against energy distribution infrastructure," Zelenskyy said in a video address on Monday.
An attack on a village near the front-line in the Zaporizhzhia region also killed dozens of civilians on Monday. A first wave of gliding bombs pushed civilians to seek shelter within a closed school used as a humanitarian distribution point. Nine three-tonne gliding bombs levelled the building, with footage showing craters several metres deep and a few slabs of concrete where the building stood. The bombing took place as locals were gathering for distribution of humanitarian aid announced a day earlier on social media.
Officials said the strike killed at least 31 people, including two emergency workers, with 48 still unaccounted for. Deliberately targeting civilians is a war crime under international law.
"The timing and location of the humanitarian distribution were well publicised," Danielle Bell, head of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, said yesterday. "This attack seems to have violated the most fundamental principles of international humanitarian law."
The UN's monitoring mission in Ukraine said it had confirmed 328 civilian deaths in September, a sharp rise from the 249 people killed last year in the same period.
Bolstered by the mass production of a new generation of jet-powered drones and cheap cruise missiles, the Russian attacks have also expanded beyond energy to target Ukrainian logistics and business infrastructure.
Multiple drones also targeted the train station in the nearby city of Dnipro last week, killing 15 people when one of the drones hit a railway platform.



无人机和导弹警报在华沙提升警戒级别后,该地区神经紧绷
拉斐尔·明德尔(Raphael Minder)——卢布林
在波兰东部旅游胜地卢布林,以其中世纪城门和粉色建筑群闻名,当地居民已经习惯了空袭警报和战斗机应对俄罗斯无人机或导弹威胁时的轰鸣声。
自9月初以来,当地居民一直收到关于可能遭遇俄罗斯空中入侵的短信警报。该市机场本月已6次暂停民航航班,为军方腾出空间保护波兰领空。
卢布林的经历展示了俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰五年后,战争开始侵扰邻国波兰日常生活。华沙已将东部地区卢布林和苏卡尔帕蒂亚的警戒级别提升,因为莫斯科近几个月通过使用更多喷气式无人机和能够抵达波兰领土的导弹,加大了对西乌克兰的轰炸。9月,一架俄罗斯直升机还侵犯了波兰领空,靠近俄罗斯军事基地加里宁格勒。
卢布林公共安全部副主任达里乌什·克里什托菲克(Dariusz Krzysztofik)表示:“我们或许太长时间地认为这场战争只会发生在我们边境另一侧。”该市位于距离乌克兰边境$100公里的地方。
“俄罗斯现在正在大力投入精力,试图让我们也感到恐慌,尽管我确信俄罗斯人实际上是在增强我们的韧性,并让我们更意识到我们确实需要帮助乌克兰。”
在距离卢布林西部35公里的瓦沃尔尼察村,市长马尔钦·拉古纳(Marcin Łaguna)表示,居民对俄罗斯的恐惧日益加深,但同时对“信息过载”的紧急短信感到沮丧。
“我们这里没有任何值得摧毁的战略资产,而且无论如何,大家都知道我们没有钱建造能抵御大规模袭击的防护所。”他说,“问题是,当人们不断收到警报时,最终会忽略它们。”
瓦沃尔尼察居民埃瓦·莱纳托维奇(Ewa Lenartowicz)表示,她忽略了发送到手机上的警报,但无法入睡。
“我们在共产主义时期长大,所以家人总是会在地下室储存食物和其他应急物资……但被战斗机的轰鸣声吵醒,这是一种全新的压力。”
波兰今年将近5% 的国内生产总值(GDP)用于国防开支,成为北约最大的军事投资国之一。华沙已订购飞机、直升机和坦克,但民防投资滞后。
今年,卢布林开设了首个全封闭防护所,可容纳约200人,用于抵御化学武器和放射性粒子。该市计划在三年内升级另外101个防护所。克里什托菲克表示:“直到2024年,我们没有(政府)资金用于此类投资。”他说,“我们现在有了一些资金,但仍需时间。”
卢布林市拥有足够的地下停车场和其他避难所,可以保护人口超过450,000的大都会区免受俄罗斯无人机袭击。但只有38,000名居民目前能够在设计用于抵御俄罗斯弹道导弹更强烈打击的避难所中躲避,克里什托菲克(Krzysztofik)表示。
该市还在加紧扩展其警报喇叭网络,目前约有70%的居民能听到警报,目标是到今年年底覆盖整个卢布林大都会区。“卢布林的居民仍然过着正常的生活,但我认为这里的氛围与华沙不同了”,克里什托菲克说。
「问题在于,当人们不断收到警报时,最终会忽视它们。」
10月份,卢布林当局开始在建筑物上设置绿色和橙色的指示牌,标记疏散路线和避难所位置。最近一次关于紧急程序的会议吸引了250人参与,而夏季之前此类活动通常只有10至20名居民出席,克里什托菲克(Krzysztofik)表示。
波兰政府正在加强卢布林周边的军事部署,以应对俄罗斯的领空侵犯行为,以及混合战攻击。华沙方面将自去年11月以来发生的多起破坏行为归咎于俄罗斯,当时波兰险遭一场火车事故,卢布林通往首都的主要铁路线因爆炸装置受损而受到威胁。
上个月,国防部长瓦茨瓦夫·科西尼亚克-卡米什(Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz)宣布,将首次在卢布林机场部署“爱国者”防空导弹系统。此外,还将建立一个新的直升机基地,并增设三个额外的军事单位,包括位于附近卢科夫(Łuków)的反无人机旅。
这些增援部署旨在部分提升卢布林的安全水平,与东南部的罗兹(Rzeszów)相当,后者的机场自2022年俄罗斯全面入侵以来,已成为军事和人道主义援助乌克兰的重要枢纽。
军事存在可能安抚居民,但当地官员担心军事化可能会削弱东波兰地区的企业投资。
在瓦沃尔尼察(Wąwolnica),军方正在翻修一座桥梁,以满足其运输标准。市长拉古纳(Łaguna)对此表示欢迎,但对经济前景感到悲观:“投资者会计算一个地区是否安全,因此我们现在也有理由担心经济上落后。与俄罗斯开战的风险永远不会是吸引力所在。”
财政支持



Drone and missile warnings test nerves in region after Warsaw raises alert level
RAPHAEL MINDER — LUBLIN
In Poland's eastern city of Lublin, popular with tourists for its medieval gates and pastel facades, residents are growing used to warning sirens and the roar of fighter jets scrambled in response to the threat of Russian drones or missiles.
Locals have been receiving text alerts about possible Russian air incursions since early September, while the city's airport suspended civilian flights six times that month to make room for the military to protect Poland's airspace.
Lublin's experience shows how five years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the war has started to intrude on everyday life in neighbouring Poland. Warsaw has raised the alert level in its eastern regions of Lublin and Subcarpathia after Moscow escalated its bombing of western Ukraine in recent months by using more jet-powered drones and missiles capable of reaching as far as Polish territory. A Russian helicopter also violated Polish airspace near the Russian military base of Kaliningrad in September.
"We had perhaps been thinking too long of this war as something that could happen only on the other side of our border," said Dariusz Krzysztofik, deputy director of the public safety department in Lublin, which is located $100\mathrm{km}$ from the Ukrainian border.
“Russia is now putting a lot of effort into getting us also to panic, although I’m confident that the Russians are actually increasing our resilience and making us more conscious that we really have to help Ukraine.”
In Wąwolnica, a village 35km further west of Lublin, mayor Marcin Łaguna said residents were becoming increasingly nervous about Russia, but also frustrated by “an information overload” of emergency text messages.
“We have no strategic assets worth destroying here, and in any case everybody knows that we don’t have the money to build a shelter to protect us against a big attack,” he said. “The problem is that when people keep getting warnings, they end up ignoring them.”
Ewa Lenartowicz, a resident of Wąwolnica, said she disregarded alerts sent to her phone, but could not sleep
Clockwise from left: Dariusz Krzysztofik, deputy director of the public safety department in Lublin, at the city's crisis management centre; text alerts from the Polish government; and the entrance to a designated underground shelter
Aleksandra Kossowska/FT

Baltic Sea
KALININGRAD (RUSSIA)
POLAND
Warsaw
Łuków
Wawalzie
SUBCARPATHIA — LUBLIN
100km SLOVAKIA
MapLibre ©Mapcreator ©OpenStreetMap through the sound of military aircraft overhead. “We grew up under communism, so my family has always kept food and other emergency reserves in the cellar . . . but it’s a new kind of stress to get woken up by fighter jets,” she said.
Poland has this year allocated almost 5 per cent of GDP to defence, making it proportionately Nato's biggest military spender. Warsaw has ordered aircraft, helicopters and tanks, but investment in civilian protection has lagged behind.
This year, Lublin opened its first fully sealed shelter, capable of housing about 200 people against chemical warfare and radioactive particles. The city plans to upgrade another 101 shelters within three years. “Until 2024, we had no [government] money for such investments,” Krzysztofik said. “We now have some money, but we still need the time.”
Lublin has enough underground car parks and other shelters to protect the population of the greater metropolitan area of more than 450,000 against a Russian drone attack. But only 38,000 residents could now find refuge in shelters designed to withstand a more powerful strike from a Russian Oreshnik ballistic missile, Krzysztofik said.
The city is also racing to expand its network of warning sirens, which can be heard by about 70 per cent of residents, to cover the whole of greater Lublin by year-end. “Everybody is still enjoying a normal life in Lublin, but I think there’s now a different atmosphere than in Warsaw,” said Krzysztofik.
In October, Lublin's authorities started putting green-and-orange signposts on buildings to mark evacuation routes and shelter locations. One recent meeting on emergency procedures attracted 250 people, compared with 10-20 residents attending such events before the summer, Krzysztofik said.
The Polish government is reinforcing its military presence around Lublin in response to Russia's airspace violations but also hybrid warfare attacks. Warsaw has attributed several acts of sabotage to Russia since last November, when
Poland narrowly avoided a train crash after an explosive device damaged Lublin's main railway to the capital.
Last month, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, defence minister, announced that Patriot air-defence batteries would be deployed around Lublin airport for the first time. A new helicopter base will also be established, alongside three extra military units, including a counter-drone brigade in nearby Łuków.
The reinforcements are intended in part to bring Lublin up to the level of Rzeszów in the south-east, whose airport has served as a hub for military and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine since Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion.
The army presence may reassure residents, but local officials worry militari- sation could undermine corporate investments in eastern Poland.
In Wąwolnica, the army is renovating a bridge to meet its transport standards. Mayor Łaguna welcomes this but is pessimistic about the economy. “Investors calculate whether a region is safe, so we have plenty of reasons to worry now also about losing out economically,” he said. “The risk of war with Russia is never going to be attractive.”
Financial support
艾米·麦金农 —— 华盛顿
詹姆斯·肖特 —— 耶路撒冷
唐纳德·特朗普表示,美国将于2028年前停止向以色列提供军事援助,称该国“已经不再需要”这笔援助,并称此举是“在选民赴选举投票前的一个糟糕话题”。
特朗普昨天上午表示:“为什么我们要忍受像埃尔-赛义德这样的疯子的攻击,而以色列人不需要(援助)?”他提到民主党密歇根州参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德,后者是美国对以色列支持的强烈批评者。
美国每年向以色列提供约$4亿加元的军事援助,这是一项将于2028年到期的10年协议。由于以色列在加沙的毁灭性军事行动,这笔资金一直是激烈辩论的焦点,并在中期选举竞选中占据重要地位。
目前尚不清楚总统是否能单方面停止这笔援助,因为这笔资金是由国会批准的。虽然特朗普拥有暂停武器转移的广泛权力,但任何试图取消国会立法分配的资金都可能面临限制。
这一举动也可能在特朗普的共和党内部遭遇强烈反对。
民主党对以色列军事援助的支持急剧下降,但上个月芝加哥全球事务委员会(Chicago Council on Global Affairs)的一项民调显示,68%的共和党人支持继续或增加对以色列的军事援助。
特朗普昨天声称,他已经与以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡达成协议,停止这笔援助。
“他是提出这个问题的人。他说,‘我认为如果我们不再接受援助会更合适’,因为他理解这是他们争议的一个焦点之一。”特朗普表示。
以色列总理办公室和华盛顿以色列大使馆尚未对记者的置评请求做出回应。
内塔尼亚胡最近警告称,美国对以色列的援助可能会被削减,并表示上个月“只是时间问题”,华盛顿对以色列军事的资助将会被削减。
今年,他在一场美国电视采访中表示,他和特朗普讨论过逐步减少以色列对美国军事援助的依赖。但他表示,他曾建议在十年内逐步削减援助,并且从未公开表示同意将援助在今年内完全停止。
美国的支持在帮助以色列资助加沙战争中发挥了重要作用,该战争由哈马斯于7 2023的袭击引发,并成为以色列最长、最昂贵的冲突之一,引发军事开支激增。
根据两国之间的协议(由巴拉克·奥巴马政府签署),美国每年向以色列提供$3.3亿加元的资金,以色列可以用于购买美国武器。
该协议还包括每年$500百万加元用于联合项目,如铁穹(Iron Dome)和大卫之盾(David's Sling)等空中防御系统,这些系统用于防御无人机和导弹。
AMY MACKINNON — WASHINGTON
JAMES SHOTTER — JERUSALEM
Donald Trump has said the US will stop providing military aid to Israel at the end of the year, saying the country “no longer needed it”, and describing it as a “bad talking point” as voters headed to the polls for midterm elections.
"Why should we suffer the slings from lunatics like an El-Sayed when [Israelis] don't need it?" the president said yesterday morning, referring to Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who has been a sharp critic of US support for Israel.
The US provides almost \$4bn in annual military assistance to Israel as part of a 10-year agreement that is set to expire in 2028. The funding has been a focus of intense debate due to Israel's devastating offensive in Gaza and has featured prominently in midterm campaigning.
It was not immediately clear whether the president can unilaterally halt the funding, which is appropriated by Congress. While Trump has broad authority to pause weapons transfers, any attempt to cancel funds allocated by lawmakers could face restrictions.
The move is also likely to face significant pushback from within Trump's Republican Party.
Support for military aid to Israel has fallen sharply among Democrats but a poll last month by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs found that 68 per cent of Republicans favour continuing or increasing military aid to the country.
Trump claimed yesterday that he had reached an agreement with Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, to cut off the aid.
"He brought it up. He said, 'I think it would be appropriate if we do not receive aid', because he understands that this is one of their points of contention," Trump said.
Netanyahu's office and the Israeli embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Netanyahu has recently warned that US aid to Israel could be scaled back, saying last month it was “only a matter of time” before Washington’s funding for Israel’s military was cut.
In a US television interview this year, he said he and Trump had discussed gradually weaning Israel off US military aid. But he said he had proposed scaling back the aid over the course of a decade, and has given no public indication that he had agreed for aid to cease as soon as this year.
US support has played a significant role in helping Israel finance the war in Gaza, which was triggered by Hamas's October 7 2023 attack, and has become Israel's longest and most expensive conflict, triggering a surge in military spending.
Under the terms of the agreement between the two countries, which was signed under the administration of Barack Obama, the US provides Israel with \$3.3bn in annual funding, which it can use to purchase US weapons.
The arrangement also includes \$500mn annually for joint projects such as the Iron Dome and David's Sling air-defence systems, which protect against drones and missiles.

Choose the Financial Times subscription for you
\- React to trusted global news everywhere you go, with ft.com and FT apps
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
Trilateral talks
德米特里·塞瓦斯托普洛(Demetri Sevastopulo) —— 华盛顿
马克·塞顿(Max Seddon) —— 柏林
乔·利希(Joe Leahy) —— 北京
美国、中国和俄罗斯官员正在讨论,在本月中国深圳举办的亚太经济合作组织(APEC)峰会期间,唐纳德·特朗普、习近平和弗拉基米尔·普京三方领导人可能举行会晤。
熟悉华盛顿、北京和莫斯科局势的人士表示,官员们正在认真讨论在两周内组织首次三方领导人会晤。
普京发言人德米特里·佩斯科夫(Dmitry Peskov)告诉《金融时报》称,“正在进行组织此类会晤的工作”。
昨天稍晚些时候,佩斯科夫告诉记者,参与方对这一可能会晤的“普遍理解是,它将非常有价值且极其有用”。他补充说,习近平曾问及谣言的来源。
被问及三方峰会的可能性时,中国外交部表示北京正在“与相关方就中国和俄罗斯领导人会晤进行沟通”,但未提及特朗普。白宫未回应有关此事的置评请求。
特朗普将在两周后前往深圳出席APEC峰会,并与习近平举行今年第三次会晤。在访问前,他将飞往马尼拉出席东盟年会。
特朗普和习近平预计下月在习近平访问迈阿密出席G20峰会期间举行第四次会晤。根据中国国家媒体报道,普京和习近平已经举行了40次会晤,其中今年至少有三次。
目前尚不清楚三方是否在一起讨论,或者北京是否仅与华盛顿和莫斯科分别举行双边会谈。熟悉局势的人士警告称,作为亚太经济论坛的东道主,中国尚未决定是否继续推进会晤。
一位熟悉会谈的人士表示,华盛顿和莫斯科正在敦促中国同意举行会晤。中国外交部上月表示,其“未能提供关于可能三方峰会的任何信息”。
德国总统弗兰克-瓦尔特·施泰因迈尔(Frank-Walter Steinmeier)周日表示,习近平在上周与他会面时问及谣言的来源。他表示习近平补充说,由于战争是欧洲冲突,欧洲人应该参与其中。
举办三方会晤的一个挑战是为领导人设定一个可接受的议程。
大卫·舒尔曼(David Shullman),亚洲协会政策研究所副总裁,表示,即使没有具体议程,习近平主办华盛顿、北京和莫斯科官员会晤的象征意义将是“引人注目”的。
“习近平,其支持对俄罗斯过去四年半以来对乌克兰发动侵略战争的能力至关重要,将有机会将自己塑造成负责任的关键人物,将美国和俄罗斯带到一起,以追求稳定。”舒尔曼表示,他最近曾领导美国情报界对中国的战略分析。
舒尔曼补充道:“这将是一项非凡的外交胜利。”
一位熟悉俄罗斯思路的人士表示,莫斯科不期望在拟议中的峰会上就乌克兰进行具体讨论。
该人士表示,俄罗斯认为中国不希望在结束普京近五年入侵之前发挥主导作用,而是只在和平协议即将实现时谋求功劳。
特朗普表示他对在深圳举行三方会晤持开放态度,但强调需要关注核武器控制。
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
MAX SEDDON — BERLIN
JOE LEAHY — BEIJING
US, Chinese and Russian officials are discussing a possible meeting between Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin this month when the leaders attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Chinese city of Shenzhen.
People familiar with the situation in Washington, Beijing and Moscow said officials had been holding serious talks about arranging the first trilateral meeting between the heads of state in two weeks' time.
“Work is under way on organising such a meeting,” Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s spokesperson, told the FT.
Later yesterday, Peskov told reporters there was a “general understanding among the participants of this possible meeting that it would be worthwhile and extremely useful”.
Asked about the prospects of a trilateral summit, China's foreign ministry said Beijing was "in communication with relevant parties regarding the meeting between the Chinese and Russian heads of state" but omitted any mention of Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump will travel to Shenzhen in two weeks to attend the Apec summit and hold his third meeting this year with Xi. Before his visit, he will fly to Manila to attend the annual meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Xi and Trump are expected to hold a fourth meeting next month when the Chinese leader visits Miami for the G20. Putin and Xi have met more than 40 times in total, according to Chinese state media, including at least three times this year.
It remains unclear if the three sides are talking together or if Beijing is instead holding bilateral talks with Washington and Moscow. People familiar with the situation warned that China, which would convene the meeting as the host of the Asia-Pacific economic forum, had not yet decided whether to proceed.
One person familiar with the talks said Washington and Moscow were pressing China to agree to a meeting. The Chinese foreign ministry last month said it had “no information to provide” about a possible trilateral summit.
Germany's President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Sunday said Xi seemed confused when he asked him about a possible trilateral summit when they met in China last week. He said Xi asked about the origin of the rumours.
One challenge to hosting a three-way meeting is setting an acceptable agenda for the leaders.
Steinmeier said Xi stated there were no plans for a trilateral meeting to discuss the war in Ukraine and that the Chinese leader added Europeans should be at the table given the war was a European conflict. David Shullman, vice-president at the Asia Society Policy

Possible talks: from left, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping
Institute, said the symbolism of Xi hosting a meeting between Washington, Beijing and Moscow officials would be “striking” even without a substantive agenda.
“Xi, whose support has been indispensable to Russia’s ability to sustain its war of aggression against Ukraine for the past four and a half years, would have an opportunity to present himself as the responsible, pivotal statesman bringing the US and Russia together in pursuit of stability,” said Shullman, who until recently led the US intelligence community’s strategic analysis on China.
"It would be a remarkable diplomatic coup," Shullman added.
A person familiar with Russia's thinking said that Moscow did not expect substantive talks on Ukraine during the mooted summit.
Russia thought China did not want to take a leading role in ending Putin's nearly five-year invasion, instead only taking credit once a peace settlement was in sight, the person said.
Trump has said he is open to holding a trilateral meeting in Shenzhen but has stressed the need to focus on nuclear arms control.

随着各国加紧升级数字防务,关键AI基础设施正成为新的前线。重新思考防御策略,访问 [LombardOdier.com](http: / LombardOdier.com)
重新思考一切。
17 96
洛桑·奥迪尔
洛桑·奥迪尔·达里埃·亨施
PRIVATE BANKING ASSET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
公司债务水平保持低位
国际

As nations rush to upgrade their digital defences, critical AI infrastructure is emerging as the new frontline. Rethink Defence at LombardOdier.com
rethink everything.
17 96
LOMBARD ODIER
LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH
PRIVATE BANKING ASSET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
Companies' debt levels remain low
INTERNATIONAL
尽管日本仍保持着世界上部分最低的利率水平,但经济学家预计的利率快速上升将对一个尚未完全接受通胀结束时代的人口产生深远影响。
日本银行的主导政策利率已上升至1.25%,这是30年来的最高水平。尽管这仍然远低于年通胀率,但显著的利率上升可能终结银行储蓄(主要由日本老年人持有)的贬值,同时使年轻人购买房产和消费品变得更加困难。
经济学家将这种利率快速上升描述为“代际战争”,甚至比贫富差距更严重。奥克斯福德经济学(Oxford Economics)日本首席经济学家奈加志贺(Shigeto Nagai)表示:
“就整体家庭而言,利率上升将是有利的,因为他们拥有大量存款。但如果你年龄在30到40岁之间,想要贷款买房但尚未积累老年人那样的资产,那么你将承受最严重的打击。”
伊藤忠研究所(Itochu Research Institute)高级经济学家高野素多(Sota Takano)补充道:“对于拥有大量存款的家庭来说,利率上升是有利的。但如果你年龄在30,到40,之间,想要贷款买房但没有老年人那样的资产积累,那么你将承受最严重的打击。”
46岁的法律专业人士松井吾基(Goki Masui)显然感到自己是获胜者之一。他购买了东京大都会区的一套房产,该地区的房价比日本其他地区上涨幅度更大,并且不担心更高的贷款成本。
松井表示:“我拥有一套房产,其价值自2011.以来已大幅上涨。查看我的资产负债表,我完全没有问题。但对于年轻人来说,利率上升、贷款难度增加,房价本身也高,他们无法购买房产。”
对于30岁的横口悠人(Yuto Horiguchi)来说,贷款买房的想法甚至让他感到可笑。他说道:“我没有这种奢侈的能力。我需要我的工资上涨。”
尽管日本工资最终开始以超过通胀的速度增长,但横口是许多同龄东京人之一,他们的收入未能跟上房价上涨的步伐。
根据伊藤忠研究所的高野,全国范围内,住宅房价在2025,上涨了4.4%,与年轻工作者的工资增长基本持平。但在东京中心区,房价上涨了8.3%。
高野表示:“年轻购房者面临的主要挑战一直是房价的急剧上涨。从现在开始,上升的抵押贷款利率可能会使房屋所有权变得越来越难以实现。”
图表来源:
日本大多数人选择可变利率抵押贷款,这是因为近期利率一直处于极低水平。约75%的新抵押贷款在日本是可变利率贷款,这一比例远高于欧元区、美国或英国。
尽管利率看起来将上升,但许多借款人仍不愿放弃可变利率抵押贷款。根据东京的一家抵押中介公司Mogecheck的数据,目前可变利率抵押贷款的平均利率约为1.3%至1.6%,而35年固定利率贷款的利率则为3.8%。日本9月份的核心消费者价格年通胀率为2.1%。
一位不愿透露姓名的28岁金融行业工作者表示,他于9月份以1%的可变利率贷款了35年、¥4700万(约合$300,000)的住房贷款。他目前的月还款额为¥110,000,如果按照3%的固定利率贷款,每月的还款额将显著上升。
“我想利用低贷款成本积累资产,”他说道,“最近股价上涨,我希望投资的资产能够增长。”
一些借款人还在延长贷款期限,甚至申请了50年期的贷款。
内阁府的模拟显示,如果抵押贷款利率上升1个百分点,三十岁左右的贷款持有人每年将额外承担约¥240,000的利息负担,相当于可支配收入的约4%。
在许多贷款机构的还款条款下,即使利率上升,每月的还款额在5年内也保持不变。但由于借款人每月还款的本金较少,这将问题推迟到未来。
Mogecheck的执行官Takashi Shiozawa表示,尽管抵押贷款的通胀调整后利率仍为负值,但日本银行(BoJ)正在缩小这一差距。他警告称,银行最近几个月开始收紧50年期贷款的贷款标准。他说道:“人们越来越担心是否应该现在购房,因为担心随着抵押贷款利率上升,房价可能会下跌。”
日本仍然是一个低杠杆经济体,但更高的利率仍将影响消费者借款,从购车到奢侈品。
根据日本汽车制造商协会的数据,现金仍然是购车最常见的支付方式,传统贷款和汽车制造商的融资分别被约15%的购车者使用。
汽车制造商日产表示,随着融资成本上升,贷款人不得不在多年保持稳定的情况下提高利率。日产表示,随着汽车价格上涨,经销商发现融资讨论变得越来越困难。
这种压力也开始出现在消费支出的其他领域。二手奢侈品零售商Allu在8月份表示,由于利率上升,将某些购物贷款的免息分期付款期限从60期缩短至24期,缩短了客户分摊购买成本的期限。
位于东京东北部茨城县的稻农Takahiro Yamaguchi希望将其稻田面积扩大50%,这是一种能够帮助日本应对劳动力收缩和低粮食自给率的大规模农业转型。但稻米价格下跌和购买自动拖拉机等机械的贷款利率上升使得Yamaguchi感到谨慎。仓库贷款正变成一个负担。
“We’d like to push ahead as fast as we can but there is a possibility we could be stopped in our tracks,” he said. “考虑到目前的利率,我们可能不得不推迟一年。”
小型企业是日本在利率上升时最脆弱的公司之一。Oxford Economics估计,借款利率上升1个百分点可能将亏损小型企业的比例从27%提高到31%。
经济学家表示,利润下降可能会对资本支出产生连锁负面影响,从而影响小型企业的竞争力以及它们为日本70%的劳动力提供工资的能力。
日本金融企业研究所(政府所有的贷款机构)研究员中野正基(Masaki Nakano)表示,半导体和AI的强劲需求正在抵消利率上升带来的紧缩效应。但进一步的利率上升可能会导致“强弱企业之间差距的扩大”,他表示。
位于东京的精密制造商富士精机(Fuji Seiki)负责人藤野正幸(Masayuki Fujino)表示,更高的利率“就像拳击中一系列的出拳,逐渐产生越来越大的影响”。
一个摆脱通缩的更活跃的经济最终可能会超过任何短期内高利率带来的痛苦,特别是对于正在积极储蓄和投资的年轻日本人。年龄在30岁以下的家庭是唯一一个金融资产增长最快的年龄组——从2019年到2024年,其金融资产平均增长了62%,达到¥3.2百万。
然而,这些家庭仍然比年龄在60岁左右的家庭明显贫穷,后者平均持有¥23.4百万的金融资产。
77岁的广告业老板近藤健夫(Takeo Kondo)是许多年长的日本人之一,他们将从更好的储蓄回报中受益。
“对我来说,几乎没有什么负面影响,”他表示。
财务省表示,尽管五年期银行存款的回报率仍然远低于通胀率,一些年长的零售投资者已经将资金转移到收益更高的政府债券和上涨的股票市场中。
在日本家庭中,截至2026年6月的一年内,持有现金和存款的金融资产比例下降了5个百分点,而持有证券的比例上升了6个百分点,根据日本金融企业研究所(Japan Finance Corporation)的数据。
While older savers are in line to benefit, younger people will find it difficult to buy homes and goods
Younger households have fewer assets and more housing debt, leaving them more exposed to interest rate rises


Households with two or more people. Assumes 1 percentage point increase in the policy rate, with fixed pass-through ratio from the policy rate to each interest rate
Sources: Oxford Economics; Ministry of Internal Affairs


Sources: Oxford Economics; Ministry of Finance • Data from 1985-2026
Property prices in central Tokyo, below, have risen at nearly double the national average Philip Fong/AFP/Getty Images
DAVID KEOHANE, HARRY DEMPSEY AND JANA TAUSCHINSKI — TOKYO
Japan may still have some of the lowest interest rates in the world, but the rapid increase expected by economists will have far-reaching implications for a population still coming to terms with the end of an era of deflation.
At 1.25 per cent, the Bank of Japan's main policy rate is already at its highest in 30 years. That is still well below annual inflation, but substantial rate increases could end the erosion of the value of bank savings, mostly held by older Japanese, while making it harder for younger people to buy homes and consumer goods.
The rapid increase in interest rates is shaping up to be a “war between generations”, as much as between rich and poor, said Shigeto Nagai, chief Japan economist at Oxford Economics.
“For households overall, interest rate increases are going to be positive because of the massive deposits they hold,” said Sota Takano, senior economist at Itochu Research Institute. “But if you are aged 30 to 40, and you want to get a mortgage but have not built up the kind of assets older people have, then you are going to be hit the hardest.”
Goki Masui, a 46-year-old legal professional, certainly feels like a winner. He bought a home in Greater Tokyo, where property prices have risen much more than in many areas of Japan, and is untroubled by the prospect of higher borrowing costs.
"I own a home and its value has skyrocketed since 2011. Looking at my balance sheet, I feel there's no problem at all," Masui said. "But for young people, interest rates are going up, money is hard to borrow and house prices themselves are high, so they can't buy them."
For Yuto Horiguchi, 30, the very idea of taking out a housing loan is laughable. "I don't have that sort of luxury," he said. "I need my wages to go up."
While Japanese wages are at last rising faster than inflation, Horiguchi is one of many people of his age in Tokyo who have not seen their incomes keep up with property prices.
Nationwide, residential property prices rose 4.4 per cent in 2025, broadly in line with wage growth among younger workers, according to Takano at Itochu. But in central Tokyo, property prices jumped 8.3 per cent.
"The main challenge for younger homebuyers until now has been the sharp rise in property prices," Takano said. "From here, rising mortgage rates are likely to make home ownership increasingly difficult as well."
The vast majority of Japanese take out variable-rate mortgages due to the recent history of rock-bottom rates. Roughly 75 per cent of new mortgages in Japan are variable, a far higher proportion than in the euro area, US or UK.
Even as rates look set to rise, many borrowers are unwilling to abandon variable-rate mortgages. According to Mogecheck, a mortgage broker in Tokyo, such mortgages currently carry average interest rates of about 1.3 to 1.6 per cent compared with 3.8 per cent for 35-year fixed-rate loans. Japan's headline consumer price annual inflation rate was 2.1 per cent in September.
A 28-year-old finance sector worker who declined to be named said he took out a 35-year, ¥47mn (\$300,000) housing loan in September at a variable rate of 1 per cent. His monthly payments of ¥110,000 would have risen significantly at the 3 per cent rate offered under a fixed-rate mortgage.
"I wanted to take advantage of those low borrowing costs and build up my assets," he said. "Stock prices have been rising recently so I'm hoping that the assets I have invested there will grow."
Some borrowers are also pushing out the length of mortgages, even taking out 50-year loans.
A Cabinet Office simulation found a one percentage point increase in mortgage rates would leave holders in their thirties with an average additional annual interest burden of about ¥240,000, equivalent to roughly 4 per cent of disposable income.

Under repayment terms offered by many lenders, monthly payments stay unchanged for five years even if interest rates rise. But since borrowers repay less principal per month, that pushes any problems further down the road.
Takashi Shiozawa, an executive with Mogecheck, said that while inflation-adjusted mortgage rates remained negative, the BoJ was narrowing that gap. He warned that banks had begun tightening lending standards for 50-year mortgages in recent months. “People are increasingly wondering whether they should buy now because they’re worried that, as mortgage rates rise, property prices could fall,” Shiozawa said.
Japan remains a low-leverage economy, but higher rates will still affect consumer borrowing from car purchases to luxury goods.
According to the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, cash remains the most common way to buy a car, with conventional loans and automakers' financing each used by about 15 per cent of buyers.
'People are wondering whether they should buy now because they're worried that, as mortgage rates rise, property prices could fall'
Carmaker Nissan said rising funding costs had forced lenders to increase rates after years of keeping them steady. Dealers were finding financing discussions increasingly difficult as cars became more expensive, it said.
The squeeze is also emerging in other areas of consumer spending. Second-hand luxury goods retailer Allu said in August it was cutting the number of interest-free instalments available on some shopping loans from 60 to 24 because of rising rates, shortening the period over which customers could spread the cost of purchases.
Takahiro Yamaguchi wants to expand his rice farm in Ibaraki Prefecture north-east of Tokyo by 50 per cent, the kind of shift to larger-scale agriculture that would help Japan address its low self-sufficiency in food as its workforce contracts. But a slump in rice prices and rising interest rates on loans to buy autonomous tractors and other machinery make Yamaguchi cautious. A loan for a warehouse is becoming a burden.
“We’d like to push ahead as fast as we can but there is a possibility we could be stopped in our tracks,” he said. “Taking today’s interest rates into account, we might end up delaying it a year.”
Small businesses are among Japan's more vulnerable companies as interest rates rise. Oxford Economics estimates a one percentage point increase in borrowing rates could push the proportion of lossmaking small businesses from 27 per cent to 31 per cent.
Economists said lower profits could have knock-on negative effects on capital spending, and therefore small enterprises' competitiveness and ability to raise wages for the 70 per cent of the Japanese workforce they employ.
Masaki Nakano at the Research Institute of Japan Finance Corporation, a government-owned lender, said strong demand for semiconductors and AI was outweighing the tightening effect of higher interest rates. But further increases could lead to a “widening of the gaps” between stronger and weaker companies, he said.
Masayuki Fujino, who runs Fuji Seiki, a precision manufacturer in Tokyo, said higher rates were “like the damage from a series of jabs in boxing, gradually having more and more of an effect”.
A more vibrant economy liberated from deflation could eventually outweigh any short-term pain from higher rates for younger Japanese, who are already saving and investing more. Households headed by someone under 30 have the fastest growth in financial assets of any age group – jumping 62 per cent between 2019 and 2024 to an average of ¥3.2mn, government data shows.
But they remain substantially poorer than households headed by someone in their sixties, which hold an average of ¥23.4mn in financial assets.
Takeo Kondo, 77-year-old owner of a signage business, is one of the many elderly Japanese who would benefit from better returns on their savings.
"There aren't really any downsides for me," he said.
With returns on even five-year bank deposits still well below inflation, the finance ministry says some older retail investors have been moving money into higher-yielding government bonds and the rising stock market.
Across Japanese households, the proportion of financial assets held in cash and deposits fell five percentage points in the year to June 2026, while the share held in securities rose six points, according to the Japan Research Institute.
US veteran
德米特里·塞瓦斯托普洛 —— 华盛顿
乔治·哈蒙德 —— 旧金山
开放式人工智能(OpenAI💡)公司聘请了前美国陆军部长丹·德里斯科尔(Dan Driscoll),他曾因与国防部长佩特·赫格塞斯(Pete Hegseth)的紧张关系而辞职。随着美国试图扩大人工智能在国家和网络安全领域的应用,这一招聘被视为军方的重要举措。
这位伊拉克战争老兵,也是副总统乔·范斯(JD Vance)的密友,将加入该公司担任新设立的国家安全现代化高级顾问一职,OpenAI告诉《金融时报》。位于旧金山的这家公司表示,德里斯科尔将专注于与美国盟友合作,推动人工智能的负责任使用。
“丹将与OpenAI团队和来自政府、产业、学术界及盟国机构的领导者合作,推动实用现代化倡议,以推进民主型人工智能的建设。”公司表示。它还补充称,德里斯科尔将帮助其团队“理解全球国家安全机构的运营需求”。
在五角大楼期间,德里斯科尔推动了一系列改革,旨在更快引入新技术并提高武器的互操作性。今年早些时候,他组织了一场名为“Operation Jailbreak”(解锁行动)的黑客马拉松,以改善武器通信,并借鉴乌克兰战争的经验教训。
这位40岁的前国防官员曾因与赫格塞斯在五角大楼首脑解雇多名备受尊敬的陆军军官一事产生分歧。德里斯科尔被认为将在任何可能的2028年总统竞选中发挥关键作用。
“国家安全需求正以50年来最快的速度变化。”德里斯科尔表示,“我加入OpenAI是为了帮助美国及其盟友将这一技术负责任地应用于保护我们安全的人群。”
OpenAI首席执行官萨姆·奥特曼(Sam Altman)表示,美国有机会与各国合作推广民主型人工智能的采用,而德里斯科尔将“加强美国领导力,帮助我们实现这一目标”。OpenAI表示,德里斯科尔将为公私部门合作伙伴提供政策现代化建议,并“解锁人工智能在提升国家安全和支持民主原则方面的实际应用”。
OpenAI已为多个欧洲国家(包括法国、德国和波兰)提供网络防御服务,并为这些国家提供其模型的访问权限。它还允许乌克兰政府使用名为“Daybreak”(黎明)的程序,帮助识别软件漏洞。
OpenAI及其竞争对手正在开发的工具被视为美国国家安全的关键,既是防御手段,也是潜在的脆弱点。
今年早些时候,OpenAI扩大了与五角大楼的合作关系,同意在分类环境部署其人工智能模型,这发生在竞争对手Anthropic与赫格塞斯谈判破裂之后。
OpenAI今年被广泛预期将上市,但已将上市推迟至明年,并计划在本月通过一轮私募融资筹集$20亿。
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
GEORGE HAMMOND — SAN FRANCISCO
OpenAI has hired Dan Driscoll, the former US Army secretary who resigned following tensions with defence secretary Pete Hegseth, as the military seeks to expand its use of AI to enhance national and cyber security.
The Iraq war veteran and close friend of vice-president JD Vance will join the group in a newly created role as senior counsellor for national security modernisation, OpenAI told the FT.
The San Francisco-based group added that Driscoll would focus on working with American allies to advance the responsible use of AI.
“Dan will work with OpenAI teams and leaders across governments, industry, academia and allied institutions to advance practical modernisation initiatives to advance the build-out of democratic AI,” the company said. It added that Driscoll would help its teams “understand the operational needs of global national security institutions”.
At the Pentagon, Driscoll drove reform efforts aimed at introducing new technology more quickly and making weapons more interoperable. Earlier this year, he organised a hackathon called Operation Jailbreak to improve communications between weapons using lessons learnt in Ukraine.
The 40-year-old former defence official who clashed with Hegseth over the Pentagon chief's firing of several widely respected army officers has been tipped to play a senior role in any potential Vance 2028 presidential campaign.
“National security requirements are changing faster than at any time in the past 50 years,” Driscoll said. “I’m joining OpenAI to help the US and our allies put this technology to work responsibly, for the people who keep us safe.”
OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the US had an opportunity to work with countries to spread the adoption of democratic AI and that Driscoll would “strengthen American leadership and help us do that”. OpenAI said Driscoll would advise public and private sector partners on modernising policy and ways to “unlock practical uses of AI to improve national security and . . . support democratic principles”.
OpenAI has provided cyber defence in several European countries, including France, Germany and Poland, with access to its models. It has also allowed the Ukrainian government to access a programme called Daybreak designed to help identify software vulnerabilities.
The tools being developed by OpenAI and its rivals are regarded as critical to US national security, both as a form of defence and as a potential vulnerability.
Earlier this year, OpenAI expanded its relationship with the Pentagon, agreeing to deploy its AI models in classified settings following the collapse of talks between rival Anthropic and Hegseth.
OpenAI was widely expected to go public this year, having confidentially filed its initial public offering prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission in June. But it has deferred its listing until next year and is instead seeking to raise \$20bn in a private funding round this month.
Adam Tooze see Opinion
Theft accusations
马尔顿·杜奈(MARTON DUNAI) —— 布达佩斯
塞尔维亚当局已逮捕了阿尔塔银行(Alta Bank)的行长,并指控其在亚历山大·武契奇(Aleksandar Vučić)最近的选举失利后,从银行保险柜中提走现金。
塞尔维亚警方昨日表示,达沃尔·马库拉(Davor Macura)及另外两名银行官员在银行总部和马库拉家中遭到搜查后被逮捕。警方补充称,马库拉被指控非法从银行保险柜中提走超过3.8亿欧元的现金。
塞尔维亚国家银行(National Bank of Serbia)周六宣布撤销阿尔塔银行的营业执照,称该银行在客户(其中许多人为俄罗斯公民)大规模提现和数百万欧元资金流出后,面临财务和流动性压力。
阿尔塔银行和马库拉是塞尔维亚在武契奇12年独裁统治在10月25日学生领导的运动击败其塞尔维亚进步党(SNS)后结束的反腐行动的首批目标。武契奇曾在辞去总统职务后宣布提前选举,试图保住权力。
检方称,马库拉的同谋——阿尔塔银行的现金管理部门主管和现金运营助理,“将(马库拉)的保险柜存取卡交给他,或者通过使用自己的卡片并陪同他进入‘Depo’保险柜,未经授权进入”。检方表示,“在这些未经授权的进入过程中,(马库拉)被指控从保险柜中提走现金,从而非法获取约450亿塞尔维亚第纳尔的财务利益”。
MARTON DUNAI — BUDAPEST
Serbian authorities have detained the owner of Alta Bank and accused him of emptying the deposit vault after Aleksandar Vučić's recent election loss.
Davor Macura and two other bank officials were arrested following searches at the bank's premises and Macura's home, Serbian police said yesterday. Macura is suspected of illegally removing more than €380mn worth of cash from the bank's vault, they added.
The National Bank of Serbia on Saturday revoked Alta Bank's operating licence, saying it had come under a financial and liquidity strain after its clients, many of Russian nationality, made large withdrawals and millions of euros left the country last week.
Alta Bank and Macura were among the first targets of an anti-corruption drive following the fall of Vučić, whose authoritarian 12-year rule ended when a student-led movement defeated his SNS party in October 25 elections. Vučić had called the snap vote after resigning as president, hoping to retain power.
Macura's alleged accomplices, the director of Alta's treasury and cash management department and a treasury operations associate, “handed [Macura] their access cards to the vault or enabled him to enter the ‘Depo’ vault without authorisation by using their own cards and accompanying him”, the prosecutors said. “During these unauthorised entries, [Macura] allegedly removed money from the vault, thereby obtaining an unlawful financial benefit of approximately 45bn dinars.”
阿尔塔银行的母公司曾因涉嫌洗钱而受到欧洲中央银行(ECB)关注,作为其试图收购奥地利银行阿迪科银行(Addiko)的一部分。ECB质疑该银行是否能验证存款的合法来源,并表示“未发现任何违规行为”。阿尔塔银行曾表示,ECB没有发现任何违规行为。
贝尔格莱德刑事辩护律师利利扬娜·博罗维奇(Ljiljana Borovic)表示,阿尔塔银行从贝尔格莱德郊区的一家小外汇兑换所发展成为一家系统性银行,是在其收购一家塞尔维亚国有银行并承接政府业务后实现的。
该银行也是唯一一家为俄罗斯企业和个人提供服务的银行,在2022年乌克兰全面入侵后,数万俄罗斯人抵达塞尔维亚后,其资产负债表迅速扩大。
博罗维奇表示:“银行的快速增长、分支机构和办公室数量的巨增,以及在极短时间内扩展业务范围至其他业务领域和邻国,都引发了金融和银行专家的合理关切。”
塞尔维亚国家银行和武契奇的塞尔维亚进步党(SNS)未回复置评请求。马库拉否认有罪,在被捕前告诉《金融时报》,他的银行是“持续的敌对宣传、泄密和暗示攻击”的目标。
Raiffeisen Bank International表示,该银行原本被选中接管阿迪科并出售部分阿迪科资产给阿尔塔银行,但现在不再期望阿尔塔“获得监管批准”。Raiffeisen Bank International表示,它“预计将保有阿迪科所有子公司的所有权,包括塞尔维亚的子公司”。
Alta's parent company has faced scrutiny from the European Central Bank over suspected money laundering as part of an attempt to acquire an Austrian lender, Addiko, with the ECB questioning whether the bank could verify the legitimate origin of deposits. Alta had said the ECB found no wrongdoing.
Ljiljana Borovic, a Belgrade criminal defence lawyer, said that Alta had grown from a small money exchange office on the outskirts of Belgrade into a systemic bank after it acquired a Serbian state-owned lender and took on government business.
The bank was also the only one that catered to Russian businesses and individuals alike, growing its balance sheet after the arrival of tens of thousands of Russians following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
"The bank's rapid growth, the enormous increase in the number of its branches and offices, and the expansion of its operations into other business sectors and neighbouring countries within an exceptionally short period of time raised legitimate concerns among financial and banking experts," Borovic said.
The National Bank of Serbia and Vučić's SNS party did not respond to requests for comment. Macura has denied wrongdoing, telling the FT before his arrest that his bank was a target of “a sustained campaign of hostile briefing, leaks and insinuation”.
Austrian lender Raiffeisen Bank International, which had been selected to take over Addiko and sell some Addiko assets to Alta in a carve-out, said it “expects to remain owner of all of Addiko’s subsidiaries, including the one in Serbia” as it no longer expected Alta “to get regulatory approval”.
Central bank
奥拉夫·斯托贝克 —— 法兰克福
帕奥拉·塔玛 —— 柏林
布鲁塞尔方面给予欧元区21个成员国政府仅数天时间提名下一任欧洲中央银行(ECB)行长候选人,表明寻找克里斯蒂娜·拉加德(Christine Lagarde)接班人的竞争可能将迅速进入白热化阶段。
欧盟财政部长理事会主席、希腊财政部长基里亚科斯·皮拉卡基斯(Kyriakos Pierrakakis)呼吁欧元区21个成员国于周五前提交候选人提名,负责协调欧元区政策的机构发言人昨日表示。
拉加德上周宣布,她将于2024年2月7日卸任ECB行长职务,比其八年任期结束前提前九个月。拉加德的八年任期将于2027年结束。
欧洲最具影响力的货币当局领导层的更替发生在该地区正面临另一轮通胀浪潮和投资者对法国公共财政状况及其4月总统选举前政治稳定性的担忧之际。
拉加德上周表示,她希望“在货币政策之外的其他事务上有更大的表达自由”。她还与世界经济论坛就成为其下一任主席一事进行了接触。
ECB行长及其执行委员会的其他五名成员由使用欧元的21个国家的领导人任命,并与欧洲议会和ECB进行磋商。成功的候选人需获得至少16个国家的支持,这些国家代表欧元区65%的人口。
欧盟领导人将于本月两次会晤,并在12月再次会晤,预计将在今年年底前就拉加德的接任人以及2027年将空缺的执行委员会其他两个席位做出决定。
离任行长:克里斯蒂娜·拉加德将于2月7日卸任
ECB执行委员会成员伊莎贝尔·施纳贝尔(Isabel Schnabel)将于1月加入国际货币基金组织(IMF),而央行首席经济学家菲利普·莱恩(Philip Lane)的八年任期将于5月底到期。
巴塞尔银行(Bank for International Settlements)总经理帕布洛·埃尔南德斯·德科斯(Pablo Hernández de Cos)和前荷兰央行行长克拉斯·诺特(Klaas Knot)被视为2024年2月后ECB第五任行长的热门人选。
埃尔南德斯·德科斯被认为是一位温和派经济学家,而诺特则享有鹰派声誉。然而,熟悉其观点的人士强调,两人都是务实派,致力于在决策者之间达成共识,并不固守意识形态立场。
德国上月表示不会争夺ECB行长职位后,拉加德接任人的意外外部候选人可能性扩大。
但观察人士警告,新的候选人仍可能在最后关头出现。据熟悉各国讨论的消息人士透露,法国正在瞄准ECB首席经济学家职位,该职位被视为第二重要。
OLAF STORBECK — FRANKFURT
PAOLA TAMMA — BERLIN
Brussels has given Eurozone governments just days to nominate candidates to be the next president of the European Central Bank, signalling that the race to find Christine Lagarde's successor could come to a head quickly.
Kyriakos Pierrakakis, president of the Eurogroup and Greek finance minister, called on the bloc's 21 member states to submit their nominations by Friday, a spokesperson for the body co-ordinating Eurozone policy said yesterday.
Lagarde announced last week that she will step down as ECB president on February 7, nine months before the end of her eight-year term.
The change in leadership at Europe's most powerful monetary authority comes as the region is in the throes of another wave of inflation and growing investor concern over the state of France's public finances and political stability in the run-up to its presidential elections in April.
Lagarde said last week that she wanted “greater freedom to express her views” on matters other than monetary policy. She has also been in talks with the World Economic Forum over becoming its next chair.
The ECB president and the five other members of its executive board are appointed by the leaders of the 21 countries that use the euro, after consulting with the European parliament and the ECB. A successful candidate needs the support of at least 16 countries representing 65 per cent of the euro area's population.
EU leaders, who will meet twice this month and again in December, are expected to make a decision before the end of the year on both Lagarde's replacement and two other seats on the executive board that will also become vacant in 2027.

Departing head: Christine Lagarde will step down on February 7
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel will leave to join the IMF in January, while the central bank's chief economist Philip Lane's eight-year term will expire in late May.
Pablo Hernández de Cos, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, and Klaas Knot, the former Dutch central bank governor, are seen as frontrunners to become the fifth ECB president from February.
Hernández de Cos is viewed as a more dovish economist while Knot has a hawkish reputation. However, people familiar with their views stress that both are pragmatists who are keen to forge consensus among policymakers and are not wedded to ideological positions.
After Germany last month signalled that it would not seek the ECB presidency, the odds on a surprise outside candidate to replace Lagarde widened.
But observers warn that new names could still emerge at the eleventh hour. According to people familiar with discussions in various capitals, France is eyeing the ECB chief economist role, seen as the second most important.

Inspiration is the power to look forward, to shape the unseen, turning the present into something iconic.
/ TOMORROW'S TIMELESS
SANLORENZO
澳洲央行今年第五次加息,因通胀持续超目标,经济面临高失业率和房价暴跌压力
尼克·菲尔德斯 —— 悉尼
澳大利亚储备银行(RBA)昨日将利率上调0.25个百分点至4.85%,这是其今年第五次加息,并警告称通胀前景“显著上升”,燃料、大宗商品和AI相关投资推高了价格。央行表示,预计通胀不会在2026年晚些时候才降至其2%至3%的目标区间内(此前已连续两年超目标),比之前的预期推迟了三个季度。
上周公布的官方数据显示,剔除易波动项目(如燃料)的核心通胀率在截至9月的12个月内上升至3.6%,较上月略有上升,而整体通胀率则上升至4.3%。
RBA行长米歇尔·布洛克(Michele Bullock)在记者会上表示,今年第五次加息反映了通胀前景恶化。她说:“我知道这不是澳大利亚人想听到的消息,但这是澳大利亚经济所需的。”布洛克补充称,高通胀影响所有人,而不仅仅是按揭持有人。她说:“这是澳大利亚经济正确的选择。”
澳元在宣布加息后一度贬值0.35%,跌破0.70加元 / 澳元,这一加息举动在预期之中,且投票结果为6比3。
此次加息发生在墨尔本杯马赛(澳大利亚最大的年度体育赛事)即将开始前,加剧了对经济健康状况的担忧,因为房价持续下滑,失业率上升至4.7%。这也将对总理安东尼·阿尔巴尼斯(Anthony Albanese)的政府施加压力,该政府已表示将于下月削减公共支出。政府多次将通胀上升归咎于外部因素,包括中东战争。HSBC澳大利亚首席经济学家保罗·布洛克汉姆(Paul Bloxham)表示,澳大利亚经济“可能陷入衰退”的风险存在,“我们将其风险评估为50-50”。
布洛克表示,央行的基准预测并未预见衰退,但警告称,随着房价暴跌和失业率上升,许多澳大利亚人可能会认为已经发生了衰退。她说:“我认为这将让人们感到像是衰退,因为他们感到更穷了。”
AMP首席经济学家肖恩·奥利弗(Shane Oliver)表示,累积加息将使许多房主的年按揭利息支出增加澳元$6,600(约合$4,610加元)。他在一份备忘录中表示:“我们可能已经接近某些按揭持有人的临界点。”
此次加息举动也使RBA与其他央行(如美国联邦储备委员会、欧洲央行、日本银行和新西兰储备银行)脱节,这些央行在最近的会议上选择保持利率不变。
布洛克表示,央行采取激进策略是为了减少澳大利亚经济中的过度需求。她补充称,澳大利亚通胀目标与月度读数之间的差距在各个市场中普遍类似。她说:“我不会说我们完全孤立无援。”

INTERNATIONAL
Central bank
RBA's fifth increase this year comes as inflation remains above target
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Australia's central bank has raised interest rates to an 18-year high as it warned inflation remained above target in an economy grappling with high unemployment and a collapse in house prices.
The Reserve Bank of Australia yesterday opted to raise interest rates by 0.25 percentage points to 4.85 per cent, its fifth increase this year, as it said the inflation outlook was now “materially higher”, with fuel, commodities and AIrelated investments driving up prices. The bank said it did not expect inflation to drop into its target range of 2 to 3 per cent – which it has been above for two years – until late next year, three quarters later than previously forecast.
Official data released last week showed underlying inflation – which strips out volatile items such as fuel – hit 3.6 per cent in the year to September, a slight rise on the month before, while overall inflation was up 4.3 per cent.
RBA governor Michele Bullock told reporters the central bank's fifth rate rise in 2026 reflected a worsening inflation outlook. “I know this is not the news many Australians wanted to hear but it is what is needed,” she said.
Bullock added that high inflation affected everyone, not just mortgage holders. "This is the right thing for the Australian economy," she said.
The Australian dollar weakened as much as 0.35 per cent to under US\$0.70 following the announcement of the rise, which was widely expected, and was decided in a 6-3 vote.
The latest rate move, which arrived shortly before the start of the Melbourne Cup horse race, one of Australia's biggest annual sporting events, added to growing concerns about the health of the economy with house prices slumping and unemployment rising to 4.7 per cent last month.
It will also heap pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government, which has signalled that it is preparing to cut public spending next month. The government has repeatedly pointed to external factors, including the war in the Middle East, as key factors driving inflation. Paul Bloxham, chief economist at HSBC Australia, said there was “a risk the Australian economy tips into recession”, adding: “We put the risk at a 50-50 chance.”
Bullock said the central bank's baseline forecast did not foresee a recession but warned that, with house prices tumbling and unemployment rising, many Australians may perceive one had arrived. "I think that is going to make people feel like it's a recession because they feel poorer," she said.
Shane Oliver, chief economist at AMP, said the cumulative rate rises would increase annual mortgage interest payments for many homeowners by A\$6,600 (US\$4,610) a year. “We may be close to a tipping point for some mortgage holders,” he said in a note.
The rate move also put the RBA out of step with other central banks, such as the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, which opted to hold rates at recent meetings.
Bullock said the bank's aggressive strategy was needed to reduce excess demand in the Australian economy. She added the disparity between the RBA's inflation targets and monthly readings was broadly similar across different markets. "I wouldn't say we're completely Robinson Crusoe here," she said.
来源:Cotality;FT计算 • * 数据包括布里斯班和黄金海岸。数据截至2026年10月29日
澳大利亚自1980年以来经历了多次房价调整
澳大利亚试图解决房地产危机的措施包括默契理解,即这些措施将导致房价下降,在全球最昂贵的房地产市场中,投资者退出市场。
自当局在5月解除促进房地产繁荣的激励措施以来,近6个月来,在通胀上升和利率上调的背景下,影响比预期更为严重。
该国正面临40年来最严重的房地产调整,一些经济学家担心这可能演变为经济危机。巴里·哈罗普(Barrie Harrop)表示:“自1982年以来,澳大利亚市场经历了9次房价调整,但目前这一轮可能是最严重的。”哈罗普是一位自1970年代以来的房地产开发商。
根据房地产研究公司Cotality的数据,自3月份以来,房价已经下跌了5.2%。当时,安东尼·阿尔巴内塞(Anthony Albanese)政府结束了对拥有多套房产者的税收优惠和资本利得折扣。
分析师预测,随着房屋不再成为许多富裕澳大利亚人的主要投资来源,房价将下跌5%至10%。
但一些经济学家现在预计,到明年年底,房价可能从峰值下跌至15%。
澳大利亚储备银行(RBA)昨日第五次上调今年的利率,因为通胀率在9月份同比上升至4.3%,高于8月份的4%,远高于其目标范围。
AMP首席经济学家兼投资策略负责人肖恩·奥利弗(Shane Oliver)表示,利率上调可能会将房价下跌推向15%的水平,并可能增加困境房主的数量。
“房价正遭受利率上调、投资者税收上调、低迷的信心和低迷的购买力共同打击,导致需求下降,”他表示。
这在全国各地每周举行的拍卖中表现明显。Cotality的数据显示,虽然天气变暖导致更多房屋上市,但上市量仍比去年低40%。
同时,在过去四周中,澳大利亚各大城市中成交的房屋销售量已降至50%以下。
房地产列表公司Domain表示,自1990年代初以来,房价最严重的季度下跌记录在三个月内发生,即截至9月份。
悉尼房屋的中位数价值在该期间下跌了超过澳元82,000元(约合57,800加元)。悉尼房屋的中位数价值在该期间下跌了超过澳元82,000元(约合57,800加元)。
不寻常的是,房价下跌影响了所有州的首府城市,从达尔文的季度下跌澳元20,000元,到珀斯的接近澳元90,000元。
摩根士丹利表示,如果房价下跌12.5%,澳大利亚的房地产市场将遭遇自1982年以来最大的调整,这将与1890年代和1930年代的经济萧条期间的房地产崩盘相提并论。
该银行还将明年GDP增长预期从1.4%下调至1.1%,并预测失业率将从4.7%上升至5.1%。
市场经济公司(Market Economics)总裁斯蒂芬·库库拉斯(Stephen Koukouulas)表示,房价下跌有助于提高住房负担能力,但也存在风险。库库拉斯曾是朱莉娅·吉拉德(Julia Gillard)工党政府的顾问。
“房价下跌是个大问题。我现在紧张得像猫在满屋子摇晃的椅子间一样,”他说道。“政府不希望出现衰退,但每周衰退的可能性都在加大。”
在经济恶化的问题上,他补充道:“人们会生气,他们会把责任推到某个人身上。”
澳大利亚财政部长吉姆·查尔默斯(Jim Chalmers)将上升的利率归咎为经济衰退的原因,并认为购买房屋是一项长期投资,预计未来几年房价将有适度上涨。
然而,他承认政府“已经失去了一些政治支持度”(*lost some political paint*),并开始暗示在下个月即将公布的中期预算前可能会进行公共开支削减。
自措施实施以来,查尔默斯的净公众支持率在澳大利亚金融评论(Australian Financial Review)最近的一项民调中下降了九个百分点,降至负23点。
反对党自由党警告称,许多首次购房者在税改前签订贷款购买房屋,现在面临负资产的风险。影子财政部长蒂姆·威尔逊(Tim Wilson)将恶化的经济前景归咎于工党,并在上周的通胀数据公布后表示,“澳大利亚人几乎无法负担起维持家庭的开销”。
即使豪宅也不例外。罗塞(Rothesay),一座建于1868年的哥特式豪宅,上个月以澳元12.8亿(约合$9亿)的价格成交,仅仅四年前其前任业主曾以接近澳元20亿(当时该地区的最高纪录)购得。
房价暴跌还对建筑行业产生了影响。房地产开发商哈罗普(Harrop)警告称,数十万个计划中的开发项目不再具有可行性。
哈罗普近期接到了多个开发商的来电,希望以大幅折扣出售项目,但表示这种不景气可能还将持续至少两年。“说它混乱是轻描淡写了,”他说道。
富裕海外移民


Sources: Cotality; FT calculations • \* Data for Brisbane includes Gold Coast. Data as of Oct 29 2026
Australia has experienced several house price corrections since 1980

Measures aimed at cooling demand risk tipping economy into recession, say economists
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Australia's attempt to fix its housing crisis in May included a tacit understanding that the measures would lead to a lowering in prices in one of the world's most expensive property markets as investors left the market.
Nearly six months since the authorities unwound incentives that had fostered a housing boom and against a backdrop of higher inflation and rising interest rates, the impact has been more severe than expected.
The country is facing its worst housing correction in 40 years, which some economists fear might turn into an economic crisis. “Since 1982 there have been nine price corrections in the Australian market but this current one is potentially the mother of them all,” said Barrie Harrop, a property developer since the 1970s.
House prices have fallen 5.2 per cent since March, when the government of Anthony Albanese ended tax breaks and a capital gains discount that benefited people who owned multiple homes, according to Cotality, a property research company.
Analysts predicted that prices would drop by between 5 and 10 per cent as houses lost their appeal as the main source of investment for many well-off Australians.
But some economists now project a peak-to-trough decline of up to 15 per cent by the end of next year.
The Reserve Bank of Australia yesterday raised interest rates for a fifth time this year after inflation hit 4.3 per cent in the year to September, up from 4 per cent in the year to August, well above its target range.
Shane Oliver, chief economist and head of investment strategy at AMP, said the rate rise would probably push the property price decline towards the 15 per cent level heading into next year and could increase the number of distressed sellers.
"Prices are being hit by a perfect storm of rate hikes, tax hikes on investors, poor confidence and poor affordability depressing demand," he said.
That is evident in the weekly auctions held across the country. Data from
The median value of houses in Sydney plunged by more than A\$82,000 in the three months to September
Brendon Thorne/Bloomberg
Cotality suggests that more homes are being put up for auction as the weather has become warmer but also that the number of listings was 40 per cent below the levels of last year.
Meanwhile, agreed sales have fallen below 50 per cent in three of the past four weeks across Australian cities.
Domain, a property listings company, said the steepest quarterly decline in house prices since the early 1990s was recorded in the three months to September.
The median value of houses in Sydney plunged by more than A\$82,000 (\$57,800) in that period.
Atypically, the house price decline hit capital cities in all states, ranging from A\$20,000 over the quarter in Darwin to almost A\$90,000 in Perth.
Morgan Stanley said Australia's housing market would suffer its biggest correction since 1982 if prices dropped by 12.5 per cent. That would rank alongside housing busts during the depressions of the 1890s and 1930s.
The bank also cut its forecast for GDP growth next year to 1.1 per cent from 1.4 per cent and predicted that unemployment would rise to 5.1 per cent from 4.7 per cent.
Stephen Koukoulas, managing director of Market Economics and a former adviser to the Labor government of Julia Gillard, said that lower house prices were “desirable” to improve affordability but warned of risks.
“Falling house prices are a big deal. I am as nervous as a cat in a room full of rocking chairs,” he said. “The government does not want a recession but each week it is getting closer.”
On the deteriorating economic conditions, he added: "People will be pissed off and they will blame someone."
Jim Chalmers, Australia's treasurer, has blamed rising interest rates for the slump and argued that buying a house is a long-term investment with modest price rises expected in the coming years.
He has, however, admitted that the government has “lost some political paint” and has started to signal potential public spending cuts ahead of a mid-year budget due next month.
Since the measures were introduced, Chalmers' net public approval rating has fallen by nine percentage points to
'Falling house prices are a big deal. Each week a recession is getting closer'
Stephen Koukoulas, Market Economics
minus 23 points in a recent poll by the Australian Financial Review.
The opposition Liberal Party has warned that many first-time buyers who took out loans to buy houses ahead of the tax changes are at risk of negative equity. Shadow treasurer Tim Wilson blamed Labor for the worsening economic outlook and, after last week's inflation figures, said that “Australians can barely to afford to keep their homes”.
Even trophy houses are not immune. Rothesay, a Gothic mansion dating to 1868, was sold last month for A\$12.8mn (\$9mn) only four years after its previous owner paid nearly A\$20mn, a then-record for the area.
The price slump also has implications for the construction industry. Harrop, the property developer, warned that tens of thousands of planned developments were no longer viable.
Harrop has fielded calls from developers looking to sell projects at a steep discount in recent weeks but said that the malaise could persist for at least another two years. "To say it is chaotic is an understatement," he said.
Wealthy expats
艾米·卡兹明(Amy Kazmin)——罗马
杰米·约翰(Jamie John)和乔什·斯佩罗(Josh Spero)——伦敦
意大利总理乔尔吉亚·梅洛尼(Giorgia Meloni)提出的“离境税”计划,可能会将过去十年吸引富豪前往米兰等城市的外籍人士驱逐出去,专家警告称。
在其草案预算中,梅洛尼政府联盟提出对拥有资产€800,000或以上且决定离开意大利的人征收26%的“纸面利润税”。
私人财富律师警告称,如果该提案获得议会批准,将降低意大利对超级富豪的吸引力,并可能使现有居民产生离开的念头。
“这是一个非常重大的举措,将让许多在意大利定居或居住的客户感到非常不安。”米什康德雷亚律师事务所(Mishcon de Reya)私人财富和税务部门负责人查理·索斯纳(Charlie Sosna)表示。
梅洛尼政府称该“离境税”针对的是“超级富豪”,适用于在离开前10年内曾在意大利成为税务居民6年的人。如果在离开后数年内不变现财务资产,可以申请退税。
过去十年,意大利一直试图通过税收优惠来解决富豪离开的问题,鼓励富裕专业人士留下,富豪外籍人士定居。在其“平税制”下,移居意大利的外籍人士在15年内仅需对其境外资产和收入支付单一年度税款。
该计划于2017年启动时,费用固定为每年€100,000。
罗马还为新到的工作专业人士(包括归国意大利人)提供税收优惠,他们在5年内仅需对工资的一部分缴纳所得税。但过去两年,在米兰超级富豪引发争议后,梅洛尼联盟两次提高了平税费用,现已上调至每年€300,000。
“客户们(已经)对移居意大利感到焦虑,因为他们认为意大利不稳定。”索斯纳表示。但随着平税的变化“以及现在提到的离境税”,他们将“非常认真地考虑自己的选择”。
罗马将在明年从离境税中获得€3.7mn,接下来四年将超过€6.7mn,然后从2032年起每年下降至€3.4mn,因为离开的人可以开始申请退税。
罗马基地律师事务所奇奥门蒂(Chiomenti)的高级税务律师莫里齐奥·弗雷斯卡(Maurizio Fresca)表示,该提案的许多方面都存在模糊不清的地方,包括它如何与平税和其他激励计划相关联,以及是否仅适用于意大利境内持有的资产还是全球资产。
摩尔金斯顿史密斯(Moore Kingston Smith)税务部门负责人蒂姆·斯托沃尔德(Tim Stovold)表示,该提案可能会鼓励人们在达到可能触发离境税的6年居住门槛之前离开意大利。
“这将使意大利成为个人长期定居的一个不太受欢迎的目的地。”他表示。
意大利财政部未回应置评请求。
许多其他国家也对移居的富有个人征收离境税。在美国,净资产超过$2mn的人放弃绿卡或公民身份时,需要对全球资产的“纸面利润”缴纳资本利得税。
AMY KAZMIN — ROME
JAMIE JOHN AND JOSH SPERO — LONDON
Giorgia Meloni's plan to impose an "exit tax" on wealthy people who leave Italy risks driving away expatriates drawn to cities such as Milan over the past decade, experts have warned.
In its draft budget, the prime minister's coalition proposed a 26 per cent tax on paper profits accrued by people with assets of €800,000 or more who decide to leave Italy.
Private wealth lawyers warned that the move, if approved by parliament, would reduce Italy's attractiveness to the super-rich and discourage those already resident from remaining.
"It is a really significant move, and one that is going to have a lot of clients who have relocated there, or based there generally, very nervous," said Charlie Sosna, head of private wealth and tax at law firm Mishcon de Reya.
The exit tax, which Meloni's government said was aimed at the “super-rich”, would apply to people who were tax residents in Italy for six of the 10 years before their departure. It could be refunded if financial assets were not liquidated for some years after they left.
Over the past decade, Italy has tried to tackle the problem of departing wealth with tax incentives to encourage affluent professionals to stay and rich expatriates to settle there. Under its “flat tax” regime, expatriates moving to Italy pay a single annual levy on their total overseas assets and income for 15 years.
When the scheme began in 2017, the fee was fixed at €100,000 a year.
Rome has also offered tax breaks to newly arrived working professionals, including returning Italians, who pay income tax on just a portion of their salaries for five years. But in the past two years, amid an outcry over super-rich expats in Milan, Meloni's coalition has twice raised the flat tax, which is now levied at €300,000 a year.
“Clients were [already] anxious about a relocation to Italy as they saw it as unpredictable,” said Sosna. But with changes to the flat tax “and now the mention of an exit tax”, they are going to be “really considering their options”.
Rome will raise €3.7mn from the exit tax next year, rising to just over €6.7mn for the next four years, and then falling again to €3.4mn a year from 2032, as those who left can start to claim refunds.
Maurizio Fresca, a senior tax lawyer at Rome-based law firm Chiomenti, said many aspects of the proposal were ambiguous, including how it would relate to the flat tax and other incentive schemes – and whether it would apply only to assets held in Italy or worldwide.
Tim Stovold, head of tax at Moore Kingston Smith, said the proposal might encourage people to leave Italy before hitting the six-year residency threshold that would trigger a potential exit levy.
"It is going to make Italy a much less popular destination for individuals to make their long-term home," he said.
Italy's finance ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
Many other countries impose an exit tax on rich individuals who relocate. In the US, those with a net worth above \$2mn who give up their green cards or citizenship pay capital gains tax on the paper gains of assets across the world. See Lex
Peacekeepers
赫巴·萨利赫 —— 开罗
联合国维和部队正在结束为期35年的西撒哈拉任务,因为安理会未能续任其授权,分析师警告称这可能导致摩洛哥和阿尔及利亚之间爆发公开冲突。
该任务的授权于周日到期,安理会在周五陷入僵局,美国和俄罗斯分别提出了相互冲突的决议草案,均未获通过。
俄罗斯否决了美国提出的决议草案,该草案将使联合国任务无法组织长期搁浅的西撒哈拉自决公投,实际上将主权授予摩洛哥,后者已实际控制该领土大部分地区。俄罗斯提出的延长任务授权一年的决议草案未能获得足够票数。
摩洛哥声称对西撒哈拉拥有主权,而阿尔及利亚则支持并接纳了萨哈拉人民解放阵线(Polisario Front),该组织为该领土争取独立。
“我们现在处于前所未有的领域,”国际危机组织(International Crisis Group)北非主任里卡多·法比亚尼(Riccardo Fabiani)表示,他指出维和部队从缓冲区撤离意味着任何一方的误算都更容易引发更广泛的冲突。
摩洛哥和阿尔及利亚于2021年断绝关系,两国是死敌。两国都在扩充军备,阿尔及利亚是非洲最大的军事支出国之一,摩洛哥则从美国、以色列和法国购买装备。
联合国秘书长安东尼奥·古特雷斯的发言人周日表示,维和部队的撤离并未剥夺当地萨哈拉人民的自决权利,古特雷斯对“冲突升级的风险”表示担忧。
萨哈拉人民解放阵线领导人布拉希姆·加利的顾问乌比·布什拉亚·巴希尔(Oubi Bouchraya Bachir)表示,阵线将“在现场保持克制”,以便为政治解决方案创造空间。摩洛哥国王穆罕默德六世表示,他的国家将遵守停火协议。
足球
HEBA SALEH — CAIRO
UN peacekeepers are wrapping up a 35-year mission in Western Sahara after the Security Council failed to renew their mandate, in a development that analysts warned could lead to open conflict between Morocco and Algeria.
The mission's mandate expired on Sunday after the Security Council hit a deadlock on Friday when both the US and Russia presented competing resolutions, neither of which was adopted.
Russia vetoed a US proposal that would have ended any possibility of the UN mission organising a long-stalled referendum on Western Sahara's self-determination, in effect handing sovereignty to Morocco, which already controls much of the territory. Russia's resolution to extend the mission's mandate by a year failed to get enough votes.
While Morocco claims sovereignty over Western Sahara, Algeria hosts and backs the Polisario Front, a group fighting for independence for the territory.
“We are now in uncharted territory,” said Riccardo Fabiani, north Africa director at the International Crisis Group, who said the withdrawal of peacekeepers from a buffer zone meant a miscalculation by either side could more easily ignite a broader conflict.
Morocco and Algeria, which broke off ties in 2021, are arch-foes. Both have been building their militaries, with Algeria ranked Africa's biggest military spender and Morocco acquiring equipment from the US, Israel and France.
A spokesperson for UN secretary-general António Guterres said on Sunday that the peacekeepers' departure did not abrogate the local Sahrawi population's right to self-determination and Guterres was concerned about "the risk of escalation of hostilities".
Oubi Bouchraya Bachir, an adviser to Polisario leader Brahim Ghali, said the Front would “show self-restraint in the field” to allow for a political solution. Morocco’s King Mohammed VI said his country would abide by a ceasefire.
Football
阿赫梅德·阿尔·奥马兰 —— 吉达
原定于明年早些时候在沙特举行的亚洲杯足球赛事已被延期,随着中东地区伊朗与美国、以色列冲突再度升级,沙特正在应对新一轮紧张局势。
亚足联(AFC)周一确认,该赛事将推迟至2027年12月举行,这是自耶门胡塞武装袭击里亚德机场及其他民用和能源基础设施以来,连续取消或推迟的赛事之一。
原定于上个月在首都举行的沙特“沙漠达沃斯”投资峰会因袭击国王哈利德国际机场(至少造成12人死亡,300多人受伤)而被推迟至明年。
原定于2024年4月因伊朗与以色列冲突爆发后推迟至11月的沙特F1赛事,官方后来表示该赛事将不再举行。
亚足联和当地组织委员会表示,推迟亚洲杯赛事的决定是“基于地区当前的特殊情况,包括大量的后勤复杂性和旅行中断”。
组织者补充称:“由于地区发展带来的特殊情况,使得原定时间举办比赛变得不可能,因此推迟赛事是为了所有参赛队伍、官员、观众和其他利益相关者的利益。”
甚至在夏季胡塞武装袭击沙特之前,安全担忧和预算限制已经迫使沙特取消了多项赛事,包括红海国际电影节和电子音乐节MDLBeast。
AHMED AL OMRAN — JEDDAH
The Asian Cup football tournament that was due to be held in Saudi Arabia early next year has been postponed, as the Middle East braces itself for a renewed round of escalation in the Israel and US-Iran war.
The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) confirmed yesterday that the event would be delayed until December 2027, marking the latest event to be cancelled or rescheduled after a series of attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels targeting Riyadh airport and other civilian and energy infrastructure sites in Saudi Arabia.
The country's flagship “Davos in the desert” investment conference that was scheduled to take place in the capital last month was moved to next year after an attack on King Khalid International airport killed at least 12 people and wounded more than 300.
Formula 1 originally postponed its Saudi race from April to November after the start of the US-Israel strikes on Iran, but officials later said the kingdom's race would no longer take place.
The AFC and local organising committee said the decision to postpone the Asian Cup was “in light of the current exceptional circumstances arising from developments in the region, including substantial logistical complexities and travel disruptions”.
The organisers added: “Exceptional circumstances have been created for the organisation and delivery of the competition as originally scheduled, making the postponement necessary in the interest of all participating teams, officials, spectators and other stakeholders.”
Even before the Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia over the summer, a combination of security concerns and budgetary constraints had already forced the cancellation of several events in the kingdom, including the Red Sea International Film Festival and electronic music festival MDLBeast.
Security
彼得·坎贝尔、巴尼·乔普森、拉法埃尔·明德和劳拉·杜博瓦
七架客机在欧洲因接连在短时间内收到爆炸威胁而被迫降落并进行搜查。当局表示,这些事件被证实为虚假威胁,但分析师警告航空公司应做好未来数日可能面临更多威胁的准备,这些威胁可能是协调一致的企图,旨在干扰该地区的航空运输。
一架从曼彻斯特飞往西班牙穆尔西亚的瑞安航空航班在途中收到爆炸威胁,降落后立即被疏散并搜查爆炸物。波兰航空公司LOT的一架从伦敦希思罗机场飞往华沙莫德林机场的航班被迫改道并进行搜查。华沙机场一度关闭,但已重新开放。
昨天,一架从哥本哈根飞往华沙乔普尼克机场的SAS航班、一架从贝加莫飞往索非亚的维兹航空航班、一架从都柏林飞往索非亚的航班以及两架降落在罗马菲乌米奇诺机场的瑞安航空航班,均因分别收到威胁而进行搜查。其中一架瑞安航空航班在降落时被意大利战斗机护航。
这些事件尚未被官方确认有关联,发生在一架维兹航空航班从卢顿机场飞往布达佩斯后被迫降落的一天之后。两周前,一架奥地利航空从以色列飞往索非亚的航班也因虚假威胁被迫降落。
迄今为止,对这些飞机进行搜查的当局均未发现任何爆炸装置或爆炸物的证据。
欧洲委员会运输发言人安娜-凯西斯·伊科宁表示:“目前尚无法得出结论,这些报告的事件是否相关。各国调查仍在进行中。”
航空安全组织Osprey昨日告诉客户:“在近期内,航空业面临进一步爆炸威胁的可能性是现实的。”
---
PETER CAMPBELL, BARNEY JOPSON, RAPHAEL MINDER AND LAURA DUBOIS
Seven passenger aircraft across Europe were grounded and searched yesterday after a series of bomb threats received within hours of each other.
The authorities said the incidents were found to be hoaxes, but analysts warned airlines should brace for more threats in the coming days as part of what could be a co-ordinated attempt to disrupt aviation across the region.
A Ryanair flight from Manchester received a bomb threat while en route to Murcia in Spain and was quickly evacuated and swept for explosives on landing, while a flight by Polish airline LOT from Heathrow was diverted and forced to land at Warsaw's Modlin Airport for searches. The Warsaw airport was briefly closed but has since reopened.
Also yesterday, an SAS flight from Copenhagen to Warsaw's Chopin Airport, a Wizz Air flight from Bergamo to Sofia, another flight to Sofia from
Dublin and two Ryanair services landing at Rome Fiumicino were searched after separate threats were received. One of the Ryanair flights was escorted by Italian fighter jets while landing.
The incidents, which have not been officially linked, come the day after a Wizz Air flight from Luton was forced to land in Budapest after receiving a bomb threat. Two weeks ago, an Austrian Airlines flight from Israel was also forced to land at Sofia after receiving a threat that turned out to be false.
So far, none of the authorities that searched the planes reported finding any evidence of devices or explosives.
Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, a transport spokesperson for the European Commission, said: "It is too early to draw conclusions on whether the reported incidents are linked. National investigations remain ongoing."
Osprey, an aviation security group, told clients yesterday: "There is a realistic possibility of further bomb threats targeting aviation in the near term."
Big chill Officials assess dangers to Europe's food security after latest wave of cyber attacks on supermarket freezers ➕ PAGE 11
尼库·阿斯加里 —— 伦敦
吉尔·R·沙 —— 纽约
比特币交易所(Binance)表示,上周盗走$6.3亿美元的攻击者通过设置假面试来诱骗公司的一名软件工程师安装恶意代码,并公布了对这起盗窃案的调查结果。
比特币表示:“这不是一次单一孤立的入侵事件或简单的钓鱼攻击。攻击者结合了多种技术手段,包括......假招聘面试、恶意软件下载”以及其他方法,比特币昨日表示。
美国联邦调查局(FBI💡)将TraderTraitor(一群与朝鲜有关的黑客组织)归咎于史上最大规模的盗窃案。此次攻击发生在人工智能技术取得进展之际。
\- Engineer duped into malware attack
NIKOU ASGARI — LONDON
JILL R SHAH — NEW YORK
Binance said the attackers who stole \$6.3bn from the crypto exchange last week set up fake job interviews to trick a software engineer at the company into installing malicious code, as it laid out findings from a probe into the heist.
"It was not a single isolated breach or a simple phishing incident. The attackers combined a range of techniques, including . . . fake recruitment interviews, malicious software downloads" and other methods, Binance said yesterday.
The FBI has blamed TraderTraitor, a group of hackers linked to North Korea, for the biggest heist on record. The attack came as advances in artificial
情报机构驱动的加密货币黑客事件增加,揭示了区块链技术的脆弱性。
币安的调查结果还凸显了人为错误在允许黑客进入交易所系统中的显著作用。
该公司表示,今年6月,一名工程师下载了一个被篡改的软件程序。虽然币安的系统检测到了此事,并更换了该工程师的设备,但“工程师的角色及其相关同事在钱包基础设施团队中已被黑客暴露”。
9月,另一名币安工程师通过招聘平台被一名声称是某虚假公司项目总监的人联系。工程师参加了他们认为是面试的一系列活动,期间面试官分享了其社交媒体资料“以建立信任,币安称此事件‘比之前见过的社交工程手法更先进且更具欺骗性’。”
在第二次与声称是虚假公司CEO的人的面试中,面试官通过社交聊天应用指示工程师下载一份包含恶意代码的面试任务。该下载未被检测到,并允许攻击者利用币安的内部AI工具控制交易所部分系统。
币安表示,该恶意软件采用了复杂的混淆和规避技术,包括用恶意版本替换合法开发工具组件,以执行命令和与攻击者控制的外部服务器建立通信。
恶意软件部署后,攻击者利用被入侵的工程师笔记本和币安的AI工具控制了第一名和第三名工程师的笔记本。第一名工程师拥有发布代码的权限,黑客利用这一点。
10月29日,黑客登录第三名工程师的笔记本并“触发恶意脚本发起攻击。币安称已重建钱包系统和AI工具,并与外部网络安全专家合作加强安全系统。
币安联席首席执行官伊赫(Yi He)表示,今年该公司已检测并中和了57起疑似朝鲜黑客威胁。她说:“我们拦截了许多威胁,但阻止一起威胁失败的成本是严重的——这绝不应该发生。”洗钱流程第13页
---
欧盟委员会批准中国零售商京东集团(JD.com)收购德国电子零售商Ceconomy,该交易在欧盟国家补贴裁决后获清算。
欧盟委员会表示,京东集团的€2.2亿收购案已通过调查,布鲁塞尔认为中国电商集团曾获得国家补贴。
委员会称,京东集团已作出承诺,“完全有效地纠正了由识别出的外国补贴造成的扭曲”。这是首次在欧中贸易紧张局势下,中国对欧洲公司的收购案被欧盟外国补贴法规评估。中国曾威胁报复,如果该交易被阻止。此事发生在布鲁塞尔和北京近期达成限制中国混合动力车出口欧盟的协议后,以应对日益扩大的贸易赤字。
京东集团(JD.com)是中国最大的零售商,去年年收入达$187.2亿美元,于去年7月启动对Ceconomy的收购,后者在欧洲运营超过1,000家店铺,以MediaMarkt和Saturn品牌运营。
欧盟委员会昨日表示,京东集团(JD.com)利用来自北京的优惠融资、税收优惠和补贴,发展物流和技术知识,使其能够在竞争中压低对手价格。
京东集团承诺向其他零售商提供与Ceconomy相同条件的技术和物流服务,包括仓储。它还承诺在市场条件下进行集团内部交易,包括融资。这些承诺将持续10年。
欧盟反垄断负责人特蕾莎·里贝拉(Teresa Ribera)表示,这将防止“跨补贴各方在欧洲的运营”。她补充道:“消费者将从一个竞争性的零售和电商部门中受益,其中各公司拥有公平的竞争环境。”
这笔交易的完成时间比公司原定的目标日期晚了约5个月,并在一项“硬性截止日期”前一周完成,届时如果未能获得所有监管批准,任何一方都有权退出。Ceconomy的股价昨日上涨了2.7%。
京东集团首席执行官桑迪·徐(Sandy Xu)表示:“我们的目标是支持Ceconomy加速可持续增长,进一步巩固其在欧洲的竞争地位,并持续推动在不断演变的零售市场中的创新。”
Ceconomy首席执行官雷姆科·里恩德斯(Remko Rijnders)表示:“客户将从更广泛的选择中受益,包括更快的送货,以及获得能够加速市场创新的新技术的访问。”
intelligence have driven an increase in such hacks in crypto, revealing vulnerabilities in blockchain technology.
Binance's findings also underscore the significant role of human error in allowing the hackers to gain access to the exchange's systems.
The company said that in June one of its engineers had downloaded a tampered software program. This was detected by Binance's systems and the engineer's device was replaced, but not before the engineer's "role and his related colleagues on our wallet infrastructure team [had been] exposed to the hacker", it said.
In September, a second Binance engineer was contacted through a job-hunting platform by a person claiming to be a project director at what turned out to be a fake company. The engineer took part in what they thought was a job interview, during which the interviewer shared their social media profile “in order to build trust”, Binance said. It said the episode was “more advanced and deceptive than previously seen social engineering approaches”.
At a second interview with a person claiming to be the CEO of the fake company, which took place over a social chat app, the interviewer instructed the engineer to download an interview assignment, which contained malicious code. This download went undetected and allowed the attackers to use Binance's internal AI tools to gain control over some of the exchange's systems.
"The malware employed sophisticated obfuscation and evasion techniques, including replacing a legitimate development tool component with a malicious version to execute commands and establish communication with an attacker-controlled external server," Binance said.
With the malware in place, attackers used the engineer's compromised laptop and a Binance AI tool to control the laptops of the first and a third engineer. The first engineer had the ability to publish code, which the hackers used to their advantage.
On October 29, the day of the hack, the attackers logged on to the third engineer's laptop and "triggered a malicious script to launch the attack". Binance said it had since rebuilt its wallet systems and AI tools, and was working with external cyber security experts to strengthen its security systems.
Binance co-chief executive Yi He said that this year the company had detected and neutralised 57 suspected North Korean cyber threats. "We intercepted many of them, but the cost of failing to stop even one was severe – and this should never have happened," she said. Laundering process page 13
Deal cleared Chinese retailer JD.com to buy Ceconomy after state subsidy ruling by EU

A MediaMarkt store in Germany. The retail chain is one of two brands operated by Ceconomy — Imke Lass/Bloomberg
ANDY BOUNDS — BRUSSELS
FLORIAN MÜLLER — FRANKFURT
JD.com's €2.2bn acquisition of German electronics retailer Ceconomy has been cleared by the European Commission following an investigation in which Brussels determined the Chinese ecommerce group had benefited from state subsidies.
The Commission said yesterday that JD.com had made commitments “which fully and effectively remedy the distortion resulting from the identified foreign subsidies”.
The deal is the first time a Chinese takeover of a European company has been assessed using the EU's foreign subsidy regulation, at a time of trade tensions between the two sides. China had threatened retaliation if the deal was blocked. It comes weeks after Brussels and Beijing agreed to limit Chinese hybrid vehicle exports to the EU to tackle a widening trade deficit.
JD.com, China's largest retailer with annual revenue of \$187.2bn last year, launched its bid for Ceconomy, which operates more than 1,000 stores across Europe under the MediaMarkt and Saturn brands, in July last year.
The Commission said yesterday that JD.com had used preferential financing, tax incentives and grants from Beijing to develop logistics and technological knowhow that would allow Ceconomy to undercut its competitors.
JD.com has pledged to provide technology and logistics, including warehousing, to other retailers on the same terms as Ceconomy. It has also committed to conducting intragroup transactions, including financing, on market terms. The commitments last for 10 years.
EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said this would prevent “cross-subsidisation of the parties’ European operations”. She added: “Consumers benefit from a competitive retail and ecommerce sector, with a level playing field for companies."
The closure of the deal comes about five months behind the companies' target completion date and a week before a hard "long-stop date", after which either party had the right to walk away if all regulatory clearances had not been obtained. Ceconomy shares rose 2.7 per cent yesterday.
JD.com chief Sandy Xu said: "Our goal is to support Ceconomy in accelerating its growth sustainably, further strengthening its competitive position in Europe and continuously driving innovation in an evolving retail market."
Remko Rijnders, chief executive of Ceconomy, said: “Customers will benefit from a wider selection, including faster deliveries, as well as access to exciting new technologies that will help bring innovations to market more quickly.”
李·哈里斯 —— 伦敦
安东尼·加拉 —— 纽约
马克·沃尔特正在探讨出售其旗下资产总值为71亿美元的保险公司德拉瓦人寿保险公司(Delaware Life),这一举动发生在联邦调查其亿万富翁投资帝国之后。
据三名知情人士透露,沃尔特正在考虑出售该保险公司,这一交易可能是其持有公司TWG Global更广泛重组计划的一部分。但这些人表示,该计划仍处于初期阶段,可能不会最终成交。
沃尔特旗下公司TWG Global在一份声明中表示:“TWG并未启动德拉瓦人寿保险公司的出售流程,也未聘请外部顾问(法律或财务)推动出售事宜。”
“TWG亦未与任何潜在买家接触,关于可能出售的事宜。我们专注于TWG减少关联投资计划的承诺,并对该计划的进展感到满意。”
德拉瓦人寿保险公司未回应置评请求。
一旦出售,这将是高盛合伙公司(Guggenheim Partners)首席执行官沃尔特近期一系列资产处置中的最新一笔。自美国检方调查揭示德拉瓦人寿保险公司16亿美元的私人投资被误分类,以及其另一家由TWG控制的保险公司数十亿美元的问题后,沃尔特已加速筹集现金。
沃尔特近几个月内已完成出售其在洛杉矶湖人篮球队和伦敦切尔西足球俱乐部的股份。TWG Global表示,湖人队的出售并非“火拍式”处置,且否认任何不当行为。
根据公司数据,德拉瓦人寿保险公司截至6月的资产管理总额为71亿美元,并拥有超过38万份活跃的年金和人寿保险合同。
“他可能不得不在某个时间点出售它,因此他正在提前应对这件事。”一名知情人士表示,沃尔特正在考虑减持TWG对德拉瓦人寿保险公司的控股股份。
自德拉瓦人寿保险公司和Clear Spring Life and Annuity两家均由TWG控制的保险公司在6月份透露,已收到与纽约南区检察官办公室调查相关的传票后,沃尔特的业务面临日益增长的压力。
TWG在8月份表示,沃尔特的保险公司计划“立即消除所有关联方暴露风险”。
LEE HARRIS — LONDON
ANTOINE GARA — NEW YORK
Mark Walter has explored a sale of \$71bn-in-assets insurer Delaware Life following a federal probe into the billionaire financier's investment empire.
Walter has weighed selling the insurer in a deal that could form part of a broader restructuring of his holding company TWG Global, according to three people familiar with the matter. The planning was at an early stage and might not result in a deal, the people said.
“TWG is not running a sales process for Delaware Life, nor has TWG retained external advisers, legal or financial, to advance a sale,” the company said in a statement.
“TWG has also not approached bidders about a possible sale. We remain focused on TWG’s commitment to the affiliated investments reduction plan, and we are pleased that the plan continues to progress.”
Delaware Life did not respond to a request for comment.
A sale would be the latest in a series of disposals by the chief executive of investment firm Guggenheim Partners. Walter has rushed to raise cash since a probe by US prosecutors revealed \$16bn in misclassified private investments at Delaware Life and billions more at another insurer he controlled.
Walter has struck deals in recent months to sell his stakes in the Los Angeles Lakers basketball team and London's Chelsea Football Club. His TWG Global stated that the Lakers sale was not part of a “fire sale” and had denied wrongdoing.
Delaware Life had \$71bn in assets under management as of June, according to the company, and more than 380,000 active annuity and life insurance policies.
"He may be forced to sell it at some point, so he's trying to get ahead of it," one of the people said of plans to sell down TWG's controlling stake in Delaware Life.
Walter has faced growing pressure on his businesses since Delaware Life and Clear Spring Life and Annuity, both of which he controls through TWG, revealed in June that they had received subpoenas in connection with an investigation by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
TWG said in August that Walter's insurers planned to "promptly eliminate all of the affiliate exposure".
商业洞见
欧洲
约翰·盖珀
地理位置在物流中至关重要,从伦敦港口(London Gateway)16座高塔中的一座中间层俯瞰,可以看到泰晤士河一侧,一座巨型Tesco配送中心在远处拔地而起,而第五个货轮泊位正在建设中。不久,它将成为英国最大的集装箱港口。
大多数港口都是历史悠久的,但伦敦港口是新建的。它位于泰晤士河口北岸,距离首都东部25英里处,原本是一家壳牌石油炼厂的旧址,于2010年开始建设。预计到2028年,它将超过苏福克郡的费克斯托港(Felixstowe),吸引来自中国和亚洲的最大货轮,装载着钢制集装箱。
阿布扎比港口世界集团(Dubai Ports World)自20年前以£3.9亿收购港口和渡轮集团P&O后,已在该项目中投资了£3亿。阿拉伯酋长国集团的雄心壮志在驶离A13高速公路并经过埃塞克斯镇斯坦福德-勒霍普(Stanford-le-Hope)时便一目了然。坑洼不平的道路渐渐消失,1,500英亩的开发区出现在眼前。
上周我参观时,世界最大集装箱运输集团马士基(MSC)旗下的阿比扬号(Abidjan)正在卸货,之后将驶往鹿特丹。其集装箱由138英尺高的中国起重机吊起,然后通过电动拖车移送到自动化堆垛起重机。起重机再次将钢制集装箱吊起,放置在等候的卡车后部。
伦敦港口是对“如果你建造它,他们就会来”这一谚语的大胆赌注。在这一案例中,DP World(阿布扎比港口世界集团)必须说服从亚洲到欧洲的全球航线运营商将集装箱运输线路引入该港口,而不是费克斯托港或南安普敦港。虽然附近的蒂尔伯里港(Tilbury)处理了一些集装箱,但它水深不足以停靠世界上最大的货轮。
DP World还需要扭转60年来伦敦港口衰落的趋势。20世纪60年代,随着干散货运输转向集装箱运输,内伦敦的码头和仓库逐渐衰落。费克斯托港成为英国主要的进口港口,尽管它距离首都有90英里之远。
但决定在泰晤士河畔的一片棕地上建造一个现代化、深水港的决定正在发挥作用。伦敦港口去年逐渐缩小了与费克斯托港的差距,当一个由马士基和哈帕格-劳德(Hapag-Lloyd)组成的全球航运联盟将其亚洲到欧洲的航线转移到这里时。在明年第五个泊位和2030年第六个泊位开放后,该港口将雇佣1,600人。
“费克斯托港多年来一直是英国的主要港口,但它正在逐渐失去其王冠地位,”海运咨询公司德鲁里(Drewry)的埃里克·胡珀(Eirik Hooper)表示。费克斯托港由香港基金集团CK Hutchison所有,南安普敦港由英国最大的港口运营商联合英国港口集团(Associated British Ports)经营。澳大利亚投资集团IFM Investors上个月以£100亿的价格购得了ABP的多数股权。
伦敦港口的崛起得益于中国制造电动汽车进口量激增,这些车辆在英国市场占据更大份额。汽车通常通过滚装滚卸渡轮运输,但需求如此之高,现在它们被装入集装箱中。去年,英国港口处理的深海集装箱数量增长了12%,其中大部分增长集中在伦敦。
该港口的吸引力不仅在于地理位置,还在于物流优势。港口旁边有一个物流园区,供如Tesco和UPS等公司将货物直接运送到其设施。该园区模仿了迪拜的杰贝阿里自由贸易区(Jebel Ali free zone),成为竞争的障碍。如果船运公司的客户希望它们在这里靠岸,那么转投其他港口就变得困难重重。
英国的贸易逆差意味着大部分离开港口的集装箱都是空的。伦敦港必须在港口周边临时储存这些集装箱,直到它们能够再次运往亚洲。目前,港口正在建设一个自动化设施,用于堆叠高达27,000个单元,16层高,以减少拥堵。这一举措是港口预计到2030年投资总额将达到£4亿的计划的一部分。
这个港口依赖于港口大门之外的物流系统。大约三分之一离开的集装箱是通过火车运输的,但访问当天发生了一起货运列车脱轨事故,严重影响了这一运输方式。当地道路明显老化,“情况并非最差,但也不是最好”,DP世界英国港口集团首席执行官克里斯·亚当斯(Kris Adams)在评论英国的交通网络时委婉地表示。
不过,英国仍是一个吸引人的出口市场,伦敦港口地理位置优越。有迹象表明,更多船只(如阿比让号)会先停靠这里,再前往欧洲其他港口,而不是相反。一旦船只到来,就要继续建设。
john.gapper@ft.com
BUSINESS INSIGHT
EUROPE
John
Gapper

ocation matters in logistics, as the view from halfway up one of the 16 tall cranes at London Gateway shows. The Thames flows by on one side, a huge
Tesco distribution centre rises in the distance, and a fifth cargo ship berth is being built. This will soon become the UK's largest container port.
Most ports are historic but London Gateway is new. Perched on the north bank of the Thames Estuary 25 miles east of the capital where a Shell oil refinery used to be, it started construction in 2010. It expects to overtake Felixstowe in Suffolk by 2028 as it draws the biggest ships from China and Asia, loaded with steel boxes.
Dubai Ports World has invested £3bn since inheriting the project as part of its £3.9bn takeover of the ports and ferries group P&O 20 years ago. The scale of the Emirati group's ambition is obvious as one turns off the A13 and drives past the Essex town of Stanford-le-Hope. Pot-holed roads recede and 1,500 acres of development appear.
The Abidjan, owned by the world's largest container shipping group MSC, was being unloaded when I visited last week, before it sailed on to Rotterdam. Its containers were lifted by Chinese 138-metre-high cranes before being moved on electric shuttles to automated stacking cranes. The cranes hoisted the steel boxes again, placing them on the rear of waiting trucks.
London Gateway was a big bet on the adage if you build it, they will come. In this case, DP World had to persuade container carriers plying global routes from Asia to Europe to put in there, rather than Felixstowe or Southampton. Although the nearby port of Tilbury handles some containers, it is not deep enough for the world's largest ships.
DP World, which operates a container terminal at Southampton, also had to reverse the 60-year tide away from London. Inner London's docks and wharves declined in the 1960s amid the move from dry-bulk cargo to containers. Felixstowe became the main gateway port into the UK, despite being 90 miles from the capital.
But the decision to build a modern, deep-water port on
deep-water port on an expanse of brownfield Thames-side land is working. London Gateway pulled closer to Felix-stowe last year when Gemini, a
The port expects to overtake Felixstowe as it draws the biggest ships from China and Asia, loaded with steel boxes
global shipping alliance of Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, moved its Asia to Europe traffic there. After the fifth berth opens next year and a sixth by 2030, it will employ 1,600 people.
“Felixstowe has been the UK’s primary port for decades but it is slowly losing its crown,” says Eirik Hooper of the maritime consultancy Drewry. Felixstowe is owned by CK Hutchison, the Hong Kong-based conglomerate, and Southampton by Associated British Ports, the UK’s largest operator. The Australian group IFM Investors took a majority stake in ABP last month, valuing it at £10bn.
London Gateway has been helped by a surge in imports as Chinese-made electric vehicles take a larger share of the UK market. Cars usually travel on roll-on/roll-off ferries but demand is now so high that they are being packed in containers. The number of deep-sea containers handled by UK ports last year rose by 12 per cent, with most of the increase in London.
The port's allure is a matter of logistics as well as location. There is an adjacent logistics park for companies such as Tesco and UPS to bring goods straight into their facilities. Modelled on the Jebel Ali free zone in Dubai, it is a barrier to competition. If customers of shipping companies want them to dock there, it is hard to switch.
Britain's trade imbalance means most of the containers leaving the port are empty. London Gateway must find places to store them temporarily around the port before they can be shipped out to Asia again. It is now building an automated facility to stack 27,000 units 16 high to reduce congestion, part of an investment it expects to reach £4bn by 2030.
The port depends on logistics beyond its gates. About a third of the containers leaving are carried by train, but this was disrupted by a freight train derailment on the day I visited. Local roads are visibly ageing. “It’s not the best, although it is also not the worst,” Kris Adams, chief executive of DP World’s UK ports, observed diplomatically of Britain’s transport network.
But the UK is an attractive export market and London Gateway is in a good position. There are signs of more ships, such as the Abidjan, stopping there before heading on to European ports, rather than the other way round. Once they come, keep building.
john.gapper@ft.com
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (2026 REVISION)
NOTICE OF DISSOPTION APPLICATION
SAAO GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY LIMITED AND/OR ANY INFORMATION CONTACT THE "COMPANY"
GRAND COURT CAUSE NO. FSD0089 of (2014) (MRHCJ)
TAKE NOTICE THAT, by way of Summons, the Joint Official Liquidators of the Company shall not be entitled to the Grand Court of California for an order that the Company shall be dismissed pursuant to section 152 of the Companies Act (2026 Revision) ("the Dissolution Application"). The Company shall not be entitled to seek that the Dissolution Application is intended to seek that the Dissolution Application be dealt with by the Court administratively, i.e., on the papers without the need for a formal hearing, and should not be intended to seek that any remainder of the Company intends to object to the Dissolution Application being dealt with administratively and/or who intends to appear or otherwise be heard by the Court. The Company shall not be entitled to seek that the Dissolution Application of their intention to do so by 27 November 2026, along with the Details of the Directors' views relating to contacting the Joint Official Liquidators using the details provided below.
Dated 4 November 2026
August Madkins, Joseph J. J. Legal Liquidator
Contact for Enquiries:
Michal Segal
Email: michal.legal@j.dcg.com
(34) 545 526 8905
Address for Service:
Grant Thornton Specialist Services (Cayman) Limited
All the Chief Executive Yard, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY-14006,
Cayman I Bandis
私募资本集团第三季度贷款规模增长超过50%
安东尼·加拉 —— 纽约
阿波罗全球(Apollo Global)在第三季度贷款规模达到创纪录的114亿加元,将其保险客户的保费资金大量投入AI融资热潮,速度日益加快。
总部位于纽约的私募资本集团贷款规模较第二季度增长超过50%,其中包括为人工智能公司Anthropic安排的芯片融资交易,以及为芯片制造商英伟达(Nvidia)安排的500亿加元融资努力。
阿波罗集团在过去12个月内累计贷款规模超过350亿加元,几乎比去年同期增长了三分之一,其贷款规模与大型商业银行如汇丰银行(HSBC)和花旗银行(Citigroup)相媲美。
该私募资本集团通过投资其保险客户的保费资金(主要来自其旗下寿险公司Athene)来筹集贷款资金。阿波罗旨在通过发放资产支持贷款,获得高评级企业债券之上的0.3和0.4的利差收益。
虽然许多私募信贷机构已成为并购基金投资组合公司的贷款人,但阿波罗集团已成为大型科技公司的关键贷款人,后者正寻求筹集数十亿加元用于AI基础设施建设。
阿波罗集团为人工智能公司(如Anthropic、埃隆·马斯克的SpaceX和xAI)以及英伟达(Nvidia)提供融资,通过复杂的安排,将大额借款抵押在高价值芯片上。其融资活动还扩展至其他经济领域,第三季度为美国俄克拉荷马州的管道网络、德国制药公司等提供了大额贷款。
Calls to the Financial Times Advertising Department may be monitored.
Acceptance of any advertisement for publication will be subject to the then current terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications.
A copy of the terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications can be obtained from +44 (0)20 7873 3000, or viewed at www.FT.com/ advertising
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (2026 REVISION)
NOTICE OF DISOLUTION APPLICATION
SAAD INTERNATIONAL BANK LIMITED
(BN JOURNAL ASSOCIATIONS) (CHINA GRAND)
GRAND COURT CAUSE NO. FSD0090 of 2014 (MRHCJ)
TAKE NOTICE THAT, by way of Summons, the Joint Official Liquidators of the Company shall not be issued to the Grand Court of Bayern, Inc. for an order that the Company shall be dissolved pursuant to section 152 of the Companies Act (2026 Revision) (the "Dissolution Application"). AND FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, the Company shall not intend to seek that the Dissolution Application be dealt with by the Court administratively, i.e., on the papers without the need for a formal hearing, and should not be intended to seek that the Company shall not intend to object to the Dissolution Application being dealt with administratively and/or who intends to appear or otherwise be heard by the Court. The Company shall not be able to contact the Joint Official Liquidators of their intention to do so by 27 November 2026, along March 31th, in relation to the President's contact to contacting the Joint Official Liquidators using the details provided below.
Dated 4 November 2026
Margot Mackinson, Joseph J. Chief Financial Liquidator
Contact for Enquiries:
Michal Segal
Email michal.segal@ajcgj.com
(84) 526-8955
Address for Service:
Grant Thornton Specialist Services (Cayman) Limited
Berkshire, Department of Treasury, Ward, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY-9006,
Cayman Islands
制药巨头拜耳正在考虑阿波罗集团的贷款。
虽然阿波罗集团曾乐意以AI芯片作为抵押提供3500亿美元贷款,但一些竞争对手却不愿跟进这一新兴市场。Ares Management首席执行官迈克尔·阿鲁格蒂(Michael Arougheti)最近告诉股东,该公司避免以AI芯片作为抵押发放贷款,因为他“不知道如何评估这种技术的折旧曲线下降风险”。
一些大型商业银行也担心在贷款业务中过度暴露于单一科技巨头,因为近期的多万亿美元贷款热潮使它们不愿再增加贷款,以避免对任何单一客户过度依赖。
虽然阿波罗集团在第三季度创纪录地发放贷款,但其季度业绩却参差不齐,较高的利率和激烈的竞争导致部分业务未能达到华尔街的预期。
阿波罗集团将其规模达1万亿美元的投资组合计提了3.2亿美元的减值,以反映利率上升对其固定收益和私募股权投资价值的影响。其庞大保险业务的利差收益也因利率上升导致的资金成本增加而下降。
此外,由于激烈竞争侵蚀了潜在利润,该集团还在保险业务单元减少了新业务开发。该单元的季度净流入降至190亿美元,为今年最低水平。
阿波罗集团今年预计将吸引约800亿美元的新保险资金,与去年持平。
该集团在计入债券组合的账面减值后,整体录得10亿美元的净亏损,这是一种分析师通常忽略的临时账面波动。调整后净收入(分析师用作现金流更佳代理的指标)为1.3亿美元,略低于预期。
---
“死亡地带”
力拓集团采取行动阻止蟾蜍入侵
蟾蜍威胁到澳大利亚皮尔巴拉地区的生物多样性,该地区是力拓集团的运营区域,因为它们减少了当地物种的食物来源。
约书亚·普里埃托 / SOPA Images / LightRocket / Getty Images
力拓集团正加入与入侵性蟾蜍的战斗,这些蟾蜍正威胁侵蚀澳大利亚铁矿石丰富的皮尔巴拉地区,并对当地野生动物和经济造成破坏。
这家矿业集团将投入2800万澳元(约合2000万美元)与科学家合作,将澳大利亚西部印度洋与大沙漠之间的土地转化为“死亡地带”,以阻止澳大利亚最具破坏性入侵物种之一的蟾蜍扩散。
蟾蜍并不对力拓集团在皮尔巴拉地区的铁矿开采构成直接威胁。然而,它们对该地区独特生物多样性的影响,包括对蜥蜴、幽灵蝙蝠以及袋獾和小红袋鼠等多种物种的威胁,将使未来的规划申请变得更加复杂,并增加合规成本。
蒂姆·德姆斯特(Tim Dempster),维多利亚州吉隆大学的海洋生物学家,表示:“皮尔巴拉是力拓的核心区域,因此这是正确的做法,但这也是对其业务至关重要的事情。这是首次预测蟾蜍将对经济产生重大影响。我们需要规划蟾蜍如何改变景观,以及公司如何应对。”
六年前,力拓集团因在澳大利亚西部炸毁两个46,000年前的原住民圣洞而遭到国际谴责。时任首席执行官让-塞巴斯蒂安·雅克(Jean-Sébastien Jacques)后来向议员表示,“朱坎岩洞的破坏不应发生”,并向普图·昆蒂·库尔拉马和皮尼库拉人无保留道歉。
蟾蜍对澳大利亚原住民文化构成威胁,因为它们的扩散导致传统食物(如蜥蜴)的可获得性减少,这些蜥蜴在尝试吞食有毒的两栖动物后死亡。目前澳大利亚境内已有数亿只蟾蜍,预计将在约两年后抵达西澳大利亚北部的布鲁姆(Broome),并在2045年前到达皮尔巴拉(Pilbara)。
为了阻止入侵,布鲁姆和港口赫德兰(Port Hedland)之间正在建立一片“杀戮区”。蟾蜍在缺水情况下数日内会死亡,因此该40公里×400公里的隔离区内约200个水源(用于牧场主)将被改造为无法供蟾蜍使用的“水源”。德姆斯特(Dempster)将这些水源描述为“蟾蜍入侵的‘踏脚石’”。
本·菲利普斯(Ben Phillips),珀斯科廷大学(Curtin University)的种群生物学家,表示里奥集团(Rio)的合作涵盖了规划和管理建立无水边界的工作,他将其比作“防火带”。菲利普斯补充道:“里奥承担大型基础设施项目——普通生态学家很少参与。”
里奥钢铁(Rio Tinto)铁矿、铁路、港口和服务部门总经理克里斯·奥斯本(Chris Osborn)表示,25种本土物种将面临重大威胁,如果蟾蜍无法被阻止。他表示:“通过我们的环境战略,我们正致力于保护皮尔巴拉独特的生物多样性。”里奥集团正与学术界、农民和当地原住民社区合作,建立并维护这道无水屏障,该举措可能为其他地区阻止蟾蜍提供借鉴。
“其他针对入侵物种的方法通常是针对动物本身。而我们的做法是改变环境,使其对蟾蜍不适宜生存。如果我们做得好,就不需要触碰任何一只蟾蜍了。”德姆斯特(Dempster)说。
蟾蜍几乎一个世纪前被引入澳大利亚,目的是消灭对澳大利亚昆士兰州甘蔗种植者造成问题的甲虫。然而,这些来自南美的有毒蟾蜍并未成功消灭大量甲虫,反而吞食了其他一切。
尼克·菲尔德斯(Nic Fildes)在悉尼报道。
ceutical conglomerate Bayer and the New York Yankees baseball team.
While Apollo has been willing to lend billions against AI chips, some of its rivals have been reticent to follow it into the nascent market. Ares Management chief Michael Arougheti recently told his shareholders the firm had avoided lending money against AI chips because he did “not know how to underwrite the decline in depreciation curves on that type of technology.”
Some large commercial banks also fear becoming overexposed to individual technology giants in their loan books after a multitrillion-dollar borrowing binge, making them reluctant to lend more money over fears of growing overly reliant on any single customer.
While Apollo lent record sums in the third quarter, its quarterly results were mixed, with higher interest rates and heavy competition causing some of its activity to fall short of Wall Street forecasts.
Apollo wrote down its sprawling \$1tn investment portfolio by \$3.2bn to reflect the rise in interest rates, which hit the value of some of its fixed income and private equity investments. Spread profits at its vast insurance operations also declined because of higher funding costs from rising interest rates.
It also pulled back from writing new business at the unit due to intense competition that ate into potential profits. Quarterly inflows into the unit fell to \$19bn, the lowest figure this year.
Apollo is on track to attract about \$80bn in new insurance cash this year, roughly the same as last year.
The group recorded a net loss of \$1bn overall when accounting for markdowns to its debt portfolio, a temporary fluctuation in the accounting value of its portfolio that analysts often dismiss. Adjusted net income, used by analysts as a better proxy for its cash flows, was \$1.3bn, a bit worse than expected.

'Kill zone'
Rio Tinto acts
to halt cane
toad invasion
Cane toads threaten the biodiversity of the Pilbara region, where Rio operates, by diminishing the availability of food for indigenous species
Joshua Prieto/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
Rio Tinto is joining the battle against a marauding cane toad that is threatening to encroach on Australia's iron ore-rich Pilbara region and wreak havoc on the area's wildlife and economy.
The mining group will spend A\$28mn (\$20mn) working with scientists to turn a stretch of land between the Indian Ocean and the Great Sandy Desert in Western Australia into a “kill zone” to stop the march of one of Australia’s most destructive invasive species.
Cane toads do not pose a direct threat to Rio's iron ore mining operations in the Pilbara. However, the impact on the unique biodiversity of the region by endangering several species – including reptiles, ghost bats and mammals such as quolls and little red kalutas – would make future planning applications more difficult and increase compliance costs.
Tim Dempster, a marine biologist with Deakin University in Geelong, Victoria, said that the cost for mining companies to comply with environmental measures could rise significantly if action is not taken.
"The Pilbara is the heartland for Rio so it's the right thing to do, but it's an important thing to do for their business as well," he said. "It is the first time the toads are predicted to have a significant economic impact.
We have to plan for how the toads will shift the landscape and how companies can respond."
Six years ago Rio Tinto was scarred by international condemnation of its decision to blow up two 46,000-year-old caves sacred to Aboriginal people in Western Australia. Then chief executive Jean-Sébastien Jacques later told MPs that the “destruction of the Juukan rock shelters should not have occurred” and apologised unreservedly to the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura people.
The toads pose a cultural threat to the indigenous population of Australia as their spread has diminished the
availability of traditional food such as goannas that die after trying to eat the poisonous amphibians. There are now hundreds of millions of cane toads in the country, which are on track to reach Broome, on Western Australia's northern coast, in about two years and Pilbara by 2045.

In an effort to stop the invasion, a “kill zone” between Broome and Port Hedland is being created. Toads perish within days without access to water, so all 200 or so water sources used by cattle farmers in the 40km by 400km containment area will be made toad-proof. Dempster described the water sources as “stepping
MapLibre ©Mapcreator ©OpenStreetMap
Sources: FT research; sciencedirect.com; toadfree.zone stones for the toad invasion". Ben Phillips, a population biologist at Curtin University in Perth, said that the Rio partnership extended to the planning and management of creating the waterless border, which he compared with a "firebreak". "Rio do large infrastructure projects – the average ecologist doesn't," he said.
Chris Osborn, Rio Tinto's managing director of iron ore, rail, port and services, said 25 native species could be significantly threatened if the toads were not stopped. "Through our environment strategy we are working to protect the Pilbara's unique biodiversity," he said in a statement.
Rio is working with academics, farmers and the local indigenous community to establish and maintain the waterless barrier, which could provide lessons for turning back the toad in other areas.
“Most other approaches to invasive species have targeted the animal. This is about adapting the environment to make it uninhabitable for them. If we get it right then we won’t have to touch a toad,” Dempster said.
Cane toads were introduced almost a century ago to eat a beetle causing problems for sugarcane farmers in Queensland. The poisonous toads — native to South America — failed to eat many beetles but ate everything else. Nic Fildes in Sydney
Technology
MICHAEL ACTON — SAN FRANCISCO
Apple has warned that the “unprecedented” rise in memory chip prices and the cost of serving its AI tools would squeeze its margins even as it forecast better than expected sales for the crucial Christmas season.
Shares in Apple fell almost 2.5 per cent in lunchtime trading yesterday after the company warned of rising component costs and gave a weaker outlook for its high-margin services business.
Apple also predicted gross margins of 45 to 46 per cent in the fourth quarter of the year, less than analyst forecasts of 47 per cent.
The hit from the surging cost of memory chips overshadowed Apple's forecasts for iPhone sales for the holiday season.
Apple said that sales would rise between 7 and 10 per cent in the final quarter of this year, better than Wall Street forecasts of 6 per cent.
Chief executive John Ternus pointed to the shortage of memory chips as the boom in data centre building swallows up supply. "What we are seeing with memory pricing right now is unprecedented," he said.
Apple sales held up in the three months to the end of September, the final quarter of the company's financial
迈克尔·阿克顿 —— 旧金山
苹果警告称,记忆芯片价格“史无前例”的上涨以及为其AI工具提供服务的成本将挤压其利润,尽管公司预计在关键的圣诞季销售将超过预期。
苹果股价在昨天午间交易中下跌近2.5%,因为公司警告称组件成本上升并给出了高端服务业务前景较弱的预测。
苹果还预计今年第四季度的毛利率将为45%至46%,低于分析师预测的47%。
记忆芯片成本上涨的影响超过了苹果对圣诞季iPhone销售的预测。苹果表示,今年第四季度的销售预计将增长7%至10%,高于华尔街预测的6%。
苹果前硬件负责人(John Ternus)指出,随着数据中心建设的繁荣消耗了供应,目前记忆芯片的定价“史无前例”。他表示:“我们现在看到的记忆芯片定价是前所未有的。”
苹果在截至9月底的三个月内(公司财年最后一个季度)的销售表现良好,实现了超过预期的1145亿加元收入。
尽管公司创造了历史性的财政年度,但投资者更关注其圣诞季的财务前景,因为消费者正在消化最近的价格上涨以及折叠式iPhone Duo的艰难上市,后者因长时间的交付延误和屏幕裂纹问题受到不利影响。苹果坚称屏幕问题仅影响了有限数量的设备。
周一的财报也是John Ternus(苹果前硬件负责人)于9月接任CEO后的首次财报。他接任时,苹果的收入增长正在放缓,而记忆芯片成本最终开始影响消费电子公司。
S&P全球Visible Alpha研究部门负责人梅丽莎·奥托(Melissa Otto)表示:“我认为特恩斯的开局有些缓慢。”她补充道:“投资者可能会问:对于这种估值水平,我们能得到的最好结果是什么?不幸的是,这与新任CEO的首次财报会议巧合发生。”
奥托还指出,苹果对圣诞季销售的强劲预测似乎“完美定价”,考虑到恶化的经济条件和消费者面临的更高生活成本。
苹果在第三季度表现良好,iPhone收入增长17%,达到576亿加元。Mac销售额达到108亿加元,超出预期。
苹果服务业务(包括App Store、Apple Pay和iCloud)的收入为316亿加元,与估计一致。然而,公司预计当前季度服务增长将在8%至9%之间,远低于华尔街预期的12%。净收入为307亿加元。
第三季度的毛利率为47.9%,与其之前预测的47%至48%一致。
健康()
John Ternus, chief executive
year, with better than expected revenue of \$114.5bn.
Despite a record fiscal year for the company, investors were more focused on its financial outlook for the holiday season as consumers digest recent price increases and a rocky launch for the foldable iPhone Duo, which has been adversely affected by long delivery delays and reports of cracks in its screen. Apple insists the screen issues have affected only a limited number of devices.
Monday's earnings were also the first since Ternus, Apple's former hardware boss, took over as CEO in September. He has taken the reins when Apple's revenue growth is slowing from the robust pace set earlier in the year and as memory chip costs finally catch up with the consumer electronics group.
"I feel like it was a bit of a slow start for Ternus," said Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global's Visible Alpha. "The investment community is probably asking: Is this the best we can do for this level of valuation? Unfortunately, that happened to coincide with the new CEO's first earnings call."
Otto also noted that Apple's robust sales projections for the Christmas quarter appeared to be “priced to perfection” given worsening economic conditions and consumers facing a higher cost of living.
Apple reported solid performance in the third quarter, with iPhone revenue rising 17 per cent to \$57.6bn. Mac sales were better than expected at \$10.8bn.
Revenue for Apple's services business, which includes the App Store, Apple Pay and iCloud, was \$31.6bn, in line with estimates. However, it forecast services growth for the current quarter of between 8 and 9 per cent, well below the 12 per cent Wall Street expected. Net income was \$30.7bn.
Gross margin was 47.9 per cent in the third quarter, in line with its previous forecast of 47-48 per cent.
Healthcare
伊凡·莱文斯顿 —— 伦敦
卡莱尔集团(Carlyle)和PAI集团同意将妇女健康业务泰拉梅克斯(Theramex)以2.6亿欧元的价格出售给私募股权集团辛文(Cinven),这一交易价值几乎是四年前这两家并购集团以约1.4亿欧元收购该公司时的两倍。
卡莱尔和PAI于2022年收购了总部位于伦敦的泰拉梅克斯,该公司专注于更年期、骨质疏松等领域。昨日发布的声明显示,两家公司正联合将该业务出售给辛文。
据知情人士透露,此次交易将泰拉梅克斯的估值定为约2.6亿欧元,标志着在私募股权行业面临难以按常规时间线出售资产的情况下,泰拉梅克斯的投资者取得了强劲回报。
两家公司的投资者表示,他们在持有期间扩大了泰拉梅克斯现有业务,优化了供应链,并通过并购等方式增加了新产品。
PAI集团巴黎总部合伙人、健康事业部负责人塞巴斯蒂安·韦伊(Sébastien Veil)表示:“妇女健康这一领域在医药行业中被忽视,许多制药公司将妇女健康与避孕等同起来。”
他补充道:“在妇女健康领域,像更年期、骨质疏松、子宫内膜异位等子领域存在强烈的社会需求,同时也存在显著的未满足需求。”
泰拉梅克斯的治疗范围涵盖生育、避孕和子宫健康,在欧洲、亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲等80多个国家开展业务,其中包括为更年期症状提供激素替代治疗产品。
泰拉梅克斯欧洲健康事业部合伙人、领导人卢布娜·库纳什(Lubna Qunash)表示:“增长的一部分是我们加强现有品牌,并通过市场推动实际治疗和诊断率的提升。第二方面是成功推出创新新产品。”
此次交易是近年欧洲医疗健康领域私募股权集团的一系列交易之一。这些交易包括CapVest以10亿欧元从贝恩资本和辛文手中收购德国制药公司斯达达(Stada),以及GTCR以4.1亿欧元从阿德文图(Advent)手中收购Zentiva。
辛文表示,泰拉梅克斯在欧洲和国际市场进一步增长的基础上处于良好位置,并指出妇女健康是“特殊医药领域中结构性增长的细分市场,仍有大量人口未被诊断或未得到治疗”。
IVAN LEVINGSTON — LONDON
Carlyle and PAI have agreed to sell women's health business Theramex to private equity group Cinven in a deal worth €2.6bn, valuing it at almost double what the buyout groups paid for the company four years ago.
Carlyle and PAI acquired London-based Theramex, which specialises in areas such as menopause and osteoporosis, for about €1.4bn in 2022. They are jointly selling the business to Cinven, a statement released yesterday shows.
The deal valued Theramex at about €2.6bn, said people familiar with the matter, marking a strong return for its backers at a time when the private equity industry is struggling to offload assets within typical timelines.
Investors at the two companies said they had expanded Theramex's existing business, streamlined its supply chain and added new products, including via acquisitions, during their ownership.
“Women’s health is a bit of an overlooked segment in healthcare and a lot of pharma companies equate women’s health and contraception,” said Sébastien Veil, a partner at Paris-based PAI and head of its healthcare team.
“Within women’s health there are some segments like menopause, osteoporosis, endometriosis where there is a very strong social need . . . and at the same time a very significant unmet demand,” he added.
Theramex treatments span fertility, contraception and uterine health, with operations in more than 80 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. That includes providing hormone replacement therapy products for menopause symptoms.
"One part of the growth is us taking the franchise we had and doubling down and working within the market to grow the actual treatment and the diagnostic rate," said Lubna Qunash, a partner who leads European healthcare at Carlyle. "The second aspect was the successful launch of innovative new products."
The sale follows a string of European healthcare deals involving private equity groups in recent years. Those include CapVest's €10bn acquisition of German drugmaker Stada from Bain Capital and Cinven, and GTCR's €4.1bn takeover of Zentiva from Advent.
Cinven said Theramex was well positioned for further European and international growth, adding that women's health was a “structurally growing segment of speciality pharma, with significant populations still undiagnosed and undertreated”.
Pharmaceuticals
帕特里克·坦普尔-韦斯特 —— 纽约
辉瑞(Pfizer)因非新冠药物需求强劲,特别是癌症治疗药物和一款热销的抗凝血药物,提升了利润和收入预期,从而部分抵消了美国药企新冠疫苗产品销售下滑的影响。
在昨日公布的第三季度业绩中,总部位于纽约的辉瑞表示,预计全年销售额将达到620亿加元至640亿加元,较之前的预测指引605亿加元至625亿加元有所上调,主要得益于非新冠药物收入的增长。
该公司还将调整后每股收益的预测上调至2.95加元至3.05加元,较8月份的预测指引2.80加元至3.00加元有所提高。
此次上调使辉瑞成为近期最新一家提升业绩预期的制药企业。昨日,辉瑞的主要新冠疫苗合作伙伴BioNTech(拜因特)尽管疫苗销售下滑,仍将其收入预测的下限提高。上周,肥胖药企礼来(Eli Lilly)、默沙东(Merck)和布里斯托尔-迈耶斯·斯夸伯(Bristol Myers Squibb)也相继提升了各自的收入预测。
辉瑞面临压力,需要寻找新的增长来源以弥补新冠疫苗销售下滑的影响,该疫苗曾在疫情期间推动其业绩增长。辉瑞正通过并购(包括在肿瘤学和肥胖治疗领域)寻求扩张。
该公司报告称,在截至9月底的三个月内,年同比收入持平,其中非新冠药物销售增长了7,但新冠疫苗Comirnaty的销售下滑了29,抗病毒药物Paxlovid的销售则下滑了63,按固定汇率计算。
辉瑞的非新冠药物包括抗凝血药物Eliquis,该药物在本季度为公司带来了2.5亿加元的收入,得益于美国市场上该药物净价格的上涨。其肿瘤学药物(包括膀胱癌治疗药物Padcev)的收入达4.3亿加元。
辉瑞于2023年以43亿加元收购了Seagen,从而获得了肿瘤学药物的产品组合,其中包括Padcev。
辉瑞正在构建其管线,以应对即将到来的专利到期问题,包括今年至2030年间Eliquis和乳腺癌治疗药物Ibrance的专利到期。该公司的研发支出同比增长了18。
BMO资本市场分析师伊万·塞格曼(Evan Seigerman)表示,辉瑞的业绩得益于“超越新冠疫情的商业执行力”,并补充道:“投资者将关注管线能否帮助抵消即将到来的专利流失,尽管近期临床试验结果不尽如人意。”
公司与市场
PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST — NEW YORK
Pfizer raised its profit and revenue outlook on the back of strong demand for medicines including cancer treatments and a blockbuster blood thinner, helping to offset sinking sales of the US drugmaker's Covid-19 products.
In third-quarter earnings yesterday, New York-based Pfizer said that it was expecting annual sales of between \$62bn and \$64bn, up from previous guidance of \$60.5bn to \$62.5bn, on rising revenue from non-Covid medicines.
The group also upgraded its forecast for adjusted earnings per share to between \$2.95 and \$3.05, up from guidance in August of between \$2.80 and \$3.
The upgrade makes Pfizer the latest pharma group to have lifted its outlook in recent days. Yesterday BioNTech – Pfizer's partner on its main Covid vaccine – raised the lower end of its revenue guidance despite falling vaccine sales. Obesity drugmaker Eli Lilly, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb all lifted their own revenue forecasts in earnings last week.
Pfizer is under pressure to find new sources of growth to offset slumping sales of the Covid jab that powered its earnings during the pandemic and has turned to acquisitions, including in oncology and obesity.
The company posted flat year-on-year revenue in the three months to the end of September as a 7 per cent rise in sales of non-Covid medicines offset a 29 per cent drop in revenue from its Comirnaty Covid shot and a 63 per cent fall in sales of antiviral pill Paxlovid, at constant exchange rates.
Pfizer's non-Covid medicines include blood thinner Eliquis, which brought in \$2.5bn in the quarter, boosted by higher net prices for the drug in the US. Revenue from its oncology drugs, including bladder cancer treatment Padcev, brought in \$4.3bn.
It acquired Padcev as part of its \$43bn acquisition of Seagen in 2023, giving it a portfolio of oncology medicines.
Pfizer is building its pipeline as it faces looming patent expiries between this year and 2030, including for Eliquis and breast cancer treatment Ibrance. Spending on research and development rose 18 per cent year on year.
Evan Seigerman, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said that Pfizer's results were supported by “commercial execution beyond Covid” and added: “Investors will be looking for evidence that the pipeline can help offset upcoming patent losses following recent mixed [trial results].”
COMPANIES & MARKETS
欧盟官员权衡如何防止进一步事件发生,在未知黑客破坏价值数百万欧元超市冷藏库存后
---
TOM WILSON —— 伦敦
LAURA DUBOIS —— 布鲁塞尔
周一,欧洲数十家超市的冷库遭到黑客袭击,这是本月第二次此类“冷库黑客”事件,调查人员质疑谁会针对大陆冻品食品发动如此神秘的网络攻击之一。
截至目前,本周已有近100家由多家零售商运营的商店报告受影响,涉及瑞典、芬兰、爱尔兰、比利时、卢森堡和爱沙尼亚。
黑客远程将冷藏设备温度调至最高55摄氏度,导致食品报废。此前,10月一个夜晚内,法国700家超市也遭遇类似黑客袭击。欧盟官员将此描述为对大陆食品安全的有意袭击,并特别指出破坏了价值数百万欧元的食品,但尚无任何组织声称负责。
针对工业硬件的攻击(网络安全行业称为操作技术或OT)自2000年代初已有记录。然而,此类攻击通常需要专业知识,且针对特定国家的基础设施。最著名的OT攻击之一是2009年美国和以色列对伊朗核计划发动的“斯图克斯网”(Stuxnet)恶意软件。
冷藏设备此前也曾遭袭。去年,美国司法部指控一支亲俄黑客组织在2024年11月破坏加利福尼亚州一家肉类加工厂的冷藏系统。但OT网络安全专家表示,从未见过数百个相似目标同时遭到攻击。
罗伯特·李(Robert Lee),网络安全公司Dragos首席执行官兼OT攻击领域专家,表示大型语言模型使黑客更容易获取针对专业工业硬件所需的专业知识。他补充称,更多设备现在连接互联网以支持远程操作,也助长了攻击者。
“敌对方一直想攻击OT系统”,他说,“但我们行业的变化——如连通性、统一基础设施的转变,以及敌对方知识和能力的提升,扩大了攻击面并使此成为可能。”
此次攻击技术上并不复杂。黑客利用已知漏洞渗透控制每个单元温度的远程系统。
在法国袭击中受影响的供应商之一是丹麦公司丹佛斯(Danfoss),其后通知客户更新硬件和软件以修补控制系统中的安全漏洞。同时,超市也被建议更新其互联网安全设置。
斯蒂芬·莫兰斯(Stephan Moelans),比利时冷藏公司萨博贝尔(Sabcobel)首席执行官。
关于此次网络攻击,莫兰斯表示,黑客利用“后门”进入未使用安全互联网连接的零售商的控制器,并更改制冷设备的设置。他补充称,此次最新的黑客攻击中,约有20家使用其设备的商店受到影响,包括卡夫(Carrefour)、斯帕(Spar)和德尔哈伊兹(Delhaize)超市。
莫兰斯表示,那些采取了额外安全措施的商店,例如断开公共互联网连接或使用虚拟专用网络(VPN)保护连接,即使存在后门也未受到影响。
丹佛斯(Danfoss)公司确认其系统遭到入侵,并重申已告知客户将系统从公共IP地址断开连接、更新至最新固件,并使用“适当的网络保护”。
由黑石(Blackstone)支持的工业公司Copeland,其生产的Dixell品牌确认,昨日证实“某些”用于超市制冷控制的监控系统本周遭遇了报告中的网络安全漏洞影响。
在10月法国超市遭遇攻击后,网络安全专家表示,这些黑客可能是西方不满的青少年,也可能是具有战略目标的国家支持的攻击者。
虽然IT系统的黑客攻击通常会留下某种数字足迹,但对OT(操作技术)系统的攻击留下的痕迹更少,使归因变得更加困难。
安全集团Sentinel的网络威胁研究员汤姆·赫格尔(Tom Hegel)表示,他怀疑这些攻击实际上始于8月,当时多个美国军事基地的冷冻设备遭到一系列黑客攻击。赫格尔表示,基于相似性,这三起攻击“极有可能”与同一组织相关,而该组织最可能与俄罗斯有关。
赫格尔表示,俄罗斯的目标是对欧洲造成可否认的经济和心理损害。他继续说:“这是一种非常低成本的黑客攻击,但对目标造成了巨大的财务影响。这种攻击在技术复杂性和能力上,任何人都可以实施,但却具有持久的财务和心理影响。”
如果攻击是由其他组织实施的,赫格尔认为,他们应该会在公开或私人黑客论坛上声称责任。而俄罗斯则越来越多地采用“模糊性”作为其网络战争工具,他表示:“他们希望所有这些国家对谁可能实施此次攻击感到困惑,这会在国内和政治上造成混乱。”
欧洲委员会将讨论此事,欧盟食品和农业委员Hansen将与零售集团Ahold Delhaize会面,讨论这些攻击事件。
“我将继续密切关注发展并寻求全面的——”
Officials weigh how to prevent further incidents after unidentified hackers ruin supermarket stock worth millions of euros

TOM WILSON — LONDON
LAURA DUBOIS — BRUSSELS
Freezers at dozens of supermarkets across Europe were targeted on Monday in the second spate of so-called freezer hacks in a month, leaving investigators questioning who would target the continent's frozen food in one of the most mysterious cyber attacks in recent years.
All told, incidents have been reported this week in almost 100 stores operated by a variety of retailers across Sweden, Finland, Ireland, Belgium, Luxembourg and Estonia.
The attacks, which saw hackers remotely turn up the temperature in refrigeration units to as high as 55C, followed a similar series of hacks targeting 700 supermarkets in France during one night in October.
The incidents, which ruined food worth millions of euros, have been described by EU officials as a deliberate assault on the continent's food security. Yet no group has claimed responsibility.
Attacks on industrial hardware, known in the cyber security industry as operational technology or OT, have been documented since the early 2000s.
However, such attacks have typically required specialised knowledge and been targeted at specific infrastructure in particular countries. Perhaps the most famous OT attack involved the US and Israel launching a piece of malware known as Stuxnet against Iran's nuclear programme in 2009.
Refrigeration units have been hit before. Last year, the US justice department accused a pro-Russian hacking group of disabling refrigeration systems at a meat-processing plant in California in November 2024. However, OT cyber security specialists say they have never seen hundreds of similar targets attacked at the same time.
Robert Lee, chief executive of cyber security company Dragos and a leading expert on OT attacks, said large language models had made it easier for hackers to access the expertise needed to target niche industrial hardware. Attackers were aided, he added, by the fact that more equipment was now connected to the internet to allow for remote operations.
“Adversaries have always wanted to go after OT,” he said. “It’s the changes we’ve made in our industry like connectivity and moving to homogeneous infrastructure as well as the advancements in adversary knowledge and capabilities that have opened the attack surface and made this possible.”
The attack was not technically complex. Hackers used known vulnerabilities to penetrate the systems that remotely control each unit's temperature.
Among the suppliers affected during the French attacks was Danfoss, a Danish company, which then told its customers to update hardware and software to patch a security gap in its control systems. Meanwhile, supermarkets were advised to update their internet security settings.
“Since we were aware of this vulnerability, the supermarket chains and all the cooling companies started to remediate the vulnerabilities, but not all shops yet made the necessary steps to have a secure internet connection,” said
Spoiled food at a retailer in Sweden following the latest freezer hacks on almost 100 European stores. Below: Ireland's Supervalu was a target of the attacks as well as an ICA supermarket in Stockholm, bottom Johan Nilsson/EPA/Shutterstock


Stephan Moelans, the chief executive of Belgian refrigerator company Sabcobel.
This allowed hackers to use “a backdoor to enter into the controller and change the settings of the cooling installations” in those retailers that were not using a secure internet connection, Moelans said. About 20 shops using his equipment were affected in the most recent hacks, including Carrefour, Spar and Delhaize supermarkets, he added.
The shops that had put up additional security measures, such as disconnecting from the public internet or using virtual private networks that shield the connection, had not been vulnerable despite the backdoor, said Moelans.
Danfoss confirmed that its systems were compromised and reiterated that it had told customers to disconnect systems from public IP addresses, update to the latest firmware and use “appropriate network protection”.
Blackstone-backed industrials company Copeland, which makes the Dixell brand, confirmed yesterday that “certain” monitoring systems used to control refrigeration at supermarkets were “impacted by the reported cyber security vulnerability” this week.
Following the French supermarket attacks in October, cyber security experts said the hackers might be anyone from disaffected western teenagers to a state-backed adversary with a strategic goal.
Whereas hacks of IT systems often leave some form of digital footprint, attacks on OT systems leave fewer traces, making attribution harder.
Tom Hegel, a cyber threat researcher at security group Sentinel, said he suspected that the attacks actually started in August with a series of hacks of freezers at several US military bases. Given the similarities, Hegel said the three sets of attacks were “very likely” associated with the same group and that the group was most likely linked to Russia.
The objective for Russia would be to cause deniable economic and psychological damage in Europe, he said. "It's a very affordable hack that has massive financial impacts to the targets," he continued. "This is something that anyone can pull off in terms of technical sophistication and capabilities yet has lasting financial and psychological impact."
Had the attacks been committed by a different group, Hegel would have expected them to claim responsibility either publicly or on private hacker forums. Russia, meanwhile, has increasingly adopted “ambiguity” as a tool of its cyber warfare, he said: “They want all of these nations to be confused about who could have done this and that creates domestic chaos, political chaos.”
The European Commission is set to debate the issue and EU food and agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen is set to meet retail group Ahold Delhaize to discuss the attacks.
"I will continue to follow developments closely and seek a comprehen-
欧洲委员会食品与农业委员克里斯托夫·汉森(Christophe Hansen)表示,零售商应对此类事件的应对计划准备情况如下:
关怀与领导力
他指出,此类设备应运行在“一个虚拟网络中,其中系统仅能在有限空间内通信”,并指出在缺乏大型网络安全预算和技术专业知识的行业中,显然存在挑战。“总是有成本。您需要配置它,还需要维护它。”
比利时网络安全中心(Centre for Cybersecurity)负责人米格尔·德布鲁伊克(Miguel De Bruycker)建议,零售、制造和公共事业等行业的公司应避免将工业设备连接到公开互联网。
然而,他继续表示,过去六个月来,风险已大幅上升。“几乎所有人都容易受到攻击,并可能成为攻击的受害者。”
---
sive overview of the preparedness plans retailers have in place to respond to such incidents," Hansen said.
KINDNESS & LEADERSHIP
Such equipment should be run on “a virtual network where systems can only communicate in a limited space”, he said, noting there were obvious challenges in sectors that lacked big cyber security budgets and technical expertise. “There is always a cost. You have to configure it, you have to maintain it.”
Miguel De Bruycker, head of Belgium's Centre for Cybersecurity, advised that companies in sectors such as retail, manufacturing and utilities should avoid connecting industrial equipment to the open internet.
The risk, however, had risen dramatically in the past six months, he continued. "Almost everyone is vulnerable and can be a victim of an attack." See Markets and Markets Insight
金融
我们鼓励今天和明天的领导者,无论其角色或背景如何,以#关怀领导力(LeadWithKindness)为己任。
李·哈里斯(Lee Harris)
托德·博伊利(Todd Boehly)的保险公司已累积超过30亿加元的贷款,用于其正在开发的加利福尼亚州贝弗利山庄(Beverly Hills)房地产项目,这突显了该投资者利用保单持有人资金来融资其更广泛帝国的做法。
博伊利(Boehly)通过其控股公司Eldridge Industries拥有Security Benefit保险公司。其房地产附属机构Cain是One Beverly Hills项目的主要开发商,该项目位于加利福尼亚州,包含住宅、零售和酒店业务。
Eldridge周一披露,截至9月,Security Benefit已向Eldridge实体提供16亿加元的贷款,“由其在One Beverly Hills项目中的持股支持”,以及14亿加元的项目债务。
这些投资代表了这家670亿加元资产的保险公司在高度集中的赌注,同时也在保险公司向与其所有者相关的企业提供贷款时,面临日益严格的监管审查。
德克萨斯大学(University of Texas)的保险和证券法教授安德鲁·格拉纳托(Andrew Granato)表示,Security Benefit正在投资于“一个附属实体,该实体本身也需要大量债务才能开展运营”。
综合来看,这些贷款相当于Security Benefit 670亿加元已批准资产的约4.5%。
50 LEADING LIGHTS UK
堪萨斯州(Kansas)对该保险公司规定,如果某些投资超过其资产的3%,该公司应给予监管机构审查机会。
监管文件显示,Security Benefit已向五个信托贷款超过10亿加元,每个信托持有OBH PE Investor实体的20%股份,该实体与保险公司相关。保险公司表示:“Security Benefit对堪萨斯保险控股公司法(Kansas Insurance Holding Company Act)对进入附属交易的限制有充分了解,我们完全遵守这些限制以及所有其他适用的法律和法规。”
Financials
We encourage the leaders of today and tomorrow, no matter their role or background, to #LeadWithKindness
LEE HARRIS
Todd Boehly's insurer has built up more than \$3bn in lending linked to a Beverly Hills real estate project he is developing, highlighting the investor's use of policyholders' funds to finance his wider empire.
Boehly owns Security Benefit through his holding company Eldridge Industries, whose property affiliate Cain is a lead developer of One Beverly Hills, a residential, retail and hotel project in the Californian city.
Eldridge on Monday disclosed that as of September, Security Benefit had \$1.6bn in outstanding loans to Eldridge entities “supported by their holdings” in One Beverly Hills, along with \$1.4bn in project debt.
The investments represent an unusually concentrated bet by the \$67bn insurer and come amid growing regulatory scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest when insurers lend to businesses linked to their owners.
Andrew Granato, an insurance and securities law professor at the University of Texas, said it was striking that Security Benefit was investing in “an affiliated entity that also needs a vast amount of debt in order to conduct its own operations”.
Taken together, the loans are equivalent to roughly 4.5 per cent of Security
Benefit's \$67bn in admitted assets.
50 LEADING LIGHTS UK
Kansas, where the insurer is regulated, requires such a company to give regulators an opportunity to review certain investments if they exceed 3 per cent of its assets.
Regulatory filings show Security Benefit has lent more than \$1bn to five trusts that each own 20 per cent of OBH PE Investor, an entity affiliated with the insurer. The insurer said: "Security Benefit is well aware of the limitations that the Kansas Insurance Holding Company
Act places on entering into affiliated transactions, and we are in full compliance with those limitations and all other applicable laws and regulations."
一位高级保险律师告诉《金融时报》,3%是“监管机构的魔术数字——无论你将其分成五个不同的[特殊目的实体],都不会有区别”。
Security Benefit拒绝说明超过30亿美元的贷款是否构成了其对One Beverly Hills的全部暴露,或者是否已经获得监管机构对这些投资的批准。
这家保险公司去年拥有超过90万份在效力的保单和退休账户,多年来一直是最大的相关资产投资者之一——这些资产与保险公司所有者有关联的实体相关联。Mark Walter(一位Boehly的长期业务伙伴)所控制的保险公司今年因将超过200亿美元的相关私人投资误分类为非相关投资而面临联邦调查。
三位行业分析师和一位不愿透露姓名的律师表示,通过五个信托贷款给OBH PE Investor可能有助于Security Benefit避免触发监管审查。
其对One Beverly Hills的投资包括抵押贷款和所谓的“抵押品贷款”,后者由其他资产担保。
近几个月来,监管机构对抵押品贷款结构提出批评,一位州监管人员称这种结构是一种“资本套利”形式,正在“被积极利用”。
Security Benefit在美保险寿险公司中是抵押品贷款的最大使用者,占行业2025年末贷款总额近一半。
One senior insurance lawyer told the FT that 3 per cent was “a magic number for regulators – whether you divide those up in five different [special purpose vehicles] doesn’t make any difference”.
Security Benefit declined to say whether the more than \$3bn in loans represented the full extent of its exposure to One Beverly Hills, or whether it had obtained regulatory approval for the investments.
The insurer, which last year counted more than 900,000 active policies and retirement accounts in force, has for years been one of the largest investors in affiliated assets – holdings linked to entities with ties to an insurer's owner.
Such investments have faced increased scrutiny since a federal investigation this year into Mark Walter, a longtime business partner of Boehly, revealed that insurers Walter controlled had misclassified more than \$20bn in affiliated private investments by stating they were unaffiliated.
Three industry analysts and one lawyer, who all asked not to be named, suggested the lending to OBH PE Investor through five trusts may have helped Security Benefit avoid triggering a regulatory review.
Its investments in One Beverly Hills include mortgage loans and so-called collateral loans, which are backed by other assets.
Collateral loans have faced criticism from regulators in recent months, with one state regulator describing the structure as a form of “capital arbitrage” that was “being actively exploited”.
Security Benefit is by far the largest user of collateral loans among US life insurers, accounting for almost half the industry's loans at the end of 2025.
内维利娜·亚历山德罗娃(Nevelina Aleksandrova),公共科学图书馆(PLOS)首席工程师
萨姆里恩·阿什拉夫(Dr Samreen Ashraf),博恩茅斯大学商学院副院长
纳森·阿特金森(Nathan Atkinson),Rethink Food CIC联合创始人
苏罗什·阿齐兹(Surosh Azizi),盖拉德公司(Gailarde)财务总监
特莎·贝克(Tessa Baker),波特兰大学宇宙学与引力研究所教授
珍妮·巴伦(Jenny Barron),EY董事
鲁·贝戈姆(Roo Begom),Committed Support董事
克里斯托弗·博克斯(Christopher Box),普华永道(PwC)全球关系合伙人
夏琳·布莱斯威特(Charlene Braithwaite),伦敦当代音乐学院(LCCM)学生残障与福祉官员
爱德华·布鲁克斯(Edward Brooks),牛津特质项目执行董事
莎伦·巴特勒(Sharon Butler),Onnec全球人力资源总监
金伯利·卡宁(Kimberley Canning),Teleperformance(TP)英国及爱尔兰员工体验负责人
卡特里娜·昌齐(Katerina Chantzi),组织发展 / 学习与发展顾问兼促进者
詹妮·邓曼(Jenni Dunman),Daisy First Aid创始人兼首席执行官
克里斯蒂娜·迪米奥蒂(Christina Dymioti),塞浦路斯时尚遗产网络创始人
凯西·埃利奥特(Cathy Elliott),斯特雷特汉姆与克拉普汉高中(GDST)校长
巴米德勒·法林雷(Bamidele Farinre),Openclassrooms敏捷项目经理
雷贝卡·亨利(Rebecca Henley),牛津大学赛德商学院高级运动经理
泰勒·希克斯(Tyler Hinkson),TRIYBE合作与发展负责人
达伦·霍普古德(Darren Hopgood),哈威尔与亨德雷德青年足球教练
德克斯·亨特-托里克(Dex Hunter-Torricke),未来中心总统
雅克琳·约翰斯顿-费舍尔(Jacqueline Johnston-Fisher),Vitality Homes DJK House服务负责人
萨娜·卡达尔(Sana Kardar),英国国会生物医学科学家与政策创新者
尼科尔·诺特(Nicole Knott),普华永道(PwC UK)合伙人
苏西·马(Susie Ma),Tropic创始人兼首席执行官
安-玛丽·麦布里恩(Anne-Marie McBrien),牛津大学赛德商学院教职人员服务主管
乔·米德尔顿(Jo Middleton),国际犬类伦理研究所所长
科耶莎·穆克赫吉(Koyesha Mukherjee),The Leading You(n)th创始人兼首席执行官
尼莎·纳克维(Dr Nitha Naqvi),皇家布罗姆普顿医院与伊夫琳娜伦敦儿童医院(GSTT)儿科心脏病专科医生
艾米·尼古拉斯(Amy Nicholas),Morgan's Butchery Ltd董事
卡罗琳·佩珀(Carolyn Pepper),Reed Smith LLP合伙人
文斯·皮佐尼(Vince Pizzoni),诺丁汉大学副教授
弗拉维娅·波佩斯库(Flavia Popescu),The Manor of Oak创始人兼首席执行官
2026
@kindnessrules_
在@KindnessRules
kindnessrules.co.uk
罗克桑·波茨(Roxanne Potts),Inner Spark(戈亚尔基金会)首席合作官
詹姆斯·潘奇(Dr James Punch),积极行为支持负责人,IBC Healthcare
普米拉·莱娜(Promila Raina),埃塞克斯板球青年参与经理
海莉·罗菲(Hayley Roffey),全球儿童基金联合首席执行官
尼科拉·罗洛克(Nicola Rollock),金斯学院社会政策与种族学教授,NIANRO咨询公司董事
萨沙·萨姆吉奇(Sasha Samjic),First Steps Care董事兼治疗负责人
艾萨克·萨姆尔斯(Isaac Samuels),People's Voice Media合作与影响力负责人
吉莉安·桑德斯特罗姆(Gillian Sandstrom),苏塞克斯大学慈善心理学副教授
菲奥娜·塞弗斯(Fiona Severs),Keystone Law社区主管
拉姆沙·沙希德(Ramsha Shahid),Privity Legal合伙人
塞琳·辛格(Serene Singh),牛津大学圣彼得学院福利官员
朱莉·斯蒂芬斯(Julie Stephens),Bupa英国保险与功能部门人力总监
卡里恩·范德胡普(Carien van der Hoop),伦敦证券交易所集团(LSEG)OTC基础设施全球负责人
佩伊尔·沃克(Payal Walker),Women on Boards CIC联合创始人兼首席执行官
桑德拉·威金斯(Sandra Wiggins),Women on Boards CIC联合创始人兼首席执行官
法瑞哈·泽尚(Fareeha Zeshan),Million Smiles Global首席赋权官
Nevelina Aleksandrova, Lead Engineer, Public Library of Science (PLOS)
Dr Samreen Ashraf, Associate Head of Business School, Bournemouth University
Nathan Atkinson, Co-Founder, Rethink Food CIC
Surosh Azizi, Head of Finance, Gailarde
Tessa Baker, Professor of Cosmology, Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth
Jenny Barron, Director, EY
Roo Begom, Director, Committed Support
Christopher Box, Global Relationships Partner, PwC
Charlene Braithwaite, Student Disability & Wellbeing Officer, London College of Contemporary Music (LCCM)
Edward Brooks, Executive Director, The Oxford Character Project
Sharon Butler, Global Head of HR, Onnec
Kimberley Canning, Employee Experience Lead UK & IRE, Teleperformance (TP)
Katerina Chantzi, Facilitator & Organisational Development/ Learning & Development Consultant
Jenni Dunman, Founder & CEO, Daisy First Aid
Christina Dymioti, Founder, Fashion Heritage Network Cyprus
Cathy Elliott, Head of Streatham & Clapham High School, GDST
Bamidele Farinre, Agile Project Manager, Openclassrooms

Rebecca Henley, Senior Campaign Manager, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Tyler Hinkson, Partnership & Development Lead, TRIYBE
Darren Hopgood, Youth Football Coach, Harwell & Hendred Youth Football Club
Dex Hunter-Torricke, President, The Center for Tomorrow
Jacqueline Johnston-Fisher, Head of Services DJK House, Vitality Homes
Sana Kardar, Biomedical Scientist and Policy Innovator, House of Commons
Nicole Knott, Partner, PwC UK Pam Ledward, Director for Social Care Practice, Family Rights Group
Susie Ma, Founder and CEO, Tropic
Anne-Marie McBrien, Director of Faculty Services, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Jo Middleton, Director, International Institute for Canine Ethics
Koyesha Mukherjee, Founder and CEO, The Leading You(n)th
Dr Nitha Naqvi, Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist, Royal Brompton Hospital & Evelina London Children's Hospital part of GSTT (Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust)
Amy Nicholas, Director, Morgan's Butchery Ltd
Carolyn Pepper, Partner, Reed Smith LLP
Vince Pizzoni, Associate Professor, University of Nottingham
Flavia Popescu, Founder & CEO, The Manor of Oak
@kindnessrules\_
in @KindnessRules
kindnessrules.co.uk
Roxanne Potts, Chief Partnerships Officer, Inner Spark, Goyal Foundation
Dr James Punch, Positive Behaviour Support Lead, IBC Healthcare
Promila Raina, Youth Engagement Manager, Essex Cricket
Hayley Roffey, Co-CEO, Global Fund for Children
Nicola Rollock, Professor of Social Policy & Race, King's College London and Director of NIANRO Consulting
Sasha Samjic, Director and Therapeutic Lead, First Steps Care
Isaac Samuels, Head of Partnerships, Campaigns & Influence, People's Voice Media
Gillian Sandstrom, Associate Professor in the Psychology of Kindness, University of Sussex
Fiona Severs, Director of Community, Keystone Law
Ramsha Shahid, Partner, Privity Legal
Serene Singh, Welfare Officer, St Peter's College, University of Oxford
Julie Stephens, People Director, UK Insurance and Functions, Bupa
Carien van der Hoop, Global Lead, OTC Infrastructure, London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG)
Payal Walker, Founder & Co CEO, Women on Boards CIC
Sandra Wiggins, Founder & Co - CEO, Women on Boards CIC
Fareeha Zeshan, Chief Empowerment Officer, Million Smiles Global

UK COMPANIES
(No text to output)
Retail
高盛兄弟集团高管将被召见议员质询
吉姆·皮卡德
政治编辑助理
便宜连锁店(Poundland)的业主高盛兄弟集团(Gordon Brothers)将在数日内被召至议员面前解释其在该折扣零售商即将破产中的角色。议会商业特别委员会(Business Select Committee)昨日决定召见来自困境投资者高盛兄弟集团的高管进行质询。
劳动党议员、该委员会主席利亚姆·拜恩(Liam Byrne)表示,委员会将启动对便宜连锁店破产的调查,此举已在政治各界引发愤怒。委员会已向高盛兄弟集团发函,要求其高管在下议院接受公众审查。
拜恩告诉《金融时报》:“所有报告都显示便宜连锁店是一家可行且盈利的企业,而不是一家需要崩溃、拆解并逐块出售的企业。因此,我们要求高盛兄弟集团出席,澄清为何阻止了桌上的救援方案,从而拯救超过12,000个工作岗位。”
便宜连锁店上周向高等法院提交了任命破产管理人的意向通知书,为近年高街(高街商业区)中最大的倒闭案之一奠定了基础。
高盛兄弟集团昨日遭到议员指责,被指“掠夺性资本主义”和“如秃鹫般行为”,因为其拒绝了来自北爱尔兰房地产投资商马丁房地产集团(Martin Property Group)的救援方案。该方案要求偿还一笔£30的贷款,但高盛兄弟集团坚持要求竞购者偿还全部3000万英镑贷款,大大降低了救援方案的可能性。该贷款是便宜连锁店前业主在去年以低于£1的价格将其出售给高盛兄弟集团时遗留下来的。
斯托克-奥顿中区(Stoke-on-Trent Central)的工党议员加雷斯·斯内尔(Gareth Snell)表示,该投资者犯有“掠夺性资本主义”的罪行。
便宜连锁店成立36年,以销售从盘子到洗涤剂等各类商品的统一价格(£1)而闻名。该公司因面临激烈竞争和成本上涨,在截至2025年9月的财年报告亏损£85.2亿(£85.2mn),营收£1.5亿(15亿英镑)。
高盛兄弟集团告诉政府,自去年收购便宜连锁店以来,已提供了额外£85亿的融资支持(£85mn)。它将公司陷入困境归咎于通胀、更高的人力成本以及“严重的店铺盗窃”问题。
便宜连锁店的倒闭,其拥有约600家门店,将对首相安迪·伯恩汉姆(Andy Burnham)重振英国高街的承诺造成挫折。最可能的结果是,其他零售商将接手部分便宜连锁店的店铺资产,但数百家店铺将永久关闭。
高盛兄弟集团未对置评请求做出回应。伦敦的劳拉·奥尼塔(Laura Onita)提供了额外报道。
Gordon Brothers chiefs will be brought before MPs for questions over demise
JIM PICKARD
DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR
Poundland's owners will be hauled before MPs within days to explain their role in the discount retailer's looming insolvency after the business select committee agreed yesterday to call in executives from distressed investor Gordon Brothers.
Labour MP Liam Byrne, chair of the influential committee, said it would kick off an inquiry into Poundland's demise, which has prompted ire across the political spectrum. The committee has written to Gordon Brothers summoning its executives for public scrutiny in the House of Commons.
"All the reports are that Poundland is a viable, profitable business, not a business to crash, burn, break off and sell off piece by piece," Byrne told the FT. "So we are asking Gordon Brothers to appear to clear up the mystery of what's stopping taking the deal on the table to save over 12,000 jobs."
Poundland last week filed a notice of intent to appoint administrators at the High Court, setting the stage for one of the biggest high street failures of recent years.
Gordon Brothers was accused by MPs yesterday of “predatory capitalism” and behaving like a “vulture” after turning down a rescue deal from Martin Property Group, a Northern Ireland-based real estate investor and developer.
In addition to the select committee hearing, business secretary Jonathan Reynolds will meet Gordon Brothers' executives within days.
Kate Dearden, a junior business minister, said that Reynolds had arranged a meeting with Gordon Brothers “to press our concerns and establish the facts”.
Dearden said the government wanted an outcome “that protects as many jobs as possible”.
The collapse of Poundland, which trades from about 600 stores, would represent a setback to Prime Minister Andy Burnham's pledge to revitalise the country's high streets. The likeliest outcome is chunks of the retailer's store estate are taken on by other retailers but that hundreds of shops close for good.
Gordon Brothers' insistence that bidders repay a £30mn loan in full diminished the chances of a rescue deal, according to people familiar with the matter. It inherited the loan from Poundland's previous owner when it bought the retailer for less than £1 last year.
Gareth Snell, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, said the investor was guilty of “predatory capitalism”.
Poundland was set up 36 years ago and became renowned for selling a range of items from plates to detergent at a uniform price of £1. The company, which has struggled with fierce competition and rising costs, reported an £85.2mn loss for the year to September 2025 on revenue of £1.5bn.
Gordon Brothers told the government it supported Poundland with “£85mn of additional financing” since buying it. It blamed factors including inflation, higher staffing costs and “severe levels of shoplifting” for its plight.
Gordon Brothers did not respond to a request for comment. Additional reporting by Laura Onita in London
Energy
拉切尔·米拉德
Drax和布鲁克菲尔德宣布,将在英格兰北约克郡Drax的生物质发电厂建设大型数据中心,并获得卡塔尔投资支持。
该计划可能使Drax的生物质发电厂在下个十年为AI模型提供电力,但初期电力将来自现有电网连接。
英国能源集团Drax和加拿大基础设施投资者布鲁克菲尔德表示,双方将合作,力争在2028,,前建成100兆瓦的数据中心容量,2031年扩大至500兆瓦,并在2030年代达到1吉瓦。
第二阶段将使数据中心“表计后侧”(behind-the-meter),即直接从生物质发电厂取电。Drax表示,该项目第一阶段可能需要投资高达£2.5亿,总投资可能达到£20亿。
布鲁克菲尔德与Qai(卡塔尔投资权威旗下子公司)的合资企业将为该项目提供初期投资。布鲁克菲尔德的英国AI平台Radiant将与Drax共同开发该项目。
上市于伦敦的Drax正寻求替代当前政府补贴的收入来源,该补贴基于生物质被视为可再生电力来源。政府去年延长了该补贴至2031,,理由是Drax发电厂对英国“近期电力供应安全”至关重要。
数据中心开发商希望在英国设立基地,但面临无法获取足够电力供应和土地的挑战,而Drax均可提供。
政府希望吸引数据中心,并在上周的预算案中宣布了一项“协议”,旨在帮助大型项目顺利启动。
Drax与布鲁克菲尔德的合作处于初期阶段:公司需要获得政府批准,并找到数据中心承租方。
Drax首席执行官威尔·加迪纳(Will Gardiner)表示,该项目将“帮助确保该场地的长期未来,并保护数百个就业岗位”。
Drax股票昨日收涨6.6%。
---
RACHEL MILLARD
Drax and Brookfield have announced plans to develop vast data centre capacity at the energy group's wood-fired power station in North Yorkshire with Qatari backing.
The arrangement could see Drax's biomass plant powering AI models by next decade, although initially the electricity would come from the broader grid through an existing connection.
The UK energy group and the Canadian infrastructure investor Brookfield said they were joining forces to try to get up to 100 megawatts of data centre capacity up and running by 2028, increasing to 500MW by 2031 and up to 1 gigawatt in the 2030s.
The second phase would bring the data centre “behind-the-meter”, meaning it would take electricity directly from the biomass plant. The plans were likely to require investment of up to £2.5bn in its first phase and up to £20bn in total, Drax said.
A joint venture between Brookfield and Qai, a subsidiary of the Qatar Investment Authority, will provide initial investment for the project. Brookfield's UK AI platform Radiant will develop the project with Drax.
London-listed Drax has been looking for revenue to replace its current government subsidies, which are provided on the basis of biomass being a renewable source of electricity. The government extended the backing last year to 2031 on the basis that the Drax plant was needed to maintain the UK's "near-term security of supply" for electricity.
Data centre developers are looking to set up in the UK but have challenges accessing sufficient power supplies and land – both of which Drax can offer.
The government wants to attract data centres and announced in last week's Budget a “covenant” aimed at helping large projects get up and running.
The Drax and Brookfield partnership is at an early stage: the companies will need to secure government approvals as well as a data centre tenant for the site.
Drax's chief executive Will Gardiner said the project would "help secure the long-term future of the site and protect hundreds of jobs".
Drax shares closed up 6.6 per cent yes- terday.

维珍媒体O2(Virgin Media O2)今年已流失超过55,000名客户,去年流失了138,400名客户。该宽带提供商雇佣约16,000人。
维珍媒体O2将裁减数千人并削减开支,以缓解投资者对其£220亿债务负担的担忧。
英国第二大宽带提供商昨日表示,将在2029,,前削减£300万的员工成本(约占总成本的30%),作为更广泛£800万成本削减计划的一部分。
维珍媒体O2雇佣约16,000人,但拒绝透露将裁减多少人。
此举发生在该电信集团今年夏季因债券抛售而动荡之际,投资者担忧激烈的价格竞争来自小型光纤网络运营商,影响其偿还债务的能力。
维珍媒体O2最安全的债务周一以约71便士每英镑的价格交易,较年初的平价下跌。
部分集团风险较高的债务——约£1.7亿的复杂信用工具(vendor financing notes)——近期跌至约41便士每英镑。
首席执行官吕茨·舒勒(Lutz Schüler)表示,这些“艰难”决定是公司“未来成功和增长”的必要举措。
Virgin Media O2 has lost more than 55,000 customers this year, having shed 138,400 last year. The broadband provider employs about 16,000 people glosszoom/Alamy
Virgin Media O2 is to cut thousands of jobs and slash spending as the UK telecoms group moves to ease investor concerns over a £22bn debt pile.
The UK's second-largest broadband provider said yesterday that it would cut £300mn in staff costs by 2029, equivalent to about 30 per cent of the total, as part of a wider £800mn cost-cutting programme.
VMO2, which employs about 16,000 people, declined to comment on how many jobs would be cut.
The move comes after the telecoms group, which is jointly owned by Liberty Global and Telefónica, was rocked by a sell-off in its bonds in the summer over concerns that fierce price competition from small fibre network operators was hitting its ability to service its debt.
The price of VMO2's safest debt was trading at about 71 pence in the pound on Monday, down from about par at the beginning of the year.
Some of the group's riskier debt – about £1.7bn of complex credit instruments called vendor financing notes – reached the equivalent of 41 pence in recent weeks.
Lutz Schüler, chief executive, said the “tough” decisions were necessary for the company’s “future success and growth”.
“Given the market conditions we face, the regulatory backdrop in fibre and the technological changes sweeping across all areas of the
经济停滞不前,照旧做我们一直做的事,已经不是一个可行的选择,他说道。
《金融时报》在9月份报道称,VMO2的所有者计划削减数亿英镑的成本,以缓解投资者对公司财务的担忧。
昨日,VMO2在公布第三季度业绩时宣布了这些削减措施,报告显示该公司在7月至9月期间失去了23,000名宽带客户。
今年,该公司已经流失了超过55,000名客户,去年则流失了138,400名客户。
VMO2还确认了上周《金融时报》的报道,即该公司将取消对其电缆网络升级至更先进光纤技术的计划,以削减开支。詹姆斯·拉策表示,新的成本削减措施是“为了在竞争对手面前保持不败势头,应对宽带定价压力的迫切需要”。
除了削减成本,VMO2还表示将探索利用其他公司宽带网络的机会,以覆盖其自身1900万基础设施无法到达的地区。
《金融时报》上周报道称,VMO2正在与BT进行高级谈判,以使用其2500万家庭光纤网络。公司昨日未对这些谈判发表评论。伦敦记者基恩·史密斯(Kieran Smith)报道。
economy, standing still and doing what we've always done is not an option," he said.
The FT reported in September that VMO2's owners were targeting hundreds of millions of pounds in cost cuts in a bid to ease investor concerns over the company's finances.
The cuts were announced yesterday alongside VMO2's third-quarter results, which showed the company lost 23,000 broadband customers between July and September.
The company has now shed more than 55,000 customers this year, having lost 138,400 last year.
VMO2 also confirmed an FT report from last week that it would scrap a planned upgrade of its cable network to newer fibre technology to cut spending.
James Ratzer, an analyst at New Street Research, said the new cost-cutting measures were “simply a necessity to try to stand still against competitors given the pressures on broadband pricing”.
In addition to the cuts, VMO2 said it would be exploring opportunities to use other companies' broadband networks in areas its own 19mn infrastructure did not reach.
The FT reported last week VMO2 was in advanced talks with BT over a deal to use its 25mn home fibre network. The company did not comment on the talks yesterday. Kieran Smith in London
Retail
劳拉·奥尼塔和阿什利·阿姆斯特朗
阿斯达集团已任命前竞争对手莫里斯森斯(Wm Morrison)首席执行官大卫·波茨(David Potts)为新任首席执行官,以扭转英国第三大超市的颓势。
波茨昨日立即加入位于莱德斯的零售商,接替资深零售业老手阿兰·莱顿(Allan Leighton),后者将成为非执行董事会主席,在近两年领导该业务后离任。
莱顿表示,波茨的经验“正是我们现在所需的下一阶段转型所需的”,并补充称,在他的领导下,阿斯达已经“稳定”下来。
该集团于2020年由私募股权公司TDR Capital和亿万富翁伊萨兄弟以6.8亿英镑的价格收购,但一直面临销售下滑、亏损扩大以及市场份额流失的问题,特别是在与更大的竞争对手如特斯科(Tesco)和J·桑斯伯里(J Sainsbury)以及折扣连锁店阿尔迪(Aldi)和利德尔(Lidl)的竞争中。此外,由于其杠杆收购后的沉重债务负担,阿斯达的经营也受到影响。
波茨表示,他将依靠一生的经验来运营超市连锁店,并承认阿斯达“经历了一个艰难的时刻”。
LAURA ONITA AND ASHLEY ARMSTRONG
Asda has appointed David Potts, the former boss of rival Wm Morrison, as chief executive to turn round the fortunes of the UK's third-largest supermarket.
Potts joined the Leeds-based grocer with immediate effect yesterday, succeeding retail veteran Allan Leighton, who becomes non-executive chair after almost two years leading the business.
Leighton said Potts's experience was "exactly what we now require for the next stage of our transformation", adding that Asda had "stabilised" under his own leadership.
The group, which was bought by private equity firm TDR Capital and the billionaire Issa brothers in a £6.8bn deal agreed in 2020, has struggled with falling sales and widening losses while ceding market share to larger rivals Tesco and J Sainsbury as well as discounters Aldi and Lidl. It has also been weighed down by a heavy debt burden since its leveraged buyout.
Potts, who has spent the bulk of his career at Tesco, said he would draw on a “lifetime [of] experience” to run the supermarket chain, acknowledging that Asda had been through “a challenged moment”. “Our job is to listen to what
“顾客想要什么,我就告诉《金融时报》。”波茨告诉《金融时报》。
这一消息出现在英国激烈竞争的零售业中合并风潮加剧之际。《金融时报》上个月报道称,赛百味(Sainsbury's)和莫里斯森(Morrisons)今年曾进行合并谈判,但前者最终退出。行业高管表示,阿斯达(Asda)与莫里斯森(Morrisons)合并的可能性也不应被排除。
据接近招聘流程的人士透露,波茨在“运营执行卓越性”方面将与莱顿(Leighton)的“魅力”相得益彰。
自2024年11月重返阿斯达担任执行董事以来,莱顿一直致力于通过大幅降价、提升产品可得性、改善店铺标准和整体购物体验,恢复其价值信誉。
在其任期内,阿斯达已出现复苏迹象。据公司数据,不含燃油销售的同店销售额在2024年8月18日前的7周内增长了0.2%,这是两年多来首次增长。
但复苏仍然脆弱。在2024年10月4日前的12周内,销售额下降了0.5%,而市场份额从去年同期的11.8%下降至11.5%,根据由Numerator提供的Worldpanel数据。
阿斯达的问题还被前东家沃尔玛(Walmart)拆分IT系统时出现的错误所加剧,导致产品可得性受损并延误了其转型。
“戴维(Potts)在行业中的记录有目共睹,而他最近与阿斯达高管团队和其他同事合作,我了解他将迅速产生影响,”莱顿表示。
---
零售与消费
customers want," he told the FT.
customers want, he told the FT.
The news comes amid heightened speculation over consolidation in the fiercely competitive UK grocery industry. The FT reported last month that Sainsbury's and Morrisons held merger talks this year, before the former walked away. Industry executives have said that the possibility of a union between Asda and Morrisons should not be discounted.
Potts's "excellence in operational execution" would be a good fit with Leighton's "pizzazz", according to a person close to the recruitment process.
Since returning to Asda as executive chair in November 2024, Leighton has sought to restore its value credentials by investing heavily in price cuts while improving product availability, store standards and the overall shopping experience.
There have been tentative signs of recovery under his tenure. Like-for-like sales excluding fuel rose 0.2 per cent in the seven weeks to August 18 — the first growth in more than two years, according to the company.
But the recovery remains fragile. Sales fell 0.5 per cent in the 12 weeks to October 4, while market share slipped to 11.5 per cent from 11.8 per cent a year earlier, according to data from Worldpanel by Numerator.
Asda's problems have been compounded by a botched separation of its IT systems from former owner Walmart, which disrupted product availability and delayed its turnaround.
“David’s record in the industry speaks for itself, and having recently worked with [some of the] Asda executive team and other colleagues, I know he will quickly make an impact,” Leighton said.
Retail & consumer
劳拉·奥尼塔 —— 伦敦
联合利华(Unilever)公布了进一步削减€1bn(即100亿欧元)成本和调整运营模式的计划,旨在向投资者证明其食品业务分拆后,能够实现更快的增长。该消费品集团表示,其生产达芙(Dove)肥皂的业务将通过削减“分拆后遗留成本”以及通过“组织简化、流程重设计和技术优化”实现€1bn的生产力节约,计划于2029年底前完成**。
联合利华将于今日的投资者日活动中为投资者提供更多详细计划。
去年,2022年,这家标普500指数公司的董事会突然将前首席执行官海因·舒马赫(Hein Schumacher)替换为首席财务官费尔南多·费尔南德斯(Fernando Fernandez),因为对其转型步伐不满。
费尔南德斯上任后,同意了一项$66bn的交易,将联合利华的食品业务与调味品制造商麦克奥米克(McCormick)合并,将海尔曼(Hellmann's)酱油和法式芥末(French's mustard)整合为一个业务组合。
LAURA ONITA — LONDON
Unilever has unveiled plans to cut a further €1bn of costs and changes to its operating model as the maker of Dove soap seeks to convince investors the separation of its food business has set the stage for faster growth.
The consumer goods group said yesterday that it planned to make productivity savings of €1bn by the end of 2029 by cutting “stranded costs” arising from the spin-off and making savings through “organisational simplification, process redesign and technology initiatives”.
Unilever will provide investors with more details of its plans at an investor day today.
Last year, the FTSE 100 company's board abruptly replaced former chief executive Hein Schumacher with its chief financial officer, Fernando Fernandez, after losing patience with the pace of his turnaround.
Since taking the top job, Fernandez has agreed a \$66bn deal to combine Unilever's food division with spice maker McCormick, uniting Hellmann's mayonnaise and French's mustard into one portfolio.
Activist investor Nelson Peltz, a Unilever shareholder who joined the company's board in 2022, spent years
并推动集团拆分。
这项交易预计将于明年上半年完成,但该交易在今年3月宣布时,投资者反应冷淡。
费尔南德斯随后承诺打造一个“更精明、更聚焦”的集团,以美妆、个人护理和家居护理为核心。
联合利华昨日表示,公司将遵循“全球战略、本地执行”的原则,并将重点放在简化业务流程上。一个“精简”的中央职能部门将由更负责任的本地团队补充,后者对其绩效负责。
该集团将优先发展增长迅速的美妆和健康品牌及市场,如印度和美国。
这项新的成本削减目标是在联合利华于2024年设定的目标基础上实现的,即在2026年底前实现每年€8亿的节约。
公司表示,预计2027年的业绩将符合其中长期目标,即年净销售增长率为4%至6%,年净体积增长率至少为2%,以及经营利润率有所改善。
RBC资本市场的分析师表示,体积和销售增长的目标具有挑战性,但市场对此基本有所预期。“如果这是未来的发展方向,我们不期望在[资本市场日]有显著的股价反应”,他们补充道。
agitating for a break-up of the conglomerate.
The deal, which is expected to complete by the middle of next year, received a lukewarm reception from investors when it was announced in March.
Fernandez has since promised a “sharper, more focused” group centred on beauty, personal care and home care.
Unilever said yesterday that it would operate under the principle of “global strategy, local execution" with a focus on simplifying processes across its business. A "lean" central function will be supplemented by local teams more accountable for their performance.
The group will prioritise faster-growing beauty and wellness brands and markets such as India and the US.
The new cost-cutting target comes after Unilever hit its previous goal, set in 2024, of achieving €800mn of annual savings by the end of 2026.
The company said that it expected its results in 2027 to be in line with its medium-term target for annual underlying sales growth of between 4 and 6 per cent, underlying volume growth of at least 2 per cent and modest improvement in its underlying operating margin.
Analysts at RBC Capital Markets said the targets for volume and sales growth were challenging but largely expected by the market. “We don’t expect a significant share price reaction from the [capital markets day] if this is the shape of what is to come,” they added.
Oil & gas
尼克·菲尔德斯 —— 悉尼
壳牌将其在澳大利亚最大天然气田的股份出售给阿布扎比国家石油公司(阿迪诺克)的投资部门,交易金额为14.5亿加元,这是壳牌剥离成熟资产的一部分。
这家英荷石油巨头昨日表示,已同意将其在北西海岸项目(North West Shelf)的16.7%股份出售给阿迪诺克的能源投资部门XRG。
“此次出售实现了成熟、非运营资产的价值,并支持壳牌将投资重点放在优势型集成天然气项目上,随着北西海岸项目(NWS)未来向第三方收费加工模式过渡”,壳牌集成天然气运营部门负责人塞德里克·克雷默斯(Cederic Cremers)表示。
壳牌自1960年代以来一直是北西海岸项目的投资者,该项目由伍德赛德能源(Woodside Energy)运营,位于西澳大利亚沿海。该离岸天然气田帮助澳大利亚成为世界上最重要的能源出口国之一,其中大部分货物销往亚太地区的贸易伙伴。
壳牌今年将北西海岸项目股份上市,是在2023年剥离另一项伍德赛德离岸天然气项目——布朗斯(Browse)项目后的举措。
此次出售是壳牌剥离成熟资产战略的一部分,同时也反映了北西海岸项目从其卡拉塔(Karratha)液化天然气终端为第三方公司加工天然气的过渡。
XRG表示,其对澳大利亚能源市场的兴趣在去年试图以187亿加元收购澳大利亚第二大油气开发商圣士达(Santos)时已显露端倪,但未能成功。该公司于2024年由阿迪诺克成立,旨在收购全球天然气、化学品和低碳能源资产。
“此次投资推进了XRG在亚太地区建立领先国际天然气业务的战略,以满足不断增长的需求”,XRG国际天然气总裁穆罕默德·阿里亚尼(Mohamed Al Aryani)表示。
澳大利亚政府去年批准延长北西海岸项目至2070年,这一决定引发了环保组织的不满。
壳牌、英国石油(BP)、日本三菱和三井等公司也是该项目的股东。
上个月,壳牌支持的英国化学品集团英菲尼姆(Infineum)表示,正在探讨以80亿加元出售该公司,以便壳牌将重点放在核心油气业务上,并剥离业务外围部分。
公司与市场
加密货币。区块链
[⚠ 低质量翻译,建议复核]
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Shell will sell its stake in Australia's largest gasfield to the investment arm of Abu Dhabi's national oil company for \$1.45bn as part of a strategy to shed its mature assets.
The Anglo-Dutch oil major said yesterday that it had agreed to sell its 16.7 per cent share of the North West Shelf project to XRG, the energy investment arm of Adnoc.
"The sale realises value from a mature, non-operated asset and supports Shell's strategy by focusing investment on advantaged integrated gas positions, as NWS transitions in the future towards a third-party toll-processing model," said Cederic Cremers, head of Shell's integrated gas operations.
Shell has been an investor in the North West Shelf, which is operated by Woodside Energy and sits off the coast of Western Australia, since the 1960s. The offshore gasfield has helped Australia become one of the world's most significant energy exporters, with much of the shipments going to trading partners in the Asia-Pacific region.
Shell put its North West Shelf stake on the block this year after selling out of Browse, another Woodside offshore gas project under development, in 2023.
The sale is part of Shell's strategy to offload mature assets. It also reflects the North West Shelf's transition to processing gas for third-party companies from its liquefied natural gas terminal in Karratha.

The North West Shelf stake will be sold to Adnoc's investment arm
XRG signalled its interest in Australia's energy market when it made a failed \$18.7bn bid for Santos, the country's second-largest oil and gas developer, last year. The company was established by Adnoc in 2024 to acquire international assets in gas, chemicals and low-carbon energy.
"This investment advances XRG's strategy to build a leading international gas business serving growing demand across Asia-Pacific," said Mohamed Al Aryani, president of XRG International Gas.
The Australian government approved an extension of the North West Shelf project to 2070 last year, which angered environmental groups.
Chevron, BP and Japan's Mitsui and Mitsubishi are also shareholders in the project.
Last month Infineum, a UK-based chemicals group backed by Shell, said it was exploring an \$8bn sale as the energy major tried to refocus on its core oil and gas operations by offloading more peripheral parts of its business.
COMPANIES & MARKETS
Crypto. Blockchains
尼库·阿斯加里 —— 伦敦
分析师表示,尽管北朝鲜黑客团伙使用了复杂的自动化手段隐藏踪迹,但预计他们将需要数月时间来洗涤上周从加密货币交易所币安盗取的数十亿美元代币。
美国联邦调查局(FBI)将此次盗窃事件归咎于TraderTraitor黑客团伙,该团伙与秘密国家有关联,称预计盗取的资产将在被兑现前广泛洗涤。在部分代币被冻结后,初始盗取金额\$6.3亿美元中约\$3.3亿美元仍在该团伙控制之下。
尽管盗贼立即开始洗涤盗取的加密货币,并使用自动化工具执行数千笔交易,但加密货币追踪专家表示,这一过程将需要数周、数月甚至更长时间。
虽然盗取的代币在公开区块链上可见给执法机构,但黑客正在展开一项漫长而复杂的过程,将资金分批转移至多个平台,试图最大限度地阻止资金流向的追踪。
Chainalysis区块链追踪公司全球服务高级总监菲尔·拉拉特(Phil Larratt)表示:“这将是数周、数月,甚至可能是数年……他们将长时间持有这些资产,并寻找兑现的机会。”
Chainalysis联合创始人乔纳森·莱文(Jonathan Levin)表示,黑客手头的资金“太多,无法由受信任的洗钱渠道处理”,因此资金被分解成更小的份额,并发送至“更广泛的服务网络”。
洗钱努力的关键在于去中心化金融贷款市场和加密货币交换服务——这些服务允许用户在不出售任何代币的情况下,将一种加密货币转换为另一种。黑客使用复杂的自动化方法,将资金分割并发送至数千个新钱包,以加快资金流动并使追踪更加困难。
由加密货币大佬贾斯汀·孙(Justin Sun)创建的Tron区块链被视为洗钱者的重要工具。反洗钱网络(Anti-Money Laundering Network)称Tron为“洗钱方案的臭名昭著平台”,犯罪分子因其“高速交易和低费用”而青睐。
分析公司Elliptic表示,黑客通过Tron洗涤的代币在周末时已经移动了九次,凸显了这一操作的规模。在周六活动高峰时,每三秒钟就有一笔交易发生。
专家表示,使用的是常规软件自动化,而非代理式AI。Elliptic联合创始人汤姆·罗宾逊(Tom Robinson)称,“看起来像是由人运行的脚本”,并且“出现了类似人类工作模式的暂停”。
币安仍在调查黑客如何渗透其系统,但昨日透露,攻击者通过设置虚假面试诱骗一名软件工程师在其系统中安装恶意代码。币安还与FBI及区块链分析公司合作追踪资金。
---
盗取资金的流向(估计流向)
日期范围:10月29日至11月2日
*注:由于加密货币与美元汇率波动,各日期间数据可能无法精确累加*
--。
所謂的去中心化金融(DeFi)平台缺乏监管,通常涉及自动化合约执行诸如借贷等功能,而非传统中介机构如银行或经纪商。铁杆加密货币爱好者欣喜于DeFi协议缺乏监管,且许多协议不要求客户进行身份验证。
例如,盗窃发生后数分钟内,黑客将价值434万美元的USDT在去中心化交易所兑换为以太坊,并通过去中心化贷款平台AAVE以盗窃的USDT作为抵押,借入价值45万美元的以太坊,根据Elliptic的数据。
黑客随后使用另一家去中心化交易所SunSwap,将价值234万美元的USDT转换为TRX,即Tron区块链的原生代币。
约215万美元的TRX代币被分割并发送至约7,700个新创建的加密货币钱包地址,Elliptic称。在途中,部分TRX被兑换为USDD,这是Sun在2022年推出的稳定币,宣称其“冻结免疫”,即与Circle或Tether的稳定币不同,无人能冻结其资金。
黑客随后使用跨链桥(如THOR-Chain和Bitget Swap)将资金转换为以太坊。跨链桥通过在第一个区块链上锁定代币,并在目标区块链上发行等值新代币来实现资产跨链转移。至少147万美元的资金已从Tron区块链桥出,目前存储在数百个新的加密货币钱包中。
为了兑现资金,黑客最终将使用不进行客户身份验证的加密货币交易所或经纪商。
去年,FBI将TraderTraitor指控为从加密货币交易所Bybit盗窃15亿美元的罪魁祸首,这是当时史上最大的加密货币黑客案。
“资金可能会以类似Bybit案和之前朝鲜黑客案的方式兑现,通过不进行客户检查的交易商(通常是中文交易商)进行”,Elliptic的Robinson表示,补充称这些服务对客户“几乎不问或不问任何问题”。
被盗的Bybit资金最终被转换为USDT,然后兑现为传统货币。Robinson补充道:“大部分交易发生在链下,这使得最终步骤难以追踪。此外,USDT也可能被冻结,这是他们一个弱点。”
图片说明:加密货币资产显示在Binance应用中。该交易所正与FBI和区块链分析公司合作追踪被盗资金 —— SeongJoon Cho / Bloomberg
我们的全球团队为您提供24小时不间断的市场动态新闻与观点,[ft.com / markets](ft.com / markets)
朝鲜昨日否认参与Binance黑客案。朝鲜官方新闻社KCNA引用金正日(金正恩的姐姐Kim Yo Jong)的话称:“FBI试图将朝鲜民主主义人民共和国(DPRK)塑造成‘网络犯罪国家’,这是对朝鲜的严重政治挑衅,美国误导国际舆论,将世界各地的网络犯罪都归咎于我们。”
Binance承诺将偿还所有被黑客盗窃的代币。公司表示将从其自有资源中支付,包括约1亿美元的比特币储备(紧急基金)。此外,Song Jung-a在首尔补充报道。
查看市场洞察
商品

NIKOU ASGARI — LONDON
North Korean hackers are expected to take months to launder the billions of dollars of tokens they stole last week from crypto exchange Binance, say analysts, despite using sophisticated automation in an attempt to hide their tracks.
The FBI has blamed the heist on TraderTraitor, a hacker group linked to the secretive state, saying it expected the stolen assets to be widely laundered before being cashed out. Of the \$6.3bn initially stolen, about \$3.3bn remains under the group's control after some tokens were frozen.
Although the thieves began laundering the stolen crypto immediately and are using automated tools to carry out thousands of transactions, cryptotracing experts say the process will take months or longer.
The stolen tokens are visible to law enforcement on public blockchains, but the hackers are embarking on a long and complex process to shift them in small quantities through numerous venues as they try to make tracing the flow of funds as difficult as possible.
"This is going to be weeks, months and maybe even years . . . They will sit on them for a long period of time and try to identify opportunities to cash out," said Phil Larratt, senior director of global services at Chainalysis, a blockchain-tracing company that is working with Binance.
Jonathan Levin, co-founder of Chainalysis, said the hackers had “too much money for their trusted laundering venues to handle”, so the funds were being broken down into smaller chunks and sent “to a wider network of services”.
Key to the laundering effort are decentralised finance lending markets and crypto swapping services – used to swap one type of crypto for another without owners having to sell any tokens – which the hackers are using to convert the stolen tokens into other assets. They are using sophisticated automation methods to split up and send the funds to thousands of new wallets in an attempt to speed up the movement of money and make tracing harder.
The Tron blockchain, created by crypto mogul and Donald Trump donor Justin Sun, is regarded as an important tool for money launderers. The Anti-Money Laundering Network has called Tron “a notorious platform for sophisticated money laundering schemes”, favoured by criminals because of its “high-speed transactions and low fees”.
Analytics company Elliptic said each dollar's worth of tokens that the hackers laundered through Tron had already moved nine times by the weekend, underlining the scale of the operation. At the height of the activity on Saturday, one transaction was sent every three seconds, it said.
Experts said that conventional software automation was being used, rather than agentic AI. "It looks like scripts run by people," said Tom Robinson, cofounder of Elliptic, and that there had been "pauses that looked like human working patterns".
Binance is still investigating how the
The path of the money stolen from Binance Estimated flows between Oct 29 and Nov 2\* hackers managed to compromise its systems, but yesterday revealed that the attackers had set up fake job interviews to trick a software engineer into installing malicious code on its systems. It is also working with the FBI and blockchain analytics companies to trace the funds.

\* Figures may not sum between start and end dates due to fluctuation in crypto/USD exchange rates \*\* Swapped for ETH through DEXs and lending protocols; swapped for TRX through DEXS, then bridged
Source: Elliptic, data as at Nov 2, 7am
One way the hackers are seeking to hide the source of funds is by converting them into other tokens through decentralised finance platforms.
So-called DeFi platforms are unregulated and often involve automated contracts carrying out functions such as lending and borrowing, rather than traditional intermediaries such as banks and brokers. Diehard crypto enthusiasts relish the fact that DeFi protocols have little oversight and many do not require customers to submit to identity checks.
For example, minutes after the theft, the hackers had swapped \$434mn worth of USDT for ethereum on decentralised exchanges and borrowed \$45mn worth of ethereum against stolen USDT posted as collateral on the decentralised lending platform AAVE, according to Elliptic.
They used another decentralised exchange called SunSwap to convert \$234mn of USDT into TRX, the native token of the Tron blockchain.
About \$215mn worth of TRX tokens were split up and sent to about 7,700 newly created crypto wallet addresses, Elliptic said. On the way, some of the TRX was swapped for USDD, a stable-coin created by Sun in 2022 that bills itself as “freeze-free”, meaning that, unlike Circle and Tether’s stablecoins, no one can freeze it.
The hackers then used so-called cross-chain bridges including THOR-Chain and Bitget Swap to convert those funds into ethereum. Cross-chain bridges move assets from one blockchain to another by taking the token on
Crypto assets displayed on the Binance app. The exchange is working with the FBI and blockchain analytics companies to trace the stolen funds — SeongJoon Cho/Bloomberg

Our global team gives you market-moving news and views, 24 hours a day ft.com/markets
the first blockchain and paying it out in the form of new tokens on the destination blockchain. At least \$147mn had been bridged out of Tron, Elliptic said. It currently sits in hundreds of new crypto wallets.
To cash out, the hackers will eventually use crypto exchanges or brokers that carry out no customer checks.
Last year, the FBI blamed TraderTraitor for a \$1.5bn theft from crypto exchange Bybit in what was at the time the biggest ever crypto hack.
"The funds will probably be cashed out in similar ways to Bybit and earlier North Korean hacks, through [over-the-counter] brokers, often Chinese-language traders," said Robinson of Elliptic, adding that such services asked "little or no questions" of their customers.
The stolen Bybit funds were eventually converted into USDT and then cashed out, with the hackers paid in traditional currencies. "Much of that happens off-chain, which makes the final steps hard to see. It is also a point of weakness for them, because USDT can be frozen," Robinson added.
North Korea yesterday denied involvement in the Binance hack. “The FBI is trying to brand the DPRK as a ‘cyber criminal state’,” the country’s official KCNA news agency quoted Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as saying.
"It is a grave political provocation against the DPRK that the US misleads the international public opinion as if all the cyber crimes in different parts of the world are our deeds."
Binance has promised to reimburse all tokens stolen by the hackers. It has said it will pay this out of its own resources, including about \$1bn worth of bitcoin held in its emergency fund. Additional reporting by Song Jung-a in Seoul
See Markets Insight
Commodities
哈里·德姆普西 —— 东京
斯蒂芬妮·芬德莱 —— 休斯敦
马尔科姆·穆尔 —— 伦敦
日本企业自2023年以来展开全球规模的21亿加元投资潮,以加强对天然气供应的控制,应对中东和乌克兰冲突引发的市场动荡。这些投资主要集中在美国墨西哥湾沿岸的页岩资源上,支持日本的能源安全战略,并与唐纳德·特朗普推动美国能源主导地位的目标相辅相成。能源数据分析公司Enverus表示。
日本是全球第二大液化天然气(LNG)进口国,仅次于中国。除了寻求替代受中东供应中断和亚洲储量下降影响的能源来源外,日本企业还试图在美国AI数据中心的电力建设核心中扮演重要角色,并作为桥梁将美国LNG输送到发展中国家的亚洲市场。
日本已经超越英国、加拿大和澳大利亚,成为美国天然气资源外资投资的主要来源,占过去四年总额的五分之二。
“在伊朗战争后,日本能源采购发生了范式转变,尽管这意味着额外的成本,但重点在于多元化供应链的建设。”
—— 来自MST金融公司高级分析师索尔·卡沃尼克(Saul Kavonic)的评论。
除了在美国页岩资源上的大量投资外,日本LNG购买商在过去六个月中还加强了对澳大利亚、印度尼西亚和巴布亚新几内亚天然气田的控制。
“对于天然气市场来说,这是由地缘政治环境引发的重新安排;对于日本来说,则是掌控这些资源。”
—— 来自Womble Bond Dickinson公司石油和天然气实践负责人何塞·路易斯·维托尔(José Luis Vittor)的评论。
东京在2010年通过基础能源计划发出了关键政策信号,该计划指出天然气将在2040年后的电力系统中保持关键作用,并鼓励公共事业公司签订长期LNG合同,并投资于天然气资源和出口基础设施。
日本最大的发电商——也是全球最大的LNG购买商——Jera公司,去年斥资1.5亿加元收购了路易斯安那州的南曼斯菲尔德页岩气田。全球首席执行官加尼(Yukio Kani)表示,美国此前在“全球供应组合”中的代表性不足。
日本在美国页岩资源上的投资历史曾经充满挫折。2010年至2012年间的一轮不恰当的并购交易导致贸易商普遍出现资产减值,因为天然气价格下跌。
许多人相信,由于AI数据中心对天然气需求的超级周期,这次情况将会不同。
三菱商事(Mitsubishi Corporation)首席执行官中西克也(Katsuya Nakanishi)表示,该贸易公司今年斥资7.5亿加元收购美国页岩气生产商Aethon,将能够将天然气运往欧洲,但其主要目标是满足美国本土客户的需求。
“The objective with Aethon is to capture US demand through local production for local consumption,”
他表示。
“Aethon的目标是通过当地生产满足当地消费的美国需求。” —— 中西克也(Katsuya Nakanishi)如是说。
HARRY DEMPSEY — TOKYO
STEPHANIE FINDLAY — HOUSTON
MALCOLM MOORE — LONDON
Japanese companies have embarked on a \$21bn global deal spree to strengthen their grip on gas supplies following the market turmoil triggered by conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine.
The investments since 2023 have been concentrated on shale resources in the US Gulf Coast, supporting Japan's energy security drive and Donald Trump's goal for US energy dominance, according to energy data analytics firm Enverus.
Japan is the world's second-largest buyer of liquefied natural gas after China. As well as seeking to replace disrupted Middle Eastern supplies and declining reserves in Asia, Japanese companies also have ambitions to insert themselves at the heart of the US power build-out for AI data centres and to act as a bridge to bring American LNG to developing Asian markets.
Japan has now overtaken the UK, Canada and Australia as the primary source of foreign investment in US gas resources, accounting for two-fifths of the total over the previous four years.
"A paradigm shift has taken place for Japanese energy procurement in the wake of the Iran war with a return to bolstering diversity of supply chains, even if it comes at an additional cost,"
said Saul Kavonic, senior analyst at MST Financial.
Alongside substantial investment in US shale, Japanese LNG buyers have strengthened positions in gasfields in Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea in the past six months.
“For the gas markets this is a rearrangement caused by geopolitical circumstances,” said José Luis Vittor, oil and gas practice lead at Womble Bond Dickinson. “For the Japanese, it’s having control of the resources.”
Tokyo sent a key policy signal in its foundational energy plan, adopted last year. It stated that gas would maintain a crucial role in the power system beyond 2040 and encouraged utilities to secure long-term LNG contracts and invest in gas resources and export infrastructure.
Jera, Japan's largest power generator and the world's biggest LNG buyer, spent \$1.5bn last year to acquire the South Mansfield shale gasfield in Louisiana. Global chief executive Yukio Kani said the US was previously under-represented for a “global supply portfolio”.
Japan has had a troubled history of investing in US shale. A bout of ill-timed dealmaking in 2010-12 caused widespread impairments across the trading houses as gas prices fell.
Many are convinced that a supercycle in gas demand to power AI data centres means this time will be different.
Katsuya Nakanishi, chief executive of Mitsubishi Corporation, said the trading house's \$7.5bn deal this year for US shale gas producer Aethon would allow the group to ship gas to Europe but that its main goal was to supply American customers.
"The objective with Aethon is to capture US demand through local production for local consumption," he said.
Equities
吴子京、威廉·桑德兰
香港
中国监管机构已指示银行暂停公司上市和大规模股权出售,以振兴中国遭遇困境的股票市场。
中国证监会(CSRC)在过去几天内与投资银行举行了会议,并给出了非正式指导(或“窗口指引”),要求暂停初次公开募股(IPO)。根据三名知情人士透露,现有股东的大规模股权出售也已暂时中止,直到市场恢复。
中国证券指数300(CSI 300)作为内地中国的基准指数,10月份下跌了8.5%,创下十多年来最差月度表现。今年以来,该指数下跌了15%,而标普500指数则上涨了10%。
中国股票市场自夏季以来一直陷入长期下跌,受到宏观经济问题和对AI投资的日益怀疑所困扰。此外,对离岸信托的税收打击也促使一些亿万富翁出售股票以支付税款,进一步加重了市场压力。
此前的干预措施,包括7月份国有基金的购买行动以及最近限制股权出售的监管举措,均未能扭转下跌趋势。
中国政策制定者在股市下跌期间曾减缓IPO节奏,作为保持流动性的尝试。
这一举措可能会对中国股票市场的交易活动施加制动,而该市场在长期下跌后曾显现复苏迹象。今年IPO交易总额已超过300亿元人民币(约440亿美元加元)——2024年以来最高水平(根据彭博数据,超过2023年)。芯片制造商云天励飞(YMTC)是一家曾预计今年上市但尚未上市的公司。
新的措施是在上个月给出的早期指导之外,该指导包括稳定措施,如加速股票回购和要求投资者减少股票出售,根据知情人士透露。
资本经济学亚太市场主管托马斯·马修斯(Thomas Mathews)表示:“除非结合能直接解决结构性挑战的措施,否则这些举措不太可能带来持久的转机。这意味着需要提振盈利增长,而近期可能需要货币或财政支持。”
周一,中国证监会、中国人民银行和国家金融监督管理总局与证券经纪商和基金公司举行了会议,讨论稳定股票市场的方法。措施包括将用于股票回购的再贷款便利利率从1.25%降至1%,增加互换操作,并鼓励股票回购。
市场反应昨日低迷,CSI 300指数下跌0.2%,而以科技股为重点的创业板50指数下跌3.8%,而香港恒生指数则上涨0.6%。
朱比特资产管理公司的投资经理萨姆·科纳德(Sam Konrad)表示:“这是为什么我们对中国股票市场长期前景持基本不乐观态度的一个例子。它表明中国股票市场依赖于政府支持来提振市场。”
他补充道:“从长远来看,中国股票市场是全球表现最差的股票市场之一。我们认为中国的经济体系意味着增长并未转化为盈利增长。”
巴黎巴克莱亚太区股票和衍生品策略负责人刘杰森(Jason Lui)表示:“虽然这些政策可能不会在2024年9月那样立即扭转市场情绪,但它们为寻求积累中国A股暴露的中长期投资者提供了机遇。”
中国股票在2024年9月和10月反弹,监管机构推出了一系列刺激措施,包括两项中央银行流动性便利,旨在帮助经纪商和机构投资者购买股票。
The rally gained further momentum early last year as DeepSeek's breakthrough prompted global investors to revalue Chinese technology stocks. Confidence was then shaken by 美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的关税战,促使北京动员由国家支持的基金——“国家队”来帮助从去年4月起为中国股市设定底线。
今年第一季度,国家队的ETF和股票持仓进行了轮番抛售,再次引发对这轮牛市可持续性的质疑。
中国证券监督管理委员会(CSRC)未回复置评请求。
杰夫·韦恩斯坦
FJ Labs 合伙人
ZIJING WU AND WILLIAM SANDLUND
HONG KONG
Chinese regulators have told banks to hold fire on company listings and large share sales in an effort to bolster the country's struggling stock markets.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has held meetings with investment banks and given informal instructions – or “window guidance” – in the past few days about pausing initial public offerings, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions.
Large sales by existing shareholders have also been temporarily suspended until the markets have recovered.
The CSI 300, mainland China's benchmark index, fell 8.5 per cent in October for its worst month in more than a decade. It is down 15 per cent this year, while the S&P 500 has gained 10 per cent.
Chinese equities have been mired in a prolonged downturn since the summer, pressured by macroeconomic issues and mounting scepticism about AI investment. A tax crackdown on offshore trusts has also prompted some billionaires to sell stocks to pay their tax bills, further weighing on markets.
Earlier interventions, ranging from state-backed fund purchases in July to recent regulatory measures limiting share sales, have failed to reverse the decline.
Chinese policymakers have previously slowed the pace of IPOs during market downturns as part of attempts to preserve liquidity.
The move threatens to put the brakes on dealmaking in China's equity markets, which had shown signs of revival after a prolonged downturn. IPO deal volume this year has reached more than Rmb292bn (\$44bn) – the highest since 2023 – according to Bloomberg data. Chipmaker YMTC is one company that had been expected to list this year but is yet to do so.
The new measures are in addition to earlier guidance last month that included stabilisation methods such as accelerated share buybacks and asking investors to curb equity sales, according to the people.
The moves were “unlikely to generate a lasting turnaround unless paired with something that addresses the structural challenges more directly”, said Thomas Mathews, Asia-Pacific head of markets at Capital Economics. “That means boosting earnings growth, which in the near term probably means monetary or fiscal support."
On Monday the CSRC, People's Bank of China and National Financial Regulatory Administration said they had held meetings with securities brokerages and fund companies on ways to stabilise stock markets. Measures include cutting the rate on its relending facility for share buybacks to 1 per cent from 1.25 per cent, boosting swap operations and encouraging share buybacks.

Market reaction was muted yesterday, with the CSI 300 ending 0.2 per cent lower and the tech-focused Star 50 index down 3.8 per cent, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng gained 0.6 per cent.
Sam Konrad, investment manager at Jupiter Asset Management, said: “This is an example of why we don’t have a fundamentally positive view on the long-term outlook for Chinese equity markets. It’s a suggestion that Chinese equity markets are reliant on government support to try and boost them.”
He added: “Over the long term Chinese equity markets have been some of the worst-performing equity markets in the world. We think the economic system in China means growth is not translated into earnings growth.”
Jason Lui, head of Asia-Pacific equity and derivative strategy at BNP Paribas, said: "While these policies may not trigger an immediate reversal of sentiment similar to September 2024, they present medium-term opportunities for investors seeking to accumulate China A-share exposure."
Chinese stocks rebounded in September and October 2024 after regulators unleashed a wave of stimulus, including two central bank liquidity facilities designed to help brokers and institutional investors buy shares.
The rally gained further momentum early last year as DeepSeek's breakthrough prompted global investors to revalue Chinese technology stocks. Confidence was then shaken by US President Donald Trump's tariff war, prompting Beijing to mobilise state-backed funds, known as the “national team”, to help set a floor for China's stock markets from April last year.
Rounds of sales in the national team's ETF and stock holdings in the first quarter of this year renewed doubts about the rally's sustainability.
The CSRC did not respond to a request for comment.
Jeff Weinstein
Partner
FJ Labs
安尔·卡希亚普(Anil Kashyap)市场见解
比特币交易所币安(Binance)的网络盗窃案已经为投资者、监管者和政策制定者提供了多个教训。政策制定者,通过战争演习和压力测试,通常会规划多种金融稳定风险。然而,网络攻击与大多数其他风险不同,它不是问“何时”会发生大型金融机构被入侵,而是问“何时”会发生。
金融稳定专家中有一种聊天室游戏:为什么我们迄今还没有遭遇过大规模的网络安全泄露?币安事件暗示了一个可能性——也许传统银行和受监管的金融基础设施已经不再是最具诱惑力的攻击目标。
如果加密生态系统在防范攻击方面足够粗心大意,那么那些寻求从网络犯罪中获利的人就会将目标转向那里。
但这并不能带来太多安慰。
大型银行正面临着持续不断的攻击。大数定律加上日益先进的AI赋予攻击者更强大的能力,表明大规模成功攻击只是时间问题。
有时有人说,AI的崛起将使机构能够与网络攻击者平起平坐。但这种乐观主义过于乐观。
AI可以并应该用于识别漏洞,并将成为应对这些漏洞的努力的一部分。但最近Hugging Face AI模型和数据库遭到入侵的事件清楚地表明,我们不能仅依赖技术。
解决不足的努力将依赖于人类,而人类无法像AI那样快速工作和适应。因此,防御努力将落后于攻击者。
关于币安黑客事件的初步报告指出,可能涉及国家赞助的攻击者。
单个机构永远无法拥有足够的资源来对抗这些行为体,而且期望它们能够做到也是不合理的。虽然一些主要金融机构之间存在信息共享合作,但政府在制定保护公民利益的标准方面扮演着至关重要的角色。
对于银行体系,监管框架已经建立,以帮助应对AI攻击的风险。但在加密领域。
Anil Kashyap Markets Insight
he cyber heist at Binance already offers a number of lessons for investors, regulators and policymakers. Policymakers, routinely
Policymakers routinely plan, via war games and stress tests, for a variety of financial stability risks. One thing that sets cyber attacks apart from most other risks is that it is a question of when a major financial institution will be compromised, not if.
One parlour game among financial stability experts is to speculate about why we have not yet had a massive breach. The Binance debacle suggests one possibility — maybe banks and conventionally regulated financial infrastructure are no longer the most inviting targets.
If the crypto ecosystem has been sufficiently careless about guarding against attacks, then that is where those seeking to profit from cyber crime will shift.
But there should not be much comfort to be taken from that.
Major banks are under constant attack. The law of large numbers, coupled with the way increasingly advanced AI empowers attackers, suggests it is only a matter of time before a substantial attack succeeds.
It is sometimes said that the rise of AI will allow institutions to fight back against cyber attacks on an equal footing. That is too optimistic.
AI can and should be used to identify vulnerabilities and will be part of the efforts to address them. But as the recent hack of the AI model and data repository Hugging Face makes clear, we cannot trust to technology alone.
Efforts to address deficiencies will depend on humans, who can't work and adapt as quickly as AI. Hence defence efforts will lag behind the attackers.
The early reports on the Binance hack point to the potential involvement of state-sponsored attackers.
Individual institutions will never have sufficient resources to battle such actors, and it's unreasonable to expect that they can. While there is some cooperation among major financial institutions to share information, governments have a vital role to play in creating standards that protect their citizens' best interests.
For the banking system, there is an oversight regime in place to help address the risks of an AI attack. The same is not true in the crypto
金融生态系统中,缺乏严格监管可能促进创新,但也使得加密公司面临脆弱性。目前,类似于对Binance的攻击可能不会动摇广泛金融体系的信心。但如果加密生态系统继续增长并与传统金融体系深度融合,其影响可能会极其严重。关于网络安全风险的一个真理是:一个组织(或金融体系)的安全性只能与其最薄弱的环节相匹配。
另一个需要担忧的原因是,犯罪分子和其他敌对行为者可能利用加密生态系统训练AI代理,以找出如何最有效地入侵金融机构。AI正在飞速发展。不同机构采用不同的防御措施。但攻破一个系统的经验可以为攻击另一个系统提供洞见。

如果一家主要金融机构或金融基础设施的核心部分被破坏,这将迅速在金融体系中播下广泛的不信任。信任是金融体系运转并支持企业和家庭的润滑剂。
如果信任在由敌对国家或非国家行为者发起的网络攻击中遭到严重破坏,很难恢复。系统性后果可能极其深远。
银行在防范这些风险上投入巨资,美国财政部和银行监管机构也在与受监管的金融机构合作,促进准备工作。但私营部门的规模和性质都将无法满足保护金融体系韧性所需的要求。
政策制定者应当意识到对Binance的攻击是一个警告,可能预示着更严重的事态发展。
防范盗窃数十亿美元并动摇金融信心的黑客攻击,需要公共部门与私营部门密切合作,增强韧性,并制定应对方案。
允许加密世界——金融体系中一个日益壮大的部分——仅受到最低限度的监管,损害了国家福祉。创新固然重要,但需要与适当的监管相结合。
安尔·卡什亚普(芝加哥大学布斯商学院经济与金融学教授)撰文。Kathryn Judge(哥伦比亚法学院教授)对本文有贡献。
探索塞浦路斯作为基金管理中心在分裂化格局中的作用

ecosystem. The lack of rigorous oversight might promote innovation, but it also makes crypto companies vulnerable. Right now, a Binance-type attack may not undermine faith in the broader financial system. But if the crypto ecosystem continues to grow and become more integrated with the traditional financial system, the impact could be far more devastating. One truism about cyber risks is that an organisation (or a financial system) is only as strong as its weakest link.
Another reason to worry is that criminals and other hostile actors could use the crypto ecosystem to train AI agents on how best to hack financial institutions. AI is improving by leaps and bounds. Different institutions use different defences. But learning how to hack one system can provide insights into how to attack another.

If the functioning of a major financial institution, or a key part of the established financial infrastructure, is compromised, that could quickly sow widespread distrust of the financial system. Trust is the grease that allows the financial system to function and to support businesses and households.
If it is badly damaged in a cyber attack instigated by a hostile nation or non-state actor, it will not be easily regained. The systemic ramifications could be far-reaching.
Banks invest heavily in guarding against these risks, and the US Treasury department and bank regulators have been working with regulated financial institutions to promote preparedness. But both the size and the nature of private sector investments are going to fall short of what is required to protect the resilience of the financial system.
Policymakers should recognise the attack on Binance for what it is: a warning shot of potentially far worse things to come.
Guarding against hacks that steal billions of dollars and undermine faith in finance requires the public sector to work closely with the private sector to enhance resilience and to develop plans should things go awry.
And allowing the crypto world – a large and growing part of finance – to remain subject to minimal oversight compromises our national wellbeing. Innovation is good but it needs to be coupled with appropriate oversight.
Anil Kashyap is a professor of economics and finance at Chicago Booth. Kathryn Judge, professor at Columbia Law School, contributed to this piece
Exploring Cyprus as a hub for fund management in a fragmented landscape



“市场直觉上认为共和党强势表现对股市有利,对债券不利,反之亦然。”阿尔杰布拉投资(Algebrais Investments)全球信用组合经理加布里埃莱·福阿(Gabriele Foà)表示。
在欧洲,斯托克斯600指数下跌0.5%,而富时100指数下跌1.1%,抹去了前四天的涨幅。
官方数据显示,美国9月份的职位空缺数量增加了333,000个,而8月份的数据也被上调。追踪工厂订单的数据也超出了经济学家的预期。高盛分析师在两项数据发布后,将对第三季度美国GDP增长的估计提高了0.1个百分点,将其提升至3.5%。
政府债券,在最近几个月美国经济过热迹象下承压,在数据发布后进一步走弱。美国两年期国债收益率上升0.03个百分点至4.61%。全球债券市场也出现走弱。英国10年期国债收益率上升0.05个百分点至5.24%,而10年期德国国债收益率上升0.05个百分点至3.34%。
---
市场更新
美国 / 欧元区 / 日本 / 英国 / 中国 / 巴西
---
股市 / S&P 500 / 欧元区300 / 日经225 / FTSE100 / 上证指数 / 博韦斯帕
水平 / 7580.85 / 2573.69 / 63081.86 / 10638.43 / 3608.10 / 165288.62
日变化(%) / 0.52 / -0.60 / 闭市 / -1.14 / -0.82 / -1.57
货币 / 加元指数(DXY) / 加元兑欧元 / 日元兑加元 / 加元兑英镑 / 人民币兑加元 / 里亚尔兑加元
水平 / 101.84 / 1.119 / 158.445 / 1.342 / 6.67 / 5.496
日变化(%) / 0.10 / -0.022 / 0.361 / -0.007 / 0.34 / 1.057
政府债券 / 10年期
财政部 | 10年期德国国债(Bund)< / > 10年期日本国债(JGB)< / > 10年期英国国债(Gilt)< / > 10年期债券< / > | 收益率< / > 4.96< / > 3.31< / > 2.80< / > 5.26< / > 1.63< / > 15.85< / >< / > 当日变动(基点)< / > 0.08< / > 0.02< / > 0.01< / > 0.06< / > -0.02< / > 0.39< / >< / > 全球 / 大宗商品< / > FTSE全球指数< / > 布伦特原油< / > WTI原油< / > 黄金< / > 白银< / > 金属(LMEX)< / >< / > 水平< / > 731.46< / > 103.46< / > 95.97< / > 3927.06< / > 49.69< / > 5756.40< / >< / > 当日变动(%)< / > -0.06< / > -1.25< / > -0.51< / > -1.02< / > -1.88< / > 1.25< / >< / >
注:OCR结果忽略了图像中的单一横线(仅为背景装饰线),符合规则2的要求。图像OCR输出为空,无字符。
主要股票市场


涨跌幅最大股票


价格为2023年11月03日17:00 GMT时的数据
| 欧元区< / >< / > 皇家菲利普斯< / > 4,81< / >< / > 法拉利< / > 4,47< / >< / > 拜耳< / > 3,64< / >< / > LVMH< / > 1,99< / >< / > ABB< / > 1,63< / >< / > 斯坦兰蒂斯< / > -3,88< / >< / > 弗雷森尼乌斯医疗护理< / > -3,60< / >< / > 阿迪达斯< / > -2,75< / >< / > Adyen< / > -2,75< / >< / > 罗技< / > -2,75< / > |
基于FTSE Eurofirst 300欧元区成分股
| 英国< / >< / > 国际工作集团< / > 8.57< / >< / > 德拉克斯集团< / > 6.61< / >< / > 兰克集团< / > 4.02< / >< / > Baltic Classifieds Group< / > 3,38< / >< / > 希斯科克斯< / > 2.97< / >< / > THG< / > -5.53< / >< / > 威瑟斯普恩(JD)< / > -4.92< / >< / > 企业矿业< / > -4.74< / >< / > 巴拉特红木< / > -4.66< / >< / > 阿塔拉亚铜矿< / > -4.41< / > |
所有数据由ICE提供。[www.ice.com](http: / www.ice.com)
\- US stocks edge higher as voters go to the polls for midterm elections
US stock markets rose yesterday, with tech shares rebounding from their recent rout as voters across the country cast their votes in the midterm elections.
The blue-chip S&P 500 rose 0.5 per cent by early afternoon in New York, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index advanced 0.9 per cent, buoyed by semiconductor stocks. Advanced Micro Devices rose 4.9 per cent, Nvidia was up 3.2 per cent and the broader Philadelphia Semiconductor Index of US chip stocks rose 3.3 per cent.
The advance in US equities marked a return to stability following a sell-off over the past week and came as oil prices extended a decline on Monday that was prompted by an unconfirmed report of diplomatic progress in peace talks between the US and Iran.
Brent, the global benchmark for crude, fell 1.3 per cent to \$103.50 a barrel.
The dollar was up 0.1 per cent against a basket of other major currencies on the day that Americans went to the polls.
Prediction platform Polymarket was pricing a 75 per cent chance that the Democrats would take the Senate and an even higher probability of a majority in the House of Representatives.
"Markets would intuitively treat a strong result for Republicans as bullish for equities and bearish for bonds, and the opposite for a Democratic sweep,"
said Gabriele Foà, global credit portfolio manager at Algebrais Investments.
In Europe, the Stoxx 600 index fell 0.5 per cent whilst the FTSE 100 declined by 1.1 per cent, erasing four days of gains.
In Asia, South Korea's Kospi index fell 3.6 per cent whilst the Nikkei 225 slipped 0.3 per cent.
Official data yesterday showed that job openings in the US rose by 333,000 in September, while the figure for August was revised higher. Data tracking factory orders also rose more than economists expected. Analysts from Goldman Sachs added 0.1 percentage point to their
estimate of expanding third-quarter US GDP following the two data releases, taking the figure to 3.5 per cent.
Government bonds, which have come under pressure in recent months amid signs of overheating in the US economy, weakened further after the data. The two-year US Treasury yield rose 0.03 percentage points to 4.61 per cent.
Bond markets also weakened globally. The UK 10-year yield rose 0.05 percentage points to 5.24 per cent, and 10-year Bund yields were up 0.05 percentage points at 3.34 per cent.
Abigail Tobias
Markets update | US | Eurozone | Japan | UK | China | Brazil | Stocks | S&P 500 | Eurofirst 300 | Nikkei 225 | FTSE100 | Shanghai Comp | Bovespa | Level | 7580.85 | 2573.69 | 63081.86 | 10638.43 | 3608.10 | 165288.62 | % change on day | 0.52 | -0.60 | Closed | -1.14 | -0.82 | -1.57 | Currency | $ index (DXY) | $ per € | Yen per $ | $ per £ | Rmb per $ | Real per $ | Level | 101.84 | 1.119 | 158.445 | 1.342 | 6.67 | 5.496 | % change on day | 0.10 | -0.022 | 0.361 | -0.007 | 0.34 | 1.057 | Govt. bonds | 10-Year Treasury | 10-year-Bund | 10-year JGB | 10-Year Gilt | 10-year-bond | 10-year-bond | Yield | 4.96 | 3.31 | 2.80 | 5.26 | 1.63 | 15.85 | Basis point change on day | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | -0.02 | 0.39 | World / Commods | FTSE All-World | Oil - Brent | Oil - WTI | Gold | Silver | Metals (LMEX) | Level | 731.46 | 103.46 | 95.97 | 3927.06 | 49.69 | 5756.40 | % change on day | -0.06 | -1.25 | -0.51 | -1.02 | -1.88 | 1.25 | Main equity markets


Biggest movers


Prices taken at 17:00 GMT Nov 03 |
The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth. |
科斯塔斯·穆尔塞拉斯和
伊恩·史密斯 —— 伦敦
阿梅利亚·波拉德 —— 纽约
马歇尔·韦斯和米伦尼姆管理公司是上个月因投资者对AI泡沫可持续性的担忧而受到冲击的对冲基金之一,导致华尔街科技股牛市出现急剧反转。
由亿万富翁保罗·马歇尔和伊恩·韦斯共同创立的80亿加元对冲基金马歇尔·韦斯,在10月份其两大核心策略均遭亏损,据知情人士透露。
以一支由多名组合经理管理的“欧瑞卡”策略,10月份亏损5.4%,将其年内收益率削减至5.3%。基于数据和模型的“Tops”策略则亏损3.6%,但仍保持年内1.3%的收益。
与此同时,伊扎克·英格兰德的米伦尼姆管理公司(管理资产95亿加元)上个月亏损2.3%,使其在前10个月的年内收益率降至5.7%。
根据数据提供商PivotalPath的数据,全球对冲基金整体上个月亏损3%,其中权益策略表现最差,承受了科技股抛售的冲击。根据PivotalPath的数据,该行业的年内收益率处于中单位数。
亿万富翁肯·格里芬的对冲基金巨头——西塔德(Citadel)逆势而上,其旗舰“威灵顿”基金上月上涨1.7%,年内上涨15.3%。
对冲基金,通过杠杆放大收益,不得不应对被伊朗战争、AI泡沫恐慌、利率上升和美国中期选举等因素交织的金融市场。纳斯达克100指数上周跌入修正区域,自10月6日创下的纪录高点下跌10%,因表现平平的科技股业绩加剧了对大规模AI投资何时能盈利的担忧。
美国政府持有少量股份的英特尔(Intel)是最大的受损者之一,在芯片制造商有史以来最严重的单日跌幅(1974年以来)中下跌29%。
“一周来非常糟糕”,一位首席经纪人在纳斯达克下跌3.5%后评论道,描述了对冲基金在市场动荡中遭遇的困境。
债券市场也经历了一个动荡的月份,特别是在欧元区,随着油价上涨和法国政治危机加深,对其主权债务前景的担忧加剧。法国和意大利的债券相对于避险资产德国联邦债券(Bunds)和等期限欧元利率互换出现抛售,导致相对价值和流动性交易出现大幅波动,这些交易是对冲基金的热门选择。
马歇尔·韦斯、米伦尼姆和西塔德均拒绝置评。
| 27190.86< / > 25351.86< / > | 注:上述数据为过去30天美洲股市走势,与同币种富时全球指数(FTSE All-World)进行比较。

美洲

过去30天股市走势,与同币种的富时全球指数(FTSE All-World)进行比较
COSTAS MOURSELAS AND
IAN SMITH — LONDON
AMELIA POLLARD — NEW YORK
Marshall Wace and Millennium Management were among the hedge funds hit last month as investor worries over the sustainability of the AI boom triggered a sharp reversal in Wall Street's tech rally.
Marshall Wace, the \$80bn hedge fund co-founded by billionaires Paul Marshall and Ian Wace, saw its two key strategies fall in October, according to people who had seen the numbers.
The Eureka strategy, which is managed by a team of portfolio managers, was down 5.4 per cent in October, trimming its year-to-date gain to 5.3 per cent. The data- and model-driven Tops strategy lost 3.6 per cent, remaining up 1.3 per cent for the year.
Meanwhile, Izzy Englander's Millennium, which manages \$95bn, was down 2.3 per cent last month, leaving it with a 5.7 per cent gain for the first 10 months of the year.
Global hedge funds, in aggregate, lost 3 per cent last month, according to data provider PivotalPath, with equity strategies faring worst as they bore the brunt of the tech sell-off. Year-to-date gains for the industry stand in the mid-single digits, according to PivotalPath.
Billionaire Ken Griffin's hedge fund giant Citadel bucked the trend, with its
flagship Wellington fund rising 1.7 per cent for the month and up 15.3 per cent for the year.
Hedge funds, which use leverage to magnify gains, have had to navigate financial markets that have been simultaneously whipsawed by the war in Iran, AI bubble fears, rising interest rates and the US midterm elections.
The Nasdaq 100 index tumbled into correction territory last week after falling 10 per cent from its October 6 record high, as lacklustre tech earnings fuelled fears about how long it will take for the vast investments in AI to turn a profit.
Intel, in which the US government has a minor stake, was among the biggest losers, falling 29 per cent in the chip-maker's worst one-day drop since 1974.
“It’s been an ugly week all around,” said one prime broker after the Nasdaq dropped 3.5 per cent on Friday, describing how hedge funds had fared in the market upheaval.
Bond markets also endured a volatile month, particularly in the Eurozone, as oil prices climbed and France's political crisis deepened, feeding nerves about the outlook for its sovereign debt. French and Italian bonds sold off against haven German Bunds and against equivalent-duration euro interest rate swaps, resulting in big moves for relative value and spread trades that are popular with hedge funds.
Marshall Wace, Millennium and Citadel all declined to comment. | 27190.86 | 25351.86 | 
AMERICAS

Stock Market movements over last 30 days, with the FTSE All-World in the same currency as a comparison
道琼斯工业平均指数
Dow Jones Ind
FTSE 100
FTSE 欧洲首选指数
-0.60%
-1.14%
日经指数
闭市
日变化 ↗ 0.52% / 月变化 ↘ -1.88% / 年变化 ↗ 10.59%
---
Nasdaq Composite / 纽约
IPC / 日变化 ▼ -0.69% / 月变化 ▲ 0.51% / 年变化 ▲ 29.43%
---
墨西哥城 / 64531.68 / 70603.90
日变化 ▷ -1.14%
月变化 ▷ 1.84%
年变化 ▷ 9.83%
日变化 ▷ -0.34%
月变化 ▷ 1.36%
年变化 ▷ 9.59%
国家 / 指数 / 最新 / 上期
澳大利亚 / 澳大利亚全普通股指数 / 9308.90 / 8977.20
澳大利亚 / S&P ASX 200 / 8886.80 / 8856.50
澳大利亚 / S&P ASX 200 指数 / 7107.30 / 7162.40
奥地利 / AIX / 6396.13 / 6430.27
比利时 / BEL 20 / 5837.52 / 5876.76
比利时 / BEL Mid / 6448.92 / 6470.71
巴西 / Bovespa / 165288.62 / 167921.60
加拿大 / S&P TSX 60 / 2117.03 / 2135.53
加拿大 / S&P TSX 综合指数 / 35554.91 / 35801.69
智利 / S&P / OLX IGPA 综合指数 / 56920.02
中国 / 中国FSE A200 / 10001.78 / 10067.56
中国 / 上海A股 / 3763.02 / 3814.59
中国 / 上海B股 / 2867.40 / 2876.98
中国 / 上海综合指数 / 3608.18 / 3638.03
中国 / 深圳A股 / 2169.01 / 2194.18
中国 / 深圳B股 / 1134.60 / 1137.44
克罗地亚 / CROBEX / 4407.77 / 4425.65
塞浦路斯 / CSE M&P 综合指数 / 305.61 / 310.31
恒生指数
日变化 ▷ -0.34%
月变化 ▷ 1.96%
年变化 ▷ -0.72%
国家 / 指数 / 最新 / 上期
捷克共和国 / 捷克共和国PX / 2645.31 / 2638.01
丹麦 / DMX 哥本哈根20 / 1648.67 / 1646.11
埃及 / EGX 30 / 49255.70 / 48403.10
爱沙尼亚 / OMX 塔林 / 2240.78 / 2240.51
芬兰 / OMX 赫尔辛基综合 / 12950.96 / 12988.77
法国 / 法国CAC40 / 8020.31 / 8047.69
法国 / SIB 120 / 6076.49 / 6094.49
德国 / M-DAX / 30743.36 / 30855.37
德国 / Tec-DAX / 4092.59 / 4115.74
德国 / XETRA DAX / 25864.62 / 25881.09
希腊 / 雅典 / 2618.12 / 2602.41
希腊 / FTSE / ASIA / 6697.84 / 6659.10
香港 / 恒生指数 / 23525.97 / 23393.32
香港 / HS 企业指数 / 7943.10 / 7906.11
香港 / HSCC 红筹指数 / 3961.37 / 3911.75
匈牙利 / BUX / 146075.44 / 145330.02
印度 / BSE 感指 / 76917.85 / 75692.78
印度尼西亚 / 雅加达综合指数 / 4904.29 / 5096.83
10月02日 – 11月03日 | Xetra DAX< / > 法兰克福< / >< / > 指数< / > 全球< / >< / > 25231.2< / > 25864.62< / > |
国家< / > 指数< / > 最新< / > 前值< / >< / >
爱尔兰< / > ISEQ Overall< / > 14353.34< / > 14417.86< / >< / >
以色列< / > 特拉维夫125< / > 3922.18< / > 3837.93< / >< / >
意大利< / > FTSE Italia All-Share< / > 52549.75< / > 52585.45< / >< / >
意大利< / > FTSE Italia Mid Cap< / > 61431.16< / > 61593.73< / >< / >
意大利< / > FTSE MIB< / > 49941.83< / > 49947.94< / >< / >
日本< / > 日经225< / > 63081.86< / >< / >
日本< / > TOPIX< / > 3930.28< / >< / >
科威特< / > KSK Index< / > 8412.35< / > 8300.82< / >< / >
拉脱维亚< / > OMX里加< / > 999.34< / > 993.68< / >< / >
立陶宛< / > OMX维尔纽斯< / > 1487.02< / > 1450.18< / >< / >
卢森堡< / > Lux< / > 1903.79< / > 1904.29< / >< / >
墨西哥< / > PC Mexico City< / > 70603.90< / > 69779.20< / >< / >
马来西亚< / > FTSE Bursa KLD< / > 1621.85< / > 1619.51< / >< / >
摩洛哥< / > MASI< / > 16390.89< / > 16517.12< / >< / >
荷兰< / > AEX< / > 1121.76< / > 1132.54< / >< / >
荷兰< / > AEX All Share< / > 1492.60< / > 1508.28< / >< / >
新西兰< / > NZX 50< / > 13720.26< / > 13698.63< / >< / >
尼日利亚< / > SE All Share< / > 254289.35< / > 254245.21< / >< / >
|
股市:最大涨跌
FTSE全球指数
美元 / 欧元
日 ▷ -0.01% 月 ▷ -0.80% 年 ▷ 15.86%
国家< / > 指数< / > 最新< / > 前值< / >< / >
挪威< / > Oslo All Share< / > 2514.81< / > 2533.67< / >< / >
巴基斯坦< / > KSE 100< / > 168018.86< / > 166564.07< / >< / >
菲律宾< / > Manila Comp< / > 5624.17< / > 5680.35< / >< / >
波兰< / > WIG< / > 155849.82< / > 156383.04< / >< / >
葡萄牙< / > PSI 20< / > 9233.89< / > 9352.46< / >< / >
葡萄牙< / > PSI General< / > 6276.04< / > 5288.08< / >< / >
罗马尼亚< / > Romania BET Index< / > 34803.25< / > 35086.93< / >< / >
俄罗斯< / > Russia Traded Index in USD< / > 988.10< / >< / >
沙特阿拉伯< / > TAHANUL All Share Index< / > 9676.13< / > 9882.85< / >< / >
新加坡< / > FTSE Straits Times< / > 5269.29< / > 5303.83< / >< / >
斯洛伐克< / > SAX< / > 319.87< / > 320.30< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">南非< / > SBI TOP< / > 2958.9< / >< / >
FTSE / JSE All Share Index< / > 109275.30< / > 109527.80< / >< / >
南非< / > FTSE / JSE Res< / > 61397.63< / > 61751.40< / >< / >
南非< / > FTSE / JSE Top 40< / > 101192.33< / > 101438.67< / >< / >
韩国< / > KOSPI< / > 5648.79< / > 5859.08< / >< / >
韩国< / > KOSPI 200< / > 885.87< / > 920.63< / >< / >
西班牙< / > IBEX 35< / > 18807.20< / > 18957.80< / >< / >
|
欧洲市场
活跃股票
英国市场涨跌榜
日 ▷ -0.82% 月 ▷ -6.09% 年 ▷ -9.26%
国家 | 指数< / > 最新< / > 前值< / > |
瑞典< / > DMX 斯德哥尔摩30< / > 3294.44< / > 3287.02< / >< / >
瑞典< / > DMX 斯德哥尔摩AS< / > 1136.89< / > 1138.00< / >< / >
瑞士< / > SMI指数< / > 14743.09< / > 14802.52< / >< / >
台湾< / > 加权股价指数< / > 43307.54< / > 44520.14< / >< / >
泰国< / > SET指数< / > 1481.01< / > 1507.20< / >< / >
土耳其< / > BIST 100< / > 11023.55< / > 10961.67< / >< / >
英国< / > FTSE 100< / > 10038.43< / > 10761.33< / >< / >
英国< / > FTSE 4Good UK< / > 9296.13< / > 9396.65< / >< / >
英国< / > FTSE 全部股票指数< / > 5746.54< / > 5608.28< / >< / >
英国< / > FTSE techMARK 100< / > 9761.22< / > 9753.47< / >< / >
美国< / > 道琼斯综合指数< / > 16438.56< / > 16467.22< / >< / >
美国< / > 道琼斯工业平均指数< / > 51808.64< / > 51983.99< / >< / >
美国< / > 道琼斯运输指数< / > 20895.94< / > 20842.92< / >< / >
美国< / > 道琼斯公用事业指数< / > 430.94< / > 431.33< / >< / >
美国< / > 纳斯达克-100指数< / > 28172.20< / > 27989.82< / >< / >
美国< / > 纳斯达克综合指数< / > 25051.86< / > 25164.36< / >< / >
美国< / > 纽约证券交易所综合指数< / > 24363.13< / > 24372.07< / >< / >
美国< / > 标普500指数< / > 7560.85< / > 7541.40< / >< / >
美国< / > 道琼斯工业平均指数(30种股票)< / > 100< / > 500< / >< / >
|
$兑£ ¥兑$
0.3610%
| 美洲< / >< / >
活跃股票< / > 交易股票(百万股)< / > 收盘价< / > 当日变化< / >< / >
英特尔< / > 73.03< / > 61.02< / > 1.05< / >< / >
英伟达< / > 43.66< / > 208.79< / > 6.73< / >< / >
帕拉蒂尔< / > 33.25< / > 174.54< / > -3.80< / >< / >
苹果< / > 32.24< / > 331.33< / > -6.99< / >< / >
超微半导体< / > 18.21< / > 31.75< / > —< / >< / >
谷歌(Alphabet CI A)< / > 16.43< / > 280.37< / > 1.38< / >< / >
亚马逊< / > 14.39< / > 248.56< / > 2.93< / >< / >
凯瑞格百事< / > 14.01< / > 34.95< / > -1.86< / >< / >
高通< / > 13.30< / > 492.54< / > 25.70< / >< / >
特斯拉< / > 13.09< / > 397.27< / > -6.54< / >< / >
道琼斯工业平均指数(30种股票)< / > 4< / > —< / >< / >
|
活跃股票< / > 交易股票(百万股)< / > 收盘价< / > 当日变化< / >< / >
因特萨银行< / > 58.34< / > 5.99< / > 0.03< / >< / >
斯坦塔斯< / > 40.98< / > 4.08< / > -0.16< / >< / >
桑坦德银行< / > 19.74< / > 10.23< / > -0.15< / >< / >
皇家KPN< / > 14.42< / > 4.32< / > —< / >< / >
萨巴德银行< / > 11.25< / > 3.48< / > —< / >< / >
诺基亚< / > 10.22< / > 7.65< / > -0.03< / >< / >
恩尔集团< / > 10.14< / > 9.32< / > -0.01< / >< / >
电信公司< / > 8.00< / > 3.34< / > -0.04< / >< / >
ING集团< / > 7.86< / > 27.71< / > -0.42< / >< / >
埃尼集团< / > 7.74< / > 26.04< / > -0.48< / >< / >
活跃股票 |
股票成交量(百万股)< / >
收盘价< / >
当日变动< / >
|
劳埃德银行集团< / >
199.62< / >
0.94< / >
-0.02< / >
< / >
巴克莱银行< / >
78.64< / >
4.20< / >
-0.05< / >
< / >
英国石油公司(BP)< / >
62.82< / >
5.89< / >
-0.11< / >
海伦集团(Haleon)< / >
37.22< / >
3.26< / >
0.02< / >
汇丰银行(HSBC)< / >
35.07< / >
12.58< / >
-0.25< / >
罗尔斯·罗伊斯< / >
29.66< / >
12.61< / >
-0.16< / >
格伦科尔(Glencore)< / >
27.31< / >
5.04< / >
-0.15< / >
沃达丰< / >
24.88< / >
1.17< / >
-< / >
国家西部银行集团(NatWest Group)< / >
18.91< / >
5.80< / >
-0.12< / >
泰勒·温佩伊(Taylor Wimpey)< / >
17.55< / >
0.82< / >
-0.02< / >
最大涨跌股< / >
收盘价< / >
当日变动< / >
|
活跃股票< / >
股票成交量(百万股)< / >
安普特斯特(Advantest)< / >
0.00< / >
35770.00< / >
-< / >
伊藤洋华堂(Aeon Co)< / >
0.00< / >
1204.50< / >
AGC< / >
5481.00< / >
味之素(Ajinomoto)< / >
5128.00< / >
阿尔卑斯山(Alps Alpine)< / >
1856.50< / >
阿玛达(Amada Co)< / >
2418.50< / >
ANA航空控股(ANA Holdings)< / >
3075.00< / >
青空(Aozora)< / >
2981.00< / >
阿奇翁(Archion)< / >
275.00< / >
朝日集团(Asahi Group)< / >
1671.00< / >
|
FTSE 100
FTSE EuroFirst
-0.60%
-1.14%
Nikkei
Closed



Day ▷ -0.34% Month ▷ 1.36% Year ▷ 9.59% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Australia | All Ordinaries | 9308.90 | 8977.20 | Australia | S&P ASX 200 | 8886.80 | 8856.50 | Australia | S&P ASX 200 Res | 7107.30 | 7162.40 | Austria | AIX | 6396.13 | 6430.27 | Belgium | BEL 20 | 5837.52 | 5876.76 | Belgium | BEL Mid | 6448.92 | 6470.71 | Brazil | Bovespa | 165288.62 | 167921.60 | Canada | S&P TSX 60 | 2117.03 | 2135.53 | Canada | S&P TSX Comp | 35554.91 | 35801.69 | Chile | SS&P/OLX IGPA GEN | 56920.02 | 56920.02 | China | China FSE A200 | 10001.78 | 10067.56 | China | China Shanghai A | 3763.02 | 3814.59 | China | China Shanghai B | 2867.4 | 2768.98 | China | China Shanghai Comp | 3608.18 | 3638.03 | China | Shenzhen A | 2169.01 | 2194.18 | China | Shenzhen B | 1134.60 | 1137.44 | Croatia | CROBEX | 4407.77 | 4425.65 | Cyprus | CSE M&P GEN | 305.61 | 310.31 | Hang Seng
Day ▷ -0.34% Month ▷ 1.96% Year ▷ -0.72% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Czech Republic | Czech Republic PX | 2645.31 | 2638.01 | Denmark | DMX Copenhagen 20 | 1648.67 | 1646.11 | Egypt | EGX 30 | 49255.70 | 48403.10 | Estonia | OMX Tallinn | 2240.78 | 2240.51 | Finland | OMX Helsinki General | 12950.96 | 12988.77 | France | French CAC40 | 8020.31 | 8047.69 | France | SIB 120 | 6076.49 | 6094.49 | Germany | M-OAX | 30743.36 | 30855.37 | Germany | Tec-Dax | 4092.59 | 4115.74 | Germany | XETRA Dax | 25864.62 | 25881.09 | Greece | Athens | 2618.12 | 2602.41 | Greece | FTSE/ASIA | 6697.84 | 6659.10 | Hong Kong | Hang Seng | 23525.97 | 23393.32 | Hong Kong | HS China Enterprises | 7943.10 | 7906.11 | Hong Kong | HSCC Red Chip | 3961.37 | 3911.75 | Hungary | Bux | 146075.44 | 145330.02 | India | BSE Sensex | 76917.85 | 75692.78 | Indonesia | Jakarta Comp | 4904.29 | 5096.83 |
FTSE All World
\$ per €
Day ▷ -0.01% Month ▷ -0.80% Year ▷ 15.86% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Norway | Oslo All Share | 2514.81 | 2533.67 | Pakistan | KSE 100 | 168018.86 | 166564.07 | Philippines | Manila Comp | 5624.17 | 5680.35 | Poland | Wig | 155849.62 | 156383.04 | Portugal | PSI 20 | 9233.89 | 9326.46 | Portugal | PSI General | 6276.04 | 5288.08 | Romania | Romania BET Index | 34803.25 | 35086.93 | Russia | Russia Traded Index in USD | 988.10 | 988.10 | Saudi Arabia | TAHANUL All Share Index | 9676.13 | 9882.85 | Singapore | FTSE Snabs Times | 5269.29 | 5303.83 | Slovakia | SAX | 319.87 | 320.30 |
ACTIVE STOCKS
UK MARKET WINNERS & LOSERS
Day ▷ -0.82% Month ▷ -6.09% Year ▷ -9.26% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Sweden | DMX Stockholm 30 | 3294.44 | 3287.02 | Sweden | DMX Stockholm AS | 1136.89 | 1138.00 | Switzerland | SMI Index | 14743.09 | 14802.52 | Taiwan | Weighted Stock Index | 43307.54 | 44520.14 | Thailand | Bangkok SET | 1481.01 | 1507.20 | Turkey | BIST 100 | 11023.55 | 10961.67 | UK | FTSE 100 | 10038.43 | 10761.33 | UK | FTSE 4Good UK | 9296.13 | 9396.65 | UK | FTSE All Share | 5746.54 | 5608.28 | UK | FTSE techMARK 100 | 9761.22 | 9753.47 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Composite | 16438.56 | 16467.22 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Industrial | 51808.64 | 51983.69 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Transport | 20895.94 | 20842.92 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Utilities | 430.94 | 431.33 | U.S.A. | Nasdaq 100 | 28172.20 | 27989.82 | U.S.A. | Nasdaq Composite | 25051.86 | 25164.36 | U.S.A. | NYSE Composite | 24363.13 | 24372.07 | U.S.A. | S&P 500 | 7560.85 | 7541.40 | \$ per £ ¥ per \$
0.3610% |
FTSE 100 |
价格(£)< / >
周涨跌(%)< / >
年内涨跌(%)< / > | 涨幅股< / >
< / >
3i集团< / >
25.62< / >
7.74< / >
-21.48< / >
< / >
阿斯利康< / >
137.60< / >
7.32< / >
-0.22< / >
惠特布雷德< / >
27.80< / >
7.25< / >
9.02< / >
Hiscox< / >
19.39< / >
6.36< / >
36.26< / >
ICG< / >
19.12< / >
5.75< / >
-6.91< / >
里卡迪·班克西斯< / >
55.10< / >
5.60< / >
-11.87< / >
普鲁登シャル< / >
9.44< / >
5.57< / >
-17.50< / >
巴博科国际< / >
10.47< / >
5.51< / >
-15.73< / >
WPP< / >
4.13< / >
5.49< / >
22.43< / >
BT集团< / >
2.23< / >
4.45< / >
21.11< / >
|
日涨幅:1.62%
月涨幅:6.96%
年内涨幅:-8.41%
国家 / 地区< / >
指数< / >
最新< / >
前值< / >
委内瑞拉< / >
IBC< / >
8468.10< / >
8479.81< / >
越南< / >
越南指数< / >
1689.02< / >
1710.72< / >
跨境< / >
欧罗斯托克斯50(欧元)< / >
6144.95< / >
6176.06< / >
荷兰< / >
欧罗奈克斯100 ID< / >
1870.83< / >
1879.99< / >
跨境< / >
FTSE食品全球($)< / >
20885.40< / >
20856.02< / >
FTSE全球($)< / >
731.92< / >
731.91< / >
FTSE £300< / >
2573.69< / >
2589.34< / >
FTSE欧罗托普100< / >
4942.13< / >
4977.12< / >
FTSE全球100($)< / >
5563.13< / >
5534.58< / >
FTSE黄金矿业($)< / >
5071.33< / >
5071.33< / >
FTSE垃圾桶指数(欧元)< / >
5542.60< / >
5738.60< / >
FTSE世界($)< / >
1370.23< / >
1370.61< / >
FTSE欧罗菲斯特100(欧元)< / >
7024.23< / >
7073.68< / >
FTSE欧罗菲斯特80 ID< / >
8363.45< / >
8403.85< / >
|
£ / €
| 跌幅股< / >
海伦< / >
3.26< / >
-10.70< / >
-13.13< / >
安大略< / >
35.57< / >
-10.70< / >
-8.14< / >
纳西韦斯特集团< / >
5.80< / >
-8.57< / >
-11.02< / >
劳埃德银行集团< / >
0.94< / >
-8.27< / >
-4.62< / >
伊萨卡能源< / >
2.81< / >
-8.11< / >
69.48< / >
极地科技< / >
5.83< / >
-7.31< / >
25.75< / >
格伦科尔< / >
5.04< / >
-6.92< / >
24.04< / >
巴拉特红木< / >
3.19< / >
-5.59< / >
-16.29< / >
安托法加斯塔< / >
31.38< / >
-5.22< / >
-4.30< / >
力拓< / >
60.78< / >
-5.03< / >
1.40< / >
-0.0120%
FTSE 250< / >
价格(£)< / >
周涨跌(%)< / >
年内涨跌(%)< / >
| 涨幅股< / >
排名集团< / >
0.91< / >
14.83< / >
-8.76< / >
国际工作集团< / >
2.14< / >
13.33< / >
-7.43< / >
萨加< / >
9.10< / >
7.06< / >
132.44< / >
塞维尔斯< / >
11.32< / >
6.59< / >
13.65< / >
第一集团< / >
2.34< / >
6.45< / >
22.98< / >
德拉克斯集团< / >
8.62< / >
6.35< / >
3.05< / >
安泰因< / >
4.79< / >
5.83< / >
-37.50< / >
基尼蒂克集团< / >
5.50< / >
5.07< / >
24.43< / >
宠物之家< / >
2.55< / >
4.77< / >
28.59< / >
摩根先进材料< / >
2.67< / >
4.72< / >
22.25< / >
涨幅最大 | < / > 收盘价< / > 日变动< / > 日变动%< / >< / > | 涨< / >< / > 菲利普斯(皇家)< / > 25.70< / > 1.18< / > 4.81< / >< / > 法拉利< / > 375.00< / > 16.05< / > 4.47< / >< / > 拜耳< / > 51.84< / > 1.82< / > 3.64< / >< / > LVMH< / > 401.50< / > 7.85< / > 1.99< / >< / > ABB< / > 72.50< / > 1.16< / > 1.63< / >< / > | 跌< / >< / > 斯坦塔斯< / > 4.08< / > -0.16< / > -3.88< / >< / > 弗雷森尼乌斯医疗护理< / > 39.04< / > -1.46< / > -3.60< / >< / > 阿迪达斯< / > 168.10< / > -4.75< / > -2.75< / >< / > Adyen< / > 827.80< / > -23.40< / > -2.75< / >< / > 罗技< / > 76.36< / > -2.16< / > -2.75< / > |
黄金(美元)
涨幅最大< / > 收盘价< / > 日变动< / > 日变动%< / >< / > | 涨< / >< / > 安普特斯特< / > 35770.00< / > -< / >< / > 伊藤洋华堂< / > 1204.50< / > -< / >< / > AGC< / > 5481.00< / > -< / >< / > 味之素< / > 5128.00< / > -< / >< / > 阿尔卑斯山脉股份< / > 1856.50< / > -< / >< / > | 跌< / >< / > 安普特斯特< / > 35770.00< / > -< / >< / > 伊藤洋华堂< / > 1204.50< / > -< / >< / > AGC< / > 5481.00< / > -< / >< / > 味之素< / > 5128.00< / > -< / >< / > 阿尔卑斯山脉股份< / > 1856.50< / > -< / > |
涨幅最大< / > 收盘价< / > 日变动< / > 日变动%< / >< / > | 涨< / >< / > 菲瑟维< / > 58.15< / > 6.22< / > 11.98< / >< / > Revity< / > 169.05< / > 17.45< / > 11.51< / >< / > GE Vernova< / > 920.68< / > 58.43< / > 6.78< / >< / > 甲骨文< / > 126.79< / > 7.57< / > 6.35< / >< / > 惠普企业< / > 54.15< / > 2.96< / > 5.78< / >< / > | 跌< / >< / > 西斯科< / > 74.80< / > -6.94< / > -8.49< / >< / > 巴尔公司< / > 64.06< / > -4.01< / > -5.89< / >< / > 阿波罗全球管理< / > 113.21< / > -6.25< / > -5.23< / >< / > 凯瑞格·德佩勒< / > 34.95< / > -1.86< / > -5.07< / >< / > 阿彻·丹尼尔斯·米德兰< / > 72.16< / > -3.61< / > -4.76< / > | 涨幅最大< / >< / > < / > 收盘价< / > 日变动< / > 日变动%< / >< / > | 涨< / >< / > Advantest< / > 35770.00< / > -< / >< / > Aeon Co< / > 1204.50< / > -< / >< / > AGC< / > 5481.00< / > -< / >< / > Ajinomoto< / > 5128.00< / > -< / >< / > 阿尔卑斯山脉股份< / > 1856.50< / > -< / >< / > | 跌< / >< / > Advantest< / > 35770.00< / > -< / >< / > Aeon Co< / > 1204.50< / > -< / >< / > AGC< / > 5481.00< / > -< / >< / > Ajinomoto< / > 5128.00< / > -< / >< / > 阿尔卑斯山脉股份< / > 1856.50< / > -< / > |
输家 | 13< / > Hunting< / > 3.78< / > -11.16< / > 2.02< / >< / >
14< / > Allianz Tech< / > 6.46< / > -10.15< / > 22.58< / >< / >
12< / > Metro Bank< / > 1.53< / > -9.49< / > 26.53< / >< / >
52< / > Softcat< / > 16.12< / > -6.77< / > 13.76< / >< / >
48< / > Pan African Res< / > 1.04< / > -6.67< / > -14.38< / >< / >
75< / > Atalaya Mining Copper< / > 8.24< / > -6.52< / > -3.57< / >< / >
34< / > Raspberry Pi Holdings< / > 5.21< / > -6.38< / > 73.55< / >< / >
29< / > Energean< / > 7.17< / > -5.97< / > -19.07< / >< / >
30< / > AEP Plantations< / > 1.54< / > -5.64< / > 12.41< / >< / >
40< / > BlackRock World Mining Trust< / > 8.40< / > -5.51< / > 4.48< / >< / >
|
FTSE 小盘股< / > 价格(£)< / > 周涨跌幅(%)< / > 年内涨跌幅(%)< / >< / >
| 赢家< / >< / >
Mobico Group< / > 0.44< / > 12.02< / > 90.81< / >< / >
Speedy Hire< / > 0.14< / > 9.89< / > -44.00< / >< / >
Evoke< / > 0.47< / > 9.30< / > 111.71< / >< / >
VH Global Energy Infrastructure< / > 0.63< / > 6.06< / > -4.26< / >< / >
C&C Group< / > 1.07< / > 5.73< / > -20.74< / >< / >
PureTech Health< / > 1.24< / > 5.08< / > -0.80< / >< / >
PayPoint< / > 7.58< / > 4.98< / > 60.19< / >< / >
Stelrad Group< / > 1.55< / > 4.72< / > 10.32< / >< / >
Chrysalis Investments< / > 0.67< / > 4.72< / > -44.03< / >< / >
The Beauty Tech Group< / > 5.10< / > 4.72< / > 75.86< / >< / >
|
行业板块< / > 价格(£)< / > 周涨跌幅(%)< / > 年内涨跌幅(%)< / >< / >
| 赢家< / >< / >
不动产投资与服务< / > 2215.83< / > 4.60< / > 3.46< / >< / >
电力< / > 15106.14< / > 3.88< / > 15.19< / >< / >
非寿险< / > 6249.08< / > 3.50< / > 35.81< / >< / >
消费数字服务< / > 193.64< / > 2.94< / > 1.30< / >< / >
投资银行与经纪< / > 14805.55< / > 2.91< / > -4.31< / >< / >
旅游与休闲< / > 10805.93< / > 2.91< / > 7.58< / >< / >
寿险< / > 8208.15< / > 2.66< / > 0.76< / >< / >
金融与信贷服务< / > 15105.65< / > 2.52< / > 4.31< / >< / >
医疗保健提供商< / > 11096.67< / > 2.17< / > 39.83< / >< / >
工业支持服务< / > 11232.44< / > 1.93< / > 2.94< / >< / >
| 输家< / >< / >
2.02< / > Vanquis Banking Gp< / > 0.45< / > -35.81< / > -62.3< / >< / >
22.58< / > Ibstock< / > 0.74< / > -13.52< / > -47.1< / >< / >
26.53< / > Capita< / > 2.54< / > -13.31< / > -37.3< / >< / >
13.76< / > The Smarter Web Company< / > 0.40< / > -13.12< / > 23.0< / >< / >
14.38< / > Ecora Royalties< / > 1.38< / > -10.65< / > 19.6< / >< / >
-3.57< / > City Natural Resources G&I< / > 3.55< / > -8.97< / > < / >< / >
73.55< / > Geiger Counter< / > 0.43< / > -8.23< / > -27.5< / >< / >
19.07< / > Tullow Oil< / > 0.10< / > -7.95< / > 58.6< / >< / >
12.41< / > Capital< / > 1.07< / > -7.73< / > -5.7< / >< / >
4.48< / > Blackrock Latin American Inv Tst< / > 3.78< / > -7.13< / > -6.4< / >< / >
Losers | 62.37< / > Precious Metals & Mining< / > 28356.89< / > -7.87 -17.87< / >< / >
47.10< / > Tech Hardware & Equip< / > 105.16< / > -6.38 73.56< / >< / >
37.36< / > Alternative Energy< / > 28.21< / > -5.26 28.30< / >< / >
23.08< / > Industrial Metals & Mining< / > 8351.09< / > -5.15 12.54< / >< / >
19.86< / > Basic Materials< / > 9236.85< / > -5.11 9.87< / >< / >
-< / > Banks< / > 7985.34< / > -3.45 0.76< / >< / >
27.50< / > Energy< / > 12711.02< / > -2.35 39.14< / >< / >
58.84< / > Oil Gas & Coal< / > 12097.30< / > -2.34 39.18< / >< / >
-5.70< / > Household Goods & Home Construction< / > 8860.95< / > -2.09 -17.84< / >< / >
-6.44< / > Leisure Goods< / > 37260.91< / > -1.95 -16.92< / >< / >
|
< rowspan="2">Nov 03< / > | DOLLAR< / > | EURO< / > POUND< / >< / >
Closing Mid< / > Day's Change< / > Week's Mid< / > Closing < / > Day's Change< / > Week's < / > Closing < / >< / >
Argentine Peso< / > 1547.7844< / > 4.0119< / > 9.1219< / > 1732.6449< / > 4.1052< / > 17.9467< / > 2076.4034< / >< / >
Australian Dollar< / > 1.4330< / > 0.0078< / > 0.0115< / > 1.6041< / > 0.0084< / > 0.0200< / > 1.9224< / >< / >
Bahraini Dinar< / > 0.3772< / > -0.0001< / > 9.4223< / > -0.0002< / > 0.0017< / > 0.5061< / >< / >
Bolivian Boliviano< / > 12.0693< / > -0.0200< / > 9.0708< / > 13.5342< / > -0.0255< / > 0.1386< / > 1.0193< / >< / >
Brazilian Real< / > 5.4963< / > 0.0575< / > 0.1561< / > 6.1529< / > 0.0630< / > 2.2014< / > 7.3736< / >< / >
Canadian Dollar< / > 1.3991< / > 0.0026< / > -0.0046< / > 1.5663< / > 0.0026< / > 0.0019< / > 1.8771< / >< / >
Chilean Peso< / > 988.6500< / > 4.0200< / > -0.2250< / > 1097.7887< / > 4.2560< / > 4.6414< / > 1315.5971< / >< / >
Chinese Yuan< / > 6.6761< / > 0.0302< / > 0.0082< / > 7.4736< / > 0.0321< / > 0.0424< / > 8.9564< / >< / >
Colombian Peso< / > 3246.2200< / > 51.3000< / > 88.8400< / > 3633.9811< / > 56.6291< / > 115.2388< / > 434.9867< / >< / >
Costa Rican Colon< / > 451.5250< / > -1.3450< / > -1.8600< / > 505.4601< / > -1.6188< / > 3.1948< / > 605.7440< / >< / >
Czech Koruna< / > 21.7274< / > 0.0080< / > -0.0071< / > 24.3340< / > -0.0035< / > 0.0151< / > 3.6119< / >< / >
Danish Krone< / > 6.6761< / > 0.0014< / > -0.0305< / > 7.4735< / > -< / > -0.0006< / > 8.9563< / >< / >
Egyptian Pound< / > 55.3100< / > -0.0400< / > -0.7900< / > 61.9188< / > -0.0586< / > -0.6038< / > 74.2011< / >< / >
Hong Kong Dollar< / > 7.8469< / > -0.0002< / > 5.0010< / > 8.7520< / > -0.0022< / > 0.0460< / > 1.0427< / >< / >
Hungarian Forint< / > 325.6286< / > 0.3183< / > -3.1210< / > 364.5250< / > -2.7550< / > -1.8500< / > 436.8471< / >< / >
Indian Rupee< / > 94.7525< / > -0.1437< / > -0.3713< / > 106.0707< / > -0.1847< / > 0.0600< / > 127.1152< / >< / >
|
美元 | 欧元< / >
| 英镑< / >
|
周变化< / >
11月03日< / >
收盘中间价< / >
当日变化< / >
周变化< / >
收盘中间价< / >
当日变化< / >
< / >
28,086< / >
印度尼西亚卢比< / >
18140.0000< / >
-5.0000< / >
-10.0000< / >
20306.8230< / >
-10.1340< / >
79.5550< / >
24335.7180< / >
-8.5230< / >
< / >
0.0300< / >
以色列新谢克尔< / >
3.1627< / >
0.0219< / >
0.1387< / >
3.5405< / >
0.0237< / >
0.1704< / >
4.2430< / >
0.0291< / >
03< / >
日本日元< / >
158.4450< / >
0.5700< / >
0.5800< / >
177.3173< / >
0.5986< / >
1.4386< / >
212.5618< / >
0.7488< / >
0.2172< / >
卡莫马苏< / >
129.6500< / >
-0.0500< / >
0.0500< / >
145.4735< / >
-0.0884< / >
0.7420< / >
138.5285< / >
-0.0801< / >
0.2642< / >
科威特第纳尔< / >
0.3110< / >
0.0003< / >
0.0003< / >
0.3488< / >
0.0001< / >
0.0019< / >
0.4180< / >
0.0001< / >
0.0383< / >
马来西亚林吉特< / >
4.0770< / >
0.0085< / >
-0.0120< / >
4.5640< / >
0.0063< / >
0.0071< / >
4.5695< / >
0.0083< / >
0.7388< / >
墨西哥比索< / >
18.7270< / >
0.1614< / >
0.0880< / >
20.5940< / >
0.1760< / >
0.1917< / >
21.1232< / >
0.2146< / >
0.0794< / >
新西兰元< / >
1.7798< / >
0.0032< / >
0.0233< / >
1.9925< / >
0.0031< / >
0.0349< / >
2.3877< / >
0.0040< / >
151.5465< / >
尼日利亚奈拉< / >
1344.9600< / >
2.4500< / >
-15.6100< / >
1505.6166< / >
2.4074< / >
-10.6722< / >
1804.3209< / >
3.1525< / >
2.1521< / >
挪威克朗< / >
9.2983< / >
0.0154< / >
-0.0335< / >
10.4090< / >
0.0150< / >
0.0092< / >
13.4142< / >
0.0198< / >
106.522< / >
波兰兹罗提< / >
1.4062< / >
-< / >
-0.1093< / >
208.6679< / >
-0.0691< / >
1.2171< / >
371.1064< / >
-0.0276< / >
0.0278< / >
秘鲁新索尔< / >
3.4652< / >
0.0075< / >
0.0174< / >
3.8176< / >
0.0076< / >
0.0358< / >
4.6487< / >
0.0097< / >
-0.4649< / >
菲律宾比索< / >
63.4600< / >
-0.2750< / >
-0.7250< / >
71.0403< / >
-0.3238< / >
-0.4906< / >
85.1347< / >
-0.3753< / >
0.9178< / >
俄罗斯卢布< / >
3.3594< / >
-0.0085< / >
-0.0055< / >
4.1410< / >
-0.0088< / >
0.0152< / >
21.0850< / >
-0.0378< / >
-0.8173< / >
罗马尼亚列伊< / >
4.7726< / >
0.0052< / >
-0.0282< / >
3.3472< / >
0.0046< / >
-0.0076< / >
4.6227< / >
0.0064< / >
0.4769< / >
俄罗斯卢布< / >
81.5500< / >
0.4250< / >
4< / >
91.2192< / >
0.4555< / >
1.5222< / >
109.4035< / >
0.5621< / >
|
FTSE行业指数:领涨与落后
< rowspan="2">11月03日< / >
| 美元< / >
| 欧元< / >
| 英镑< / >
沙特里亚尔< / >
3.7534< / >
0.0004< / >
-0.0002< / >
4.2017< / >
-0.0004< / >
0.0186< / >
5.0534< / >
0.0002< / >
0.0382< / >
新加坡元< / >
1.2810< / >
0.0020< / >
1.4340< / >
0.0019< / >
0.0068< / >
1.7185< / >
0.0025< / >
0.0135< / >
|
Rand | 16.5950< / > 0.0113< / > -0.0025< / > 18.5773< / > 0.0085< / > 0.0082< / > 22.2630< / > 0.0135< / > 0.1668< / > |
韩元< / > 1340.9500< / > -2.6300< / > 17.5000< / > 1501.1365< / > -3.3024< / > 26.2076< / > 1789.9015< / > -3.6895< / > 37.0424< / > 0.0014< / >< / >
瑞典克朗< / > 9.7867< / > 0.0017< / > -0.1317< / > 10.9670< / > -0.0035< / > -0.1033< / > 13.1428< / > 0.0014< / > -0.0814< / > 0.0014< / >< / >
瑞士法郎< / > 0.8308< / > 0.0011< / > -0.0078< / > 0.9189< / > -0.0010< / > -0.0047< / > 1.1012< / > 0.0014< / > -0.0020< / > 0.0014< / >< / >
台湾元< / > 32.8450< / > 0.1930< / > 0.3880< / > 36.7683< / > 0.2079< / > 0.5754< / > 44.0632< / > 0.2557< / > 0.8279< / >< / >
泰铢< / > 33.7500< / > -0.0145< / > -0.0125< / > 37.7814< / > -0.0246< / > 0.1549< / > 45.2773< / > -0.0229< / > 0.3292< / >< / >
突尼斯第纳尔< / > 2.9971< / > -0.0075< / > -0.0115< / > 3.3552< / > -0.0091< / > 0.0042< / > 4.0208< / > -0.0104< / > 0.0124< / >< / >
土耳其里拉< / > 49.9973< / > 0.0265< / > 0.2100< / > 55.9695< / > 0.0172< / > 0.4941< / > 67.0738< / > 0.0305< / > 0.7921< / >< / >
阿联酋迪拉姆< / > 3.6730< / > 0.0003< / > —< / > 4.1118< / > -0.0005< / > 0.0184< / > 4.9276< / > —< / > 0.0376< / >< / >
英镑< / > 0.1454< / > 0.0001< / > -0.0057< / > 0.8345< / > -0.0001< / > 0.0027< / > 1.0000< / > —< / >< / >
美元< / > 1.8000< / > —< / > 1.1195< / > -0.0002< / > 0.0050< / > 1.3416< / > -0.0001< / > 0.0103< / >< / >
越南盾< / > 2576.0000< / > -10.0000< / > -68.0000< / > 28843.7490< / > -17.6390< / > 53.0470< / > 34566.3780< / > 15.9930< / > 173.5730< / > —< / >< / >
欧元< / > 0.8933< / > 0.0002< / > -0.0040< / > 1.0000< / > —< / > 1.1984< / > —< / > 0.0001< / > 0.0038< / > 0.0010< / >< / >
|
年内百分比变化
科技硬件与设备< / > 73.56< / >< / >
医疗保健提供商< / > 39.83< / >< / >
石油、天然气与煤炭< / > 39.18< / >< / >
能源< / > 39.14< / >< / >
非寿险< / > 35.81< / >< / >
可再生能源< / > 28.30< / >< / >
工业运输< / > 24.59< / >< / >
化学品< / > 21.67< / >< / >
建筑与材料< / > 17.10< / >< / >
电信社会服务提供商< / > 16.52< / >< / >
电信< / > 16.52< / >< / >
电力< / > 15.19< / >< / >
一般工业< / > 14.47< / >< / >
饮料< / > 14.46< / >< / >
工业金属与采矿< / > 12.54< / >< / >
电子与电气设备< / > 12.43< / >< / >
航空航天与国防< / > 11.39< / >< / >
零售商< / > 10.53< / >< / >
公共事业< / > 9.92< / >< / >
|
73.56 |
基本材料< / >
|
89.83< / >
工业< / >
< / >
89.18< / >
气体、水及多元公用事业< / >
< / >
99.14< / >
封闭式基金< / >
55.81< / >
旅游与休闲< / >
26.30< / >
生物科技< / >
24.59< / >
食品生产商< / >
21.67< / >
房地产信托(REITs)< / >
17.10< / >
消费必需品< / >
16.92< / >
消费服务< / >
16.92< / >
房地产< / >
15.19< / >
烟草< / >
14.47< / >
金融与信贷服务< / >
14.46< / >
媒体< / >
12.54< / >
工业工程与设备< / >
12.43< / >
房地产投资与证券< / >
11.38< / >
个人护理、药品与杂货< / >
10.53< / >
消费非必需品< / >
9.92< / >
工业支持服务< / >
|
FTSE 全球指数
英国近期权益发行
Nov 02地区与国家< / >
股票数量< / >
US$ / 指数< / >
日变化%< / >
月变化%< / >
年内变化%< / >
UTS$ / 总回报< / >
年内总回报%< / >
股息收益率%< / >
| FTSE 全球行业< / >
全球< / >
10208< / >
1225.46< / >
-0.18< / >
-2.28< / >
9.42< / >
2121.55< / >
11.03< / >
1.66< / >
全球大盘< / >
1742< / >
1142.63< / >
-0.41< / >
-3.62< / >
9.58< / >
2035.51< / >
10.12< / >
1.56< / >
全球美国< / >
2458< / >
1434.04< / >
-0.40< / >
2.61< / >
13.42< / >
2354.54< / >
11.31< / >
1.97< / >
全球小盘< / >
6008< / >
1397.04< / >
0.51< / >
-0.67< / >
8.18< / >
2117.50< / >
10.49< / >
1.85< / >
全球非欧元区< / >
9602< / >
1302.21< / >
-0.30< / >
-2.37< / >
9.99< / >
2196.77< / >
11.52< / >
1.57< / >
全球非中国< / >
7955< / >
1446.83< / >
-0.22< / >
-2.21< / >
10.38< / >
6877.85< / >
12.00< / >
1.64< / >
全球非美国< / >
8666< / >
786.30< / >
0.29< / >
-2.41< / >
6.12< / >
1569.62< / >
10.66< / >
2.58< / >
全球非英国< / >
9886< / >
1298.64< / >
-0.24< / >
-2.48< / >
9.46< / >
2200.05< / >
11.03< / >
1.61< / >
全球非日本< / >
8860< / >
1281.33< / >
0.15< / >
-2.13< / >
9.18< / >
2235.19< / >
10.75< / >
1.63< / >
| FTSE 区域行业< / >
美洲< / >
1984< / >
1714.50< / >
-0.40< / >
-2.04< / >
10.17< / >
2672.59< / >
11.27< / >
1.21< / >
亚太< / >
8425< / >
869.09< / >
-0.15< / >
-1.66< / >
11.60< / >
1569.11< / >
13.84< / >
2.25< / >
亚太非日本< / >
5077< / >
1082.09< / >
0.33< / >
-6.71< / >
10.79< / >
2162.80< / >
12.97< / >
2.30< / >
欧洲< / >
1432< / >
687.38< / >
0.74< / >
2.07< / >
4.74< / >
1480.18< / >
7.66< / >
2.86< / >
|
UK | 1211< / > 788.68< / > 0.81< / > 1.39< / > 3.73< / > 1642.01< / > 6.62< / > 2.80< / > |
欧元区< / > 606< / > 697.44< / > 1.01< / > -1.07< / > 2.32< / > 1489.10< / > 5.09< / > 2.82< / >< / >
亚洲< / > 402< / > 703.30< / > -0.92< / > -5.03< / > -0.34< / > 1569.18< / > 3.58< / > 4.85< / >< / >
| FTSE发达行业< / >< / >
发达国家< / > 5366< / > 1278.17< / > -2.08< / > -1.93< / > 10.23< / > 2186.64< / > 11.78< / > 1.57< / >< / >
发达国家(不含北美)< / > 3607< / > 745.47< / > 0.19< / > -1.80< / > 10.22< / > 1508.91< / > 13.00< / > 2.66< / >< / >
Nov 02 板块< / > 股票数量< / > US$ / 指数< / > 日变化%< / > 月变化%< / > 年内变化%< / > UTS$ / 总回报< / > 年内总回报%< / > 股息收益率< / >< / >
|
公司名称
Petra Diamonds Ltd
Pennon Group PLC
| 数字信息服务< / >< / >
软件与计算机服务< / > 526< / > 3377.68< / > -1.53< / > -8.36< / > -5.92< / > 4112.94< / > -5.46< / > 0.59< / >< / >
媒体< / > 153< / > 785.21< / > 1.05< / > 4.22< / > -13.75< / > 1130.17< / > -13.07< / > 1.08< / >< / >
| 科技< / >< / >
半导体< / > 298< / > 809.12< / > -2.14< / > -16.52< / > 29.71< / > 886.39< / > 30.30< / > 0.63< / >< / >
科技硬件与设备< / > 765< / > 6367.07< / > -10.08< / > -14.29< / > 31.41< / > 9031.65< / > 32.03< / > 0.61< / >< / >
工业< / > 1291< / > 4572.05< / > -1.87< / > -12.10< / > 14.01< / > 6006.81< / > 14.56< / > 0.60< / >< / >
生物科技< / > 216< / > 125.43< / > -1.27< / > 2.01< / > 18.23< / > 128.12< / > 18.61< / > 0.28< / >< / >
电信设备< / > 111< / > 498.35< / > -1.20< / > -14.85< / > 49.06< / > 581.96< / > 51.64< / > 1.77< / >< / >
电信< / > 256< / > 486.57< / > -0.44< / > -10.25< / > 20.19< / > 1234.84< / > 23.27< / > 1.00< / >< / >
电信服务提供商< / > 145< / > 418.24< / > 0.53< / > -3.73< / > -4.65< / > 939.54< / > -1.33< / > 3.78< / >< / >
电子与电气设备< / > 359< / > 1912.02< / > 0.11< / > -11.27< / > 12.03< / > 2760.91< / > 13.08< / > 1.04< / >< / >
| 金融< / >< / >
金融与信贷服务< / > 111< / > 903.74< / > 1.08< / > 10.69< / > -8.80< / > 1418.71< / > -7.56< / > 1.46< / >< / >
金融< / > 1160< / > 701.73< / > 0.72< / > 1.65< / > 6.19< / > 1469.71< / > 9.06< / > 2.86< / >< / >
人寿保险< / > 71< / > 659.85< / > 0.24< / > 3.25< / > 10.96< / > 1384.97< / > 14.60< / > 3.35< / >< / >
银行< / > 497< / > 503.86< / > 0.31< / > -1.73< / > 8.01< / > 1179.29< / > 11.38< / > 3.50< / >
[⚠ 低质量翻译,建议复核] 配股:10股换17股,每股16.5便士(xr 07.11.25),于11月21日全额支付。
配股:7股换15股,每股250便士(xr 12.10.26),于10月26日全额支付。
数据由ICE提供,[www.ice.com](http: / www.ice.com)
所列价格为参考,并相信在出版时为准确。ICE或《金融时报》不作出任何报价。ICE或《金融时报》不保证或担保信息的准确性或完整性。ICE或《金融时报》不承担任何责任,也不将对依赖或使用信息造成的任何损失负责。如需进一步信息,请联系newspapers@ice.com
FTSE 100 概要
16. | 金融< / > 9.87< / > 2.24< / > |
9.13< / > 消费数字服务< / > 1.30< / >< / >
8.12< / > 科技< / > 1.20< / >< / >
7.56< / > 金融(不含投资公司)< / > 1.10< / >< / >
6.51< / > 软件与计算机服务< / > 1.03< / >< / >
6.48< / > 银行< / > 0.76< / >< / >
5.79< / > (空缺)< / > < / >< / >
5.62< / > 寿险< / > 0.76< / >< / >
5.63< / > 制药与生物科技< / > -1.33< / >< / >
5.37< / > 医疗保健< / > -1.45< / >< / >
4.77< / > 个人用品< / > -2.99< / >< / >
4.27< / > 投行与经纪< / > -4.31< / >< / >
3.75< / > 医疗设备与服务< / > -6.53< / >< / >
3.46< / > 休闲用品< / > -16.92< / >< / >
3.22< / > 持股
商品与家居作物 | -17.84< / > | 2.94< / > 贵金属与采矿< / > -17.87< / > |
Nov 02地区与国家< / > 股票数量< / > 美国股票总值< / > 美元日变化< / > 月变化< / > 年内涨跌%< / > 年内总回报< / > 美元总回报< / > 年内总回报< / > 股息收益率< / >< / >
加拿大以外的发达国家< / > 5149< / > 1282.51< / > -0.27< / > -2.09< / > 10.21< / > 2188.43< / > 11.75< / > 1.55< / > < / >< / >
欧洲以外的发达国家< / > 4153< / > 1486.10< / > -0.42< / > -2.62< / > 11.28< / > 2378.86< / > 12.56< / > 1.33< / > < / >< / >
欧元区以外的发达国家< / > 4760< / > 1372.84< / > -0.35< / > -2.00< / > 10.97< / > 2278.48< / > 12.41< / > 1.46< / > < / >< / >
美国以外的发达国家< / > 3824< / > 778.13< / > 0.22< / > -1.31< / > 10.29< / > 1563.52< / > 12.99< / > 2.59< / > < / >< / >
英国以外的发达国家< / > 5146< / > 1383.92< / > -0.28< / > -2.14< / > 10.31< / > 2278.50< / > 11.71< / > 1.51< / > < / >< / >
日本以外的发达国家< / > 4018< / > 1348.08< / > -0.19< / > -1.73< / > 10.02< / > 2322.21< / > 11.52< / > 1.53< / > < / >< / >
亚太地区(不含日本)< / > 2301< / > 806.88< / > 0.50< / > -6.39< / > 18.55< / > 1458.91< / > 21.14< / > 2.41< / > < / >< / >
亚太地区(不含日本)< / > 953< / > 1043.39< / > 0.34< / > -8.50< / > 25.56< / > 2306.16< / > 28.69< / > 2.74< / > < / >< / >
欧洲(发达国家)< / > 1213< / > 705.37< / > 0.74< / > 2.17< / > 4.77< / > 1520.17< / > 7.68< / > 1.86< / > < / >< / >
英国以外的欧洲< / > 991< / > 101.16< / > 0.18< / > 1.50< / > 3.74< / > 1706.64< / > 8.44< / > 2.14< / > < / >< / >
欧元区< / > 606< / > 692.83< / > 1.00< / > -1.07< / > 2.11< / > 1479.17< / > 4.88< / > 2.82< / > < / >< / >
欧洲与亚太地区< / > 3514< / > 747.50< / > 0.20< / > -1.74< / > 10.24< / > 1479.17< / > 4.88< / > 2.82< / > < / >< / >
| 《金融时报》新兴市场指数< / >< / >
新兴市场< / > 4842< / > 1016.22< / > 0.44< / > 5.44< / > 2.31< / > 1979.80< / > 4.47< / > 2.56< / > < / >< / >
亚太新兴市场< / > 4124< / > 1144.36< / > 0.32< / > 5.08< / > 3.38< / > 2096.64< / > 5.21< / > 2.04< / > < / >< / >
新兴欧洲< / > 220< / > 300.10< / > 0.97< / > -6.63< / > -2.93< / > 883.31< / > -0.41< / > 3.18< / > < / >< / >
新兴加韩< / > 5264< / > 3991.28< / > 0.64< / > -7.75< / > 9.49< / > 7367.08< / > 11.67< / > 2.40< / > < / >< / >
韩国与波兰< / > 2703< / > 4509.39< / > 0.47< / > -8.39< / > 29.44< / > 8565.47< / > 11.67< / > 2.40< / > < / >< / >
先进新兴市场< / > 1196< / > 1417.35< / > 0.43< / > -8.61< / > 30.08< / > 3090.92< / > 32.94< / > 2.63< / > < / >< / >
次级新兴市场< / > 3646< / > 935.69< / > 1.26< / > -2.26< / > -15.36< / > 1661.14< / > -13.62< / > 2.50< / > < / >< / >
|
英国公司业绩
公司 |
营业额(£)< / >
|
英国食品集团(Associated British Foods)< / >
期末 19.6亿(19.5亿)< / >
< / >
阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)< / >
第三季度 16.2亿美元(15.2亿美元)< / >
< / >
BlackRock欧洲投资信托(BlackRock Greater Europe Inv Tst)< / >
期末 -(-)< / >
英国石油(BP)< / >
第三季度 69.9亿(49.3亿)< / >
dotDigital集团(dotDigital Group)< / >
期末 90.9百万(83.9百万)< / >
Focusrite< / >
国际 90.3百万(88.0百万)< / >
Gattaca< / >
期末 4.433 亿(3.989 亿)< / >
国际生物技术信托(International Biotechnology Tst)< / >
期末 -(-)< / >
Pacisco< / >
壳牌(Shell)< / >
第三季度 92.8亿美元(68.2亿美元)< / >
|
11月2日行业< / >
股票数量< / >
美元指数< / >
日变化%< / >
月变化%< / >
年内变化%< / >
美元总REIT< / >
年内REIT%< / >
股息收益率%< / >
家居用品与家庭消费品< / >
119< / >
536.73< / >
3.27< / >
5.60< / >
-0.03< / >
925.85< / >
1.79< / >
2.13< / >
烟草< / >
13< / >
1504.28< / >
-0.25< / >
12.78< / >
21.92< / >
4807.66< / >
26.15< / >
4.18< / >
| 医疗保健< / >
医疗保健< / >
841< / >
1260.75< / >
-0.39< / >
9.53< / >
13.64< / >
1997.83< / >
15.36< / >
1.49< / >
医疗保健服务提供商< / >
114< / >
1863.19< / >
-1.25< / >
6.71< / >
14.35< / >
2334.74< / >
15.81< / >
1.49< / >
医疗与生物科技< / >
531< / >
1121.28< / >
-0.65< / >
10.23< / >
19.79< / >
1955.47< / >
21.89< / >
1.67< / >
医疗设备与远程医疗< / >
196< / >
1779.18< / >
0.87< / >
8.73< / >
-2.02< / >
2184.77< / >
-1.14< / >
0.94< / >
| 农业食品与饮料< / >
食品生产商< / >
300< / >
651.43< / >
0.85< / >
8.07< / >
3.45< / >
1172.73< / >
6.47< / >
3.06< / >
饮料< / >
103< / >
919.92< / >
2.19< / >
11.82< / >
16.17< / >
1658.47< / >
18.83< / >
2.67< / >
| 能源< / >
能源< / >
376< / >
736.04< / >
-2.74< / >
5.80< / >
37.57< / >
1600.45< / >
41.05< / >
2.86< / >
电力< / >
252< / >
664.51< / >
0.44< / >
5.54< / >
2.49< / >
1568.14< / >
4.81< / >
2.87< / >
可替代能源< / >
90< / >
92.85< / >
0.85< / >
-2.85< / >
0.45< / >
116.00< / >
2.65< / >
3.63< / >
多元化能源< / >
69< / >
342.24< / >
-0.40< / >
-8.55< / >
-8.00< / >
146.00< / >
-7.78< / >
0.44< / >
石油、天然气与煤炭< / >
307< / >
770.15< / >
-2.99< / >
6.53< / >
40.52< / >
1744.01< / >
44.28< / >
2.97< / >
天然气、水与多元化公共事业< / >
119< / >
723.65< / >
0.28< / >
6.87< / >
6.47< / >
1831.16< / >
9.52< / >
3.48< / >
公共事业< / >
412< / >
701.74< / >
0.47< / >
6.51< / >
4.11< / >
1681.60< / >
6.57< / >
2.91< / >
| 运输< / >
汽车零部件< / >
299< / >
1078.10< / >
1.03< / >
4.25< / >
-11.33< / >
1777.51< / >
-10.10< / >
1.51< / >
工业运输< / >
383< / >
1422.93< / >
1.22< / >
4.16< / >
13.57< / >
2491.08< / >
15.86< / >
2.29< / >
| 工业< / >
航空航天与国防< / >
105< / >
2792.22< / >
2.07< / >
1.21< / >
-1.54< / >
4271.58< / >
-0.76< / >
0.96< / >
工程 / 347 / 2111.35 / 0.34 / -10.94 / 8.15 / 3359.86 / 9.76 / 1.59
工业材料 / 93 / 272.61 / 0.89 / -0.48 / -2.00 / 543.35 / 0.22 / 2.92
工业金属与采矿 / 388 / 979.31 / 0.58 / -8.02 / 7.77 / 1960.36 / 9.93 / 2.54
工业支持服务 / 232 / 1398.50 / 1.64 / 13.42 / 8.82 / 2056.68 / 10.17 / 1.21
工业 / 2097 / 1532.82 / 1.25 / 0.10 / 6.93 / 2455.22 / 8.33 / 1.46
一般工业 / 202 / 925.81 / 1.05 / -1.98 / 13.19 / 1665.30 / 14.86 / 1.65
| 资源与材料 | 基础材料 / 1036 / 975.03 / 0.90 / -4.60 / 6.36 / 1819.03 / 8.38 / 2.28
化学品 / 457 / 1088.73 / 0.62 / 2.82 / 17.71 / 1960.49 / 19.99 / 2.08
建筑与材料 / 469 / 1368.16 / 1.86 / 0.12 / 3.25 / 2677.39 / -1.77 / 1.11
废物与处理服务 / 41 / 449.64 / 1.46 / 13.47 / 9.25 / 4975.19 / 10.46 / 1.19
珍贵金属与采矿 / 98 / 1292.45 / 1.99 / -9.70 / -9.04 / 2301.91 / -7.60 / 2.02
收盘价(p) / 涨跌幅(%)
---
3i集团 / 2562.00 / 1.34
阿伯丁集团 / 223.80 / -0.44
阿德米拉尔 / 3872.00 / -0.26
艾尔特尔非洲 / 263.60 / -1.42
阿联威坦 / 1349.00 / -0.66
安格洛美国 / 3717.00 / -2.80
安托法加斯塔 / 3138.00 / -3.54
英国联合食品 / 1900.00 / -2.21
阿斯利康 / 13760.00 / -0.72
奥托特劳德集团 / 544.60 / -0.33
阿维瓦 / 729.40 / -0.11
巴博克国际 / 1047.50 / 1.55
BAE系统 / 2075.00 / 0.10
巴尔福·比蒂 / 873.00 / -0.23
巴克莱 / 419.55 / -1.05
巴内特·雷德罗 / 319.00 / -4.66
英国石油 / 589.30 / -1.78
英国美孚烟草 / 4529.00 / -0.98
英国地产 / 431.00 / -1.28
BT集团 / 222.90 / -2.11
班兹尔 / 2864.00 / -0.97
伯柏利 / 1063.00 / -0.23
森特里卡 / 150.25 / 0.23
可口可乐欧洲 / 8390.00 / -2.10
可口可乐HBC AG / 4766.00 / -0.87
康帕斯 / 2497.11 / -2.86
康普塔森特 / 5045.00 / 1.10
康瓦泰克 / 243.60 / -0.89
国际 | 3636.00< / > -0.87< / > |
DCC能源< / > 6455.00< / > -0.08< / >< / >
迪吉奥< / > 1763.00< / > -2.35< / >< / >
外交学院< / > 7220.00< / > -0.62< / >< / >
易捷航空< / > 679.80< / > —< / >< / >
安达维尔矿业< / > 3557.00< / > -4.74< / >< / >
爱德思< / > 3013.00< / > -0.33< / >< / >
F&C投资信托< / > 336.60< / > -0.47< / >< / >
弗雷斯尼略< / > 2206.00< / > -2.18< / >< / >
游戏作品< / > 15790.00< / > -0.82< / >< / >
格伦科尔< / > 504.30< / > -2.83< / >< / >
葛兰素史克< / > 1827.50< / > 0.16< / >< / >
海伦< / > 325.80< / > 0.74< / >< / >
哈尔玛< / > 3476.00< / > -0.60< / >< / >
希斯考克斯< / > 1939.00< / > 2.97< / >< / >
豪登木工< / > 825.00< / > -1.20< / >< / >
汇丰控股< / > 1258.00< / > -1.98< / >< / >
ICG< / > 1912.00< / > 0.42< / >< / >
IG集团< / > 952.50< / > -0.21< / >< / >
IMI< / > 2890.00< / > -0.34< / >< / >
帝国烟草< / > 2937.00< / > -1.41< / >< / >
英福玛< / > 835.00< / > -1.46< / >< / >
|
< / > 收盘价(p)< / > 涨跌幅(%Chg)< / >< / >
洲际酒店集团< / > 12690.50< / > -0.66< / >< / >
国际消费航空< / > 417.30< / > -0.14< / >< / >
英特森克集团< / > 5035.00< / > -0.08< / >< / >
投资银行< / > 605.00< / > -0.25< / >< / >
伊萨卡能源< / > 281.00< / > -1.33< / >< / >
JD运动时尚< / > 94.36< / > -2.03< / >< / >
金丝雀< / > 362.80< / > -1.04< / >< / >
土地信托< / > 675.00< / > -1.32< / >< / >
法律与一般< / > 306.20< / > 0.16< / >< / >
狮子金融< / > 12110.00< / > 0.50< / >< / >
劳埃德大集团< / > 93.70< / > -1.60< / >< / >
伦敦度量产业< / > 186.10< / > -0.80< / >< / >
伦敦证券交易所< / > 9454.00< / > -0.73< / >< / >
M&G< / > 323.10< / > 0.09< / >< / >
马克斯与儿子< / > 414.20< / > -0.20< / >< / >
梅洛斯工业< / > 473.40< / > -0.50< / >< / >
梅特伦能源< / > 3973.63< / > 0.07< / >< / >
国家电网< / > 1240.50< / > -0.92< / >< / >
国家西部银行集团< / > 580.00< / > -2.06< / >< / >
Next< / > 15095.00< / > -2.08< / >< / >
皮尔逊< / > 1285.50< / > -0.62< / >< / >
波斯汀广场持股< / > 3872.00< / > -0.62< / >< / >
极地技术< / > 583.50< / > -1.77< / >< / >
普鲁登保险< / > 944.20< / > 1.18< / >< / >
瑞克特·本克塞< / > 5510.00< / > -1.15< / >< / >
RELX< / > 2952.00< / > -1.53< / >< / >
伦托基尔初级< / > 354.30< / > -0.73< / >< / >
力拓< / > 6078.00< / > -1.00< / >< / >
罗尔斯·罗伊斯< / > 1260.60< / > -1.22< / >< / >
塞恩斯伯里< / > 345.40< / > -1.46< / >< / >
苏格兰房地产投资测试< / > 1499.50< / > -0.89< / >< / >
塞格罗< / > 909.00< / > -0.63< / >< / >
塞文特伦特< / > 3260.00< / > -1.45< / >< / >
壳牌< / > 3863.50< / > -1.47< / >< / >
史密斯·尼普< / > 1117.50< / > 1.13< / >< / >
史密斯集团< / > 2709.00< / > -0.99< / >< / >
斯普拉克斯集团< / > 7470.00< / > -1.71< / >< / >
SSE< / > 2581.00< / > -0.81< / >< / >
标准银行< / > 2053.00< / > -0.10< / >< / >
标准人寿< / > 929.50< / > -0.27< / >< / >
圣詹姆斯地产< / > 1081.00< / > -0.55< / >< / >
特易购< / > 538.60< / > -1.17< / >< / >
Diploma< / > 7220.00< / > -0.62< / >< / >
easyJet< / > 679.80< / > —< / >< / >
Endeavour Mining< / > 3557.00< / > -4.74< / >< / >
Experian< / > 3013.00< / > -0.33< / >< / >
Informa< / > 835.00< / > -1.46< / >< / >
Intl Cons Airlines< / > 417.30< / > -0.14< / >< / >
Intersink Group< / > 5035.00< / > -0.08< / >< / >
Investec< / > 605.00< / > -0.25< / >< / >
Ithaca Energy< / > 281.00< / > -1.33< / >< / >
JD Sports Fashion< / > 94.36< / > -2.03< / >< / >
Kingfisher< / > 362.80< / > -1.04< / >< / >
Land Securities< / > 675.00< / > -1.32< / >< / >
Legal & General< / > 306.20< / > 0.16< / >< / >
Lion Finance< / > 12110.00< / > 0.50< / >< / >
Lloyds Big Gp< / > 93.70< / > -1.60< / >< / >
LondonMetric Prop< / > 186.10< / > -0.80< / >< / >
Lon Stock Ex< / > 9454.00< / > -0.73< / >< / >
Marks & Sons< / > 414.20< / > -0.20< / >< / >
Melrose Ind< / > 473.40< / > -0.50< / >< / >
Metlen Energy< / > 3973.63< / > 0.07< / >< / >
Natl Grid< / > 1240.50< / > -0.92< / >< / >
NatWest Group< / > 580.00< / > -2.06< / >< / >
Howden Joinery< / > 825.00< / > -1.20< / >< / >
Polar CapTech< / > 583.50< / > -1.77< / >< / >
Rentokil Initial< / > 354.30< / > -0.73< / >< / >
Scot Mort Inv Tst< / > 1499.50< / > -0.89< / >< / >
Segro< / > 909.00< / > -0.63< / >< / >
Severn Trent< / > 3260.00< / > -1.45< / >< / >
Standard Chartered< / > 2053.00< / > -0.10< / >< / >
Standard Life< / > 929.50< / > -0.27< / >< / >
St James's Place< / > 1081.00< / > -0.55< / >< / >
Gp | 1159.00< / > 1.70< / > | Tritax Big Box< / > 147.70< / > 0.54< / >< / > Unilever< / > 4857.00< / > 0.90< / >< / > United Utilities< / > 1517.00< / > 1.56< / >< / > Vodafone< / > 117.20< / > 0.30< / >< / > Weir< / > 2630.00< / > 1.28< / >< / > Whitbread< / > 2780.00< / > 1.00< / >< / > WPP< / > 413.20< / > -1.27< / >< / >
英国近期新增股票
< / > 收盘价(p)< / > 涨跌幅(%Chg)< / > < / > 收盘价(p)< / > 涨跌幅(%Chg)< / >< / >
1947 Oil & Gas< / > 9.28< / > 1.01< / > Meanitime Resources< / > 985.00< / > 1.03< / >< / >
Abenoejar Tungsten< / > 100.00< / > 0.00< / > Mendell Helium< / > 3.14< / > 4.85< / >< / >
Aimia< / > 141.00< / > 0.00< / > Meridian Mining< / > 86.80< / > 2.69< / >< / >
Brawara Solutions< / > 164.50< / > 0.00< / > Rift Helium< / > 6.25< / > 6.01< / >< / >
Chaleit Holdings< / > 69.00< / > 0.00< / > Roundhouse AI< / > 6.13< / > 2.00< / >< / >
Coastal Africa Group< / > 225.00< / > 0.00< / > Serval Resources< / > 23.50< / > 2.17< / >< / >
Dauchl Corp< / > 342.00< / > 5.00< / > Sunbelt Rentals< / > 6168.00< / > 2.41< / >< / >
EDX Medical Group< / > 7.00< / > 3.45< / > Tapir Holdings< / > 43.50< / > 0.00< / >< / >
Halo Minerals< / > 6.88< / > 5.17< / > TEKA Group< / > 330.00< / > 0.00< / >< / >
iForex Financial< / > 142.50< / > 0.00< / > The Smarter Web Co< / > 40.00< / > 3.80< / >< / >
|
英国(美元)
《金融时报》全球500强:世界最大公司
< rowspan="2">股票< / > | 52周< / >< / >
价格< / > 涨跌幅< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 市盈率< / > 市值(亿英镑)< / >< / >
| 澳大利亚(AUD)< / >< / >
ANZ集团< / > 40.56< / > -0.25< / > 41.33< / > 33.36< / > 5.36< / > 20.83< / > 122.33< / >< / >
BHP集团< / > 56.74< / > -0.82< / > 68.77< / > 40.17< / > 4.26< / > 29.31< / > 288.48< / >< / >
澳大利亚联邦银行< / > 165.05< / > -1.67< / > 185.59< / > 146.98< / > 3.05< / > 25.29< / > 276.20< / >< / >
CSL有限公司< / > 201.16< / > 0.43< / > 202.12< / > 90.00< / > 2.02< / > 31.28< / > 96.53< / >< / >
麦格理集团< / > 251.33< / > -1.11< / > 267.90< / > 187.31< / > 3.20< / > 25.67< / > 96.42< / >< / >
澳大利亚国家银行< / > 40.91< / > -0.60< / > 49.45< / > 35.48< / > 4.16< / > 18.51< / > 127.54< / >< / >
西法玛斯< / > 77.12< / > 0.43< / > 93.25< / > 70.80< / > 2.88< / > 30.43< / > 87.55< / >< / >
西太平洋银行< / > 37.19< / > 0.37< / > 43.32< / > 33.46< / > 4.14< / > 18.66< / > 127.20< / >< / >
| 比利时(EUR)< / >< / >
Atneuscher busch Indev< / > 74.00< / > 2.04< / > 76.30< / > 51.60< / > 1.32< / > 27.92< / > 132.99< / >< / >
| 巴西(BRL)< / >< / >
伊塔乌银行控股< / > 43.06< / > 0.00< / > 55.43< / > 34.77< / > 0.00< / > 241.90< / >< / >
伊塔乌银行控股优先股< / > 38.69< / > 0.00< / > 50.85< / > 37.35< / > 0.00< / > 209.28< / >< / >
巴西石油公司< / > 60.01< / > 0.00< / > 66.49< / > 30.99< / > 0.00< / > 53.19< / > 446.61< / >< / >
巴西石油公司优先股< / > 52.71< / > 0.00< / > 59.79< / > 29.53< / > 0.00< / > 287.09< / >< / >
瓦尔帕拉索矿业< / > 62.02< / > 0.00< / > 91.62< / > 59.42< / > 0.00< / > 69.88< / > 263.94< / >< / >
|
Stock |
< rowspan="2">Price< / >
| 52 Week< / >
|
+ / -Chg< / >
High< / >
Low< / >
Yld< / >
P / E< / >
< / >
| Finland (EUR)< / >
< / >
Nordex Bank Abp< / >
15.79< / >
0.13< / >
18.11< / >
14.15< / >
0.00< / >
11.36< / >
| France (EUR)< / >
Air Liquide< / >
182.04< / >
1.14< / >
189.80< / >
154.86< / >
1.85< / >
34.89< / >
Aarhus< / >
196.08< / >
3.68< / >
221.30< / >
157.42< / >
1.63< / >
36.58< / >
AAA< / >
42.97< / >
0.37< / >
45.66< / >
36.55< / >
5.40< / >
11.97< / >
BNP Paribas A< / >
87.04< / >
1.39< / >
113.82< / >
65.12< / >
6.66< / >
9.10< / >
Compagnie de Safran< / >
70.40< / >
2.52< / >
91.30< / >
63.52< / >
3.27< / >
10.51< / >
Crédit Agricole< / >
14.94< / >
-0.05< / >
20.40< / >
14.69< / >
0.00< / >
6.85< / >
Doverne< / >
66.06< / >
0.54< / >
60.14< / >
57.26< / >
3.41< / >
25.51< / >
Dassault Systèmes< / >
25.62< / >
0.36< / >
25.59< / >
15.82< / >
1.65< / >
28.47< / >
ENSE< / >
23.46< / >
0.03< / >
20.88< / >
20.26< / >
4.26< / >
15.43< / >
EssilorLuxottica< / >
166.90< / >
2.60< / >
323.80< / >
138.30< / >
2.14< / >
35.94< / >
Hermès International< / >
1320.50< / >
27.00< / >
2300.00< / >
1229.00< / >
1.36< / >
30.06< / >
L'Oréal< / >
436.50< / >
-0.45< / >
442.35< / >
338.85< / >
1.65< / >
34.34< / >
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton< / >
383.65< / >
6.65< / >
654.70< / >
375.65< / >
3.30< / >
18.01< / >
Safran< / >
288.20< / >
12.50< / >
366.50< / >
262.60< / >
1.16< / >
37.92< / >
Sofina< / >
80.63< / >
0.89< / >
90.79< / >
69.75< / >
5.11< / >
10.30< / >
Schneider Electric< / >
240.45< / >
2.95< / >
312.30< / >
220.40< / >
1.75< / >
27.99< / >
TotalEnergies< / >
83.61< / >
-1.82< / >
85.94< / >
52.48< / >
12.13< / >
Vinci< / >
110.30< / >
1.70< / >
143.15< / >
104.25< / >
4.58< / >
12.75< / >
|
Argo Resources< / >
238.41< / >
7.62< / >
349.84< / >
188.48< / >
1.05< / >
20.34< / >
121.46< / >
Alimentation Couche-Tard< / >
82.14< / >
1.16< / >
95.15< / >
68.30< / >
1.05< / >
28.23< / >
75.40< / >
Bank of Montreal< / >
242.03< / >
2.81< / >
259.20< / >
168.92< / >
2.83< / >
27.53< / >
168.16< / >
Bank of Nova Scotia< / >
131.61< / >
0.56< / >
134.50< / >
91.28< / >
3.46< / >
27.08< / >
162.07< / >
Brookfield Asset Management< / >
57.95< / >
3.08< / >
68.44< / >
50.76< / >
0.67< / >
103.48< / >
129.36< / >
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners< / >
71.96< / >
4.49< / >
77.99< / >
58.09< / >
3.90< / >
41.12< / >
114.94< / >
[...OMITTED...]< / >
|
Bank | 163.60< / > 0.65< / > 172.87< / > 114.80< / > 2.62< / > 21.84< / > 148.54< / > |
加拿大国家铁路< / > 177.35< / > 4.54< / > 185.25< / > 126.05< / > 2.06< / > 31.22< / > 107.14< / >< / >
加拿大自然能源< / > 75.12< / > -3.30< / > 78.60< / > 41.67< / > 3.33< / > 18.32< / > 154.86< / >< / >
加拿大太平洋铁路< / > 127.90< / > 2.57< / > 133.38< / > 96.50< / > 0.81< / > 40.35< / > 111.22< / >< / >
Constellation Software< / > 3447.02< / > 53.63< / > 3170.98< / > 2198.00< / > 0.16< / > 1160.51< / > 73.05< / >< / >
Enbridge< / > 68.62< / > -0.29< / > 80.65< / > 62.42< / > 5.64< / > 36.03< / > 156.07< / >< / >
FleetBoston Financial< / > 62.38< / > -0.39< / > 63.28< / > 47.88< / > 1.38< / > 26.08< / > 137.38< / >< / >
皇家荷兰壳牌< / > 286.21< / > 2.23< / > 306.38< / > 201.76< / > 2.46< / > 26.00< / > 397.77< / >< / >
Shopify Inc.< / > 217.64< / > -2.73< / > 255.95< / > 129.01< / > 0.00< / > 146.07< / > 263.03< / >< / >
森科能源< / > 105.50< / > -5.61< / > 112.80< / > 54.55< / > 2.27< / > 27.55< / > 123.40< / >< / >
TC Energy< / > 89.05< / > -1.11< / > 100.18< / > 69.41< / > 3.94< / > 35.62< / > 89.05< / >< / >
加拿大皇家银行< / > 175.00< / > 0.96< / > 178.95< / > 112.26< / > 2.51< / > 21.19< / > 295.66< / >< / >
废物连接< / > 263.33< / > 6.49< / > 263.12< / > 203.46< / > 0.82< / > 59.04< / > 65.88< / >< / > | 德国(欧元)< / >< / >
adidas AG< / > 172.85< / > 4.30< / > 188.80< / > 129.95< / > 1.62< / > 23.17< / >< / >
安联< / > 440.40< / > 1.70< / > 454.60< / > 338.80< / > 3.88< / > 15.39< / >< / >
巴斯夫< / > 53.55< / > 0.09< / > 55.05< / > 41.48< / > 2.20< / > 29.42< / >< / >
宝马< / > 58.86< / > 1.06< / > 97.92< / > 51.98< / > 7.48< / > 4.95< / >< / >
德国银行< / > 30.59< / > 0.51< / > 35.84< / > 23.82< / > 3.27< / > 9.68< / >< / >
德国证券交易所< / > 313.60< / > -6.90< / > 321.50< / > 200.10< / > 1.34< / > 47.59< / >< / >
德国电信< / > 25.84< / > -0.25< / > 34.36< / > 23.57< / > 3.83< / > 13.12< / >< / >
DHL集团< / > 59.20< / > -0.05< / > 59.08< / > 37.35< / > 3.71< / > 19.16< / >< / >
7< / > 52.00< / > 1.44< / > 88.83< / > 31.27< / > 0.67< / > 67.53< / >< / >
奔驰汽车集团< / > 41.16< / > 0.47< / > 62.34< / > 38.89< / > 8.50< / > 4.04< / >< / >
默克< / > 150.00< / > -1.30< / > 152.10< / > 100.70< / > 1.47< / > 23.47< / >< / >
慕尼黑再保险< / > 568.00< / > 1.00< / > 572.60< / > 437.40< / > 4.23< / > 27.13< / >< / >
保时捷< / > 46.41< / > -0.31< / > 50.66< / > 35.62< / > 2.18< / > 11.75< / >< / >
莱茵金属< / > 1000.00< / > -37.60< / > 1966.00< / > 900.20< / > 1.15< / > 60.57< / >< / >
SAP< / > 210.50< / > -0.75< / > 231.05< / > 127.50< / > 1.19< / > 34.28< / >< / >
西门子< / > 270.35< / > 4.70< / > 291.70< / > 198.00< / > 1.98< / > 25.67< / >< / >
西门子能源< / > 130.00< / > 3.08< / > 191.66< / > 100.30< / > 0.54< / > 206.35< / >< / >
Healthineers | 43.40< / > 0.51< / > 49.25< / > 32.81< / > 2.30< / > 22.72< / > |
大众汽车(Volkswagen)< / > 69.80< / > 0.65< / > 110.20< / > 66.05< / > 7.45< / > 5.25< / >< / >
大众汽车私人股份(Volkswagen Privat)< / > 70.24< / > 0.62< / > 109.15< / > 65.92< / > 7.49< / > 5.29< / >< / >
|
科威特金融公司(Kuwait Finance House)< / > 0.74< / > -0.01< / > 0.85< / > 0.73< / > 3.23< / > 22.34< / > 14.71< / >< / >
| 墨西哥(MXN)< / >< / >
美国移动B(America Movil B)< / > 23.05< / > < / > 24.49< / > 17.48< / > 2.34< / > 0.00< / > 1433.36< / >< / >
沃尔玛墨西哥(Wai Mart de Mexico)< / > 50.39< / > < / > 63.97< / > 44.90< / > 2.30< / > 0.00< / > 879.12< / >< / >
| 荷兰(欧元,EUR)< / >< / >
Adyen< / > 851.20< / > 24.30< / > 1530.00< / > 772.40< / > 0.00< / > 46.74< / > 26.98< / >< / >
ASML Holding< / > 1408.00< / > -4.80< / > 1741.00< / > 822.20< / > 0.57< / > 70.72< / > 546.51< / >< / >
海因肯(Heineken)< / > 81.48< / > 1.92< / > 80.44< / > 63.90< / > 2.36< / > 17.48< / > 46.07< / >< / >
ING集团(ING Groep)< / > 28.14< / > -0.12< / > 32.40< / > 20.98< / > 4.04< / > 14.21< / > 80.84< / >< / >
Prosus N< / > 35.19< / > 0.90< / > 63.94< / > 33.32< / > 0.80< / > 6.65< / > 76.94< / >< / >
Magnum冰淇淋公司(The Magnum Ice Cream Co)< / > 18.02< / > 0.32< / > 18.12< / > 11.02< / > 0.00< / > 37.55< / > 11.04< / >< / >
环球音乐集团(Universal Music Group NV)< / > 17.11< / > 0.03< / > 23.70< / > 13.92< / > 3.04< / > 39.79< / > 31.46< / >< / >
| 挪威(挪威克朗,NOK)< / >< / >
|
< rowspan="2">股票< / > | 52周< / >< / >
价格< / > 涨跌< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 市盈率< / >< / >
新日铁化学(Shin-Etsu Chemical)< / > 5821.00< / > -45.00< / > 7930.00< / > 4366.00< / > 2.30< / > 23.43< / >< / >
软银(SoftBank)< / > 234.90< / > 0.70< / > 252.90< / > 202.80< / > 3.75< / > 20.70< / >< / >
软银集团(SoftBank Group)< / > 4410.00< / > -71.00< / > 27375.00< / > 3365.00< / > 0.25< / > 5.05< / >< / >
索尼金融集团(Sony Financial Group)< / > 143.80< / > 0.60< / > 180.40< / > 129.30< / > 5.56< / > 18.07< / >< / >
索尼集团(Sony Group)< / > 3966.00< / > 8.00< / > 4776.00< / > 3643.00< / > 0.88< / > 72.50< / >< / >
三菱UFJ金融(Sumitomo Mitsui Financial)< / > 3155.00< / > -75.00< / > 7260.00< / > 2999.00< / > 2.85< / > 15.32< / >< / >
武田制药(Takeda Pharmaceutical)< / > 6647.00< / > 4.00< / > 6712.00< / > 4102.00< / > 3.07< / > 68.70< / >< / >
东京海上保险(Tokio Marine Holdings)< / > 575.60< / > -3.80< / > 8468.00< / > 501.00< / > 2.84< / > 30.91< / >< / >
东京电子(Tokyo Electron)< / > 10005.00< / > 491.00< / > 81260.00< / > 8860.00< / > 1.91< / > 39.87< / >< / >
丰田汽车(Toyota Motor)< / > 3051.00< / > -19.00< / > 4000.00< / > 2686.00< / > 3.28< / > 10.33< / >< / >
科威特(科威特第纳尔,KWD)< / > < / >< / >
Equinor |
427.90< / >
-19.60< / >
454.60< / >
226.40< / >
3.34< / >
220.57< / >
1023.00< / > | 韩国(KRW)< / >
< / >
LG能源解决方案< / >
356000.00< / >
-3500.00< / >
497500.00< / >
206500.00< / >
0.00< / >
77.64< / >
83304.00< / >
< / >
三星生物< / >
1422000.00< / >
-85000.00< / >
1987000.00< / >
1150000.00< / >
0.00< / >
59.43< / >
65825.73< / >
三星电子< / >
229000.00< / >
4000.00< / >
374500.00< / >
94500.00< / >
0.74< / >
34.67< / >
三星电子优先股< / >
177000.00< / >
2900.00< / >
243500.00< / >
71000.00< / >
0.95< / >
167.36< / >
142019.70< / >
三星精密< / >
312000.00< / >
2500.00< / >
773000.00< / >
297500.00< / >
247.03< / >
7763.51< / >
SK海力士< / >
1472000.00< / >
54000.00< / >
2987000.00< / >
501000.00< / >
0.86< / >
23.73< / >
|
中国农业银行A股< / >
7.47< / >
-0.01< / >
8.68< / >
5.79< / >
3.48< / >
9.56< / >
23.85< / >
中国银行A股< / >
7.04< / >
-0.05< / >
7.25< / >
5.23< / >
3.35< / >
9.51< / >
16.80< / >
中国交通银行A股< / >
8.57< / >
-0.06< / >
8.63< / >
5.37< / >
3.93< / >
9.94< / >
496.25< / >
中国建设银行A股< / >
12.06< / >
0.08< / >
12.13< / >
8.52< / >
3.35< / >
9.28< / >
255.47< / >
中国人寿保险A股< / >
35.00< / >
0.40< / >
51.92< / >
32.32< / >
2.79< / >
6.42< / >
728.82< / >
中国商业银行A股< / >
43.18< / >
-0.37< / >
43.79< / >
35.28< / >
4.67< / >
7.58< / >
890.76< / >
中国石化A股< / >
5.90< / >
< / >
8.11< / >
4.43< / >
3.68< / >
22.52< / >
572.53< / >
中国神华能源A股< / >
51.84< / >
-0.15< / >
51.99< / >
38.73< / >
3.61< / >
19.49< / >
949.29< / >
中国长江电力A股< / >
29.50< / >
-0.24< / >
30.00< / >
25.38< / >
3.39< / >
20.92< / >
721.81< / >
奥泰证券A股< / >
25.56< / >
1.26< / >
30.25< / >
23.77< / >
3.27< / >
13.04< / >
311.84< / >
康美华腾科技A股< / >
240.19< / >
7.27< / >
468.75< / >
216.51< / >
1.49< / >
14.88< / >
1058.99< / >
东方财富信息A股< / >
18.71< / >
1.11< / >
25.87< / >
17.18< / >
0.53< / >
24.46< / >
296.03< / >
法斯卡里奥特印度国际A股< / >
44.39< / >
-0.61< / >
84.95< / >
42.99< / >
2.21< / >
24.94< / >
880.88< / >
IDC A股< / >
8.69< / >
-0.06< / >
8.83< / >
6.85< / >
3.68< / >
8.69< / >
2.34< / >
工商银行A股< / >
19.60< / >
-0.05< / >
21.30< / >
16.44< / >
5.44< / >
5.66< / >
414.79< / >
江苏恒鹏加纳A股< / >
7.04< / >
-0.03< / >
8.63< / >
6.07< / >
3.52< / >
10.37< / >
100.00< / >
连邦金融集团A股< / >
1439.11< / >
47.05< / >
1568.00< / >
1151.01< / >
3.61< / >
21.92< / >
1798.99< / >
陆家嘴精密仪器A股< / >
45.27< / >
-0.33< / >
81.78< / >
43.56< / >
< / >
19.77< / >
332.61< / >
A | 87.66< / > -1.52< / > 89.50< / > 71.77< / > 4.91< / > 15.11< / > 610.34< / > |
PetroChina A< / > 14.02< / > 0.18< / > 13.88< / > 8.59< / > 3.64< / > 16.30< / > < / >< / >
Ping An Insurance Group A< / > 53.12< / > 0.32< / > 74.88< / > 46.90< / > 5.14< / > 6.92< / > 566.26< / >< / >
Postal Savings Bank China A< / > 5.72< / > -0.01< / > 5.97< / > 4.76< / > 3.99< / > 7.64< / > < / >< / >
Shenzhen Mind Bio-Med A< / > 179.29< / > -2.46< / > 216.89< / > 130.66< / > 2.34< / > 26.70< / > 217.26< / >< / >
Wuling Yen A< / > 74.25< / > -0.45< / > 122.50< / > 68.68< / > 6.95< / > 32.19< / > 288.21< / >< / >
Zijin Mining Group A< / > 26.84< / > -0.76< / > 44.94< / > 24.42< / > 2.98< / > 13.76< / > 552.95< / >< / >
|
BioNTech Hong Kong (HKD)< / > 87.53< / > -0.64< / > 124.00< / > 79.52< / > 0.00< / > 41.88< / > 22.13< / >< / >
AIA Group< / > 75.40< / > < / > 92.15< / > 68.00< / > 2.63< / > 127.58< / > 780.14< / >< / >
HKEX< / > 372.80< / > 5.40< / > 444.80< / > 360.00< / > 3.74< / > 26.53< / > 472.65< / >< / > | Saudi Arabia (SAN)< / >< / >
ACWA Power< / > 151.50< / > -3.60< / > 249.50< / > 145.10< / > 0.30< / > 61.34< / > 116.12< / >< / >
Al Rajhi Bank< / > 60.15< / > 0.40< / > 109.90< / > 58.55< / > 5.00< / > 15.42< / > 360.90< / >< / >
Saudi Arabian Mining< / > 55.65< / > -0.70< / > 79.90< / > 53.15< / > 0.00< / > 29.14< / > 216.41< / >< / >
Saudi Arabian Oil< / > 26.10< / > 0.18< / > 27.96< / > 23.29< / > 5.20< / > 18.12< / > 63.16< / >< / >
Saudi Basic Industries< / > 47.00< / > -0.08< / > 62.50< / > 43.36< / > 5.53< / > 5.47< / > 141.00< / >< / >
Saudi National Bank< / > 36.50< / > 0.60< / > 45.24< / > 34.34< / > 6.30< / > 9.03< / > 219.00< / >< / >
STC Co< / > 41.50< / > 0.34< / > 45.10< / > 40.36< / > 5.30< / > 13.97< / > 207.50< / >< / >
| India (UNIV)< / >< / >
Bajra Finance< / > 956.15< / > 18.95< / > 1177.60< / > 788.40< / > 0.63< / > 50.29< / > 5985.40< / >< / >
Brah Amrit Ltd< / > 1988.40< / > 16.40< / > 2174.70< / > 1726.05< / > 1.21< / > 151.75< / > 12398.13< / >< / >
HCL Technologies< / > 1430.00< / > 2.00< / > 1770.00< / > 1030.00< / > 4.20< / > 22.29< / > 3880.54< / >< / >
HECIC Bank< / > 699.50< / > 7.20< / > 1017.90< / > 668.90< / > 1.86< / > 14.13< / > 10379.70< / >< / >
Hindustan Unilever< / > 1896.15< / > 32.15< / > 2487.75< / > 1758.60< / > 2.16< / > 43.35< / > 4455.18< / >< / >
ICICI Bank< / > 1385.25< / > -8.75< / > 1479.90< / > 1187.55< / > 0.87< / > 21.92< / > 3947.45< / >< / >
Infosys< / > 1163.00< / > -19.00< / > 1727.85< / > 980.30< / > 4.39< / > 18.03< / > 47178.78< / >< / >
Lithia Inc.< / > 286.00< / > -4.00< / > 426.50< / > 252.80< / > 5.45< / > 9.57< / > 3333.49< / >< / >
Lithia Minderika Bank< / > 459.00< / > 3.00< / > 435.00< / > 345.00< / > 0.14< / > 17.61< / > 12635.25< / >< / >
Larsen & Toubro< / > 2935.00< / > 77.00< / > 4440.00< / > 3288.65< / > 0.97< / > 33.65< / > 5414.15< / >< / >
Life Insurance Corporation< / > 388.30< / > 4.30< / > 936.60< / > 377.10< / > 2.58< / > 13.65< / > 4911.99< / >< / >
< / >< / >
印度 | 11660.00< / > 247.00< / > 17371.60< / > 10984.90< / > 1.20< / > 24.97< / > 3665.93< / > |
印度塔塔集团< / > 1299.00< / > 135.45< / > 1611.20< / > 1152.30< / > 0.46< / > 25.24< / > 15758.77< / >< / >
印度国家银行< / > 887.00< / > 26.00< / > 1234.80< / > 930.25< / > 1.76< / > 11.36< / > 9110.77< / >< / >
孙兴医药< / > 1768.00< / > -10.25< / > 2047.55< / > 1586.60< / > 0.90< / > 38.77< / > 4241.92< / >< / >
塔塔咨询服务< / > 2495.10< / > -0.90< / > 3336.70< / > 1976.00< / > 2.65< / > 18.59< / > 9037.49< / >< / > | 新加坡(新元 SGD)< / >< / >
DBS集团控股< / > 71.71< / > -1.42< / > 79.05< / > 52.85< / > 4.43< / > 18.67< / > 203.94< / >< / >
华侨银行< / > 28.32< / > -0.97< / > 32.57< / > 16.75< / > 3.71< / > 1737.42< / > 127.87< / >< / >
华侨永远银行< / > 40.66< / > -0.71< / > 45.15< / > 33.25< / > 3.91< / > 14.73< / > 67.56< / >< / >
| 新加坡(美元 USD)< / >< / >
JOYY A< / > 79.33< / > -0.99< / > 85.15< / > 54.24< / > 6.78< / > 317.32< / > 51.80< / >< / >
海洋集团 / 新加坡 A< / > 75.48< / > 1.24< / > 159.80< / > 71.53< / > 0.00< / > 28.48< / > 41.25< / >< / >
| 南非(兰特 ZAR)< / >< / >
|
中国农业银行< / > H-75< / > -0.20< / > 6.98< / > 5.08< / > 4.48< / > 8.65< / > 207.33< / >< / >
阿里巴巴集团< / > 99.45< / > 2.40< / > 174.20< / > 88.65< / > 1.04< / > 119.82< / > 1979.25< / >< / >
中国银行< / > 5.86< / > -0.28< / > 6.29< / > 4.30< / > 4.75< / > 7.92< / > 490.03< / >< / >
交通银行< / > 8.52< / > -0.08< / > 8.70< / > 6.35< / > 4.66< / > 7.89< / > 298.30< / >< / >
BPO H< / > 70.45< / > 2.20< / > 113.40< / > 67.00< / > 0.58< / > 19.68< / > 259.50< / >< / >
中信银行< / > 8.16< / > -0.53< / > 8.76< / > 6.50< / > 5.61< / > 6.80< / > 121.51< / >< / >
中国建设银行< / > 10.14< / > -0.12< / > 10.30< / > 7.37< / > 4.70< / > 7.80< / > 24.38< / >< / >
中国人寿保险< / > 24.80< / > 0.92< / > 36.16< / > 22.24< / > 4.54< / > 4.55< / > 184.54< / >< / >
中国商业银行< / > 53.00< / > -1.55< / > 54.80< / > 43.34< / > 4.29< / > 9.30< / > 243.32< / >< / >
中国石化< / > 4.89< / > 0.03< / > 5.70< / > 3.98< / > 5.13< / > 18.68< / > 115.89< / >< / >
神华能源< / > 42.70< / > 0.14< / > 49.62< / > 38.20< / > 5.44< / > 15.65< / > 144.22< / >< / >
中信证券< / > 21.02< / > 1.14< / > 30.82< / > 19.37< / > 4.70< / > 10.72< / > 71.97< / >< / >
H | 7.78< / > -0.12< / > 7.92< / > 5.96< / > 4.78< / > 7.78< / > 674.82< / > |
JD.com A< / > 101.60< / > 1.20< / > 132.50< / > 95.80< / > 3.86< / > 14.75< / > 253.65< / >< / >
Meituan B< / > 73.05< / > 1.45< / > 108.00< / > 63.65< / > 0.00< / > 19.02< / > 408.81< / >< / >
Middle Group H< / > 97.50< / > 0.85< / > 101.70< / > 77.65< / > 5.08< / > 16.81< / > 63.46< / >< / >
NetEase< / > 177.50< / > 0.80< / > 232.60< / > 168.80< / > 2.59< / > 16.76< / > 570.14< / >< / >
Norgo Spring H< / > 43.46< / > 1.12< / > 56.25< / > 37.90< / > 2.60< / > 30.80< / > 218.81< / >< / >
PetrolChina H< / > 10.81< / > -0.01< / > 12.22< / > 7.86< / > 5.44< / > 12.57< / > 228.08< / >< / >
Ping An Insurance Group H< / > 50.30< / > 0.56< / > 74.70< / > 47.68< / > 6.25< / > 6.55< / > 374.61< / >< / >
Prestar Savings Bank China< / > 5.43< / > -0.18< / > 5.78< / > 4.48< / > 4.96< / > 7.45< / > 107.92< / >< / >
Tencent Holdings< / > 392.20< / > 8.60< / > 662.00< / > 375.20< / > 1.35< / > 15.85< / > 3566.14< / >< / >
Xiaomi Corp B< / > 28.10< / > 1.62< / > 45.08< / > 21.30< / > 0.00< / > 17.35< / > 600.41< / >< / >
Zijin Mining Group H< / > 27.24< / > -0.62< / > 46.99< / > 26.58< / > 3.38< / > 13.97< / > 163.14< / >< / >
Zijin (USD)< / > < / >< / >
Full Truck Alliance< / > 6.72< / > 0.35< / > 13.14< / > 7.46< / > 2.65< / > 290.67< / > 162.63< / >< / >
Fidis Holdings A< / > 103.15< / > 4.70< / > 202.53< / > 80.50< / > 2.47< / > 9.87< / > 79.01< / >< / >
Hindi Holdings B< / > 81.69< / > 3.07< / > 139.12< / > 71.94< / > 0.00< / > 32.67< / > 465.01< / >< / >
|
Bank Central Asia< / > 4980.00< / > < / > 8700.00< / > 4740.00< / > 0.00< / > 10.66< / > 6139.10< / >< / >
PT Bantis Renewables< / > 2070.00< / > 275.00< / > 10725.00< / > 1730.00< / > 0.20< / > 0.00< / > 769.37< / >< / >
| Italy (EUR)< / >< / >
Assicurazioni Generali< / > 42.93< / > 0.46< / > 46.24< / > 32.06< / > 3.82< / > 17.67< / > 65.88< / >< / >
Enel< / > 9.34< / > 0.02< / > 10.31< / > 8.58< / > 5.25< / > 25.23< / > 92.77< / >< / >
Eni< / > 26.52< / > -0.62< / > 27.76< / > 15.55< / > 4.15< / > 18.80< / > 80.29< / >< / >
Ferrari< / > 358.95< / > 3.85< / > 377.50< / > 269.00< / > 0.83< / > 51.95< / > 63.63< / >< / >
Intesa Sampaolo< / > 5.95< / > 0.06< / > 6.94< / > 4.81< / > 6.32< / > 25.88< / > 103.18< / >< / >
Stellantis< / > 4.24< / > 0.10< / > 10.49< / > 3.50< / > 0.00< / > 5.70< / > 12.28< / >< / >
UniCredit SpA< / > 74.40< / > 1.35< / > 86.42< / > 57.36< / > 4.23< / > 14.57< / > 116.19< / >< / > | Japan (JPY)< / >< / >
Canon< / > 4927.00< / > -72.00< / > 5303.00< / > 3967.00< / > 2.42< / > 16.11< / > 6221.34< / >< / >
Omega Pharmaceutical< / > 6943.00< / > 21.00< / > 10700.00< / > 5974.00< / > 1.93< / > 25.95< / > 11485.79< / >< / >
Daichi Sankyo< / > 2382.50< / > 138.50< / > 3945.00< / > 2390.00< / > 3.48< / > 19.13< / > 5388.42< / >< / >
FAST REITING< / > 7530.00< / > 20.00< / > 6660.00< / > 6260.00< / > 1.19< / > 42.92< / > 23981.13< / >< / >
Hitachi< / > 4591.00< / > 15.00< / > 4591.00< / > 3520.00< / > 1.00< / > 27.13< / > 12545.47< / >< / >
Honda< / > [...OMITTED...]< / > [......]< / >< / >
线粒体重型 | 17708.64< / > -50.00< / > 5380.00< / > 3390.00< / > 0.86< / > 34.02< / > 11435.98< / > |
线粒体美国Fd Grp< / > 3383.00< / > -64.00< / > 3813.00< / > 2238.00< / > 2.84< / > 15.67< / > 40148.47< / >< / >
日本A & B< / > 451.00< / > -1.00< / > 451.00< / > 348.00< / > 1.25< / > 16.95< / > 10488.58< / >< / >
三菱金融集团< / > 7567.00< / > -162.00< / > 8963.00< / > 6149.00< / > 1.98< / > 15.09< / > 18340.90< / >< / >
任天堂< / > 8149.00< / > -140.00< / > 14630.00< / > 6544.00< / > 1.99< / > 22.36< / > 10489.88< / >< / >
NTT< / > 174.50< / > 1.20< / > 181.90< / > 142.60< / > 1.20< / > 13.84< / > 15601.03< / >< / >
Recruit Holdings< / > 17319.00< / > -1230.00< / > 19560.00< / > 6040.00< / > 0.14< / > 51.38< / > 26480.90< / >< / >
|
纳斯达克N< / > 695.05< / > 16.45< / > 1289.52< / > 60.56< / > 0.73< / > 82.38< / > 517.77< / >< / >
| 西班牙(欧元区)< / >< / >
桑坦德银行< / > 10.39< / > 0.27< / > 13.12< / > 8.62< / > 1.97< / > 11.41< / > 151.18< / >< / >
BBVA银行< / > 21.58< / > 0.52< / > 25.57< / > 17.10< / > 3.64< / > 83.00< / > 118.92< / >< / >
卡伊萨银行< / > 11.46< / > 0.26< / > 13.55< / > 8.83< / > 3.65< / > 33.69< / > 79.91< / >< / >
伊比利亚电力< / > 22.25< / > 0.07< / > 22.29< / > 17.39< / > 2.56< / > 40.31< / > 148.48< / >< / >
NxtEx< / > 57.50< / > 1.36< / > 59.42< / > 46.07< / > 2.47< / > 130.38< / > 179.21< / >< / >
| 瑞典(瑞典克朗)< / >< / >
阿特拉斯·科普柯A< / > 187.15< / > 3.25< / > 214.10< / > 149.45< / > 1.60< / > 34.47< / > 628.37< / >< / >
阿特拉斯·科普柯B< / > 162.80< / > 2.40< / > 186.50< / > 134.00< / > 1.84< / > 29.98< / > 254.11< / >< / >
FST< / > 319.00< / > 10.00< / > 383.00< / > 256.00< / > 1.57< / > 515.25< / > 416.92< / >< / >
Investor B< / > 428.20< / > 1.10< / > 429.80< / > 306.70< / > 1.31< / > 6.33< / > 780.15< / >< / >
沃尔沃B< / > 309.00< / > -1.00< / > 374.50< / > 255.00< / > 4.21< / > 18.24< / > 492.33< / >< / >
| 瑞士(瑞士法郎)< / >< / >
ABB< / > 71.34< / > 0.66< / > 89.14< / > 53.78< / > 1.32< / > 27.54< / > 130.06< / >< / >
阿尔康< / > 60.42< / > 1.32< / > 68.34< / > 47.80< / > 0.46< / > 58.10< / > 30.19< / >< / >
富国金融< / > 166.95< / > 1.15< / > 202.20< / > 127.20< / > 1.98< / > 35.60< / > 89.75< / >< / >
格拉维登< / > 4000.00< / > 27.00< / > 4015.00< / > 2566.00< / > 1.80< / > 44.93< / > 36.93< / >< / >
霍尔西姆< / > 71.10< / > 2.14< / > 82.54< / > 60.10< / > 2.39< / > 22.08< / > 40.30< / >< / >
Group |
648.20< / >
4.00< / >
650.00< / >
454.60< / >
0.77< / >
72.59< / >
45.52< / >
|
Nestlé< / >
84.64< / >
-0.06< / >
87.09< / >
70.29< / >
3.66< / >
24.11< / >
218.08< / >
< / >
Mershey< / >
131.52< / >
-2.26< / >
135.06< / >
98.61< / >
2.81< / >
43.12< / >
267.62< / >
< / >
Roche Holding< / >
406.60< / >
-4.60< / >
415.60< / >
270.80< / >
1.71< / >
25.13< / >
43.38< / >
Roche Holding Pref< / >
397.20< / >
-6.20< / >
405.90< / >
291.00< / >
2.47< / >
24.55< / >
279.06< / >
Sika< / >
184.75< / >
5.65< / >
197.60< / >
120.35< / >
2.00< / >
28.42< / >
29.65< / >
Swiss Re< / >
153.65< / >
0.30< / >
154.75< / >
114.05< / >
4.10< / >
11.77< / >
45.90< / >
UBS< / >
39.79< / >
0.55< / >
45.04< / >
28.25< / >
2.15< / >
20.30< / >
130.42< / >
Zurich Insurance Group< / >
823.60< / >
-2.00< / >
630.00< / >
521.00< / >
4.81< / >
19.50< / >
94.30< / > | United Arab Emirates (AED)< / >< / >
Hon Hai Precision< / >
251.00< / >
5.50< / >
314.00< / >
187.50< / >
2.86< / >
18.44< / >
3533.01< / >
MediaTek< / >
3970.00< / >
55.00< / >
5480.00< / >
1130.00< / >
1.23< / >
60.01< / >
6371.66< / >
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg< / >
2330.00< / >
-40.00< / >
2590.00< / >
1375.00< / >
1.12< / >
| 35.1660422.42< / > | United Kingdom (GBP)< / >< / >
3i Group Plc< / >
25.62< / >
0.34< / >
44.03< / >
18.25< / >
3.30< / >
4.75< / >
26.15< / >
AstraZeneca< / >
137.60< / >
-1.00< / >
157.32< / >
98.92< / >
1.74< / >
27.97< / >
213.43< / >
BAE Systems< / >
20.75< / >
0.02< / >
23.60< / >
15.29< / >
1.82< / >
30.16< / >
62.23< / >
Barclays< / >
4.20< / >
-0.05< / >
5.54< / >
3.61< / >
2.74< / >
9.58< / >
55.83< / >
BP< / >
5.89< / >
-0.11< / >
6.39< / >
4.13< / >
4.34< / >
< / >
92.56< / >
British American Tobacco< / >
45.29< / >
-0.45< / >
53.26< / >
37.44< / >
5.41< / >
12.90< / >
97.59< / >
Compass Group< / >
24.97< / >
-0.74< / >
25.96< / >
20.00< / >
2.03< / >
30.43< / >
42.46< / >
Diageo< / >
17.63< / >
-0.42< / >
19.04< / >
12.96< / >
2.11< / >
30.28< / >
39.27< / >
Experian< / >
30.13< / >
-0.10< / >
36.16< / >
22.03< / >
1.72< / >
24.57< / >
26.49< / >
Glencore< / >
5.04< / >
-0.15< / >
7.07< / >
3.32< / >
2.51< / >
< / >
59.10< / >
GSX< / >
18.27< / >
0.03< / >
22.82< / >
16.90< / >
3.83< / >
12.95< / >
73.93< / >
Haleon< / >
3.26< / >
0.02< / >
4.34< / >
3.10< / >
2.24< / >
17.51< / >
28.63< / >
HSBC Holdings< / >
12.58< / >
-0.25< / >
16.10< / >
10.28< / >
4.44< / >
13.95< / >
215.55< / >
Lloyds Banking Group< / >
0.94< / >
-0.02< / >
1.23< / >
0.85< / >
4.28< / >
13.39< / >
53.66< / >
London Stock Exchange Group< / >
94.54< / >
-0.70< / >
101.40< / >
66.84< / >
1.67< / >
39.66< / >
45.40< / >
格伦诺尔集团 | 12.40< / > -0.12< / > 14.29< / > 10.96< / > 3.91< / > 18.94< / > 62.36< / > |
国家西部银行集团< / > 5.80< / > -0.12< / > 7.88< / > 5.04< / > 6.03< / > 10.84< / > 45.88< / >< / >
瑞克特·本克塞集团< / > 55.10< / > -0.64< / > 65.23< / > 36.64< / > 3.93< / > 11.77< / > 34.89< / >< / >
RELX集团< / > 29.52< / > -0.46< / > 34.48< / > 19.91< / > 2.33< / > 26.22< / > 51.39< / >< / >
力拓集团< / > 60.78< / > -1.18< / > 91.17< / > 51.59< / > 5.73< / > 13.29< / > 76.30< / >< / >
罗尔斯-罗伊斯控股< / > 12.61< / > -0.16< / > 15.86< / > 9.90< / > 0.87< / > 18.16< / > 104.24< / >< / >
壳牌< / > 38.63< / > -0.57< / > 41.10< / > 25.54< / > 2.98< / > 17.11< / > 220.13< / >< / >
联合利华< / > 48.57< / > -0.44< / > 55.42< / > 36.44< / > 3.29< / > 13.44< / > 104.64< / >< / >
|
商品
| 官方利率< / >< / >
< / > 利率< / > 当前< / > 自< / > 上次< / >< / >
美国< / > 联邦基金利率< / > 3.75-4.00< / > 2026-09-16< / > 3.50-3.75< / >< / >
美国< / > 优惠利率< / > 7.00< / > 2026-09-16< / > 6.75< / >< / >
美国< / > 贴现利率< / > 4.00< / > 2026-09-16< / > 3.75< / >< / >
欧元区< / > 回购利率< / > 2.65< / > 2026-09-16< / > 2.40< / >< / >
英国< / > 回购利率< / > 3.75< / > 2025-12-18< / > 4.00< / >< / >
日本< / > 隔夜拆借利率< / > 1.25< / > 2026-09-18< / > 1.00< / >< / >
瑞士< / > 瑞士国家银行利率< / > 0.00< / > 2025-06-19< / > 0.25< / >< / >
|
美国航空控股(美国,USD)< / > 196.79< / > -9.18< / > 452.70< / > 100.02< / > 0.00< / > 231.52< / > 208.38< / >< / >
3M公司< / > 178.36< / > 4.02< / > 184.90< / > 139.34< / > 1.75< / > 26.46< / > 92.16< / >< / >
阿波特实验室< / > 110.16< / > 1.96< / > 132.03< / > 81.97< / > 2.29< / > 35.54< / > 180.62< / >< / >
阿斯利康< / > 288.84< / > -6.05< / > 298.74< / > 190.75< / > 2.52< / > 81.59< / > 510.41< / >< / >
安永集团< / > 260.94< / > 2.70< / > 291.09< / > 118.15< / > 2.62< / > 19.10< / > 154.15< / >< / >
阿道夫< / > 251.47< / > 1.24< / > 362.71< / > 190.12< / > 0.00< / > 14.03< / > 97.87< / >< / >
美国国际集团< / > 124.59< / > 0.70< / > 130.22< / > 105.48< / > 1.96< / > 13.38< / > 62.46< / >< / >
空气产品与化学品< / > 316.03< / > -0.40< / > 316.64< / > 229.11< / > 2.29< / > 33.30< / > 70.38< / >< / >
爱尔特尔A< / > 171.11< / > 6.72< / > 193.45< / > 110.81< / > 0.00< / > 45.63< / > 71.79< / >< / >
字母公司A< / > 278.99< / > -0.85< / > 408.61< / > 270.70< / > 0.32< / > 14.41< / > 1637.11< / >< / >
字母公司C< / > 278.04< / > -0.18< / > 404.47< / > 271.41< / > 0.32< / > 14.36< / > 1536.73< / >< / >
阿尔蒂拉集团< / > 77.17< / > -0.86< / > 79.81< / > 54.70< / > 5.75< / > 15.91< / > 128.37< / >< / >
亚马逊< / > 245.63< / > 5.28< / > 287.20< / > 196.00< / > 0.00< / > 19.46< / > 2649.44< / >< / >
AMD< / > 466.84< / > -37.96< / > 658.52< / > 188.22< / > 0.00< / > 117.59< / > 762.10< / >< / >
美国电力公司< / > 130.33< / > 0.12< / > 140.58< / > 112.53< / > 2.98< / > 21.05< / > 70.97< / >< / >
美国运通< / > 327.98< / > 8.87< / > 387.49< / > 290.97< / > 1.16< / > 21.28< / > 219.93< / >< / >
国际 | 82.40< / > 0.50< / > 87.29< / > 71.25< / > 2.43< / > 14.90< / > 43.09< / > | 美国塔科际集团< / > 198.30< / > 0.50< / > 200.00< / > 188.00< / > 0.00< / > 14.00< / > 100.00< / >< / > 美国广场< / > 504.31< / > 13.48< / > 572.56< / > 422.37< / > 1.35< / > 11.21< / > 43.78< / >< / > AMETEK公司< / > 241.91< / > 0.79< / > 261.16< / > 188.47< / > 0.56< / > 35.26< / > 55.46< / >< / > 安进公司< / > 465.45< / > -0.56< / > 475.64< / > 288.00< / > 2.17< / > 28.70< / > 251.64< / >< / > 安普亨德A< / > 79.84< / > 0.54< / > 178.52< / > 71.44< / > 0.75< / > 32.99< / > 197.15< / >< / > 模拟器件< / > 412.85< / > -4.26< / > 445.91< / > 223.47< / > 1.07< / > 48.74< / > 200.05< / >< / > Aon集团A< / > 333.38< / > 11.71< / > 382.34< / > 266.33< / > 0.98< / > 18.17< / > 70.73< / >< / > 阿波罗全球管理< / > 119.46< / > 3.62< / > 153.29< / > 99.56< / > 1.88< / > 42.06< / > 70.55< / >< / > 苹果< / > 338.32< / > -6.31< / > 351.73< / > 243.42< / > 0.32< / > 38.62< / > 4937.50< / >< / > 应用材料< / > 374.53< / > -15.56< / > 739.67< / > 203.40< / > 0.57< / > 32.07< / > 297.23< / >< / > 阿普利文A< / > 228.85< / > 0.35< / > 738.01< / > 225.19< / > 0.00< / > 17.52< / > 69.67< / >< / > 阿瑞斯管理< / > 132.96< / > 4.61< / > 181.19< / > 95.80< / > 4.06< / > 60.99< / > 29.78< / >< / > 阿瑞斯塔网络< / > 164.14< / > -4.72< / > 217.41< / > 114.52< / > 0.00< / > 50.99< / > 207.02< / >< / > 亚瑟·J·加拉格尔< / > 278.69< / > 2.82< / > 277.44< / > 160.75< / > 1.00< / > 45.72< / > 71.51< / >< / > AT&T公司< / > 399.20< / > -1.50< / > 432.50< / > 288.00< / > 0.00< / > 24.41< / > 100.00< / >< / > 大洋数据A< / > 187.08< / > -4.64< / > 229.96< / > 56.01< / > 0.00< / > 890.86< / > 29.51< / >< / > 奥托德斯克< / > 257.91< / > 8.30< / > 320.00< / > 185.50< / > 0.00< / > 33.19< / > 53.90< / >< / > 自动数据处理< / > 298.78< / > 4.94< / > 309.40< / > 188.16< / > 2.28< / > 26.42< / > 117.95< / >< / > 奥特森< / > 2523.01< / > 83.19< / > 2996.24< / > 2730.65< / > 0.00< / > 20.84< / > 52.36< / >< / > 贝克休斯A< / > 53.05< / > -2.18< / > 70.41< / > 44.26< / > 1.73< / > 18.11< / > 52.68< / >< / > 纽约梅隆银行< / > 147.78< / > 0.67< / > 165.84< / > 105.42< / > 1.71< / > 16.19< / > 99.44< / >< / > 贝克顿迪克森< / > 198.60< / > 0.72< / > 213.08< / > 140.11< / > 2.11< / > 34.24< / > 54.10< / >< / > 伯克希尔哈撒韦A< / > 26480.73< / > 19047.31< / > 67405.16< / > 888000.00< / > 0.00< / > 93.75< / > 422.08< / >< / > 伯克希尔哈撒韦B< / > 558.11< / > 13.62< / > 550.47< / > 464.01< / > 0.00< / > 21.44< / > 777.91< / >< / > 黑石金融< / > 1167.15< / > 19.61< / > 1187.17< / > 917.39< / > 1.96< / > 27.54< / > 1807.76< / >< / > 黑石集团< / > 120.14< / > 1.63< / > 165.14< / > 101.73< / > 3.10< / > 26.88< / > 91.32< / >< / > 黑利亚A< / > 77.08< / > 0.86< / > 66.92< / > 48.21< / > 0.00< / > 132.90< / > 41.69< / >< / > 波音公司< / > 175.40< / > 3.85< / > 254.35< / > 165.01< / > 0.00< / > 18.08< / > 139.00< / >< / > 预订解决方案A< / > 492.65< / > -1.36< / > 533.50< / > 343.00< / > 0.00< / > 16.89< / > 100.00< / >< / > 预订
持股公司 / 股票名称 / 当前价格 / 涨跌幅 / 52周最高 / 52周最低 / 交易量(百万) / 市盈率 / 市值(亿美元)
------------------------- / ---------- / ------- / ---------- / ---------------- / -------- / ----------------
Holdings / 153.75 / 5.82 / 5520.15 / 146.28 / 1.07 / 16.99 / 115.52
波士顿科学(Boston Scientific) / 44.32 / 2.34 / 105.65 / 39.57 / 0.00 / 17.80 / 64.23
布里斯托迈耶斯·斯夸伊布(Bristol Myers Squibb) / 63.02 / 0.54 / 68.64 / 45.20 / 4.00 / 13.88 / 128.82
博通(Broadcom) / 322.23 / -3.85 / 495.00 / 289.96 / 0.81 / 39.93 / 1538.21
先进设计系统(Cadence Design Systems) / 329.51 / 1.82 / 416.69 / 262.75 / 0.00 / 64.99 / 90.41
资本一金融(Capital One Financial) / 210.77 / 5.92 / 259.63 / 174.24 / 1.52 / 11.61 / 126.78
卡里埃全球(Carrier Global) / 55.17 / 1.54 / 76.76 / 50.24 / 1.74 / 25.08 / 45.14
卡瓦纳A(Cavana A) / 72.00 / 3.71 / 486.89 / 55.91 / 0.00 / 29.88 / 52.04
卡特彼勒(Caterpillar) / 613.62 / -9.13 / 1073.46 / 537.08 / 1.06 / 26.29 / 282.07
CREB集团A(CREB Group A) / 136.75 / 7.90 / 174.27 / 121.44 / 0.00 / 35.24 / 39.41
塞诺科拉(Cencora) / 337.84 / 7.00 / 377.54 / 244.82 / 0.71 / 24.97 / 64.47
查尔斯通信A(Charles Comms A) / 115.54 / 4.05 / 254.11 / 101.11 / 0.00 / 2.97 / 13.24
陈尼尔能源(Cheniere Energy) / 311.67 / -18.65 / 330.73 / 186.20 / 0.80 / 22.14 / 62.64
雪佛龙(Chevron Corp) / 227.38 / -1.55 / 293.36 / 180.65 / 1.55 / 22.74 / 49.47
奇普托莱墨西哥餐厅(Chipotle Mexican Grill) / 32.91 / 1.02 / 41.42 / 27.31 / 0.00 / 30.76 / 41.63
奇宝(Chubb) / 368.98 / 4.86 / 369.00 / 273.35 / 1.11 / 103.36 / 140.98
达美航空(Cintas) / 224.77 / 4.95 / 226.69 / 161.16 / 0.93 / 43.81 / 89.25
西斯科系统(Cisco Systems) / 101.61 / -2.90 / 130.37 / 70.54 / 1.65 / 30.24 / 400.61
花旗集团(Citigroup) / 123.10 / 0.46 / 147.96 / 95.83 / 2.18 / 17.31 / 206.49
云霸(Cloudflare Inc A) / 265.17 / -15.53 / 370.35 / 158.83 / 0.00 / 457.19 / 85.55
CME集团A(CME Group A) / 306.24 / 3.10 / 329.16 / 218.31 / 3.69 / 25.00 / 109.61
认知科技(Cognizant Tech Sci B A) / 65.09 / -0.02 / 87.33 / 37.08 / 2.03 / 11.83 / 29.10
科斯巴全球A(Coinbase Global A) / 137.83 / -5.71 / 361.40 / 136.89 / 0.00 / 49.76 / 30.84
佳洁士(Colgate-Palmolive) / 97.43 / 2.14 / 99.33 / 74.55 / 2.18 / 37.91 / 77.45
科马斯特A(Comcast A) / 23.87 / 0.65 / 32.85 / 20.48 / 5.53 / 7.51 / 84.54
康菲菲利普斯(ConocoPhillips) / 146.84 / -7.19 / 154.28 / 85.57 / 2.29 / 19.42 / 176.40
星座能源(Constellation Energy) / 257.25 / -5.13 / 388.47 / 228.63 / 0.66 / 25.12 / 91.15
星座Srl A(Constellation Srl A) / 31.93 / -0.47 / 34.53 / 23.69 / 0.00 / 24.47 / 42.44
科宁(Corning) / 123.20 / -0.11 / 271.78 / 77.39 / 0.91 / 49.28 / 106.12
科尔维亚(Corteva) / 11.92 / 0.28 / 90.97 / 11.24 / 1.68 / 7.22 / 7.95
批发 | 1040.55< / > 28.27< / > 1096.50< / > 844.06< / > 0.57< / > 50.07< / > 461.10< / > | 优惠券A< / > 14.70< / > 0.33< / > 32.31< / > 13.35< / > 0.00< / > 34.19< / > 24.10< / >< / > CRH< / > 96.59< / > 5.78< / > 131.55< / > 78.62< / > 1.62< / > 19.05< / > 64.25< / >< / > CrowdStrike Holdings A< / > 241.81< / > -8.62< / > 786.00< / > 174.14< / > 0.00< / > 6045.25< / > 247.60< / > |
汇率于英国时间11点固定。
十年期政府债券收益率差异
3.83< / > 0.52< / > -1.13< / >< / > 法国< / > 4.95< / > 1.64< / > -0.01< / > 瑞典< / > 3.03< / > -0.28< / > -1.93< / >< / > 德国< / > 3.31< / > 0.00< / > -1.65< / > 英国< / > 5.26< / > 1.95< / > 0.30< / >< / > 爱尔兰< / > 3.36< / > 0.05< / > -1.60< / > 美国< / > 4.96< / > 1.65< / > 0.00< / > |
所列价格为参考,并相信在出版时准确。ICE或《金融时报》不作出任何报价。本报不保证或担保信息的可靠性或完整性。本报不承担责任,也不将对因依赖或使用信息而产生的任何损失负责。如需进一步信息,请联系newspapers@ice.com


Oil Brent \$ | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Venezuela | IBC | 8468.10 | 8479.81 | Vietnam | Viet Nam Index | 1689.02 | 1710.72 | Cross-Border | Euro Stoxx 50 (Eur) | 6144.95 | 6176.06 | Netherlands | Euronext 100 ID | 1870.83 | 1879.99 | Cross-Border | FTSE Food Global ($) | 20885.40 | 20856.02 | Cross-Border | FTSE All World ($) | 731.92 | 731.91 | Cross-Border | FTSE £300 | 2573.69 | 2589.34 | Cross-Border | FTSE Eurotop 100 | 4942.13 | 4977.12 | Cross-Border | FTSE Global 100 ($) | 5563.13 | 5534.58 | Cross-Border | FTSE Gold Min ($) | 5071.33 | 5071.33 | Cross-Border | FTSE Latibank Top (Eur) | 5542.60 | 5738.60 | Cross-Border | FTSE World ($) | 1370.23 | 1370.61 | Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 100 (Eur) | 7024.23 | 7073.68 | Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 80 ID | 8363.45 | 8403.85 | £ per € |
UK RECENT RIGHTS ISSUES | Nov 02Regions & countries | No ofstocks | US$/indices | Daily%Chg | Monthly%Chg | YTD%Chg | UTS$/Total Ret | YTD%Total Ret | Gr DivYield |
Petra Diamonds Ltd
Pennon Group PLC |
Rights Issue: 7 for 15 at 250p p.s., payable in full Oct. 26 (xr 12.10.26).
Data provided by ICE, www.ice.com
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com
FTSE 100 SUMMARY | 9.87 | Financials | 2.24 | 9.13 | Consumer Digital Services | 1.30 | 8.12 | Technology | 1.20 | 7.56 | Financials ex Inv Co. | 1.10 | 6.51 | Software & Computer Svcs. | 1.03 | 6.48 | Banks | 0.76 | 5.76 | Life Insurance | 0.76 | 5.63 | Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | -1.33 | 5.37 | Health Care | -1.45 | 4.77 | Personal Goods | -2.99 | 4.27 | Investment Banking & Brokerage | -4.31 | 3.75 | Medical Equipment & Svcs | -6.53 | 3.46 | Leisure Goods | -16.92 | 3.23 | Hold Goods & Home Care | -17.84 | 2.94 | Precious Metals & Mining | -17.87 | Nov 02Regions & countries | No ofstocks | USStim stocks | USDSailyChg | MonthlyChg | %YTD% Chg | YTDTotalRet | USSTotal Ret | YTDTotalRet | Gr DivYield | Developed ex Canada | 5149 | 1282.51 | -0.27 | -2.09 | 10.21 | 2188.43 | 11.75 | 1.55 | Developed ex Europe | 4153 | 1486.10 | -0.42 | -2.62 | 11.28 | 2378.86 | 12.56 | 1.33 | Developed ex Eurozone | 4760 | 1372.84 | -0.35 | -2.00 | 10.97 | 2278.48 | 12.41 | 1.46 | Developed ex US | 3824 | 778.13 | 0.22 | -1.31 | 10.29 | 1563.52 | 12.99 | 2.59 | Developed ex UK | 5146 | 1383.92 | -0.28 | -2.14 | 10.31 | 2278.50 | 11.71 | 1.51 | Developed ex Japan | 4018 | 1348.08 | -0.19 | -1.73 | 10.02 | 2322.21 | 11.52 | 1.53 | Developed Ex Asia Pacific ex Japan | 2301 | 806.88 | 0.50 | -6.39 | 18.55 | 1458.91 | 21.14 | 2.41 | Developed Asia Plac ex Jap | 953 | 1043.39 | 0.34 | -8.50 | 25.56 | 2306.16 | 28.69 | 2.74 | Developed Europe | 1213 | 705.37 | 0.74 | 2.17 | 4.77 | 1520.17 | 7.68 | 1.86 | Developed Europe ex UK | 991 | 101.16 | 0.18 | 1.50 | 3.74 | 1706.64 | 8.44 | 2.14 | Developed Eurozone | 606 | 692.83 | 1.00 | -1.07 | 2.11 | 1479.17 | 4.88 | 2.82 | Developed Europe Asia Plac | 3514 | 747.50 | 0.20 | -1.74 | 10.24 | 1479.17 | 4.88 | 2.82 |
FT GLOBAL 500: THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPANIES |
BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS |
查看FTSE网站获取更多详情 [www.ftse.com / products / indices / gilts](http: / www.ftse.com / products / indices / gilts)。
© 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC。所有权利保留。本文中包含的Tradeweb FTSE国债收盘价信息属于Tradeweb专有;不得复制或重新发布;不保证准确、完整或及时;不构成投资建议。Tradeweb不对因使用该信息而导致的任何损失或损害负责。

股票 |
< rowspan="2">价格 / 变动< / >
| 52周< / >
< rowspan="2">市盈率< / >
< rowspan="2">市值(百万美金)< / >
|
最高< / >
最低< / >
收益率< / >
< / >
ONEOK< / >
92.52< / >
-4.55< / >
97.85< / >
87.16< / >
4.63< / >
14.34< / >
< / >
Oracle< / >
119.22< / >
-11.45< / >
285.81< / >
114.50< / >
1.88< / >
18.40< / >
52< / >
O’Reilly Automotive< / >
90.70< / >
2.58< / >
102.45< / >
82.50< / >
8.00< / >
28.70< / >
Old World< / >
78.25< / >
-1.75< / >
94.25< / >
64.25< / >
2.26< / >
22.26< / >
Oneok< / >
163.56< / >
-1.15< / >
167.25< / >
137.62< / >
2.66< / >
14.23< / >
3< / >
PACCAR< / >
102.74< / >
0.83< / >
139.24< / >
93.86< / >
1.36< / >
19.61< / >
Palantir Technologies< / >
178.34< / >
-5.77< / >
212.94< / >
106.37< / >
0.00< / >
140.43< / >
2< / >
Palo Alto Networks< / >
351.72< / >
-14.15< / >
432.32< / >
139.57< / >
0.00< / >
857.85< / >
Parker-Hannifin< / >
928.29< / >
28.47< / >
1099.94< / >
755.10< / >
0.86< / >
32.13< / >
Paychex< / >
115.49< / >
3.37< / >
127.98< / >
85.45< / >
4.12< / >
22.91< / >
PayPal Holdings< / >
58.78< / >
1.77< / >
70.35< / >
38.46< / >
0.95< / >
11.13< / >
PepsiCo< / >
140.42< / >
3.08< / >
171.48< / >
123.47< / >
4.22< / >
17.60< / >
Pfizer< / >
30.67< / >
0.15< / >
30.67< / >
23.62< / >
5.61< / >
39.83< / >
Philip Morris International< / >
208.29< / >
-0.50< / >
214.35< / >
142.11< / >
3.07< / >
30.36< / >
2< / >
Phillips 66< / >
275.04< / >
-7.79< / >
299.39< / >
127.16< / >
1.93< / >
8.78< / >
3< / >
PNC Financial Services Group< / >
231.66< / >
3.80< / >
258.96< / >
177.08< / >
3.45< / >
12.74< / >
Progressive< / >
233.92< / >
2.64< / >
238.38< / >
169.20< / >
0.17< / >
11.71< / >
Prologis Inc< / >
129.65< / >
1.67< / >
153.35< / >
121.40< / >
3.30< / >
28.43< / >
Prudential Financial< / >
118.30< / >
1.85< / >
127.72< / >
91.89< / >
4.73< / >
10.67< / >
Public Storage< / >
333.24< / >
8.47< / >
335.55< / >
256.54< / >
3.60< / >
34.86< / >
QUALCOMM< / >
162.09< / >
-1.09< / >
179.86< / >
127.13< / >
1.00< / >
17.13< / >
Valero Energy< / >
57.58< / >
0.65< / >
67.94< / >
53.15< / >
5.66< / >
42.03< / >
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals< / >
961.26< / >
33.37< / >
935.35< / >
591.52< / >
0.39< / >
20.50< / >
Republic Services< / >
245.97< / >
1.93< / >
249.37< / >
196.41< / >
1.09< / >
34.02< / >
Robinhood Markets Inc< / >
83.84< / >
-1.15< / >
150.47< / >
63.52< / >
37.94< / >
Rubicon A< / >
42.88< / >
-0.11< / >
119.85< / >
33.88< / >
31.30< / >
|
技术 | 479.54< / > 12.94< / > 470.01< / > 305.96< / > 0.76< / > 19.90< / > | 罗斯百货(Ross Stores)< / > 230.59< / > 2.31< / > 257.00< / > 157.39< / > 0.77< / > 27.68< / >< / > 皇家加勒比集团(Royal Caribbean Group)< / > 321.07< / > 13.89< / > 356.39< / > 222.21< / > 1.71< / > 119.36< / >< / > RTX< / > 202.79< / > 2.99< / > 226.88< / > 166.74< / > 1.44< / > 32.55< / >< / > 标普全球(S&P Global)< / > 475.17< / > 8.62< / > 552.25< / > 381.61< / > 0.82< / > 27.08< / >< / > 销售云(Salesforce)< / > 226.18< / > -2.99< / > 269.11< / > 146.32< / > 0.78< / > 20.67< / >< / > 斯伦贝谢(Schlumberger)< / > 52.31< / > -1.43< / > 60.46< / > 34.65< / > 2.26< / > 11.60< / >< / > 塞姆普拉(Sempra)< / > 85.97< / > -0.09< / > 101.04< / > 76.21< / > 3.06< / > 24.92< / >< / > 服务现在(ServiceNow)< / > 106.01< / > 0.89< / > 947.85< / > 81.24< / > 0.00< / > 62.73< / >< / > 西蒙财产集团(Simon Property Group)< / > 221.73< / > 3.98< / > 238.50< / > 172.19< / > 4.06< / > 15.65< / >< / > 雪花云(Snowflake)< / > 290.68< / > -15.40< / > 304.56< / > 118.00< / > 0.00< / > 94.38< / >< / > 南方电力(Southern)< / > 100.00< / > -0.00< / > 100.00< / > 70.00< / > 0.00< / > 70.00< / >< / > 南方电力(Southern Co)< / > 94.61< / > 0.98< / > 99.58< / > 81.69< / > 3.21< / > 22.69< / >< / > 南方铜矿(Southern Copper)< / > 179.36< / > 1.83< / > 223.88< / > 119.25< / > 2.40< / > 23.88< / >< / > Spotify科技< / > 594.04< / > 0.60< / > 668.50< / > 405.00< / > 0.00< / > 266.39< / >< / > 星巴克(Starbucks Corp)< / > 104.40< / > 0.73< / > 110.51< / > 77.99< / > 2.41< / > 60.35< / >< / > 策略(Strategy)< / > 130.76< / > 0.25< / > 276.32< / > 81.81< / > 0.00< / > 1.32< / >< / > 斯特赖克(Stryker)< / > 306.81< / > 14.95< / > 389.33< / > 267.00< / > 1.15< / > 32.43< / >< / > 赛普罗斯(Synopsys)< / > 466.08< / > -1.53< / > 539.48< / > 362.55< / > 0.00< / > 80.78< / >< / > 塔加资源(Targa Resources)< / > 294.73< / > -20.26< / > 316.60< / > 151.24< / > 1.70< / > 28.10< / >< / > 塔吉特(Target)< / > 158.38< / > 4.00< / > 170.75< / > 83.44< / > 2.93< / > 16.36< / >< / > TE连接(TE Connectivity)< / > 217.51< / > 4.48< / > 252.56< / > 190.27< / > 1.43< / > 21.16< / >< / > 特斯拉(Tesla)< / > 403.82< / > 4.01< / > 498.83< / > 297.38< / > 0.00< / > 342.22< / >< / > 德州仪器(Texas Instruments)< / > 302.02< / > 1.18< / > 334.03< / > 152.73< / > 2.01< / > 36.92< / >< / > 阿尔斯特(The Alstate)< / > 263.99< / > 4.12< / > 277.22< / > 168.15< / > 1.64< / > 5.22< / >< / > 查理·施瓦布(The Charles Schwab)< / > 88.71< / > 0.66< / > 114.53< / > 83.86< / > 1.44< / > 16.07< / >< / > 西格纳集团(The Cigna Group)< / > 295.19< / > -3.04< / > 316.26< / > 239.51< / > 2.11< / > 12.43< / >< / > 可口可乐(The Coca-Cola)< / > 95.83< / > 1.75< / > 95.37< / > 67.27< / > 2.21< / > 28.19< / >< / > 克罗格(The Kroger)< / > 68.05< / > 0.35< / > 73.80< / > 50.00< / > 4.01< / > 48.70< / >< / > 埃默瑞克斯(The Emeryx)< / > 352.37< / > 19.76< / > 377.77< / > 289.86< / > 0.91< / > 32.12< / >< / >
| 公司 | 价格< / > 变化< / > 52周最高< / > 52周最低< / > 市盈率< / > 市净率< / > |
Cos | 141.00< / > 0.69< / > 170.00< / > 122.78< / > 1.36< / > 25.78< / >< / >
The Williams Cos< / > 71.19< / > -3.16< / > 80.08< / > 56.19< / > 2.95< / > 28.36< / >< / >
Thermo Fisher Scientific< / > 862.65< / > -14.35< / > 711.85< / > 435.27< / > 0.28< / > 35.95< / >< / >
T-Mobile US< / > 160.15< / > 3.71< / > 224.75< / > 143.75< / > 2.64< / > 15.40< / >< / >
Trade Connectors< / > 413.33< / > 3.33< / > 505.87< / > 348.06< / > 1.02< / > 28.53< / >< / >
TransDigm Group< / > 1213.62< / > 66.81< / > 1463.03< / > 1071.25< / > 0.00< / > 36.81< / >< / >
Travelers< / > 398.80< / > 2.58< / > 407.87< / > 264.25< / > 1.25< / > 10.33< / >< / >
Truist Financial< / > 50.17< / > 1.38< / > 56.20< / > 43.12< / > 4.15< / > 12.73< / >< / >
Uber Technologies< / > 66.71< / > 1.46< / > 100.35< / > 64.04< / > 0.00< / > 14.44< / >< / >
Union Pacific< / > 307.00< / > 3.00< / > 315.99< / > 216.32< / > 1.85< / > 25.58< / >< / >
United Parcel Service B< / > 109.71< / > 1.46< / > 122.41< / > 90.84< / > 5.98< / > 20.39< / >< / >
United Rentals< / > 1175.42< / > 5.37< / > 1202.12< / > 701.59< / > 0.67< / > 25.82< / >< / >
UnitedHealth Group< / > 400.44< / > -6.53< / > 461.62< / > 255.97< / > 2.32< / > 25.67< / >< / >
US Bancorp< / > 60.49< / > 1.04< / > 66.08< / > 45.02< / > 3.57< / > 12.07< / >< / >
Valero Energy< / > 381.46< / > -18.20< / > 461.52< / > 159.80< / > 7.26< / > 8.67< / >< / >
Verizon Communications< / > 59.05< / > -0.55< / > 51.58< / > 39.80< / > 6.38< / > 11.42< / >< / >
Vermilion Media Group A< / > 32.34< / > 0.92< / > 59.00< / > 27.17< / > 4.64< / > 0.00< / >< / >
Vertex Pharmaceuticals< / > 553.15< / > -5.73< / > 563.80< / > 403.16< / > 0.00< / > 31.96< / >< / >
Visa A< / > 425.51< / > 11.92< / > 417.00< / > 293.89< / > 0.73< / > 36.15< / >< / >
Vistra< / > 134.61< / > -3.76< / > 196.80< / > 132.66< / > 0.69< / > 22.43< / >< / >
Walmart< / > 127.69< / > 4.18< / > 135.16< / > 98.88< / > 0.78< / > 46.10< / >< / >
Walt Disney< / > 113.11< / > 2.17< / > 117.09< / > 92.19< / > 1.33< / > 23.23< / >< / >
Waste Management< / > 237.71< / > 4.26< / > 248.13< / > 194.11< / > 1.59< / > 31.11< / >< / >
Wells Fargo< / > 85.89< / > 2.49< / > 97.76< / > 72.78< / > 2.33< / > 11.95< / >< / >
Welltower< / > 239.00< / > 4.40< / > 255.20< / > 178.19< / > 1.42< / > 97.55< / >< / >
Workday A< / > 198.13< / > 0.31< / > 241.32< / > 110.36< / > 0.00< / > 40.27< / >< / >
WW Grainger< / > 1377.66< / > 18.49< / > 1419.91< / > 906.52< / > 0.72< / > 35.06< / >< / >
Yum Brands< / > 157.60< / > 2.20< / > 170.14< / > 134.26< / > 1.90< / > 19.72< / >< / >
Zscelta A< / > 83.18< / > 3.46< / > 144.83< / > 68.77< / > 2.55< / > 13.57< / >< / > | 贵金属< / >< / >
黄金< / > 3927.06< / > -40.45< / >< / >
白银(美元计价)< / > 49.69< / > -0.95< / >< / >
铂金< / > 1429.50< / > -14.90< / >< / >
钯金< / > 938.49< / > -26.46< / >< / >
铁矿石< / > 91.30< / > 0.32< / >< / >
| 大宗商品< / >< / >
巴尔的克干散货指数< / > 2590.00< / > -58.00< / >< / >
理查兹 ICE 期货< / > 128.25< / > -5.00< / >< / >
|
能源 | 价格< / > 变化< / > | 布伦特原油< / > 103.46< / > -1.31< / >< / > 天然气< / > 2.89< / > 0.03< / >< / > 轻质原油< / > 95.99< / > -0.47< / >< / > 3.5%燃料油< / > 575.08< / > -68.44< / >< / > 欧罗拿夫油< / > 901.79< / > -80.29< / > |
波动性指数
| 基础金属< / >< / > 铝< / > 3032.50< / > -61.50< / >< / > 铜< / > 14033.00< / > -312.00< / >< / > 铅< / > 1884.50< / > -21.00< / >< / > 镍< / > 15350.00< / > -206.00< / >< / > 锡< / > 47520.00< / > -2139.00< / >< / > 锌< / > 3794.00< / > -98.50< / > |
Tradeweb
股票< / > 价格< / > 涨跌< / >< / > Crown Castle< / > 87.03< / > -1.68< / >< / > CSX< / > 51.62< / > -0.37< / >< / > Cummins< / > 500.60< / > 0.51< / >< / > CVG Health< / > 88.51< / > -1.74< / >< / > Danaher< / > 227.97< / > -4.26< / >< / > Deere & Co< / > 667.60< / > -7.88< / >< / > Cell Technologies C< / > 392.78< / > -31.52< / >< / > Diamondback Energy< / > 199.74< / > -12.34< / >< / > Digital Realty Trust< / > 175.95< / > -4.75< / >< / > Dominion Energy< / > 67.72< / > 1.10< / >< / > DoorDash A< / > 190.07< / > 11.08< / >< / > DR Horton< / > 152.93< / > 6.93< / >< / > Duke Energy< / > 128.38< / > 0.99< / >< / > Eaton Corp< / > 366.07< / > -3.90< / >< / > Ecolab< / > 308.38< / > 5.40< / >< / > Edwards Lifesciences Corp< / > 93.26< / > 1.25< / >< / > Elevance Health< / > 413.60< / > -4.74< / >< / > Eaton Products & Co< / > 1410.96< / > -6.55< / >< / > Emerson Electric< / > 165.98< / > 1.02< / >< / > EOG Resources< / > 157.89< / > -7.65< / >< / > Equinix< / > 993.69< / > -20.01< / >< / > Exelon< / > 46.45< / > 0.29< / >< / > ExxonMobil Hldgs< / > 179.67< / > -7.58< / >< / > Fastenal< / > 52.55< / > 0.64< / >< / > FedEx< / > 318.25< / > 4.97< / >< / > Ferguson Est< / > 242.16< / > 3.48< / >< / > FICO / SSAC< / > 724.19< / > 12.96< / >< / > Fiserv< / > 51.33< / > 1.91< / >< / > Flutter Entertainment< / > 87.66< / > 5.07< / >< / > Fortinet Inc< / > 126.21< / > -9.87< / >< / > Freeport McMoRan< / > 62.97< / > 0.50< / >< / > Garmin< / > 274.29< / > 1.62< / >< / > GE Aerospace< / > 315.70< / > 13.98< / >< / > Hilton Worldwide Holdings< / > 764.71< / > 7.79< / >< / > Home Depot< / > 341.15< / > 11.95< / >< / > Honeywell International< / > 223.77< / > 5.44< / >< / > Howmet Aerospace< / > 212.99< / > 13.77< / >< / > IBM< / > 252.51< / > -5.30< / >< / > Illinois Tool Works< / > 290.05< / > 11.50< / >< / > Intel< / > 59.97< / > -5.79< / >< / > Interactive Brokers F< / > 74.63< / > -2.07< / >< / >
交易 | 172.28< / > 3.43< / > |
Intuit< / > 352.10< / > 11.01< / >< / >
Intuitive Surgical< / > 436.87< / > 4.86< / >< / >
Johnson & Johnson< / > 270.58< / > -2.64< / >< / >
Johnson Controls Ltd< / > 146.49< / > -2.54< / >< / >
JPMorgan Chase< / > 340.58< / > 3.54< / >< / >
肯尼亚< / > 19.31< / > < / >< / >
Keurig Dr Pepper< / > 36.82< / > 0.98< / >< / >
Kimberly-Clark< / > 108.25< / > 0.31< / >< / >
Kinder Morgan< / > 32.71< / > -1.16< / >< / >
KKR & Co< / > 98.07< / > 3.62< / >< / >
KLA< / > 153.11< / > -4.80< / >< / >
L3Harris Technologies< / > 278.96< / > 1.35< / >< / >
Lam Research< / > 227.56< / > -11.55< / >< / >
Linde< / > 519.72< / > 5.48< / >< / >
Lockheed Martin< / > 643.15< / > 6.20< / >< / >
Lowe's< / > 218.15< / > 9.08< / >< / >
Lululemon Athletica< / > 107.63< / > 0.59< / >< / >
Marathon Petroleum< / > 430.39< / > -14.34< / >< / >
Marathon Petroleum A< / > 436.73< / > -17.03< / >< / >
Marsh< / > 205.38< / > 4.76< / >< / >
Marvell Technology< / > 171.41< / > -24.99< / >< / >
Mastercard A< / > 658.10< / > 20.69< / >< / >
麦当劳< / > 265.64< / > 7.52< / >< / >
McKesson< / > 998.38< / > 3.80< / >< / >
Medtronic< / > 99.29< / > 2.75< / >< / >
Merck & Co< / > 148.36< / > -1.16< / >< / >
Meta Platforms A< / > 606.73< / > -8.26< / >< / >
MetLife< / > 100.94< / > 0.92< / >< / >
Micron Technology< / > 833.59< / > -51.15< / >< / >
Microsoft< / > 507.12< / > -14.79< / >< / >
Mondelez International A< / > 66.38< / > 1.44< / >< / >
Monster Beverage< / > 48.02< / > 0.68< / >< / >
Moody's< / > 506.02< / > 12.11< / >< / >
Morgan Stanley< / > 185.73< / > 1.43< / >< / >
Motorola Solutions< / > 487.31< / > -4.22< / >< / >
Morgan Stanley A< / > 637.23< / > -13.83< / >< / >
Nasdaq< / > 108.62< / > 2.39< / >< / >
Netflix< / > 62.34< / > 0.26< / >< / >
Newmont Corp< / > 109.09< / > 2.48< / >< / >
NextEra Energy< / > 85.03< / > 1.32< / >< / >
NIKE B< / > 39.12< / > 0.45< / >< / >
Norfolk Southern< / > 345.68< / > 3.04< / >< / >
Northrop Grumman< / > 555.32< / > -2.22< / >< / >
Nu Holdings A< / > 11.62< / > 0.01< / >< / >
英伟达< / > 202.06< / > -2.58< / >< / >
NXP半导体< / > 257.24< / > -2.37< / >< / >
Occidental Petroleum< / > 60.72< / > -3.28< / >< / >
|
农业< / > 价格< / > 变化< / >< / >
玉米< / > 444.25< / > -4.00< / >< / >
小麦< / > 192.25< / > -0.50< / >< / >
油菜籽< / > 539.75< / > -6.25< / >< / >
向日葵籽< / > 10330.00< / > -70.00< / >< / >
大豆< / > 1202.00< / > -2.75< / >< / >
大豆粕< / > 318.10< / > -1.50< / >< / >
可可(ICE Liffe)< / > 4140.00< / > -3.00< / >< / >
可可(ICE US)< / > 5410.00< / > -25.00< / >< / >
咖啡(罗布斯塔)< / > 3227.00< / > 34.00< / >< / >
咖啡(阿拉比卡)< / > 357.00< / > -4.30< / >< / >
白糖< / > 509.40< / > -6.90< / >< / >
糖#11< / > 18.39< / > -0.67< / >< / >
棉花< / > 76.96< / > -0.70< / >< / >
橙汁< / > 132.00< / > 16.65< / >
11< / > < / >< / >
枫糖浆< / > < / >< / >
|
Leaf | 3913.20< / > -20.21< / > |
Live Cattle< / > 219.30< / > -0.40< / >< / >
Feeder Cattle< / > 335.45< / > -2.98< / >< / >
Lean Hogs< / > 58.78< / > 0.60< / >< / >
Palm Oil (Malaysian)< / > 1129.25< / > -25.25< / >< / >
|
来源:能源:NYMEX。基础金属:LME / 伦敦金属交易所。玉米、小麦、大豆:芝加哥期货交易所(CBOT)。活牛、育肥牛、瘦猪:芝加哥商品交易所(CME)。
< / > Red Date< / > Coupon< / > Bid Price< / > Bid Yield< / > Daily< / > Weekly< / >< / >
| US$< / >< / >
Morgan Stanley< / > 30 / 01< / > 4.00< / > 97.87< / > 4.57< / > 0.00< / > 0.23< / >< / >
Trust Finl Corp< / > 28 / 06< / > 4.12< / > 99.53< / > 5.12< / > -0.01< / > 0.09< / >< / >
National Rural< / > 32 / 11< / > 4.02< / > 92.88< / > 5.27< / > 0.50< / > 0.30< / >< / >
Washington Gaslight Co< / > 36 / 03< / > 5.78< / > 97.97< / > 5.02< / > 0.00< / >< / >
Northern States Power< / > 28 / 03< / > 8.13< / > 100.66< / > 5.05< / > 0.00< / >< / >
Oklahoma Gas & Elec< / > 28 / 04< / > 6.50< / > 102.07< / > 4.58< / > 0.12< / > 0.45< / >< / > | Euro< / >< / >
Germany< / > 25 / 08< / > 2.22< / > 89.21< / > 3.07< / > -0.01< / > 0.23< / >< / >
Spain< / > 46 / 10< / > 2.88< / > 81.20< / > 4.32< / > -0.40< / > 0.63< / >< / >
Belgium< / > 47 / 06< / > 1.50< / > 57.02< / > 4.98< / > -0.19< / > -0.49< / >< / >
France< / > 48 / 05< / > 2.00< / > 57.57< / > 5.37< / > -0.43< / >< / >
| £ Sterling< / >< / >
United Kingdom< / > 46 / 12< / > 4.25< / > 83.14< / > 5.67< / > -0.69< / >< / >
United Kingdom< / > 47 / 07< / > 1.50< / > 49.23< / > 5.71< / > -0.52< / >< / >
rowspan="2">加拿大 | 06 / 27< / > 1.00< / > 99.03< / > 2.82< / > 0.00< / > 0.03< / > -0.18< / > |
12 / 55< / > 2.75< / > 77.17< / > 3.93< / > 0.00< / > 0.03< / > 0.13< / > 0.15< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">丹麦< / > 11 / 33< / > 2.25< / > 95.02< / > 2.78< / > 0.00< / > 0.20< / >< / >
11 / 39< / > 4.50< / > 112.91< / > 3.27< / > 0.03< / > -0.02< / > -0.14< / > 0.34< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">芬兰< / > 09 / 27< / > 0.50< / > 97.92< / > 2.95< / > 0.01< / > 0.02< / > -0.02< / > 0.82< / >< / >
09 / 33< / > 3.00< / > 96.58< / > 3.55< / > 0.04< / > -0.08< / > 0.58< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">法国< / > 05 / 54< / > 3.00< / > 65.69< / > 5.43< / > 0.05< / > 0.06< / > 0.98< / >< / >
11 / 33< / > 3.50< / > 93.36< / > 4.61< / > 0.05< / > 0.00< / > -1.58< / > -0.33< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">德国< / > 08 / 33< / > 2.60< / > 96.27< / > 3.21< / > 0.04< / > -0.04< / > -0.10< / > 0.51< / >< / >
08 / 53< / > 1.75< / > 68.09< / > 3.70< / > 0.02< / > 0.00< / > -0.13< / > 0.71< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">希腊< / > 06 / 28< / > 3.88< / > 101.11< / > 3.15< / > -0.02< / > -0.08< / > -0.27< / > 0.71< / >< / >
06 / 33< / > 4.25< / > 101.44< / > 3.99< / > 0.00< / > 0.76< / > -0.24< / > 0.71< / >< / >
爱尔兰< / > 10 / 32< / > 0.35< / > 84.39< / > 3.28< / > 0.03< / > -0.03< / > -0.45< / > 0.65< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">意大利< / > 12 / 27< / > 2.63< / > 99.40< / > 3.23< / > 0.01< / > 0.00< / > -0.10< / > 0.99< / >< / >
03 / 34< / > 4.13< / > 100.18< / > 4.21< / > 0.04< / > -0.07< / > -0.16< / > 0.90< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">荷兰< / > 01 / 54< / > 2.00< / > 71.14< / > 3.70< / > 0.04< / > 0.01< / > -0.13< / > 0.12< / >< / >
07 / 33< / > 2.50< / > 95.36< / > 3.28< / > 0.04< / > -0.05< / > -0.15< / > 0.48< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">波兰< / > 04 / 28< / > 2.75< / > 97.68< / > 4.41< / > -0.04< / > -0.09< / > -0.17< / > 0.57< / >< / >
10 / 33< / > 6.00< / > 100.09< / > 5.98< / > -0.09< / > -0.16< / > -0.10< / > 1.05< / >< / >
葡萄牙< / > 07 / 32< / > 1.63< / > 90.87< / > 3.42< / > 0.03< / > -0.08< / > -0.21< / > 0.63< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">西班牙< / > 10 / 52< / > 1.88< / > 61.63< / > 4.41< / > 0.04< / > -0.03< / > -0.13< / > 0.83< / >< / >
10 / 33< / > 3.50< / > 99.31< / > 3.66< / > 0.04< / > -0.06< / > -0.15< / > 0.61< / >< / >
瑞士< / > 03 / 36< / > 2.50< / > 118.36< / > 0.32< / > 0.00< / > -0.02< / > -0.22< / > -0.49< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">英国< / > 06 / 28< / > 0.00< / > 92.96< / > 4.70< / > 0.02< / > -0.08< / > 0.01< / > 0.94< / >< / >
10 / 53< / > 3.75< / > 73.02< / > 5.73< / > 0.07< / > -0.05< / > -0.18< / > 0.51< / >< / >
< rowspan="2">美国< / > 11 / 33< / > 4.50< / > 97.92< / > 4.85< / > 0.08< / > -0.06< / > -0.32< / > 0.88< / >< / >
11 / 53< / > 4.75< / > 91.20< / > 5.37< / > 0.08< / > 0.02< / > -0.30< / > 0.54< / >< / >
英国国债现金市场
11月03日 |
价格< / >
收益率< / >
红利收益率< / >
日变动< / >
周变动< / >
最高< / >
最低< / >
|
1.25% '27 (03)< / >
97.94< / >
1.28< / >
4.23< / >
0.< / >
0.< / >
97.89< / >
0.01< / >
< / >
0.875% '29 (29)< / >
89.41< / >
0.98< / >
4.75< / >
-0.14< / >
0.38< / >
91.00< / >
0.01< / >
< / >
1% '32 (32)< / >
82.11< / >
1.22< / >
4.92< / >
-0.18< / >
0.55< / >
85.07< / >
81.01< / >
4.25% '36 (36)< / >
93.03< / >
4.57< / >
5.20< / >
-0.39< / >
0.63< / >
99.39< / >
91.15< / >
4.5% '42 (42)< / >
88.81< / >
5.07< / >
5.56< / >
-0.51< / >
0.76< / >
96.45< / >
85.71< / >
3.75% '52 (52)< / >
74.08< / >
5.06< / >
5.68< / >
-0.58< / >
0.71< / >
81.50< / >
70.51< / >
4% '60 (60)< / >
75.70< / >
5.28< / >
5.62< / >
-0.66< / >
0.79< / >
83.52< / >
71.62< / >
|
英国国债(GILTS)— FTSE 精算师指数(UK FTSE ACTUARIES INDICES)
价格指数(固定利率债券)< / >
11月03日< / >
日变动%< / >
总回报< / >
月回报%< / >
年回报%< / >
收益率< / >
5年及以下< / >
84.83< / >
-0.07< / >
2666.04< / >
0.40< / >
1.42< / >
4.76< / >
5-10年< / >
142.84< / >
-0.29< / >
3393.68< / >
0.96< / >
-0.66< / >
5.09< / >
10-15年< / >
142.56< / >
-0.48< / >
3747.60< / >
1.83< / >
-1.45< / >
5.42< / >
5-15年< / >
141.16< / >
-0.35< / >
3471.70< / >
1.24< / >
-0.89< / >
5.23< / >
15年以上< / >
167.87< / >
-0.78< / >
3371.03< / >
3.46< / >
-3.11< / >
5.63< / >
所有股票< / >
125.71< / >
-0.34< / >
3158.20< / >
1.42< / >
-0.61< / >
5.37< / >
|
指数联结债券< / >
11月03日< / >
日变动%< / >
月变动%< / >
年变动%< / >
总回报< / >
1月回报%< / >
1年回报%< / >
5年及以下< / >
365.88< / >
-0.17< / >
0.10< / >
3.00< / >
3193.02< / >
0.11< / >
3.83< / >
5年以上< / >
476.63< / >
-0.78< / >
1.41< / >
-0.34< / >
3737.40< / >
1.41< / >
0.29< / >
5-15年< / >
460.50< / >
-0.47< / >
0.45< / >
1.68< / >
3869.92< / >
0.45< / >
2.45< / >
15年以上< / >
481.23< / >
-1.10< / >
2.44< / >
-2.18< / >
3635.13< / >
2.44< / >
-1.69< / >
所有股票< / >
473.25< / >
-0.64< / >
1.12< / >
0.31< / >
3787.49< / >
1.12< / >
0.97< / >
收益率指数< / >
11月02日< / >
去年同期< / >
5年< / >
4.89< / >
4.85< / >
4.26< / >
10年< / >
5.24< / >
5.19< / >
4.59< / >
15年< / >
5.50< / >
5.45< / >
4.88< / >
20年< / >
5.62< / >
5.57< / >
5.02< / >
45年< / >
5.42< / >
5.36< / >
4.91< / >
实际收益率(0%通胀)< / >
久期(年)< / >
前值< / >
去年同期< / >
1.04< / >
2.55< / >
0.98< / >
0.73< / >
5年以上< / >
2.25< / >
16.18< / >
2.20< / >
1.90< / >
2.02< / >
9.37< / >
1.97< / >
1.61< / >
2.35< / >
22.96< / >
2.30< / >
2.01< / >
2.20< / >
13.27< / >
2.15< / >
1.86< / >
Real Yield 5% Inflation |
Nov 3< / >
Dur Yrs< / >
Previous< / >
Yr Ago< / >
|
Up to 5 Years< / >
0.78< / >
2.55< / >
0.71< / >
0.43< / >
< / >
Over 5 Years< / >
2.22< / >
16.18< / >
2.17< / >
1.88< / >
< / >
5-15 Years< / >
1.96< / >
9.37< / >
1.91< / >
1.54< / >
Over 15 Years< / >
2.33< / >
22.96< / >
2.29< / >
2.00< / >
All stocks< / >
2.16< / >
13.27< / >
2.11< / >
1.82< / >
|
《金融时报》
See FTSE website for more details www.ftse.com/products/indices/gilts.
© 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC. All rights reserved. The Tradeweb FTSE Gilt Closing Prices information contained herein is proprietary to Tradeweb; may not be copied or re-distributed; is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely; and does not constitute investment advice. Tradeweb is not responsible for any loss or damage that might result from the use of this information.

GILTS: UK FTSE ACTUARIES INDICES | Price IndicesFixed Coupon | Nov 3 | Dayschg % | TotalReturn | MonthReturn | YearReturn | Yield | Up to 5 Years | 84.83 | -0.07 | 2666.04 | 0.40 | 1.42 | 4.76 | 5-10 Years | 142.84 | -0.29 | 3393.68 | 0.96 | -0.66 | 5.09 | 10-15 Years | 142.56 | -0.48 | 3747.60 | 1.83 | -1.45 | 5.42 | 5-15 Years | 141.16 | -0.35 | 3471.70 | 1.24 | -0.89 | 5.23 | Over 15 Years | 167.87 | -0.78 | 3371.03 | 3.46 | -3.11 | 5.63 | All stocks | 125.71 | -0.34 | 3158.20 | 1.42 | -0.61 | 5.37 | Index Linked | Nov 3 | Day'schg % | Monthchg % | Year'schg % | TotalReturn | Return1 Month | Return1 Year | Up to 5 Years | 365.88 | -0.17 | 0.10 | 3.00 | 3193.02 | 0.11 | 3.83 | Over 5 Years | 476.63 | -0.78 | 1.41 | -0.34 | 3737.40 | 1.41 | 0.29 | 5-15 Years | 460.50 | -0.47 | 0.45 | 1.68 | 3869.92 | 0.45 | 2.45 | Over 15 Years | 481.23 | -1.10 | 2.44 | -2.18 | 3635.13 | 2.44 | -1.69 | All stocks | 473.25 | -0.64 | 1.12 | 0.31 | 3787.49 | 1.12 | 0.97 | Yield Indices | Nov 3 | Nov 2 | Yr Ago | 5 Yrs | 4.89 | 4.85 | 4.26 | 10 Yrs | 5.24 | 5.19 | 4.59 | 15 Yrs | 5.50 | 5.45 | 4.88 | 20 Yrs | 5.62 | 5.57 | 5.02 | 45 Yrs | 5.42 | 5.36 | 4.91 | Real Yield 0% Inflation | Nov 3 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago | Up to 5 Years | 1.04 | 2.55 | 0.98 | 0.73 | Over 5 Years | 2.25 | 16.18 | 2.20 | 1.90 | 5-15 Years | 2.02 | 9.37 | 1.97 | 1.61 | Over 15 Years | 2.35 | 22.96 | 2.30 | 2.01 | All stocks | 2.20 | 13.27 | 2.15 | 1.86 | Real Yield 5% Inflation | Nov 3 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago | Up to 5 Years | 0.78 | 2.55 | 0.71 | 0.43 | Over 5 Years | 2.22 | 16.18 | 2.17 | 1.88 | 5-15 Years | 1.96 | 9.37 | 1.91 | 1.54 | Over 15 Years | 2.33 | 22.96 | 2.29 | 2.00 | All stocks | 2.16 | 13.27 | 2.11 | 1.82 | FT
FINANCIAL TIMES
利润。能量。政治。
当前价格 / 日变化 / 最高价 / 最低价 / 52周最高 / 52周最低
------------------- / ---------- / -------- / ----------
CT PrivEq / 467.00 / -1.00 / 592.00 / 439.84 / 691.09 / -32.56
HGCapital / 392.50 / -1.50 / 512.00 / 318.64 / 530.50 / -25.54
HVPE / 3320.00 / -30.00 / 3500.00 / 2807.59 / 4541.00 / -26.89
ICG Ent / 1404.00 / — / 1572.00 / 1288.31 / 2092.36 / -33.66
Pantheon Int / 387.00 / -4.50 / 409.00 / 339.05 / — / -29.25
Partners PE € / 570.76 / -8.42 / 958.06 / 567.42 / 11.53 / -39.81
当前价格 / 日变化 / 最高价 / 最低价 / 52周最高 / 52周最低
------------------- / ---------- / -------- / ----------
Conventional - Property ICs / —
AEW UK REIT / 104.00 / 0.20 / 113.20 / 95.90 / 7.69 / 3.92
TR Prop / 284.50 / -2.00 / 364.50 / 265.00 / 5.66 / 9.92
VCTs / —
Bmd 2nd VT / 44.40 / — / 54.00 / 39.50 / 9.01 / 4.62
Nthn 2 VCT / 53.00 / — / 56.50 / 47.00 / 5.66 / 4.33
Nthn 3 VCT / 82.00 / — / 86.50 / 79.50 / 5.49 / 4.65
Nthn Venture / 56.00 / — / 59.50 / 52.00 / 5.54 / 4.44
Zero Dividend Preference Shares / —
Aberforth GV / 119.50 / — / 121.36 / 111.00 / — / 2.00
Investment Companies - AIM / —
Crys Amber / 68.00 / — / 155.39 / 67.00 / 171.48 / -60.35
Profit. Power. Politics. | CT PrivEq | 467.00 | -1.00 | 592.00 | 439.84 | 6.06 | 691.09 | -32.56 | HGCapital | 392.50 | -1.50 | 512.00 | 318.64 | 1.27 | 530.50 | -25.54 | HVPE | 3320.00 | -30.00 | 3500.00 | 2807.59 | — | 4541.00 | -26.89 | ICG Ent | 1404.00 | — | 1572.00 | 1288.31 | 2.99 | 2092.36 | -33.66 | Pantheon Int | 387.00 | -4.50 | 409.00 | 339.05 | — | 546.30 | -29.25 | Partners PE € | 570.76 | -8.42 | 958.06 | 567.42 | 9.50 | 11.53 | -39.81 |
|
< rowspan="2" colspan="2">价格 ± 日变化< / >
| 52周< / >
< ="2">收益率< / >
< ="2">市盈率< / >
< ="2">成交量(千股)< / >
|
最高< / >
最低< / >
< / >
| 航空航天与国防< / >
< / >
BAE Systems●< / >
2075.00< / >
2.00< / >
2360.00< / >
1529.00< / >
1.82< / >
30.16< / >
3116.56< / >
Chemring Group< / >
560.00< / >
-5.00< / >
650.75< / >
446.52< / >
1.45< / >
31.46< / >
763.44< / >
| 汽车及零部件< / >
Ford Motors< / >
920.95< / >
-18.19< / >
1319.04< / >
841.76< / >
4.86< / >
-6.30< / >
—< / >
| 银行< / >
ANZ Group< / >
2098.42< / >
-22.75< / >
2170.35< / >
1753.25< / >
5.39< / >
20.72< / >
3316.22< / >
Banco Santander< / >
853.00< / >
-10.00< / >
1122.00< / >
757.28< / >
2.00< / >
11.23< / >
179.04< / >
Bank of Nova Scotia< / >
6987.03< / >
-37.41< / >
7165.88< / >
4970.34< / >
3.48< / >
—< / >
601.80< / >
Barclays●< / >
419.55< / >
-4.55< / >
554.10< / >
361.35< / >
2.74< / >
9.58< / >
78641.14< / >
Canadian Imperial Bank< / >
8700.35< / >
-31.50< / >
9198.88< / >
6299.86< / >
2.62< / >
215.39< / >
HSBC●< / >
1258.00< / >
-25.40< / >
1610.00< / >
1027.80< / >
4.44< / >
13.95< / >
35067.66< / >
Lion Finance Group< / >
12110.00< / >
60.00< / >
14820.00< / >
7525.00< / >
2.62< / >
8.39< / >
96.19< / >
Lloyds Banking Group●< / >
93.70< / >
-1.52< / >
123.10< / >
84.64< / >
4.28< / >
13.39< / >
199815.50< / >
NatWest Group< / >
580.00< / >
-12.20< / >
788.20< / >
504.41< / >
6.03< / >
10.84< / >
18905.87< / >
OSB Group< / >
486.60< / >
-0.40< / >
647.50< / >
470.80< / >
7.38< / >
6.44< / >
768.46< / >
Perm TSB Group< / >
250.33< / >
-0.04< / >
291.66< / >
219.75< / >
0.61< / >
6.61< / >
4.45< / >
Royal Bank of Canada●< / >
15150.90< / >
-125.04< / >
16187.03< / >
10898.58< / >
2.48< / >
345.80< / >
Standard Chartered< / >
2053.00< / >
-2.00< / >
2364.00< / >
1471.50< / >
2.50< / >
14.10< / >
3706.01< / >
7.375%优先股< / >
107.40< / >
128.84< / >
102.00< / >
6.87< / >
2.25< / >
8.25%优先股< / >
119.50< / >
143.80< / >
114.25< / >
6.90< / >
29.32< / >
Toronto-Dominion Bank< / >
9292.77< / >
-47.54< / >
9573.36< / >
6064.01< / >
2.52< / >
592.48< / >
Westpac< / >
1915.31< / >
-29.62< / >
2275.39< / >
1755.74< / >
4.18< / >
18.47< / >
6041.18< / >
|
Elementis< / >
191.00< / >
1.00< / >
196.09< / >
136.00< / >
1.74< / >
-32.85< / >
689.18< / >
Johnson Matthey< / >
2430.00< / >
10.00< / >
3245.25< / >
2192.00< / >
4.22< / >
-31.86< / >
318.64< / >
Victrex< / >
912.00< / >
-2.00< / >
1024.00< / >
515.00< / >
3.29< / >
28.50< / >
193.86< / >
| 建筑与材料< / >
Galliford Try Holdings< / >
719.00< / >
-4.00< / >
728.00< / >
466.00< / >
3.27< / >
17.24< / >
227.57< / >
Morgan Sindall< / >
4130.00< / >
-6.00< / >
5730.00< / >
3794.00< / >
3.95< / >
11.10< / >
114.19< / >
| 电子与电气设备< / >
discoverIE< / >
|
Grp / 840.00 / 4.00 / 917.00 / 505.00 / [OMITTED] / 27.81 / 140.82
------------------- / -------- / ------- / -------- / ----------- / ------- / --------
Halma / 3476.00 / -24.00 / 4802.00 / 3198.00 / 0.71 / 35.26 / 520.17
Morgan Adv Mat♦ / 266.50 / 1.00 / 294.50 / 179.80 / 4.58 / 35.53 / 481.77
Oxford Instruments / 2598.00 / 10.00 / 3318.00 / 1776.00 / 0.91 / 30.71 / 168.72
Renishaw♦ / 5270.00 / 30.00 / 6030.00 / 3280.00 / 1.56 / 32.23 / 55.64
TT Electronics / 188.00 / 0.80 / 199.20 / 98.00 / [OMITTED] / -6.60 / 342.58
XP Power / 1722.00 / 8.00 / 2160.00 / 849.23 / [OMITTED] / -41.00 / 21.30
Financial General | 3i Group■< / > 2562.00< / > 34.00< / > 4403.00< / > 1825.00< / > 3.30< / > [OMITTED]< / >< / >
Aberdeen Group< / > 223.80< / > -1.00< / > 265.00< / > 179.60< / > 6.52< / > 10.36< / > 2424.47< / >< / >
ASA International< / > 242.00< / > -5.00< / > 297.00< / > 165.00< / > 5.06< / > 5.70< / > 53.38< / >< / >
Bridgepoint Group●< / > 407.40< / > -15.80< / > 423.20< / > 212.00< / > 2.41< / > 81.48< / > 2574.69< / >< / >
City of London Inv●< / > 441.00< / > -7.00< / > 544.00< / > 349.00< / > 7.71< / > 11.95< / > 28.71< / >< / >
Close Bros< / > 387.60< / > 0.80< / > 556.15< / > 318.40< / > [OMITTED]< / > -6.79< / > 282.38< / >< / >
ICG< / > 1912.00< / > 8.00< / > 2148.00< / > 1424.87< / > 4.55< / > 11.46< / > 481.93< / >< / >
Investec< / > 605.00< / > -1.50< / > 690.00< / > 499.36< / > 6.36< / > 7.85< / > 680.77< / >< / >
Jupiter< / > 177.60< / > 2.60< / > 214.50< / > 137.20< / > 3.38< / > 9.25< / > 1071.73< / >< / >
Liontrust< / > 292.00< / > 7.00< / > 358.00< / > 223.00< / > 6.51< / > 18.96< / > 316.47< / >< / >
London Stock Exa< / > 9454.00< / > -70.00< / > 10140.00< / > 6684.00< / > 1.67< / > 39.66< / > 736.85< / >< / >
Rathbones Group< / > 1768.00< / > 6.00< / > 2500.00< / > 1490.00< / > 5.66< / > 16.39< / > 105.09< / >< / >
S&U▲< / > 1875.00< / > -15.00< / > 2458.50< / > 1715.00< / > 6.19< / > 9.61< / > 5.75< / >< / >
St James's Place< / > 1081.00< / > -6.00< / > 1575.50< / > 1011.50< / > 1.67< / > 10.82< / > 776.83< / >< / >
TP ICAP Group▲< / > 320.00< / > -1.80< / > 355.00< / > 235.50< / > 5.38< / > 12.70< / > 1800.30< / >< / >
| < rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">日涨跌幅< / > | 52周< / >< rowspan="2">成交量(千股)< / > | 最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 市盈率< / >< / > | 航空航天与国防< / >< / > Cohort< / > 1362.00< / > -28.00< / > 1538.00< / > 881.10< / > 1.31< / > 26.08< / > 166.61< / >< / > Velocity Composites< / > 13.50< / > -0.75< / > 22.00< / > 12.00< / > —< / > -6.75< / > 1.76< / >< / > | 基本资源(不含采矿业)< / >< / > Cropper J< / > 815.00< / > -5.00< / > 840.00< / > 250.00< / > —< / > 26.46< / > 6.56< / >< / > | 建筑与材料< / >< / > Accsys Tech< / > 55.00< / > 1.80< / > 79.84< / > 52.20< / > —< / > 24.69< / > 25.40< / >< / > | 电子与电气设备< / >< / > Checkit< / > 14.50< / > —< / > 27.00< / > 13.99< / > —< / > -5.58< / > 12.06< / >< / > LPA< / > 82.00< / > —< / > 92.00< / > 34.00< / > —< / > -31.06< / > —< / >< / > Thorpe FW< / > 277.00< / > 10.00< / > 320.00< / > 240.00< / > 2.65< / > 11.68< / > 80.84< / >< / > | 金融(一般)< / >< / > Arbuthnot Banking< / > 810.00< / > —< / > 940.00< / > 755.00< / > 6.79< / > 7.42< / > 7.38< / > |
投资公司
< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">日涨跌幅< / > | 52周< / >< rowspan="2">分红溢价(-)< / >< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 净资产价值(NAV)< / >< / > | 传统(不含私募股权)< / >< / > 3i Infra< / > 395.00< / > 1.00< / > 389.50< / > 325.00< / > 3.41< / > 406.49< / > -3.68< / >< / > Abf GVIT< / > 94.00< / > 0.75< / > 96.77< / > 76.00< / > 6.49< / > 110.31< / > -15.76< / >< / > Abf Sml< / > 1900.00< / > -8.00< / > 1926.00< / > 1408.07< / > 2.52< / > 2105.14< / > -9.68< / >< / > Aberdeen Asia Foc< / > 404.00< / > -7.00< / > 478.00< / > 348.00< / > 1.59< / > 433.05< / > -8.44< / >< / > Aberdeen Asian Inc Fund< / > 287.00< / > -3.00< / > 357.00< / > 246.00< / > 6.93< / > 305.94< / > -7.89< / >< / > Aberdeen Eq Inc< / > 453.00< / > 1.00< / > 473.00< / > 359.25< / > 5.10< / > 457.46< / > -1.82< / >< / > Aberdeen UK Smll< / > 545.00< / > 3.00< / > 551.00< / > 441.50< / > —< / > 573.81< / > -5.24< / >< / > Alliance Witan< / > 1349.00< / > -9.00< / > 1412.03< / > 1178.00< / > 2.17< / > 1417.67< / > -4.74< / >< / > Allianz Tech< / > 646.00< / > -9.00< / > 789.00< / > 484.48< / > —< / > 694.65< / > -8.00< / >< / > Artemis UK Future Lead< / > 399.00< / > -4.00< / > 407.00< / > 321.00< / > 3.87< / > 462.64< / > -12.58< / >< / > Aurora UK Alpha< / > 259.00< / > -3.00< / > 279.00< / > 222.09< / > 1.81< / > 294.49< / > -10.95< / >< / > AVI Japan< / > 174.50< / > 0.50< / > 194.00< / > 154.50< / > 1.26< / > 185.53< / > -2.92< / >< / > BG China Growth< / > 269.00< / > 1.00< / > 331.04< / > 263.00< / > 0.93< / > 300.09< / > -10.77< / >< / > BG Euro< / > 122.00< / > -1.50< / > 133.00< / > 91.40< / > 0.59< / > 138.02< / > -11.16< / >< / > BG Japan< / > 1032.00< / > -8.00< / > 1114.00< / > 811.10< / > 0.97< / > 1149.18< / > -10.17< / >< / > BG Shin< / > 167.80< / > -0.40< / > 182.00< / > 123.05< / > 0.41< / > 185.08< / > -9.66< / >< / > BG US< / > —< / > < / >< / >
|
成长 | 348.50< / > -4.00< / > 398.00< / > 263.00< / > [...OMITTED...]< / > 380.42< / > -7.49< / > | < rowspan="2" colspan="2">价格 / 日变化< / >
| 52周< / >
< ="2">收益率< / >
< ="2">市盈率< / >
< ="2">成交量(千股)< / >
|
最高< / >
最低< / >
< / >
Vanquis Banking Group< / >
45.00< / >
-< / >
132.00< / >
41.30< / >
-< / >
14.06< / >
6816.58< / >
< / >
| 食品与饮料< / >
AEP Plantations< / >
154.00< / >
1.20< / >
229.00< / >
126.00< / >
3.92< / >
8.93< / >
424.76< / >
Barr (AG)♦< / >
592.00< / >
-2.00< / >
715.32< / >
538.00< / >
3.22< / >
14.01< / >
101.90< / >
Fevara< / >
151.50< / >
-1.50< / >
160.00< / >
114.50< / >
1.58< / >
6.56< / >
36.12< / >
Coca-Cola HBC< / >
4766.00< / >
-42.00< / >
5195.00< / >
3406.00< / >
2.10< / >
22.06< / >
546.59< / >
Cranswick< / >
5370.00< / >
-60.00< / >
5810.00< / >
4775.00< / >
2.09< / >
18.15< / >
68.59< / >
Diageo♦< / >
1763.00< / >
-42.50< / >
1903.91< / >
1295.50< / >
2.11< / >
30.28< / >
3708.38< / >
Greencore< / >
296.00< / >
-4.20< / >
307.50< / >
191.10< / >
0.88< / >
22.42< / >
1092.84< / >
Kerry Group♦< / >
8261.01< / >
-34.42< / >
8395.41< / >
5567.81< / >
1.46< / >
24.74< / >
89.97< / >
Tate & Lyle< / >
563.00< / >
-2.00< / >
580.00< / >
319.40< / >
3.52< / >
25.59< / >
577.62< / >
Unilever< / >
4857.00< / >
-44.00< / >
5542.11< / >
3644.00< / >
3.29< / >
13.44< / >
3895.67< / >
| 医疗保健设备与服务< / >
|
GN Store Nord< / >
1194.70< / >
8.21< / >
1429.97< / >
984.75< / >
15.76< / >
304.64< / >
Smith&Nephew+< / >
1117.50< / >
12.50< / >
1426.59< / >
980.40< / >
2.63< / >
20.79< / >
5706.12< / >
| 住宅、休闲与个人用品< / >
Barratt Redrow+< / >
319.00< / >
-15.60< / >
406.50< / >
235.40< / >
1.88< / >
23.46< / >
5727.72< / >
Bellway< / >
2246.00< / >
-46.00< / >
2890.00< / >
1715.00< / >
3.34< / >
13.52< / >
672.50< / >
Berkeley< / >
3644.00< / >
4.00< / >
4442.00< / >
2796.00< / >
10.99< / >
148.02< / >
Burberry Group< / >
1063.00< / >
-2.50< / >
1376.50< / >
953.40< / >
2059.99< / >
Cairn Homes< / >
233.50< / >
1.50< / >
251.00< / >
163.99< / >
3.72< / >
13.14< / >
727.29< / >
Games Workshop+< / >
15790.00< / >
-130.00< / >
23540.00< / >
15200.00< / >
3.55< / >
25.30< / >
90.36< / >
Gleeson (MJ) +< / >
287.50< / >
7.50< / >
435.00< / >
221.00< / >
1.74< / >
-86.60< / >
68.50< / >
McBride+< / >
169.80< / >
0.20< / >
214.10< / >
107.60< / >
1.83< / >
9.59< / >
169.55< / >
Philips< / >
2144.53< / >
98.21< / >
2413.42< / >
1790.38< / >
3.31< / >
-51.40< / >
5619.60< / >
PZ Cussons< / >
96.80< / >
-0.30< / >
114.00< / >
65.09< / >
3.82< / >
20.60< / >
290.20< / >
Fidelity Euro | 414.00< / > -1.00< / > 447.50< / > 367.50< / > 2.46< / > 437.18< / > -5.12< / > |
Fidelity Spec< / > 466.00< / > -3.50< / > 479.50< / > 385.54< / > 2.22< / > 482.23< / > -2.97< / >< / >
Finsbury G&I< / > 854.00< / > -4.00< / > 865.00< / > 706.25< / > 2.46< / > 928.70< / > -7.49< / >< / >
The Gbl Small Co< / > 188.20< / > -0.40< / > 198.60< / > 162.72< / > 1.67< / > 198.16< / > -4.69< / >< / >
GRIT(susp)< / > 1.25< / > —< / > 1.25< / > —< / > 14.40< / > -91.32< / >< / >
Hansa< / > 332.00< / > -10.00< / > 348.00< / > 256.00< / > 1.33< / > 540.41< / > -39.07< / >< / >
Hansa A< / > 326.00< / > -1.00< / > 340.00< / > 244.30< / > 1.35< / > 540.41< / > -40.17< / >< / >
Hen FarEs< / > 245.50< / > -2.50< / > 281.50< / > 229.00< / > 10.22< / > 231.26< / > 4.95< / >< / >
Hen High Inc< / > 207.00< / > -1.00< / > 214.00< / > 173.25< / > 5.37< / > 219.95< / > -5.61< / >< / >
[...OMITTED...]
html
Smlr | 980.00< / > -7.00< / > 998.00< / > 769.00< / > 2.96< / > 1087.51< / > -9.18< / > < / > |
Herald< / > 2760.00< / > -10.00< / > 3250.73< / > 2285.00< / > —< / > 3136.62< / > -13.73< / > < / >< / >
HICL Infra< / > 135.80< / > —< / > 141.00< / > 107.20< / > 6.26< / > 161.00< / > -16.63< / > < / >< / >
Impax Env< / > 428.50< / > -1.50< / > 494.76< / > 379.00< / > 1.21< / > 488.29< / > -11.33< / > < / >< / >
IntBiotech< / > 1035.00< / > —< / > 1235.00< / > 812.00< / > 3.03< / > 1017.85< / > -4.28< / > < / >< / >
Intl PP< / > 140.80< / > —< / > 145.80< / > 115.60< / > 6.24< / > 154.34< / > -10.18< / > < / >< / >
Inv Asia Dragon Tst< / > 462.50< / > -4.50< / > 520.00< / > 400.00< / > 4.15< / > 497.42< / > -8.50< / > < / >< / >
Inv Bond Inc< / > 164.50< / > -0.50< / > 177.50< / > 150.11< / > 7.45< / > 162.13< / > 1.37< / > < / >< / >
JPM Amer IT< / > 1214.00< / > -2.00< / > 1260.00< / > 1041.00< / > 0.95< / > 1245.72< / > -3.17< / > < / >< / >
JPM Asia G&I< / > 506.00< / > -8.00< / > 652.00< / > 428.32< / > 6.52< / > 525.00< / > -4.45< / > < / >< / >
JPM China G&I< / > 223.00< / > -2.00< / > 307.00< / > 219.00< / > 5.11< / > 243.74< / > -9.93< / > < / >< / >
JPM Clavr< / > 930.00< / > -14.00< / > 986.00< / > 804.00< / > 3.92< / > 973.17< / > -3.97< / > < / >< / >
JPM Emrg EMEA< / > 233.50< / > -1.50< / > 310.00< / > 196.00< / > 0.26< / > 66.70< / > 249.26< / > < / >< / >
JPM Emrg< / > 153.00< / > -1.40< / > 181.20< / > 130.41< / > 4.92< / > 163.73< / > -9.12< / > < / >< / >
JPM Eur Disc< / > 608.00< / > -3.00< / > 666.00< / > 548.00< / > 2.63< / > 668.34< / > -8.89< / > < / >< / >
JPM Eur G&I< / > 134.00< / > -0.80< / > 153.00< / > 124.50< / > 4.06< / > 141.50< / > -5.30< / > < / >< / >
JPM Em Mk Div< / > 192.00< / > -3.00< / > 223.00< / > 160.00< / > 3.12< / > 209.27< / > -9.50< / > < / >< / >
JPM Gbl G&I< / > 595.00< / > -3.50< / > 641.00< / > 529.60< / > 4.17< / > 604.32< / > -1.83< / > < / >< / >
JPM India Gwth Inc< / > 868.00< / > 6.00< / > 1088.00< / > 799.00< / > 4.88< / > 942.72< / > -9.28< / > < / >< / >
JPM Japan< / > 788.00< / > -5.00< / > 867.00< / > 683.00< / > 1.10< / > 859.63< / > -9.03< / > < / >< / >
JPM UK Sm< / > 358.50< / > —< / > 369.00< / > 287.92< / > 4.16< / > 389.50< / > -7.71< / > < / >< / >
JPM US Sml< / > 431.00< / > 3.00< / > 463.00< / > 365.00< / > 0.74< / > 471.69< / > -9.88< / > < / >< / >
Law Deb< / > 1178.00< / > -6.00< / > 1290.00< / > 991.00< / > 3.10< / > 1218.24< / > -2.63< / > < / >< / >
[...OMITTED...]< / > < / >< / >
Train | 590.00< / > -6.00< / > 744.00< / > 529.50< / > 4.75< / > 7.15< / > -18.04< / > < / > |
Lowland< / > 188.00< / > -0.50< / > 191.50< / > 149.50< / > 3.66< / > 206.09< / > -8.83< / > < / >< / >
Marwyn Val< / > 142.00< / > —< / > 144.00< / > 140.00< / > 6.38< / > 267.05< / > -46.82< / > < / >< / >
Mercantile< / > 281.50< / > —< / > 290.50< / > 234.31< / > 2.95< / > 311.17< / > -9.60< / > < / >< / >
Merch. Trst< / > 673.00< / > -5.00< / > 691.00< / > 555.00< / > 4.44< / > 718.22< / > -6.17< / > < / >< / >
Mid Wynd< / > 820.00< / > 2.00< / > 836.00< / > 682.00< / > 1.05< / > 834.93< / > -2.37< / > < / >< / >
Monks IT< / > 1570.00< / > -12.00< / > 1696.00< / > 1366.00< / > 0.06< / > 1653.37< / > -5.20< / > < / >< / >
Montanaro Eur< / > 175.50< / > -1.00< / > 189.00< / > 142.00< / > 0.88< / > 192.39< / > -8.20< / > < / >< / >
Murray Inc.< / > 994.00< / > -5.00< / > 1036.00< / > 854.66< / > 4.12< / > 1071.95< / > -7.07< / > < / >< / >
Murray Intl< / > 368.00< / > -1.50< / > 376.00< / > 303.50< / > 3.48< / > 365.49< / > 0.55< / > < / >< / >
New Star IT< / > 139.00< / > -2.00< / > 148.00< / > 118.00< / > 2.55< / > 202.73< / > -30.44< / > < / >< / >
N. Atl Smlr IT< / > 420.00< / > -1.00< / > 434.00< / > 328.00< / > 1.67< / > 658.99< / > 2< / >< / >
Pacific Horiz.< / > 961.00< / > -18.00< / > 1262.00< / > 719.00< / > —< / > 1053.96< / > 7< / >< / >
Pers. Assets< / > 552.00< / > -1.00< / > 561.00< / > 515.00< / > 1.01< / > 557.33< / > 0.83< / >< / >
Polar Health< / > 458.00< / > 4.50< / > 471.16< / > 352.11< / > 0.48< / > 448.72< / > 2.05< / > < / >< / >
|
< rowspan="2">< / > | 52周< / >< / >
价格< / > 日变化< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 市盈率< / > 成交量(千股)< / >< / >
BP Marsh< / > 720.00< / > 8.00< / > 727.00< / > 613.00< / > 5.04< / > 29.30< / > 5.43< / >< / >
Burford Capital< / > 281.60< / > 6.80< / > 764.50< / > 215.60< / > 3.35< / > 434.50< / > 13.03< / >< / >
Premier Miton Group< / > 28.75< / > -0.75< / > 60.60< / > 28.50< / > 10.43< / > 314.69< / > 36.86< / >< / >
| 食品与饮料< / >< / >
Camellia< / > 5475.00< / > 125.00< / > 6300.00< / > 4800.00< / > 4.75< / > -29.33< / > 0.04< / >< / >
Fevertree Drinks< / > 921.00< / > -22.50< / > 973.00< / > 711.00< / > 1.89< / > 49.04< / > 497.67< / >< / >
Nichols< / > 1070.00< / > —< / > 1200.00< / > 880.00< / > 3.64< / > 22.77< / > 18.24< / >< / >
| 家居、休闲与个人用品< / >< / >
Churchill< / > 370.00< / > —< / > 460.00< / > 271.00< / > 5.68< / > 4.80< / > 9.32< / >< / >
Frontier Dev< / > 506.00< / > -9.00< / > 659.00< / > 302.00< / > —< / > 107.21< / > 6.78< / >< / >
Portmeirion< / > 44.50< / > —< / > 105.00< / > 44.00< / > —< / > 18.01< / > -0.98< / >< / >
Sanderson Design Corp*< / > 72.40< / > -0.10< / > 80.00< / > 40.00< / > 2.07< / > 129.29< / > 24.30< / >< / >
| 工业工程< / >< / >
MS Intl< / > 1675.00< / > -5.00< / > 1800.00< / > 1120.00< / > 1.55< / > 5.79< / > 24.85< / >< / >
|
《金融时报》股票服务部分帮助您与全球范围内的金融决策者和富裕股东进行联系与互动,在纸质版和在线平台上展开。
公司名称 / 变动幅度 / 当前价格 / 最高价 / 最低价 / 市盈率 / 交易量(百万股) / 市值(亿英镑)
---------------- / ---------- / --------- / -------- / ------------------ / ----------------
Reach / 1247.18 / 25.01 / 46.80 / 0.20 / 73.70 / -1.12 / 1360.05
Relx■ / -46.00 / 2952.00 / 3448.50 / 1991.00 / 2.33 / 26.22 / 2522.23
Rightmove / 4.80 / 538.40 / 677.60 / 391.40 / 2.00 / 19.16 / 1320.84
STV Group / -3.00 / 99.00 / 122.10 / 90.94 / - / -9.17 / 8.71
| 采矿业 | Anglo American / -107.00 / 3717.00 / 4643.80 / 2639.00 / 0.78 / -15.08 / 8530.53
Antofagasta / -115.00 / 3138.00 / 4475.00 / 2496.00 / 1.86 / 31.23 / 797.82
BHP Group / -86.00 / 2919.00 / 3592.00 / 1971.00 / 4.31 / 20.23 / 1067.82
Ferrexpo / 0.06 / 31.72 / 87.23 / 25.22 / - / -1.12 / 562.75
Fresnillo / -51.00 / 2286.00 / 4472.00 / 2102.00 / 4.89 / 16.33 / 556.87
Glencore■ / -14.70 / 504.30 / 707.20 / 332.20 / 2.51 / - / 27312.02
Harmony / 5.05 / 1154.06 / 1963.66 / 946.96 / 4.98 / 11.11 / 2302.22
Rio Tinto■ / -118.00 / 6078.00 / 9117.00 / 5159.00 / 5.73 / 13.29 / 1990.99
BP■ / -10.70 / 589.30 / 638.54 / 413.30 / 4.34 / - / 62821.97
Capricorn / - / 424.00 / 450.00 / 181.80 / - / 20.31 / 13.96
ExxonMobil Hldgs / - / 13274.20 / 13438.90 / 13215.30 / 2.40 / -
GeoPark / - / 776.71 / 784.91 / 771.50 / 0.88 / 12.71 / -
Helleniq Energy / - / 1399.37 / 1424.40 / 1370.16 / 3.58 / 5.76 / 474.45
Imperial Oil C$ / 25.27 / 10021.00 / 10383.70 / 6229.98 / 1.85 / - / 203.44
TC Energy Corp / - / 4763.86 / 4791.03 / 4710.58 / 3.93 / -25.56 / 799.78
AstraZeneca■ / -100.00 / 13760.00 / 15732.00 / 9892.00 / 1.74 / 27.97 / 2536.67
Chemical Works / - / 2965.62 / 2947.26 / 5.06 / 15.52 / 0.01
GlaxoSmithKline■ / 3.00 / 1827.50 / 2282.00 / 1690.00 / 3.83 / 12.95 / 5019.74
Hikma Pharm / -5.00 / 1743.00 / 1845.00 / 1187.00 / 3.68 / 12.85 / 271.16
REITs | 英国土地公司< / > 431.00< / > -5.60< / > 451.60< / > 335.40< / > 5.36< / > -< / >< / > 德文特伦敦< / > 1919.00< / > -27.00< / > 2196.00< / > 1469.33< / > 4.27< / > -< / >< / > 大波特兰地产< / > 346.80< / > -5.20< / > 377.00< / > 270.00< / > 2.36< / > -< / > 0.00< / >< / > 地产信托< / > 675.00< / > -9.00< / > 726.00< / > 525.00< / > 6.10< / > -< / >< / > 伦敦度量地产< / > 186.10< / > -1.50< / > 216.20< / > 170.20< / > 6.74< / > -< / >< / > 普里马里健康地产< / > 95.60< / > -0.55< / > 109.60< / > 88.30< / > 7.64< / > -< / >< / > 塞格罗< / > 909.00< / > -5.80< / > 997.40< / > 632.20< / > 3.47< / > -< / >< / > 舍夫茨伯里资本< / > 148.00< / > -1.90< / > 155.10< / > 124.10< / > 2.91< / > 7.91< / > 1424.07< / >< / > 特里塔克斯大型仓储< / > 147.70< / > -0.80< / > 175.00< / > 138.50< / > 5.59< / > -< / > | 房地产投资与服务< / >< / > 格雷恩杰< / > 183.90< / > -2.00< / > 202.79< / > 149.44< / > 4.57< / > -< / >< / > 哈沃斯集团< / > 188.60< / > -2.40< / > 207.00< / > 116.80< / > 0.97< / > 65.03< / > 127.53< / >< / > 赫利卡尔< / > 191.50< / > 1.50< / > 225.75< / > 170.50< / > 1.37< / > 39.65< / > 121.51< / >< / > 马特维尔地产< / > 8625.00< / > -< / > 9750.00< / > 8350.00< / > 6.09< / > 16.52< / > 0.27< / >< / > 塞维尔斯< / > 1132.00< / > -8.00< / > 1160.00< / > 791.46< / > 2.08< / > 21.77< / > 258.37< / >< / > 西拉斯地产< / > 99.00< / > -0.45< / > 113.00< / > 85.85< / > 5.39< / > 7.83< / > 2721.24< / >< / > 斯马特(J)< / > 110.00< / > -< / > 140.00< / > 105.00< / > 2.95< / > 8.42< / > -< / > |
< rowspan="2">< / > | 52周< / >< / > | 价格变动 / 日涨跌< / > 最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 市盈率< / > 成交量(千股)< / >< / > | 媒体< / >< / > 任务集团< / > 27.00< / > -< / > 29.00< / > 12.00< / > -< / > -1.27< / > -< / >< / > | 采矿< / >< / > 中亚金属< / > 125.80< / > -2.80< / > 244.00< / > 125.00< / > 12.32< / > -3.97< / > 1966.09< / >< / > 克里姆治疗< / > 8.75< / > -< / > 18.50< / > 8.00< / > -< / > -1.72< / > 139.62< / >< / > | 石油与天然气< / >< / > 博斯斯坦石油< / > 10.00< / > -0.20< / > 14.00< / > 7.26< / > -< / > -83.85< / > 40.97< / >< / > | 制药与生物科技< / >< / > 萨雷姆控股< / > 15.50< / > 0.25< / > 40.00< / > 11.75< / > -< / > -6.46< / > 701.83< / >< / > | 零售商< / >< / > 布胡群组< / > 26.25< / > 0.50< / > 29.50< / > 10.30< / > -< / > -3.39< / > 125577.00< / >< / > CVS集团< / > 1367.00< / > 7.00< / > 1428.00< / > 1062.00< / > 0.66< / > 56.02< / > 346.16< / >< / > | 其他< / >< / > 任务集团< / > 2< / > -< / > 52< / > 29.00< / > 12.00< / > 2< / > 7< / >< / >
| < rowspan="2">价格< / > | 日涨跌< / > | 52周< / >< ="2">分红-溢价< / > |
最高< / > 最低< / > 收益率< / > 净资产价值(NAV)< / >< / >
Polar Fin.< / > 233.00< / > -2.50< / > 260.50< / > 200.66< / > —< / > 246.61< / > -4.74< / >< / >
Polar Tech.< / > 583.50< / > -10.50< / > 743.50< / > 428.19< / > —< / > 626.27< / > -8.43< / >< / >
Rights & Iss IT< / > 2460.00< / > -20.00< / > 2560.00< / > 1965.13< / > 1.84< / > 3112.37< / > -18.83< / >< / >
RIT Cap.< / > 2445.00< / > -5.00< / > 2645.00< / > 2050.00< / > 1.84< / > 3186.50< / > -24.05< / >< / >
Ruffer Inv Pr< / > 294.50< / > —< / > 319.00< / > 281.26< / > 2.10< / > 305.85< / > -3.68< / >< / >
Schdr AsiaPac< / > 752.00< / > -12.00< / > 892.00< / > 641.35< / > 1.73< / > 832.00< / > -11.13< / >< / >
Schdr AsiaTotal< / > 626.00< / > -15.00< / > 746.00< / > 542.40< / > 1.84< / > 663.69< / > -6.75< / >< / >
Schroder Inc< / > 365.00< / > -2.00< / > 380.00< / > 315.00< / > 4.19< / > 390.18< / > -6.33< / >< / >
Schdr Japan< / > 362.00< / > 1.00< / > 402.53< / > 293.66< / > 3.69< / > 399.18< / > -9.70< / >< / >
Schdr Orient.< / > 427.00< / > -3.00< / > 478.00< / > 319.02< / > 3.09< / > 443.02< / > -5.57< / >< / >
Schdr UK Mid< / > 786.00< / > —< / > 790.00< / > 652.00< / > 2.88< / > 839.40< / > -5.98< / >< / >
Scot American< / > 555.00< / > -3.00< / > 572.00< / > 480.10< / > 2.95< / > 601.89< / > -7.84< / >< / >
Scot Mortgage< / > 1499.50< / > -13.50< / > 1652.50< / > 1015.74< / > 0.30< / > 1634.32< / > -8.11< / >< / >
Scot Oriental< / > 250.50< / > -2.00< / > 295.00< / > 240.00< / > 1.36< / > 270.29< / > -10.07< / >< / >
Strategic Eq.< / > 386.00< / > -6.00< / > 415.00< / > 330.00< / > 1.17< / > 428.53< / > -9.52< / >< / >
Temple Bar< / > 430.00< / > -2.50< / > 435.00< / > 345.25< / > 3.63< / > 428.94< / > 0.44< / >< / >
Tetragon< / > 1170.29< / > 0.09< / > 1476.82< / > 892.96< / > 3.06< / > —< / > < / >< / >
TRIG< / > 80.40< / > 0.80< / > 81.00< / > 63.20< / > 9.39< / > 101.90< / > -22.06< / >< / >
UIL< / > 213.00< / > —< / > 214.90< / > 211.50< / > 3.76< / > 286.68< / > -27.37< / >< / >
Utilico Emer Mkts< / > 270.00< / > -2.00< / > 305.00< / > 253.00< / > 3.59< / > 295.67< / > -8.96< / >< / >
Worldwide Hlth< / > 393.00< / > 1.00< / > 401.50< / > 322.52< / > 0.61< / > 419.24< / > -7.47< / >< / >
|
< ="2">< / >< ="2">价格< / >< ="2">日涨跌< / >< ="2">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">P / E< / >< ="2">成交量(千股)< / >< / >
最高< / > 最低< / >< / >
< ="8">零售商< / >< / >
Caffyns< / > 475.00< / > —< / > 550.00< / > 350.00< / > 2.11< / > -11.67< / > —< / >< / >
Dunelm Group< / > 895.50< / > -8.50< / > 1172.00< / > 707.00< / > 7.87< / > 11.63< / > 439.06< / >< / >
Halfords Group< / > 253.00< / > -5.50< / > 284.50< / > 123.80< / > 3.56< / > 16.64< / > 381.61< / >< / >
Inchcape< / > 636.50< / > —< / > 895.00< / > 604.50< / > 5.28< / > 8.78< / > 883.07< / >< / >
JD< / > —< / >< / >
体育• | 94.36< / > -1.96< / > 96.40< / > 63.98< / > 1.35< / > 10.93< / > 8124.40< / > | 金飞凤(Kingfisher)< / > 362.80< / > -3.80< / > 372.30< / > 266.40< / > 3.42< / > 25.91< / > 3857.13< / >< / > 马克斯&斯宾塞(Marks & Spencer)< / > 414.20< / > -2.10< / > 429.40< / > 301.10< / > 1.01< / > 32.61< / > 8092.75< / >< / > 萨加(Saga)< / > 910.00< / > 7.00< / > 918.00< / > 234.50< / > --< / > 552.68< / >< / > 塞恩斯伯里(Sainsbury's)< / > 345.40< / > -5.10< / > 380.30< / > 293.70< / > 3.97< / > 19.97< / > 8320.34< / >< / > 特斯科(Tesco)< / > 538.60< / > -6.40< / > 622.50< / > 411.70< / > 2.74< / > 19.59< / > 8676.33< / > |
霍登木工(Howden Joinery)♦< / > 825.00< / > -10.00< / > 981.00< / > 713.00< / > 2.67< / > 16.77< / > 716.18< / >< / > 英特泰克(Intertek)< / > 5935.00< / > -5.00< / > 5940.00< / > 3519.42< / > 2.78< / > 27.21< / > 179.66< / >< / > 约翰逊服务(Johnson Service)♦< / > 150.00< / > -0.60< / > 172.10< / > 123.80< / > 3.33< / > 16.13< / > 776.69< / >< / > 米蒂集团(MITIE Group)< / > 209.80< / > 0.40< / > 214.00< / > 143.00< / > 2.14< / > 31.79< / > 862.60< / >< / > RS集团(RS Group)< / > 788.50< / > 3.00< / > 803.00< / > 541.50< / > 2.90< / > 22.79< / > 771.43< / >< / > VP< / > 505.00< / > 8.00< / > 598.00< / > 420.00< / > 7.82< / > -36.59< / > 4.41< / > | 科技 - 软件与服务< / >< / > 计算中心(Computacenter)< / > 5045.00< / > 55.00< / > 6045.00< / > 2768.00< / > 1.55< / > 34.44< / > 195.97< / >< / > NCC集团(NCC Group)< / > 167.40< / > -2.20< / > 178.80< / > 107.20< / > 2.78< / > 29.89< / > 463.51< / >< / > 塞奇集团(The Sage Group)< / > 1159.00< / > -20.00< / > 1198.50< / > 771.66< / > 1.94< / > 30.71< / > 1177.86< / >< / > 三角集团(Triad Group)< / > 390.00< / > 5.00< / > 430.00< / > 236.00< / > 2.31< / > 39.31< / > 2.59< / >< / > | 电信< / >< / > 非洲艾尔特(Airtel Africa)< / > 263.60< / > -3.80< / > 436.20< / > 252.00< / > 2.08< / > 19.01< / > 2598.20< / >< / > BT集团(BT Group)< / > 222.90< / > -4.80< / > 242.09< / > 173.00< / > 3.73< / > 20.26< / > 17449.59< / >< / > 电信加(Telecom Plus)< / > 918.00< / > 7.00< / > 1886.00< / > 638.00< / > 5.45< / > 9.07< / > 148.78< / >< / > 沃达丰(Vodafone)< / > 117.20< / > 0.35< / > 132.07< / > 85.24< / > 3.38< / > -85.12< / > 24879.72< / >< / > | 烟草< / >< / > 英国美孚烟草(Brit Amer Tobacco)< / > 4529.00< / > -45.00< / > 5326.00< / > 3744.00< / > 5.41< / > 12.90< / > 2147.18< / >< / > 帝国香烟(Imperial Brands)< / > 2937.00< / > -42.00< / > 3632.04< / > 2408.00< / > 5.68< / > 11.70< / > 2118.86< / >< / > | 旅游与休闲< / >< / > 易捷航空(easyJet)< / > 679.80< / > -< / > 685.07< / > 332.60< / > 1.94< / > 10.33< / > 3816.28< / >< / > 第一集团(FirstGroup)< / > 234.40< / > 2.20< / > 236.00< / > 152.10< / > 3.07< / > 10.95< / > 3063.11< / >< / > 富勒斯(Fullers 'A')< / > 812.00< / > 2.00< / > 826.00< / > 602.00< / > 2.61< / > 20.70< / > 71.47< / >< / > 国际连锁酒店(IntContl Hotels)< / > 12690.50< / > -84.81< / > 13305.06< / > 9132.00< / > 1.11< / > 34.68< / > 208.30< / >< / > 国际消费航空(Intl Cons Air)< / > 417.30< / > -0.60< / > 492.90< / > 332.70< / > 1.59< / > 7.01< / > 11403.72< / >< / > 惠特布雷德(Whitbread)< / > 2780.00< / > -28.00< / > 2909.00< / > 2098.00< / > 3.49< / > 22.55< / > 696.90< / >< / >
Drax集团 |
862.50< / >
53.50< / >
937.50< / >
699.50< / >
3.51< / >
41.67< / >
1917.61< / >
|
国家电网< / >
1240.50< / >
-11.50< / >
1428.50< / >
1096.50< / >
3.91< / >
18.94< / >
9036.19< / >
< / >
彭农集团< / >
339.20< / >
-7.20< / >
548.21< / >
307.57< / >
8.64< / >
19.33< / >
2137.66< / >
< / >
塞文特伦特水务< / >
3260.00< / >
-48.00< / >
3335.00< / >
2381.00< / >
3.87< / >
26.40< / >
451.71< / >
SSE< / >
2581.00< / >
-21.00< / >
2767.50< / >
1843.00< / >
2.66< / >
24.46< / >
1796.66< / >
|
< rowspan="2">< / >
< rowspan="2">价格< / >
日涨跌< / >
| 52周< / >
收益率< / >
市盈率< / >
成交量(千股)< / >
最高< / >
最低< / >
| 支持服务< / >
克里斯蒂●< / >
150.00< / >
—< / >
199.60< / >
90.00< / >
2.67< / >
29.53< / >
17.59< / >
LonSec< / >
3650.00< / >
—< / >
3900.00< / >
2100.00< / >
2.66< / >
18.81< / >
NWF●< / >
161.00< / >
180.00< / >
110.00< / >
5.40< / >
8.66< / >
58.65< / >
Petards< / >
8.50< / >
12.50< / >
7.05< / >
-12.69< / >
0.24< / >
Renew< / >
1060.00< / >
4.00< / >
1086.00< / >
821.00< / >
1.92< / >
17.19< / >
105.19< / >
| 科技——软件与服务< / >
牛津度量< / >
38.00< / >
1.30< / >
60.40< / >
27.50< / >
8.55< / >
-89.09< / >
420.79< / >
| 旅游与休闲< / >
游戏王国< / >
30.60< / >
0.30< / >
43.90< / >
28.65< / >
15.07< / >
26.43< / >
Jet2< / >
1453.00< / >
-11.00< / >
1612.00< / >
980.00< / >
1.16< / >
6.88< / >
422.99< / >
|

所有数据均为上一交易日收盘时的信息。公司分类基于FTSE使用的ICB分类体系。FTSE 100成分股以粗体显示。收盘价格以便士(pence)为单位表示,除非另有说明。最高价和最低价基于过去52周内的日内交易波动。价格 / 收益比(P / E)基于最新年度报告和财务报表,并更新至中期数据。P / E使用公司持续经营业务的稀释后每股收益计算。股息收益率基于收盘价和上一财政年度支付的股息,并更新至中期数据。股息收益率以净额显示;英国公司股息扣除10%税款,非英国公司股息为税前金额。最高价、最低价、股息收益率和P / E根据适当的资本变动进行调整。交易量为当日汇总的总量,四舍五入至最近的1,000股。每股净资产价值(NAV)和分拆分析仅供参考。折价和溢价基于最新累计公平净资产估计和收盘价计算。折价、溢价、总回购收益率(GRY)和障碍率(HR)相对于股价(SP)和HR相对于清算(WO)以百分比显示,NAV以便士表示。
All data is as of close of the previous business day. Company classifications are based on the ICB system used by FTSE. FSTE 100 constituents are shown in bold. Closing prices are shown in pence unless otherwise indicated. Highs & lows are based on intra-day trading over a rolling 52 week period. Price/earnings ratios (P/E) are based on latest annual reports and accounts and are updated with interim figures. P/E is calculated using the company's diluted earnings from continuing operations. Yields are based on closing price and on dividends paid in the last financial year and updated with interim figures. Yields are shown in net terms; dividends on UK companies are net of 10% tax, non-UK companies are gross of tax. Highs & lows, yields and PER are adjusted to reflect capital changes where appropriate. Trading volumes are end of day aggregated totals, rounded to the nearest 1,000 shares. Net asset value per share (NAV) and split analytics are provided only as a guide. Discounts and premiums are calculated using the latest cum fair net asset value estimate and closing price. Discounts, premiums, gross redemption yield (GRY) and hurdle rate (HR) to share price (SP) and HR to wipe out (WO) are displayed as a percentage, NAV in pence.
\- trading ex-dividend
列出的价格为参考,并相信在出版时为准确。ICE或《金融时报》不提供任何报价。《金融时报》不保证或担保信息的可靠性或完整性。不承担任何因依赖或使用信息而产生的损失的责任。
数据提供方:
《金融时报》股票服务是一项付费印刷列表服务,可能并未涵盖所有伦敦证券交易所上市公司。该服务可供所有上市公司使用,但需编辑部审核。新销售询问请发送邮件至data@ft.com。进一步信息请联系newspapers@ice.com。
[图片占位符]
市场与数据在此发生。
《金融时报》
[图片占位符]
www.cpgbl.com, Email: fundservices@cpgbl.com
道达·科克斯全球基金公司—新兴市场股票基金
Canaccord国际基金管理有限公司 | (JER)< / > |
4楼,37 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QA< / > < / >< / >
+44 (0) 1534 700 104 (国际) +44 808 169 7966 (英国)< / > < / >< / >
|
FCA认可—爱尔兰UCITS< / >< / >
< / >
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information.
Data provided by
The FT Share Service is a paid-for print listing service and may not be fully representative of all LSE-listed companies. This service is available to all listed companies, subject to the Editors discretion. For new sales enquiries please email data@ft.com. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com

Markets and data happen here.
FINANCIAL TIMES
www.ice.com

www.cpgbl.com, Email: fundservices@cpgbl.com
Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Emerging Markets Stock Fund
Atlantas Sicav | Canaccord International Fund Managers Limited | (JER) | 4th Floor at 37 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QA | +44 (0) 1534 700 104 (Int.) +44 808 169 7966 (UK) | FCA Recognised-Ireland UCITS |
[空白]
基金名称< / >< / >
EdenTree可持续英国股权机会基金A类(EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity Opportunities Fund A Inc)< / >< / >
ISIN< / >< / >
GB0008445982< / >< / >
申报价格(2026年30-10-2026)< / >< / >
339.80< / >< / >
股息收益率(2026年30-10-2026)< / >< / >
1.91< / >< / >
变动(2026年30-10-2026)< / >< / >
2.80< / >< / >
< / >
[EMPTY]


Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
阿尔特米斯:利润猎手
阿尔格布里斯投资
阿尔格布里斯 | 阿尔格布里斯核心意大利I(欧元)< / > €< / > 236.66< / > -< / > 2.36< / > 0.00< / > 25.59< / > 20.58< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯核心意大利R(欧元)< / > €< / > 218.18< / > -< / > 2.16< / > 0.00< / > 24.66< / > 19.68< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融信贷I(欧元)< / > €< / > 226.71< / > -< / > 0.25< / > 0.00< / > 3.99< / > 8.44< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融信贷I(英镑)< / > £< / > 201.27< / > -< / > 0.23< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融信贷I(美元)< / > $< / > 209.94< / > -< / > 0.24< / > 5.86< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融信贷R(欧元)< / > €< / > 190.40< / > -< / > 0.23< / > 0.00< / > 3.31< / > 7.79< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融股权B(欧元)< / > €< / > 376.70< / > -< / > 6.10< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融股权R(欧元)< / > €< / > 304.70< / > -< / > 4.91< / > 0.00< / > 23.49< / > 26.62< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融股权基金B(英镑)< / > £< / > 315.70< / > -< / > 5.11< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融股权基金B(美元)< / > $< / > 476.38< / > -< / > 7.72< / > 3.90< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融收入I(欧元)< / > €< / > 299.59< / > -< / > 2.07< / > 0.00< / > 13.18< / > 16.71< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融收入R(欧元)< / > €< / > 263.20< / > -< / > 1.80< / > 0.00< / > 12.17< / > 15.67< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融收入基金I(英镑)< / > £< / > 220.65< / > -< / > 1.53< / > 6.02< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯金融收入基金I(美元)< / > $< / > 252.18< / > -< / > 1.74< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯全球信贷机会I(欧元)< / > €< / > 151.66< / > -< / > 0.17< / > 0.00< / > 1.31< / > 5.08< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯全球信贷机会R(欧元)< / > €< / > 145.22< / > -< / > 0.16< / > 0.00< / > 0.74< / > 4.54< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯全球信贷机会I(英镑)< / > £< / > 151.49< / > -< / > 0.16< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯全球信贷机会I(美元)< / > $< / > 156.39< / > -< / > 0.18< / > 0.00< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯IG金融信贷I(欧元)< / > €< / > 118.74< / > -< / > 0.18< / > 0.00< / > 2.11< / > 6.30< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯IG金融信贷R(欧元)< / > €< / > 114.65< / > -< / > 0.17< / > 0.00< / > 1.60< / > 5.76< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯战略信贷基金R(欧元)< / > €< / > 114.09< / > -< / > 0.13< / > 0.00< / > 0.64< / > 4.15< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯全球精选股票B(欧元)< / > €< / > 143.33< / > -< / > 0.20< / > 0.00< / > 7.87< / > 13.07< / >< / >
阿尔格布里斯全球精选股票R(欧元)< / > €< / > 136.03< / > -< / > 0.18< / > 0.00< / > 6.48< / > 11.61< / >< / >
|
57 圣詹姆斯街,伦敦 SW1A 1LD 0800 092 2051 | 授权投资基金< / >< / >
Artemis 公司债券 I 累积类< / > 118.19< / > -< / > -0.12< / > 0.00< / > 4.68< / > 6.02< / >< / >
Artemis 全球收入 I 分红类< / > 231.34< / > -< / > -2.45< / > 0.00< / > 2.17< / > 0.50< / >< / >
Artemis 高收益 I 季度分红类< / > 74.34< / > -< / > 0.08< / > 0.23< / > 1.59< / > 2.45< / >< / >
Artemis 收益 I 分红类< / > 351.31< / > -< / > -0.30< / > 5.48< / > 10.27< / > 10.95< / >< / >
Artemis 月度分红 I 分红类< / > 98.93< / > -< / > -0.47< / > 0.00< / > 11.22< / > 11.87< / >< / >
Artemis 短期下行策略债券< / > 133.36< / > -< / > 0.21< / > 0.00< / > 5.71< / > 6.88< / >< / >
Artemis SmartGARP 欧洲股票 I 累积类< / > 948.76< / > -< / > -3.04< / > 0.00< / > 22.07< / > 24.94< / >< / >
Artemis SmartGARP 全球小盘股 I 累积类< / > 246.94< / > -< / > -2.37< / > 1.95< / > 11.88< / > 12.43< / >< / >
Artemis SmartGARP 全球新兴市场股票 I 累积类< / > 319.07< / > -< / > -4.75< / > 0.00< / > 31.60< / > 26.71< / >< / >
Artemis SmartGARP 全球股票 I 累积类< / > 771.30< / > -< / > -8.62< / > 0.00< / > 24.40< / > 23.78< / >< / >
Artemis SmartGARP 英国股票 I 累积类< / > 4663.25< / > -< / > 2.43< / > 2.41< / > 23.61< / > 22.44< / >< / >
Artemis 战略资产 I 累积类< / > 111.74< / > -< / > 0.18< / > 0.00< / > 3.83< / > 3.39< / >< / >
Artemis 战略债券 I 季度累积类< / > 124.93< / > -< / > 0.11< / > 4.46< / > 5.79< / > 6.39< / >< / >
Artemis 英国精选基金 I 累积类< / > 1434.94< / > -< / > 4.20< / > 0.00< / > 7.56< / > 18.60< / >< / >
Artemis 英国中小盘股 I 累积类< / > 2733.83< / > -< / > 6.74< / > 1.81< / > 5.97< / > 9.99< / >< / >
Artemis 英国特殊情况 I 累积类< / > 1250.94< / > -< / > 2.55< / > 0.00< / > 12.91< / > 14.92< / >< / >
Artemis 美国扩展Alpha I 累积类< / > 576.11< / > -< / > -7.45< / > 0.00< / > 13.15< / > 16.73< / >< / >
Artemis 美国精选 I 累积类< / > 560.28< / > -< / > -5.82< / > 0.00< / > 20.62< / > 22.55< / >< / >
Artemis 美国中小盘股 I 累积类< / > 500.17< / > -< / > -1.45< / > 0.00< / > 18.51< / > 19.76< / >< / >
|
ARTEMIS The PROFIT HUNTER
Algebris Investments |

www.asbc.com | ASB SUKUK - ACC< / > $ 102.51< / > -< / > 0.09< / > 0.00< / >< / > ASB SUKUK - DIST< / > $ 94.61< / > -< / > 0.08< / > 0.50< / > 0.00< / >< / > ASB State Street Global Equity< / > $ 124.40< / > -< / > 1.89< / > 0.00< / >< / > ASB Global Technology< / > $ 154.95< / > -< / > -2.54< / > 0.00< / >< / > ASB MENA Equity< / > $ 92.32< / > -< / > 0.86< / > 0.00< / > | 其他国际基金< / >< / > American Dynamic< / > $ 9374.01< / > -< / > 150.98< / > 0.00< / >< / > American One< / > $ 11153.21< / > -< / > -74.45< / > 0.00< / > 10.31< / > 14.44< / >< / > Bond Global< / > € 1670.42< / > -< / > 4.14< / > 0.00< / > -0.19< / > 8.28< / >< / > Eurocroissance< / > € 1401.92< / > -< / > 34.86< / > 0.00< / >< / > Far East< / > $ 1218.80< / > -< / > 5.56< / > 0.00< / > |


蓝鲸增长美元策略(Blue Whale Growth USD T)< / > $< / > 20.73< / > -< / > -0.85< / > 0.00< / > |
平衡策略(Balanced Strategy)< / > £< / > 1.17< / > -< / > -0.01< / > 0.00< / > 10.43< / > 10.38< / >< / > 平衡策略A(Balanced Strategy A)< / > £< / > 1.17< / > -< / > -0.01< / > 1.84< / > 7.52< / > 8.00< / >< / > 谨慎平衡策略(Cautious Balanced Strategy)< / > £< / > 1.47< / > -< / > -0.01< / > 0.91< / > 8.26< / > 8.46< / >< / > 谨慎平衡策略A(Cautious Balanced Strategy A)< / > £< / > 1.05< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 1.84< / > 6.03< / > 6.69< / >< / > 增长策略(Growth Strategy)< / > £< / > 2.64< / > -< / > -0.01< / > 0.76< / > 0.53< / > 4.80< / >< / > 增长策略A(Growth Strategy A)< / > £< / > 1.26< / > -< / > -0.01< / > 0.54< / > 9.08< / > 10.00< / >< / > 高增长策略(High Growth Strategy GBP)< / > £< / > 3.87< / > -< / > -0.02< / > 0.24< / > 12.86< / > 13.54< / >< / > 高增长策略A(High Growth Strategy A)< / > £< / > 1.33< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 0.52< / > 10.97< / > 11.31< / >< / > 高收益债券基金B(月度)(High Income Bond Fund B Monthly)< / > £< / > 0.97< / > -< / > 0.00< / >< / > 高收益债券基金B(季度)(High Income Bond Fund B Quarterly)< / > £< / > 0.98< / > -< / > 0.00< / >< / > 美元增长策略(US$ Growth Strategy)< / > $< / > 2.53< / > -< / > -0.01< / > 0.21< / > 13.30< / > 13.90< / > |
交易日常规费用:A类无初始费用,其他类别最高2%。
Candriam投资者集团 | (LUX)< / > | FCA认可< / >< / >
Candriam绝对回报平衡股票市场中性-C类< / > €< / > 229.95< / > -< / > 0.09< / > 0.00< / > -0.42< / > 1.05< / >< / >
Candriam债券欧洲高收益资本-C类< / > €< / > 1427.21< / > -< / > 2.06< / > 0.00< / > 2.63< / > 5.39< / >< / >
Candriam债券全球高收益-C类< / > €< / > 285.89< / > -< / > 0.34< / > 0.00< / > 1.92< / > 5.16< / >< / >
Candriam债券全球通胀保护抵押-I类< / > €< / > 165.83< / > -< / > -0.33< / > 0.00< / > 1.18< / > 2.64< / >< / >
Candriam债券总回报-C类< / > €< / > 143.59< / > -< / > 0.36< / > 0.00< / > 1.35< / > 3.04< / >< / >
Candriam多元化期货-I类< / > €< / > 13613.90< / > -< / > -48.63< / > 0.00< / > 1.57< / > -0.44< / >< / >
Candriam股票澳大利亚-C类(澳元计价)< / > A$< / > 2364.02< / > -< / > 15.61< / > 0.00< / > 2.74< / > 7.67< / >< / >
Candriam股票新兴市场-C类< / > €< / > 1412.94< / > -< / > -28.34< / > 0.00< / > 25.26< / > 22.93< / >< / >
Candriam生物科技股票-C类< / > $< / > 1340.57< / > -< / > -20.74< / > 0.00< / > 21.04< / > 22.76< / >< / >
Candriam欧洲创新股票-R类< / > €< / > 278.37< / > -< / > 2.09< / > 0.00< / > -5.38< / > 1.56< / >< / >
Candriam指数套利-C类< / > €< / > 1538.05< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 0.74< / > 1.90< / >< / >
Candriam长短信贷-R类< / > €< / > 120.39< / > -< / > -0.03< / > 0.00< / > 2.66< / > 3.63< / >< / >
Candriam风险套利-C类< / > €< / > 2764.28< / > -< / > 0.50< / > 0.00< / > 3.12< / > 3.77< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展债券新兴市场分红< / > $< / > 758.42< / > -< / > 1.37< / > 0.00< / > 1.92< / > 3.25< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展欧洲公司债券-R类< / > €< / > 110.59< / > -< / > 0.15< / > 0.00< / > 1.21< / > 4.12< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展全球高收益-I类< / > €< / > 1245.85< / > -< / > 1.49< / > 0.00< / > 1.36< / > 4.29< / >< / >
Candriam经济主题股票-C类< / > $< / > 162.63< / > -< / > 1.38< / > 0.00< / > 2.12< / > 7.19< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展气候行动-I类< / > $< / > 2080.84< / > -< / > 6.39< / > 0.00< / > 10.12< / > 13.87< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展新兴市场股票-C类< / > €< / > 172.12< / > -< / > -2.98< / > 0.00< / > 21.40< / > 19.58< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展欧元区股票-C类< / > €< / > 216.78< / > -< / > 1.34< / > 0.00< / > 6.77< / > 10.43< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展欧洲大中盘股票-I类< / > €< / > 2529.19< / > -< / > 29.36< / > 0.00< / > -1.47< / > 2.84< / >< / >
Candriam可持续发展全球股票-C类< / > €< / > 47.42< / > -< / > -0.28< / > 0.00< / > 12.27< / > 15.51< / >< / >
新约克人寿全球高收益公司债券-R类< / > $< / > 173.10< / > -< / > 0.16< / > 0.00< / > 3.76< / > 6.75< / >< / >
|
其他国际基金 | Candriam 债券 欧元短期资本< / > €< / > 2185.41< / > -< / > 0.05< / > 0.00< / > 1.34< / > 2.69< / >< / > Candriam 债券信用机遇< / > €< / > 221.46< / > -< / > 0.22< / > 0.00< / > 2.07< / > 3.34< / >< / > Candriam 债券 新兴市场-C 资本< / > $< / > 3015.23< / > -< / > 2.09< / > 0.00< / > 3.38< / > 8.89< / >< / > Candriam 权益 L 欧洲优先 -I 资本< / > €< / > 262.62< / > -< / > 1.56< / > 0.00< / > 5.89< / > 6.12< / >< / > Candriam 权益 L 全球防御 R 资本< / > €< / > 395.93< / > -< / > -1.64< / > 0.00< / > 11.21< / > 14.77< / >< / > Candriam 权益 L 重大疾病 -I 资本< / > $< / > 3727.26< / > -< / > -28.53< / > 0.00< / > 8.50< / > 13.42< / >< / > Candriam 权益 L 机器人与创新技术 I 资本< / > $< / > 7309.78< / > -< / > -149.87< / > 0.00< / > 33.18< / > 32.44< / > |
CG资产管理有限公司< / > (IRL)< / >< / > 20 King Street, 伦敦 EC2V 8EG< / > < / >< / > 交易:Tel +353 1434 5098 传真 +353 1542 2859< / > < / >< / > FCA认证< / > < / > | CG投资组合基金 PLC< / >< / > 绝对回报 M 类< / > £< / > 141.20< / > -< / > -0.18< / > 2.61< / > 1.87< / > 1.69< / >< / > 资本杠杆投资组合 GBP P< / > £< / > 38757.68< / > -< / > -47.81< / > 1.95< / > 1.91< / > 1.64< / >< / > 资本杠杆投资组合 GBP V< / > £< / > 188.50< / > -< / > -0.23< / > 1.94< / > 1.92< / > 1.64< / >< / > 美元基金 Cis D 类< / > £< / > 147.12< / > -< / > -0.34< / > 2.82< / > -2.66< / > -3.32< / >< / > 美元对冲 GBP 类< / > £< / > 90.44< / > -< / > -0.23< / > 2.54< / > -0.97< / > -1.28< / >< / > 实质回报 类 A 类< / > £< / > 176.48< / > -< / > -0.32< / > 2.55< / > -2.16< / > -3.19< / >< / > 英国指数挂钩债券 G 类< / > £< / > 102.93< / > -< / > -0.18< / > 2.10< / > -0.12< / > 0.00< / > |
特许资产管理(新加坡)有限公司
| 其他国际基金< / >< / > CAM-GTF VCC< / > $ 477779.20< / > 47779.20< / > 0.00< / > 0.49< / > 3.79< / >< / > CAM Gti VCC< / > $ 1617.07< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 20.88< / > 4.69< / >< / > RAIC VCC< / > $ 1.90< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 8.97< / > -1.66< / > |
基金< / > 申报价< / > 要约价< / > ±< / > 收益率< / > 24m< / > 36m< / >< / > 伊登树全球可持续政府债券< / > 96.07< / > -< / > 0.07< / > 3.18< / > 0.00< / >< / > 伊登树可持续欧洲股票 A 类< / > 482.40< / > -< / > 0.10< / > 1.90< / > 11.07< / > 12.69< / >< / > 伊登树可持续欧洲股票 B 类< / > 488.10< / > -< / > 0.10< / > 0.00< / > 11.08< / > 12.70< / >< / > 伊登树可持续全球股票 A 类< / > 452.80< / > -< / > 0.30< / > 0.53< / > 8.57< / > 8.80< / >< / > 伊登树可持续全球股票 B 类< / > 457.20< / > -< / > 0.30< / > 0.96< / > 8.56< / > 8.80< / >< / > 伊登树可持续管理收入< / > [...OMITTED...]< / >< / >
A | 138.80< / > -< / > 0.10< / > 4.10< / > 4.62< / > 4.13< / > |
伊登树可持续管理收入B< / > 150.60< / > -< / > 0.10< / > 4.07< / > 5.09< / > 4.55< / >< / >
伊登树可持续短期债券< / > 94.83< / > -< / > -0.03< / > 4.64< / > -0.05< / > 0.75< / >< / >
伊登树可持续英镑债券A< / > 83.05< / > -< / > -0.09< / > 5.16< / > -1.34< / > 0.00< / >< / >
伊登树可持续英镑债券B< / > 95.97< / > -< / > -0.09< / > 5.16< / > -0.74< / > 0.61< / >< / >
伊登树可持续英国股票A< / > 260.70< / > -< / > 0.80< / > 1.73< / > 6.75< / > 5.13< / >< / >
伊登树可持续英国股票B< / > 260.20< / > -< / > 0.80< / > 2.08< / > 4.95< / > 5.11< / >< / >
伊登树可持续英国股票对冲A< / > 334.60< / > -< / > 1.50< / > 1.45< / > 3.81< / > 6.32< / >< / >
伊登树可持续英国股票对冲B< / > 341.80< / > -< / > 1.50< / > 1.89< / > 3.77< / > 6.30< / >< / >
伊登树可持续< / > 7< / > -< / >< / >
CP全球资产管理(新加坡)有限公司
| 国际共同基金< / >< / > CP多策略基金< / > $< / > 472.42< / > -< / > 0.23< / > 0.00< / > 12.01< / >< / >
|
CP资产管理有限公司
| 国际共同基金< / >< / > CP双重目的基金< / > $< / > 221.14< / > -< / > -0.06< / > 0.00< / >< / >
CP全球阿尔法基金< / > $< / > 515.60< / > -< / > -0.15< / > 0.00< / > 11.29< / >< / >
CPS-Master私人基金< / > $< / > 624.24< / > -< / > -0.02< / > 0.00< / > 11.18< / >< / >
|
基金名称 / 货币 / 净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 1年变化 / 3年变化
--------------------------------------- / ---------- / ------------
Emerging Markets Stock Fund A USD Acc / $ / 14.90 / - / 0.06 / 0.00 / 20.82 / 20.29
Emerging Markets Stock Fund A GBP Acc / £ / 15.71 / - / 0.05 / 0.00 / 18.26 / 17.61
Emerging Markets Stock Fund D GBP Dis / £ / 14.15 / - / 0.04 / 1.69 / 15.82 / 15.17
Emerging Markets Stock Fund A EUR Acc / € / 16.17 / - / 0.03 / 1.51 / 19.17 / 18.84
---
基金名称 / 货币 / 净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 1年变化 / 3年变化
--------------------------------------- / ---------- / ------------
Dodge & Cox Worldwide Times-Global Bond Times EUR Accumulating Class / € / 18.72 / - / -0.01 / 0.00 / 3.98 / 4.55
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond EUR Accumulating Class (H) / € / 12.06 / - / 0.02 / 0.00 / 3.40 / 3.87
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond EUR Distributing Class / € / 11.39 / - / -0.01 / 0.00 / -0.89 / -0.28
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond EUR Distributing Class (H) / € / 7.28 / - / 0.01 / 5.05 / -1.49 / -0.94
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond GBP Distributing Class / £ / 11.65 / - / 0.00 / 4.75 / -1.68 / -1.38
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond GBP Distributing Class (H) / £ / 8.27 / - / 0.01 / 4.70 / 0.35 / 0.61
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond USD Accumulating Class / $ / 15.12 / - / 0.03 / 0.00 / 5.40 / 5.86
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond CHF Distributing Class (H) / Sfr / 7.38 / - / 0.01 / 0.00 / -3.91 / -3.47
Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Global Bond Funds USD Accumulating Share Class / $ / 49.18 / - / 0.38 / 0.00 / 13.99 / 16.17
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond GBP Accumulating Share Class / £ / 60.30 / - / 0.37 / 0.00 / 11.56 / 13.55
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond EUR Accumulating Share Class / € / 65.98 / - / 0.35 / 0.00 / 10.72 / 12.47
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond USD Distributing Class / $ / 20.08 / - / 0.15 / 0.00 / 12.47 / 14.59
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -Global Bond CAD Accumulating Class / C$ / 64.94 / - / 0.62 / 0.00 / 15.06 / 17.15
---

Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund USD Accumulating Share Class / $ / 60.60 / - / 0.39 / 0.00 / 12.30 / 15.07
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund GBP Accumulating Share Class / £ / 70.28 / - / 0.35 / 0.00 / 9.92 / 12.48
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund GBP Distributing Share Class / £ / 40.89 / - / 0.21 / 0.00 / 9.09 / 11.59
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund EUR Accumulating Share Class / € / 70.20 / - / 0.29 / 0.00 / 6.55 / 11.00
Dodge & Cox Worldwide -US Stock Fund USD Distributing Class / $ / 22.17 / - / 0.14 / 0.00 / 11.47 / 14.14

授权投资基金 | 埃登树全球影响债券基金(EdenTree Global Impact Bond)< / > 85.17< / > -< / > -0.04< / > 4.31< / > -1.22< / > -0.07< / >< / > 埃登树绿色影响股权基金(EdenTree Green Impact Equity)< / > 132.90< / > -< / > 1.30< / > 0.95< / > 7.26< / > 8.73< / >< / > 埃登树绿色影响基础设施基金(EdenTree Green Impact Infrastructure)< / > 78.12< / > -< / > 0.61< / > 6.75< / > -2.66< / > -6.13< / > |


请访问 [www.royallondon.com](http: / www.royallondon.com) 获取详情
www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00
www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00


| 授权投资基金< / >< / > 基金史密斯股权T账户(Fundsmith Equity T Acc)< / > 735.71< / > -< / > 7.47< / > 0.00< / > 0.53< / > 4.51< / >< / > 基金史密斯股权T收入(Fundsmith Equity T Inc)< / > 664.02< / > -< / > 6.74< / > 0.00< / > 15.28< / > 14.34< / > |

| 吉尼斯全球投资者(Guinness Global Investors)< / >< / > 吉尼斯全球股息收入(GBP分红)(Guinness Global Equity Income Y GBP Dis)< / > £< / > 25.37< / > -< / > 0.13< / > 2.05< / > 7.65< / > 10.78< / >< / > 吉尼斯全球创新者(GBP累积)(Guinness Global Innovators Y GBP ACC)< / > £< / > 46.93< / > -< / > -0.15< / > 0.00< / > 14.91< / > 18.54< / >< / > 吉尼斯全球优质中型企业(GBP累积)(Guinness Global Quality Mid Cap Y Gbp Acc)< / > £< / > 15.83< / > -< / > 0.07< / > 0.00< / > 10.84< / > 10.58< / > |

基金 |
申报价< / >
要约价< / >
±< / >
收益率< / >
24个月< / >
36个月< / >
|
Janus Henderson多元化管理基金A累积型< / >
399.90< / >
-< / >
0.00< / >
1.40< / >
6.82< / >
7.50< / >
< / >
Janus Henderson多元化管理基金A分红型< / >
368.80< / >
-< / >
0.00< / >
1.20< / >
5.54< / >
6.10< / >
< / >
Janus Henderson英镑债券单位信托累积型< / >
227.00< / >
-0.20< / >
4.10< / >
1.61< / >
4.24< / >
Janus Henderson英镑债券单位信托分红型< / >
54.23< / >
-0.06< / >
4.10< / >
-0.93< / >
0.06< / >
Janus Henderson战略债券基金A分红型< / >
92.84< / >
0.08< / >
6.30< / >
-2.11< / >
-2.54< / >
Janus Henderson英国Alpha基金A累积型< / >
198.50< / >
0.10< / >
0.90< / >
10.98< / >
14.41< / >
Janus Henderson英国股票增长基金A分红型< / >
705.40< / >
-0.10< / >
3.40< / >
9.04< / >
10.92< / >
Janus Henderson美国成长基金A累积型< / >
2751.00< / >
-56.00< / >
12.76< / >
17.90< / > | 国际保险< / >
假日房产债券系列1< / >
£< / >
0.49< / >
-0.06< / >
假日房产债券系列2< / >
£< / >
0.66< / >
1.45< / >
1.19< / >
|
[图片占位符]
麦克罗伊与伍德
伊斯特·奥尔德斯顿,哈丁顿,EH41 3SF,01620 825867
| 英国认可投资基金< / >
平衡基金累积型< / >
7069.70< / >
26.50< / >
1.82< / >
4.91< / >
平衡基金分红型< / >
6636.60< / >
24.90< / >
1.86< / >
3.08< / >
2.98< / >
新兴市场基金累积型< / >
2131.60< / >
11.10< / >
1.91< / >
-1.43< / >
新兴市场基金分红型< / >
1909.30< / >
10.00< / >
1.95< / >
-3.23< / >
-4.30< / >
收入基金累积型< / >
3697.40< / >
3.80< / >
2.66< / >
7.32< / >
收入基金分红型< / >
3257.90< / >
3.40< / >
2.75< / >
4.17< / >
3.90< / >
小型公司基金累积型< / >
7331.50< / >
39.80< / >
1.26< / >
4.65< / >
小型公司基金分红型< / >
6866.10< / >
37.30< / >
1.28< / >
3.33< / >
3.76< / >
< ="7">爱尔兰认可投资基金< / >
< ="7">私人基金管理(格恩西)有限公司< / >
(GSY)< / >
< ="8">受监管< / >
纪念增长基金 27 / 10 / 2026< / >
619.54< / >
625.35< / >
1.04< / >
3.51< / >
3.28< / >

McInroy & Wood
Easter Alderston, Haddington, EH41 3SF, 01620 825867 |
< ="5">司法部共同投资基金< / >
(UK)< / >
< ="6">英国房地产及其他单位信托< / >
指数跟踪基金(分红型)< / >
2626.00< / >
-5.00< / >
2.00< / >
9.69 10.01< / >
< / >
分配单位< / >
< / >

McInroy & Wood
Easter Alderston, Haddington, EH41 3SF, 01620 825867 |
< ="7">授权公司董事-韦斯通管理(英国)有限公司< / >
全球总体基金PCG A< / >
689.12< / >
-0.82< / >
0.43< / >
12.75< / >
16.57< / >
全球总体基金PCG B< / >
678.21< / >
-0.81< / >
12.66< / >
16.49< / >
全球总体基金PCG INT< / >
661.24< / >
-0.79< / >
12.48< / >
16.30< / >
普里西马投资基金(CI)有限公司 | (JER)< / > | 受监管< / > < / >< / > PCG B< / > 560.07< / > -< / > -5.19< / > 0.00< / > 14.36< / > 18.80< / >< / > PCG C< / > 540.19< / > -< / > -5.00< / > 0.00< / > 14.11< / > 18.53< / > |

| 授权投资基金< / >< / > 皇家伦敦可持续多元化A类份额< / > 281.30< / > -< / > 0.40< / > 1.55< / > 3.61< / > 5.37< / >< / > 皇家伦敦可持续世界A类份额< / > 498.30< / > -< / > -1.90< / > 0.71< / > 9.28< / > 10.60< / >< / > 皇家伦敦企业债券月收入< / > 75.64< / > -< / > -0.03< / > 4.64< / > -0.35< / > 0.76< / >< / > 皇家伦敦欧洲增长信托< / > 279.70< / > -< / > -1.00< / > 1.15< / > 7.84< / > 8.73< / >< / > 皇家伦敦可持续领导者A类份额< / > 1010.00< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 1.50< / > 7.26< / > 7.08< / >< / > 皇家伦敦英国增长信托< / > 872.70< / > -< / > -0.90< / > 1.73< / > 10.51< / > 10.47< / >< / > 皇家伦敦英国增长与收入信托< / > 258.40< / > -< / > 0.20< / > 4.07< / > 7.44< / > 7.77< / >< / > 皇家伦敦美国增长信托< / > 646.10< / > -< / > -7.50< / > 0.01< / > 12.47< / > 15.90< / > | 授权投资基金< / >< / > 简·亨德森绝对回报基金A类账户< / > 207.20< / > -< / > 0.10< / > 2.10< / > 5.41< / > 6.36< / >< / > 简·亨德森亚洲股息收入单位信托< / > 93.76< / > -< / > -1.36< / > 5.50< / > 7.79< / > 6.53< / >< / > 简·亨德森谨慎管理基金A类账户< / > 355.50< / > -< / > -0.40< / > 3.90< / > 6.19< / > 7.98< / >< / > 简·亨德森谨慎管理基金A类收入< / > 150.90< / > -< / > -0.20< / > 4.00< / > 2.48< / > 2.81< / >< / > 简·亨德森中国机会基金A类账户< / > 1212.00< / > -< / > 6.00< / > 0.10< / > 10.39< / > 6.71< / >< / > 简·亨德森新兴市场亚洲A类账户< / > 1607.00< / > -< / > -32.00< / > 0.00< / > 21.55< / > 18.79< / >< / > 简·亨德森新兴市场机会基金A类账户< / > 266.90< / > -< / > -5.70< / > 0.00< / > 12.39< / > 10.31< / >< / > 简·亨德森欧洲焦点基金A类账户< / > 573.80< / > -< / > -1.90< / > 0.10< / > 0.00< / >< / > 简·亨德森欧洲选择机会基金A类账户< / > 3079.00< / > -< / > -10.00< / > 0.30< / > 10.04< / > 10.73< / >< / > 简·亨德森固定收益月收入基金收入< / > 16.57< / > -< / > 0.02< / > 6.50< / > -1.03< / > -1.08< / >< / > 简·亨德森全球股票收入基金收入< / > 84.81< / > -< / > -0.37< / > 2.60< / > 7.66< / > 7.49< / >< / > 简·亨德森全球选择基金账户< / > 6192.00< / > -< / > -79.00< / > 0.00< / > 6.91< / > 12.45< / >< / >
Inc | 690.50< / > -< / > 0.70< / > 0.00< / > 7.36< / > 10.81< / > |
Janus Henderson Global Tech Ldrs Fnd A Acc< / > 6386.00< / > -< / > -127.00< / > 0.00< / > 17.31< / > 22.29< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Instl UK Index Opps A Acc< / > 177.88< / > -< / > -0.43< / > 2.40< / > 15.99< / > 15.03< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Multi-Asset Abs Rtn Fd A Acc< / > 191.30< / > -< / > 0.10< / > 2.10< / > 4.93< / > 4.74< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Actv Fd A Acc< / > 331.70< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 1.70< / > 7.24< / > 7.97< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Dist Fd A Inc< / > 134.90< / > -< / > -0.10< / > 2.60< / > 2.65< / > 2.53< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Div. Fd A Acc< / > 105.30< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 3.20< / > 5.22< / > 7.43< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Glibl Sel Fd A Acc< / > 429.60< / > -< / > -1.60< / > 0.00< / > 7.54< / > 9.50< / >< / >
Janus Henderson MultMgrInc&Gwth Fd A Acc< / > 229.10< / > -< / > -0.30< / > 2.60< / > 5.78< / > 6.05< / >< / >
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Inc&Gwth Fd A Inc< / > 159.00< / > -< / > -0.20< / > 2.60< / > 2.80< / > 2.85< / >< / >
| Nutshell资产管理有限公司< / > (爱尔兰)< / >< / >
| Nutshell资产管理有限公司,Ivybridge House,1-5 Adam Street,伦敦 WC2N 6LE
www.nutshellam.com< / >< / >
| 授权投资基金< / >< / >
Nutshell Growth Fund Gbp 机构创始人< / > £< / > 177.80< / > -< / > -0.85< / > 0.00< / > 11.61< / > 14.03< / >< / >
Nutshell Growth Fund Gbp 机构创始人< / > £< / > 177.88< / > -< / > -0.43< / > 2.40< / > 15.99< / > 15.03< / >< / >
|



3楼,中央广场,威灵顿街,利兹 LS1 4DL
订单与咨询电话:0345 601 9610
基金名称 / 单位净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 3年平均年化收益率
--------------------------------------- / -------------- / ------------- / ---------------------------
| Waystone管理(英国)有限公司 | WS Ruffer Total Return C Acc / 595.00 / - / 0.00 / 2.13 / 3.28 / 3.58
WS Ruffer Total Return C Inc / 343.24 / - / 0.00 / 2.16 / 2.28 / 0.96
---
Oasis Crescent全球投资基金(英国)ICVC / 国家 / 基金名称 / 单位净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 3年平均年化收益率
-------------------------------------------- / ----------- / --------------------------------------------------- / -------------- / ------------- / ---------------------------
(UK) / Oasis Crescent Global Eq Fd (USD) A (Dist) / $55.36 / - / -0.06 / 0.00 / 16.75
Oasis Crescent Global Inc Fd (USD) A Dist / $10.04 / - / -0.02 / 0.00 / -0.27
Oasis Crescent Low Equity Fund (USD) D Dist / $15.96 / - / 0.03 / 0.00 / 9.12
Oasis Crescent Med Equity Fd (USD) A Dist / $18.60 / - / 0.04 / 0.00 / 10.88
Oasis Crescent Prop Equity Fd (USD) A Dist / $10.65 / - / 0.13 / 0.00 / 8.83
Oasis Crescent Short Term Inc Fd (USD) A (Dist) / $0.95 / - / 0.00 / 0.47
Oasis Crescent Variable Fund (USD) A (Dist) / £11.91 / - / 0.04 / 0.00 / 6.00
---
SICO BSC BHR / 电话 / 网站
------------------------------------------- / -------------------------------
+973 1751 5700 / [www.sicobank.com](http: / www.sicobank.com)
基金名称 / 单位净值 / 日变化 / 周变化 / 月变化 / 年变化 / 3年平均年化收益率
--------------------------------------- / -------------- / ------------- / ---------------------------
Khaleej Equity Fund / $549.96 / - / -33.51 / 0.00 / -2.83
Sico Gulf Equity Fund / $202.34 / - / 3.72 / 0.00 / 8.97
SICO Capital KSA / 国家 / 电话 / 网站
(KSA) / +966 11521 3835 / [www.sicocapital.com](http: / www.sicocapital.com)
SICO Kingdom Equity Fund / SAR 10.28 / - / -0.39 / 0.00 / 1.39
SICO MENA Equity Fund / SAR 21.34 / - / -0.39 / 0.00 / -1.37
SICO Capital Money Market / SAR 14.07 / - / -0.15 / 0.00 / - / 6
Stonehage Fleming投资管理有限公司 / 国家 / 网站 / 邮箱
(IRL) / [www.stonehagefleming.com / gbi](http: / www.stonehagefleming.com / gbi) / enquiries@stonehagefleming.com
SF Global Best Ideas Eq B USD Acc / $299.01 / - / 2.11 / 0.00 / 4.07 / 6.13
SF Global Best Ideas Eq D GBP Inc / £338.12 / - / 1.88 / 0.00 / 1.87 / 3.74
3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL
Order Desk and Enquiries: 0345 601 9610 |




报价 买入 变动 24 小时收益 36 个月收益
基金名称 / 报价 / 买入 / 变动 / 24 小时收益 / 36 个月收益
---------------------------------- / ---------------- / ---------- / ------------------
Troy Asset Management (1200) / (UK)
| 3 楼,中央广场,威灵顿街,利兹 LS1 4DL | 订单台及咨询电话:0345 608 0950 | 授权投资基金 | 授权公司董事:Waystone Management (UK) Limited
其他国际基金 / 报价 / 买入 / 变动 / 24 小时收益 / 36 个月收益
---------------------------------- / ---------------- / ---------- / ------------------
Superfund Trend Gold / $ 1672.64 / - / -10.76 / 0.00 / 24.20 / 24.42
Superfund Trend Silver / $ 1577.75 / - / 13.24 / 0.00 / 31.80 / 30.43
Superfund Trend / $ 784.87 / - / -19.94 / 0.00 / 11.87 / 6.63
Superfund Bitcoin 0-2x / € 87.71 / - / -1.42 / 0.00 / 3.72 / 6.55
Superfund Fund-of-Funds / $ 164.83 / - / 0.00 / 20.40 / 19.87
| 受监管基金 | Superfund Blockchain / € 19.24 / - / -1.36 / 0.00 / -2.86 / 19.43
Superfund Gold Silver + Mining / € 16.64 / - / -0.79 / 0.00 / 14.53 / 18.27
Superfund Quadriga All Seasons / € 14.55 / - / -0.26 / 0.00 / 12.76 / 15.24
Superfund Inflation / Sfr 11.01 / - / -0.07 / 0.00 / 9.09 / 7.10
Trojan 投资基金 / 报价 / 买入 / 变动 / 24 小时收益 / 36 个月收益
Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Acc / 117.58 / - / 0.35 / 2.90 / 1.38 / 4.28
Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Inc / 102.90 / - / 0.31 / 2.97 / -0.97 / 1.98
Trojan Ethical O Acc / 159.83 / - / 0.21 / 0.67 / 6.28 / 7.19
Trojan Ethical O Inc / 154.30 / - / 0.21 / 0.67 / 5.60 / 6.24
Trojan Ethical Income O Acc / 177.49 / - / 0.57 / 2.44 / 7.23 / 9.44
Trojan Ethical Income O Inc / 133.55 / - / 0.43 / 2.53 / 4.40 / 6.54
Trojan Fund Acc / 468.87 / - / 0.85 / 0.80 / 5.80 / 6.44
Trojan Fund Inc / 367.19 / - / 0.67 / 0.88 / 7.54 / 5.01
Trojan Global Income O Acc / 180.88 / - / 0.10 / 3.21 / 3.51 / 5.77
Trojan Global Income O Inc / 133.36 / - / 0.07 / 3.30 / 0.31 / 2.50
Trojan Income O Acc / 419.79 / - / 1.05 / 2.65 / 1.87 / 4.97
Trojan Income O Inc / 184.96 / - / 0.47 / 2.74 / 3.13 / 5.00
管理公司:Universal Investment Ireland
这些页面上刊登的基金价格由基金运营商、基金经理和基金管理人提供。刊登在这些页面上的基金详情(包括价格)仅供参考,仅作为指南使用。英国《金融时报》有限公司不对其准确性或完整性做出任何保证,投资者在做出投资决策时不应依赖这些信息。在某些司法管辖区,这些页面上列出的基金利益的销售可能受到法律限制,且基金可能不会在所有发行刊物流通的司法管辖区内可用。有疑问者应咨询适当的专业建议。数据由ICE收集。本期刊登的基金价格及额外信息也可在《金融时报》网站([www.ft.com / funds](http: / www.ft.com / funds))上查阅。这些页面上的基金按基金管理公司分组。价格以基金货币为单位(如未特别说明)。如有显示,变动数字是相对于上次刊登的价格(非所有基金每日更新价格)。标有“$”且无前缀的基金价格指美元。收益率百分比(周二至周六刊登的报纸)考虑了购买费用。
OEIC:开放式投资公司(Open-Ended Investment Company)。类似于单位信托,但使用公司结构而非信托结构。不同的股份类别反映不同的货币、收费结构或持有人类型。
买入价(Bid price):也称为卖出价(selling)。单位信托中投资者出售单位的价格。
卖出价(Offer price):也称为买入价(buying)。单位信托中投资者购买单位的价格,包括经理的初始收费。
单一价格(Single price):基于基础资产的中间市场估值。OEIC股份和单一定价单位信托的买入和卖出价格相同。经理定期资本收费的处理方式:24个月和36个月:基于该期间的总收益(或损失)计算的年化绩效数字(7个月及以下的绩效未提供)。绩效公式调整以考虑参考期间内的收入分配。
收益率(Yield):使用基金预计年收入除以最新可用净资产价值计算。
特洛伊基金(爱尔兰)有限公司(Trojan Funds (Ireland) Plc) | 特洛伊欧洲O欧元累积类(Trojan Europe O EUR Acc)< / > €< / > 1.0431< / > -< / > 0.00< / >< / >
特洛伊排除X英镑累积类(Trojan Exclusions X GBP Acc)< / > £< / > 1.3372< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 6.43< / >< / >
特洛伊全球股票O英镑累积类(Trojan Global Equity O GBP Acc)< / > £< / > 6.2537< / > -< / > 0.04< / > 0.20< / > 1.08< / >< / >
特洛伊(爱尔兰)O英镑累积类(Trojan (Ireland) O GBP Acc)< / > £< / > 1.8847< / > -< / > 0.00< / > 6.22< / >< / >
|
价格以基金货币为单位(如未特别说明)。标有“$”且无前缀的基金价格指美元。
某些较旧的保险相关计划的价格可能在销售时受到资本利得税的影响。
报纸上刊登的价格是由管理人 / 运营商提供的最新价格。
此广告服务的收费基于刊登的行数和基金的分类。如需进一步信息,请联系data@ft.com。其他查询请联系newspapers@ice.com
[⚠ 低质量翻译,建议复核]
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m | Troy Asset Management (1200) | (UK) | 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL | Order Desk and enquiries 0345 608 0950 | Authorised Inv Funds | Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited |
The fund prices quoted on these pages are supplied by the fund operators, fund managers and fund administrators. Details of funds published on these pages, including prices, are for the purpose of information only and should only be used as a guide. The Financial Times Limited makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness and they should not be relied upon when making an investment decision. The sale of interests in the funds listed on these pages may, in certain jurisdictions, be restricted by law and the funds will not necessarily be available to persons in all jurisdictions in which the publication circulates. Persons in any doubt should take appropriate professional advice. Data collated by ICE. The fund prices published in this edition along with additional information are also available on the Financial Times website, www.ft.com/funds. The funds published on these pages are grouped together by fund management company. Prices are in price unless otherwise indicated. The change, if shown, is the change on the previously quoted figure (not all funds update prices daily). Those designated \$ with no prefix refer to US dollars. Yield percentage figures (in Tuesday to Saturday papers) allow for buying expenses.
OEIC: Open-Ended Investment Company. Similar to a unit trust but using a company rather than a trust structure. Different share classes are issued to reflect a different currency, charging structure or type of holder.
Bid price: Also called selling price. The price at which units in a unit trust are sold by investors.
Offer price: Also called buying price. The price at which units in a unit trust are bought by investors. Includes manager's initial charge.
Single price: Based on a mid-market valuation of the underlying investments. The buying and selling price for shares of an OEIC and units of a single priced unit trust are the same. Treatment of manager's periodic capital charge: 24 and 36 months: 24 and 36 month annualized performance figures calculated using the total gain (or loss) from that period. Performance formula is adjusted to consider the income distribution during the reference period.
Yield: Calculating using the fund's projected annual income, divided by the latest available net asset value. |
The prices appearing in the newspaper are the most recent provided by the managers/operators.
Charges for this advertising service are based on the number of lines published and the classification of the fund. Please contact data@ft.com for further information. For further queries contact newspapers@ice.com

ice.com
Markets and data happen here.
www.ice.com


ARTS

艺术市场 / 查尔斯顿 —— 查尔斯顿(Sussex郡的艺术家家园)正在启动一项£15百万(£15mn)的筹款活动,以配合布卢姆斯伯里集团在英国艺术界的文化复兴。
首笔£1百万(£1mn)的捐款来自作家维吉尼亚·尼古拉斯(Virginia Nicholson)——画家范妮莎·贝尔(Vanessa Bell)的外孙女——以及她的丈夫,小说家和剧作家威廉·尼古拉斯(William Nicholson)。贝尔在1916年至1957年间在查尔斯顿居住和工作超过40年,与她的艺术家同伴、有时也是情人邓肯·格兰特(Duncan Grant)共同生活。其他常客包括贝尔的妹妹作家弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf),以及经济学家约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes),后者也是格兰特的情人之一。
查尔斯顿的筹款活动正逢布卢姆斯伯里集团在英国艺术界的兴起。著名剧作家詹姆斯·格雷厄姆(James Graham)的最新西区剧《生活标准》(The Standard of Living)探讨了凯恩斯在查尔斯顿期间对其影响力经济理论的贡献。下周,泰特英国美术馆(Tate Britain)将开展一场展览,展示贝尔和格兰特的创作伙伴关系,以及该集团“以自由和激进实验为中心的生活方式”如何重塑了英国的文化和思想。展览将包括重现查尔斯顿工作室的场景,借用该苏塞克斯庄园房间内保存的4,000个物品。
对于以祖母范妮莎·贝尔命名的维吉尼亚来说,“我见证了整个故事,我一生都了解查尔斯顿,我掌握着信托的历史记忆”,她说。这位社会史学家的第一部著作,与她的父亲昆廷·贝尔(Quentin Bell,范妮莎与克莱夫·贝尔的儿子)合著,详细记录了菲尔莱农场(Firle farmhouse)及其20世纪的历史(查尔斯顿:布卢姆斯伯里之家与花园,1997)。
威廉则表示:“查尔斯顿并非我的财产,我是通过婚姻加入其中,但它对我们的生活产生了非凡影响。”他以其特有的热情解释道,“它将有趣的人聚集在一起,你能真正与他们见面,而不是这种该死的数字生活。如果我希望任何事物能够延续,那么这就是我想要传承的。”
尼古拉斯夫妇的捐款“占了我们养老金的很大一部分,我们并不是超级富有”,威廉说。他补充道,“不过,我之前的薪水确实很高”,特别是他被聘为里德利·斯科特2000年史诗电影《角斗士》(Gladiator)的第三位应急剧本作家时。
他们希望能够鼓励其他人捐款。威廉的观点是,“在我看来,拥有一个基金会是很酷的,因为这意味着不朽,而不朽是很酷的”。这已经奏效:当我们在尼古拉斯夫妇的苏塞克斯家中见面时,他们得知英国时装设计师金·琼斯(Kim Jones,Bosideng Areal品牌的创意总监)刚刚匹配了他们的£1百万(£1mn)捐款,查尔斯顿自2017年以来的董事兼首席执行官纳撒尼尔·赫伯恩(Nathaniel Hepburn)确认了这一消息。
泰特美术馆的展览《范妮莎·贝尔与邓肯·格兰特:布卢姆斯伯里内部》(Vanessa Bell & Duncan Grant: Inside Bloomsbury)将进一步确立贝尔作为艺术家的声誉,她的外孙女认为。格兰特活得更长,并在其时代取得了成功,而贝尔“低估了自己,她倾向于——惊不惊喜——‘邓肯才是天才、杰出的艺术家,我只是他身后默默追随的女人’”,维吉尼亚说。她补充道:“范妮莎的艺术并非被邓肯·格兰特所掩盖,而是被弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫所掩盖。

The Art Market | Charleston has commenced a £15mn fundraising campaign as the group enjoys a cultural revival. By Melanie Gerlis
Charleston, the Sussex home and retreat of the bohemian Bloomsbury set, has commenced a £15mn fundraising campaign amid a resur-
gence of the group across the UK's arts scene.
The first £1mn for the charitable trust's endowment has come courtesy of the writer Virginia Nicholson – granddaughter of the painter Vanessa Bell – and her husband, the novelist and screenwriter William Nicholson. Bell lived and worked at Charleston for more than 40 years from 1916, alongside her fellow artist and sometime lover Duncan Grant. Other regulars included Bell's sister, the writer Virginia Woolf, and the economist John Maynard Keynes, another of Grant's lovers.
Charleston's fundraising coincides with a revival of interest in the Bloomsbury set. The latest West End play by celebrated writer James Graham, The Standard of Living, explores the impact of Keynes' time at Charleston on his influential economic theories. Next week, Tate Britain opens a show that charts the creative partnership between Bell and Grant and how their group's "commitment to living lives centred around freedom and radical experimentation" reshaped culture and thought in Britain. This will include a restaging of their Charleston studio, borrowing from among the 4,000 individual items maintained in the rooms of the Sussex house.
For Virginia, named after her great aunt and painted by both Bell and Grant, "I've seen the whole story, I've known Charleston all my life, I hold the historical memory of the Trust", she says. The social historian's first book, written in collaboration with her father Quentin Bell (Vanessa's son with Clive Bell), details the Firle farmhouse and its 20th-century history (Charleston: A
Clockwise from main: Charleston's eclectic interior; artist Vanessa Bell (c1910); painter and designer Duncan Grant (1957) — Lewis Ronald; George C. Beresford/Hulton Archive/Getty; John Hedgecoe/Popperfoto
Bloomsbury House & Garden, 1997). For William: “Charleston’s not mine, I’ve married into it, but it is extraordinary what it has done for our life.” With characteristic vim, he explains that “it brings together people who are interesting, and you actually meet them in real life, not this bloody digital life. If there is anything that I want to survive, then it’s that.”
The Nicholsons' donation represents "a huge chunk of our pension, we are not super-rich", William says. He adds, though, that "I was overpaid for quite a number of years", notably, he says, when brought in as an emergency third writer for Ridley Scott's 2000 epic film Gladiator.
The hope, they say, is to encourage others to donate. William's pitch is that "it seems to me that having an endowment is sexy, because it means immortality, and immortality is sexy". It has already worked: when we meet in the Nichols' Sussex family home, there is delight that the British fashion designer Kim Jones, creative director for Bosideng's Areal label, has just matched their £1mn, confirms Nathaniel Hepburn, director and chief executive of Charleston since 2017.
Tate's exhibition, Vanessa Bell & Duncan Grant: Inside Bloomsbury, will cement Bell's reputation as an artist, her granddaughter believes. Grant lived longer, and had success in his time, while Bell "underestimated herself, she tended towards – surprise, surprise – 'Duncan was the genius, the brilliant artist, I am just the woman trailing in his wake'," Virginia says. She adds: "Vanessa's art was not so much eclipsed by Duncan Grant, as by Virginia Woolf," who was
夏洛特(Charleston)作为1920年代的作家而闻名。
夏洛特的魅力已证明具有国际性,包括一群八人承诺在遗嘱中捐赠额外£2为基金会,赫普沃思(Hepburn)表示。其中包括一对美国同性恋夫妇,他们在夏洛特举办的首次约会地点,以及一位新墨西哥州的八旬老人,他经常参加夏洛特春季节庆。今年的两周系列讲座和活动中,包括被伊朗监禁近六年的伊朗裔英国作家纳扎宁·扎加里-拉特克利夫(Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe)、演员兼歌手奥利·亚历山大(Olly Alexander)和艺术家罗丝·威利(Rose Wylie)。
为了筹集设立基金会的法律费用,另一对夫妇出售了部分特斯拉股票,赫普沃思表示,他们不希望从中获利,并提到这家电动汽车制造商的首席执行官是埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)。“他们享受这种讽刺,用它来拯救一座精美绘制的、自由、同性恋者的房子在萨塞克斯乡村”,赫普沃思指出。
基金会的筹划始于夏洛特于1980年成立为慈善机构之时。“它总是被讨论过,但每次资金到来时,都急需用于其他地方,不得不被转移……我们一度从一个危机挣扎到另一个危机,持续了一段时间”,维吉尼亚(Virginia)表示,她是一位长期信托人,现任信托董事会主席。
尽管夏洛特被视为国家级珍宝,但它并未获得任何常规公共资金支持,而是依赖入场费(包括每月“付费自愿日”)、商店和咖啡厅的收入,以及会员费、场地租赁和一次性捐赠。去年的总收入为£4.5,支出为£4.3,根据慈善委员会(Charity Commission)的数据。
“直到最近几年,我们是一个季节性的遗产旅游景点,这不是艺术委员会或地方当局设立的支持对象”,赫普沃思解释道。现在,他表示:“我们是全年跨学科的……跨两个场地(他们在2023年开设了莱温斯文化中心),我们将向艺术委员会寻求收入支持。拥有一个基金并不会让慈善机构变得富有,我们无法动用这笔资金。我们仍然需要为学习项目、展览和活动筹集资金。”
赫普沃思还深陷“50 for 50”项目,以庆祝夏洛特作为慈善机构的50周年,于2030年。赫普沃思表示:“我们希望送出的两个生日礼物是一笔£15的基金和50件最重要、最激动人心的布卢姆斯伯里艺术品收藏,这些艺术品仍在私人所有。”这已经带来了一幅1911年罗杰·弗里(Roger Fry)为小说家E·M·福斯特(E M Forster)所绘的角度独特的肖像画,以及本周捐赠的一幅被认为是格朗特(Grant)为贝尔(Bell)最后的肖像画,一幅铅笔和圆珠笔画,画中贝尔闭目,日期为她死于支气管炎的1961年一周后。
这幅画的亲密和温情强调了夏洛特作为一个有意义关系的地方的神话,正如威廉(William)所言,“朝着一个所有知识都包含在计算机中的世界迈进”。维吉尼亚持相同观点:“当时的人们生活方式,正是人们现在希望并渴望的生活方式。”
夏洛特官网:[charleston.org.uk](http: / charleston.org.uk)
弗朗西斯·培根(Francis Bacon)
让·奥托(Jean Fautrier)
卢西安·弗洛伊德(Lucian Freud)
阿尔贝托·雅各布蒂(Alberto Giacometti)
理查德·汉密尔顿(Richard Hamilton)
莉莉安·利恩(Liliane Lijn)
马洛·莫斯(Marlow Moss)
爱德华多·帕洛齐(Eduardo Paolozzi)
热尔曼·里希耶(Germaine Richier)
尼基·德·圣法尔(Niki de Saint Phalle)
格雷厄姆·萨瑟兰(Graham Sutherland)
威廉·特纳布尔(William Turnbull)
acclaimed as a writer from the 1920s.
Charleston's appeal has proved international, including among a group of eight people who have promised gifts in their wills amounting to an additional £2mn for the endowment, Hepburn says. Among these donors, he says, are a gay couple in the US who had their first date at Charleston and “an octogenarian in New Mexico”, who comes regularly to the springtime Charleston Festival. This year’s line-up for the two-week series of talks and events included the Iranian-British author Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe (a prisoner in Iran for almost six years), the actor and singer Olly Alexander and the artist Rose Wylie.
To fund the legal costs of setting up the endowment, another couple cashed in some Tesla stock, “from which they didn’t want to benefit personally”, Hepburn says, referring to the electric-car maker whose chief executive is Elon Musk. “They enjoy the irony that this is being used to save a nicely painted, liberal, progressive, queer house in the Sussex countryside,” Hepburn notes.
The endowment has been in the planning since Charleston was founded as a charity in 1980. “It was always talked about, but every time money came in, it was so desperately needed elsewhere that it had to be diverted . . . We lurched from crisis to crisis for quite a while,” says Virginia, a longtime trustee and now president of the trust.
Despite being something of a national treasure, Charleston receives no regular public funding, relying on entrance fees (with monthly pay-what-you-can days) and its shop and café, as well as membership, venue hire and one-off donations. Total income last year was £4.5mn, with expenditure at £4.3mn, according to the Charity Commission.
“Until a certain number of years ago, we were a seasonal, heritage tourism site and that’s not what the Arts Council or local authorities are set up to support,” Hepburn explains. Now, he says: “We are interdisciplinary, all year round . . . across two sites [they opened a cultural centre in Lewes in 2023] and we will look to the Arts Council for revenue support. Having an endowment doesn’t make the charity rich, we can’t spend that money. We still need to fundraise for the learning programme, the exhibitions, the events.”
Hepburn is also in the thick of the “50 for 50” project, to mark Charleston’s 50th year as a charity in 2030. “The two birthday presents that we want to give are a £15mn endowment and a collection of 50 of the most important and exciting Bloomsbury pieces [of art] that are still in private ownership,” Hepburn says. This has already brought in an angular Roger Fry portrait of the novelist E M Forster (1911) and, this week, the donation of what is believed to be Grant’s final portrait of Bell, a pencil and biro drawing of her with her eyes closed, dated a week after she died of bronchitis in 1961.
The intimacy and tenderness of the drawing underlines Charleston's mythology as a place of meaningful relationships at a time, as William sees it, of "heading towards a world in which all knowledge is contained within a computer". Virginia is of a similar mind: "People lived then how people want and wish they lived now."
charleston.org.uk
Francis Bacon
Jean Fautrier
Lucian Freud
Alberto Giacometti
Richard Hamilton
Liliane Lijn
Marlow Moss
Eduardo Paolozzi
Germaine Richier
Niki de Saint Phalle
Graham Sutherland
William Turnbull
2026年9月—11日
奥尔多瓦斯(ORDOVAS)
[ORDOVASART.COM](http: / ORDOVASART.COM)
9 OCTOBER—11 DECEMBER 2026
ORDOVAS
ORDOVASART.COM
他们称之为“Fonzi”:一场涉及$20亿的金融丑闻,已摧毁了455,000土耳其人的储蓄,激怒了总统雷杰普·塔伊普·埃尔多安,并动摇了其政府的根基。
“Fonzi”或“Fonz”是1970年代美国情景喜剧《快乐时光》中穿着皮夹克的英雄角色。但土耳其的“Fonzi”泡沫破裂后,绝无“快乐可言”。相反,这是一场规模达$20亿的投资基金危机,其名称由“土耳其基金”(fon)和对庞氏骗局的暗示组成。全球源头合伙公司(GlobalSource Partners)的阿蒂拉·叶希拉达(Atilla Yesilada)表示:“国际上并未充分意识到发生的规模;这是全国性对话的主要话题。”
Fonzi丑闻动摇了土耳其已经岌岌可危的$1.8万亿加元经济,尽管安卡拉被北约盟友视为对抗中东动荡和俄罗斯复仇主义的重要防线。超过455,000零售投资者,被承诺1,000%回报的基金所吸引,面临着损失储蓄的风险。最关键的是,与伯纳德·马多夫(Bernard Madoff)的骗局不同,土耳其的Fonzi危机被指涉及政府最高层。
批评者,包括政府内部的一些人士,认为这反映了土耳其在埃尔多安执政24年后,中央集权统治下空心化的制度,以及任人唯亲的晚期症状——正当埃尔多安的政治接班人问题日益凸显之际。
危机爆发前数月,反对党议员在土耳其议会提出了一个尖锐的问题。土耳其的资本市场已成为“沼泽地”,艾尤泽·图尔克斯·塔什(Ayyüce Türkeş Taş)宣称,并指出投资者正通过“池化技术、自营交易和操纵”受到欺诈。她注意到,连土耳其财政部长也发出了类似的警告,并问为何没有采取行动。执政党正义与发展党(AKP)的议员们则将问题一扫而过。一名议员表示,市场扰动正被“坚决抵制”,埃尔多安的“土耳其世纪”愿景的“金融架构”是“牢固”的,并获得了政府席位上的欢呼。反对党提出的调查案被迅速否决。这段对话,记录在2025年12月的议会记录中。
几乎一年后,与丑闻牵连的政府高层人士名单每天都在扩大。
被逮捕并被羁押的包括:
调查涉及的指控范围包括贿赂、市场操纵、滥用职权以及参与犯罪组织。一些被告否认犯罪行为,而其他人则未对指控作出公开回应。其他高级官员则失去了职位。
土耳其资本市场监管机构(SPK)连续两任首脑被免职,其中一人称因健康原因;一名副财政部长在其女婿被捕后退休。距离政治顶层最近的是AKP副主席法特玛·贝图尔·赛扬·卡亚(Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya),她已辞职。
愤怒的埃尔多安表示危机正被“以外科手术般的精确度”处理。但党内干部和盟友们已被震撼到核心。
金融危机不是系统故障,也不是个别“坏苹果”的问题。沃朗戈·皮科利(Wolfango Piccoli)表示,他是一位长期关注土耳其局势的专家,也是顾问机构Consello的地缘政治风险负责人。他说道:“这正是系统实际运作的方式。这是一个制度退化的故事,是监管机构逐渐被削弱的结果。”
hey call it the Fonzi: a multi-billion-dollar financial scandal that has torched the savings of half a million Turks, enraged President
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and shaken his government to the core.
“Fonzie” or “The Fonz” was also the leather-jacketed hero of the 1970s US sitcom Happy Days. But there is nothing happy about the popping of Turkey’s Fonzi bubble. Instead, it is a \$20bn investment fund crisis, its name a mixture of the Turkish word for fund and a reference to Ponzi schemes. “The scale of what is going on is not fully appreciated internationally; this is the leading topic in national conversation,” says Atilla Yesilada of GlobalSource Partners, an Istanbul-based consultancy.
The Fonzi scandal has shaken confidence in Turkey's already struggling \$1.8tn economy, even as Ankara is viewed by Nato allies as an increasingly important bulwark against Middle East instability and Russian revanchism. Over 455,000 retail investors, who were sucked into funds with visions of 1,000 per cent returns, risk seeing their savings lost. Most important of all, and unlike other scandals such as Bernard Madoff's swindle, Turkey's Fonzi crisis is alleged to reach into the highest echelons of government.
To critics, including some within the administration, it is symptomatic of a late-stage cronyism that has hollowed out Turkish institutions after 24 years of increasingly centralised rule – just as questions about Erdoğan's political succession have come to the fore.
A foretaste of the scandal came months before it exploded, when an opposition lawmaker raised a pointed question in Turkey's parliament.
Turkey's capital markets have become “a quagmire”, Ayyüce Türkeş Taş declared, adding that investors were being defrauded through “pooling techniques, self-trading and manipulation”. She noted that even Turkey's finance minister had issued a similar warning and asked why no action was being taken. Her counterparts in the ruling Justice and Development Party, known in Turkish as the AKP, brushed the question aside. Market disruptions are being “resolutely combated”, one said. The “financial architecture” of Erdoğan's vision of a “Turkish century” is “solid”, he added, to cheers from government benches. An investigation proposed by the opposition was swiftly voted down. That exchange, recorded in parliamentary transcripts, took place in December 2025.
Almost a year later, the roll call of establishment figures caught up in the scandal grows virtually every day.
Among those arrested and remanded in custody are the former head of the Istanbul stock exchange; the former presidential adviser credited with devising Erdoğan's "Turkish century" election slogan; a former ambassador to the OECD; a former central bank deputy governor; and the former chief executive and deputy chief executive of Türkiye Sigorta, Turkey's largest non-life insurer, controlled by a sovereign wealth fund chaired by Erdoğan.
The investigations encompass allegations ranging from bribery and market manipulation to abuse of office and involvement in a criminal organisation. Some suspects have denied wrongdoing, while others have made no public response to the allegations against them. Other senior officials have lost their positions.
Two successive chiefs of Turkey's capital markets regulator, the SPK, have lost their jobs, one citing ill health, and a deputy finance minister has retired following the arrest of his son-in-law. Closest to the top of the political pile is the AKP's deputy chair, Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya, who has resigned.
A furious Erdoğan has said the crisis is being handled “with a surgeon’s precision”. But party cadres and allies have been shaken to the core.
The funds crisis is “not a malfunction of the system. Nor, obviously, is it a case of a few bad apples. This is how the system actually works,” says Wolfango Piccoli, a longtime Turkey watcher and head of geopolitical risk at Consello, an advisory group. “It’s a story of institutional degradation, of regulatory bodies that have slowly been hollowed out.”
阿利坎·莫尔达尔加是数十万土耳其人之一,他们现在后悔将自己的终身储蓄(他个人的情况是TL600万,折合$120,000)投入了“Fonzi”基金。像许多人一样,他曾看到由人物如53岁的特拉集团(Tera Group)创始人埃姆雷·特兹门(Emre Tezmen)推广的华丽宣传材料。他说道:“这些基金是受到监管的……它们不是地下运作。因此,我基于这一点信任了他们,就如同其他人在其他
Alican Mordalga is one of the hundreds of thousands of Turks who now rue putting their life savings, in his case some TL6mn (\$120,000), into one of the Fonzi funds. Like many others, he had seen the glossy promotional materials put about by personalities such as Emre Tezmen, the 53-year-old founder of Tera Group whose brokerage and investment funds lie at the centre of the scandal. “The funds were regulated . . . they weren’t some underground operations. So, I trusted them on that basis, just as people do in other
土耳其,“莫尔达尔加(Mordalga)”表示,“我无法想象有人会认为这样的事情会发生。”
特兹门(Tezmen),其父曾是20世纪90年代土耳其航空公司的董事长,于2005年创立了特拉集团(Tera),并将其打造成一个庞大的金融集团。该集团的经纪公司向潜在投资者展示的回报极为诱人。公司的展示材料称,其主力基金TLY在2025年回报率高达4,233%,而伊斯坦布尔股市同期仅增长13%。
调查人员现在正在审查的特拉集团运作,与金融史上的“泵和倾销”骗局极为相似,例如20世纪20年代华尔街臭名昭著的“池操作商”。
本质上,芬齐基金在相关公司中建立了高度集中的头寸,推高这些公司的股价,从而夸大基金自身的净资产价值。炫目的回报吸引了新投资者,为基金提供了新的资金,用于购买相同或相关的股票。
Özata Denizcilik(一家造船公司)的命运说明了这一机制。该公司于2024年上市,市值约为2000万加元,其中不到五分之一的股份在公开市场流通。4月份,特拉基金开始以约281土耳其里拉(TL)的价格累积Özata股票。到8月底,基金购买了该公司几乎96%的可流通股份,将股价推高至9月中旬的近5,000 TL,五个月内股价上涨了1,600%。
土耳其证券市场监管机构(SPK)已对11人,包括特兹门在内,提起刑事指控,指控他们涉嫌操纵Özata股票。目前被羁押的特兹门否认有罪。
土耳其市场部分显然已经疯狂,这并非秘密。土耳其金融稳定委员会(包括财政部长梅赫梅特·辛谢克和中央银行行长)去年12月讨论了这一问题。根据SPK后续发布的声明,委员会当时担忧“某些资产管理公司……正在引发无法用经济现实解释的价格波动”。
一些警告更为直接。拉马赞·巴萨克(Ramazan Başak),土耳其金融犯罪机构Masak的前副主任,表示他多次向当局警告可疑交易,但被忽视。巴萨克于4月被拘留,指控其散布“误导性信息”,因为他质疑特拉基金的天文数字回报。他随后获释,并否认有罪。
6月,指数提供商MSCI警告称,“协调性交易行为”可能扭曲股市价格。土耳其的聪明投资者目睹了这一幕。
泡沫在8月底末破裂,当时关于自由流通股份的监管变化将财富创造周期突然逆转。9月15日,投资经理Pusula Portföy表示,其部分基金无法满足投资者的赎回请求。警报迅速传播。其他投资者争相抛售,引发了全面的“基金挤兑”,市场崩盘。
“No Ponzi dies of natural causes. Either the regulators pull the trigger or investors do. In our case, it was the investors.” 经济学家凯里姆·罗塔(Kerim Rota)表示,他一直密切关注芬齐危机。作为Özata(造船商)股价下跌幅度的一个指标,该公司现在以170 TL交易,较其峰值下跌了98%。
在一个极其时机敏感的赌注中,凯亚(AKP副主席,后辞职)和她的丈夫在崩盘前出售了其持有的400,000股Özata股票。凯亚表示,她已自愿返还超过20亿里拉(约400,000加元)的股票交易利润,并否认获得内幕信息或犯有任何过错。
三家Özata董事(包括其董事长)已被移交看守所,作为Fonzi案(针对市场操纵的调查)的一部分。该公司表示,此类行动并不意味着有罪,并表示将在法庭上挑战这些拘留措施。
countries," Mordalga says. "I don't think anyone imagined something like this could happen."
Tezmen, son of a former politician who chaired Turkish Airlines in the 1990s, founded Tera in 2005 and built it into a sprawling financial group. The rewards that his brokerage dangled to prospective investors were extraordinary. Corporate presentations boasted that its main fund, TLY, returned 4,233 per cent in 2025 against just 13 per cent for the Istanbul stock market.
The Tera operations that investigators are now examining bear an uncomfortable resemblance to the “pump and dump” schemes of financial history, such as Wall Street’s notorious “pool operators” of the roaring 1920s.
In essence, Fonzi funds built up concentrated positions in related companies, bidding up their share prices and flattering the funds' own net asset values. Spectacular returns attracted new investors, providing fresh money for the funds to buy the same or related stocks.
The fortunes of Ōzata Denizcilik, a shipbuilding company, illustrate the mechanics. When it floated in 2024, with a market capitalisation of roughly \$200mn, less than a fifth of its shares were publicly traded. In April, Tera funds began accumulating Ōzata stock at around TL281. By late August, the funds had bought almost 96 per cent of Ōzata's available shares, squeezing its stock price up until it reached a peak of almost TL5,000 in mid-September — a 1,600 per cent return in five months.
The SPK, Turkey's capital markets regulator, has since filed criminal complaints against 11 people, including Tezmen, over suspected manipulation of Özata shares. Tezmen, now remanded in custody, denies wrongdoing.
That segments of the Turkish market had seemingly gone crazy was no secret. Turkey's Financial Stability Committee, which includes finance minister Mehmet Şimşek and the central bank chief, discussed the problem last December. Even then, according to a statement later issued by the SPK, the committee was concerned that “certain portfolio management companies . . . were causing price movements . . . that could not be explained by economic reality”.
Some warnings were more explicit still. Ramazan Başak, a former deputy head of Turkey's financial crimes agency Masak, says he repeatedly alerted the authorities to suspicious transactions but was ignored. Başak was detained in April on suspicion of spreading “misleading information” after he questioned some of Tera's astronomical returns. He was subsequently released and denies wrongdoing.
In June, index provider MSCI warned that “co-ordinated trading behaviour” might be distorting stock market prices. Savvy Turkish investors watched it happening in plain sight.
The bubble burst in late August, after a change in free-float regulations governing shares threw the cycle of wealth creation into sudden reverse. On September 15, investment manager Pusula Portföy said some of its funds could not meet investor redemption requests. The alarm quickly spread. Other investors rushed to sell, there was a full-blown “funds run” and the market tanked.
“No Ponzi dies of natural causes. Either the regulators pull the trigger or investors do. In our case, it was the investors,” says Kerim Rota, an economist who has closely followed the Fonzi crisis. As an indication of how far some share prices have fallen, Özata, the shipbuilder, now trades at TL170 – a 98 per cent fall from its peak.
In an extraordinarily well-timed bet, Kaya, the deputy AKP chair who has since resigned, and her husband, sold their 400,000 Ōzata shares before the crash. Kaya says she has since voluntarily returned more than TL2bn — about \$40mn — in gains from share trading and denies receiving inside information or committing any wrongdoing.
Three Özata directors, including its chair, have been remanded in custody as part of the broader Fonzi investigation into market manipulation. The company has said such moves do not constitute guilt and that it is ready to challenge the detentions in the courts.
土耳其当局现在面临如何最好地清理这场混乱局面的问题。在9月17日,即市场崩盘次日,金融稳定委员会采取了一系列紧急协调措施,包括冻结交易、清算总资产达$20亿的131只基金,以及由中央银行增加里拉流动性以限制强制性抛售。
财政部长希姆谢克表示:“我们已经将有问题的领域置于‘检疫’状态”,并补充称,这仅占土耳其投资基金部门的10%,并不是系统性威胁。他强调,关键在于没有出现投资者恐慌性抛售加元的情况,汇率保持稳定。
---
但随着事件的发展,两个核心问题仍然没有得到回答:为什么当局明知存在明显的股价操纵行为,却让泡沫持续膨胀了这么久?如果存在串谋,这场操纵涉及到系统的哪个层级?
随着消费者信心急剧下滑,10月单月下降了8%,一份据称交给埃尔多安的民调显示,执政党正义与发展党(AKP)的支持率在一个月内下降了6%,据前AKP议员沙米尔·泰亚尔透露。
下一次总统选举必须在2028年前举行。普遍认为,现年72岁的埃尔多安将设法再次参选。但宪法对总统连任第三届的限制,引发了猜测:谁最终可能接替埃尔多安执政?埃尔多安的忠实支持者、前总统发言人艾丁·乌纳尔暗示,这场丑闻可能是“针对埃尔多安的陷阱”,由“内部的对手”所设。
与此同时,独立记者面临日益加剧的压力。10月14日,警方以涉嫌另一起腐败调查为由,突袭了土耳其最受关注的新闻频道之一Halk TV。随后,一名国家任命的托管人被指派接管该频道,该频道曾广泛报道Fonzi丑闻。反对党领袖Özgür Özel称,Fonzi丑闻是“本世纪最大的盗窃案”,并表示:“只有独裁者在黎明时突袭电视台并任命托管人。当公众要求对基金丑闻问责时,他们却这样做。”
Turkish authorities now have to confront how to best clean up the mess. On September 17, the day after the market rout, the Financial Stability Committee responded with a co-ordinated series of emergency measures that included a freeze on trading, the liquidation of 131 funds with \$20bn of assets between them, and an increase in lira liquidity by the central bank to limit forced selling.
“We have placed the problematic area under quarantine,” said finance minister Şimşek, adding that it represented just 10 per cent of Turkey's investment fund sector and was not a systemic threat. Crucially, there had been no rush into dollars by worried investors, he said. The exchange rate was stable.


But as the affair has unfolded, two central questions remain so far unanswered. Why did the authorities, who knew about the apparent share price manipulation, allow the bubble to inflate for so long? And if there was collusion, how high up the system did it go?
As consumer confidence collapsed, dropping 8 per cent in October alone, a private poll reportedly delivered to Erdoğan suggested that the AKP's popularity had dropped by 6 per cent in just one month, according to former AKP lawmaker Şamil Tayyar.
The next presidential election must take place by 2028. It is widely assumed that Erdoğan, 72, will find a way to run again. But a constitutional bar on a third presidential term has led to speculation about who might eventually govern Turkey instead. Aydın Ünal, an Erdoğan loyalist and former presidential speechwriter, has warned darkly that the scandal may be a “trap” against Erdoğan, set by rival factions “from within”.
Independent journalists have meanwhile faced growing pressure. On October 14, police raided Halk TV, one of Turkey's most-watched news channels, citing a separate corruption investigation. A state-appointed trustee was subsequently installed to run the channel, which had reported extensively on the Fonzi scandal. "Only dictators raid television stations at dawn and appoint trustees," opposition leader Özgür Özel, who has called the Fonzi scandal the "theft of the century", said after the Halk TV intervention. "While the public demands accountability for the fund scandal . . . they do this."
欺诈和投机泡沫与金融业一样古老。1720年的南海泡沫——历史上最臭名昭著的庞氏骗局之一——仅在英国议会通过所谓的《泡沫法案》(意图遏制投机过度)数月后就破裂了。爱德华·钱德勒尔(Edward Chancellor)是《魔鬼抢走最后一分钱》(Devil Take the Hindmost)一书作者,该书是一部金融投机史,他表示:“‘泡沫’一词最初的含义就是欺诈。”此外,“‘伟大泡沫的一个共同模式是它们在统治阶级的支持下发生。当它们破裂时,总会有政治反弹和报复。’”**
这似乎也适用于土耳其。埃尔多安(Erdoğan)发誓要问责。“一位常见的伟大泡沫模式是它们在统治阶级的支持下发生。”他表示。在10月21日举行的AK党会议上,埃尔多安咆哮道,“那些获得非法且过度利益的人”将被交付法庭审判。“我们不会保护那些伤害我们人民的人。”他信守诺言,已有超过400人面临司法程序,并已进行了超过100次逮捕。一份关于此事的国家审计报告将于年终前交付给埃尔多安。
政府已安排对每个受影响的基金投资者支付高达1,000%回报的1,000万里拉(TL1mn)的赔偿,并设立了一个“悔过账户”,让那些获得超额利润的人自愿返还利润。批评者称,该系统不透明,可能让罪犯和政府一起将问题掩盖起来。“这是AKP过去一直使用的政治手册。行动迅速,推出一些人,设立调查,然后宣称司法制度有效。”皮科利(Piccoli)表示。
这场丑闻的经济后果可能更难掩盖。土耳其经济正在应对约30%的通胀压力,急需资本——而全球利率上升正在加剧资本稀缺的风险。但在过去两个月里,股市已下跌约三分之一,市值蒸发了约$100亿(\1000亿美元)。
这场危机可能仍有一线希望。彻底的监管清理可能恢复信心,并重振伊斯坦布尔成为国际金融中心的计划。然而,这对近1,000,000(半数为1,000,000的近似,但原文为“nearly half a million”)受影响的土耳其人及其家庭来说,是冷冰冰的安慰。“我不晓得自己是否还能相信土耳其股市。”莫尔达尔加(Mordalga)表示,他的失望体现了这场危机最大的受害者:信任。
10个月前,反对党议员在议会提出了这一问题,“如果当局掌握这些信息,为什么不及时采取行动?”艾尤切·图尔克斯·塔什(Ayyüce Türkeş Taş)询问道:“这不是共谋——掩盖犯罪吗?”
补充报道:塞拉·耶迪卡德斯(Serra Yedikardes)
每股里拉('000)
(图表数据来源:LSEG)
---
金融时报
《无畏无私》
Fraud and speculative bubbles are as old as finance itself. The South Sea Bub-
Nearly half a million retail investors who were drawn to funds with visions of 1,000 per cent returns risk losing their savings. President Erdoğan, above, says the crisis is being handled 'with a surgeon's precision' Adem Altan/AFP/Getty Images/Moe Zoyari/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect
'One of the common patterns of great bubbles is that they take place with . . . support from the ruling class'
ble of 1720, among the most notorious Ponzi schemes in history, burst only months after Britain's parliament passed the so-called Bubble Act, supposedly an initiative to rein in speculative excess. "The original meaning of the word bubble is fraud," says Edward Chancellor, author of Devil Take the Hindmost, a history of financial speculation. "Furthermore, one of the common patterns of great bubbles is that they take place with a degree of support from the governing class. When they pop, there is always political blowback and retribution."
That appears to be true of Turkey too. Erdoğan has sworn that heads will roll. "Those who obtained illicit and exorbitant gains" will be made to answer before the courts, he glowered at an AKP meeting on October 21. "We do not protect those who wrong our people." True to his word, more than 400 people face judicial proceedings, and there have been over 100 arrests so far. A state audit of what happened is due to be delivered to Erdoğan around year-end.
The government has arranged payments of up to TL1mn to each aggrieved investor per fund and established a “repentance account” into which those who made extraordinary gains can voluntarily return their profits. Critics say that system is untransparent and could allow both culprits and the government to sweep the issue under the carpet. “It is the political playbook that the AKP has always used in the past. Move fast, throw some people under the bus, set up an investigation, and then proclaim that the rule of law works,” says Piccoli.
The economic fallout of the scandal may be harder to brush aside. Turkey's economy, struggling with inflation around 30 per cent, needs capital – just when higher global interest rates risk making capital scarcer. But over the past two months the stock market has fallen by around a third, shedding some \$100bn of value.
The crisis may yet have a silver lining. A thorough regulatory clean-up could restore confidence and revive oft-touted plans to make Istanbul an international financial centre. Still, that is cold comfort for the almost half a million Turks and their families directly affected by the Fonzi scandal. “I don’t know if I can ever believe in the Turkish stock market again,” says Mordalga, whose disenchantment speaks to the crisis’s biggest casualty: trust.
That very issue was raised 10 months ago in parliament by the opposition lawmaker, who had asked a second pointed question. "If the authorities had this information, why did they not act in time?" Ayyüce Türkeş Taş inquired. "Isn't that complicity – covering up a crime?"
Additional reporting by Serra Yedikardes
Özata shares soared as Tera funds amassed almost all its tradable stock
Lira per share ('000)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2026 Source: LSEG

FINANCIAL TIMES
'Without fear and without favour'
ft.com/opinion
信贷冬天尚未完全到来,但随着秋叶飘落,AI投资热潮的环境确实变得越来越寒冷。谷歌母公司阿尔法贝特(Alphabet)、Meta和甲骨文(Oracle)本周回到债券市场,发行数十亿加元的额外债券以获取芯片和数据中心的资金,加剧了今年已估计高达约5000亿加元的此类借贷热潮。然而,超大型云服务商(hyperscalers)现在支付的成本明显高于数月前,当时似乎AI支出增长以满足计算需求仍有很长的路要走。
周一,甲骨文发行了10亿加元债券,票息率为7%至超过8.5%,较2月份的5%至7%有所上升——尽管股东也遭受了打击,因为同时进行了10亿加元的股票出售。阿尔法贝特(Google母公司)本周发行了6亿欧元的欧元债券,期限为19年,票息率超过5.2%,作为本周6亿欧元债券发行的一部分,较5月份同等期限和货币的债券发行时的4.5%有所上升,且利差也更高。
政府和企业借款人今年一直担心被“挤出”,因为超大型AI债券提供更高的收益率,而利率上升。但即使投资者将关注美国中期选举结果,以寻找民主党可能减缓数据中心建设的迹象,信贷市场吸收AI风险的能力也正在发生变化。虽然这些借贷成本的变化可能看起来不大,但在考虑到支持投资计划的巨额发行规模时,这些变化在加元规模上累积起来。它们对AI支出所需回报率施加了压力,并且对那些仍然拥有顶级信用评级和核心业务产生现金流的公司来说,这些变化尤为显著。这也反映在投资者支付更高成本以对冲债务风险。
阿尔法贝特加元债券在未来五年内违约保险成本上升至接近1%的本金水平,与墨西哥政府(评级为最低投资级别)相当。马克·扎克伯格对Meta的新个人AI代理Muse寄予厚望。万一他错了,投资者现在将Meta的创始人(这个可爱但计算密集型代理)的信用违约互换定价为1.2%,与评级为垃圾级的南非相当。
如果市场对AI借款人的冷淡可以忽略不计,那么他们引发的资本竞争以及今年利率和能源价格持续上升,正在暴露其他信用领域的裂痕。特别是在欧洲高风险层面的公司债券上,曾经飞涨的基金现在遭遇了重大打击。这些债券的收益率飙升至双位数,远高于更高评级的垃圾债。许多借款人位于如宽带等困境行业中。
这里有一个教训给债券持有人,即使这些债券有远高的信用评级,它们最终仍是对谁将承担复杂数据中心建设成本的赌注。该市场的某些部分仍在快速增长,例如提供抵押于资产(如芯片)的贷款的另类资产管理机构,但其他债权人将寻求保护以避免失控的支出。
甲骨文,作为首家开始支出超过现金流的超大型云服务商,表示将在2030年前从资本市场筹集的新资金上限为20亿加元。即使这可能是一个难以坚持的承诺,但这种承诺开始流行也是一个显著的信号。投资者已经做好准备,以防AI交易在股市轰然崩盘。相反,它可能从信贷市场的低声呻吟开始。
Credit winter has not come quite yet for the AI investment boom – but it is certainly getting colder out there as the leaves fall. Alphabet, Meta and Oracle returned to debt markets this week to sell tens of billions of dollars of additional bonds for access to chips and data centres, adding to a surge in such borrowing this year already estimated at about half a trillion dollars. The hyperscalers are, though, paying notably more than just a few months ago, when it seemed that growth in AI spending to fill the need for compute still had far to go.
On Monday, Oracle sold \$10bn in bonds with coupons of 7 to more than 8.5 per cent, up from 5 to 7 per cent in an issue in February – though shareholders also took a hit, with a concurrent \$10bn share sale. Alphabet, Google's parent, issued 19-year euro-denominated bonds with a coupon of over 5.2 per cent as part of a €6bn sale this week, up from 4.5 per cent for selling debt of the same maturity and currency in May – and at a higher spread over core rates.
Government and corporate borrowers have fretted this year about being “crowded out” by supersized AI bonds offering juicier yields while interest rates have risen. But even as investors will watch the US midterm results for signs that Democratic gains might slow down data centre construction, something is changing in credit markets’ capacity to keep absorbing AI risk.
While these may not sound like large moves in borrowing costs, they add up in dollar terms given the sheer size of issuance that is undergirding investment plans. They raise pressure on the rates of return that will be required from AI spending and are striking for companies that mostly still have top credit ratings and core businesses throwing off cash. This is also reflected in investors paying up to hedge their debt exposure.
The cost to insure Alphabet's dollar debt against a default in the next five years has risen to just under 1 per cent of principal, about the same as for Mexico, a government rated at the lowest levels of investment grade. Mark Zuckerberg has great hopes for Muse, Meta's new personal AI agent. In case he is wrong, investors are now pricing credit default swaps on the creator of the cutesy but compute-hogging agent at 1.2 per cent, in line with junk-rated South Africa.
It would be easier to brush off the market's cooling on AI borrowers if the competition for capital they have unleashed, and the prolongation of higher interest rates and energy prices this year, were not exposing credit cracks elsewhere. Funds that flew high betting on the riskiest layers of European corporate debt in particular have come down with a bump. Yields on these bonds have blown out to double
The higher yields on hyperscaler bonds raise pressure on the rates of return that will be required from tech spending
digits, more than higher-rated junk. Many of the borrowers are in struggling industries such as broadband.
There is a lesson here for bondholders sizing up AI debts that, even if they have far higher credit ratings, they are ultimately bets on who will be on the hook for the complex construction costs of data centres. Some parts of this market are still growing quickly, for example alternative asset managers extending loans secured against assets such as chips, but other creditors will be looking for protection from runaway spending.
Oracle, which was the first of the hyperscalers to start spending more than it generated in cash flow, signalled that \$20bn will be the limit for new money it will raise from capital markets until 2030. Even if that may be a hard resolution to keep, it is significant that this kind of promise is coming into fashion. Investors have braced in case the AI trade implodes with a stock market bang. Instead it might start with a credit market whimper.
Opinion Environment
安迪·卡特
皮利塔·克拉克
当今年年度联合国气候大会(COP31)下周在土耳其城市安塔利亚开幕时,请做好准备,将会有大量关于一个看似并不枯燥的主题的讨论:电力。
大会主办方希望各国政府支持一个新目标:将电力在最终能源需求中的占比从目前的约20%提升至2035.的35%。换句话说,他们希望更多汽车使用电池而非汽油,更多家庭使用电热泵而非天然气锅炉。
这个目标是自愿性的,但对于气候和我们的钱包来说都是个好主意。全球约80%的人口生活在净进口化石燃料的国家中。这些燃料的价格可能会变得昂贵。
Andy Carter

Pilita Clark

W hen this year's annual UN climate conference, COP31, kicks off next week in the Turkish city of
Antalya, brace yourself for a lot of talk about a topic that is not nearly as dull as it sounds: electricity.
The summit's hosts want governments to back a new goal to raise electricity's share of final energy demand from just over 20 per cent today to 35 per cent by 2035. In other words, they want more cars to run on batteries instead of petrol, and more homes to be heated with electric heat pumps, not gas boilers.
The target is only voluntary but it's a good idea, for the climate and for our wallets. About 80 per cent of the global population lives in countries that are net importers of fossil fuels. Those fuels can get expensive
在危机中,比如今年伊朗的战争所展示的那样。
但即使没有这样的动荡,国际能源署估计,如果这些国家提高电气化水平,到2035年,进口账单可能会减少超过$400亿加元每年。虽然需要大量前期投资,但电力技术的运营成本更低,这意味着到2035年全球电费可能会降低。
电力还能减少排放,尤其是如果电力来自可再生能源。实际上,风能和太阳能正在迅速增长,以至于去年可再生能源首次在全球发电份额中(根据 Ember 智库的说法)超过了煤炭的33%——这是一个世纪以来的首次。
因此,COP31 的电气化目标应该是绿色转型的好消息。
但等等,你可能会想,这不是一个空想吗?全球一次能源结构中化石燃料的份额几乎没有变化,从1990年的85%降至今天的约80%。这意味着所有新的绿色电力只是增加,而不是转型,而转型比预想的更加困难?
这正是去年丹尼尔·耶金(Daniel Yergin)在《外交事务》上撰文,以及其他知名专家多年来一直争论的观点,油气行业高管也持相同看法。
他们并非完全错误。化石燃料仍然主导全球能源系统,但并非你想象的那样。替代它们可能并不像那持续的80%一次能源份额所暗示的那样艰巨。
关键在于“一次能源”这一术语。一次能源指的是煤炭、石油或其他资源在转化为我们购买的“最终能源”(如电力或汽油)之前的总含量。最终能源与我们实际使用的“有效能源”(如开灯或驾车)又不同。
因为燃烧燃料发电、驱动车辆和供暖建筑会浪费大量能源,大约有三分之二的一次能源在做任何有用功之前就被浪费掉了(主要以热能形式损失)。
越来越多的分析师指出,转型并不需要将所有这些浪费能源一比一用可再生能源替代。加拿大化学工程师保罗·马丁(Paul Martin)称之为“一次能源谬误”。
Jan Rosenow 表示:“我们不需要替代浪费。” Rosenow 是一项即将出版的研究的主要作者,该研究尝试通过建模一个高度电气化、运行在可再生能源上的全球经济,来量化一次能源谬误的规模。研究表明,我们可以用约一半的一次能源获得今天相同数量的有效能源。
这是因为风能和太阳能发电避免了化石燃料发电厂中产生的热量损失,而电力技术的效率也远高于传统方式。
例如,大多数传统汽车燃料最终都以废热形式消散,而不是推动汽车前进,因此内燃机车辆的效率低于电动车。
清洁能源专家迈克尔·利布里奇(Michael Liebreich),现任布隆伯格新金融研究组(Bloomberg New Finance)负责人,表示用一次能源单位衡量经济能源使用“就如同用农业耕地面积衡量营养一样”。这也夸大了化石燃料的重要性。
这些燃料在上世纪之所以占主导地位,是因为它们比木材或马力等能源来源更高效。现在是时候让位于一代更节能、更低成本的替代品了。
pilita.clark@ft.com
信件
in a crisis, as this year's war in Iran has shown.
But even without such turmoil, the International Energy Agency reckons import bills could fall by more than \$400bn a year by 2035 if those countries boosted their electrification rates. Much upfront investment would be needed but electric tech's lower operating costs mean the pay-off should be lower energy bills across the world by 2035.
Electricity can also cut emissions, especially if it comes from renewables. As it happens, wind and solar are surging so much that renewables last year narrowly overtook coal's 33 per cent share of global power generation for what the Ember energy think-tank says is the first time in a century.
So the COP31 electrification goal should be good news for the green energy transition.
But hang on, you may be thinking. Isn't that transition a pipe dream? Hasn't the share of fossil fuels in the global primary energy mix barely budged, from 85 per cent in 1990 to about 80 per cent today? And doesn't that mean that all that new green power is more of an addition than a transition, which is proving harder than thought?
This is pretty much what the energy analyst Daniel Yergin wrote in Foreign
Affairs last year, and what other prominent experts have argued for years, along with oil executives.
They are not entirely wrong. Fossil fuels do still dominate the global energy system, but not in the way you might think. And replacing them may not be nearly as daunting a challenge for governments as that persistent 80 per cent-plus share of primary energy suggests.
The clue is in the word “primary”. Primary energy refers to the total energy content of coal, oil or other resources before it gets converted into the so-called “final energy” we get when we buy electricity or fill up at a petrol station. Final energy is different again from the “useful energy” we actually use when we turn on a light or drive a car.
Because burning fuels to generate power, drive vehicles and heat buildings wastes much of those fuels' energy as heat, about two-thirds of the primary energy that goes into the global system is lost before it does anything useful.
A growing number of energy analysts point out that the energy transition does not require all that waste energy to be replaced, joule for joule, with renewable energy. Believing otherwise is what Canadian chemical engineer Paul Martin has called the “primary energy fallacy”.
Or as the Oxford professor Jan Rosenow told me, “we don’t need to replace waste”. Rosenow is the lead author of a forthcoming study that attempts to quantify the scale of the primary energy fallacy by modelling a highly electrified global economy running on renewable power. It suggests we could get exactly the same amount of useful energy we have today with about half as much primary energy.
This is mainly because generating electricity from the wind and sun avoids the heat lost in fossil fuel power stations, and electric technologies are far more efficient.
Most of the fuel put into a conventional car, for example, ends up as waste heat instead of moving the car, making internal combustion engine vehicles less efficient than electric ones.
Clean energy expert Michael Liebreich, founder of what is now the Bloomberg New Energy Finance research group, says measuring our economy's energy use in primary energy units "is like measuring nutrition by how many acres are used in agriculture". It also inflates the importance of fossil fuels.
Those fuels grew to dominance last century because they were more efficient than energy sources like wood or horse muscles. It's time they made way for a new generation of less wasteful, and less costly, replacements.
pilita.clark@ft.com
Letters
我们还需要再次听到爱尔兰所谓脆弱的经济奇迹的故事吗?朱德·韦伯(Jude Webber)的《大阅读》文章《为什么富裕的爱尔兰仍然感觉贫穷》(11月2日)重复了熟悉的套路:房价高昂、基础设施不足、对跨国公司的依赖、波动的企业所得税,以及爱尔兰非凡繁荣可能突然消失的前景。这些都是熟悉的问题。但缺少的是背景。
房价和基础设施建设是发达世界普遍存在的问题。这些都是严重的挑战,但它们的存在
Must we endure yet another account of Ireland's supposedly precarious economic miracle? Jude Webber's Big Read article "Why rich Ireland still feels poor" (November 2) rehearses the familiar litany: unaffordable housing, inadequate infrastructure, multinational dependence, volatile corporation tax and the ever-present prospect that Ireland's extraordinary prosperity might suddenly evaporate. All familiar problems. But where is the context?
Housing affordability and infrastructure delivery are problems across the developed world. These are serious challenges, but their existence
您的社论《AI热潮的对冲局限》(10月28日,《金融时报观点》)讨论了投资者如何保护其投资组合免受AI衰退的影响。推动这一热潮的大部分资金流向了芯片、数据中心和电力,因此这些基础设施的回报不仅对其所有者,还对供应商、贷方以及其所有者至关重要。但即使AI需求持续增长,这些回报也可能面临压力:新技术可能在设备尚未偿还成本前就使现有设备失去竞争力。
新一代设备可以使计算成本降低。这对客户来说是好消息。对于一家借款购买设备的公司来说,这可能会对回报产生压力。竞争可能迫使其降低价格,而债务偿还、租赁付款和其他合同义务仍然存在。更高的使用率和更大的效率可能会抵消这种压力,但这两者都不能被视为理所当然。
公司已经开始调整对设备有效使用寿命的估计。亚马逊在2025年1月宣布,将其账目中某些服务器和网络设备的有效使用寿命从6年缩短至5年。它明确将这一变化与AI和机器学习领域更快的技术发展联系在一起。
现金储备为公司提供了适应的时间,但并不能保证早期投资会带来回报。一个行业可以增长,但其中一些公司可能变得不那么有利可图。
因此,股东应该问:设备需要多长时间才能收回成本?如果计算成本下降,它是否仍能赚取足够的利润?公司在条件变化时能否改变哪些财务承诺?一个投资者可能对技术的未来做出正确判断,但仍可能高估当前购买的设备的回报。泽扎格·凯莫娃(Zezag Kaimova),阿布扎比,阿联酋
Your editorial “The limits of hedging the AI boom” (The FT View, October 28) considers how investors can protect their portfolios from an AI downturn. Much of the money driving the boom is going into chips, data centres and power, so the returns on this infrastructure matter to its suppliers and lenders as well as its owners. But those returns can come under pressure even if demand for AI keeps growing: new technology can make existing equipment less competitive before it has paid for itself.
New generations of equipment can make computing cheaper. That is good news for customers. For a company that borrowed to buy its equipment, it can put returns under pressure. Competition may force it to cut prices, while debt repayments, lease payments and other contractual commitments remain. Higher usage and greater efficiency may offset this pressure, but neither can be taken for granted.
Companies are already revising their estimates of how long equipment will remain useful. Amazon announced in January 2025 it would shorten the useful life assumed in its accounts for some servers and networking equipment from six years to five. It explicitly linked this change to faster technological development, particularly in AI and machine learning.
Cash reserves give a company time to adapt, but do not by themselves ensure that earlier investments will pay off. A sector can grow while some of its companies become less profitable.
Shareholders should therefore ask how long the equipment will take to pay for itself, whether it can still earn enough if computing prices fall, and which financial commitments the company can change as conditions evolve. An investor can be right about the future of a technology and still overestimate the returns on the equipment bought today. Zezag Kaimova Abu Dhabi, UAE
西蒙·曼迪(Simon Mundy)在《道德金融》(Moral Money,10月23日)中警告铜供应短缺是正确的。然而,可信的解决方案确实存在,如果正确利用,可以加速朝循环经济的进程。
铜非常适合循环利用,其重点在于减少生产需求和最小化浪费,而非增加产量。这种金属可以无限次循环利用,而不会失去其核心性能。行业估计显示,铜的生产中两-thirds仍在过去一个世纪处于有效使用状态。
在美国,从工业废料中回收的铜占2025年表观消费量约40%(约920,000吨,来自总计2.2百万吨)。这一贡献可以进一步提升,并在其他地区复制。随着欧洲电话网络转向光纤,过时的铜缆成为战略性资源。
英国电信(BT)预计在2030年代通过其遗留网络回收200,000吨铜。计划中的网络退役提供了组织回收的机会,避免宝贵基础设施被埋在地下。
然而,回收铜单靠自身无法弥补预计的供应缺口。我们还需要审视默认使用铜的规格。减少不必要的管道长度、审查过大的排水系统以及优化电气布局,可以在不影响性能和安全的情况下降低材料需求。
爱尔兰在2025年单独吸引了78家首次投资者。然而,这并未揭示爱尔兰经济模式的可持续性。
英国的《2035年关键矿物战略》(Vision 2035: Critical Minerals Strategy)报告认可了铜的战略重要性,但政府的《循环经济增长计划》仍未公布。部长们应紧急将两者联系起来,与苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的地方政府合作,建立一致的方法。
不采取行动将不廉价,并可能支持犯罪回收网络。盗贼已经针对电力电缆、电信和可再生能源设施,每年给英国经济造成约£500百万的损失。通过迅速果断的行动,政府可以加速朝新型循环资源安全的进程,不仅适用于铜,还包括其他关键原材料。
帕特里克·施罗德(Patrick Schroeder)
伦敦(SW1)查塔姆房(Chatham House)高级研究员
---
*原文在此自然截断,以下内容缺失,严禁推测或续写*
如果对《金融时报》对您投诉的回应不满意,您可以向《金融时报》编辑投诉委员会申诉:[complaints.commissioner@ft.com](mailto:complaints.commissioner@ft.com)
Simon Mundy is right to warn about looming copper shortages (Moral Money, October 23). However, not only do credible solutions exist, if harnessed correctly they can fast-track progress towards a circular economy.
Copper is well suited to circularity, which focuses less on increasing production and more on reducing demand and minimising waste. The metal can be recycled repeatedly without losing its essential properties. Industry estimates suggest that two-thirds of the copper produced over the
For more than two generations, Ireland has attracted, retained, lost and replaced successive waves of international investment. Clothing, electronics, computers, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and digital technologies have come, changed and sometimes gone. Yet the economy has continued to attract new industries, technologies and enterprises. Ireland attracted 78 first-time investors in 2025 alone.
tells us remarkably little about the sustainability of Ireland's economic model.
The familiar warnings about what would happen if today's major
If you are not satisfied with the FT's response to your complaint, you can appeal to the FT Editorial Complaints Commissioner: complaints.commissioner@ft.com
BANX

"I PRETENDED TRUMP WAS ON THE BALLOT"
past century remains in productive use. In the US, copper recycled from post-industrial scrap accounted for roughly 40 per cent of apparent consumption (around 920,000 tonnes out of the 2.2mn tonnes) in 2025.
This contribution can be increased and replicated elsewhere. As European telephone networks switch to fibre, redundant copper cables become a strategic resource.
BT alone expects to recover up to 200,000 tonnes from its legacy network through the 2030s. Planned network retirements offer an opportunity to organise recovery before valuable infrastructure is abandoned underground.
Yet recycling cannot close the projected supply gap alone. We must also review specifications that use copper by default. Reducing unnecessary pipe lengths, reviewing oversized plumbing systems and improving electrical layouts can cut material requirements without compromising performance and safety.
The UK's “Vision 2035: Critical Minerals Strategy” report recognises copper's strategic importance, yet the government's “circular economy growth plan” remains unpublished. Ministers should urgently connect the two, working with the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to establish a coherent approach.
Failure to do so will not be cheap and risks supporting criminal recycling networks. Thieves are already targeting power cables, telecommunications and renewable energy installations, costing the UK economy an estimated £500mn annually. By moving quickly and decisively governments can accelerate progress towards a new kind of circular resource security, not only for copper but also for other critical raw materials.
Patrick Schroeder
Senior Research Fellow, Chatham House, London SW1, UK
investors disappeared generally neglect to ask what might replace them. They highlight the possible disappearance of particular companies and ignore Ireland's repeatedly demonstrated capacity to attract their successors. Renewal is as important as attraction and retention.
Of course corporation tax concentration presents risks. Subtracting potentially volatile revenues from future budgets is a useful stress test, but not a complete account of a dynamic economy.
Ireland's genuine difficulty may be that its ability to attract productive investment and people has outstripped
阿里亚·希布利(Aliya Shibli)的报告显示,选择出售而非扩张的创业者人数已连续八年达到高位(金融时报《金融时报财经》,10月24日),这不会让支持中小企业的人感到意外。
英国私营部门中约60%的员工,即约1100万人,在小型和中型企业(SMEs)中工作,这些企业定义为雇员不超过250人的企业。然而,不到五分之一的企业位于伦敦。
在默西亚资产管理(Mercia Asset Management)公司,我们每年通过风险投资、发展资本和不动产融资,在英国全国11个办公室向SMEs投资约£250万(误:应为£250mn)。我们每年投资约£250mn。
我们与英国首相安德鲁·伯恩汉姆(Andy Burnham)对英国企业的乐观态度一致,最近我与他见面时,他积极与创业者和投资者交流,我感谢他对态度的积极面,并建议达成一个轻松的协议:让我们在地区内创造更少的SMEs,而不是更多。
这个观点是故意挑衅性的。太多有前途的英国企业在伦敦之外仍然规模较小,因为它们难以获得扩张至250名员工以上所需的资金。当它们最终实现扩张时,往往会被海外收购者收购。
首相支持通过赋能让这些企业成长为更大规模的目标。
“扩张资本”在观察者眼中有不同的标准。在英国的地区,这通常意味着投资£5mn到£40mn,而不是£100mn到£500mn。伦敦的几个成功案例不应分散我们对其他地区机遇的注意力。
一些相对较小的干预措施可以迅速改变局面,并支持“每个邮政编码的良性增长”。这可能包括由政府和机构资本支持的、针对地区的扩张基金;后续的跨界融资,为公司准备上市(Aim);以及一个有效的Aim市场,帮助保留下一代有价值的英国企业。
政府可以通过以下方式加强Aim市场:
这样做,更多地区企业应该能够扩张并留在英国。如此一来,我们或许能真正开始减少SMEs的数量,因为更多企业已经成长为更大的英国企业。 —— 马克·佩顿(Mark Payton),默西亚资产管理(Mercia Asset Management)首席执行官,英国伯明翰
邮箱:letters.editor@ft.com
包含白天电话号码和完整地址
更正:corrections@ft.com
其能力来适应它们。这对我们的规划、基础设施交付和公共行政体系提出了挑战,但并非证明经济模式失败的证据。
也许是时候退休那个神话般的“爱尔兰偶然经济”的概念了。另一个神话生物能提供更好的解释:凤凰。
爱尔兰的经济实力从未依赖于维持每个产业的生存。它在于其不断更新和替换产业的能力。 —— 科诺·斯基汉(Conor Skehan),前爱尔兰住房署主席,马拉希德,都柏林郡,爱尔兰
Aliya Shibli's report that the number of founders choosing to sell, not scale, is at an eight-year high (FT Money, October 24) will not surprise those of us who back smaller companies.
Sixty per cent of private sector employees, around 17mn people, work in small and medium-sized enterprises in the UK, defined as businesses with fewer than 250 employees. Yet less than one in five is based in London.
At Mercia Asset Management, we invest around £250mn a year into SMEs across the UK through venture capital, development capital and property finance, from our 11 offices nationwide.
We share Prime Minister Andy Burnham's optimism about UK businesses, and it was pleasing to see him engaging so openly with entrepreneurs and investors when I met him recently. I thanked him for his positive attitude and suggested a light-hearted pact: let's create fewer SMEs in the regions, not more.
The point was deliberately provocative. Too many promising British businesses outside London remain small because they struggle to access the capital needed to scale beyond 250 employees. And when they do achieve scale, they are too often bought by overseas acquirers.
The prime minister supported the aim of creating fewer SMEs by empowering them to grow larger.
Scale-up capital is in the eye of the beholder. In the UK's regions, it often means investments of £5mn to £40mn, not £100mn to £500mn. A handful of London success stories should not distract us from the scale of the opportunity elsewhere.
Some relatively modest interventions could rapidly change the landscape and support “good growth in every postcode”. This might comprise regionally targeted scale-up funds backed by government and institutional capital; subsequent crossover funding to prepare companies for an Aim listing; and a functioning Aim market that helps retain the next generation of valuable British businesses.
The government could strengthen Aim by removing restrictions that limit the participation of Venture Capital Trusts in the open market and by encouraging greater institutional investment in Aim small caps.
Do those things, and more regional businesses should be able to scale and remain in the UK. And, by definition, we might finally start creating fewer SMEs, because more of them have grown into larger British businesses. Mark Payton CEO, Mercia Asset Management, Birmingham, UK
Email: letters.editor@ft.com
Include daytime telephone number and full address Corrections: corrections@ft.com
its ability to accommodate them. That is a challenge to our systems of planning, infrastructure delivery and public administration, not proof that the economic model has failed.
Perhaps it is time to retire the mythical creature of Ireland's fluke economy. There is another mythical creature that offers a much better explanation: the Phoenix.
Ireland's economic strength has never depended on keeping every industry alive. It lies in its repeated ability to renew and replace them.
Conor Skehan
Former Chair of the Housing Agency, Malahide, County Dublin, Ireland
杰米娅·凯利(Jemima Kelly)在轻率地否定记者和广播人蒂姆·斯坦利(Tim Stanley)的警告时,认为英国即将爆发内战(题为《英国右翼对“内战”的迷恋》,评论,10月26日),是有些不公平的。
斯坦利以及其他一些在报刊和互联网上发表类似观点的人,正像克雷恩·布里顿(Crane Brinton)在其1938年经典著作《革命的解剖》中所描述的那样,“职业先知和胆小的保守派”,执行着西方社会知识分子的“伟大功能”,即“[namely] 将普通人从无思考的乐观主义中唤醒”,“卡桑德拉或许与柏拉图一样,有资格被视为一门伟大学术传统的创始人。”
在凯利(和我们)过于自信地引用布里顿的后续警告(“卡桑德拉的继承者并未完全达到她不幸的无误性”)之前,布里顿在其开创性研究中提及的革命先兆包括:
这些都应让我们至少有些警醒。
查尔斯·梅西(Charles Mercey)
特尔利斯福德(Tellisford),索默塞特(Somerset),英国
---
Jemima Kelly is a little unfair in airily dismissing the journalist and broadcaster Tim Stanley's warning that the UK is on the brink of civil war (“The right’s obsession with ‘civil war’ in Britain”, Opinion, October 26).
Stanley, and some of the others who take to print and the internet with similar views, are what Crane Brinton, in his 1938 classic The Anatomy of Revolution, describes as “professional seers and timid conservatives” performing “one of the great functions of the intellectuals in Western society”, [namely] “to shake ordinary mortals out of their unthinking optimism, and Cassandra has perhaps as much claim as Plato to be founder of a great academic tradition.”
Before Kelly (and we) take too much comfort from Brinton's ensuing caveat ("Cassandra's successors have not quite achieved her unhappy infallibility"), a glance at the harbingers of revolution that Brinton induces from his groundbreaking study – which include government deficits, more than the usual number of complaints over taxation, governmental favouring of one set of economic interests over another, the intensification of social antagonisms, the closing of career opportunities to the talented, and the separation of economic power from political power and social distinction – ought to give us at least some pause for thought.
Charles Mercey
Tellisford, Somerset, UK
给摄影编辑的一个词。报道《丰田准备释放其人型机器人》(报道,11月2日)中包含了一张照片,根据《金融时报》印刷版的图片说明,“一台丰田机器人在打篮球”。这纯属人格投射,并且是对将人类品质归因于机器的一种令人不安的趋势的证明。
我们是否需要被提醒,机器人不会“玩”?“玩”不仅仅是某物所做的性质(在这个例子中,机器人将球投入篮筐)。如精神分析学家D.W.温尼科特(DW Winnicott)在其1971年出版的《游戏与现实》一书中所指出的那样,“玩”是主观现实与客观现实之间的关系。机器人或许可以被认为模拟游戏,但仅此而已。
让我们将主观经验的语言(包括智能,但可能已经为时已晚)从我们对机器人——以及人工智能的一般讨论——的描述和讨论中排除出去。
保罗·阿克塞尔罗德(Paul Axelrod)
旧金山(San Francisco),加利福尼亚州(CA),美国
A word for your photo editors. The report “Toyota poised to unleash its humanoid robots” (Report, November 2), includes a picture in which, according to the caption in the print version of the FT, “a Toyota robot plays basketball”. This is pure anthropomorphism, and evidence of a disturbing trend of attributing human qualities to machines.
Do we need reminding that robots cannot play? Play is not simply a property of what something does (in this case, a robot throws a ball into a basket). As the psychoanalyst DW Winnicott pointed out in his 1971 book Playing and Reality, play is a relationship between subjective and objective reality. Robots may be said to simulate play, but no more than that.
Let's keep the language of subjective experience (including intelligence, but it's probably too late for that) out of our descriptions and discussions of what robots – and AI in general – are all about.
Paul Axelrod
San Francisco, CA, US
马丁·沃尔夫经济学
投资热潮持续的时间越长,其结束时带来的负面影响可能就越大。
人工智能有许多——大多尚未完全被理解——对人类的影响。其中之一是一个具体且当下的问题:它引发了对物理资本的巨大投资热潮,以满足对大型数据中心的需求。据哥伦比亚商学院的斯蒂恩·范·纽韦布鲁赫(Stijn van Nieuwerburgh)撰写的一篇引人入胜的论文《“Financing the AI Buildout”》显示,美国的投资规模将从2025年到2032年(含)平均占GDP的3.6%。这将超过1870年至1890年间铁路投资占GDP的平均2.2%,更不用说1956年至1973年间公路投资占GDP的1.1%了。实际上,这将是有史以来规模最大的行业特定投资热潮。
一些早期的转型持续了更长的时间。但这一事实使得AI建设更加集中,因此可能更加具有破坏性。此外,范·纽韦布鲁赫解释称,尽管这些巨头公司(主要是谷歌、亚马逊、Meta、微软和甲骨文)推动了巨额投资热潮,但融资这一热潮也正在产生一些经典风险。
而且,这些风险也是宏观经济性质的。繁荣可能轻易转化为衰退,股票市场估值崩盘、公司破产、贷款人亏损,并使计划中的投资消失。这次会不同吗?说到底,这取决于新兴企业的盈利能力,而在这个案例中,人们的期望非常高。
论文指出,上述公司的集体资本支出从2020年的97亿加元增长到2025年的416亿加元,并预计2026年将达到801亿加元。2020年,这些公司的运营现金流盈余超过资本支出的155亿加元。2025年,它们仍然拥有超过187亿加元的现金流盈余。但在这些年内,资本支出与运营现金流的比例从2020年的38%上升至2025年的近69%。然后,根据公司的预测,2026年资本支出将超过现金流93亿加元,而资本支出与现金流的比例将达到113%。谷歌和微软的支出仍将略低于其现金流,而甲骨文的支出将超过现金流的138%,亚马逊的支出将超过36%,Meta的支出最接近现金流。
因此,越来越复杂的金融安排正在被采用。因此,这并非第一次,投资热潮正在引发杠杆率的爆炸性增长。虽然超规模数据中心的直接投资仍然重要,但“边际融资模式正在发生变化。专业数据中心开发商、REITs、基础设施基金和私募股权投资者越来越多地建设或收购设施,并将容量出租给超规模数据中心和其他大型用户。”
根据论文,结果是一个日益复杂且不透明的金融结构。特别是,它指出,“公开评级的债务仅占数据中心融资的一小部分;更大的规模是通过综合银行贷款和私人信贷设施提供的,这些信息公开可得性较低。”
人工智能建设被预测为美国历史上最大的投资热潮
美国选定的资本支出热潮(占GDP的百分比)
总体而言,核心问题不仅在于人工智能基础设施面临技术和运营风险,而是该行业的融资结构能够传播并放大这些风险。这在历史上是一种熟悉的行为。数据中心所有者面临的风险包括:
Martin Wolf Economics
The longer the investment surge continues, the bigger the negative impact is likely to be when it ends

rtificial intelligence has many – mostly far from fully understood – implications for humanity. Among these is something concrete and current: it has launched a huge surge in spending on physical capital, to meet the demand for huge data centres. Indeed, according to a fascinating paper, “Financing the AI Buildout” by Stijn van Nieuwerburgh of the Columbia Business School, spending in the US will average 3.6 per cent of GDP from 2025 to 2032 (inclusive). This would be larger than the average of 2.2 per cent of GDP spent on railways between 1870 and 1890, let alone the 1.1 per cent spent on highways from 1956 to 1973. In fact, it would be the biggest sector-specific investment boom of all.
Some of those earlier transformations were sustained over far longer periods. But this fact makes the AI build-out even more concentrated and so, quite possibly, even more disruptive. Moreover, as van Nieuwerburgh explains, financing the boom is now creating some classic risks, despite the strength of the huge companies (mainly Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Oracle) driving the huge surge in spending.
Moreover, these risks are also macroeconomic. Booms can easily turn into busts, as stock market valuations collapse, companies go bankrupt, lenders lose money and planned investment vanishes. Will this time be different? Ultimately, that depends on the profitability of the new businesses and, in this case, hopes are very high indeed.
As the paper points out, aggregate capital expenditures by the companies listed above rose from \$97bn in 2020, to \$416bn in 2025 and a forecast of \$801bn in 2026. In 2020, the surplus of operating cash flow of these companies over capital spending was \$155bn. In 2025, they still had a cash flow surplus of more than \$187bn. But over these years, the ratio of capital spending to operating cash flows rose from 38 per cent in 2020 to nearly 69 per cent in 2025. Then, in 2026, according to the companies' forecasts, capital spending will exceed cash flow by \$93bn and the ratio of spending to cash flow will hit 113 per cent. Alphabet and Microsoft will still spend a little less than their cash flow. But Oracle's spending will be 138 per cent above it, Amazon's 36 per cent above it and Meta's closet to it.

As a result, ever more complex financial arrangements are being made. Thus, not for the first time, an investment boom is causing an explosion in leverage. While the hyperscalers' direct investment is still important, "the marginal financing model is shifting. Specialized data center developers, REITs, infrastructure funds, and private equity investors increasingly build or acquire facilities and lease capacity to hyperscalers and other large users."
The result, according to the paper, is an increasingly complex and non-transparent financial structure. In particular, it notes, “publicly rated debt represents only a relatively small share of the datacenter financing; much larger volumes are provided through syndicated bank loans and private-credit facilities, for which little information is publicly available."


The AI buildout is forecast to be the biggest in US history
Selected US capital expenditure booms (% of GDP)


Source: Van Nieuwerburgh — 'Financing the AI Buildout' (Brookings, 2026)
Martin Wolf
In sum, “the central issue is not simply that AI infrastructure is exposed to technological and operating risks, but that the sector’s financing structure can transmit and amplify those risks.” This is historically familiar behaviour. Risks for data centre owners include: concentration in the tenants and also in sources of final demand; technological obsolescence and so the need to scrap and replace relatively quickly; and political and operational difficulties involved in making the investments work. Moreover
然而,范·纽韦尔堡补充道,芯片设计商、云服务提供商、数据中心运营商以及基础设施投资者通过长期合同、战略投资和融资安排日益相互依赖,这进一步加剧了系统的脆弱性。
这些问题不仅仅是AI行业内部的问题。这轮投资热潮规模巨大,对宏观经济产生了重大影响。美国联邦储备委员会的一份报告指出,计算机硬件、软件和数据中心的支出在今年第一季度对美国季度环比GDP增长贡献超过1个百分点,但同时这些类别的净进口增加也拉低了GDP增长0.5个百分点。国际货币基金组织(IMF)的《世界经济展望报告》以及马特·克莱恩(Matt Klein)最近的Substack文章都揭示了全球AI热潮对台湾和韩国产业的国际溢出效应。
然而,一个关键问题在于:AI狂热已经在多大程度上感染了股市,尤其是美国股市。这里的一些脆弱性已经显现。首先,“七大巨头”(阿尔法贝特、亚马逊、苹果、Meta、微软、英伟达和特斯拉)在最近一段时间内确实一直将美国股市推向更高高度。其次,股市的估值罕见地达到如此高位,其调整后的实际收益率仅为2.5%,这仅比当前的实际利率略高。这意味着只有在股票收益即将比以往任何时候增长得更快的情况下,这种估值才有意义。然而,历史上,每当收益相对于股价如此低迷时,后者往往会崩盘。这场由AI驱动的繁荣,伴随着对未来盈利能力、对巨额且迅速增长的投资回报率、以及现在复杂的金融工程的不可避免的不确定性,将会有所不同吗?
投资热潮和相关的金融工程持续时间越长,其结束时带来的负面经济影响可能就越大。这并不意味着AI本身不会成为它看起来的那种具有变革性的技术,尽管只有热衷于玩俄罗斯轮盘赌的物种才会容忍一家公司(如Anthropic)的招股说明书中提到“可能对人类造成灾难性或存在性风险”。新技术往往会引发股市狂热和投资热潮,最终导致崩盘。最近的市场震荡表明,这种情况可能正在发生在AI身上。现实回归的时刻终将到来,准备好迎接它吧。
martin.wolf@ft.com
ver, van Nieuwerburgh adds, “Chip designers, cloud providers, data center operators, and infrastructure investors increasingly depend on one another through long-term contracts, strategic investments, and financing arrangements.” This creates fragility.
These are not just issues for the AI sector itself. The investment boom is big enough to have large macroeconomic implications. A paper from the Federal Reserve suggested that spending on computer hardware, software and data centres contributed more than a percentage point to annualised quarter-over-quarter US GDP growth in the first quarter of this year, partially offset by a half a percentage point of GDP increase in net imports in those categories. Both the IMF's World Economic Outlook and a recent Substack from Matt Klein shed light on the international spillovers of the global AI boom, especially on to Taiwanese and South Korean products.
A crucial question, however, is how far the AI mania has infected the stock market, above all in the US. Here some of the vulnerabilities are evident. First, the Magnificent Seven (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla) have, until recently, indeed been pulling the US stock market ever higher. Second, the market is at valuations rarely seen before, with a cyclically adjusted real earnings yield of 2.5 per cent, which is only fractionally above the current real interest rate. This only makes sense if earnings from stocks are about to grow far faster than ever before. In the past, however, whenever earnings have been this low relative to stock prices, the latter have crashed. Is this AI-driven boom, with all its unavoidable uncertainties about future profitability, returns on the huge and rapidly growing investment, and now the elaborate financial engineering, going to be any different?
The longer the investment boom and the associated financial engineering continue, the bigger the negative economic impact is likely to be when it ends. This does not mean that AI itself will fail to be the transformative technology it seems to be, though only a species that adores playing Russian roulette would tolerate a business (Anthropic) whose prospectus says it could create “catastrophic or existential risks to humanity”. New technologies have often triggered stock market manias and investment booms that end in busts. Recent market tremors suggest this could even be happening to AI now. A return to reality will come when it will come. The readiness is all.
martin.wolf@ft.com
社会
亚当·图兹
[图片占位符]
[图片占位符]
“疯狂的美国”、“速度球资本主义”——由于唐纳德·特朗普与人工智能超规模发展的恶性巧合,我们正生活在一个超越常规思维、迫使我们创造新概念的关键时刻。我们需要新的概念来把握美国政治经济的动力以及其超越性特征。
对于当前的局势,曼哈顿计划这个比喻已经过于温和,无法作为有用的参考。20世纪90年代的互联网泡沫时代则是一个截然不同的、更为明媚的时期。就纯粹的开支规模而言,即使是19世纪后期的铁路建设热潮也已被超越。随着人工智能繁荣的全貌逐渐清晰,这些熟悉的参考点都显得不足以描述当下。
如果我们转向20世纪更黑暗的历史时刻呢?20世纪最具戏剧性和暴力的现代化项目都是国家主导的——例如斯大林主义工业化。我们当下的时代是美国政府扮演支持角色的时代。
但私营企业掌控一切。因此,工业革命或许是最接近的前例。尽管这一点更接近真相,但工业革命伴随的意识形态是古典自由主义——而今已不复存在。
当你逐一检视可能的历史参考时,最终会得出一个震撼的结论:如果你寻找的是能够改变社会、威胁到阻挡者生死存亡的资本主义资源动员时刻,那么帝国主义和殖民地统治是最合适的参考。
SOCIETY
Adam Tooze


merican berserk", "speedball capitalism" – thanks to the malign coincidence of Donald Trump and AI hyperscaling we are
living through a conjuncture that defies conventional thinking and challenges us to coin new terms. We need new conceptions that allow us to grasp both the dynamism of America's political economy and its transgressive character.
For our current situation, the Manhattan Project is far too quaint to serve as a useful reference point. The dot.com bubble of the 1990s was an altogether sunnier time. In terms of sheer spending, even the epic railway booms of the late 19th century are being eclipsed. As the full scale of the AI boom becomes clear, these familiar reference points all fall short.
What if we turn to the darker moments of modern history? The most dramatic and violent programmes of modernisation in the 20th century were state-led – Stalinist industrialisation, for instance. Our moment is one in which the US government plays a supportive role.
But private business is in charge. So perhaps the Industrial Revolution is the obvious precursor. Although this is closer to the mark, the accompanying ideology of the Industrial Revolution was classical liberalism — not so today.
As you work your way down the list of possible histories to reference, before long you arrive at a jaw-dropping conclusion. If you are looking for moments of capitalist resource mobilisation that transformed societies and threatened to deliver nothing short of the end of the world for those who stood in their way, it is empire and colonialism
以及奴隶制,特别是后者。
当然,这里的目的并非是要将当今时代与大西洋奴隶贸易的恐怖相提并论。但奴隶社会和奴隶贸易的历史告诉我们,现代社会中那些被认为是约束“合理”或“可能性”的“防护栏”实际上是多么脆弱。
最近的历史研究,如《英国奴隶贸易商名录》以及同名威廉·佩蒂格鲁(William Pettigrew)的著作,展示了如何将超过1200万非洲人从家园拆散并置于奴役状态,背后涉及金融创新和新的物流体系;国家权力不仅支持奴隶贸易,还围绕其重新构建;文化生产和媒体则宣扬了一种新的国家创新与赋权神话;经济论证则被奴隶贸易中的“特许垄断”或“自由贸易”问题所驱动。
佩蒂格鲁的研究表明,大西洋奴隶制吸纳了英国精英阶层的大部分。那些自诩为自由的英国人,将国家发展建立在对他人奴役的基础上。如果英国从二流欧洲国家崛起为全球霸主,其开创的新型“英格兰-全球化”模式,那么现代化的奴隶供应链就是其首个项目之一。
“项目”这个概念作为一个全球性的“远征”,正是这一早期现代时期的产物。对未来重塑的集体企业动员的想象力,以及这种对未来的痴迷,直到21世纪的硅谷都有回声。目标是利润。但逻辑并非是谨慎的利润率最大化。与今日一样,投机是风险资本精神的核心。
当一个企业家告诉你,他们正在从事一项将改变人类未来的极其有利可图的项目,但这项事业可能毁灭我们已知的世界时,请相信他们的言辞。
1720年的南海泡沫(South Sea Bubble)通常被视为世界上第一个庞氏骗局。但如果仅关注其金融方面,我们就会忽略其真正的根基。南海公司并非经营郁金香,而是一家巨大的、获准的人贩运企业,通过与西班牙王室签订的垄断合同,向西班牙种植园供应数万名被奴役的非洲人。
如果你真想从历史中获取参考,以增强对当下的认知,请不要回避奴隶制历史所揭示的内容。在金融、企业、无限制的技术创新、对人类范畴的激进现代主义思考以及国家权力的结合体中,没有什么能让我们感到安心。
that we have to consider, and chattel slavery in particular.
The point, of course, is not to suggest any moral equivalence between our current moment and the horror of the Atlantic slave trade. But what histories of slave societies and the slave trade remind us of is how little room there is for complacency with regard to the guardrails that supposedly constrain the reasonable or the possible in modern society.
The latest histories to perform this service are the Register of British Slave Traders and William Pettigrew's book of the same name. They show us how the uprooting and enslaving of over 12mn African people involved financial innovation and new logistical systems; state power not just mobilised in support of the trade but reinvented around it; cultural production and the media touting a new national myth of innovation and empowerment; economic argument energised by the question of licensed monopoly or free trade, in enslaved people.
As Pettigrew shows us, Atlantic slavery sucked in a substantial part of the British elite. Britons who celebrated their own freedom hitched their national development to the enslaving of others. If Britain, in its rise from second-tier European player to global hegemon, pioneered a new form of Anglo-globalisation, then a modernised slave supply chain was among its first projects.
The very idea of a project as a globe-spanning “venture” was a product of this early modern period. The vision of remaking the future by collective corporate mobilisation, the obsession that echoes down to 21st-century Silicon Valley, took root in Britain in the Tudor and Stuart age. The aim was profit. But the logic was not that of careful maximisation of rate of return. As today, speculation was fundamental to the spirit of venture capital.
When a businessperson tells you they are embarked on a vastly lucrative project that will change the future of humanity, but which comes with a risk of ending the world as we know it, take them at their word.
The South Sea Bubble of 1720 is commonly remembered as the world's first Ponzi scheme. But in focusing on the financial aspects, we obscure its real underpinnings. The South Sea Company did not deal in tulips. It was a gigantic human-trafficking operation, licensed by a monopoly contract with the Spanish Crown to supply tens of thousands of enslaved Africans to Spanish plantations.
If you truly want reference points from the past to enhance your situational awareness of the present, don't flinch from what histories of slavery have to tell us. There is nothing in the combination of finance, enterprise, unfettered technological innovation, radical modernist thinking about the category of the human and state power that should reassure us.

米兰维多利亚·埃马努埃莱二世大道是奢侈品购物者的热门地点 —— 梦想时光
如果你是一位非常富有且全球流动性强的个人,正在考虑在哪里安营扎寨,你可能会密切关注两个
截然相反的财政趋势。
一方面,有加利福尼亚州及其同类,担忧社会不平等的影响,并试图征收财富税。另一方面,有像希腊这样的国家,希望吸引超级富豪 —— 包括英国基金经理克里斯·罗科斯 —— 以优惠条款,希望财富能够滴滴溢下。
而意大利则试图两者兼顾,结果可能两者都无法实现。该国成功地将自己定位为富裕个人的税收避风港,包括那些因英国放弃非居民税规则而离开伦敦的人。然而,现在意大利正在考虑对富豪征收“离境税”。
根据总理乔尔吉亚·梅洛尼(Giorgia Meloni)草拟的预算法案,当前居民如果拥有全球范围内超过 800,000 欧元 的股权或债务投资,一旦他们厌倦了 La Dolce Vita ,无论是否出售资产,都将面临 26% 的资本利得税。
这并非完全前所未有。除了美国,一些欧洲国家 —— 包括德国、法国和西班牙 —— 也对富有个人征收离境税。这也消除了仅为出售累积利润而移居低税收司法管辖区的动机,这一点是合理的。
但意大利的征税范围异常广泛。 800,000 欧元 的门槛适用于居民的总资产,而非扣除借款或抵押贷款,这意味着税收将涉及大量高级专业人士。相比之下,西班牙的版本适用于拥有超过 400万欧元 资产的人。
梅洛尼的计划还有其他不尽如人意的特点。一些纳税人可能需要出售他们可能长期持有的资产,以支付税款。而
当意大利居民移居到欧盟国家,但并未出售股票和股份时,他们将在五年后收回资金。整个流程或许可以理解为对意大利国家的强制贷款。
最大的问题在于,离境税向世界传递了混乱的信号,即意大利对财富创造的看法。这还不足十年,意大利曾通过
提供对外收入的统一税率,为世界富豪铺红毯。在这种情况下,专家认为,新措施将免除这些人的税收。但至少在哲学层面上,这让意大利看起来更像加利福尼亚,而非希腊。
梅洛尼在这一问题上有很多需要失去的。政府对新税收可能带来的潜在收益的估计非常有限,从明年不足 4 欧元 到接下来四年峰值 6.7 欧元 ,然后再次下降。实际上,在实施离境税的国家中,财政收入通常低于预期。相比之下,意大利吸引富有外国人的制度每年为国家带来数亿欧元的税收。
加利福尼亚州的选民将于昨日决定是否征收亿万富翁税。一个拥有世界上许多最大公司的州 —— 其中许多全球知名企业总部设于此 —— 可以负担得起对其富有居民采取强硬立场。意大利 —— 尽管拥有迷人的风景和精美的 aperitivi —— 需要更努力地工作。

Milan's Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II is a haunt of luxury shoppers — Dreamstime
f you are a very wealthy, globally mobile person wondering where to pitch your tent, you are probably keenly focused on two
big – and conceptually opposed – fiscal trends.
On the one hand, there's California and its ilk, concerned by the societal impacts of rising inequality and attempting to impose wealth taxes. On the other, there are the likes of Greece, keen to attract the super-rich – including UK fund manager Chris Rokos – with sweet deals, in the hope that wealth will trickle down.
And then there's Italy, which wants to do both, and thus risks achieving neither. The country has successfully marketed itself as a tax haven for wealthy individuals, including those fleeing London following the scrapping of non-dom rules. Now, however, it is mulling the imposition of an “exit tax” on rich emigrants.
Under the proposed rules sketched out in Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's draft budget law, current residents with more than €800,000 of equity or debt investments worldwide would, should they ever tire of La Dolce Vita, be slapped with a 26 per cent capital gains tax, whether they sell their assets or not.
This is not totally unprecedented. Alongside the US, a number of European countries – including Germany, France and Spain – levy exit taxes on rich individuals. And it removes the incentive to move to a lower-tax jurisdiction simply to sell amassed gains, which is sensible enough.
But Italy is casting the net unusually wide. The €800,000 threshold, which applies to a resident's gross assets rather than deducting borrowings or mortgages, means the tax would enmesh a lot of senior professionals. Spain's version, by contrast, applies to those with over €4mn in assets.
Meloni's plan has other unappealing quirks. Some taxpayers will have to sell assets they might otherwise have held longer, in order to pay their bill. And
英国最大的银行之一——国家西部银行(NatWest)发现,一些疫情期间形成的习惯难以摆脱。上个月,银行员工在被要求花费更多时间在办公室时提出了抱怨。虽然顾客可能对一些封锁时期的爱好(如腌制蔬菜或制作黑麦面包)的热情有所降温,但一些金融习惯却保留了下来。
例如,储蓄。一组上升的家庭储蓄率表明,英国消费者正在保留更多收入,并更加关注如何存放额外的现金。官方数据显示,过去三年,每季度平均储蓄额占收入的几乎9%(almost 9 per cent),而2017年至2019年间这一比例仅为5.5%。
英国银行的另一组数据显示,自2022, 以来,存放在税收优惠的个人储蓄账户(ISAs)和定期存款账户中的存款增长了70%,而零利率账户中的存款仅增长了15%。
借贷行为也在发生变化。信用卡债务达到历史新高,但产生利息的比例接近历史低点,因为越来越多的人每月偿还完整余额。高管表示,抵押贷款人同样变得更加警觉,并在固定期限接近到期时更快地切换贷款产品。
这对银行来说是一个坏消息,因为银行从客户的惰性中获益。这增加了大型贷款机构(如国家西部银行、劳埃德银行、巴克莱银行和汇丰银行)利润率压力,这些银行已经在与来自JPMorgan Chase UK和金融科技公司(如Monzo)等竞争者争夺存款的同时,面临着更大的竞争。上周,当分析师发现国家西部银行的利润率预测过于乐观时,该银行的股价下跌了近9%。
不过,也有积极的一面。更好的理财意味着更富有的客户。那些定期偿还信用卡余额的借款人在失业时不太可能违约,而那些稍微多储蓄一些的客户可能积累足够的首付,并成为抵押贷款客户。
大多数大型银行正在顺应潮流,努力减少对净利息边际的依赖,并扩大在财富管理等领域的业务,这些领域从拥有更富有客户中获益。


那种仅仅将现金吸入无息活期账户的做法,可能在未来几年内面临威胁。人工智能助手很快可能让最懒惰的客户也能像遵循储蓄最佳买家榜单的追随者一样行为。在这种情况下,高管们应该感谢能够提前一瞥未来。不如现在就适应,否则就会像被遗忘的黑麦面包发酵块一样被人遗忘。
NatWest is finding some pandemic-era habits hard to shake. Staff complained last month when the UK bank tried to make them spend more time in the office. And while customers may have cooled on some lockdown pursuits — pickling vegetables and baking sourdough bread, say — some financial habits from that era have stuck.
Saving money, for example. A rising household savings ratio suggests British consumers are conserving more income, and giving more thought to where they stick the extra cash. The amount being put aside for a rainy day averaged almost 9 per cent of earnings per quarter in the past three years, official data shows, compared with 5.5 per cent in the years 2017 to 2019.
Separate figures from the Bank of England show deposits in tax-efficient Isas and fixed-term savings accounts surged 70 per cent since the start of 2022, while money in zero-interest accounts rose just 15 per cent.
Borrowing behaviours are also shifting. Credit card debt is at a record high, but the proportion that racks up interest is close to a record low as more people pay off their full balance each month. Executives say mortgagors, likewise, have become more attentive and quick to switch deals when their fixed terms are close to expiring.
This is bad news for banks, which benefit from customer inertia. It adds to the pressure on profitability for large lenders such as NatWest, Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC, already grappling with increased competition for deposits from the likes of JPMorgan's Chase UK at one end and fintechs such as Monzo on the other. NatWest shares fell almost 9 per cent last week when analysts realised its profit margin forecasts were too optimistic.
There is a bright side. Better money management means richer customers. The borrower who routinely pays down their credit card balance is less likely to default if they lose their job, and the customer who saves a little more may gain enough for a house deposit, and become a mortgage customer.
Most of the big banks are skating where the puck is going with efforts to reduce their reliance on net interest margin and grow in areas such as wealth management, which benefits from having wealthier customers.


That's harder work than sucking up cash into interest-free current accounts, but that business model was likely to come under threat in the next few years. AI assistants could soon allow the laziest customer to behave like a follower of the savings best-buy tables. In which case, executives should be grateful for an early glimpse into the future. Better to adapt now than be forgotten like a sourdough starter.
对于欧洲旅客来说,廉价航班的黄金时代即将结束:航班数量减少,票价上涨。航空公司试图抵消高油价对利润造成的破坏。虽然许多航空公司在讨论成本削减,但乘客也将承担一部分负担。
廉价航空面临最严峻的挑战。廉价航空冠军瑞安航空(Ryanair)周一公布了可能的成本削减计划,希望缓解其明年燃油成本增加€2的影响。
全服务航空公司也不例外。德国汉莎航空(Lufthansa)正忙于整合意大利航空公司ITA,并收购葡萄牙TAP航空公司的大部分股份,昨日下调了全年利润预测的高端。其燃油成本上涨了五分之一,尽管有金融对冲措施在实施中。
除了高油价,航空公司还受到中东炼油能力减少的影响,加上俄乌战争制裁导致的炼油能力损失。该地区的喷气燃油在过去三个月内每吨交易价格超过$1,200,而美国在2月份袭击伊朗前,该价格约为$800,使得对明年需求进行对冲变得昂贵,且风险较大,如果价格下跌。
廉价航空公司的利润空间将更加受到挤压,因为它们从一开始就缺乏削减成本的空间。根据可视尔阿尔法(Visible Alpha)调查的分析师预测,燃油将占瑞安航空明年收入的44%,较今年上升至37%。而对于英国航空母公司国际航空集团(IAG)和德国汉莎航空(Lufthansa)来说,燃油成本预计将占收入的四分之一到五分之一,与今年持平。
廉价航空公司也无法依赖更富裕的头等舱乘客,他们似乎对涨价异常宽容;汉莎航空的头等舱服务帮助其收入增长了8%。减少运力是一个明显的应对措施。但如果燃油价格保持目前水平,16%的收入增长将帮助瑞安航空抵消额外成本,巴克莱分析师估计。
对于乘客来说,这是一个痛苦的涨价,因为爱尔兰航空公司瑞安航空目前的单程平均票价为€56。瑞安航空首席执行官迈克尔·奥莱里(Michael O'Leary)表示,廉价航班端的票价近期正以“中单位数”的速度上涨,预计随着行业进入冬季(字面和隐喻意义上),票价将进一步大幅上涨。唯一的安慰是,廉价乘客曾经享受了如此长时间的低价。
Coming down the runway for Europe's travellers: fewer flights at higher prices. Airlines are trying to contain the damage wrought on their profit by persistently high fuel prices. While many are talking about cost cuts, passengers will share the burden too.
Budget airlines face the toughest task. Low-cost champion Ryanair on Monday outlined potential trims it hopes will ease the impact of a €2bn rise in its fuel bill in its next financial year.
Full-service carriers aren't immune, though. Lufthansa, busy integrating Italian carrier ITA as well as taking on a large minority holding in Portugal's TAP, yesterday lowered the high end of its full-year profit forecast. Its fuel costs have risen a fifth, even with financial hedges in place.
John Gapper London Gateway's rise shows if you build it, they will come BUSINESS INSIGHT
As well as high oil prices, airlines are also suffering from a reduction in refining capacity from the Middle East on top of that already lost from sanctions on Russia. Jet fuel in the region has traded above \$1,200 a tonne for the past three months compared with about \$800 before the US attacked Iran in February, making it costly to hedge next year's needs — and risky, should prices fall.
The margin squeeze will be worse for budget airlines, which start out with less room to cut costs. Fuel will soak up 44 per cent of Ryanair's revenue next year, according to analysts polled by Visible Alpha, up from 37 per cent this year. For British Airways owner IAG and for Lufthansa, on the other hand, fuel is expected to be between a quarter and a fifth, unchanged from this year.
Nor can low-cost carriers rely on wealthier premium travellers, who seem strangely tolerant of rising prices; Lufthansa's premium services helped it to an 8 per cent rise in revenue. Capacity cuts are an obvious place to hunker down. But if fuel prices stay roughly where they are, Ryanair would need a 16 per cent jump in revenue next year to offset its extra costs fully, Barclays analysts estimate.
That's a painful rise for its customers when the Irish airline's current average one-way fare is €56. Prices at the budget end have recently been increasing by "mid single digits" according to Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary, who expects them to rise much more as the industry heads into winter, literally and metaphorically. The only consolation is that budget passengers had it so good for so long.
1 这个技艺高超的工匠有偏见(7)
2 坚定的共产主义信念(5)
3 在沙发上舒服时,我能继续吃(9)
4 不幸的是,错过了收获时节,没有萝卜(4,2,6)
1 ——
6 访问亲戚时,轮流参观著名广场(5)
7 详细扭曲的基督教说教(9)
8 汽车赛事主管被给予治疗玩具(7)
11 ——
15 疯狂的故事讲述者收集作业后休息(9)
17 ——
18 鹿被分成部分,逃脱马和驴(7)
18 ——
20 最终著名五人组混淆在脑海中,看(7)
22 不得不携带谷物罐(5)
23 资深退役军人?(5)
1 Positive this skilled tradesperson is biased (7)
2 Firm about communist beliefs (5)
3 At home on sofa I enjoyed being able to carry on eating (9)
4 The wrong time of year unfortunately, so no radishes (4,2,6)
6 When visiting rellies, taking turn about remarkable Square (5)
7 Detailed twisted Christian harangue (9)
8 Motorsport director is given therapeutic toys (7)
11 Fodder one's gathered in for your old rat (7,5)
15 Dotty storyteller collects homework after a break (9)
17 Aged college dons close to retiring support singer (9)
18 Deer in bits OK, escaping horse and donkey (7)
20 Ultimately Famous Five are muddled in head, see (7)
22 Had to carry grain jar (5)
23 Senior ex-army man? (5)\*


Register now
banking.live.ft.com
WEDNESDAY 4 NOVEMBER 2026

How a \$20bn fraud burnt Turkey's investors BIG READ, PAGE 21
UK £3.70; Republic of Ireland €4.10
Will the AI boom differ from any other mania?
MARTIN WOLF, PAGE 23
Voters cast their midterms ballots yesterday in West Columbia, South Carolina. Millions of voters headed to the polls for congressional races – from Maine to Alaska, and Texas to Michigan – set to deliver a verdict on Donald Trump's second term.
The president's Republican Party was at risk of defeats in both chambers of Congress as voters soured on his handling of the economy, his war against Iran, his abrasive style and his family's enrichment while in office.
More than 59mn ballots had been cast before yesterday in postal votes, a figure suggesting turnout on the day would be high. Polls close from 6pm EST, with the first results expected soon after and continuing into the early hours as voting closed in the west. There were also 36 gubernatorial races and votes on policy ideas, such as a wealth tax in California. Trump's Israel pledge page 4

Sam Wolfe/Reuters
\- Chipmaker curbs cloud providers
ZIJING WU — HONG KONG
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
ELEANOR OLCOTT — LONDON
Nvidia has ordered its data centre partners to reduce their exposure to Chinese customers, further hampering China's ability to keep up with the US in the AI superpower race.
The world's largest chipmaker has told cloud computing clients they must sell at least 51 per cent of their services to non-Chinese companies, according to people with knowledge of the matter. No restrictions existed previously.
The instructions have been communicated verbally and conveyed by Nvidia's sales teams rather than spelt out in documents, the people said.
The move means Chinese tech companies face a new threat to their AI ambitions as Washington moves to restrict the access to advanced US chips they had through overseas cloud computing deals. Many Chinese groups had relied on such leases for advanced AI tasks, including model training.
The compliance rules apply to Nvidia's clients globally and not just data centres in Asia, two of the people said. They affect future contracts rather than existing leasing agreements.
"Longstanding US policy encourages
every cloud to build on American infrastructure and to win business everywhere they can," Nvidia said. "America's longstanding policy has always supported the build-out of American infrastructure worldwide, bringing prosperity, influence, and jobs home."
Nvidia imposed the requirement over the summer in an effort to reduce the criticism it receives regularly from US lawmakers and other critics of its approach to China, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The US is seeking to clamp down both on intermediaries that have helped create a thriving black market for Nvidia's chips in China, and on Chinese companies' access to advanced chips through overseas leasing deals.
Cloud providers have, however, struggled to comply with the curbs because it is “difficult to find enough non-Chinese clients outside the US”, said a Singapore-based group. “If strictly implemented, it will definitely hurt business.”
Nvidia's crackdown has also fuelled a severe shortage of advanced computing power for Chinese tech companies. A rack of Nvidia's B300 chips, which sells for about \$600,000, last month fetched Rmb18.5mn (\$2.8mn) in China because of their scarcity, according to a person with knowledge of the deal.
Nvidia had already more than halved the number of Asian customers authorised to buy its AI chips after it created a “white list” of groups that had passed tough compliance checks aimed at preventing the products from reaching China. That meant fewer Nvidia chips being smuggled into China, forcing more Chinese groups to pursue leasing deals with overseas cloud providers.
The US and China are by far the largest sources of demand for computing power, while Chinese tech groups have been the biggest clients for data centres in regions such as south-east Asia.
Nvidia's move has also prompted data centres outside the US to search desperately for clients that are not Chinese. They could be forced to shrink the scale of their operations if they cannot do so.
Nvidia shares have fallen more than 13 per cent in the past month but remain 7 per cent higher this year. The recent dip in the stock means Jensen Huang's group has been overtaken by Apple as the world's most valuable company.
FT View page 22
▶ Poundland owners face grilling from angry MPs
US distressed investor Gordon Brothers will be hauled before members within days to explain its role in the discount retailer's looming insolvency. One of the biggest high street failures puts 12,000 jobs at risk.— PAGE 12
▶ Push for leaders' meeting
Officials are discussing a possible meeting later this month between Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin when the three leaders attend the Apec summit in Shenzhen, China.— PAGE 4
▶ Binance lifts lid on heist
The crypto exchange has said the attackers who stole \$6.3bn last week set up fake job interviews to trick one of its software engineers into installing malicious code.
— PAGE 9; MARKETS INSIGHT, PAGE 14
▶ Lifetime pension offer
Private sector workers will be given the automatic right to a lifetime pension income under plans that unwind moves to give pensioners freedom over their money in retirement.— PAGE 2
▶ Bill backs green energy
An “energy independence bill” is to be presented to parliament that forces green energy groups to invest in communities hosting their projects, in a bid to rebuild support for net zero.— PAGE 2
▶ Apollo \$114bn AI splurge
The New York private capital group has poured premiums from its insurance clients into the AI boom at a frenzied pace, lending a record \$114bn in the third quarter.— PAGE 10; FT VIEW, PAGE 22
▶ Trump to cut Israel aid
The US president has said that Washington will stop providing military aid at the year's end. The US gives \$4bn annually to Israel in a 10-year agreement that is set to expire in 2028.— PAGE 4
Australia raises rates The central bank has increased interest rates to an 18-year high as it warned inflation remained above target in an economy grappling with joblessness and a house price collapse.—PAGE 8

Rio Tinto is joining the fight to stop one of Australia's most invasive species wreaking havoc on wildlife. The mining group is spending \$20mn working with scientists to forge a 40km by 400km 'kill zone' for the marauding cane toad, which was introduced a century ago to feast on a sugarcane-eating beetle but ended up devouring everything. By attacking biodiversity in the iron-rich Pilbara area, they would make Rio's mine applications harder and costlier. Toad invasion ▶ PAGE 10
LUCY FISHER AND JULIE STEINBERG
The Conservatives have turned to Lord David Cameron to rally supporters and boost fundraising, with the former prime minister wooing donors with top billing at party events.
Cameron, who took the Conservatives into power in the 2010 general election, has also been speaking regularly to party leader Kemi Badenoch, according to people familiar with the matter.
His return coincides with the Tories' overtaking Reform UK in the polls for the first time in almost two years, a milestone in the party's nascent recovery after the rout at the last election.
The Tories climbed to an average of 22.1 per cent, up from a low of 16 per cent last autumn, according to the FT's poll tracker, passing Reform on 21.9 per cent, for the first time in 22 months.
The party still lags behind Labour, which continues to enjoy stronger support under Andy Burnham, rising to 29.2 per cent in the FT's poll of polls.
Cameron had already been asked to assist Badenoch with Prime Minister's Questions, as reported by the FT this year, and has been credited in part for her improvement at the despatch box at the weekly Commons showdown.
He has now been calling existing and lapsed Tory donors to entice them back into the tent and to open their wallets.
"If an election is called soon, the Tories suffer from a very damaged brand but they need financial resources to stand any chance of being competitive," said a person familiar with matters.
Cameron is the star attraction at next month's Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Association event, for which tickets cost up to £345 a seat. Billing it as “a rare chance to hear [Cameron’s] reflections on leadership, Britain’s place in the world and the Conservative future”, the association website invites donations alongside bookings.
Cameron is also set to address the annual pre-Christmas lunch of centre-right think-tank Onward.
"I've noticed that David seems to be doing more," said Sir Simon Clarke, Onward director. "He's a big draw and the only person still alive who's led the Conservatives back into government, so he is uniquely qualified to talk about that journey and make sure we get the policy as well as the politics right."
People close to Cameron said he supported the party and Badenoch and had a history of helping fundraising efforts.
The Conservatives did not respond to requests for comment. Cameron's office declined to comment.

© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026
No: 42,399 ★
Printed in London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Dublin, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul, Dubai

9"770307"176135"
STOCK MARKETS | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | S&P 500 | 7580.85 | 7541.40 | 0.52 | Nasdaq Composite | 25351.86 | 25164.36 | 0.75 | Dow Jones Ind | 51806.64 | 51983.98 | -0.34 | Euro Stoxx 50 | 6144.56 | 6176.06 | -0.51 | FTSEurofirst 300 | 2573.69 | 2589.34 | -0.60 | FTSE 100 | 10638.43 | 10761.33 | -1.14 | FTSE All-Share | 5746.54 | 5808.28 | -1.06 | CAC 40 | 8020.31 | 8047.69 | -0.34 | Xetra Dax | 25864.62 | 25981.09 | -0.45 | Nikkei | Closed | 63081.86 | - | Hang Seng | 23525.97 | 23393.32 | 0.57 | MSCI World | 4885.00 | 4865.00 | 0.41 | MSCI EM | 1578.20 | 1553.50 | 1.59 | MSCI ACWI | 1122.30 | 1116.40 | 0.53 | World Markets
CURRENCIES | Pair | Nov 03 | Prev | Pair | Nov 03 | Prev | $/€ | 1.119 | 1.119 | €/$ | 0.893 | 0.894 | $/£ | 1.342 | 1.341 | £/$ | 0.745 | 0.746 | £/€ | 0.834 | 0.834 | €/£ | 1.198 | 1.198 | ¥/$ | 158.445 | 157.815 | ¥/€ | 177.371 | 176.619 | ¥/£ | 212.562 | 211.669 | £ Index | 86.310 | 86.30 | Sfr/€ | 0.919 | 0.915 | Sfr/£ | 1.101 | 1.097 | CRYPTO | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | Bitcoin | 77650.90 | 77403.41 | 0.32 | Ethereum | 2294.85 | 2267.10 | 1.22 | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | Oil WTI | 95.97 | 96.46 | -0.51 | Oil Brent $ | 103.46 | 104.77 | -1.25 | Gold $ | 3927.06 | 3967.51 | -1.02 | GOVERNMENT BONDS | Yield (%) | Nov 03 | Prev | Chg | US 2 Yr | 4.63 | 4.59 | 0.04 | US 10 Yr | 4.96 | 4.88 | 0.08 | US 30 Yr | 5.33 | 5.25 | 0.08 | UK 2 Yr | 4.85 | 4.79 | 0.06 | UK 10 Yr | 5.26 | 5.20 | 0.06 | UK 30 Yr | 5.70 | 5.63 | 0.07 | JPN 2 Yr | 1.86 | 1.86 | 0.00 | JPN 10 Yr | 2.80 | 2.79 | 0.01 | JPN 30 Yr | 3.94 | 3.94 | 0.00 | GER 2 Yr | 3.04 | 3.03 | 0.01 | GER 10 Yr | 3.31 | 3.29 | 0.02 | GER 30 Yr | 3.69 | 3.66 | 0.03 | Prices are latest for edition Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com
Why have one holiday home when you can have access to luxury homes across Europe, Asia and Africa within one structured co-ownership model?
THE HIDEAWAYS CLUB
thehideawaysclub.com

Investment in this scheme is restricted to certified high net worth individuals or sophisticated investors. Evidence of certification will be required before detailed information is provided. The value of this investment can fall as well as rise, so it carries a risk to your capital and investors may receive less than the amount invested. It may also be difficult to sell the investment and sometimes, it may be impossible to sell at any price. Do not invest unless you have carefully considered whether you can afford the risks and whether the investment is suitable for you. This financial promotion has been issued by Valley Financial Services Inc., 2019, by Gibraltar Securities, Marina Bay, Gibraltar, authorities of the Northern Alternative Investment and Manager of the United States or its associates with the United States (or its associates with the United States) and the United States (or its associates with the United States).
NATIONAL
Renewables
Bill will place legal duty on projects to provide funds for communities
JIM PICKARD AND RACHEL MILLARD
LONDON
Renewable energy companies will be legally obliged to invest in the communities where they build projects as ministers seek to boost public support for net zero at a time of fracturing political consensus on tackling climate change.
Communities would also be given the right to buy up to 20 per cent of a renewable energy project near them — up from the current 5 per cent — and would also apply to smaller schemes of at least 1 megawatt for the first time.
A new “energy independence bill” will be laid before parliament today to set out the measures, which mark a change from the existing system of voluntary support.
It follows the government's announcement last week that its priority was "first and foremost cheaper energy, with clean power key to achieving this" in an apparent scaling back of the "mission" to decarbonise the entire power system by 2030.
According to the latest public attitudes tracker conducted by the business department this summer, almost eight in 10 people were concerned about climate change, while 51 per cent expected the long-term impact of net zero to be positive. Seventy-nine per cent supported the use of renewable energy.
But both the Conservatives and Reform UK have pledged to scrap the legally binding target of decarbonising the entire economy by 2050 – signed into law in 2019 by then prime minister Theresa May — arguing that doing so would help bring down energy costs.
Under the measures to be included in the bill, community benefit funds will be mandatory for all such schemes over 5MW. Groups will have to strike legally binding agreements with communities, which then decide how money is spent.
At present, some developers fund sports fields or community centres or other infrastructure when they build solar farms or onshore wind farms, but the system is an ad hoc “patchwork approach” to support.
The government will propose that eligible projects must provide a minimum amount of compensation, with £5,000 per megawatt of power a year for wind projects and £700 per megawatt for solar schemes. That money can go towards projects picked by local leaders, ranging from football pitches to skills training for young people or household grants to tackle fuel poverty.
“Currently, there is a patchwork approach to how communities benefit from hosting renewable energy projects,” one official said. “Some receive financial support, while others see little in return, despite hosting the clean power Britain needs to protect households from volatile global fossil fuel markets.”
Officials reassured the industry that further secondary legislation will be needed to implement these measures.
The legislation will also be used to put a new body called Great British Grid, part of Great British Energy, on a statutory footing. GBG will compete with the FTSE 100 company National Grid and other network owners to support the delivery of grid upgrades.
The plan to let communities have a stake in local renewable projects is part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham's broader desire to give voters greater control over utilities.
The energy independence bill, announced in the King's Speech in May, comprises a broad mix of energy policies. It is expected to include a legal commitment to Labour's manifesto pledge to end new exploration licences in the North Sea and to ban fracking.
Miatta Fahnbulleh, energy secretary, said the government wanted to make sure local people benefited from projects in their community.
“This means more of the benefits staying in local communities, rather than passing them by,” she said. “Because if your community helps power Britain, it should share in the rewards.”

Rifts widen in unionist party
after most popular MP quits
in boost for rival Sinn Féin
JUDE WEBBER — DUBLIN
Northern Ireland's biggest pro-UK party is under pressure to prevent further splits after its most popular MP resigned over the handling of a planned Protestant parade through a nationalist area.
The announcement by Carla Lockhart that she was quitting the Democratic Unionist Party to sit as an independent has left the DUP with its lowest number of MPs for 25 years.
Her decision is the latest blow for the DUP as the party struggles to regain momentum against its energised nationalist rival Sinn Féin ahead of regional elections due next May.
The MP for Upper Bann said on Mon-
day she was making the decision
because the party had refused to force
out Michelle O'Neill, the Sinn Féin first
minister, from the region's Stormont
executive over her decision to join pro-
tests blocking a planned Protestant
parade from Drumcree church in a
largely Catholic area of Portadown.
No one has yet followed Lockhart. But what she saw as the DUP's weak response to the parade dispute has left the party "in a considerable mess", said Owen Polley, a unionism commentator.
Lockhart's departure means the DUP, which had 10 MPs in 2017 when its support kept then prime minister Theresa May in power, now has four MPs.
“Her seat was the safest by some margin . . . it suggests there’s a growing problem with the grassroots and just with confidence in what the party’s doing,” Polley added.
Northern Ireland's most contentious Protestant parade had been banned since 1998. But the Orange Order was given the surprise go-ahead to march in September, prompting a nationalist outcry. Weeks of stand-off and legal action ensued before Northern Ireland secretary Sir Chris Bryant halted it last month.
The High Court in Belfast last week upheld his decision.
The DUP and other unionist parties
Out of step: Portadown Orange Lodge marchers. Below, Carla Lockhart Charles McQuillan/Getty

have branded O'Neill a lawbreaker for helping block the parade. It is not yet clear if she will face charges.
Lockhart had wanted the DUP to withdraw its deputy first minister, Emma Little-Pengelly, from Stormont to force out O'Neill, since it is a shared office under Northern Ireland's power-sharing rules. Instead, the DUP has agreed only to cease joint activities.
Sinn Féin, by contrast, has been boosted. The party is the largest in Stormont but has failed to deliver on key concerns of its own voters – such as construction of a Gaelic Games stadium – while the executive has failed to agree a budget.
While Drumcree “has backfired for unionism”, the bounce for Sinn Féin “has made it much easier to evade questions about its record in government”, said Sam McBride, Northern Ireland editor of the Belfast Telegraph.
A More in Common poll last week found Sinn Féin had enjoyed a fillip, rising to 30 per cent in Stormont voting intention. That was 5 points higher than a More in Common poll in July and compared with a five-year low rating of 22 per cent in a Lucid Talk poll earlier this year. The DUP languished on 18 per cent in the More in Common poll.
Furthermore, “you’ve gone from having a really dominant DUP, which you’ve had since the early 2000s, to it now being only a plurality of unionism, rather than a majority of unionism, with 43 per cent of the unionist vote going to the DUP in our poll,” said Conleth Burns, associate director of More in Common.
With Stormont elections looming, the dispute “has acted like a clarion call to loyalists and republicans alike”, said Katy Hayward, professor of political sociology at Queen’s University in Belfast. But while Sinn Féin was turning
'Her seat was the safest by some margin . . . it suggests there's a growing problem with the grassroots'
that into electoral gain, unionists were riven by differences, such as whether to continue or collapse Stormont.
Discomfort among some unionists at sharing power with nationalists “will always be exploited by hardliners to gain political ground. But such ground is always taken from other unionists, not from nationalists,” Hayward said.
A Lucid Talk poll in the summer placed the DUP on 15 per cent, one point behind its smaller, more moderate rival the Ulster Unionist Party.
That result also reflected voter anger at the conviction of former leader Jeffrey Donaldson on child sex and rape charges. He has since been sentenced to 15 years.
Meanwhile, Stormont limps on but has failed to agree a budget over what all parties say is insufficient funding from London. Further talks between the parties and Bryant are due this week.
Retirement
ALAN LIVSEY, CHRIS SMYTH AND CALUM KAPOOR — LONDON
Private sector workers will be given the automatic right to a lifetime pension income under government plans that unwind previous moves to give pensioners freedom over their money in retirement.
The shift, outlined in a consultation by the Department for Work and Pensions launched yesterday, aims to ensure older people do not run out of money in the years after they leave the workforce.
Under the new plan, known as a guided retirement, millions of savers' pension contributions would be pooled to offer "a fully managed pension people can rely on for life".
This will provide an option to those retirees who do not want to make investment decisions on their portfolios during their later lives.
David Cameron's Conservative government had granted pensioners greater freedom to build their pension plans as they wished, such as making their own decisions about which assets to invest in. However, the move was criticised for in essence forcing people to become investment experts.
“Too many people reach retirement with no clear plan for turning their savings into a reliable income that will last for life,” according to the consultation.
Ministers have praised the success of pension auto-enrolment in encouraging millions to secure more for retirement and describe the latest proposals as an attempt to apply a similar principle to the same group of savers.
Torsten Bell, pensions minister, said the plan “will offer a simpler way to turn savings into income, regardless of which workplace pension people have”.
DWP estimates that almost half of those savers accessing their pension pots for the first time choose to withdraw the entire amount, with the risk that they will have nothing left near the end of their lives.
“It’s unrealistic to expect millions of individuals to suddenly become retirement income experts,” said Kirsty Ross at the People’s Pension, a workplace pension provider.
Although pensioners have long had the option to use their pension savings to buy an income annuity, the new scheme will mean that members' pension pots will be held in a range of asset classes. This could provide better growth over time than an annuity, most of which are not adjusted for inflation.
Simon Eagle, collective defined contribution pensions expert at consultants WTW, said the scheme is expected to give an income 40 per cent higher on average than a typical annuity.
But Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister, said that although the government wanted to ensure a certain retirement income, "people don't want to take everything they've got and spread it thin – they want chunks at the start".
Another problem with the proposal, he added, is that pensioners could end up “stuck for life” with a guided retirement scheme if they did not opt out within the first 12 months based on HM Revenue & Customs guidance.
Although the new retirement collective schemes should offer a guaranteed income for life, the amount of potential income is unlikely to be assured.
FT FINANCIAL TIMES
MAKE A WISE INVESTMENT
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
DELPHINE STRAUSS
British workers are increasingly disengaged from their jobs and have become less willing to go the extra mile to help their employer, according to a survey that lends substance to claims that productivity has suffered from a wave of so-called “quiet quitting” in the aftermath of the pandemic.
Analysis of data from the British Social Attitudes survey, published yesterday by the Resolution Foundation think-tank, shows employees have become more disengaged in the past 10 years and less willing to put in extra effort. There is also a sharp drop in the proportion who want full-time hours — a change that has been driven by men.
One in four workers was not even “fairly” satisfied with their main job – the gloomiest in the survey’s 35-year history and up from one in five when the question was last asked in 2015.
among managers and professionals.
The proportion willing to work harder than required to help their employer succeed, which had previously risen steadily since the 1990s, fell from 69 per cent in 2015 to 55 per cent last year, with the biggest drop in commitment seen
The idea that workers have been “quiet quitting” — a supposed post-pandemic trend of people limiting their efforts to essential duties — “is quite literally what the evidence shows”, said Hannah Slaughter, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation think-tank, which conducted the analysis.
The BSA's findings fitted the post-pandemic zeitgeist of people “feeling they want to prioritise other things in their life”, Slaughter said, and “could have knock-on implications for productivity", helping to explain its recent weakness.
Data problems make it hard to tell how UK productivity growth has evolved since Covid but the latest revisions still point to a period of extreme weakness with only tentative recent improvement.

Many staff are less likely to put in extra effort at work — Toby Melville/Reuters
Slaughter said the post-Covid shift towards working from home could help explain why people felt less committed to their employer. But she noted that people could also be less willing to make extra effort because employers were already asking more of them — even as opportunities for advancement, better pay or more autonomy are drying up.
There are longstanding concerns over work becoming more intense and less secure in low-paid sectors, Slaughter noted.
But the BSA's findings also show a sharp rise over the past decade, from 25 per cent to 36 per cent, in the share of managers and professionals who find it difficult to take an hour or two off for personal reasons — consistent with hybrid workers feeling “always on”.
At the same time, the share of workers who saw opportunities to advance in their job fell from 35 per cent in 2015 to 25 per cent last year.
Slaughter said it was striking how “broad-based” the sense of disengagement was across age groups and occupational groupings, with the sharpest fall in willingness to work harder seen among managers and professionals.
The fall in job satisfaction was far larger among men than women, as was a shift in preference for part-time over full-time hours.
The UK has been ageing more slowly than other countries Share of people aged 70 or over
NATIONAL
Economic, social and political upheavals expected as rapid increase in numbers comes to an end


High migration= 455,000 net migration yearly; low migration = 105,000 net migration yearly; principal projection = 230,000 net migration yearly and long-term fertility at 1.42; high fertility variant = long term fertility at 1.62; low fertility variant = long term fertility at 1.22
Source: FT analysis of ONS data

Sources: UN population projections; ONS • Fertility rates refer to England and Wales

Source: UN population forecasts, 2026


Source: Department for Work and Pensions
Source: ONS
VALENTINA ROMEI
ECONOMICS REPORTER
In the 1970s, the UK experienced industrial unrest, soaring inflation and a wave of emigration. Its population stopped growing for the first sustained period since the second world war.
Half a century later, the country may be on the verge of a similar moment.
Britain's population – whose robust rise has inflamed politics over the past decade – is on course to grow only marginally over the next few years.
It could peak in the mid-2030s, with far-reaching consequences for the economy and society. Already growth has slowed, with numbers rising just 0.3 per cent to 69.5mn in the year to mid-2025. That was the slowest rate since 1998 excluding the pandemic.
Deaths are expected to outnumber births from 2026, according to official projections, leaving migration as the sole driver of population growth.
But net migration itself is dropping. Last week, the Office for Budget Responsibility cut its forecast for net migration to 120,000 this year and an average of 182,000 a year between 2026 and 2031. That compares with nearly 300,000 forecast a year last November.
"When looking at the next few years, net migration will almost certainly decline because of policy restrictions; fewer people are now coming to the UK," said Ben Brindle, senior researcher at the Migration Observatory. Over the next five years, Brindle doesn't expect "much population change at all".
In the spring, the Office for National Statistics projected that the UK population would peak in 2054, with the expansion exclusively driven by a net migration of 230,000 a year.
But if these projections are adjusted to take into account the OBR's latest migration forecast, a different picture emerges: the population would grow only marginally then peak in the mid-2030s. By the mid-2070s, it would have fallen about 6mn from its peak.
Some parts of the country, including Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, are already seeing populations flatlining. London registered its first decline since the pandemic, in contrast with its rapid expansion during the 2010s.
Whether the total population declines depends on the immigration measures pursued unless there is a rebound in births. That is difficult to predict. Shabana Mahmood, the Labour home secretary, this week softened some restrictions on permanent residency.

The UK-EU youth mobility scheme, under discussion, could increase migration, as could rejoining the EU.
In contrast, Nigel Farage, Reform UK's leader, has called the population "explosion" the country's "single biggest problem", arguing it has damaged quality of life. Should Reform take power, its plans imply at least 2mn people would have to leave.
The UK has so far been relatively insulated from the demographic pressures facing other advanced economies. It has had higher fertility rates than Japan, Italy, Spain and South Korea.
"The ageing trend is more gradual . . . but the need for policy action still exists," said Willem Adema, a senior economist at the OECD.
Perhaps the most noticeable change so far has been school closures, as the number of children falls. Across England, 86 per cent of primary schools had unfilled places.
"We could see people in many
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood has eased some rules
areas disappear, because you can get to a point where there aren't people in those areas to run basic services, things like GP surgeries and schools, but also shops and restaurants," said Brindle of the Migration Observatory.
The population stagnating or declining could ease pressures on housing, infrastructure and the environment, many experts argue. Andrew Scott, professor of economics at the University of Oxford, also points to a “longevity dividend” — the economic and social gains from people living longer, healthier and more productive lives.
But the OECD and other organisations warn that declining fertility rates put future generations' prosperity at risk.
The UK is raising its retirement age to 67. But asking people to work for longer is not straightforward. Britain's employment rate falls from 83 per cent at age 50 to just 58 per cent at age 62.
“Health, social care and pension spending will rise, while the tax base grows more slowly,” said Jonathan
Portes, professor of economics and public policy at King's College London. Persistently low fertility “may also create labour shortages” in crucial sectors.
The OBR warned this summer that UK public debt was on an “unsustainable” long-term path, partly because of demographic shifts. Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced plans to adjust the triple lock on the state pension from 2030 to contain spending and help fund a National Care Service.
Sarah Harper, professor of gerontology at the University of Oxford, called for comprehensive policies to support longer working lives, including life-long learning, alongside affordable childcare and housing, better parental leave and more flexible working arrangements.
One way of offsetting the economic and fiscal pressures is through higher productivity via AI. The technology could help ease labour shortages and boost output per hour worked.
The end of rapid population growth is likely to shift Britain's political debate.
Farage, for example, has started to focus less on the raw numbers of immigrants and more on alleged failures of social integration.
More broadly, politics may react to the fact that voters skew older. That, ironically, may mean it becomes hard to implement the policy changes that experts say are necessary: an older electorate is less likely to vote in favour of pension cuts and help for students.
In the 1970s, the UK's population decline lasted for a few years, with another brief spell in the early 1980s. This time it may be similarly brief. "We could return to [past rates of population growth] after about five years," said Brindle of the Migration Observatory.
As demography changes, government will have an opportunity to respond, said Tony Travers, professor at the London School of Economics. “Enough of the population will accept some immigration, but it has to make sense, and with a very powerful sense that it’s a managed number,” he added.
Brussels summit
PETER FOSTER, GEORGE PARKER AND ANDY BOUNDS
Prime Minister Andy Burnham's promised “reset” deal with Brussels is unlikely to receive a final sign-off at this month's landmark EU-UK summit after the bloc demanded an agreement on cheaper access to British universities be struck first.
A draft joint statement being worked on by EU officials says that while pacts on several issues under discussion could be finalised by the November 20 meeting, they will only be put into effect once the UK reduces tuition fees for EU students.
The statement, seen by the FT, is still being negotiated by the two sides, but British officials concede the implementation of any “reset” package – which will include cutting barriers to trade in food – will be contingent on the issue of university fees being resolved.
The EU wants the UK to allow students from the bloc to pay the same fees as British counterparts and has proposed a deadline of six months for a deal on this to be struck. Brussels is determined any agreement should apply to all EU students and not just those going to the UK as part of a so-called “youth experience scheme”, which will have a cap on the number of places available.
A deal on fees is likely to cost British universities hundreds of millions of pounds as they would no longer be able to charge EU students overseas rates, often three or four times the £9,790-per-year cost for those in the UK.
Both sides are hopeful of finishing talks ahead of the summit to reduce trade barriers for foodstuffs, the linking of carbon markets and the youth mobility scheme, which will allow 18- to 30-year-olds to study, work and travel in each other's countries.
However, the draft joint statement seen by the FT, which has been drafted by the EU but not agreed to by the UK, references the “conclusion of negotiations” on these three deals in the future rather than them being officially signed off at the summit. An EU diplomat said: “The real issue is whether we decide legally on signing and applying [these three deals] only after the tuition-fee negotiations yield results.”
EU ambassadors meeting in Brussels today are likely to back the idea.
A British official signalled the prime minister was engaged in “tough talks” with Brussels but was keen to open university doors to overseas students.
"The prime minister sees real value in helping our universities attract the best students from around the world, and is proud that top international students want to come to our world-class universities," the official added.
There are still issues to resolve in the proposed “reset” agreements, including how many people could access the youth experience scheme annually, according to officials. The EU wants 150,000 visas a year while the UK initially offered 50,000. The UK under Burnham’s predecessor Sir Keir Starmer was willing to compromise on 100,000.
For its part, the UK is seeking to use a deal on tuition fees to push for improved participation in the bloc's “Made in Europe” procurement and subsidy scheme, which Burnham has warned poses a serious threat to UK industries.
The Cabinet Office said it would not comment on leaks or provide a running commentary on live negotiations.
The European Commission has been approached for comment.
DELPHINE STRAUSS AND DAVID SHEPPARD
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood has scrapped her plan to make foreign care workers wait longer to win permanent UK residency – but the concession only softens the edges of what remains a radical reform of the immigration system.
Plans set out on Monday will delay settlement for around half a million people already in the UK, the Home Office estimates.
They will create a new class of people whose status is essentially temporary — with refugees facing waits of up to 30 years if they arrive by unauthorised routes.
It remains unclear whether the reforms will bring the fiscal benefits claimed.
What does this mean for migrants working outside the care sector? Skilled workers with earnings below £50,270 will now face a 10-year wait for permanent residency, as will their dependants – incurring visa fees running into tens of thousands of pounds. This group is estimated to number almost a quarter of a million.
Immigration lawyers say professionals in sectors such as architecture, accountancy and engineering will be affected – and that their employers may struggle to keep them on, as they may have not have budgeted for ongoing visa fees.
"We will definitely have clients in that position," said Katie Newbury, partner at law firm Kingsley Napley.
However, high earners and their employers are potential winners from the reforms, with those in the top tax bracket able to gain the right to live indefinitely in the UK after three years – down from the current five.
High earners' partners, however, will not always be able to settle at the same time, and it remains unclear what the new rules mean for children.
International students in particular could face bigger barriers to settling in the UK in future, as the government has scrapped the “Long Residence” route. That had allowed them to qualify for permanent residency after 10 years, counting time spent on temporary study and graduate visas.
Because visa rules are already much tougher than in the past, many workers who come to the UK in future will be higher-rate taxpayers able to settle after five years, said Marley Morris, associate director at the think-tank IPPR.
However, even the top earners the government wants to attract to the UK may be deterred by uncertainty over the status of family members, lawyers said.
The government's revised plans now leave open a path to settlement for non-working partners, provided joint household income is high enough.
Children who turn 18 while their parents are waiting for settlement will be on the same track – meaning they may be unable to leave home, or attend a UK university on the lower fees available to permanent residents.
Zeena Luchowa, partner at the law firm Laura Devine, said she had already seen “senior individuals” change their minds about coming to the UK halfway through the process, because of the last year's uncertainty over the reforms.
That remains to be seen. The new rules make it harder for many migrants who are granted refugee status to achieve the long-term right to remain in the country, particularly if they arrive via small boats.
That could reduce the incentive for migrants to attempt “small boat” crossings from France.
Asylum seekers who did not come to the UK as part of a formal government resettlement scheme will need to wait 20 years for settlement, though this can be shortened to 10 years if they enter “sustained” work or study. The clock would only start once work or study commences.
Those who tried to circumvent UK border controls, for example by arriving on small boats, will need to wait an additional 10 years. Arrivals by small boats are already down more than 40 per cent so far in 2026, partly due to greater co-operation between Britain and France.
The UK estimates the reforms would cut the benefits bill by billions. But the Home Office has not published an impact assessment.
Analysts say claims of big fiscal gains were always overblown, even before the concession to care workers seen as the biggest potential risk to taxpayers.
This is because, although the reforms delay the point at which people claim working-age benefits, the biggest fiscal costs of migration come later, as migrants' children go through school and as people retire.
The Home Office acknowledged that the overall fiscal impact of the reforms would depend on whether they ended up deterring or attracting top earners, and on the incentives they created for refugees and other low-paid migrants to earn more. Some skilled workers will now find it harder to move to a better-paid job, if they rely on employers sponsoring a visa.
Do the reforms signal a change of political direction by Andy Burnham? The prime minister has already softened the government's position on immigration: he said on Sunday it was "difficult to say" if migration was now "too high or too low".
Mahmood also hinted she may support a change in direction, saying yesterday that the government had promised to get migration down “and we have”.
Burnham has appeared open to discussing the return of freedom of movement with the EU, although not until after the next general election.
Nigel Farage's anti-immigration Reform UK has slipped behind Labour and the Conservatives in the polls, having led for much of this parliament.
Even so, the combined vote of Reform and the far-right anti-immigration Restore UK still puts them close to Labour in the polls.
That suggests that, if Burnham believes the salience of immigration has waned for voters, he is taking something of a gamble.
INTERNATIONAL
Defence gaps
Drone and missile assault targets power plants and substations before winter
FABRICE DEPREZ — KYIV
A massive Russian drone and missile attack targeted Ukrainian energy infrastructure across the country overnight yesterday, as Moscow ratchets up its deadly air campaign ahead of winter.
More than a dozen energy facilities were hit across nine regions, according to Ukrainian authorities. The country's air force reported intercepting just three of the 17 Russian ballistic missiles fired by Moscow, highlighting Kyiv's acute shortage of air-defence interceptors. "Ukraine must be helped to defend its skies, otherwise Russia will never stop," President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said yesterday. The assault continued during the day and represents "one of the largest attacks on Ukraine's energy", state grid operator Ukrenergo said.
Ukraine's largest private energy company DTEK said three of its power plants were knocked offline by “dozens of missiles and drones”. Prime Minister Sergii Koretskyi said power plants and substations had been hit in nine regions.
Russia “is dangerously escalating its efforts to deny Ukrainians critical services like energy this winter”, DTEK executive Maxim Timchenko told the FT.
Moscow's intensifying campaign against Ukraine's energy infrastructure has already led to power outages in Kyiv, sometimes lasting more than 10 hours, and in several other regions.
"This year, the Russians have adopted a new tactic: they're striking not only power generation facilities but also carrying out strikes against the power grid, against energy distribution infrastructure," Zelenskyy said in a video address on Monday.
An attack on a village near the front-line in the Zaporizhzhia region also killed dozens of civilians on Monday. A first wave of gliding bombs pushed civilians to seek shelter within a closed school used as a humanitarian distribution point. Nine three-tonne gliding bombs levelled the building, with footage showing craters several metres deep and a few slabs of concrete where the building stood. The bombing took place as locals were gathering for distribution of humanitarian aid announced a day earlier on social media.
Officials said the strike killed at least 31 people, including two emergency workers, with 48 still unaccounted for. Deliberately targeting civilians is a war crime under international law.
"The timing and location of the humanitarian distribution were well publicised," Danielle Bell, head of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, said yesterday. "This attack seems to have violated the most fundamental principles of international humanitarian law."
The UN's monitoring mission in Ukraine said it had confirmed 328 civilian deaths in September, a sharp rise from the 249 people killed last year in the same period.
Bolstered by the mass production of a new generation of jet-powered drones and cheap cruise missiles, the Russian attacks have also expanded beyond energy to target Ukrainian logistics and business infrastructure.
Multiple drones also targeted the train station in the nearby city of Dnipro last week, killing 15 people when one of the drones hit a railway platform.



Drone and missile warnings test nerves in region after Warsaw raises alert level
RAPHAEL MINDER — LUBLIN
In Poland's eastern city of Lublin, popular with tourists for its medieval gates and pastel facades, residents are growing used to warning sirens and the roar of fighter jets scrambled in response to the threat of Russian drones or missiles.
Locals have been receiving text alerts about possible Russian air incursions since early September, while the city's airport suspended civilian flights six times that month to make room for the military to protect Poland's airspace.
Lublin's experience shows how five years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the war has started to intrude on everyday life in neighbouring Poland. Warsaw has raised the alert level in its eastern regions of Lublin and Subcarpathia after Moscow escalated its bombing of western Ukraine in recent months by using more jet-powered drones and missiles capable of reaching as far as Polish territory. A Russian helicopter also violated Polish airspace near the Russian military base of Kaliningrad in September.
"We had perhaps been thinking too long of this war as something that could happen only on the other side of our border," said Dariusz Krzysztofik, deputy director of the public safety department in Lublin, which is located $100\mathrm{km}$ from the Ukrainian border.
“Russia is now putting a lot of effort into getting us also to panic, although I’m confident that the Russians are actually increasing our resilience and making us more conscious that we really have to help Ukraine.”
In Wąwolnica, a village 35km further west of Lublin, mayor Marcin Łaguna said residents were becoming increasingly nervous about Russia, but also frustrated by “an information overload” of emergency text messages.
“We have no strategic assets worth destroying here, and in any case everybody knows that we don’t have the money to build a shelter to protect us against a big attack,” he said. “The problem is that when people keep getting warnings, they end up ignoring them.”
Ewa Lenartowicz, a resident of Wąwolnica, said she disregarded alerts sent to her phone, but could not sleep
Clockwise from left: Dariusz Krzysztofik, deputy director of the public safety department in Lublin, at the city's crisis management centre; text alerts from the Polish government; and the entrance to a designated underground shelter
Aleksandra Kossowska/FT

Baltic Sea
KALININGRAD (RUSSIA)
POLAND
Warsaw
Łuków
Wawalzie
SUBCARPATHIA — LUBLIN
100km SLOVAKIA
MapLibre ©Mapcreator ©OpenStreetMap through the sound of military aircraft overhead. “We grew up under communism, so my family has always kept food and other emergency reserves in the cellar . . . but it’s a new kind of stress to get woken up by fighter jets,” she said.
Poland has this year allocated almost 5 per cent of GDP to defence, making it proportionately Nato's biggest military spender. Warsaw has ordered aircraft, helicopters and tanks, but investment in civilian protection has lagged behind.
This year, Lublin opened its first fully sealed shelter, capable of housing about 200 people against chemical warfare and radioactive particles. The city plans to upgrade another 101 shelters within three years. “Until 2024, we had no [government] money for such investments,” Krzysztofik said. “We now have some money, but we still need the time.”
Lublin has enough underground car parks and other shelters to protect the population of the greater metropolitan area of more than 450,000 against a Russian drone attack. But only 38,000 residents could now find refuge in shelters designed to withstand a more powerful strike from a Russian Oreshnik ballistic missile, Krzysztofik said.
The city is also racing to expand its network of warning sirens, which can be heard by about 70 per cent of residents, to cover the whole of greater Lublin by year-end. “Everybody is still enjoying a normal life in Lublin, but I think there’s now a different atmosphere than in Warsaw,” said Krzysztofik.
In October, Lublin's authorities started putting green-and-orange signposts on buildings to mark evacuation routes and shelter locations. One recent meeting on emergency procedures attracted 250 people, compared with 10-20 residents attending such events before the summer, Krzysztofik said.
The Polish government is reinforcing its military presence around Lublin in response to Russia's airspace violations but also hybrid warfare attacks. Warsaw has attributed several acts of sabotage to Russia since last November, when
Poland narrowly avoided a train crash after an explosive device damaged Lublin's main railway to the capital.
Last month, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, defence minister, announced that Patriot air-defence batteries would be deployed around Lublin airport for the first time. A new helicopter base will also be established, alongside three extra military units, including a counter-drone brigade in nearby Łuków.
The reinforcements are intended in part to bring Lublin up to the level of Rzeszów in the south-east, whose airport has served as a hub for military and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine since Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion.
The army presence may reassure residents, but local officials worry militari- sation could undermine corporate investments in eastern Poland.
In Wąwolnica, the army is renovating a bridge to meet its transport standards. Mayor Łaguna welcomes this but is pessimistic about the economy. “Investors calculate whether a region is safe, so we have plenty of reasons to worry now also about losing out economically,” he said. “The risk of war with Russia is never going to be attractive.”
Financial support
AMY MACKINNON — WASHINGTON
JAMES SHOTTER — JERUSALEM
Donald Trump has said the US will stop providing military aid to Israel at the end of the year, saying the country “no longer needed it”, and describing it as a “bad talking point” as voters headed to the polls for midterm elections.
"Why should we suffer the slings from lunatics like an El-Sayed when [Israelis] don't need it?" the president said yesterday morning, referring to Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who has been a sharp critic of US support for Israel.
The US provides almost \$4bn in annual military assistance to Israel as part of a 10-year agreement that is set to expire in 2028. The funding has been a focus of intense debate due to Israel's devastating offensive in Gaza and has featured prominently in midterm campaigning.
It was not immediately clear whether the president can unilaterally halt the funding, which is appropriated by Congress. While Trump has broad authority to pause weapons transfers, any attempt to cancel funds allocated by lawmakers could face restrictions.
The move is also likely to face significant pushback from within Trump's Republican Party.
Support for military aid to Israel has fallen sharply among Democrats but a poll last month by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs found that 68 per cent of Republicans favour continuing or increasing military aid to the country.
Trump claimed yesterday that he had reached an agreement with Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, to cut off the aid.
"He brought it up. He said, 'I think it would be appropriate if we do not receive aid', because he understands that this is one of their points of contention," Trump said.
Netanyahu's office and the Israeli embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Netanyahu has recently warned that US aid to Israel could be scaled back, saying last month it was “only a matter of time” before Washington’s funding for Israel’s military was cut.
In a US television interview this year, he said he and Trump had discussed gradually weaning Israel off US military aid. But he said he had proposed scaling back the aid over the course of a decade, and has given no public indication that he had agreed for aid to cease as soon as this year.
US support has played a significant role in helping Israel finance the war in Gaza, which was triggered by Hamas's October 7 2023 attack, and has become Israel's longest and most expensive conflict, triggering a surge in military spending.
Under the terms of the agreement between the two countries, which was signed under the administration of Barack Obama, the US provides Israel with \$3.3bn in annual funding, which it can use to purchase US weapons.
The arrangement also includes \$500mn annually for joint projects such as the Iron Dome and David's Sling air-defence systems, which protect against drones and missiles.

Choose the Financial Times subscription for you
\- React to trusted global news everywhere you go, with ft.com and FT apps
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
Trilateral talks
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
MAX SEDDON — BERLIN
JOE LEAHY — BEIJING
US, Chinese and Russian officials are discussing a possible meeting between Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin this month when the leaders attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Chinese city of Shenzhen.
People familiar with the situation in Washington, Beijing and Moscow said officials had been holding serious talks about arranging the first trilateral meeting between the heads of state in two weeks' time.
“Work is under way on organising such a meeting,” Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s spokesperson, told the FT.
Later yesterday, Peskov told reporters there was a “general understanding among the participants of this possible meeting that it would be worthwhile and extremely useful”.
Asked about the prospects of a trilateral summit, China's foreign ministry said Beijing was "in communication with relevant parties regarding the meeting between the Chinese and Russian heads of state" but omitted any mention of Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump will travel to Shenzhen in two weeks to attend the Apec summit and hold his third meeting this year with Xi. Before his visit, he will fly to Manila to attend the annual meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Xi and Trump are expected to hold a fourth meeting next month when the Chinese leader visits Miami for the G20. Putin and Xi have met more than 40 times in total, according to Chinese state media, including at least three times this year.
It remains unclear if the three sides are talking together or if Beijing is instead holding bilateral talks with Washington and Moscow. People familiar with the situation warned that China, which would convene the meeting as the host of the Asia-Pacific economic forum, had not yet decided whether to proceed.
One person familiar with the talks said Washington and Moscow were pressing China to agree to a meeting. The Chinese foreign ministry last month said it had “no information to provide” about a possible trilateral summit.
Germany's President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Sunday said Xi seemed confused when he asked him about a possible trilateral summit when they met in China last week. He said Xi asked about the origin of the rumours.
One challenge to hosting a three-way meeting is setting an acceptable agenda for the leaders.
Steinmeier said Xi stated there were no plans for a trilateral meeting to discuss the war in Ukraine and that the Chinese leader added Europeans should be at the table given the war was a European conflict. David Shullman, vice-president at the Asia Society Policy

Possible talks: from left, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping
Institute, said the symbolism of Xi hosting a meeting between Washington, Beijing and Moscow officials would be “striking” even without a substantive agenda.
“Xi, whose support has been indispensable to Russia’s ability to sustain its war of aggression against Ukraine for the past four and a half years, would have an opportunity to present himself as the responsible, pivotal statesman bringing the US and Russia together in pursuit of stability,” said Shullman, who until recently led the US intelligence community’s strategic analysis on China.
"It would be a remarkable diplomatic coup," Shullman added.
A person familiar with Russia's thinking said that Moscow did not expect substantive talks on Ukraine during the mooted summit.
Russia thought China did not want to take a leading role in ending Putin's nearly five-year invasion, instead only taking credit once a peace settlement was in sight, the person said.
Trump has said he is open to holding a trilateral meeting in Shenzhen but has stressed the need to focus on nuclear arms control.

As nations rush to upgrade their digital defences, critical AI infrastructure is emerging as the new frontline. Rethink Defence at LombardOdier.com
rethink everything.
17 96
LOMBARD ODIER
LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH
PRIVATE BANKING ASSET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
Companies' debt levels remain low
INTERNATIONAL
While older savers are in line to benefit, younger people will find it difficult to buy homes and goods
Younger households have fewer assets and more housing debt, leaving them more exposed to interest rate rises


Households with two or more people. Assumes 1 percentage point increase in the policy rate, with fixed pass-through ratio from the policy rate to each interest rate
Sources: Oxford Economics; Ministry of Internal Affairs


Sources: Oxford Economics; Ministry of Finance • Data from 1985-2026
Property prices in central Tokyo, below, have risen at nearly double the national average Philip Fong/AFP/Getty Images
DAVID KEOHANE, HARRY DEMPSEY AND JANA TAUSCHINSKI — TOKYO
Japan may still have some of the lowest interest rates in the world, but the rapid increase expected by economists will have far-reaching implications for a population still coming to terms with the end of an era of deflation.
At 1.25 per cent, the Bank of Japan's main policy rate is already at its highest in 30 years. That is still well below annual inflation, but substantial rate increases could end the erosion of the value of bank savings, mostly held by older Japanese, while making it harder for younger people to buy homes and consumer goods.
The rapid increase in interest rates is shaping up to be a “war between generations”, as much as between rich and poor, said Shigeto Nagai, chief Japan economist at Oxford Economics.
“For households overall, interest rate increases are going to be positive because of the massive deposits they hold,” said Sota Takano, senior economist at Itochu Research Institute. “But if you are aged 30 to 40, and you want to get a mortgage but have not built up the kind of assets older people have, then you are going to be hit the hardest.”
Goki Masui, a 46-year-old legal professional, certainly feels like a winner. He bought a home in Greater Tokyo, where property prices have risen much more than in many areas of Japan, and is untroubled by the prospect of higher borrowing costs.
"I own a home and its value has skyrocketed since 2011. Looking at my balance sheet, I feel there's no problem at all," Masui said. "But for young people, interest rates are going up, money is hard to borrow and house prices themselves are high, so they can't buy them."
For Yuto Horiguchi, 30, the very idea of taking out a housing loan is laughable. "I don't have that sort of luxury," he said. "I need my wages to go up."
While Japanese wages are at last rising faster than inflation, Horiguchi is one of many people of his age in Tokyo who have not seen their incomes keep up with property prices.
Nationwide, residential property prices rose 4.4 per cent in 2025, broadly in line with wage growth among younger workers, according to Takano at Itochu. But in central Tokyo, property prices jumped 8.3 per cent.
"The main challenge for younger homebuyers until now has been the sharp rise in property prices," Takano said. "From here, rising mortgage rates are likely to make home ownership increasingly difficult as well."
The vast majority of Japanese take out variable-rate mortgages due to the recent history of rock-bottom rates. Roughly 75 per cent of new mortgages in Japan are variable, a far higher proportion than in the euro area, US or UK.
Even as rates look set to rise, many borrowers are unwilling to abandon variable-rate mortgages. According to Mogecheck, a mortgage broker in Tokyo, such mortgages currently carry average interest rates of about 1.3 to 1.6 per cent compared with 3.8 per cent for 35-year fixed-rate loans. Japan's headline consumer price annual inflation rate was 2.1 per cent in September.
A 28-year-old finance sector worker who declined to be named said he took out a 35-year, ¥47mn (\$300,000) housing loan in September at a variable rate of 1 per cent. His monthly payments of ¥110,000 would have risen significantly at the 3 per cent rate offered under a fixed-rate mortgage.
"I wanted to take advantage of those low borrowing costs and build up my assets," he said. "Stock prices have been rising recently so I'm hoping that the assets I have invested there will grow."
Some borrowers are also pushing out the length of mortgages, even taking out 50-year loans.
A Cabinet Office simulation found a one percentage point increase in mortgage rates would leave holders in their thirties with an average additional annual interest burden of about ¥240,000, equivalent to roughly 4 per cent of disposable income.

Under repayment terms offered by many lenders, monthly payments stay unchanged for five years even if interest rates rise. But since borrowers repay less principal per month, that pushes any problems further down the road.
Takashi Shiozawa, an executive with Mogecheck, said that while inflation-adjusted mortgage rates remained negative, the BoJ was narrowing that gap. He warned that banks had begun tightening lending standards for 50-year mortgages in recent months. “People are increasingly wondering whether they should buy now because they’re worried that, as mortgage rates rise, property prices could fall,” Shiozawa said.
Japan remains a low-leverage economy, but higher rates will still affect consumer borrowing from car purchases to luxury goods.
According to the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, cash remains the most common way to buy a car, with conventional loans and automakers' financing each used by about 15 per cent of buyers.
'People are wondering whether they should buy now because they're worried that, as mortgage rates rise, property prices could fall'
Carmaker Nissan said rising funding costs had forced lenders to increase rates after years of keeping them steady. Dealers were finding financing discussions increasingly difficult as cars became more expensive, it said.
The squeeze is also emerging in other areas of consumer spending. Second-hand luxury goods retailer Allu said in August it was cutting the number of interest-free instalments available on some shopping loans from 60 to 24 because of rising rates, shortening the period over which customers could spread the cost of purchases.
Takahiro Yamaguchi wants to expand his rice farm in Ibaraki Prefecture north-east of Tokyo by 50 per cent, the kind of shift to larger-scale agriculture that would help Japan address its low self-sufficiency in food as its workforce contracts. But a slump in rice prices and rising interest rates on loans to buy autonomous tractors and other machinery make Yamaguchi cautious. A loan for a warehouse is becoming a burden.
“We’d like to push ahead as fast as we can but there is a possibility we could be stopped in our tracks,” he said. “Taking today’s interest rates into account, we might end up delaying it a year.”
Small businesses are among Japan's more vulnerable companies as interest rates rise. Oxford Economics estimates a one percentage point increase in borrowing rates could push the proportion of lossmaking small businesses from 27 per cent to 31 per cent.
Economists said lower profits could have knock-on negative effects on capital spending, and therefore small enterprises' competitiveness and ability to raise wages for the 70 per cent of the Japanese workforce they employ.
Masaki Nakano at the Research Institute of Japan Finance Corporation, a government-owned lender, said strong demand for semiconductors and AI was outweighing the tightening effect of higher interest rates. But further increases could lead to a “widening of the gaps” between stronger and weaker companies, he said.
Masayuki Fujino, who runs Fuji Seiki, a precision manufacturer in Tokyo, said higher rates were “like the damage from a series of jabs in boxing, gradually having more and more of an effect”.
A more vibrant economy liberated from deflation could eventually outweigh any short-term pain from higher rates for younger Japanese, who are already saving and investing more. Households headed by someone under 30 have the fastest growth in financial assets of any age group – jumping 62 per cent between 2019 and 2024 to an average of ¥3.2mn, government data shows.
But they remain substantially poorer than households headed by someone in their sixties, which hold an average of ¥23.4mn in financial assets.
Takeo Kondo, 77-year-old owner of a signage business, is one of the many elderly Japanese who would benefit from better returns on their savings.
"There aren't really any downsides for me," he said.
With returns on even five-year bank deposits still well below inflation, the finance ministry says some older retail investors have been moving money into higher-yielding government bonds and the rising stock market.
Across Japanese households, the proportion of financial assets held in cash and deposits fell five percentage points in the year to June 2026, while the share held in securities rose six points, according to the Japan Research Institute.
US veteran
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
GEORGE HAMMOND — SAN FRANCISCO
OpenAI has hired Dan Driscoll, the former US Army secretary who resigned following tensions with defence secretary Pete Hegseth, as the military seeks to expand its use of AI to enhance national and cyber security.
The Iraq war veteran and close friend of vice-president JD Vance will join the group in a newly created role as senior counsellor for national security modernisation, OpenAI told the FT.
The San Francisco-based group added that Driscoll would focus on working with American allies to advance the responsible use of AI.
“Dan will work with OpenAI teams and leaders across governments, industry, academia and allied institutions to advance practical modernisation initiatives to advance the build-out of democratic AI,” the company said. It added that Driscoll would help its teams “understand the operational needs of global national security institutions”.
At the Pentagon, Driscoll drove reform efforts aimed at introducing new technology more quickly and making weapons more interoperable. Earlier this year, he organised a hackathon called Operation Jailbreak to improve communications between weapons using lessons learnt in Ukraine.
The 40-year-old former defence official who clashed with Hegseth over the Pentagon chief's firing of several widely respected army officers has been tipped to play a senior role in any potential Vance 2028 presidential campaign.
“National security requirements are changing faster than at any time in the past 50 years,” Driscoll said. “I’m joining OpenAI to help the US and our allies put this technology to work responsibly, for the people who keep us safe.”
OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the US had an opportunity to work with countries to spread the adoption of democratic AI and that Driscoll would “strengthen American leadership and help us do that”. OpenAI said Driscoll would advise public and private sector partners on modernising policy and ways to “unlock practical uses of AI to improve national security and . . . support democratic principles”.
OpenAI has provided cyber defence in several European countries, including France, Germany and Poland, with access to its models. It has also allowed the Ukrainian government to access a programme called Daybreak designed to help identify software vulnerabilities.
The tools being developed by OpenAI and its rivals are regarded as critical to US national security, both as a form of defence and as a potential vulnerability.
Earlier this year, OpenAI expanded its relationship with the Pentagon, agreeing to deploy its AI models in classified settings following the collapse of talks between rival Anthropic and Hegseth.
OpenAI was widely expected to go public this year, having confidentially filed its initial public offering prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission in June. But it has deferred its listing until next year and is instead seeking to raise \$20bn in a private funding round this month.
Adam Tooze see Opinion
Theft accusations
MARTON DUNAI — BUDAPEST
Serbian authorities have detained the owner of Alta Bank and accused him of emptying the deposit vault after Aleksandar Vučić's recent election loss.
Davor Macura and two other bank officials were arrested following searches at the bank's premises and Macura's home, Serbian police said yesterday. Macura is suspected of illegally removing more than €380mn worth of cash from the bank's vault, they added.
The National Bank of Serbia on Saturday revoked Alta Bank's operating licence, saying it had come under a financial and liquidity strain after its clients, many of Russian nationality, made large withdrawals and millions of euros left the country last week.
Alta Bank and Macura were among the first targets of an anti-corruption drive following the fall of Vučić, whose authoritarian 12-year rule ended when a student-led movement defeated his SNS party in October 25 elections. Vučić had called the snap vote after resigning as president, hoping to retain power.
Macura's alleged accomplices, the director of Alta's treasury and cash management department and a treasury operations associate, “handed [Macura] their access cards to the vault or enabled him to enter the ‘Depo’ vault without authorisation by using their own cards and accompanying him”, the prosecutors said. “During these unauthorised entries, [Macura] allegedly removed money from the vault, thereby obtaining an unlawful financial benefit of approximately 45bn dinars.”
Alta's parent company has faced scrutiny from the European Central Bank over suspected money laundering as part of an attempt to acquire an Austrian lender, Addiko, with the ECB questioning whether the bank could verify the legitimate origin of deposits. Alta had said the ECB found no wrongdoing.
Ljiljana Borovic, a Belgrade criminal defence lawyer, said that Alta had grown from a small money exchange office on the outskirts of Belgrade into a systemic bank after it acquired a Serbian state-owned lender and took on government business.
The bank was also the only one that catered to Russian businesses and individuals alike, growing its balance sheet after the arrival of tens of thousands of Russians following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
"The bank's rapid growth, the enormous increase in the number of its branches and offices, and the expansion of its operations into other business sectors and neighbouring countries within an exceptionally short period of time raised legitimate concerns among financial and banking experts," Borovic said.
The National Bank of Serbia and Vučić's SNS party did not respond to requests for comment. Macura has denied wrongdoing, telling the FT before his arrest that his bank was a target of “a sustained campaign of hostile briefing, leaks and insinuation”.
Austrian lender Raiffeisen Bank International, which had been selected to take over Addiko and sell some Addiko assets to Alta in a carve-out, said it “expects to remain owner of all of Addiko’s subsidiaries, including the one in Serbia” as it no longer expected Alta “to get regulatory approval”.
Central bank
OLAF STORBECK — FRANKFURT
PAOLA TAMMA — BERLIN
Brussels has given Eurozone governments just days to nominate candidates to be the next president of the European Central Bank, signalling that the race to find Christine Lagarde's successor could come to a head quickly.
Kyriakos Pierrakakis, president of the Eurogroup and Greek finance minister, called on the bloc's 21 member states to submit their nominations by Friday, a spokesperson for the body co-ordinating Eurozone policy said yesterday.
Lagarde announced last week that she will step down as ECB president on February 7, nine months before the end of her eight-year term.
The change in leadership at Europe's most powerful monetary authority comes as the region is in the throes of another wave of inflation and growing investor concern over the state of France's public finances and political stability in the run-up to its presidential elections in April.
Lagarde said last week that she wanted “greater freedom to express her views” on matters other than monetary policy. She has also been in talks with the World Economic Forum over becoming its next chair.
The ECB president and the five other members of its executive board are appointed by the leaders of the 21 countries that use the euro, after consulting with the European parliament and the ECB. A successful candidate needs the support of at least 16 countries representing 65 per cent of the euro area's population.
EU leaders, who will meet twice this month and again in December, are expected to make a decision before the end of the year on both Lagarde's replacement and two other seats on the executive board that will also become vacant in 2027.

Departing head: Christine Lagarde will step down on February 7
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel will leave to join the IMF in January, while the central bank's chief economist Philip Lane's eight-year term will expire in late May.
Pablo Hernández de Cos, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, and Klaas Knot, the former Dutch central bank governor, are seen as frontrunners to become the fifth ECB president from February.
Hernández de Cos is viewed as a more dovish economist while Knot has a hawkish reputation. However, people familiar with their views stress that both are pragmatists who are keen to forge consensus among policymakers and are not wedded to ideological positions.
After Germany last month signalled that it would not seek the ECB presidency, the odds on a surprise outside candidate to replace Lagarde widened.
But observers warn that new names could still emerge at the eleventh hour. According to people familiar with discussions in various capitals, France is eyeing the ECB chief economist role, seen as the second most important.

Inspiration is the power to look forward, to shape the unseen, turning the present into something iconic.
/ TOMORROW'S TIMELESS
SANLORENZO

INTERNATIONAL
Central bank
RBA's fifth increase this year comes as inflation remains above target
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Australia's central bank has raised interest rates to an 18-year high as it warned inflation remained above target in an economy grappling with high unemployment and a collapse in house prices.
The Reserve Bank of Australia yesterday opted to raise interest rates by 0.25 percentage points to 4.85 per cent, its fifth increase this year, as it said the inflation outlook was now “materially higher”, with fuel, commodities and AIrelated investments driving up prices. The bank said it did not expect inflation to drop into its target range of 2 to 3 per cent – which it has been above for two years – until late next year, three quarters later than previously forecast.
Official data released last week showed underlying inflation – which strips out volatile items such as fuel – hit 3.6 per cent in the year to September, a slight rise on the month before, while overall inflation was up 4.3 per cent.
RBA governor Michele Bullock told reporters the central bank's fifth rate rise in 2026 reflected a worsening inflation outlook. “I know this is not the news many Australians wanted to hear but it is what is needed,” she said.
Bullock added that high inflation affected everyone, not just mortgage holders. "This is the right thing for the Australian economy," she said.
The Australian dollar weakened as much as 0.35 per cent to under US\$0.70 following the announcement of the rise, which was widely expected, and was decided in a 6-3 vote.
The latest rate move, which arrived shortly before the start of the Melbourne Cup horse race, one of Australia's biggest annual sporting events, added to growing concerns about the health of the economy with house prices slumping and unemployment rising to 4.7 per cent last month.
It will also heap pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government, which has signalled that it is preparing to cut public spending next month. The government has repeatedly pointed to external factors, including the war in the Middle East, as key factors driving inflation. Paul Bloxham, chief economist at HSBC Australia, said there was “a risk the Australian economy tips into recession”, adding: “We put the risk at a 50-50 chance.”
Bullock said the central bank's baseline forecast did not foresee a recession but warned that, with house prices tumbling and unemployment rising, many Australians may perceive one had arrived. "I think that is going to make people feel like it's a recession because they feel poorer," she said.
Shane Oliver, chief economist at AMP, said the cumulative rate rises would increase annual mortgage interest payments for many homeowners by A\$6,600 (US\$4,610) a year. “We may be close to a tipping point for some mortgage holders,” he said in a note.
The rate move also put the RBA out of step with other central banks, such as the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, which opted to hold rates at recent meetings.
Bullock said the bank's aggressive strategy was needed to reduce excess demand in the Australian economy. She added the disparity between the RBA's inflation targets and monthly readings was broadly similar across different markets. "I wouldn't say we're completely Robinson Crusoe here," she said.


Sources: Cotality; FT calculations • \* Data for Brisbane includes Gold Coast. Data as of Oct 29 2026
Australia has experienced several house price corrections since 1980

Measures aimed at cooling demand risk tipping economy into recession, say economists
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Australia's attempt to fix its housing crisis in May included a tacit understanding that the measures would lead to a lowering in prices in one of the world's most expensive property markets as investors left the market.
Nearly six months since the authorities unwound incentives that had fostered a housing boom and against a backdrop of higher inflation and rising interest rates, the impact has been more severe than expected.
The country is facing its worst housing correction in 40 years, which some economists fear might turn into an economic crisis. “Since 1982 there have been nine price corrections in the Australian market but this current one is potentially the mother of them all,” said Barrie Harrop, a property developer since the 1970s.
House prices have fallen 5.2 per cent since March, when the government of Anthony Albanese ended tax breaks and a capital gains discount that benefited people who owned multiple homes, according to Cotality, a property research company.
Analysts predicted that prices would drop by between 5 and 10 per cent as houses lost their appeal as the main source of investment for many well-off Australians.
But some economists now project a peak-to-trough decline of up to 15 per cent by the end of next year.
The Reserve Bank of Australia yesterday raised interest rates for a fifth time this year after inflation hit 4.3 per cent in the year to September, up from 4 per cent in the year to August, well above its target range.
Shane Oliver, chief economist and head of investment strategy at AMP, said the rate rise would probably push the property price decline towards the 15 per cent level heading into next year and could increase the number of distressed sellers.
"Prices are being hit by a perfect storm of rate hikes, tax hikes on investors, poor confidence and poor affordability depressing demand," he said.
That is evident in the weekly auctions held across the country. Data from
The median value of houses in Sydney plunged by more than A\$82,000 in the three months to September
Brendon Thorne/Bloomberg
Cotality suggests that more homes are being put up for auction as the weather has become warmer but also that the number of listings was 40 per cent below the levels of last year.
Meanwhile, agreed sales have fallen below 50 per cent in three of the past four weeks across Australian cities.
Domain, a property listings company, said the steepest quarterly decline in house prices since the early 1990s was recorded in the three months to September.
The median value of houses in Sydney plunged by more than A\$82,000 (\$57,800) in that period.
Atypically, the house price decline hit capital cities in all states, ranging from A\$20,000 over the quarter in Darwin to almost A\$90,000 in Perth.
Morgan Stanley said Australia's housing market would suffer its biggest correction since 1982 if prices dropped by 12.5 per cent. That would rank alongside housing busts during the depressions of the 1890s and 1930s.
The bank also cut its forecast for GDP growth next year to 1.1 per cent from 1.4 per cent and predicted that unemployment would rise to 5.1 per cent from 4.7 per cent.
Stephen Koukoulas, managing director of Market Economics and a former adviser to the Labor government of Julia Gillard, said that lower house prices were “desirable” to improve affordability but warned of risks.
“Falling house prices are a big deal. I am as nervous as a cat in a room full of rocking chairs,” he said. “The government does not want a recession but each week it is getting closer.”
On the deteriorating economic conditions, he added: "People will be pissed off and they will blame someone."
Jim Chalmers, Australia's treasurer, has blamed rising interest rates for the slump and argued that buying a house is a long-term investment with modest price rises expected in the coming years.
He has, however, admitted that the government has “lost some political paint” and has started to signal potential public spending cuts ahead of a mid-year budget due next month.
Since the measures were introduced, Chalmers' net public approval rating has fallen by nine percentage points to
'Falling house prices are a big deal. Each week a recession is getting closer'
Stephen Koukoulas, Market Economics
minus 23 points in a recent poll by the Australian Financial Review.
The opposition Liberal Party has warned that many first-time buyers who took out loans to buy houses ahead of the tax changes are at risk of negative equity. Shadow treasurer Tim Wilson blamed Labor for the worsening economic outlook and, after last week's inflation figures, said that “Australians can barely to afford to keep their homes”.
Even trophy houses are not immune. Rothesay, a Gothic mansion dating to 1868, was sold last month for A\$12.8mn (\$9mn) only four years after its previous owner paid nearly A\$20mn, a then-record for the area.
The price slump also has implications for the construction industry. Harrop, the property developer, warned that tens of thousands of planned developments were no longer viable.
Harrop has fielded calls from developers looking to sell projects at a steep discount in recent weeks but said that the malaise could persist for at least another two years. "To say it is chaotic is an understatement," he said.
Wealthy expats
AMY KAZMIN — ROME
JAMIE JOHN AND JOSH SPERO — LONDON
Giorgia Meloni's plan to impose an "exit tax" on wealthy people who leave Italy risks driving away expatriates drawn to cities such as Milan over the past decade, experts have warned.
In its draft budget, the prime minister's coalition proposed a 26 per cent tax on paper profits accrued by people with assets of €800,000 or more who decide to leave Italy.
Private wealth lawyers warned that the move, if approved by parliament, would reduce Italy's attractiveness to the super-rich and discourage those already resident from remaining.
"It is a really significant move, and one that is going to have a lot of clients who have relocated there, or based there generally, very nervous," said Charlie Sosna, head of private wealth and tax at law firm Mishcon de Reya.
The exit tax, which Meloni's government said was aimed at the “super-rich”, would apply to people who were tax residents in Italy for six of the 10 years before their departure. It could be refunded if financial assets were not liquidated for some years after they left.
Over the past decade, Italy has tried to tackle the problem of departing wealth with tax incentives to encourage affluent professionals to stay and rich expatriates to settle there. Under its “flat tax” regime, expatriates moving to Italy pay a single annual levy on their total overseas assets and income for 15 years.
When the scheme began in 2017, the fee was fixed at €100,000 a year.
Rome has also offered tax breaks to newly arrived working professionals, including returning Italians, who pay income tax on just a portion of their salaries for five years. But in the past two years, amid an outcry over super-rich expats in Milan, Meloni's coalition has twice raised the flat tax, which is now levied at €300,000 a year.
“Clients were [already] anxious about a relocation to Italy as they saw it as unpredictable,” said Sosna. But with changes to the flat tax “and now the mention of an exit tax”, they are going to be “really considering their options”.
Rome will raise €3.7mn from the exit tax next year, rising to just over €6.7mn for the next four years, and then falling again to €3.4mn a year from 2032, as those who left can start to claim refunds.
Maurizio Fresca, a senior tax lawyer at Rome-based law firm Chiomenti, said many aspects of the proposal were ambiguous, including how it would relate to the flat tax and other incentive schemes – and whether it would apply only to assets held in Italy or worldwide.
Tim Stovold, head of tax at Moore Kingston Smith, said the proposal might encourage people to leave Italy before hitting the six-year residency threshold that would trigger a potential exit levy.
"It is going to make Italy a much less popular destination for individuals to make their long-term home," he said.
Italy's finance ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
Many other countries impose an exit tax on rich individuals who relocate. In the US, those with a net worth above \$2mn who give up their green cards or citizenship pay capital gains tax on the paper gains of assets across the world. See Lex
Peacekeepers
HEBA SALEH — CAIRO
UN peacekeepers are wrapping up a 35-year mission in Western Sahara after the Security Council failed to renew their mandate, in a development that analysts warned could lead to open conflict between Morocco and Algeria.
The mission's mandate expired on Sunday after the Security Council hit a deadlock on Friday when both the US and Russia presented competing resolutions, neither of which was adopted.
Russia vetoed a US proposal that would have ended any possibility of the UN mission organising a long-stalled referendum on Western Sahara's self-determination, in effect handing sovereignty to Morocco, which already controls much of the territory. Russia's resolution to extend the mission's mandate by a year failed to get enough votes.
While Morocco claims sovereignty over Western Sahara, Algeria hosts and backs the Polisario Front, a group fighting for independence for the territory.
“We are now in uncharted territory,” said Riccardo Fabiani, north Africa director at the International Crisis Group, who said the withdrawal of peacekeepers from a buffer zone meant a miscalculation by either side could more easily ignite a broader conflict.
Morocco and Algeria, which broke off ties in 2021, are arch-foes. Both have been building their militaries, with Algeria ranked Africa's biggest military spender and Morocco acquiring equipment from the US, Israel and France.
A spokesperson for UN secretary-general António Guterres said on Sunday that the peacekeepers' departure did not abrogate the local Sahrawi population's right to self-determination and Guterres was concerned about "the risk of escalation of hostilities".
Oubi Bouchraya Bachir, an adviser to Polisario leader Brahim Ghali, said the Front would “show self-restraint in the field” to allow for a political solution. Morocco’s King Mohammed VI said his country would abide by a ceasefire.
Football
AHMED AL OMRAN — JEDDAH
The Asian Cup football tournament that was due to be held in Saudi Arabia early next year has been postponed, as the Middle East braces itself for a renewed round of escalation in the Israel and US-Iran war.
The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) confirmed yesterday that the event would be delayed until December 2027, marking the latest event to be cancelled or rescheduled after a series of attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels targeting Riyadh airport and other civilian and energy infrastructure sites in Saudi Arabia.
The country's flagship “Davos in the desert” investment conference that was scheduled to take place in the capital last month was moved to next year after an attack on King Khalid International airport killed at least 12 people and wounded more than 300.
Formula 1 originally postponed its Saudi race from April to November after the start of the US-Israel strikes on Iran, but officials later said the kingdom's race would no longer take place.
The AFC and local organising committee said the decision to postpone the Asian Cup was “in light of the current exceptional circumstances arising from developments in the region, including substantial logistical complexities and travel disruptions”.
The organisers added: “Exceptional circumstances have been created for the organisation and delivery of the competition as originally scheduled, making the postponement necessary in the interest of all participating teams, officials, spectators and other stakeholders.”
Even before the Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia over the summer, a combination of security concerns and budgetary constraints had already forced the cancellation of several events in the kingdom, including the Red Sea International Film Festival and electronic music festival MDLBeast.
Security
PETER CAMPBELL, BARNEY JOPSON, RAPHAEL MINDER AND LAURA DUBOIS
Seven passenger aircraft across Europe were grounded and searched yesterday after a series of bomb threats received within hours of each other.
The authorities said the incidents were found to be hoaxes, but analysts warned airlines should brace for more threats in the coming days as part of what could be a co-ordinated attempt to disrupt aviation across the region.
A Ryanair flight from Manchester received a bomb threat while en route to Murcia in Spain and was quickly evacuated and swept for explosives on landing, while a flight by Polish airline LOT from Heathrow was diverted and forced to land at Warsaw's Modlin Airport for searches. The Warsaw airport was briefly closed but has since reopened.
Also yesterday, an SAS flight from Copenhagen to Warsaw's Chopin Airport, a Wizz Air flight from Bergamo to Sofia, another flight to Sofia from
Dublin and two Ryanair services landing at Rome Fiumicino were searched after separate threats were received. One of the Ryanair flights was escorted by Italian fighter jets while landing.
The incidents, which have not been officially linked, come the day after a Wizz Air flight from Luton was forced to land in Budapest after receiving a bomb threat. Two weeks ago, an Austrian Airlines flight from Israel was also forced to land at Sofia after receiving a threat that turned out to be false.
So far, none of the authorities that searched the planes reported finding any evidence of devices or explosives.
Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, a transport spokesperson for the European Commission, said: "It is too early to draw conclusions on whether the reported incidents are linked. National investigations remain ongoing."
Osprey, an aviation security group, told clients yesterday: "There is a realistic possibility of further bomb threats targeting aviation in the near term."
Big chill Officials assess dangers to Europe's food security after latest wave of cyber attacks on supermarket freezers ➕ PAGE 11
\- Engineer duped into malware attack
NIKOU ASGARI — LONDON
JILL R SHAH — NEW YORK
Binance said the attackers who stole \$6.3bn from the crypto exchange last week set up fake job interviews to trick a software engineer at the company into installing malicious code, as it laid out findings from a probe into the heist.
"It was not a single isolated breach or a simple phishing incident. The attackers combined a range of techniques, including . . . fake recruitment interviews, malicious software downloads" and other methods, Binance said yesterday.
The FBI has blamed TraderTraitor, a group of hackers linked to North Korea, for the biggest heist on record. The attack came as advances in artificial
intelligence have driven an increase in such hacks in crypto, revealing vulnerabilities in blockchain technology.
Binance's findings also underscore the significant role of human error in allowing the hackers to gain access to the exchange's systems.
The company said that in June one of its engineers had downloaded a tampered software program. This was detected by Binance's systems and the engineer's device was replaced, but not before the engineer's "role and his related colleagues on our wallet infrastructure team [had been] exposed to the hacker", it said.
In September, a second Binance engineer was contacted through a job-hunting platform by a person claiming to be a project director at what turned out to be a fake company. The engineer took part in what they thought was a job interview, during which the interviewer shared their social media profile “in order to build trust”, Binance said. It said the episode was “more advanced and deceptive than previously seen social engineering approaches”.
At a second interview with a person claiming to be the CEO of the fake company, which took place over a social chat app, the interviewer instructed the engineer to download an interview assignment, which contained malicious code. This download went undetected and allowed the attackers to use Binance's internal AI tools to gain control over some of the exchange's systems.
"The malware employed sophisticated obfuscation and evasion techniques, including replacing a legitimate development tool component with a malicious version to execute commands and establish communication with an attacker-controlled external server," Binance said.
With the malware in place, attackers used the engineer's compromised laptop and a Binance AI tool to control the laptops of the first and a third engineer. The first engineer had the ability to publish code, which the hackers used to their advantage.
On October 29, the day of the hack, the attackers logged on to the third engineer's laptop and "triggered a malicious script to launch the attack". Binance said it had since rebuilt its wallet systems and AI tools, and was working with external cyber security experts to strengthen its security systems.
Binance co-chief executive Yi He said that this year the company had detected and neutralised 57 suspected North Korean cyber threats. "We intercepted many of them, but the cost of failing to stop even one was severe – and this should never have happened," she said. Laundering process page 13
Deal cleared Chinese retailer JD.com to buy Ceconomy after state subsidy ruling by EU

A MediaMarkt store in Germany. The retail chain is one of two brands operated by Ceconomy — Imke Lass/Bloomberg
ANDY BOUNDS — BRUSSELS
FLORIAN MÜLLER — FRANKFURT
JD.com's €2.2bn acquisition of German electronics retailer Ceconomy has been cleared by the European Commission following an investigation in which Brussels determined the Chinese ecommerce group had benefited from state subsidies.
The Commission said yesterday that JD.com had made commitments “which fully and effectively remedy the distortion resulting from the identified foreign subsidies”.
The deal is the first time a Chinese takeover of a European company has been assessed using the EU's foreign subsidy regulation, at a time of trade tensions between the two sides. China had threatened retaliation if the deal was blocked. It comes weeks after Brussels and Beijing agreed to limit Chinese hybrid vehicle exports to the EU to tackle a widening trade deficit.
JD.com, China's largest retailer with annual revenue of \$187.2bn last year, launched its bid for Ceconomy, which operates more than 1,000 stores across Europe under the MediaMarkt and Saturn brands, in July last year.
The Commission said yesterday that JD.com had used preferential financing, tax incentives and grants from Beijing to develop logistics and technological knowhow that would allow Ceconomy to undercut its competitors.
JD.com has pledged to provide technology and logistics, including warehousing, to other retailers on the same terms as Ceconomy. It has also committed to conducting intragroup transactions, including financing, on market terms. The commitments last for 10 years.
EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said this would prevent “cross-subsidisation of the parties’ European operations”. She added: “Consumers benefit from a competitive retail and ecommerce sector, with a level playing field for companies."
The closure of the deal comes about five months behind the companies' target completion date and a week before a hard "long-stop date", after which either party had the right to walk away if all regulatory clearances had not been obtained. Ceconomy shares rose 2.7 per cent yesterday.
JD.com chief Sandy Xu said: "Our goal is to support Ceconomy in accelerating its growth sustainably, further strengthening its competitive position in Europe and continuously driving innovation in an evolving retail market."
Remko Rijnders, chief executive of Ceconomy, said: “Customers will benefit from a wider selection, including faster deliveries, as well as access to exciting new technologies that will help bring innovations to market more quickly.”
LEE HARRIS — LONDON
ANTOINE GARA — NEW YORK
Mark Walter has explored a sale of \$71bn-in-assets insurer Delaware Life following a federal probe into the billionaire financier's investment empire.
Walter has weighed selling the insurer in a deal that could form part of a broader restructuring of his holding company TWG Global, according to three people familiar with the matter. The planning was at an early stage and might not result in a deal, the people said.
“TWG is not running a sales process for Delaware Life, nor has TWG retained external advisers, legal or financial, to advance a sale,” the company said in a statement.
“TWG has also not approached bidders about a possible sale. We remain focused on TWG’s commitment to the affiliated investments reduction plan, and we are pleased that the plan continues to progress.”
Delaware Life did not respond to a request for comment.
A sale would be the latest in a series of disposals by the chief executive of investment firm Guggenheim Partners. Walter has rushed to raise cash since a probe by US prosecutors revealed \$16bn in misclassified private investments at Delaware Life and billions more at another insurer he controlled.
Walter has struck deals in recent months to sell his stakes in the Los Angeles Lakers basketball team and London's Chelsea Football Club. His TWG Global stated that the Lakers sale was not part of a “fire sale” and had denied wrongdoing.
Delaware Life had \$71bn in assets under management as of June, according to the company, and more than 380,000 active annuity and life insurance policies.
"He may be forced to sell it at some point, so he's trying to get ahead of it," one of the people said of plans to sell down TWG's controlling stake in Delaware Life.
Walter has faced growing pressure on his businesses since Delaware Life and Clear Spring Life and Annuity, both of which he controls through TWG, revealed in June that they had received subpoenas in connection with an investigation by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
TWG said in August that Walter's insurers planned to "promptly eliminate all of the affiliate exposure".
BUSINESS INSIGHT
EUROPE
John
Gapper

ocation matters in logistics, as the view from halfway up one of the 16 tall cranes at London Gateway shows. The Thames flows by on one side, a huge
Tesco distribution centre rises in the distance, and a fifth cargo ship berth is being built. This will soon become the UK's largest container port.
Most ports are historic but London Gateway is new. Perched on the north bank of the Thames Estuary 25 miles east of the capital where a Shell oil refinery used to be, it started construction in 2010. It expects to overtake Felixstowe in Suffolk by 2028 as it draws the biggest ships from China and Asia, loaded with steel boxes.
Dubai Ports World has invested £3bn since inheriting the project as part of its £3.9bn takeover of the ports and ferries group P&O 20 years ago. The scale of the Emirati group's ambition is obvious as one turns off the A13 and drives past the Essex town of Stanford-le-Hope. Pot-holed roads recede and 1,500 acres of development appear.
The Abidjan, owned by the world's largest container shipping group MSC, was being unloaded when I visited last week, before it sailed on to Rotterdam. Its containers were lifted by Chinese 138-metre-high cranes before being moved on electric shuttles to automated stacking cranes. The cranes hoisted the steel boxes again, placing them on the rear of waiting trucks.
London Gateway was a big bet on the adage if you build it, they will come. In this case, DP World had to persuade container carriers plying global routes from Asia to Europe to put in there, rather than Felixstowe or Southampton. Although the nearby port of Tilbury handles some containers, it is not deep enough for the world's largest ships.
DP World, which operates a container terminal at Southampton, also had to reverse the 60-year tide away from London. Inner London's docks and wharves declined in the 1960s amid the move from dry-bulk cargo to containers. Felixstowe became the main gateway port into the UK, despite being 90 miles from the capital.
But the decision to build a modern, deep-water port on
deep-water port on an expanse of brownfield Thames-side land is working. London Gateway pulled closer to Felix-stowe last year when Gemini, a
The port expects to overtake Felixstowe as it draws the biggest ships from China and Asia, loaded with steel boxes
global shipping alliance of Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, moved its Asia to Europe traffic there. After the fifth berth opens next year and a sixth by 2030, it will employ 1,600 people.
“Felixstowe has been the UK’s primary port for decades but it is slowly losing its crown,” says Eirik Hooper of the maritime consultancy Drewry. Felixstowe is owned by CK Hutchison, the Hong Kong-based conglomerate, and Southampton by Associated British Ports, the UK’s largest operator. The Australian group IFM Investors took a majority stake in ABP last month, valuing it at £10bn.
London Gateway has been helped by a surge in imports as Chinese-made electric vehicles take a larger share of the UK market. Cars usually travel on roll-on/roll-off ferries but demand is now so high that they are being packed in containers. The number of deep-sea containers handled by UK ports last year rose by 12 per cent, with most of the increase in London.
The port's allure is a matter of logistics as well as location. There is an adjacent logistics park for companies such as Tesco and UPS to bring goods straight into their facilities. Modelled on the Jebel Ali free zone in Dubai, it is a barrier to competition. If customers of shipping companies want them to dock there, it is hard to switch.
Britain's trade imbalance means most of the containers leaving the port are empty. London Gateway must find places to store them temporarily around the port before they can be shipped out to Asia again. It is now building an automated facility to stack 27,000 units 16 high to reduce congestion, part of an investment it expects to reach £4bn by 2030.
The port depends on logistics beyond its gates. About a third of the containers leaving are carried by train, but this was disrupted by a freight train derailment on the day I visited. Local roads are visibly ageing. “It’s not the best, although it is also not the worst,” Kris Adams, chief executive of DP World’s UK ports, observed diplomatically of Britain’s transport network.
But the UK is an attractive export market and London Gateway is in a good position. There are signs of more ships, such as the Abidjan, stopping there before heading on to European ports, rather than the other way round. Once they come, keep building.
john.gapper@ft.com
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (2026 REVISION)
NOTICE OF DISSOPTION APPLICATION
SAAO GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY LIMITED AND/OR ANY INFORMATION CONTACT THE "COMPANY"
GRAND COURT CAUSE NO. FSD0089 of (2014) (MRHCJ)
TAKE NOTICE THAT, by way of Summons, the Joint Official Liquidators of the Company shall not be entitled to the Grand Court of California for an order that the Company shall be dismissed pursuant to section 152 of the Companies Act (2026 Revision) ("the Dissolution Application"). The Company shall not be entitled to seek that the Dissolution Application is intended to seek that the Dissolution Application be dealt with by the Court administratively, i.e., on the papers without the need for a formal hearing, and should not be intended to seek that any remainder of the Company intends to object to the Dissolution Application being dealt with administratively and/or who intends to appear or otherwise be heard by the Court. The Company shall not be entitled to seek that the Dissolution Application of their intention to do so by 27 November 2026, along with the Details of the Directors' views relating to contacting the Joint Official Liquidators using the details provided below.
Dated 4 November 2026
August Madkins, Joseph J. J. Legal Liquidator
Contact for Enquiries:
Michal Segal
Email: michal.legal@j.dcg.com
(34) 545 526 8905
Address for Service:
Grant Thornton Specialist Services (Cayman) Limited
All the Chief Executive Yard, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY-14006,
Cayman I Bandis
Calls to the Financial Times Advertising Department may be monitored.
Acceptance of any advertisement for publication will be subject to the then current terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications.
A copy of the terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications can be obtained from +44 (0)20 7873 3000, or viewed at www.FT.com/ advertising
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (2026 REVISION)
NOTICE OF DISOLUTION APPLICATION
SAAD INTERNATIONAL BANK LIMITED
(BN JOURNAL ASSOCIATIONS) (CHINA GRAND)
GRAND COURT CAUSE NO. FSD0090 of 2014 (MRHCJ)
TAKE NOTICE THAT, by way of Summons, the Joint Official Liquidators of the Company shall not be issued to the Grand Court of Bayern, Inc. for an order that the Company shall be dissolved pursuant to section 152 of the Companies Act (2026 Revision) (the "Dissolution Application"). AND FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, the Company shall not intend to seek that the Dissolution Application be dealt with by the Court administratively, i.e., on the papers without the need for a formal hearing, and should not be intended to seek that the Company shall not intend to object to the Dissolution Application being dealt with administratively and/or who intends to appear or otherwise be heard by the Court. The Company shall not be able to contact the Joint Official Liquidators of their intention to do so by 27 November 2026, along March 31th, in relation to the President's contact to contacting the Joint Official Liquidators using the details provided below.
Dated 4 November 2026
Margot Mackinson, Joseph J. Chief Financial Liquidator
Contact for Enquiries:
Michal Segal
Email michal.segal@ajcgj.com
(84) 526-8955
Address for Service:
Grant Thornton Specialist Services (Cayman) Limited
Berkshire, Department of Treasury, Ward, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY-9006,
Cayman Islands
ceutical conglomerate Bayer and the New York Yankees baseball team.
While Apollo has been willing to lend billions against AI chips, some of its rivals have been reticent to follow it into the nascent market. Ares Management chief Michael Arougheti recently told his shareholders the firm had avoided lending money against AI chips because he did “not know how to underwrite the decline in depreciation curves on that type of technology.”
Some large commercial banks also fear becoming overexposed to individual technology giants in their loan books after a multitrillion-dollar borrowing binge, making them reluctant to lend more money over fears of growing overly reliant on any single customer.
While Apollo lent record sums in the third quarter, its quarterly results were mixed, with higher interest rates and heavy competition causing some of its activity to fall short of Wall Street forecasts.
Apollo wrote down its sprawling \$1tn investment portfolio by \$3.2bn to reflect the rise in interest rates, which hit the value of some of its fixed income and private equity investments. Spread profits at its vast insurance operations also declined because of higher funding costs from rising interest rates.
It also pulled back from writing new business at the unit due to intense competition that ate into potential profits. Quarterly inflows into the unit fell to \$19bn, the lowest figure this year.
Apollo is on track to attract about \$80bn in new insurance cash this year, roughly the same as last year.
The group recorded a net loss of \$1bn overall when accounting for markdowns to its debt portfolio, a temporary fluctuation in the accounting value of its portfolio that analysts often dismiss. Adjusted net income, used by analysts as a better proxy for its cash flows, was \$1.3bn, a bit worse than expected.

'Kill zone'
Rio Tinto acts
to halt cane
toad invasion
Cane toads threaten the biodiversity of the Pilbara region, where Rio operates, by diminishing the availability of food for indigenous species
Joshua Prieto/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
Rio Tinto is joining the battle against a marauding cane toad that is threatening to encroach on Australia's iron ore-rich Pilbara region and wreak havoc on the area's wildlife and economy.
The mining group will spend A\$28mn (\$20mn) working with scientists to turn a stretch of land between the Indian Ocean and the Great Sandy Desert in Western Australia into a “kill zone” to stop the march of one of Australia’s most destructive invasive species.
Cane toads do not pose a direct threat to Rio's iron ore mining operations in the Pilbara. However, the impact on the unique biodiversity of the region by endangering several species – including reptiles, ghost bats and mammals such as quolls and little red kalutas – would make future planning applications more difficult and increase compliance costs.
Tim Dempster, a marine biologist with Deakin University in Geelong, Victoria, said that the cost for mining companies to comply with environmental measures could rise significantly if action is not taken.
"The Pilbara is the heartland for Rio so it's the right thing to do, but it's an important thing to do for their business as well," he said. "It is the first time the toads are predicted to have a significant economic impact.
We have to plan for how the toads will shift the landscape and how companies can respond."
Six years ago Rio Tinto was scarred by international condemnation of its decision to blow up two 46,000-year-old caves sacred to Aboriginal people in Western Australia. Then chief executive Jean-Sébastien Jacques later told MPs that the “destruction of the Juukan rock shelters should not have occurred” and apologised unreservedly to the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura people.
The toads pose a cultural threat to the indigenous population of Australia as their spread has diminished the
availability of traditional food such as goannas that die after trying to eat the poisonous amphibians. There are now hundreds of millions of cane toads in the country, which are on track to reach Broome, on Western Australia's northern coast, in about two years and Pilbara by 2045.

In an effort to stop the invasion, a “kill zone” between Broome and Port Hedland is being created. Toads perish within days without access to water, so all 200 or so water sources used by cattle farmers in the 40km by 400km containment area will be made toad-proof. Dempster described the water sources as “stepping
MapLibre ©Mapcreator ©OpenStreetMap
Sources: FT research; sciencedirect.com; toadfree.zone stones for the toad invasion". Ben Phillips, a population biologist at Curtin University in Perth, said that the Rio partnership extended to the planning and management of creating the waterless border, which he compared with a "firebreak". "Rio do large infrastructure projects – the average ecologist doesn't," he said.
Chris Osborn, Rio Tinto's managing director of iron ore, rail, port and services, said 25 native species could be significantly threatened if the toads were not stopped. "Through our environment strategy we are working to protect the Pilbara's unique biodiversity," he said in a statement.
Rio is working with academics, farmers and the local indigenous community to establish and maintain the waterless barrier, which could provide lessons for turning back the toad in other areas.
“Most other approaches to invasive species have targeted the animal. This is about adapting the environment to make it uninhabitable for them. If we get it right then we won’t have to touch a toad,” Dempster said.
Cane toads were introduced almost a century ago to eat a beetle causing problems for sugarcane farmers in Queensland. The poisonous toads — native to South America — failed to eat many beetles but ate everything else. Nic Fildes in Sydney
Technology
MICHAEL ACTON — SAN FRANCISCO
Apple has warned that the “unprecedented” rise in memory chip prices and the cost of serving its AI tools would squeeze its margins even as it forecast better than expected sales for the crucial Christmas season.
Shares in Apple fell almost 2.5 per cent in lunchtime trading yesterday after the company warned of rising component costs and gave a weaker outlook for its high-margin services business.
Apple also predicted gross margins of 45 to 46 per cent in the fourth quarter of the year, less than analyst forecasts of 47 per cent.
The hit from the surging cost of memory chips overshadowed Apple's forecasts for iPhone sales for the holiday season.
Apple said that sales would rise between 7 and 10 per cent in the final quarter of this year, better than Wall Street forecasts of 6 per cent.
Chief executive John Ternus pointed to the shortage of memory chips as the boom in data centre building swallows up supply. "What we are seeing with memory pricing right now is unprecedented," he said.
Apple sales held up in the three months to the end of September, the final quarter of the company's financial
John Ternus, chief executive
year, with better than expected revenue of \$114.5bn.
Despite a record fiscal year for the company, investors were more focused on its financial outlook for the holiday season as consumers digest recent price increases and a rocky launch for the foldable iPhone Duo, which has been adversely affected by long delivery delays and reports of cracks in its screen. Apple insists the screen issues have affected only a limited number of devices.
Monday's earnings were also the first since Ternus, Apple's former hardware boss, took over as CEO in September. He has taken the reins when Apple's revenue growth is slowing from the robust pace set earlier in the year and as memory chip costs finally catch up with the consumer electronics group.
"I feel like it was a bit of a slow start for Ternus," said Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global's Visible Alpha. "The investment community is probably asking: Is this the best we can do for this level of valuation? Unfortunately, that happened to coincide with the new CEO's first earnings call."
Otto also noted that Apple's robust sales projections for the Christmas quarter appeared to be “priced to perfection” given worsening economic conditions and consumers facing a higher cost of living.
Apple reported solid performance in the third quarter, with iPhone revenue rising 17 per cent to \$57.6bn. Mac sales were better than expected at \$10.8bn.
Revenue for Apple's services business, which includes the App Store, Apple Pay and iCloud, was \$31.6bn, in line with estimates. However, it forecast services growth for the current quarter of between 8 and 9 per cent, well below the 12 per cent Wall Street expected. Net income was \$30.7bn.
Gross margin was 47.9 per cent in the third quarter, in line with its previous forecast of 47-48 per cent.
Healthcare
IVAN LEVINGSTON — LONDON
Carlyle and PAI have agreed to sell women's health business Theramex to private equity group Cinven in a deal worth €2.6bn, valuing it at almost double what the buyout groups paid for the company four years ago.
Carlyle and PAI acquired London-based Theramex, which specialises in areas such as menopause and osteoporosis, for about €1.4bn in 2022. They are jointly selling the business to Cinven, a statement released yesterday shows.
The deal valued Theramex at about €2.6bn, said people familiar with the matter, marking a strong return for its backers at a time when the private equity industry is struggling to offload assets within typical timelines.
Investors at the two companies said they had expanded Theramex's existing business, streamlined its supply chain and added new products, including via acquisitions, during their ownership.
“Women’s health is a bit of an overlooked segment in healthcare and a lot of pharma companies equate women’s health and contraception,” said Sébastien Veil, a partner at Paris-based PAI and head of its healthcare team.
“Within women’s health there are some segments like menopause, osteoporosis, endometriosis where there is a very strong social need . . . and at the same time a very significant unmet demand,” he added.
Theramex treatments span fertility, contraception and uterine health, with operations in more than 80 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. That includes providing hormone replacement therapy products for menopause symptoms.
"One part of the growth is us taking the franchise we had and doubling down and working within the market to grow the actual treatment and the diagnostic rate," said Lubna Qunash, a partner who leads European healthcare at Carlyle. "The second aspect was the successful launch of innovative new products."
The sale follows a string of European healthcare deals involving private equity groups in recent years. Those include CapVest's €10bn acquisition of German drugmaker Stada from Bain Capital and Cinven, and GTCR's €4.1bn takeover of Zentiva from Advent.
Cinven said Theramex was well positioned for further European and international growth, adding that women's health was a “structurally growing segment of speciality pharma, with significant populations still undiagnosed and undertreated”.
Pharmaceuticals
PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST — NEW YORK
Pfizer raised its profit and revenue outlook on the back of strong demand for medicines including cancer treatments and a blockbuster blood thinner, helping to offset sinking sales of the US drugmaker's Covid-19 products.
In third-quarter earnings yesterday, New York-based Pfizer said that it was expecting annual sales of between \$62bn and \$64bn, up from previous guidance of \$60.5bn to \$62.5bn, on rising revenue from non-Covid medicines.
The group also upgraded its forecast for adjusted earnings per share to between \$2.95 and \$3.05, up from guidance in August of between \$2.80 and \$3.
The upgrade makes Pfizer the latest pharma group to have lifted its outlook in recent days. Yesterday BioNTech – Pfizer's partner on its main Covid vaccine – raised the lower end of its revenue guidance despite falling vaccine sales. Obesity drugmaker Eli Lilly, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb all lifted their own revenue forecasts in earnings last week.
Pfizer is under pressure to find new sources of growth to offset slumping sales of the Covid jab that powered its earnings during the pandemic and has turned to acquisitions, including in oncology and obesity.
The company posted flat year-on-year revenue in the three months to the end of September as a 7 per cent rise in sales of non-Covid medicines offset a 29 per cent drop in revenue from its Comirnaty Covid shot and a 63 per cent fall in sales of antiviral pill Paxlovid, at constant exchange rates.
Pfizer's non-Covid medicines include blood thinner Eliquis, which brought in \$2.5bn in the quarter, boosted by higher net prices for the drug in the US. Revenue from its oncology drugs, including bladder cancer treatment Padcev, brought in \$4.3bn.
It acquired Padcev as part of its \$43bn acquisition of Seagen in 2023, giving it a portfolio of oncology medicines.
Pfizer is building its pipeline as it faces looming patent expiries between this year and 2030, including for Eliquis and breast cancer treatment Ibrance. Spending on research and development rose 18 per cent year on year.
Evan Seigerman, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said that Pfizer's results were supported by “commercial execution beyond Covid” and added: “Investors will be looking for evidence that the pipeline can help offset upcoming patent losses following recent mixed [trial results].”
COMPANIES & MARKETS
Officials weigh how to prevent further incidents after unidentified hackers ruin supermarket stock worth millions of euros

TOM WILSON — LONDON
LAURA DUBOIS — BRUSSELS
Freezers at dozens of supermarkets across Europe were targeted on Monday in the second spate of so-called freezer hacks in a month, leaving investigators questioning who would target the continent's frozen food in one of the most mysterious cyber attacks in recent years.
All told, incidents have been reported this week in almost 100 stores operated by a variety of retailers across Sweden, Finland, Ireland, Belgium, Luxembourg and Estonia.
The attacks, which saw hackers remotely turn up the temperature in refrigeration units to as high as 55C, followed a similar series of hacks targeting 700 supermarkets in France during one night in October.
The incidents, which ruined food worth millions of euros, have been described by EU officials as a deliberate assault on the continent's food security. Yet no group has claimed responsibility.
Attacks on industrial hardware, known in the cyber security industry as operational technology or OT, have been documented since the early 2000s.
However, such attacks have typically required specialised knowledge and been targeted at specific infrastructure in particular countries. Perhaps the most famous OT attack involved the US and Israel launching a piece of malware known as Stuxnet against Iran's nuclear programme in 2009.
Refrigeration units have been hit before. Last year, the US justice department accused a pro-Russian hacking group of disabling refrigeration systems at a meat-processing plant in California in November 2024. However, OT cyber security specialists say they have never seen hundreds of similar targets attacked at the same time.
Robert Lee, chief executive of cyber security company Dragos and a leading expert on OT attacks, said large language models had made it easier for hackers to access the expertise needed to target niche industrial hardware. Attackers were aided, he added, by the fact that more equipment was now connected to the internet to allow for remote operations.
“Adversaries have always wanted to go after OT,” he said. “It’s the changes we’ve made in our industry like connectivity and moving to homogeneous infrastructure as well as the advancements in adversary knowledge and capabilities that have opened the attack surface and made this possible.”
The attack was not technically complex. Hackers used known vulnerabilities to penetrate the systems that remotely control each unit's temperature.
Among the suppliers affected during the French attacks was Danfoss, a Danish company, which then told its customers to update hardware and software to patch a security gap in its control systems. Meanwhile, supermarkets were advised to update their internet security settings.
“Since we were aware of this vulnerability, the supermarket chains and all the cooling companies started to remediate the vulnerabilities, but not all shops yet made the necessary steps to have a secure internet connection,” said
Spoiled food at a retailer in Sweden following the latest freezer hacks on almost 100 European stores. Below: Ireland's Supervalu was a target of the attacks as well as an ICA supermarket in Stockholm, bottom Johan Nilsson/EPA/Shutterstock


Stephan Moelans, the chief executive of Belgian refrigerator company Sabcobel.
This allowed hackers to use “a backdoor to enter into the controller and change the settings of the cooling installations” in those retailers that were not using a secure internet connection, Moelans said. About 20 shops using his equipment were affected in the most recent hacks, including Carrefour, Spar and Delhaize supermarkets, he added.
The shops that had put up additional security measures, such as disconnecting from the public internet or using virtual private networks that shield the connection, had not been vulnerable despite the backdoor, said Moelans.
Danfoss confirmed that its systems were compromised and reiterated that it had told customers to disconnect systems from public IP addresses, update to the latest firmware and use “appropriate network protection”.
Blackstone-backed industrials company Copeland, which makes the Dixell brand, confirmed yesterday that “certain” monitoring systems used to control refrigeration at supermarkets were “impacted by the reported cyber security vulnerability” this week.
Following the French supermarket attacks in October, cyber security experts said the hackers might be anyone from disaffected western teenagers to a state-backed adversary with a strategic goal.
Whereas hacks of IT systems often leave some form of digital footprint, attacks on OT systems leave fewer traces, making attribution harder.
Tom Hegel, a cyber threat researcher at security group Sentinel, said he suspected that the attacks actually started in August with a series of hacks of freezers at several US military bases. Given the similarities, Hegel said the three sets of attacks were “very likely” associated with the same group and that the group was most likely linked to Russia.
The objective for Russia would be to cause deniable economic and psychological damage in Europe, he said. "It's a very affordable hack that has massive financial impacts to the targets," he continued. "This is something that anyone can pull off in terms of technical sophistication and capabilities yet has lasting financial and psychological impact."
Had the attacks been committed by a different group, Hegel would have expected them to claim responsibility either publicly or on private hacker forums. Russia, meanwhile, has increasingly adopted “ambiguity” as a tool of its cyber warfare, he said: “They want all of these nations to be confused about who could have done this and that creates domestic chaos, political chaos.”
The European Commission is set to debate the issue and EU food and agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen is set to meet retail group Ahold Delhaize to discuss the attacks.
"I will continue to follow developments closely and seek a comprehen-
sive overview of the preparedness plans retailers have in place to respond to such incidents," Hansen said.
KINDNESS & LEADERSHIP
Such equipment should be run on “a virtual network where systems can only communicate in a limited space”, he said, noting there were obvious challenges in sectors that lacked big cyber security budgets and technical expertise. “There is always a cost. You have to configure it, you have to maintain it.”
Miguel De Bruycker, head of Belgium's Centre for Cybersecurity, advised that companies in sectors such as retail, manufacturing and utilities should avoid connecting industrial equipment to the open internet.
The risk, however, had risen dramatically in the past six months, he continued. "Almost everyone is vulnerable and can be a victim of an attack." See Markets and Markets Insight
Financials
We encourage the leaders of today and tomorrow, no matter their role or background, to #LeadWithKindness
LEE HARRIS
Todd Boehly's insurer has built up more than \$3bn in lending linked to a Beverly Hills real estate project he is developing, highlighting the investor's use of policyholders' funds to finance his wider empire.
Boehly owns Security Benefit through his holding company Eldridge Industries, whose property affiliate Cain is a lead developer of One Beverly Hills, a residential, retail and hotel project in the Californian city.
Eldridge on Monday disclosed that as of September, Security Benefit had \$1.6bn in outstanding loans to Eldridge entities “supported by their holdings” in One Beverly Hills, along with \$1.4bn in project debt.
The investments represent an unusually concentrated bet by the \$67bn insurer and come amid growing regulatory scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest when insurers lend to businesses linked to their owners.
Andrew Granato, an insurance and securities law professor at the University of Texas, said it was striking that Security Benefit was investing in “an affiliated entity that also needs a vast amount of debt in order to conduct its own operations”.
Taken together, the loans are equivalent to roughly 4.5 per cent of Security
Benefit's \$67bn in admitted assets.
50 LEADING LIGHTS UK
Kansas, where the insurer is regulated, requires such a company to give regulators an opportunity to review certain investments if they exceed 3 per cent of its assets.
Regulatory filings show Security Benefit has lent more than \$1bn to five trusts that each own 20 per cent of OBH PE Investor, an entity affiliated with the insurer. The insurer said: "Security Benefit is well aware of the limitations that the Kansas Insurance Holding Company
Act places on entering into affiliated transactions, and we are in full compliance with those limitations and all other applicable laws and regulations."
One senior insurance lawyer told the FT that 3 per cent was “a magic number for regulators – whether you divide those up in five different [special purpose vehicles] doesn’t make any difference”.
Security Benefit declined to say whether the more than \$3bn in loans represented the full extent of its exposure to One Beverly Hills, or whether it had obtained regulatory approval for the investments.
The insurer, which last year counted more than 900,000 active policies and retirement accounts in force, has for years been one of the largest investors in affiliated assets – holdings linked to entities with ties to an insurer's owner.
Such investments have faced increased scrutiny since a federal investigation this year into Mark Walter, a longtime business partner of Boehly, revealed that insurers Walter controlled had misclassified more than \$20bn in affiliated private investments by stating they were unaffiliated.
Three industry analysts and one lawyer, who all asked not to be named, suggested the lending to OBH PE Investor through five trusts may have helped Security Benefit avoid triggering a regulatory review.
Its investments in One Beverly Hills include mortgage loans and so-called collateral loans, which are backed by other assets.
Collateral loans have faced criticism from regulators in recent months, with one state regulator describing the structure as a form of “capital arbitrage” that was “being actively exploited”.
Security Benefit is by far the largest user of collateral loans among US life insurers, accounting for almost half the industry's loans at the end of 2025.
Nevelina Aleksandrova, Lead Engineer, Public Library of Science (PLOS)
Dr Samreen Ashraf, Associate Head of Business School, Bournemouth University
Nathan Atkinson, Co-Founder, Rethink Food CIC
Surosh Azizi, Head of Finance, Gailarde
Tessa Baker, Professor of Cosmology, Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth
Jenny Barron, Director, EY
Roo Begom, Director, Committed Support
Christopher Box, Global Relationships Partner, PwC
Charlene Braithwaite, Student Disability & Wellbeing Officer, London College of Contemporary Music (LCCM)
Edward Brooks, Executive Director, The Oxford Character Project
Sharon Butler, Global Head of HR, Onnec
Kimberley Canning, Employee Experience Lead UK & IRE, Teleperformance (TP)
Katerina Chantzi, Facilitator & Organisational Development/ Learning & Development Consultant
Jenni Dunman, Founder & CEO, Daisy First Aid
Christina Dymioti, Founder, Fashion Heritage Network Cyprus
Cathy Elliott, Head of Streatham & Clapham High School, GDST
Bamidele Farinre, Agile Project Manager, Openclassrooms

Rebecca Henley, Senior Campaign Manager, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Tyler Hinkson, Partnership & Development Lead, TRIYBE
Darren Hopgood, Youth Football Coach, Harwell & Hendred Youth Football Club
Dex Hunter-Torricke, President, The Center for Tomorrow
Jacqueline Johnston-Fisher, Head of Services DJK House, Vitality Homes
Sana Kardar, Biomedical Scientist and Policy Innovator, House of Commons
Nicole Knott, Partner, PwC UK Pam Ledward, Director for Social Care Practice, Family Rights Group
Susie Ma, Founder and CEO, Tropic
Anne-Marie McBrien, Director of Faculty Services, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Jo Middleton, Director, International Institute for Canine Ethics
Koyesha Mukherjee, Founder and CEO, The Leading You(n)th
Dr Nitha Naqvi, Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist, Royal Brompton Hospital & Evelina London Children's Hospital part of GSTT (Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust)
Amy Nicholas, Director, Morgan's Butchery Ltd
Carolyn Pepper, Partner, Reed Smith LLP
Vince Pizzoni, Associate Professor, University of Nottingham
Flavia Popescu, Founder & CEO, The Manor of Oak
@kindnessrules\_
in @KindnessRules
kindnessrules.co.uk
Roxanne Potts, Chief Partnerships Officer, Inner Spark, Goyal Foundation
Dr James Punch, Positive Behaviour Support Lead, IBC Healthcare
Promila Raina, Youth Engagement Manager, Essex Cricket
Hayley Roffey, Co-CEO, Global Fund for Children
Nicola Rollock, Professor of Social Policy & Race, King's College London and Director of NIANRO Consulting
Sasha Samjic, Director and Therapeutic Lead, First Steps Care
Isaac Samuels, Head of Partnerships, Campaigns & Influence, People's Voice Media
Gillian Sandstrom, Associate Professor in the Psychology of Kindness, University of Sussex
Fiona Severs, Director of Community, Keystone Law
Ramsha Shahid, Partner, Privity Legal
Serene Singh, Welfare Officer, St Peter's College, University of Oxford
Julie Stephens, People Director, UK Insurance and Functions, Bupa
Carien van der Hoop, Global Lead, OTC Infrastructure, London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG)
Payal Walker, Founder & Co CEO, Women on Boards CIC
Sandra Wiggins, Founder & Co - CEO, Women on Boards CIC
Fareeha Zeshan, Chief Empowerment Officer, Million Smiles Global

UK COMPANIES
(No text to output)
Retail
Gordon Brothers chiefs will be brought before MPs for questions over demise
JIM PICKARD
DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR
Poundland's owners will be hauled before MPs within days to explain their role in the discount retailer's looming insolvency after the business select committee agreed yesterday to call in executives from distressed investor Gordon Brothers.
Labour MP Liam Byrne, chair of the influential committee, said it would kick off an inquiry into Poundland's demise, which has prompted ire across the political spectrum. The committee has written to Gordon Brothers summoning its executives for public scrutiny in the House of Commons.
"All the reports are that Poundland is a viable, profitable business, not a business to crash, burn, break off and sell off piece by piece," Byrne told the FT. "So we are asking Gordon Brothers to appear to clear up the mystery of what's stopping taking the deal on the table to save over 12,000 jobs."
Poundland last week filed a notice of intent to appoint administrators at the High Court, setting the stage for one of the biggest high street failures of recent years.
Gordon Brothers was accused by MPs yesterday of “predatory capitalism” and behaving like a “vulture” after turning down a rescue deal from Martin Property Group, a Northern Ireland-based real estate investor and developer.
In addition to the select committee hearing, business secretary Jonathan Reynolds will meet Gordon Brothers' executives within days.
Kate Dearden, a junior business minister, said that Reynolds had arranged a meeting with Gordon Brothers “to press our concerns and establish the facts”.
Dearden said the government wanted an outcome “that protects as many jobs as possible”.
The collapse of Poundland, which trades from about 600 stores, would represent a setback to Prime Minister Andy Burnham's pledge to revitalise the country's high streets. The likeliest outcome is chunks of the retailer's store estate are taken on by other retailers but that hundreds of shops close for good.
Gordon Brothers' insistence that bidders repay a £30mn loan in full diminished the chances of a rescue deal, according to people familiar with the matter. It inherited the loan from Poundland's previous owner when it bought the retailer for less than £1 last year.
Gareth Snell, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, said the investor was guilty of “predatory capitalism”.
Poundland was set up 36 years ago and became renowned for selling a range of items from plates to detergent at a uniform price of £1. The company, which has struggled with fierce competition and rising costs, reported an £85.2mn loss for the year to September 2025 on revenue of £1.5bn.
Gordon Brothers told the government it supported Poundland with “£85mn of additional financing” since buying it. It blamed factors including inflation, higher staffing costs and “severe levels of shoplifting” for its plight.
Gordon Brothers did not respond to a request for comment. Additional reporting by Laura Onita in London
Energy
RACHEL MILLARD
Drax and Brookfield have announced plans to develop vast data centre capacity at the energy group's wood-fired power station in North Yorkshire with Qatari backing.
The arrangement could see Drax's biomass plant powering AI models by next decade, although initially the electricity would come from the broader grid through an existing connection.
The UK energy group and the Canadian infrastructure investor Brookfield said they were joining forces to try to get up to 100 megawatts of data centre capacity up and running by 2028, increasing to 500MW by 2031 and up to 1 gigawatt in the 2030s.
The second phase would bring the data centre “behind-the-meter”, meaning it would take electricity directly from the biomass plant. The plans were likely to require investment of up to £2.5bn in its first phase and up to £20bn in total, Drax said.
A joint venture between Brookfield and Qai, a subsidiary of the Qatar Investment Authority, will provide initial investment for the project. Brookfield's UK AI platform Radiant will develop the project with Drax.
London-listed Drax has been looking for revenue to replace its current government subsidies, which are provided on the basis of biomass being a renewable source of electricity. The government extended the backing last year to 2031 on the basis that the Drax plant was needed to maintain the UK's "near-term security of supply" for electricity.
Data centre developers are looking to set up in the UK but have challenges accessing sufficient power supplies and land – both of which Drax can offer.
The government wants to attract data centres and announced in last week's Budget a “covenant” aimed at helping large projects get up and running.
The Drax and Brookfield partnership is at an early stage: the companies will need to secure government approvals as well as a data centre tenant for the site.
Drax's chief executive Will Gardiner said the project would "help secure the long-term future of the site and protect hundreds of jobs".
Drax shares closed up 6.6 per cent yes- terday.

Virgin Media O2 has lost more than 55,000 customers this year, having shed 138,400 last year. The broadband provider employs about 16,000 people glosszoom/Alamy
Virgin Media O2 is to cut thousands of jobs and slash spending as the UK telecoms group moves to ease investor concerns over a £22bn debt pile.
The UK's second-largest broadband provider said yesterday that it would cut £300mn in staff costs by 2029, equivalent to about 30 per cent of the total, as part of a wider £800mn cost-cutting programme.
VMO2, which employs about 16,000 people, declined to comment on how many jobs would be cut.
The move comes after the telecoms group, which is jointly owned by Liberty Global and Telefónica, was rocked by a sell-off in its bonds in the summer over concerns that fierce price competition from small fibre network operators was hitting its ability to service its debt.
The price of VMO2's safest debt was trading at about 71 pence in the pound on Monday, down from about par at the beginning of the year.
Some of the group's riskier debt – about £1.7bn of complex credit instruments called vendor financing notes – reached the equivalent of 41 pence in recent weeks.
Lutz Schüler, chief executive, said the “tough” decisions were necessary for the company’s “future success and growth”.
“Given the market conditions we face, the regulatory backdrop in fibre and the technological changes sweeping across all areas of the
economy, standing still and doing what we've always done is not an option," he said.
The FT reported in September that VMO2's owners were targeting hundreds of millions of pounds in cost cuts in a bid to ease investor concerns over the company's finances.
The cuts were announced yesterday alongside VMO2's third-quarter results, which showed the company lost 23,000 broadband customers between July and September.
The company has now shed more than 55,000 customers this year, having lost 138,400 last year.
VMO2 also confirmed an FT report from last week that it would scrap a planned upgrade of its cable network to newer fibre technology to cut spending.
James Ratzer, an analyst at New Street Research, said the new cost-cutting measures were “simply a necessity to try to stand still against competitors given the pressures on broadband pricing”.
In addition to the cuts, VMO2 said it would be exploring opportunities to use other companies' broadband networks in areas its own 19mn infrastructure did not reach.
The FT reported last week VMO2 was in advanced talks with BT over a deal to use its 25mn home fibre network. The company did not comment on the talks yesterday. Kieran Smith in London
Retail
LAURA ONITA AND ASHLEY ARMSTRONG
Asda has appointed David Potts, the former boss of rival Wm Morrison, as chief executive to turn round the fortunes of the UK's third-largest supermarket.
Potts joined the Leeds-based grocer with immediate effect yesterday, succeeding retail veteran Allan Leighton, who becomes non-executive chair after almost two years leading the business.
Leighton said Potts's experience was "exactly what we now require for the next stage of our transformation", adding that Asda had "stabilised" under his own leadership.
The group, which was bought by private equity firm TDR Capital and the billionaire Issa brothers in a £6.8bn deal agreed in 2020, has struggled with falling sales and widening losses while ceding market share to larger rivals Tesco and J Sainsbury as well as discounters Aldi and Lidl. It has also been weighed down by a heavy debt burden since its leveraged buyout.
Potts, who has spent the bulk of his career at Tesco, said he would draw on a “lifetime [of] experience” to run the supermarket chain, acknowledging that Asda had been through “a challenged moment”. “Our job is to listen to what
customers want," he told the FT.
customers want, he told the FT.
The news comes amid heightened speculation over consolidation in the fiercely competitive UK grocery industry. The FT reported last month that Sainsbury's and Morrisons held merger talks this year, before the former walked away. Industry executives have said that the possibility of a union between Asda and Morrisons should not be discounted.
Potts's "excellence in operational execution" would be a good fit with Leighton's "pizzazz", according to a person close to the recruitment process.
Since returning to Asda as executive chair in November 2024, Leighton has sought to restore its value credentials by investing heavily in price cuts while improving product availability, store standards and the overall shopping experience.
There have been tentative signs of recovery under his tenure. Like-for-like sales excluding fuel rose 0.2 per cent in the seven weeks to August 18 — the first growth in more than two years, according to the company.
But the recovery remains fragile. Sales fell 0.5 per cent in the 12 weeks to October 4, while market share slipped to 11.5 per cent from 11.8 per cent a year earlier, according to data from Worldpanel by Numerator.
Asda's problems have been compounded by a botched separation of its IT systems from former owner Walmart, which disrupted product availability and delayed its turnaround.
“David’s record in the industry speaks for itself, and having recently worked with [some of the] Asda executive team and other colleagues, I know he will quickly make an impact,” Leighton said.
Retail & consumer
LAURA ONITA — LONDON
Unilever has unveiled plans to cut a further €1bn of costs and changes to its operating model as the maker of Dove soap seeks to convince investors the separation of its food business has set the stage for faster growth.
The consumer goods group said yesterday that it planned to make productivity savings of €1bn by the end of 2029 by cutting “stranded costs” arising from the spin-off and making savings through “organisational simplification, process redesign and technology initiatives”.
Unilever will provide investors with more details of its plans at an investor day today.
Last year, the FTSE 100 company's board abruptly replaced former chief executive Hein Schumacher with its chief financial officer, Fernando Fernandez, after losing patience with the pace of his turnaround.
Since taking the top job, Fernandez has agreed a \$66bn deal to combine Unilever's food division with spice maker McCormick, uniting Hellmann's mayonnaise and French's mustard into one portfolio.
Activist investor Nelson Peltz, a Unilever shareholder who joined the company's board in 2022, spent years
agitating for a break-up of the conglomerate.
The deal, which is expected to complete by the middle of next year, received a lukewarm reception from investors when it was announced in March.
Fernandez has since promised a “sharper, more focused” group centred on beauty, personal care and home care.
Unilever said yesterday that it would operate under the principle of “global strategy, local execution" with a focus on simplifying processes across its business. A "lean" central function will be supplemented by local teams more accountable for their performance.
The group will prioritise faster-growing beauty and wellness brands and markets such as India and the US.
The new cost-cutting target comes after Unilever hit its previous goal, set in 2024, of achieving €800mn of annual savings by the end of 2026.
The company said that it expected its results in 2027 to be in line with its medium-term target for annual underlying sales growth of between 4 and 6 per cent, underlying volume growth of at least 2 per cent and modest improvement in its underlying operating margin.
Analysts at RBC Capital Markets said the targets for volume and sales growth were challenging but largely expected by the market. “We don’t expect a significant share price reaction from the [capital markets day] if this is the shape of what is to come,” they added.
Oil & gas
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Shell will sell its stake in Australia's largest gasfield to the investment arm of Abu Dhabi's national oil company for \$1.45bn as part of a strategy to shed its mature assets.
The Anglo-Dutch oil major said yesterday that it had agreed to sell its 16.7 per cent share of the North West Shelf project to XRG, the energy investment arm of Adnoc.
"The sale realises value from a mature, non-operated asset and supports Shell's strategy by focusing investment on advantaged integrated gas positions, as NWS transitions in the future towards a third-party toll-processing model," said Cederic Cremers, head of Shell's integrated gas operations.
Shell has been an investor in the North West Shelf, which is operated by Woodside Energy and sits off the coast of Western Australia, since the 1960s. The offshore gasfield has helped Australia become one of the world's most significant energy exporters, with much of the shipments going to trading partners in the Asia-Pacific region.
Shell put its North West Shelf stake on the block this year after selling out of Browse, another Woodside offshore gas project under development, in 2023.
The sale is part of Shell's strategy to offload mature assets. It also reflects the North West Shelf's transition to processing gas for third-party companies from its liquefied natural gas terminal in Karratha.

The North West Shelf stake will be sold to Adnoc's investment arm
XRG signalled its interest in Australia's energy market when it made a failed \$18.7bn bid for Santos, the country's second-largest oil and gas developer, last year. The company was established by Adnoc in 2024 to acquire international assets in gas, chemicals and low-carbon energy.
"This investment advances XRG's strategy to build a leading international gas business serving growing demand across Asia-Pacific," said Mohamed Al Aryani, president of XRG International Gas.
The Australian government approved an extension of the North West Shelf project to 2070 last year, which angered environmental groups.
Chevron, BP and Japan's Mitsui and Mitsubishi are also shareholders in the project.
Last month Infineum, a UK-based chemicals group backed by Shell, said it was exploring an \$8bn sale as the energy major tried to refocus on its core oil and gas operations by offloading more peripheral parts of its business.
COMPANIES & MARKETS
Crypto. Blockchains

NIKOU ASGARI — LONDON
North Korean hackers are expected to take months to launder the billions of dollars of tokens they stole last week from crypto exchange Binance, say analysts, despite using sophisticated automation in an attempt to hide their tracks.
The FBI has blamed the heist on TraderTraitor, a hacker group linked to the secretive state, saying it expected the stolen assets to be widely laundered before being cashed out. Of the \$6.3bn initially stolen, about \$3.3bn remains under the group's control after some tokens were frozen.
Although the thieves began laundering the stolen crypto immediately and are using automated tools to carry out thousands of transactions, cryptotracing experts say the process will take months or longer.
The stolen tokens are visible to law enforcement on public blockchains, but the hackers are embarking on a long and complex process to shift them in small quantities through numerous venues as they try to make tracing the flow of funds as difficult as possible.
"This is going to be weeks, months and maybe even years . . . They will sit on them for a long period of time and try to identify opportunities to cash out," said Phil Larratt, senior director of global services at Chainalysis, a blockchain-tracing company that is working with Binance.
Jonathan Levin, co-founder of Chainalysis, said the hackers had “too much money for their trusted laundering venues to handle”, so the funds were being broken down into smaller chunks and sent “to a wider network of services”.
Key to the laundering effort are decentralised finance lending markets and crypto swapping services – used to swap one type of crypto for another without owners having to sell any tokens – which the hackers are using to convert the stolen tokens into other assets. They are using sophisticated automation methods to split up and send the funds to thousands of new wallets in an attempt to speed up the movement of money and make tracing harder.
The Tron blockchain, created by crypto mogul and Donald Trump donor Justin Sun, is regarded as an important tool for money launderers. The Anti-Money Laundering Network has called Tron “a notorious platform for sophisticated money laundering schemes”, favoured by criminals because of its “high-speed transactions and low fees”.
Analytics company Elliptic said each dollar's worth of tokens that the hackers laundered through Tron had already moved nine times by the weekend, underlining the scale of the operation. At the height of the activity on Saturday, one transaction was sent every three seconds, it said.
Experts said that conventional software automation was being used, rather than agentic AI. "It looks like scripts run by people," said Tom Robinson, cofounder of Elliptic, and that there had been "pauses that looked like human working patterns".
Binance is still investigating how the
The path of the money stolen from Binance Estimated flows between Oct 29 and Nov 2\* hackers managed to compromise its systems, but yesterday revealed that the attackers had set up fake job interviews to trick a software engineer into installing malicious code on its systems. It is also working with the FBI and blockchain analytics companies to trace the funds.

\* Figures may not sum between start and end dates due to fluctuation in crypto/USD exchange rates \*\* Swapped for ETH through DEXs and lending protocols; swapped for TRX through DEXS, then bridged
Source: Elliptic, data as at Nov 2, 7am
One way the hackers are seeking to hide the source of funds is by converting them into other tokens through decentralised finance platforms.
So-called DeFi platforms are unregulated and often involve automated contracts carrying out functions such as lending and borrowing, rather than traditional intermediaries such as banks and brokers. Diehard crypto enthusiasts relish the fact that DeFi protocols have little oversight and many do not require customers to submit to identity checks.
For example, minutes after the theft, the hackers had swapped \$434mn worth of USDT for ethereum on decentralised exchanges and borrowed \$45mn worth of ethereum against stolen USDT posted as collateral on the decentralised lending platform AAVE, according to Elliptic.
They used another decentralised exchange called SunSwap to convert \$234mn of USDT into TRX, the native token of the Tron blockchain.
About \$215mn worth of TRX tokens were split up and sent to about 7,700 newly created crypto wallet addresses, Elliptic said. On the way, some of the TRX was swapped for USDD, a stable-coin created by Sun in 2022 that bills itself as “freeze-free”, meaning that, unlike Circle and Tether’s stablecoins, no one can freeze it.
The hackers then used so-called cross-chain bridges including THOR-Chain and Bitget Swap to convert those funds into ethereum. Cross-chain bridges move assets from one blockchain to another by taking the token on
Crypto assets displayed on the Binance app. The exchange is working with the FBI and blockchain analytics companies to trace the stolen funds — SeongJoon Cho/Bloomberg

Our global team gives you market-moving news and views, 24 hours a day ft.com/markets
the first blockchain and paying it out in the form of new tokens on the destination blockchain. At least \$147mn had been bridged out of Tron, Elliptic said. It currently sits in hundreds of new crypto wallets.
To cash out, the hackers will eventually use crypto exchanges or brokers that carry out no customer checks.
Last year, the FBI blamed TraderTraitor for a \$1.5bn theft from crypto exchange Bybit in what was at the time the biggest ever crypto hack.
"The funds will probably be cashed out in similar ways to Bybit and earlier North Korean hacks, through [over-the-counter] brokers, often Chinese-language traders," said Robinson of Elliptic, adding that such services asked "little or no questions" of their customers.
The stolen Bybit funds were eventually converted into USDT and then cashed out, with the hackers paid in traditional currencies. "Much of that happens off-chain, which makes the final steps hard to see. It is also a point of weakness for them, because USDT can be frozen," Robinson added.
North Korea yesterday denied involvement in the Binance hack. “The FBI is trying to brand the DPRK as a ‘cyber criminal state’,” the country’s official KCNA news agency quoted Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as saying.
"It is a grave political provocation against the DPRK that the US misleads the international public opinion as if all the cyber crimes in different parts of the world are our deeds."
Binance has promised to reimburse all tokens stolen by the hackers. It has said it will pay this out of its own resources, including about \$1bn worth of bitcoin held in its emergency fund. Additional reporting by Song Jung-a in Seoul
See Markets Insight
Commodities
HARRY DEMPSEY — TOKYO
STEPHANIE FINDLAY — HOUSTON
MALCOLM MOORE — LONDON
Japanese companies have embarked on a \$21bn global deal spree to strengthen their grip on gas supplies following the market turmoil triggered by conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine.
The investments since 2023 have been concentrated on shale resources in the US Gulf Coast, supporting Japan's energy security drive and Donald Trump's goal for US energy dominance, according to energy data analytics firm Enverus.
Japan is the world's second-largest buyer of liquefied natural gas after China. As well as seeking to replace disrupted Middle Eastern supplies and declining reserves in Asia, Japanese companies also have ambitions to insert themselves at the heart of the US power build-out for AI data centres and to act as a bridge to bring American LNG to developing Asian markets.
Japan has now overtaken the UK, Canada and Australia as the primary source of foreign investment in US gas resources, accounting for two-fifths of the total over the previous four years.
"A paradigm shift has taken place for Japanese energy procurement in the wake of the Iran war with a return to bolstering diversity of supply chains, even if it comes at an additional cost,"
said Saul Kavonic, senior analyst at MST Financial.
Alongside substantial investment in US shale, Japanese LNG buyers have strengthened positions in gasfields in Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea in the past six months.
“For the gas markets this is a rearrangement caused by geopolitical circumstances,” said José Luis Vittor, oil and gas practice lead at Womble Bond Dickinson. “For the Japanese, it’s having control of the resources.”
Tokyo sent a key policy signal in its foundational energy plan, adopted last year. It stated that gas would maintain a crucial role in the power system beyond 2040 and encouraged utilities to secure long-term LNG contracts and invest in gas resources and export infrastructure.
Jera, Japan's largest power generator and the world's biggest LNG buyer, spent \$1.5bn last year to acquire the South Mansfield shale gasfield in Louisiana. Global chief executive Yukio Kani said the US was previously under-represented for a “global supply portfolio”.
Japan has had a troubled history of investing in US shale. A bout of ill-timed dealmaking in 2010-12 caused widespread impairments across the trading houses as gas prices fell.
Many are convinced that a supercycle in gas demand to power AI data centres means this time will be different.
Katsuya Nakanishi, chief executive of Mitsubishi Corporation, said the trading house's \$7.5bn deal this year for US shale gas producer Aethon would allow the group to ship gas to Europe but that its main goal was to supply American customers.
"The objective with Aethon is to capture US demand through local production for local consumption," he said.
Equities
ZIJING WU AND WILLIAM SANDLUND
HONG KONG
Chinese regulators have told banks to hold fire on company listings and large share sales in an effort to bolster the country's struggling stock markets.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has held meetings with investment banks and given informal instructions – or “window guidance” – in the past few days about pausing initial public offerings, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions.
Large sales by existing shareholders have also been temporarily suspended until the markets have recovered.
The CSI 300, mainland China's benchmark index, fell 8.5 per cent in October for its worst month in more than a decade. It is down 15 per cent this year, while the S&P 500 has gained 10 per cent.
Chinese equities have been mired in a prolonged downturn since the summer, pressured by macroeconomic issues and mounting scepticism about AI investment. A tax crackdown on offshore trusts has also prompted some billionaires to sell stocks to pay their tax bills, further weighing on markets.
Earlier interventions, ranging from state-backed fund purchases in July to recent regulatory measures limiting share sales, have failed to reverse the decline.
Chinese policymakers have previously slowed the pace of IPOs during market downturns as part of attempts to preserve liquidity.
The move threatens to put the brakes on dealmaking in China's equity markets, which had shown signs of revival after a prolonged downturn. IPO deal volume this year has reached more than Rmb292bn (\$44bn) – the highest since 2023 – according to Bloomberg data. Chipmaker YMTC is one company that had been expected to list this year but is yet to do so.
The new measures are in addition to earlier guidance last month that included stabilisation methods such as accelerated share buybacks and asking investors to curb equity sales, according to the people.
The moves were “unlikely to generate a lasting turnaround unless paired with something that addresses the structural challenges more directly”, said Thomas Mathews, Asia-Pacific head of markets at Capital Economics. “That means boosting earnings growth, which in the near term probably means monetary or fiscal support."
On Monday the CSRC, People's Bank of China and National Financial Regulatory Administration said they had held meetings with securities brokerages and fund companies on ways to stabilise stock markets. Measures include cutting the rate on its relending facility for share buybacks to 1 per cent from 1.25 per cent, boosting swap operations and encouraging share buybacks.

Market reaction was muted yesterday, with the CSI 300 ending 0.2 per cent lower and the tech-focused Star 50 index down 3.8 per cent, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng gained 0.6 per cent.
Sam Konrad, investment manager at Jupiter Asset Management, said: “This is an example of why we don’t have a fundamentally positive view on the long-term outlook for Chinese equity markets. It’s a suggestion that Chinese equity markets are reliant on government support to try and boost them.”
He added: “Over the long term Chinese equity markets have been some of the worst-performing equity markets in the world. We think the economic system in China means growth is not translated into earnings growth.”
Jason Lui, head of Asia-Pacific equity and derivative strategy at BNP Paribas, said: "While these policies may not trigger an immediate reversal of sentiment similar to September 2024, they present medium-term opportunities for investors seeking to accumulate China A-share exposure."
Chinese stocks rebounded in September and October 2024 after regulators unleashed a wave of stimulus, including two central bank liquidity facilities designed to help brokers and institutional investors buy shares.
The rally gained further momentum early last year as DeepSeek's breakthrough prompted global investors to revalue Chinese technology stocks. Confidence was then shaken by US President Donald Trump's tariff war, prompting Beijing to mobilise state-backed funds, known as the “national team”, to help set a floor for China's stock markets from April last year.
Rounds of sales in the national team's ETF and stock holdings in the first quarter of this year renewed doubts about the rally's sustainability.
The CSRC did not respond to a request for comment.
Jeff Weinstein
Partner
FJ Labs
Anil Kashyap Markets Insight
he cyber heist at Binance already offers a number of lessons for investors, regulators and policymakers. Policymakers, routinely
Policymakers routinely plan, via war games and stress tests, for a variety of financial stability risks. One thing that sets cyber attacks apart from most other risks is that it is a question of when a major financial institution will be compromised, not if.
One parlour game among financial stability experts is to speculate about why we have not yet had a massive breach. The Binance debacle suggests one possibility — maybe banks and conventionally regulated financial infrastructure are no longer the most inviting targets.
If the crypto ecosystem has been sufficiently careless about guarding against attacks, then that is where those seeking to profit from cyber crime will shift.
But there should not be much comfort to be taken from that.
Major banks are under constant attack. The law of large numbers, coupled with the way increasingly advanced AI empowers attackers, suggests it is only a matter of time before a substantial attack succeeds.
It is sometimes said that the rise of AI will allow institutions to fight back against cyber attacks on an equal footing. That is too optimistic.
AI can and should be used to identify vulnerabilities and will be part of the efforts to address them. But as the recent hack of the AI model and data repository Hugging Face makes clear, we cannot trust to technology alone.
Efforts to address deficiencies will depend on humans, who can't work and adapt as quickly as AI. Hence defence efforts will lag behind the attackers.
The early reports on the Binance hack point to the potential involvement of state-sponsored attackers.
Individual institutions will never have sufficient resources to battle such actors, and it's unreasonable to expect that they can. While there is some cooperation among major financial institutions to share information, governments have a vital role to play in creating standards that protect their citizens' best interests.
For the banking system, there is an oversight regime in place to help address the risks of an AI attack. The same is not true in the crypto
ecosystem. The lack of rigorous oversight might promote innovation, but it also makes crypto companies vulnerable. Right now, a Binance-type attack may not undermine faith in the broader financial system. But if the crypto ecosystem continues to grow and become more integrated with the traditional financial system, the impact could be far more devastating. One truism about cyber risks is that an organisation (or a financial system) is only as strong as its weakest link.
Another reason to worry is that criminals and other hostile actors could use the crypto ecosystem to train AI agents on how best to hack financial institutions. AI is improving by leaps and bounds. Different institutions use different defences. But learning how to hack one system can provide insights into how to attack another.

If the functioning of a major financial institution, or a key part of the established financial infrastructure, is compromised, that could quickly sow widespread distrust of the financial system. Trust is the grease that allows the financial system to function and to support businesses and households.
If it is badly damaged in a cyber attack instigated by a hostile nation or non-state actor, it will not be easily regained. The systemic ramifications could be far-reaching.
Banks invest heavily in guarding against these risks, and the US Treasury department and bank regulators have been working with regulated financial institutions to promote preparedness. But both the size and the nature of private sector investments are going to fall short of what is required to protect the resilience of the financial system.
Policymakers should recognise the attack on Binance for what it is: a warning shot of potentially far worse things to come.
Guarding against hacks that steal billions of dollars and undermine faith in finance requires the public sector to work closely with the private sector to enhance resilience and to develop plans should things go awry.
And allowing the crypto world – a large and growing part of finance – to remain subject to minimal oversight compromises our national wellbeing. Innovation is good but it needs to be coupled with appropriate oversight.
Anil Kashyap is a professor of economics and finance at Chicago Booth. Kathryn Judge, professor at Columbia Law School, contributed to this piece
Exploring Cyprus as a hub for fund management in a fragmented landscape


\- US stocks edge higher as voters go to the polls for midterm elections
US stock markets rose yesterday, with tech shares rebounding from their recent rout as voters across the country cast their votes in the midterm elections.
The blue-chip S&P 500 rose 0.5 per cent by early afternoon in New York, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index advanced 0.9 per cent, buoyed by semiconductor stocks. Advanced Micro Devices rose 4.9 per cent, Nvidia was up 3.2 per cent and the broader Philadelphia Semiconductor Index of US chip stocks rose 3.3 per cent.
The advance in US equities marked a return to stability following a sell-off over the past week and came as oil prices extended a decline on Monday that was prompted by an unconfirmed report of diplomatic progress in peace talks between the US and Iran.
Brent, the global benchmark for crude, fell 1.3 per cent to \$103.50 a barrel.
The dollar was up 0.1 per cent against a basket of other major currencies on the day that Americans went to the polls.
Prediction platform Polymarket was pricing a 75 per cent chance that the Democrats would take the Senate and an even higher probability of a majority in the House of Representatives.
"Markets would intuitively treat a strong result for Republicans as bullish for equities and bearish for bonds, and the opposite for a Democratic sweep,"
said Gabriele Foà, global credit portfolio manager at Algebrais Investments.
In Europe, the Stoxx 600 index fell 0.5 per cent whilst the FTSE 100 declined by 1.1 per cent, erasing four days of gains.
In Asia, South Korea's Kospi index fell 3.6 per cent whilst the Nikkei 225 slipped 0.3 per cent.
Official data yesterday showed that job openings in the US rose by 333,000 in September, while the figure for August was revised higher. Data tracking factory orders also rose more than economists expected. Analysts from Goldman Sachs added 0.1 percentage point to their
estimate of expanding third-quarter US GDP following the two data releases, taking the figure to 3.5 per cent.
Government bonds, which have come under pressure in recent months amid signs of overheating in the US economy, weakened further after the data. The two-year US Treasury yield rose 0.03 percentage points to 4.61 per cent.
Bond markets also weakened globally. The UK 10-year yield rose 0.05 percentage points to 5.24 per cent, and 10-year Bund yields were up 0.05 percentage points at 3.34 per cent.
Abigail Tobias
Markets update | US | Eurozone | Japan | UK | China | Brazil | Stocks | S&P 500 | Eurofirst 300 | Nikkei 225 | FTSE100 | Shanghai Comp | Bovespa | Level | 7580.85 | 2573.69 | 63081.86 | 10638.43 | 3608.10 | 165288.62 | % change on day | 0.52 | -0.60 | Closed | -1.14 | -0.82 | -1.57 | Currency | $ index (DXY) | $ per € | Yen per $ | $ per £ | Rmb per $ | Real per $ | Level | 101.84 | 1.119 | 158.445 | 1.342 | 6.67 | 5.496 | % change on day | 0.10 | -0.022 | 0.361 | -0.007 | 0.34 | 1.057 | Govt. bonds | 10-Year Treasury | 10-year-Bund | 10-year JGB | 10-Year Gilt | 10-year-bond | 10-year-bond | Yield | 4.96 | 3.31 | 2.80 | 5.26 | 1.63 | 15.85 | Basis point change on day | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | -0.02 | 0.39 | World / Commods | FTSE All-World | Oil - Brent | Oil - WTI | Gold | Silver | Metals (LMEX) | Level | 731.46 | 103.46 | 95.97 | 3927.06 | 49.69 | 5756.40 | % change on day | -0.06 | -1.25 | -0.51 | -1.02 | -1.88 | 1.25 | Main equity markets


Biggest movers


Prices taken at 17:00 GMT Nov 03 |
The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth. |
COSTAS MOURSELAS AND
IAN SMITH — LONDON
AMELIA POLLARD — NEW YORK
Marshall Wace and Millennium Management were among the hedge funds hit last month as investor worries over the sustainability of the AI boom triggered a sharp reversal in Wall Street's tech rally.
Marshall Wace, the \$80bn hedge fund co-founded by billionaires Paul Marshall and Ian Wace, saw its two key strategies fall in October, according to people who had seen the numbers.
The Eureka strategy, which is managed by a team of portfolio managers, was down 5.4 per cent in October, trimming its year-to-date gain to 5.3 per cent. The data- and model-driven Tops strategy lost 3.6 per cent, remaining up 1.3 per cent for the year.
Meanwhile, Izzy Englander's Millennium, which manages \$95bn, was down 2.3 per cent last month, leaving it with a 5.7 per cent gain for the first 10 months of the year.
Global hedge funds, in aggregate, lost 3 per cent last month, according to data provider PivotalPath, with equity strategies faring worst as they bore the brunt of the tech sell-off. Year-to-date gains for the industry stand in the mid-single digits, according to PivotalPath.
Billionaire Ken Griffin's hedge fund giant Citadel bucked the trend, with its
flagship Wellington fund rising 1.7 per cent for the month and up 15.3 per cent for the year.
Hedge funds, which use leverage to magnify gains, have had to navigate financial markets that have been simultaneously whipsawed by the war in Iran, AI bubble fears, rising interest rates and the US midterm elections.
The Nasdaq 100 index tumbled into correction territory last week after falling 10 per cent from its October 6 record high, as lacklustre tech earnings fuelled fears about how long it will take for the vast investments in AI to turn a profit.
Intel, in which the US government has a minor stake, was among the biggest losers, falling 29 per cent in the chip-maker's worst one-day drop since 1974.
“It’s been an ugly week all around,” said one prime broker after the Nasdaq dropped 3.5 per cent on Friday, describing how hedge funds had fared in the market upheaval.
Bond markets also endured a volatile month, particularly in the Eurozone, as oil prices climbed and France's political crisis deepened, feeding nerves about the outlook for its sovereign debt. French and Italian bonds sold off against haven German Bunds and against equivalent-duration euro interest rate swaps, resulting in big moves for relative value and spread trades that are popular with hedge funds.
Marshall Wace, Millennium and Citadel all declined to comment. | 27190.86 | 25351.86 | 
AMERICAS

Stock Market movements over last 30 days, with the FTSE All-World in the same currency as a comparison
Dow Jones Ind
FTSE 100
FTSE EuroFirst
-0.60%
-1.14%
Nikkei
Closed



Day ▷ -0.34% Month ▷ 1.36% Year ▷ 9.59% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Australia | All Ordinaries | 9308.90 | 8977.20 | Australia | S&P ASX 200 | 8886.80 | 8856.50 | Australia | S&P ASX 200 Res | 7107.30 | 7162.40 | Austria | AIX | 6396.13 | 6430.27 | Belgium | BEL 20 | 5837.52 | 5876.76 | Belgium | BEL Mid | 6448.92 | 6470.71 | Brazil | Bovespa | 165288.62 | 167921.60 | Canada | S&P TSX 60 | 2117.03 | 2135.53 | Canada | S&P TSX Comp | 35554.91 | 35801.69 | Chile | SS&P/OLX IGPA GEN | 56920.02 | 56920.02 | China | China FSE A200 | 10001.78 | 10067.56 | China | China Shanghai A | 3763.02 | 3814.59 | China | China Shanghai B | 2867.4 | 2768.98 | China | China Shanghai Comp | 3608.18 | 3638.03 | China | Shenzhen A | 2169.01 | 2194.18 | China | Shenzhen B | 1134.60 | 1137.44 | Croatia | CROBEX | 4407.77 | 4425.65 | Cyprus | CSE M&P GEN | 305.61 | 310.31 | Hang Seng
Day ▷ -0.34% Month ▷ 1.96% Year ▷ -0.72% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Czech Republic | Czech Republic PX | 2645.31 | 2638.01 | Denmark | DMX Copenhagen 20 | 1648.67 | 1646.11 | Egypt | EGX 30 | 49255.70 | 48403.10 | Estonia | OMX Tallinn | 2240.78 | 2240.51 | Finland | OMX Helsinki General | 12950.96 | 12988.77 | France | French CAC40 | 8020.31 | 8047.69 | France | SIB 120 | 6076.49 | 6094.49 | Germany | M-OAX | 30743.36 | 30855.37 | Germany | Tec-Dax | 4092.59 | 4115.74 | Germany | XETRA Dax | 25864.62 | 25881.09 | Greece | Athens | 2618.12 | 2602.41 | Greece | FTSE/ASIA | 6697.84 | 6659.10 | Hong Kong | Hang Seng | 23525.97 | 23393.32 | Hong Kong | HS China Enterprises | 7943.10 | 7906.11 | Hong Kong | HSCC Red Chip | 3961.37 | 3911.75 | Hungary | Bux | 146075.44 | 145330.02 | India | BSE Sensex | 76917.85 | 75692.78 | Indonesia | Jakarta Comp | 4904.29 | 5096.83 |
FTSE All World
\$ per €
Day ▷ -0.01% Month ▷ -0.80% Year ▷ 15.86% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Norway | Oslo All Share | 2514.81 | 2533.67 | Pakistan | KSE 100 | 168018.86 | 166564.07 | Philippines | Manila Comp | 5624.17 | 5680.35 | Poland | Wig | 155849.62 | 156383.04 | Portugal | PSI 20 | 9233.89 | 9326.46 | Portugal | PSI General | 6276.04 | 5288.08 | Romania | Romania BET Index | 34803.25 | 35086.93 | Russia | Russia Traded Index in USD | 988.10 | 988.10 | Saudi Arabia | TAHANUL All Share Index | 9676.13 | 9882.85 | Singapore | FTSE Snabs Times | 5269.29 | 5303.83 | Slovakia | SAX | 319.87 | 320.30 |
ACTIVE STOCKS
UK MARKET WINNERS & LOSERS
Day ▷ -0.82% Month ▷ -6.09% Year ▷ -9.26% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Sweden | DMX Stockholm 30 | 3294.44 | 3287.02 | Sweden | DMX Stockholm AS | 1136.89 | 1138.00 | Switzerland | SMI Index | 14743.09 | 14802.52 | Taiwan | Weighted Stock Index | 43307.54 | 44520.14 | Thailand | Bangkok SET | 1481.01 | 1507.20 | Turkey | BIST 100 | 11023.55 | 10961.67 | UK | FTSE 100 | 10038.43 | 10761.33 | UK | FTSE 4Good UK | 9296.13 | 9396.65 | UK | FTSE All Share | 5746.54 | 5608.28 | UK | FTSE techMARK 100 | 9761.22 | 9753.47 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Composite | 16438.56 | 16467.22 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Industrial | 51808.64 | 51983.69 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Transport | 20895.94 | 20842.92 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Utilities | 430.94 | 431.33 | U.S.A. | Nasdaq 100 | 28172.20 | 27989.82 | U.S.A. | Nasdaq Composite | 25051.86 | 25164.36 | U.S.A. | NYSE Composite | 24363.13 | 24372.07 | U.S.A. | S&P 500 | 7560.85 | 7541.40 | \$ per £ ¥ per \$
0.3610% |


Oil Brent \$ | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Venezuela | IBC | 8468.10 | 8479.81 | Vietnam | Viet Nam Index | 1689.02 | 1710.72 | Cross-Border | Euro Stoxx 50 (Eur) | 6144.95 | 6176.06 | Netherlands | Euronext 100 ID | 1870.83 | 1879.99 | Cross-Border | FTSE Food Global ($) | 20885.40 | 20856.02 | Cross-Border | FTSE All World ($) | 731.92 | 731.91 | Cross-Border | FTSE £300 | 2573.69 | 2589.34 | Cross-Border | FTSE Eurotop 100 | 4942.13 | 4977.12 | Cross-Border | FTSE Global 100 ($) | 5563.13 | 5534.58 | Cross-Border | FTSE Gold Min ($) | 5071.33 | 5071.33 | Cross-Border | FTSE Latibank Top (Eur) | 5542.60 | 5738.60 | Cross-Border | FTSE World ($) | 1370.23 | 1370.61 | Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 100 (Eur) | 7024.23 | 7073.68 | Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 80 ID | 8363.45 | 8403.85 | £ per € |
UK RECENT RIGHTS ISSUES | Nov 02Regions & countries | No ofstocks | US$/indices | Daily%Chg | Monthly%Chg | YTD%Chg | UTS$/Total Ret | YTD%Total Ret | Gr DivYield |
Petra Diamonds Ltd
Pennon Group PLC |
Rights Issue: 7 for 15 at 250p p.s., payable in full Oct. 26 (xr 12.10.26).
Data provided by ICE, www.ice.com
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com
FTSE 100 SUMMARY | 9.87 | Financials | 2.24 | 9.13 | Consumer Digital Services | 1.30 | 8.12 | Technology | 1.20 | 7.56 | Financials ex Inv Co. | 1.10 | 6.51 | Software & Computer Svcs. | 1.03 | 6.48 | Banks | 0.76 | 5.76 | Life Insurance | 0.76 | 5.63 | Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | -1.33 | 5.37 | Health Care | -1.45 | 4.77 | Personal Goods | -2.99 | 4.27 | Investment Banking & Brokerage | -4.31 | 3.75 | Medical Equipment & Svcs | -6.53 | 3.46 | Leisure Goods | -16.92 | 3.23 | Hold Goods & Home Care | -17.84 | 2.94 | Precious Metals & Mining | -17.87 | Nov 02Regions & countries | No ofstocks | USStim stocks | USDSailyChg | MonthlyChg | %YTD% Chg | YTDTotalRet | USSTotal Ret | YTDTotalRet | Gr DivYield | Developed ex Canada | 5149 | 1282.51 | -0.27 | -2.09 | 10.21 | 2188.43 | 11.75 | 1.55 | Developed ex Europe | 4153 | 1486.10 | -0.42 | -2.62 | 11.28 | 2378.86 | 12.56 | 1.33 | Developed ex Eurozone | 4760 | 1372.84 | -0.35 | -2.00 | 10.97 | 2278.48 | 12.41 | 1.46 | Developed ex US | 3824 | 778.13 | 0.22 | -1.31 | 10.29 | 1563.52 | 12.99 | 2.59 | Developed ex UK | 5146 | 1383.92 | -0.28 | -2.14 | 10.31 | 2278.50 | 11.71 | 1.51 | Developed ex Japan | 4018 | 1348.08 | -0.19 | -1.73 | 10.02 | 2322.21 | 11.52 | 1.53 | Developed Ex Asia Pacific ex Japan | 2301 | 806.88 | 0.50 | -6.39 | 18.55 | 1458.91 | 21.14 | 2.41 | Developed Asia Plac ex Jap | 953 | 1043.39 | 0.34 | -8.50 | 25.56 | 2306.16 | 28.69 | 2.74 | Developed Europe | 1213 | 705.37 | 0.74 | 2.17 | 4.77 | 1520.17 | 7.68 | 1.86 | Developed Europe ex UK | 991 | 101.16 | 0.18 | 1.50 | 3.74 | 1706.64 | 8.44 | 2.14 | Developed Eurozone | 606 | 692.83 | 1.00 | -1.07 | 2.11 | 1479.17 | 4.88 | 2.82 | Developed Europe Asia Plac | 3514 | 747.50 | 0.20 | -1.74 | 10.24 | 1479.17 | 4.88 | 2.82 |
FT GLOBAL 500: THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPANIES |
BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS |
See FTSE website for more details www.ftse.com/products/indices/gilts.
© 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC. All rights reserved. The Tradeweb FTSE Gilt Closing Prices information contained herein is proprietary to Tradeweb; may not be copied or re-distributed; is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely; and does not constitute investment advice. Tradeweb is not responsible for any loss or damage that might result from the use of this information.

GILTS: UK FTSE ACTUARIES INDICES | Price IndicesFixed Coupon | Nov 3 | Dayschg % | TotalReturn | MonthReturn | YearReturn | Yield | Up to 5 Years | 84.83 | -0.07 | 2666.04 | 0.40 | 1.42 | 4.76 | 5-10 Years | 142.84 | -0.29 | 3393.68 | 0.96 | -0.66 | 5.09 | 10-15 Years | 142.56 | -0.48 | 3747.60 | 1.83 | -1.45 | 5.42 | 5-15 Years | 141.16 | -0.35 | 3471.70 | 1.24 | -0.89 | 5.23 | Over 15 Years | 167.87 | -0.78 | 3371.03 | 3.46 | -3.11 | 5.63 | All stocks | 125.71 | -0.34 | 3158.20 | 1.42 | -0.61 | 5.37 | Index Linked | Nov 3 | Day'schg % | Monthchg % | Year'schg % | TotalReturn | Return1 Month | Return1 Year | Up to 5 Years | 365.88 | -0.17 | 0.10 | 3.00 | 3193.02 | 0.11 | 3.83 | Over 5 Years | 476.63 | -0.78 | 1.41 | -0.34 | 3737.40 | 1.41 | 0.29 | 5-15 Years | 460.50 | -0.47 | 0.45 | 1.68 | 3869.92 | 0.45 | 2.45 | Over 15 Years | 481.23 | -1.10 | 2.44 | -2.18 | 3635.13 | 2.44 | -1.69 | All stocks | 473.25 | -0.64 | 1.12 | 0.31 | 3787.49 | 1.12 | 0.97 | Yield Indices | Nov 3 | Nov 2 | Yr Ago | 5 Yrs | 4.89 | 4.85 | 4.26 | 10 Yrs | 5.24 | 5.19 | 4.59 | 15 Yrs | 5.50 | 5.45 | 4.88 | 20 Yrs | 5.62 | 5.57 | 5.02 | 45 Yrs | 5.42 | 5.36 | 4.91 | Real Yield 0% Inflation | Nov 3 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago | Up to 5 Years | 1.04 | 2.55 | 0.98 | 0.73 | Over 5 Years | 2.25 | 16.18 | 2.20 | 1.90 | 5-15 Years | 2.02 | 9.37 | 1.97 | 1.61 | Over 15 Years | 2.35 | 22.96 | 2.30 | 2.01 | All stocks | 2.20 | 13.27 | 2.15 | 1.86 | Real Yield 5% Inflation | Nov 3 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago | Up to 5 Years | 0.78 | 2.55 | 0.71 | 0.43 | Over 5 Years | 2.22 | 16.18 | 2.17 | 1.88 | 5-15 Years | 1.96 | 9.37 | 1.91 | 1.54 | Over 15 Years | 2.33 | 22.96 | 2.29 | 2.00 | All stocks | 2.16 | 13.27 | 2.11 | 1.82 | FT
FINANCIAL TIMES
Profit. Power. Politics. | CT PrivEq | 467.00 | -1.00 | 592.00 | 439.84 | 6.06 | 691.09 | -32.56 | HGCapital | 392.50 | -1.50 | 512.00 | 318.64 | 1.27 | 530.50 | -25.54 | HVPE | 3320.00 | -30.00 | 3500.00 | 2807.59 | — | 4541.00 | -26.89 | ICG Ent | 1404.00 | — | 1572.00 | 1288.31 | 2.99 | 2092.36 | -33.66 | Pantheon Int | 387.00 | -4.50 | 409.00 | 339.05 | — | 546.30 | -29.25 | Partners PE € | 570.76 | -8.42 | 958.06 | 567.42 | 9.50 | 11.53 | -39.81 |

All data is as of close of the previous business day. Company classifications are based on the ICB system used by FTSE. FSTE 100 constituents are shown in bold. Closing prices are shown in pence unless otherwise indicated. Highs & lows are based on intra-day trading over a rolling 52 week period. Price/earnings ratios (P/E) are based on latest annual reports and accounts and are updated with interim figures. P/E is calculated using the company's diluted earnings from continuing operations. Yields are based on closing price and on dividends paid in the last financial year and updated with interim figures. Yields are shown in net terms; dividends on UK companies are net of 10% tax, non-UK companies are gross of tax. Highs & lows, yields and PER are adjusted to reflect capital changes where appropriate. Trading volumes are end of day aggregated totals, rounded to the nearest 1,000 shares. Net asset value per share (NAV) and split analytics are provided only as a guide. Discounts and premiums are calculated using the latest cum fair net asset value estimate and closing price. Discounts, premiums, gross redemption yield (GRY) and hurdle rate (HR) to share price (SP) and HR to wipe out (WO) are displayed as a percentage, NAV in pence.
\- trading ex-dividend
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information.
Data provided by
The FT Share Service is a paid-for print listing service and may not be fully representative of all LSE-listed companies. This service is available to all listed companies, subject to the Editors discretion. For new sales enquiries please email data@ft.com. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com

Markets and data happen here.
FINANCIAL TIMES
www.ice.com

www.cpgbl.com, Email: fundservices@cpgbl.com
Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Emerging Markets Stock Fund
Atlantas Sicav | Canaccord International Fund Managers Limited | (JER) | 4th Floor at 37 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QA | +44 (0) 1534 700 104 (Int.) +44 808 169 7966 (UK) | FCA Recognised-Ireland UCITS |
[EMPTY]


Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
ARTEMIS The PROFIT HUNTER
Algebris Investments |





www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00



McInroy & Wood
Easter Alderston, Haddington, EH41 3SF, 01620 825867 |

McInroy & Wood
Easter Alderston, Haddington, EH41 3SF, 01620 825867 |



3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL
Order Desk and Enquiries: 0345 601 9610 |




Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m | Troy Asset Management (1200) | (UK) | 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL | Order Desk and enquiries 0345 608 0950 | Authorised Inv Funds | Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited |
The fund prices quoted on these pages are supplied by the fund operators, fund managers and fund administrators. Details of funds published on these pages, including prices, are for the purpose of information only and should only be used as a guide. The Financial Times Limited makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness and they should not be relied upon when making an investment decision. The sale of interests in the funds listed on these pages may, in certain jurisdictions, be restricted by law and the funds will not necessarily be available to persons in all jurisdictions in which the publication circulates. Persons in any doubt should take appropriate professional advice. Data collated by ICE. The fund prices published in this edition along with additional information are also available on the Financial Times website, www.ft.com/funds. The funds published on these pages are grouped together by fund management company. Prices are in price unless otherwise indicated. The change, if shown, is the change on the previously quoted figure (not all funds update prices daily). Those designated \$ with no prefix refer to US dollars. Yield percentage figures (in Tuesday to Saturday papers) allow for buying expenses.
OEIC: Open-Ended Investment Company. Similar to a unit trust but using a company rather than a trust structure. Different share classes are issued to reflect a different currency, charging structure or type of holder.
Bid price: Also called selling price. The price at which units in a unit trust are sold by investors.
Offer price: Also called buying price. The price at which units in a unit trust are bought by investors. Includes manager's initial charge.
Single price: Based on a mid-market valuation of the underlying investments. The buying and selling price for shares of an OEIC and units of a single priced unit trust are the same. Treatment of manager's periodic capital charge: 24 and 36 months: 24 and 36 month annualized performance figures calculated using the total gain (or loss) from that period. Performance formula is adjusted to consider the income distribution during the reference period.
Yield: Calculating using the fund's projected annual income, divided by the latest available net asset value. |
The prices appearing in the newspaper are the most recent provided by the managers/operators.
Charges for this advertising service are based on the number of lines published and the classification of the fund. Please contact data@ft.com for further information. For further queries contact newspapers@ice.com

ice.com
Markets and data happen here.
www.ice.com


ARTS

The Art Market | Charleston has commenced a £15mn fundraising campaign as the group enjoys a cultural revival. By Melanie Gerlis
Charleston, the Sussex home and retreat of the bohemian Bloomsbury set, has commenced a £15mn fundraising campaign amid a resur-
gence of the group across the UK's arts scene.
The first £1mn for the charitable trust's endowment has come courtesy of the writer Virginia Nicholson – granddaughter of the painter Vanessa Bell – and her husband, the novelist and screenwriter William Nicholson. Bell lived and worked at Charleston for more than 40 years from 1916, alongside her fellow artist and sometime lover Duncan Grant. Other regulars included Bell's sister, the writer Virginia Woolf, and the economist John Maynard Keynes, another of Grant's lovers.
Charleston's fundraising coincides with a revival of interest in the Bloomsbury set. The latest West End play by celebrated writer James Graham, The Standard of Living, explores the impact of Keynes' time at Charleston on his influential economic theories. Next week, Tate Britain opens a show that charts the creative partnership between Bell and Grant and how their group's "commitment to living lives centred around freedom and radical experimentation" reshaped culture and thought in Britain. This will include a restaging of their Charleston studio, borrowing from among the 4,000 individual items maintained in the rooms of the Sussex house.
For Virginia, named after her great aunt and painted by both Bell and Grant, "I've seen the whole story, I've known Charleston all my life, I hold the historical memory of the Trust", she says. The social historian's first book, written in collaboration with her father Quentin Bell (Vanessa's son with Clive Bell), details the Firle farmhouse and its 20th-century history (Charleston: A
Clockwise from main: Charleston's eclectic interior; artist Vanessa Bell (c1910); painter and designer Duncan Grant (1957) — Lewis Ronald; George C. Beresford/Hulton Archive/Getty; John Hedgecoe/Popperfoto
Bloomsbury House & Garden, 1997). For William: “Charleston’s not mine, I’ve married into it, but it is extraordinary what it has done for our life.” With characteristic vim, he explains that “it brings together people who are interesting, and you actually meet them in real life, not this bloody digital life. If there is anything that I want to survive, then it’s that.”
The Nicholsons' donation represents "a huge chunk of our pension, we are not super-rich", William says. He adds, though, that "I was overpaid for quite a number of years", notably, he says, when brought in as an emergency third writer for Ridley Scott's 2000 epic film Gladiator.
The hope, they say, is to encourage others to donate. William's pitch is that "it seems to me that having an endowment is sexy, because it means immortality, and immortality is sexy". It has already worked: when we meet in the Nichols' Sussex family home, there is delight that the British fashion designer Kim Jones, creative director for Bosideng's Areal label, has just matched their £1mn, confirms Nathaniel Hepburn, director and chief executive of Charleston since 2017.
Tate's exhibition, Vanessa Bell & Duncan Grant: Inside Bloomsbury, will cement Bell's reputation as an artist, her granddaughter believes. Grant lived longer, and had success in his time, while Bell "underestimated herself, she tended towards – surprise, surprise – 'Duncan was the genius, the brilliant artist, I am just the woman trailing in his wake'," Virginia says. She adds: "Vanessa's art was not so much eclipsed by Duncan Grant, as by Virginia Woolf," who was
acclaimed as a writer from the 1920s.
Charleston's appeal has proved international, including among a group of eight people who have promised gifts in their wills amounting to an additional £2mn for the endowment, Hepburn says. Among these donors, he says, are a gay couple in the US who had their first date at Charleston and “an octogenarian in New Mexico”, who comes regularly to the springtime Charleston Festival. This year’s line-up for the two-week series of talks and events included the Iranian-British author Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe (a prisoner in Iran for almost six years), the actor and singer Olly Alexander and the artist Rose Wylie.
To fund the legal costs of setting up the endowment, another couple cashed in some Tesla stock, “from which they didn’t want to benefit personally”, Hepburn says, referring to the electric-car maker whose chief executive is Elon Musk. “They enjoy the irony that this is being used to save a nicely painted, liberal, progressive, queer house in the Sussex countryside,” Hepburn notes.
The endowment has been in the planning since Charleston was founded as a charity in 1980. “It was always talked about, but every time money came in, it was so desperately needed elsewhere that it had to be diverted . . . We lurched from crisis to crisis for quite a while,” says Virginia, a longtime trustee and now president of the trust.
Despite being something of a national treasure, Charleston receives no regular public funding, relying on entrance fees (with monthly pay-what-you-can days) and its shop and café, as well as membership, venue hire and one-off donations. Total income last year was £4.5mn, with expenditure at £4.3mn, according to the Charity Commission.
“Until a certain number of years ago, we were a seasonal, heritage tourism site and that’s not what the Arts Council or local authorities are set up to support,” Hepburn explains. Now, he says: “We are interdisciplinary, all year round . . . across two sites [they opened a cultural centre in Lewes in 2023] and we will look to the Arts Council for revenue support. Having an endowment doesn’t make the charity rich, we can’t spend that money. We still need to fundraise for the learning programme, the exhibitions, the events.”
Hepburn is also in the thick of the “50 for 50” project, to mark Charleston’s 50th year as a charity in 2030. “The two birthday presents that we want to give are a £15mn endowment and a collection of 50 of the most important and exciting Bloomsbury pieces [of art] that are still in private ownership,” Hepburn says. This has already brought in an angular Roger Fry portrait of the novelist E M Forster (1911) and, this week, the donation of what is believed to be Grant’s final portrait of Bell, a pencil and biro drawing of her with her eyes closed, dated a week after she died of bronchitis in 1961.
The intimacy and tenderness of the drawing underlines Charleston's mythology as a place of meaningful relationships at a time, as William sees it, of "heading towards a world in which all knowledge is contained within a computer". Virginia is of a similar mind: "People lived then how people want and wish they lived now."
charleston.org.uk
Francis Bacon
Jean Fautrier
Lucian Freud
Alberto Giacometti
Richard Hamilton
Liliane Lijn
Marlow Moss
Eduardo Paolozzi
Germaine Richier
Niki de Saint Phalle
Graham Sutherland
William Turnbull
9 OCTOBER—11 DECEMBER 2026
ORDOVAS
ORDOVASART.COM
hey call it the Fonzi: a multi-billion-dollar financial scandal that has torched the savings of half a million Turks, enraged President
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and shaken his government to the core.
“Fonzie” or “The Fonz” was also the leather-jacketed hero of the 1970s US sitcom Happy Days. But there is nothing happy about the popping of Turkey’s Fonzi bubble. Instead, it is a \$20bn investment fund crisis, its name a mixture of the Turkish word for fund and a reference to Ponzi schemes. “The scale of what is going on is not fully appreciated internationally; this is the leading topic in national conversation,” says Atilla Yesilada of GlobalSource Partners, an Istanbul-based consultancy.
The Fonzi scandal has shaken confidence in Turkey's already struggling \$1.8tn economy, even as Ankara is viewed by Nato allies as an increasingly important bulwark against Middle East instability and Russian revanchism. Over 455,000 retail investors, who were sucked into funds with visions of 1,000 per cent returns, risk seeing their savings lost. Most important of all, and unlike other scandals such as Bernard Madoff's swindle, Turkey's Fonzi crisis is alleged to reach into the highest echelons of government.
To critics, including some within the administration, it is symptomatic of a late-stage cronyism that has hollowed out Turkish institutions after 24 years of increasingly centralised rule – just as questions about Erdoğan's political succession have come to the fore.
A foretaste of the scandal came months before it exploded, when an opposition lawmaker raised a pointed question in Turkey's parliament.
Turkey's capital markets have become “a quagmire”, Ayyüce Türkeş Taş declared, adding that investors were being defrauded through “pooling techniques, self-trading and manipulation”. She noted that even Turkey's finance minister had issued a similar warning and asked why no action was being taken. Her counterparts in the ruling Justice and Development Party, known in Turkish as the AKP, brushed the question aside. Market disruptions are being “resolutely combated”, one said. The “financial architecture” of Erdoğan's vision of a “Turkish century” is “solid”, he added, to cheers from government benches. An investigation proposed by the opposition was swiftly voted down. That exchange, recorded in parliamentary transcripts, took place in December 2025.
Almost a year later, the roll call of establishment figures caught up in the scandal grows virtually every day.
Among those arrested and remanded in custody are the former head of the Istanbul stock exchange; the former presidential adviser credited with devising Erdoğan's "Turkish century" election slogan; a former ambassador to the OECD; a former central bank deputy governor; and the former chief executive and deputy chief executive of Türkiye Sigorta, Turkey's largest non-life insurer, controlled by a sovereign wealth fund chaired by Erdoğan.
The investigations encompass allegations ranging from bribery and market manipulation to abuse of office and involvement in a criminal organisation. Some suspects have denied wrongdoing, while others have made no public response to the allegations against them. Other senior officials have lost their positions.
Two successive chiefs of Turkey's capital markets regulator, the SPK, have lost their jobs, one citing ill health, and a deputy finance minister has retired following the arrest of his son-in-law. Closest to the top of the political pile is the AKP's deputy chair, Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya, who has resigned.
A furious Erdoğan has said the crisis is being handled “with a surgeon’s precision”. But party cadres and allies have been shaken to the core.
The funds crisis is “not a malfunction of the system. Nor, obviously, is it a case of a few bad apples. This is how the system actually works,” says Wolfango Piccoli, a longtime Turkey watcher and head of geopolitical risk at Consello, an advisory group. “It’s a story of institutional degradation, of regulatory bodies that have slowly been hollowed out.”
Alican Mordalga is one of the hundreds of thousands of Turks who now rue putting their life savings, in his case some TL6mn (\$120,000), into one of the Fonzi funds. Like many others, he had seen the glossy promotional materials put about by personalities such as Emre Tezmen, the 53-year-old founder of Tera Group whose brokerage and investment funds lie at the centre of the scandal. “The funds were regulated . . . they weren’t some underground operations. So, I trusted them on that basis, just as people do in other
countries," Mordalga says. "I don't think anyone imagined something like this could happen."
Tezmen, son of a former politician who chaired Turkish Airlines in the 1990s, founded Tera in 2005 and built it into a sprawling financial group. The rewards that his brokerage dangled to prospective investors were extraordinary. Corporate presentations boasted that its main fund, TLY, returned 4,233 per cent in 2025 against just 13 per cent for the Istanbul stock market.
The Tera operations that investigators are now examining bear an uncomfortable resemblance to the “pump and dump” schemes of financial history, such as Wall Street’s notorious “pool operators” of the roaring 1920s.
In essence, Fonzi funds built up concentrated positions in related companies, bidding up their share prices and flattering the funds' own net asset values. Spectacular returns attracted new investors, providing fresh money for the funds to buy the same or related stocks.
The fortunes of Ōzata Denizcilik, a shipbuilding company, illustrate the mechanics. When it floated in 2024, with a market capitalisation of roughly \$200mn, less than a fifth of its shares were publicly traded. In April, Tera funds began accumulating Ōzata stock at around TL281. By late August, the funds had bought almost 96 per cent of Ōzata's available shares, squeezing its stock price up until it reached a peak of almost TL5,000 in mid-September — a 1,600 per cent return in five months.
The SPK, Turkey's capital markets regulator, has since filed criminal complaints against 11 people, including Tezmen, over suspected manipulation of Özata shares. Tezmen, now remanded in custody, denies wrongdoing.
That segments of the Turkish market had seemingly gone crazy was no secret. Turkey's Financial Stability Committee, which includes finance minister Mehmet Şimşek and the central bank chief, discussed the problem last December. Even then, according to a statement later issued by the SPK, the committee was concerned that “certain portfolio management companies . . . were causing price movements . . . that could not be explained by economic reality”.
Some warnings were more explicit still. Ramazan Başak, a former deputy head of Turkey's financial crimes agency Masak, says he repeatedly alerted the authorities to suspicious transactions but was ignored. Başak was detained in April on suspicion of spreading “misleading information” after he questioned some of Tera's astronomical returns. He was subsequently released and denies wrongdoing.
In June, index provider MSCI warned that “co-ordinated trading behaviour” might be distorting stock market prices. Savvy Turkish investors watched it happening in plain sight.
The bubble burst in late August, after a change in free-float regulations governing shares threw the cycle of wealth creation into sudden reverse. On September 15, investment manager Pusula Portföy said some of its funds could not meet investor redemption requests. The alarm quickly spread. Other investors rushed to sell, there was a full-blown “funds run” and the market tanked.
“No Ponzi dies of natural causes. Either the regulators pull the trigger or investors do. In our case, it was the investors,” says Kerim Rota, an economist who has closely followed the Fonzi crisis. As an indication of how far some share prices have fallen, Özata, the shipbuilder, now trades at TL170 – a 98 per cent fall from its peak.
In an extraordinarily well-timed bet, Kaya, the deputy AKP chair who has since resigned, and her husband, sold their 400,000 Ōzata shares before the crash. Kaya says she has since voluntarily returned more than TL2bn — about \$40mn — in gains from share trading and denies receiving inside information or committing any wrongdoing.
Three Özata directors, including its chair, have been remanded in custody as part of the broader Fonzi investigation into market manipulation. The company has said such moves do not constitute guilt and that it is ready to challenge the detentions in the courts.
Turkish authorities now have to confront how to best clean up the mess. On September 17, the day after the market rout, the Financial Stability Committee responded with a co-ordinated series of emergency measures that included a freeze on trading, the liquidation of 131 funds with \$20bn of assets between them, and an increase in lira liquidity by the central bank to limit forced selling.
“We have placed the problematic area under quarantine,” said finance minister Şimşek, adding that it represented just 10 per cent of Turkey's investment fund sector and was not a systemic threat. Crucially, there had been no rush into dollars by worried investors, he said. The exchange rate was stable.


But as the affair has unfolded, two central questions remain so far unanswered. Why did the authorities, who knew about the apparent share price manipulation, allow the bubble to inflate for so long? And if there was collusion, how high up the system did it go?
As consumer confidence collapsed, dropping 8 per cent in October alone, a private poll reportedly delivered to Erdoğan suggested that the AKP's popularity had dropped by 6 per cent in just one month, according to former AKP lawmaker Şamil Tayyar.
The next presidential election must take place by 2028. It is widely assumed that Erdoğan, 72, will find a way to run again. But a constitutional bar on a third presidential term has led to speculation about who might eventually govern Turkey instead. Aydın Ünal, an Erdoğan loyalist and former presidential speechwriter, has warned darkly that the scandal may be a “trap” against Erdoğan, set by rival factions “from within”.
Independent journalists have meanwhile faced growing pressure. On October 14, police raided Halk TV, one of Turkey's most-watched news channels, citing a separate corruption investigation. A state-appointed trustee was subsequently installed to run the channel, which had reported extensively on the Fonzi scandal. "Only dictators raid television stations at dawn and appoint trustees," opposition leader Özgür Özel, who has called the Fonzi scandal the "theft of the century", said after the Halk TV intervention. "While the public demands accountability for the fund scandal . . . they do this."
Fraud and speculative bubbles are as old as finance itself. The South Sea Bub-
Nearly half a million retail investors who were drawn to funds with visions of 1,000 per cent returns risk losing their savings. President Erdoğan, above, says the crisis is being handled 'with a surgeon's precision' Adem Altan/AFP/Getty Images/Moe Zoyari/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect
'One of the common patterns of great bubbles is that they take place with . . . support from the ruling class'
ble of 1720, among the most notorious Ponzi schemes in history, burst only months after Britain's parliament passed the so-called Bubble Act, supposedly an initiative to rein in speculative excess. "The original meaning of the word bubble is fraud," says Edward Chancellor, author of Devil Take the Hindmost, a history of financial speculation. "Furthermore, one of the common patterns of great bubbles is that they take place with a degree of support from the governing class. When they pop, there is always political blowback and retribution."
That appears to be true of Turkey too. Erdoğan has sworn that heads will roll. "Those who obtained illicit and exorbitant gains" will be made to answer before the courts, he glowered at an AKP meeting on October 21. "We do not protect those who wrong our people." True to his word, more than 400 people face judicial proceedings, and there have been over 100 arrests so far. A state audit of what happened is due to be delivered to Erdoğan around year-end.
The government has arranged payments of up to TL1mn to each aggrieved investor per fund and established a “repentance account” into which those who made extraordinary gains can voluntarily return their profits. Critics say that system is untransparent and could allow both culprits and the government to sweep the issue under the carpet. “It is the political playbook that the AKP has always used in the past. Move fast, throw some people under the bus, set up an investigation, and then proclaim that the rule of law works,” says Piccoli.
The economic fallout of the scandal may be harder to brush aside. Turkey's economy, struggling with inflation around 30 per cent, needs capital – just when higher global interest rates risk making capital scarcer. But over the past two months the stock market has fallen by around a third, shedding some \$100bn of value.
The crisis may yet have a silver lining. A thorough regulatory clean-up could restore confidence and revive oft-touted plans to make Istanbul an international financial centre. Still, that is cold comfort for the almost half a million Turks and their families directly affected by the Fonzi scandal. “I don’t know if I can ever believe in the Turkish stock market again,” says Mordalga, whose disenchantment speaks to the crisis’s biggest casualty: trust.
That very issue was raised 10 months ago in parliament by the opposition lawmaker, who had asked a second pointed question. "If the authorities had this information, why did they not act in time?" Ayyüce Türkeş Taş inquired. "Isn't that complicity – covering up a crime?"
Additional reporting by Serra Yedikardes
Özata shares soared as Tera funds amassed almost all its tradable stock
Lira per share ('000)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2026 Source: LSEG

FINANCIAL TIMES
'Without fear and without favour'
ft.com/opinion
Credit winter has not come quite yet for the AI investment boom – but it is certainly getting colder out there as the leaves fall. Alphabet, Meta and Oracle returned to debt markets this week to sell tens of billions of dollars of additional bonds for access to chips and data centres, adding to a surge in such borrowing this year already estimated at about half a trillion dollars. The hyperscalers are, though, paying notably more than just a few months ago, when it seemed that growth in AI spending to fill the need for compute still had far to go.
On Monday, Oracle sold \$10bn in bonds with coupons of 7 to more than 8.5 per cent, up from 5 to 7 per cent in an issue in February – though shareholders also took a hit, with a concurrent \$10bn share sale. Alphabet, Google's parent, issued 19-year euro-denominated bonds with a coupon of over 5.2 per cent as part of a €6bn sale this week, up from 4.5 per cent for selling debt of the same maturity and currency in May – and at a higher spread over core rates.
Government and corporate borrowers have fretted this year about being “crowded out” by supersized AI bonds offering juicier yields while interest rates have risen. But even as investors will watch the US midterm results for signs that Democratic gains might slow down data centre construction, something is changing in credit markets’ capacity to keep absorbing AI risk.
While these may not sound like large moves in borrowing costs, they add up in dollar terms given the sheer size of issuance that is undergirding investment plans. They raise pressure on the rates of return that will be required from AI spending and are striking for companies that mostly still have top credit ratings and core businesses throwing off cash. This is also reflected in investors paying up to hedge their debt exposure.
The cost to insure Alphabet's dollar debt against a default in the next five years has risen to just under 1 per cent of principal, about the same as for Mexico, a government rated at the lowest levels of investment grade. Mark Zuckerberg has great hopes for Muse, Meta's new personal AI agent. In case he is wrong, investors are now pricing credit default swaps on the creator of the cutesy but compute-hogging agent at 1.2 per cent, in line with junk-rated South Africa.
It would be easier to brush off the market's cooling on AI borrowers if the competition for capital they have unleashed, and the prolongation of higher interest rates and energy prices this year, were not exposing credit cracks elsewhere. Funds that flew high betting on the riskiest layers of European corporate debt in particular have come down with a bump. Yields on these bonds have blown out to double
The higher yields on hyperscaler bonds raise pressure on the rates of return that will be required from tech spending
digits, more than higher-rated junk. Many of the borrowers are in struggling industries such as broadband.
There is a lesson here for bondholders sizing up AI debts that, even if they have far higher credit ratings, they are ultimately bets on who will be on the hook for the complex construction costs of data centres. Some parts of this market are still growing quickly, for example alternative asset managers extending loans secured against assets such as chips, but other creditors will be looking for protection from runaway spending.
Oracle, which was the first of the hyperscalers to start spending more than it generated in cash flow, signalled that \$20bn will be the limit for new money it will raise from capital markets until 2030. Even if that may be a hard resolution to keep, it is significant that this kind of promise is coming into fashion. Investors have braced in case the AI trade implodes with a stock market bang. Instead it might start with a credit market whimper.
Opinion Environment
Andy Carter

Pilita Clark

W hen this year's annual UN climate conference, COP31, kicks off next week in the Turkish city of
Antalya, brace yourself for a lot of talk about a topic that is not nearly as dull as it sounds: electricity.
The summit's hosts want governments to back a new goal to raise electricity's share of final energy demand from just over 20 per cent today to 35 per cent by 2035. In other words, they want more cars to run on batteries instead of petrol, and more homes to be heated with electric heat pumps, not gas boilers.
The target is only voluntary but it's a good idea, for the climate and for our wallets. About 80 per cent of the global population lives in countries that are net importers of fossil fuels. Those fuels can get expensive
in a crisis, as this year's war in Iran has shown.
But even without such turmoil, the International Energy Agency reckons import bills could fall by more than \$400bn a year by 2035 if those countries boosted their electrification rates. Much upfront investment would be needed but electric tech's lower operating costs mean the pay-off should be lower energy bills across the world by 2035.
Electricity can also cut emissions, especially if it comes from renewables. As it happens, wind and solar are surging so much that renewables last year narrowly overtook coal's 33 per cent share of global power generation for what the Ember energy think-tank says is the first time in a century.
So the COP31 electrification goal should be good news for the green energy transition.
But hang on, you may be thinking. Isn't that transition a pipe dream? Hasn't the share of fossil fuels in the global primary energy mix barely budged, from 85 per cent in 1990 to about 80 per cent today? And doesn't that mean that all that new green power is more of an addition than a transition, which is proving harder than thought?
This is pretty much what the energy analyst Daniel Yergin wrote in Foreign
Affairs last year, and what other prominent experts have argued for years, along with oil executives.
They are not entirely wrong. Fossil fuels do still dominate the global energy system, but not in the way you might think. And replacing them may not be nearly as daunting a challenge for governments as that persistent 80 per cent-plus share of primary energy suggests.
The clue is in the word “primary”. Primary energy refers to the total energy content of coal, oil or other resources before it gets converted into the so-called “final energy” we get when we buy electricity or fill up at a petrol station. Final energy is different again from the “useful energy” we actually use when we turn on a light or drive a car.
Because burning fuels to generate power, drive vehicles and heat buildings wastes much of those fuels' energy as heat, about two-thirds of the primary energy that goes into the global system is lost before it does anything useful.
A growing number of energy analysts point out that the energy transition does not require all that waste energy to be replaced, joule for joule, with renewable energy. Believing otherwise is what Canadian chemical engineer Paul Martin has called the “primary energy fallacy”.
Or as the Oxford professor Jan Rosenow told me, “we don’t need to replace waste”. Rosenow is the lead author of a forthcoming study that attempts to quantify the scale of the primary energy fallacy by modelling a highly electrified global economy running on renewable power. It suggests we could get exactly the same amount of useful energy we have today with about half as much primary energy.
This is mainly because generating electricity from the wind and sun avoids the heat lost in fossil fuel power stations, and electric technologies are far more efficient.
Most of the fuel put into a conventional car, for example, ends up as waste heat instead of moving the car, making internal combustion engine vehicles less efficient than electric ones.
Clean energy expert Michael Liebreich, founder of what is now the Bloomberg New Energy Finance research group, says measuring our economy's energy use in primary energy units "is like measuring nutrition by how many acres are used in agriculture". It also inflates the importance of fossil fuels.
Those fuels grew to dominance last century because they were more efficient than energy sources like wood or horse muscles. It's time they made way for a new generation of less wasteful, and less costly, replacements.
pilita.clark@ft.com
Letters
Must we endure yet another account of Ireland's supposedly precarious economic miracle? Jude Webber's Big Read article "Why rich Ireland still feels poor" (November 2) rehearses the familiar litany: unaffordable housing, inadequate infrastructure, multinational dependence, volatile corporation tax and the ever-present prospect that Ireland's extraordinary prosperity might suddenly evaporate. All familiar problems. But where is the context?
Housing affordability and infrastructure delivery are problems across the developed world. These are serious challenges, but their existence
Your editorial “The limits of hedging the AI boom” (The FT View, October 28) considers how investors can protect their portfolios from an AI downturn. Much of the money driving the boom is going into chips, data centres and power, so the returns on this infrastructure matter to its suppliers and lenders as well as its owners. But those returns can come under pressure even if demand for AI keeps growing: new technology can make existing equipment less competitive before it has paid for itself.
New generations of equipment can make computing cheaper. That is good news for customers. For a company that borrowed to buy its equipment, it can put returns under pressure. Competition may force it to cut prices, while debt repayments, lease payments and other contractual commitments remain. Higher usage and greater efficiency may offset this pressure, but neither can be taken for granted.
Companies are already revising their estimates of how long equipment will remain useful. Amazon announced in January 2025 it would shorten the useful life assumed in its accounts for some servers and networking equipment from six years to five. It explicitly linked this change to faster technological development, particularly in AI and machine learning.
Cash reserves give a company time to adapt, but do not by themselves ensure that earlier investments will pay off. A sector can grow while some of its companies become less profitable.
Shareholders should therefore ask how long the equipment will take to pay for itself, whether it can still earn enough if computing prices fall, and which financial commitments the company can change as conditions evolve. An investor can be right about the future of a technology and still overestimate the returns on the equipment bought today. Zezag Kaimova Abu Dhabi, UAE
Simon Mundy is right to warn about looming copper shortages (Moral Money, October 23). However, not only do credible solutions exist, if harnessed correctly they can fast-track progress towards a circular economy.
Copper is well suited to circularity, which focuses less on increasing production and more on reducing demand and minimising waste. The metal can be recycled repeatedly without losing its essential properties. Industry estimates suggest that two-thirds of the copper produced over the
For more than two generations, Ireland has attracted, retained, lost and replaced successive waves of international investment. Clothing, electronics, computers, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and digital technologies have come, changed and sometimes gone. Yet the economy has continued to attract new industries, technologies and enterprises. Ireland attracted 78 first-time investors in 2025 alone.
tells us remarkably little about the sustainability of Ireland's economic model.
The familiar warnings about what would happen if today's major
If you are not satisfied with the FT's response to your complaint, you can appeal to the FT Editorial Complaints Commissioner: complaints.commissioner@ft.com
BANX

"I PRETENDED TRUMP WAS ON THE BALLOT"
past century remains in productive use. In the US, copper recycled from post-industrial scrap accounted for roughly 40 per cent of apparent consumption (around 920,000 tonnes out of the 2.2mn tonnes) in 2025.
This contribution can be increased and replicated elsewhere. As European telephone networks switch to fibre, redundant copper cables become a strategic resource.
BT alone expects to recover up to 200,000 tonnes from its legacy network through the 2030s. Planned network retirements offer an opportunity to organise recovery before valuable infrastructure is abandoned underground.
Yet recycling cannot close the projected supply gap alone. We must also review specifications that use copper by default. Reducing unnecessary pipe lengths, reviewing oversized plumbing systems and improving electrical layouts can cut material requirements without compromising performance and safety.
The UK's “Vision 2035: Critical Minerals Strategy” report recognises copper's strategic importance, yet the government's “circular economy growth plan” remains unpublished. Ministers should urgently connect the two, working with the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to establish a coherent approach.
Failure to do so will not be cheap and risks supporting criminal recycling networks. Thieves are already targeting power cables, telecommunications and renewable energy installations, costing the UK economy an estimated £500mn annually. By moving quickly and decisively governments can accelerate progress towards a new kind of circular resource security, not only for copper but also for other critical raw materials.
Patrick Schroeder
Senior Research Fellow, Chatham House, London SW1, UK
investors disappeared generally neglect to ask what might replace them. They highlight the possible disappearance of particular companies and ignore Ireland's repeatedly demonstrated capacity to attract their successors. Renewal is as important as attraction and retention.
Of course corporation tax concentration presents risks. Subtracting potentially volatile revenues from future budgets is a useful stress test, but not a complete account of a dynamic economy.
Ireland's genuine difficulty may be that its ability to attract productive investment and people has outstripped
Aliya Shibli's report that the number of founders choosing to sell, not scale, is at an eight-year high (FT Money, October 24) will not surprise those of us who back smaller companies.
Sixty per cent of private sector employees, around 17mn people, work in small and medium-sized enterprises in the UK, defined as businesses with fewer than 250 employees. Yet less than one in five is based in London.
At Mercia Asset Management, we invest around £250mn a year into SMEs across the UK through venture capital, development capital and property finance, from our 11 offices nationwide.
We share Prime Minister Andy Burnham's optimism about UK businesses, and it was pleasing to see him engaging so openly with entrepreneurs and investors when I met him recently. I thanked him for his positive attitude and suggested a light-hearted pact: let's create fewer SMEs in the regions, not more.
The point was deliberately provocative. Too many promising British businesses outside London remain small because they struggle to access the capital needed to scale beyond 250 employees. And when they do achieve scale, they are too often bought by overseas acquirers.
The prime minister supported the aim of creating fewer SMEs by empowering them to grow larger.
Scale-up capital is in the eye of the beholder. In the UK's regions, it often means investments of £5mn to £40mn, not £100mn to £500mn. A handful of London success stories should not distract us from the scale of the opportunity elsewhere.
Some relatively modest interventions could rapidly change the landscape and support “good growth in every postcode”. This might comprise regionally targeted scale-up funds backed by government and institutional capital; subsequent crossover funding to prepare companies for an Aim listing; and a functioning Aim market that helps retain the next generation of valuable British businesses.
The government could strengthen Aim by removing restrictions that limit the participation of Venture Capital Trusts in the open market and by encouraging greater institutional investment in Aim small caps.
Do those things, and more regional businesses should be able to scale and remain in the UK. And, by definition, we might finally start creating fewer SMEs, because more of them have grown into larger British businesses. Mark Payton CEO, Mercia Asset Management, Birmingham, UK
Email: letters.editor@ft.com
Include daytime telephone number and full address Corrections: corrections@ft.com
its ability to accommodate them. That is a challenge to our systems of planning, infrastructure delivery and public administration, not proof that the economic model has failed.
Perhaps it is time to retire the mythical creature of Ireland's fluke economy. There is another mythical creature that offers a much better explanation: the Phoenix.
Ireland's economic strength has never depended on keeping every industry alive. It lies in its repeated ability to renew and replace them.
Conor Skehan
Former Chair of the Housing Agency, Malahide, County Dublin, Ireland
Jemima Kelly is a little unfair in airily dismissing the journalist and broadcaster Tim Stanley's warning that the UK is on the brink of civil war (“The right’s obsession with ‘civil war’ in Britain”, Opinion, October 26).
Stanley, and some of the others who take to print and the internet with similar views, are what Crane Brinton, in his 1938 classic The Anatomy of Revolution, describes as “professional seers and timid conservatives” performing “one of the great functions of the intellectuals in Western society”, [namely] “to shake ordinary mortals out of their unthinking optimism, and Cassandra has perhaps as much claim as Plato to be founder of a great academic tradition.”
Before Kelly (and we) take too much comfort from Brinton's ensuing caveat ("Cassandra's successors have not quite achieved her unhappy infallibility"), a glance at the harbingers of revolution that Brinton induces from his groundbreaking study – which include government deficits, more than the usual number of complaints over taxation, governmental favouring of one set of economic interests over another, the intensification of social antagonisms, the closing of career opportunities to the talented, and the separation of economic power from political power and social distinction – ought to give us at least some pause for thought.
Charles Mercey
Tellisford, Somerset, UK
A word for your photo editors. The report “Toyota poised to unleash its humanoid robots” (Report, November 2), includes a picture in which, according to the caption in the print version of the FT, “a Toyota robot plays basketball”. This is pure anthropomorphism, and evidence of a disturbing trend of attributing human qualities to machines.
Do we need reminding that robots cannot play? Play is not simply a property of what something does (in this case, a robot throws a ball into a basket). As the psychoanalyst DW Winnicott pointed out in his 1971 book Playing and Reality, play is a relationship between subjective and objective reality. Robots may be said to simulate play, but no more than that.
Let's keep the language of subjective experience (including intelligence, but it's probably too late for that) out of our descriptions and discussions of what robots – and AI in general – are all about.
Paul Axelrod
San Francisco, CA, US
Martin Wolf Economics
The longer the investment surge continues, the bigger the negative impact is likely to be when it ends

rtificial intelligence has many – mostly far from fully understood – implications for humanity. Among these is something concrete and current: it has launched a huge surge in spending on physical capital, to meet the demand for huge data centres. Indeed, according to a fascinating paper, “Financing the AI Buildout” by Stijn van Nieuwerburgh of the Columbia Business School, spending in the US will average 3.6 per cent of GDP from 2025 to 2032 (inclusive). This would be larger than the average of 2.2 per cent of GDP spent on railways between 1870 and 1890, let alone the 1.1 per cent spent on highways from 1956 to 1973. In fact, it would be the biggest sector-specific investment boom of all.
Some of those earlier transformations were sustained over far longer periods. But this fact makes the AI build-out even more concentrated and so, quite possibly, even more disruptive. Moreover, as van Nieuwerburgh explains, financing the boom is now creating some classic risks, despite the strength of the huge companies (mainly Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Oracle) driving the huge surge in spending.
Moreover, these risks are also macroeconomic. Booms can easily turn into busts, as stock market valuations collapse, companies go bankrupt, lenders lose money and planned investment vanishes. Will this time be different? Ultimately, that depends on the profitability of the new businesses and, in this case, hopes are very high indeed.
As the paper points out, aggregate capital expenditures by the companies listed above rose from \$97bn in 2020, to \$416bn in 2025 and a forecast of \$801bn in 2026. In 2020, the surplus of operating cash flow of these companies over capital spending was \$155bn. In 2025, they still had a cash flow surplus of more than \$187bn. But over these years, the ratio of capital spending to operating cash flows rose from 38 per cent in 2020 to nearly 69 per cent in 2025. Then, in 2026, according to the companies' forecasts, capital spending will exceed cash flow by \$93bn and the ratio of spending to cash flow will hit 113 per cent. Alphabet and Microsoft will still spend a little less than their cash flow. But Oracle's spending will be 138 per cent above it, Amazon's 36 per cent above it and Meta's closet to it.

As a result, ever more complex financial arrangements are being made. Thus, not for the first time, an investment boom is causing an explosion in leverage. While the hyperscalers' direct investment is still important, "the marginal financing model is shifting. Specialized data center developers, REITs, infrastructure funds, and private equity investors increasingly build or acquire facilities and lease capacity to hyperscalers and other large users."
The result, according to the paper, is an increasingly complex and non-transparent financial structure. In particular, it notes, “publicly rated debt represents only a relatively small share of the datacenter financing; much larger volumes are provided through syndicated bank loans and private-credit facilities, for which little information is publicly available."


The AI buildout is forecast to be the biggest in US history
Selected US capital expenditure booms (% of GDP)


Source: Van Nieuwerburgh — 'Financing the AI Buildout' (Brookings, 2026)
Martin Wolf
In sum, “the central issue is not simply that AI infrastructure is exposed to technological and operating risks, but that the sector’s financing structure can transmit and amplify those risks.” This is historically familiar behaviour. Risks for data centre owners include: concentration in the tenants and also in sources of final demand; technological obsolescence and so the need to scrap and replace relatively quickly; and political and operational difficulties involved in making the investments work. Moreover
ver, van Nieuwerburgh adds, “Chip designers, cloud providers, data center operators, and infrastructure investors increasingly depend on one another through long-term contracts, strategic investments, and financing arrangements.” This creates fragility.
These are not just issues for the AI sector itself. The investment boom is big enough to have large macroeconomic implications. A paper from the Federal Reserve suggested that spending on computer hardware, software and data centres contributed more than a percentage point to annualised quarter-over-quarter US GDP growth in the first quarter of this year, partially offset by a half a percentage point of GDP increase in net imports in those categories. Both the IMF's World Economic Outlook and a recent Substack from Matt Klein shed light on the international spillovers of the global AI boom, especially on to Taiwanese and South Korean products.
A crucial question, however, is how far the AI mania has infected the stock market, above all in the US. Here some of the vulnerabilities are evident. First, the Magnificent Seven (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla) have, until recently, indeed been pulling the US stock market ever higher. Second, the market is at valuations rarely seen before, with a cyclically adjusted real earnings yield of 2.5 per cent, which is only fractionally above the current real interest rate. This only makes sense if earnings from stocks are about to grow far faster than ever before. In the past, however, whenever earnings have been this low relative to stock prices, the latter have crashed. Is this AI-driven boom, with all its unavoidable uncertainties about future profitability, returns on the huge and rapidly growing investment, and now the elaborate financial engineering, going to be any different?
The longer the investment boom and the associated financial engineering continue, the bigger the negative economic impact is likely to be when it ends. This does not mean that AI itself will fail to be the transformative technology it seems to be, though only a species that adores playing Russian roulette would tolerate a business (Anthropic) whose prospectus says it could create “catastrophic or existential risks to humanity”. New technologies have often triggered stock market manias and investment booms that end in busts. Recent market tremors suggest this could even be happening to AI now. A return to reality will come when it will come. The readiness is all.
martin.wolf@ft.com
SOCIETY
Adam Tooze


merican berserk", "speedball capitalism" – thanks to the malign coincidence of Donald Trump and AI hyperscaling we are
living through a conjuncture that defies conventional thinking and challenges us to coin new terms. We need new conceptions that allow us to grasp both the dynamism of America's political economy and its transgressive character.
For our current situation, the Manhattan Project is far too quaint to serve as a useful reference point. The dot.com bubble of the 1990s was an altogether sunnier time. In terms of sheer spending, even the epic railway booms of the late 19th century are being eclipsed. As the full scale of the AI boom becomes clear, these familiar reference points all fall short.
What if we turn to the darker moments of modern history? The most dramatic and violent programmes of modernisation in the 20th century were state-led – Stalinist industrialisation, for instance. Our moment is one in which the US government plays a supportive role.
But private business is in charge. So perhaps the Industrial Revolution is the obvious precursor. Although this is closer to the mark, the accompanying ideology of the Industrial Revolution was classical liberalism — not so today.
As you work your way down the list of possible histories to reference, before long you arrive at a jaw-dropping conclusion. If you are looking for moments of capitalist resource mobilisation that transformed societies and threatened to deliver nothing short of the end of the world for those who stood in their way, it is empire and colonialism
that we have to consider, and chattel slavery in particular.
The point, of course, is not to suggest any moral equivalence between our current moment and the horror of the Atlantic slave trade. But what histories of slave societies and the slave trade remind us of is how little room there is for complacency with regard to the guardrails that supposedly constrain the reasonable or the possible in modern society.
The latest histories to perform this service are the Register of British Slave Traders and William Pettigrew's book of the same name. They show us how the uprooting and enslaving of over 12mn African people involved financial innovation and new logistical systems; state power not just mobilised in support of the trade but reinvented around it; cultural production and the media touting a new national myth of innovation and empowerment; economic argument energised by the question of licensed monopoly or free trade, in enslaved people.
As Pettigrew shows us, Atlantic slavery sucked in a substantial part of the British elite. Britons who celebrated their own freedom hitched their national development to the enslaving of others. If Britain, in its rise from second-tier European player to global hegemon, pioneered a new form of Anglo-globalisation, then a modernised slave supply chain was among its first projects.
The very idea of a project as a globe-spanning “venture” was a product of this early modern period. The vision of remaking the future by collective corporate mobilisation, the obsession that echoes down to 21st-century Silicon Valley, took root in Britain in the Tudor and Stuart age. The aim was profit. But the logic was not that of careful maximisation of rate of return. As today, speculation was fundamental to the spirit of venture capital.
When a businessperson tells you they are embarked on a vastly lucrative project that will change the future of humanity, but which comes with a risk of ending the world as we know it, take them at their word.
The South Sea Bubble of 1720 is commonly remembered as the world's first Ponzi scheme. But in focusing on the financial aspects, we obscure its real underpinnings. The South Sea Company did not deal in tulips. It was a gigantic human-trafficking operation, licensed by a monopoly contract with the Spanish Crown to supply tens of thousands of enslaved Africans to Spanish plantations.
If you truly want reference points from the past to enhance your situational awareness of the present, don't flinch from what histories of slavery have to tell us. There is nothing in the combination of finance, enterprise, unfettered technological innovation, radical modernist thinking about the category of the human and state power that should reassure us.


Milan's Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II is a haunt of luxury shoppers — Dreamstime
f you are a very wealthy, globally mobile person wondering where to pitch your tent, you are probably keenly focused on two
big – and conceptually opposed – fiscal trends.
On the one hand, there's California and its ilk, concerned by the societal impacts of rising inequality and attempting to impose wealth taxes. On the other, there are the likes of Greece, keen to attract the super-rich – including UK fund manager Chris Rokos – with sweet deals, in the hope that wealth will trickle down.
And then there's Italy, which wants to do both, and thus risks achieving neither. The country has successfully marketed itself as a tax haven for wealthy individuals, including those fleeing London following the scrapping of non-dom rules. Now, however, it is mulling the imposition of an “exit tax” on rich emigrants.
Under the proposed rules sketched out in Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's draft budget law, current residents with more than €800,000 of equity or debt investments worldwide would, should they ever tire of La Dolce Vita, be slapped with a 26 per cent capital gains tax, whether they sell their assets or not.
This is not totally unprecedented. Alongside the US, a number of European countries – including Germany, France and Spain – levy exit taxes on rich individuals. And it removes the incentive to move to a lower-tax jurisdiction simply to sell amassed gains, which is sensible enough.
But Italy is casting the net unusually wide. The €800,000 threshold, which applies to a resident's gross assets rather than deducting borrowings or mortgages, means the tax would enmesh a lot of senior professionals. Spain's version, by contrast, applies to those with over €4mn in assets.
Meloni's plan has other unappealing quirks. Some taxpayers will have to sell assets they might otherwise have held longer, in order to pay their bill. And
NatWest is finding some pandemic-era habits hard to shake. Staff complained last month when the UK bank tried to make them spend more time in the office. And while customers may have cooled on some lockdown pursuits — pickling vegetables and baking sourdough bread, say — some financial habits from that era have stuck.
Saving money, for example. A rising household savings ratio suggests British consumers are conserving more income, and giving more thought to where they stick the extra cash. The amount being put aside for a rainy day averaged almost 9 per cent of earnings per quarter in the past three years, official data shows, compared with 5.5 per cent in the years 2017 to 2019.
Separate figures from the Bank of England show deposits in tax-efficient Isas and fixed-term savings accounts surged 70 per cent since the start of 2022, while money in zero-interest accounts rose just 15 per cent.
Borrowing behaviours are also shifting. Credit card debt is at a record high, but the proportion that racks up interest is close to a record low as more people pay off their full balance each month. Executives say mortgagors, likewise, have become more attentive and quick to switch deals when their fixed terms are close to expiring.
This is bad news for banks, which benefit from customer inertia. It adds to the pressure on profitability for large lenders such as NatWest, Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC, already grappling with increased competition for deposits from the likes of JPMorgan's Chase UK at one end and fintechs such as Monzo on the other. NatWest shares fell almost 9 per cent last week when analysts realised its profit margin forecasts were too optimistic.
There is a bright side. Better money management means richer customers. The borrower who routinely pays down their credit card balance is less likely to default if they lose their job, and the customer who saves a little more may gain enough for a house deposit, and become a mortgage customer.
Most of the big banks are skating where the puck is going with efforts to reduce their reliance on net interest margin and grow in areas such as wealth management, which benefits from having wealthier customers.


That's harder work than sucking up cash into interest-free current accounts, but that business model was likely to come under threat in the next few years. AI assistants could soon allow the laziest customer to behave like a follower of the savings best-buy tables. In which case, executives should be grateful for an early glimpse into the future. Better to adapt now than be forgotten like a sourdough starter.
Coming down the runway for Europe's travellers: fewer flights at higher prices. Airlines are trying to contain the damage wrought on their profit by persistently high fuel prices. While many are talking about cost cuts, passengers will share the burden too.
Budget airlines face the toughest task. Low-cost champion Ryanair on Monday outlined potential trims it hopes will ease the impact of a €2bn rise in its fuel bill in its next financial year.
Full-service carriers aren't immune, though. Lufthansa, busy integrating Italian carrier ITA as well as taking on a large minority holding in Portugal's TAP, yesterday lowered the high end of its full-year profit forecast. Its fuel costs have risen a fifth, even with financial hedges in place.
John Gapper London Gateway's rise shows if you build it, they will come BUSINESS INSIGHT
As well as high oil prices, airlines are also suffering from a reduction in refining capacity from the Middle East on top of that already lost from sanctions on Russia. Jet fuel in the region has traded above \$1,200 a tonne for the past three months compared with about \$800 before the US attacked Iran in February, making it costly to hedge next year's needs — and risky, should prices fall.
The margin squeeze will be worse for budget airlines, which start out with less room to cut costs. Fuel will soak up 44 per cent of Ryanair's revenue next year, according to analysts polled by Visible Alpha, up from 37 per cent this year. For British Airways owner IAG and for Lufthansa, on the other hand, fuel is expected to be between a quarter and a fifth, unchanged from this year.
Nor can low-cost carriers rely on wealthier premium travellers, who seem strangely tolerant of rising prices; Lufthansa's premium services helped it to an 8 per cent rise in revenue. Capacity cuts are an obvious place to hunker down. But if fuel prices stay roughly where they are, Ryanair would need a 16 per cent jump in revenue next year to offset its extra costs fully, Barclays analysts estimate.
That's a painful rise for its customers when the Irish airline's current average one-way fare is €56. Prices at the budget end have recently been increasing by "mid single digits" according to Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary, who expects them to rise much more as the industry heads into winter, literally and metaphorically. The only consolation is that budget passengers had it so good for so long.
1 Positive this skilled tradesperson is biased (7)
2 Firm about communist beliefs (5)
3 At home on sofa I enjoyed being able to carry on eating (9)
4 The wrong time of year unfortunately, so no radishes (4,2,6)
6 When visiting rellies, taking turn about remarkable Square (5)
7 Detailed twisted Christian harangue (9)
8 Motorsport director is given therapeutic toys (7)
11 Fodder one's gathered in for your old rat (7,5)
15 Dotty storyteller collects homework after a break (9)
17 Aged college dons close to retiring support singer (9)
18 Deer in bits OK, escaping horse and donkey (7)
20 Ultimately Famous Five are muddled in head, see (7)
22 Had to carry grain jar (5)
23 Senior ex-army man? (5)\*


Register now
banking.live.ft.com
WEDNESDAY 4 NOVEMBER 2026

How a \$20bn fraud burnt Turkey's investors BIG READ, PAGE 21
UK £3.70; Republic of Ireland €4.10
Will the AI boom differ from any other mania?
MARTIN WOLF, PAGE 23
---
Voters cast their midterms ballots yesterday in West Columbia, South Carolina. Millions of voters headed to the polls for congressional races – from Maine to Alaska, and Texas to Michigan – set to deliver a verdict on Donald Trump's second term.
The president's Republican Party was at risk of defeats in both chambers of Congress as voters soured on his handling of the economy, his war against Iran, his abrasive style and his family's enrichment while in office.
More than 59mn ballots had been cast before yesterday in postal votes, a figure suggesting turnout on the day would be high. Polls close from 6pm EST, with the first results expected soon after and continuing into the early hours as voting closed in the west. There were also 36 gubernatorial races and votes on policy ideas, such as a wealth tax in California. Trump's Israel pledge page 4

Sam Wolfe/Reuters
---
\- Chipmaker curbs cloud providers
ZIJING WU — HONG KONG
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
ELEANOR OLCOTT — LONDON
Nvidia has ordered its data centre partners to reduce their exposure to Chinese customers, further hampering China's ability to keep up with the US in the AI superpower race.
The world's largest chipmaker has told cloud computing clients they must sell at least 51 per cent of their services to non-Chinese companies, according to people with knowledge of the matter. No restrictions existed previously.
The instructions have been communicated verbally and conveyed by Nvidia's sales teams rather than spelt out in documents, the people said.
The move means Chinese tech companies face a new threat to their AI ambitions as Washington moves to restrict the access to advanced US chips they had through overseas cloud computing deals. Many Chinese groups had relied on such leases for advanced AI tasks, including model training.
The compliance rules apply to Nvidia's clients globally and not just data centres in Asia, two of the people said. They affect future contracts rather than existing leasing agreements.
"Longstanding US policy encourages
---
every cloud to build on American infrastructure and to win business everywhere they can," Nvidia said. "America's longstanding policy has always supported the build-out of American infrastructure worldwide, bringing prosperity, influence, and jobs home."
Nvidia imposed the requirement over the summer in an effort to reduce the criticism it receives regularly from US lawmakers and other critics of its approach to China, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The US is seeking to clamp down both on intermediaries that have helped create a thriving black market for Nvidia's chips in China, and on Chinese companies' access to advanced chips through overseas leasing deals.
Cloud providers have, however, struggled to comply with the curbs because it is “difficult to find enough non-Chinese clients outside the US”, said a Singapore-based group. “If strictly implemented, it will definitely hurt business.”
Nvidia's crackdown has also fuelled a severe shortage of advanced computing power for Chinese tech companies. A rack of Nvidia's B300 chips, which sells for about \$600,000, last month fetched Rmb18.5mn (\$2.8mn) in China because of their scarcity, according to a person with knowledge of the deal.
Nvidia had already more than halved the number of Asian customers authorised to buy its AI chips after it created a “white list” of groups that had passed tough compliance checks aimed at preventing the products from reaching China. That meant fewer Nvidia chips being smuggled into China, forcing more Chinese groups to pursue leasing deals with overseas cloud providers.
The US and China are by far the largest sources of demand for computing power, while Chinese tech groups have been the biggest clients for data centres in regions such as south-east Asia.
Nvidia's move has also prompted data centres outside the US to search desperately for clients that are not Chinese. They could be forced to shrink the scale of their operations if they cannot do so.
Nvidia shares have fallen more than 13 per cent in the past month but remain 7 per cent higher this year. The recent dip in the stock means Jensen Huang's group has been overtaken by Apple as the world's most valuable company.
FT View page 22
---
▶ Poundland owners face grilling from angry MPs
US distressed investor Gordon Brothers will be hauled before members within days to explain its role in the discount retailer's looming insolvency. One of the biggest high street failures puts 12,000 jobs at risk.— PAGE 12
▶ Push for leaders' meeting
Officials are discussing a possible meeting later this month between Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin when the three leaders attend the Apec summit in Shenzhen, China.— PAGE 4
▶ Binance lifts lid on heist
The crypto exchange has said the attackers who stole \$6.3bn last week set up fake job interviews to trick one of its software engineers into installing malicious code.
— PAGE 9; MARKETS INSIGHT, PAGE 14
▶ Lifetime pension offer
Private sector workers will be given the automatic right to a lifetime pension income under plans that unwind moves to give pensioners freedom over their money in retirement.— PAGE 2
▶ Bill backs green energy
An “energy independence bill” is to be presented to parliament that forces green energy groups to invest in communities hosting their projects, in a bid to rebuild support for net zero.— PAGE 2
▶ Apollo \$114bn AI splurge
The New York private capital group has poured premiums from its insurance clients into the AI boom at a frenzied pace, lending a record \$114bn in the third quarter.— PAGE 10; FT VIEW, PAGE 22
▶ Trump to cut Israel aid
The US president has said that Washington will stop providing military aid at the year's end. The US gives \$4bn annually to Israel in a 10-year agreement that is set to expire in 2028.— PAGE 4
Australia raises rates The central bank has increased interest rates to an 18-year high as it warned inflation remained above target in an economy grappling with joblessness and a house price collapse.—PAGE 8
---

---
Rio Tinto is joining the fight to stop one of Australia's most invasive species wreaking havoc on wildlife. The mining group is spending \$20mn working with scientists to forge a 40km by 400km 'kill zone' for the marauding cane toad, which was introduced a century ago to feast on a sugarcane-eating beetle but ended up devouring everything. By attacking biodiversity in the iron-rich Pilbara area, they would make Rio's mine applications harder and costlier. Toad invasion ▶ PAGE 10
LUCY FISHER AND JULIE STEINBERG
The Conservatives have turned to Lord David Cameron to rally supporters and boost fundraising, with the former prime minister wooing donors with top billing at party events.
Cameron, who took the Conservatives into power in the 2010 general election, has also been speaking regularly to party leader Kemi Badenoch, according to people familiar with the matter.
His return coincides with the Tories' overtaking Reform UK in the polls for the first time in almost two years, a milestone in the party's nascent recovery after the rout at the last election.
The Tories climbed to an average of 22.1 per cent, up from a low of 16 per cent last autumn, according to the FT's poll tracker, passing Reform on 21.9 per cent, for the first time in 22 months.
The party still lags behind Labour, which continues to enjoy stronger support under Andy Burnham, rising to 29.2 per cent in the FT's poll of polls.
Cameron had already been asked to assist Badenoch with Prime Minister's Questions, as reported by the FT this year, and has been credited in part for her improvement at the despatch box at the weekly Commons showdown.
He has now been calling existing and lapsed Tory donors to entice them back into the tent and to open their wallets.
"If an election is called soon, the Tories suffer from a very damaged brand but they need financial resources to stand any chance of being competitive," said a person familiar with matters.
Cameron is the star attraction at next month's Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Association event, for which tickets cost up to £345 a seat. Billing it as “a rare chance to hear [Cameron’s] reflections on leadership, Britain’s place in the world and the Conservative future”, the association website invites donations alongside bookings.
Cameron is also set to address the annual pre-Christmas lunch of centre-right think-tank Onward.
"I've noticed that David seems to be doing more," said Sir Simon Clarke, Onward director. "He's a big draw and the only person still alive who's led the Conservatives back into government, so he is uniquely qualified to talk about that journey and make sure we get the policy as well as the politics right."
People close to Cameron said he supported the party and Badenoch and had a history of helping fundraising efforts.
The Conservatives did not respond to requests for comment. Cameron's office declined to comment.

---
---
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026
No: 42,399 ★
Printed in London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Dublin, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul, Dubai

9"770307"176135"
STOCK MARKETS | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | S&P 500 | 7580.85 | 7541.40 | 0.52 | Nasdaq Composite | 25351.86 | 25164.36 | 0.75 | Dow Jones Ind | 51806.64 | 51983.98 | -0.34 | Euro Stoxx 50 | 6144.56 | 6176.06 | -0.51 | FTSEurofirst 300 | 2573.69 | 2589.34 | -0.60 | FTSE 100 | 10638.43 | 10761.33 | -1.14 | FTSE All-Share | 5746.54 | 5808.28 | -1.06 | CAC 40 | 8020.31 | 8047.69 | -0.34 | Xetra Dax | 25864.62 | 25981.09 | -0.45 | Nikkei | Closed | 63081.86 | - | Hang Seng | 23525.97 | 23393.32 | 0.57 | MSCI World | 4885.00 | 4865.00 | 0.41 | MSCI EM | 1578.20 | 1553.50 | 1.59 | MSCI ACWI | 1122.30 | 1116.40 | 0.53 | World Markets
CURRENCIES | Pair | Nov 03 | Prev | Pair | Nov 03 | Prev | $/€ | 1.119 | 1.119 | €/$ | 0.893 | 0.894 | $/£ | 1.342 | 1.341 | £/$ | 0.745 | 0.746 | £/€ | 0.834 | 0.834 | €/£ | 1.198 | 1.198 | ¥/$ | 158.445 | 157.815 | ¥/€ | 177.371 | 176.619 | ¥/£ | 212.562 | 211.669 | £ Index | 86.310 | 86.30 | Sfr/€ | 0.919 | 0.915 | Sfr/£ | 1.101 | 1.097 | CRYPTO | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | Bitcoin | 77650.90 | 77403.41 | 0.32 | Ethereum | 2294.85 | 2267.10 | 1.22 | Nov 03 | Prev | %chg | Oil WTI | 95.97 | 96.46 | -0.51 | Oil Brent $ | 103.46 | 104.77 | -1.25 | Gold $ | 3927.06 | 3967.51 | -1.02 | GOVERNMENT BONDS | Yield (%) | Nov 03 | Prev | Chg | US 2 Yr | 4.63 | 4.59 | 0.04 | US 10 Yr | 4.96 | 4.88 | 0.08 | US 30 Yr | 5.33 | 5.25 | 0.08 | UK 2 Yr | 4.85 | 4.79 | 0.06 | UK 10 Yr | 5.26 | 5.20 | 0.06 | UK 30 Yr | 5.70 | 5.63 | 0.07 | JPN 2 Yr | 1.86 | 1.86 | 0.00 | JPN 10 Yr | 2.80 | 2.79 | 0.01 | JPN 30 Yr | 3.94 | 3.94 | 0.00 | GER 2 Yr | 3.04 | 3.03 | 0.01 | GER 10 Yr | 3.31 | 3.29 | 0.02 | GER 30 Yr | 3.69 | 3.66 | 0.03 | Prices are latest for edition Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com
---
Why have one holiday home when you can have access to luxury homes across Europe, Asia and Africa within one structured co-ownership model?
THE HIDEAWAYS CLUB
thehideawaysclub.com

Investment in this scheme is restricted to certified high net worth individuals or sophisticated investors. Evidence of certification will be required before detailed information is provided. The value of this investment can fall as well as rise, so it carries a risk to your capital and investors may receive less than the amount invested. It may also be difficult to sell the investment and sometimes, it may be impossible to sell at any price. Do not invest unless you have carefully considered whether you can afford the risks and whether the investment is suitable for you. This financial promotion has been issued by Valley Financial Services Inc., 2019, by Gibraltar Securities, Marina Bay, Gibraltar, authorities of the Northern Alternative Investment and Manager of the United States or its associates with the United States (or its associates with the United States) and the United States (or its associates with the United States).
NATIONAL
Renewables
---
Bill will place legal duty on projects to provide funds for communities
JIM PICKARD AND RACHEL MILLARD
LONDON
Renewable energy companies will be legally obliged to invest in the communities where they build projects as ministers seek to boost public support for net zero at a time of fracturing political consensus on tackling climate change.
Communities would also be given the right to buy up to 20 per cent of a renewable energy project near them — up from the current 5 per cent — and would also apply to smaller schemes of at least 1 megawatt for the first time.
A new “energy independence bill” will be laid before parliament today to set out the measures, which mark a change from the existing system of voluntary support.
It follows the government's announcement last week that its priority was "first and foremost cheaper energy, with clean power key to achieving this" in an apparent scaling back of the "mission" to decarbonise the entire power system by 2030.
According to the latest public attitudes tracker conducted by the business department this summer, almost eight in 10 people were concerned about climate change, while 51 per cent expected the long-term impact of net zero to be positive. Seventy-nine per cent supported the use of renewable energy.
But both the Conservatives and Reform UK have pledged to scrap the legally binding target of decarbonising the entire economy by 2050 – signed into law in 2019 by then prime minister Theresa May — arguing that doing so would help bring down energy costs.
Under the measures to be included in the bill, community benefit funds will be mandatory for all such schemes over 5MW. Groups will have to strike legally binding agreements with communities, which then decide how money is spent.
At present, some developers fund sports fields or community centres or other infrastructure when they build solar farms or onshore wind farms, but the system is an ad hoc “patchwork approach” to support.
The government will propose that eligible projects must provide a minimum amount of compensation, with £5,000 per megawatt of power a year for wind projects and £700 per megawatt for solar schemes. That money can go towards projects picked by local leaders, ranging from football pitches to skills training for young people or household grants to tackle fuel poverty.
“Currently, there is a patchwork approach to how communities benefit from hosting renewable energy projects,” one official said. “Some receive financial support, while others see little in return, despite hosting the clean power Britain needs to protect households from volatile global fossil fuel markets.”
Officials reassured the industry that further secondary legislation will be needed to implement these measures.
The legislation will also be used to put a new body called Great British Grid, part of Great British Energy, on a statutory footing. GBG will compete with the FTSE 100 company National Grid and other network owners to support the delivery of grid upgrades.
The plan to let communities have a stake in local renewable projects is part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham's broader desire to give voters greater control over utilities.
The energy independence bill, announced in the King's Speech in May, comprises a broad mix of energy policies. It is expected to include a legal commitment to Labour's manifesto pledge to end new exploration licences in the North Sea and to ban fracking.
Miatta Fahnbulleh, energy secretary, said the government wanted to make sure local people benefited from projects in their community.
“This means more of the benefits staying in local communities, rather than passing them by,” she said. “Because if your community helps power Britain, it should share in the rewards.”
---

Rifts widen in unionist party
after most popular MP quits
in boost for rival Sinn Féin
JUDE WEBBER — DUBLIN
Northern Ireland's biggest pro-UK party is under pressure to prevent further splits after its most popular MP resigned over the handling of a planned Protestant parade through a nationalist area.
The announcement by Carla Lockhart that she was quitting the Democratic Unionist Party to sit as an independent has left the DUP with its lowest number of MPs for 25 years.
Her decision is the latest blow for the DUP as the party struggles to regain momentum against its energised nationalist rival Sinn Féin ahead of regional elections due next May.
The MP for Upper Bann said on Mon-
day she was making the decision
because the party had refused to force
out Michelle O'Neill, the Sinn Féin first
minister, from the region's Stormont
executive over her decision to join pro-
tests blocking a planned Protestant
parade from Drumcree church in a
largely Catholic area of Portadown.
No one has yet followed Lockhart. But what she saw as the DUP's weak response to the parade dispute has left the party "in a considerable mess", said Owen Polley, a unionism commentator.
Lockhart's departure means the DUP, which had 10 MPs in 2017 when its support kept then prime minister Theresa May in power, now has four MPs.
“Her seat was the safest by some margin . . . it suggests there’s a growing problem with the grassroots and just with confidence in what the party’s doing,” Polley added.
Northern Ireland's most contentious Protestant parade had been banned since 1998. But the Orange Order was given the surprise go-ahead to march in September, prompting a nationalist outcry. Weeks of stand-off and legal action ensued before Northern Ireland secretary Sir Chris Bryant halted it last month.
The High Court in Belfast last week upheld his decision.
The DUP and other unionist parties
Out of step: Portadown Orange Lodge marchers. Below, Carla Lockhart Charles McQuillan/Getty

have branded O'Neill a lawbreaker for helping block the parade. It is not yet clear if she will face charges.
Lockhart had wanted the DUP to withdraw its deputy first minister, Emma Little-Pengelly, from Stormont to force out O'Neill, since it is a shared office under Northern Ireland's power-sharing rules. Instead, the DUP has agreed only to cease joint activities.
Sinn Féin, by contrast, has been boosted. The party is the largest in Stormont but has failed to deliver on key concerns of its own voters – such as construction of a Gaelic Games stadium – while the executive has failed to agree a budget.
While Drumcree “has backfired for unionism”, the bounce for Sinn Féin “has made it much easier to evade questions about its record in government”, said Sam McBride, Northern Ireland editor of the Belfast Telegraph.
A More in Common poll last week found Sinn Féin had enjoyed a fillip, rising to 30 per cent in Stormont voting intention. That was 5 points higher than a More in Common poll in July and compared with a five-year low rating of 22 per cent in a Lucid Talk poll earlier this year. The DUP languished on 18 per cent in the More in Common poll.
Furthermore, “you’ve gone from having a really dominant DUP, which you’ve had since the early 2000s, to it now being only a plurality of unionism, rather than a majority of unionism, with 43 per cent of the unionist vote going to the DUP in our poll,” said Conleth Burns, associate director of More in Common.
With Stormont elections looming, the dispute “has acted like a clarion call to loyalists and republicans alike”, said Katy Hayward, professor of political sociology at Queen’s University in Belfast. But while Sinn Féin was turning
'Her seat was the safest by some margin . . . it suggests there's a growing problem with the grassroots'
that into electoral gain, unionists were riven by differences, such as whether to continue or collapse Stormont.
Discomfort among some unionists at sharing power with nationalists “will always be exploited by hardliners to gain political ground. But such ground is always taken from other unionists, not from nationalists,” Hayward said.
A Lucid Talk poll in the summer placed the DUP on 15 per cent, one point behind its smaller, more moderate rival the Ulster Unionist Party.
That result also reflected voter anger at the conviction of former leader Jeffrey Donaldson on child sex and rape charges. He has since been sentenced to 15 years.
Meanwhile, Stormont limps on but has failed to agree a budget over what all parties say is insufficient funding from London. Further talks between the parties and Bryant are due this week.
Retirement
---
ALAN LIVSEY, CHRIS SMYTH AND CALUM KAPOOR — LONDON
Private sector workers will be given the automatic right to a lifetime pension income under government plans that unwind previous moves to give pensioners freedom over their money in retirement.
The shift, outlined in a consultation by the Department for Work and Pensions launched yesterday, aims to ensure older people do not run out of money in the years after they leave the workforce.
Under the new plan, known as a guided retirement, millions of savers' pension contributions would be pooled to offer "a fully managed pension people can rely on for life".
This will provide an option to those retirees who do not want to make investment decisions on their portfolios during their later lives.
David Cameron's Conservative government had granted pensioners greater freedom to build their pension plans as they wished, such as making their own decisions about which assets to invest in. However, the move was criticised for in essence forcing people to become investment experts.
“Too many people reach retirement with no clear plan for turning their savings into a reliable income that will last for life,” according to the consultation.
Ministers have praised the success of pension auto-enrolment in encouraging millions to secure more for retirement and describe the latest proposals as an attempt to apply a similar principle to the same group of savers.
Torsten Bell, pensions minister, said the plan “will offer a simpler way to turn savings into income, regardless of which workplace pension people have”.
DWP estimates that almost half of those savers accessing their pension pots for the first time choose to withdraw the entire amount, with the risk that they will have nothing left near the end of their lives.
“It’s unrealistic to expect millions of individuals to suddenly become retirement income experts,” said Kirsty Ross at the People’s Pension, a workplace pension provider.
Although pensioners have long had the option to use their pension savings to buy an income annuity, the new scheme will mean that members' pension pots will be held in a range of asset classes. This could provide better growth over time than an annuity, most of which are not adjusted for inflation.
Simon Eagle, collective defined contribution pensions expert at consultants WTW, said the scheme is expected to give an income 40 per cent higher on average than a typical annuity.
But Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister, said that although the government wanted to ensure a certain retirement income, "people don't want to take everything they've got and spread it thin – they want chunks at the start".
Another problem with the proposal, he added, is that pensioners could end up “stuck for life” with a guided retirement scheme if they did not opt out within the first 12 months based on HM Revenue & Customs guidance.
Although the new retirement collective schemes should offer a guaranteed income for life, the amount of potential income is unlikely to be assured.
FT FINANCIAL TIMES
MAKE A WISE INVESTMENT
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
---
DELPHINE STRAUSS
British workers are increasingly disengaged from their jobs and have become less willing to go the extra mile to help their employer, according to a survey that lends substance to claims that productivity has suffered from a wave of so-called “quiet quitting” in the aftermath of the pandemic.
Analysis of data from the British Social Attitudes survey, published yesterday by the Resolution Foundation think-tank, shows employees have become more disengaged in the past 10 years and less willing to put in extra effort. There is also a sharp drop in the proportion who want full-time hours — a change that has been driven by men.
One in four workers was not even “fairly” satisfied with their main job – the gloomiest in the survey’s 35-year history and up from one in five when the question was last asked in 2015.
among managers and professionals.
The proportion willing to work harder than required to help their employer succeed, which had previously risen steadily since the 1990s, fell from 69 per cent in 2015 to 55 per cent last year, with the biggest drop in commitment seen
The idea that workers have been “quiet quitting” — a supposed post-pandemic trend of people limiting their efforts to essential duties — “is quite literally what the evidence shows”, said Hannah Slaughter, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation think-tank, which conducted the analysis.
The BSA's findings fitted the post-pandemic zeitgeist of people “feeling they want to prioritise other things in their life”, Slaughter said, and “could have knock-on implications for productivity", helping to explain its recent weakness.
Data problems make it hard to tell how UK productivity growth has evolved since Covid but the latest revisions still point to a period of extreme weakness with only tentative recent improvement.

Many staff are less likely to put in extra effort at work — Toby Melville/Reuters
Slaughter said the post-Covid shift towards working from home could help explain why people felt less committed to their employer. But she noted that people could also be less willing to make extra effort because employers were already asking more of them — even as opportunities for advancement, better pay or more autonomy are drying up.
There are longstanding concerns over work becoming more intense and less secure in low-paid sectors, Slaughter noted.
But the BSA's findings also show a sharp rise over the past decade, from 25 per cent to 36 per cent, in the share of managers and professionals who find it difficult to take an hour or two off for personal reasons — consistent with hybrid workers feeling “always on”.
At the same time, the share of workers who saw opportunities to advance in their job fell from 35 per cent in 2015 to 25 per cent last year.
Slaughter said it was striking how “broad-based” the sense of disengagement was across age groups and occupational groupings, with the sharpest fall in willingness to work harder seen among managers and professionals.
The fall in job satisfaction was far larger among men than women, as was a shift in preference for part-time over full-time hours.
The UK has been ageing more slowly than other countries Share of people aged 70 or over
NATIONAL
---
Economic, social and political upheavals expected as rapid increase in numbers comes to an end


High migration= 455,000 net migration yearly; low migration = 105,000 net migration yearly; principal projection = 230,000 net migration yearly and long-term fertility at 1.42; high fertility variant = long term fertility at 1.62; low fertility variant = long term fertility at 1.22
Source: FT analysis of ONS data

Sources: UN population projections; ONS • Fertility rates refer to England and Wales

Source: UN population forecasts, 2026


Source: Department for Work and Pensions
Source: ONS
VALENTINA ROMEI
ECONOMICS REPORTER
In the 1970s, the UK experienced industrial unrest, soaring inflation and a wave of emigration. Its population stopped growing for the first sustained period since the second world war.
Half a century later, the country may be on the verge of a similar moment.
Britain's population – whose robust rise has inflamed politics over the past decade – is on course to grow only marginally over the next few years.
It could peak in the mid-2030s, with far-reaching consequences for the economy and society. Already growth has slowed, with numbers rising just 0.3 per cent to 69.5mn in the year to mid-2025. That was the slowest rate since 1998 excluding the pandemic.
Deaths are expected to outnumber births from 2026, according to official projections, leaving migration as the sole driver of population growth.
But net migration itself is dropping. Last week, the Office for Budget Responsibility cut its forecast for net migration to 120,000 this year and an average of 182,000 a year between 2026 and 2031. That compares with nearly 300,000 forecast a year last November.
"When looking at the next few years, net migration will almost certainly decline because of policy restrictions; fewer people are now coming to the UK," said Ben Brindle, senior researcher at the Migration Observatory. Over the next five years, Brindle doesn't expect "much population change at all".
---
In the spring, the Office for National Statistics projected that the UK population would peak in 2054, with the expansion exclusively driven by a net migration of 230,000 a year.
But if these projections are adjusted to take into account the OBR's latest migration forecast, a different picture emerges: the population would grow only marginally then peak in the mid-2030s. By the mid-2070s, it would have fallen about 6mn from its peak.
Some parts of the country, including Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, are already seeing populations flatlining. London registered its first decline since the pandemic, in contrast with its rapid expansion during the 2010s.
Whether the total population declines depends on the immigration measures pursued unless there is a rebound in births. That is difficult to predict. Shabana Mahmood, the Labour home secretary, this week softened some restrictions on permanent residency.

The UK-EU youth mobility scheme, under discussion, could increase migration, as could rejoining the EU.
In contrast, Nigel Farage, Reform UK's leader, has called the population "explosion" the country's "single biggest problem", arguing it has damaged quality of life. Should Reform take power, its plans imply at least 2mn people would have to leave.
The UK has so far been relatively insulated from the demographic pressures facing other advanced economies. It has had higher fertility rates than Japan, Italy, Spain and South Korea.
"The ageing trend is more gradual . . . but the need for policy action still exists," said Willem Adema, a senior economist at the OECD.
Perhaps the most noticeable change so far has been school closures, as the number of children falls. Across England, 86 per cent of primary schools had unfilled places.
"We could see people in many
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood has eased some rules
areas disappear, because you can get to a point where there aren't people in those areas to run basic services, things like GP surgeries and schools, but also shops and restaurants," said Brindle of the Migration Observatory.
The population stagnating or declining could ease pressures on housing, infrastructure and the environment, many experts argue. Andrew Scott, professor of economics at the University of Oxford, also points to a “longevity dividend” — the economic and social gains from people living longer, healthier and more productive lives.
But the OECD and other organisations warn that declining fertility rates put future generations' prosperity at risk.
The UK is raising its retirement age to 67. But asking people to work for longer is not straightforward. Britain's employment rate falls from 83 per cent at age 50 to just 58 per cent at age 62.
“Health, social care and pension spending will rise, while the tax base grows more slowly,” said Jonathan
Portes, professor of economics and public policy at King's College London. Persistently low fertility “may also create labour shortages” in crucial sectors.
The OBR warned this summer that UK public debt was on an “unsustainable” long-term path, partly because of demographic shifts. Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced plans to adjust the triple lock on the state pension from 2030 to contain spending and help fund a National Care Service.
Sarah Harper, professor of gerontology at the University of Oxford, called for comprehensive policies to support longer working lives, including life-long learning, alongside affordable childcare and housing, better parental leave and more flexible working arrangements.
One way of offsetting the economic and fiscal pressures is through higher productivity via AI. The technology could help ease labour shortages and boost output per hour worked.
The end of rapid population growth is likely to shift Britain's political debate.
Farage, for example, has started to focus less on the raw numbers of immigrants and more on alleged failures of social integration.
More broadly, politics may react to the fact that voters skew older. That, ironically, may mean it becomes hard to implement the policy changes that experts say are necessary: an older electorate is less likely to vote in favour of pension cuts and help for students.
In the 1970s, the UK's population decline lasted for a few years, with another brief spell in the early 1980s. This time it may be similarly brief. "We could return to [past rates of population growth] after about five years," said Brindle of the Migration Observatory.
As demography changes, government will have an opportunity to respond, said Tony Travers, professor at the London School of Economics. “Enough of the population will accept some immigration, but it has to make sense, and with a very powerful sense that it’s a managed number,” he added.
Brussels summit
---
PETER FOSTER, GEORGE PARKER AND ANDY BOUNDS
Prime Minister Andy Burnham's promised “reset” deal with Brussels is unlikely to receive a final sign-off at this month's landmark EU-UK summit after the bloc demanded an agreement on cheaper access to British universities be struck first.
A draft joint statement being worked on by EU officials says that while pacts on several issues under discussion could be finalised by the November 20 meeting, they will only be put into effect once the UK reduces tuition fees for EU students.
The statement, seen by the FT, is still being negotiated by the two sides, but British officials concede the implementation of any “reset” package – which will include cutting barriers to trade in food – will be contingent on the issue of university fees being resolved.
The EU wants the UK to allow students from the bloc to pay the same fees as British counterparts and has proposed a deadline of six months for a deal on this to be struck. Brussels is determined any agreement should apply to all EU students and not just those going to the UK as part of a so-called “youth experience scheme”, which will have a cap on the number of places available.
A deal on fees is likely to cost British universities hundreds of millions of pounds as they would no longer be able to charge EU students overseas rates, often three or four times the £9,790-per-year cost for those in the UK.
Both sides are hopeful of finishing talks ahead of the summit to reduce trade barriers for foodstuffs, the linking of carbon markets and the youth mobility scheme, which will allow 18- to 30-year-olds to study, work and travel in each other's countries.
However, the draft joint statement seen by the FT, which has been drafted by the EU but not agreed to by the UK, references the “conclusion of negotiations” on these three deals in the future rather than them being officially signed off at the summit. An EU diplomat said: “The real issue is whether we decide legally on signing and applying [these three deals] only after the tuition-fee negotiations yield results.”
EU ambassadors meeting in Brussels today are likely to back the idea.
A British official signalled the prime minister was engaged in “tough talks” with Brussels but was keen to open university doors to overseas students.
"The prime minister sees real value in helping our universities attract the best students from around the world, and is proud that top international students want to come to our world-class universities," the official added.
There are still issues to resolve in the proposed “reset” agreements, including how many people could access the youth experience scheme annually, according to officials. The EU wants 150,000 visas a year while the UK initially offered 50,000. The UK under Burnham’s predecessor Sir Keir Starmer was willing to compromise on 100,000.
For its part, the UK is seeking to use a deal on tuition fees to push for improved participation in the bloc's “Made in Europe” procurement and subsidy scheme, which Burnham has warned poses a serious threat to UK industries.
The Cabinet Office said it would not comment on leaks or provide a running commentary on live negotiations.
The European Commission has been approached for comment.
---
DELPHINE STRAUSS AND DAVID SHEPPARD
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood has scrapped her plan to make foreign care workers wait longer to win permanent UK residency – but the concession only softens the edges of what remains a radical reform of the immigration system.
Plans set out on Monday will delay settlement for around half a million people already in the UK, the Home Office estimates.
They will create a new class of people whose status is essentially temporary — with refugees facing waits of up to 30 years if they arrive by unauthorised routes.
It remains unclear whether the reforms will bring the fiscal benefits claimed.
What does this mean for migrants working outside the care sector? Skilled workers with earnings below £50,270 will now face a 10-year wait for permanent residency, as will their dependants – incurring visa fees running into tens of thousands of pounds. This group is estimated to number almost a quarter of a million.
Immigration lawyers say professionals in sectors such as architecture, accountancy and engineering will be affected – and that their employers may struggle to keep them on, as they may have not have budgeted for ongoing visa fees.
"We will definitely have clients in that position," said Katie Newbury, partner at law firm Kingsley Napley.
However, high earners and their employers are potential winners from the reforms, with those in the top tax bracket able to gain the right to live indefinitely in the UK after three years – down from the current five.
High earners' partners, however, will not always be able to settle at the same time, and it remains unclear what the new rules mean for children.
---
International students in particular could face bigger barriers to settling in the UK in future, as the government has scrapped the “Long Residence” route. That had allowed them to qualify for permanent residency after 10 years, counting time spent on temporary study and graduate visas.
Because visa rules are already much tougher than in the past, many workers who come to the UK in future will be higher-rate taxpayers able to settle after five years, said Marley Morris, associate director at the think-tank IPPR.
However, even the top earners the government wants to attract to the UK may be deterred by uncertainty over the status of family members, lawyers said.
The government's revised plans now leave open a path to settlement for non-working partners, provided joint household income is high enough.
Children who turn 18 while their parents are waiting for settlement will be on the same track – meaning they may be unable to leave home, or attend a UK university on the lower fees available to permanent residents.
Zeena Luchowa, partner at the law firm Laura Devine, said she had already seen “senior individuals” change their minds about coming to the UK halfway through the process, because of the last year's uncertainty over the reforms.
---
That remains to be seen. The new rules make it harder for many migrants who are granted refugee status to achieve the long-term right to remain in the country, particularly if they arrive via small boats.
That could reduce the incentive for migrants to attempt “small boat” crossings from France.
Asylum seekers who did not come to the UK as part of a formal government resettlement scheme will need to wait 20 years for settlement, though this can be shortened to 10 years if they enter “sustained” work or study. The clock would only start once work or study commences.
Those who tried to circumvent UK border controls, for example by arriving on small boats, will need to wait an additional 10 years. Arrivals by small boats are already down more than 40 per cent so far in 2026, partly due to greater co-operation between Britain and France.
---
The UK estimates the reforms would cut the benefits bill by billions. But the Home Office has not published an impact assessment.
Analysts say claims of big fiscal gains were always overblown, even before the concession to care workers seen as the biggest potential risk to taxpayers.
This is because, although the reforms delay the point at which people claim working-age benefits, the biggest fiscal costs of migration come later, as migrants' children go through school and as people retire.
The Home Office acknowledged that the overall fiscal impact of the reforms would depend on whether they ended up deterring or attracting top earners, and on the incentives they created for refugees and other low-paid migrants to earn more. Some skilled workers will now find it harder to move to a better-paid job, if they rely on employers sponsoring a visa.
Do the reforms signal a change of political direction by Andy Burnham? The prime minister has already softened the government's position on immigration: he said on Sunday it was "difficult to say" if migration was now "too high or too low".
Mahmood also hinted she may support a change in direction, saying yesterday that the government had promised to get migration down “and we have”.
Burnham has appeared open to discussing the return of freedom of movement with the EU, although not until after the next general election.
Nigel Farage's anti-immigration Reform UK has slipped behind Labour and the Conservatives in the polls, having led for much of this parliament.
Even so, the combined vote of Reform and the far-right anti-immigration Restore UK still puts them close to Labour in the polls.
That suggests that, if Burnham believes the salience of immigration has waned for voters, he is taking something of a gamble.
INTERNATIONAL
Defence gaps
---
Drone and missile assault targets power plants and substations before winter
FABRICE DEPREZ — KYIV
A massive Russian drone and missile attack targeted Ukrainian energy infrastructure across the country overnight yesterday, as Moscow ratchets up its deadly air campaign ahead of winter.
More than a dozen energy facilities were hit across nine regions, according to Ukrainian authorities. The country's air force reported intercepting just three of the 17 Russian ballistic missiles fired by Moscow, highlighting Kyiv's acute shortage of air-defence interceptors. "Ukraine must be helped to defend its skies, otherwise Russia will never stop," President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said yesterday. The assault continued during the day and represents "one of the largest attacks on Ukraine's energy", state grid operator Ukrenergo said.
Ukraine's largest private energy company DTEK said three of its power plants were knocked offline by “dozens of missiles and drones”. Prime Minister Sergii Koretskyi said power plants and substations had been hit in nine regions.
Russia “is dangerously escalating its efforts to deny Ukrainians critical services like energy this winter”, DTEK executive Maxim Timchenko told the FT.
Moscow's intensifying campaign against Ukraine's energy infrastructure has already led to power outages in Kyiv, sometimes lasting more than 10 hours, and in several other regions.
"This year, the Russians have adopted a new tactic: they're striking not only power generation facilities but also carrying out strikes against the power grid, against energy distribution infrastructure," Zelenskyy said in a video address on Monday.
An attack on a village near the front-line in the Zaporizhzhia region also killed dozens of civilians on Monday. A first wave of gliding bombs pushed civilians to seek shelter within a closed school used as a humanitarian distribution point. Nine three-tonne gliding bombs levelled the building, with footage showing craters several metres deep and a few slabs of concrete where the building stood. The bombing took place as locals were gathering for distribution of humanitarian aid announced a day earlier on social media.
Officials said the strike killed at least 31 people, including two emergency workers, with 48 still unaccounted for. Deliberately targeting civilians is a war crime under international law.
"The timing and location of the humanitarian distribution were well publicised," Danielle Bell, head of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, said yesterday. "This attack seems to have violated the most fundamental principles of international humanitarian law."
The UN's monitoring mission in Ukraine said it had confirmed 328 civilian deaths in September, a sharp rise from the 249 people killed last year in the same period.
Bolstered by the mass production of a new generation of jet-powered drones and cheap cruise missiles, the Russian attacks have also expanded beyond energy to target Ukrainian logistics and business infrastructure.
Multiple drones also targeted the train station in the nearby city of Dnipro last week, killing 15 people when one of the drones hit a railway platform.
---



Drone and missile warnings test nerves in region after Warsaw raises alert level
RAPHAEL MINDER — LUBLIN
In Poland's eastern city of Lublin, popular with tourists for its medieval gates and pastel facades, residents are growing used to warning sirens and the roar of fighter jets scrambled in response to the threat of Russian drones or missiles.
Locals have been receiving text alerts about possible Russian air incursions since early September, while the city's airport suspended civilian flights six times that month to make room for the military to protect Poland's airspace.
Lublin's experience shows how five years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the war has started to intrude on everyday life in neighbouring Poland. Warsaw has raised the alert level in its eastern regions of Lublin and Subcarpathia after Moscow escalated its bombing of western Ukraine in recent months by using more jet-powered drones and missiles capable of reaching as far as Polish territory. A Russian helicopter also violated Polish airspace near the Russian military base of Kaliningrad in September.
"We had perhaps been thinking too long of this war as something that could happen only on the other side of our border," said Dariusz Krzysztofik, deputy director of the public safety department in Lublin, which is located $100\mathrm{km}$ from the Ukrainian border.
“Russia is now putting a lot of effort into getting us also to panic, although I’m confident that the Russians are actually increasing our resilience and making us more conscious that we really have to help Ukraine.”
In Wąwolnica, a village 35km further west of Lublin, mayor Marcin Łaguna said residents were becoming increasingly nervous about Russia, but also frustrated by “an information overload” of emergency text messages.
“We have no strategic assets worth destroying here, and in any case everybody knows that we don’t have the money to build a shelter to protect us against a big attack,” he said. “The problem is that when people keep getting warnings, they end up ignoring them.”
Ewa Lenartowicz, a resident of Wąwolnica, said she disregarded alerts sent to her phone, but could not sleep
Clockwise from left: Dariusz Krzysztofik, deputy director of the public safety department in Lublin, at the city's crisis management centre; text alerts from the Polish government; and the entrance to a designated underground shelter
Aleksandra Kossowska/FT

Baltic Sea
KALININGRAD (RUSSIA)
POLAND
Warsaw
Łuków
Wawalzie
SUBCARPATHIA — LUBLIN
100km SLOVAKIA
MapLibre ©Mapcreator ©OpenStreetMap through the sound of military aircraft overhead. “We grew up under communism, so my family has always kept food and other emergency reserves in the cellar . . . but it’s a new kind of stress to get woken up by fighter jets,” she said.
Poland has this year allocated almost 5 per cent of GDP to defence, making it proportionately Nato's biggest military spender. Warsaw has ordered aircraft, helicopters and tanks, but investment in civilian protection has lagged behind.
This year, Lublin opened its first fully sealed shelter, capable of housing about 200 people against chemical warfare and radioactive particles. The city plans to upgrade another 101 shelters within three years. “Until 2024, we had no [government] money for such investments,” Krzysztofik said. “We now have some money, but we still need the time.”
Lublin has enough underground car parks and other shelters to protect the population of the greater metropolitan area of more than 450,000 against a Russian drone attack. But only 38,000 residents could now find refuge in shelters designed to withstand a more powerful strike from a Russian Oreshnik ballistic missile, Krzysztofik said.
The city is also racing to expand its network of warning sirens, which can be heard by about 70 per cent of residents, to cover the whole of greater Lublin by year-end. “Everybody is still enjoying a normal life in Lublin, but I think there’s now a different atmosphere than in Warsaw,” said Krzysztofik.
In October, Lublin's authorities started putting green-and-orange signposts on buildings to mark evacuation routes and shelter locations. One recent meeting on emergency procedures attracted 250 people, compared with 10-20 residents attending such events before the summer, Krzysztofik said.
The Polish government is reinforcing its military presence around Lublin in response to Russia's airspace violations but also hybrid warfare attacks. Warsaw has attributed several acts of sabotage to Russia since last November, when
Poland narrowly avoided a train crash after an explosive device damaged Lublin's main railway to the capital.
Last month, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, defence minister, announced that Patriot air-defence batteries would be deployed around Lublin airport for the first time. A new helicopter base will also be established, alongside three extra military units, including a counter-drone brigade in nearby Łuków.
The reinforcements are intended in part to bring Lublin up to the level of Rzeszów in the south-east, whose airport has served as a hub for military and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine since Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion.
The army presence may reassure residents, but local officials worry militari- sation could undermine corporate investments in eastern Poland.
In Wąwolnica, the army is renovating a bridge to meet its transport standards. Mayor Łaguna welcomes this but is pessimistic about the economy. “Investors calculate whether a region is safe, so we have plenty of reasons to worry now also about losing out economically,” he said. “The risk of war with Russia is never going to be attractive.”
Financial support
---
AMY MACKINNON — WASHINGTON
JAMES SHOTTER — JERUSALEM
Donald Trump has said the US will stop providing military aid to Israel at the end of the year, saying the country “no longer needed it”, and describing it as a “bad talking point” as voters headed to the polls for midterm elections.
"Why should we suffer the slings from lunatics like an El-Sayed when [Israelis] don't need it?" the president said yesterday morning, referring to Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who has been a sharp critic of US support for Israel.
The US provides almost \$4bn in annual military assistance to Israel as part of a 10-year agreement that is set to expire in 2028. The funding has been a focus of intense debate due to Israel's devastating offensive in Gaza and has featured prominently in midterm campaigning.
It was not immediately clear whether the president can unilaterally halt the funding, which is appropriated by Congress. While Trump has broad authority to pause weapons transfers, any attempt to cancel funds allocated by lawmakers could face restrictions.
The move is also likely to face significant pushback from within Trump's Republican Party.
Support for military aid to Israel has fallen sharply among Democrats but a poll last month by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs found that 68 per cent of Republicans favour continuing or increasing military aid to the country.
Trump claimed yesterday that he had reached an agreement with Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, to cut off the aid.
"He brought it up. He said, 'I think it would be appropriate if we do not receive aid', because he understands that this is one of their points of contention," Trump said.
Netanyahu's office and the Israeli embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Netanyahu has recently warned that US aid to Israel could be scaled back, saying last month it was “only a matter of time” before Washington’s funding for Israel’s military was cut.
In a US television interview this year, he said he and Trump had discussed gradually weaning Israel off US military aid. But he said he had proposed scaling back the aid over the course of a decade, and has given no public indication that he had agreed for aid to cease as soon as this year.
US support has played a significant role in helping Israel finance the war in Gaza, which was triggered by Hamas's October 7 2023 attack, and has become Israel's longest and most expensive conflict, triggering a surge in military spending.
Under the terms of the agreement between the two countries, which was signed under the administration of Barack Obama, the US provides Israel with \$3.3bn in annual funding, which it can use to purchase US weapons.
The arrangement also includes \$500mn annually for joint projects such as the Iron Dome and David's Sling air-defence systems, which protect against drones and missiles.

Choose the Financial Times subscription for you
\- React to trusted global news everywhere you go, with ft.com and FT apps
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
Trilateral talks
---
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
MAX SEDDON — BERLIN
JOE LEAHY — BEIJING
US, Chinese and Russian officials are discussing a possible meeting between Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin this month when the leaders attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Chinese city of Shenzhen.
People familiar with the situation in Washington, Beijing and Moscow said officials had been holding serious talks about arranging the first trilateral meeting between the heads of state in two weeks' time.
“Work is under way on organising such a meeting,” Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s spokesperson, told the FT.
Later yesterday, Peskov told reporters there was a “general understanding among the participants of this possible meeting that it would be worthwhile and extremely useful”.
Asked about the prospects of a trilateral summit, China's foreign ministry said Beijing was "in communication with relevant parties regarding the meeting between the Chinese and Russian heads of state" but omitted any mention of Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump will travel to Shenzhen in two weeks to attend the Apec summit and hold his third meeting this year with Xi. Before his visit, he will fly to Manila to attend the annual meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Xi and Trump are expected to hold a fourth meeting next month when the Chinese leader visits Miami for the G20. Putin and Xi have met more than 40 times in total, according to Chinese state media, including at least three times this year.
It remains unclear if the three sides are talking together or if Beijing is instead holding bilateral talks with Washington and Moscow. People familiar with the situation warned that China, which would convene the meeting as the host of the Asia-Pacific economic forum, had not yet decided whether to proceed.
One person familiar with the talks said Washington and Moscow were pressing China to agree to a meeting. The Chinese foreign ministry last month said it had “no information to provide” about a possible trilateral summit.
Germany's President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Sunday said Xi seemed confused when he asked him about a possible trilateral summit when they met in China last week. He said Xi asked about the origin of the rumours.
One challenge to hosting a three-way meeting is setting an acceptable agenda for the leaders.
Steinmeier said Xi stated there were no plans for a trilateral meeting to discuss the war in Ukraine and that the Chinese leader added Europeans should be at the table given the war was a European conflict. David Shullman, vice-president at the Asia Society Policy

Possible talks: from left, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping
Institute, said the symbolism of Xi hosting a meeting between Washington, Beijing and Moscow officials would be “striking” even without a substantive agenda.
“Xi, whose support has been indispensable to Russia’s ability to sustain its war of aggression against Ukraine for the past four and a half years, would have an opportunity to present himself as the responsible, pivotal statesman bringing the US and Russia together in pursuit of stability,” said Shullman, who until recently led the US intelligence community’s strategic analysis on China.
"It would be a remarkable diplomatic coup," Shullman added.
A person familiar with Russia's thinking said that Moscow did not expect substantive talks on Ukraine during the mooted summit.
Russia thought China did not want to take a leading role in ending Putin's nearly five-year invasion, instead only taking credit once a peace settlement was in sight, the person said.
Trump has said he is open to holding a trilateral meeting in Shenzhen but has stressed the need to focus on nuclear arms control.
---

As nations rush to upgrade their digital defences, critical AI infrastructure is emerging as the new frontline. Rethink Defence at LombardOdier.com
rethink everything.
17 96
LOMBARD ODIER
LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH
PRIVATE BANKING ASSET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
Companies' debt levels remain low
INTERNATIONAL
---
While older savers are in line to benefit, younger people will find it difficult to buy homes and goods
Younger households have fewer assets and more housing debt, leaving them more exposed to interest rate rises


Households with two or more people. Assumes 1 percentage point increase in the policy rate, with fixed pass-through ratio from the policy rate to each interest rate
Sources: Oxford Economics; Ministry of Internal Affairs


Sources: Oxford Economics; Ministry of Finance • Data from 1985-2026
Property prices in central Tokyo, below, have risen at nearly double the national average Philip Fong/AFP/Getty Images
DAVID KEOHANE, HARRY DEMPSEY AND JANA TAUSCHINSKI — TOKYO
Japan may still have some of the lowest interest rates in the world, but the rapid increase expected by economists will have far-reaching implications for a population still coming to terms with the end of an era of deflation.
At 1.25 per cent, the Bank of Japan's main policy rate is already at its highest in 30 years. That is still well below annual inflation, but substantial rate increases could end the erosion of the value of bank savings, mostly held by older Japanese, while making it harder for younger people to buy homes and consumer goods.
The rapid increase in interest rates is shaping up to be a “war between generations”, as much as between rich and poor, said Shigeto Nagai, chief Japan economist at Oxford Economics.
“For households overall, interest rate increases are going to be positive because of the massive deposits they hold,” said Sota Takano, senior economist at Itochu Research Institute. “But if you are aged 30 to 40, and you want to get a mortgage but have not built up the kind of assets older people have, then you are going to be hit the hardest.”
Goki Masui, a 46-year-old legal professional, certainly feels like a winner. He bought a home in Greater Tokyo, where property prices have risen much more than in many areas of Japan, and is untroubled by the prospect of higher borrowing costs.
"I own a home and its value has skyrocketed since 2011. Looking at my balance sheet, I feel there's no problem at all," Masui said. "But for young people, interest rates are going up, money is hard to borrow and house prices themselves are high, so they can't buy them."
For Yuto Horiguchi, 30, the very idea of taking out a housing loan is laughable. "I don't have that sort of luxury," he said. "I need my wages to go up."
While Japanese wages are at last rising faster than inflation, Horiguchi is one of many people of his age in Tokyo who have not seen their incomes keep up with property prices.
Nationwide, residential property prices rose 4.4 per cent in 2025, broadly in line with wage growth among younger workers, according to Takano at Itochu. But in central Tokyo, property prices jumped 8.3 per cent.
"The main challenge for younger homebuyers until now has been the sharp rise in property prices," Takano said. "From here, rising mortgage rates are likely to make home ownership increasingly difficult as well."
The vast majority of Japanese take out variable-rate mortgages due to the recent history of rock-bottom rates. Roughly 75 per cent of new mortgages in Japan are variable, a far higher proportion than in the euro area, US or UK.
Even as rates look set to rise, many borrowers are unwilling to abandon variable-rate mortgages. According to Mogecheck, a mortgage broker in Tokyo, such mortgages currently carry average interest rates of about 1.3 to 1.6 per cent compared with 3.8 per cent for 35-year fixed-rate loans. Japan's headline consumer price annual inflation rate was 2.1 per cent in September.
A 28-year-old finance sector worker who declined to be named said he took out a 35-year, ¥47mn (\$300,000) housing loan in September at a variable rate of 1 per cent. His monthly payments of ¥110,000 would have risen significantly at the 3 per cent rate offered under a fixed-rate mortgage.
"I wanted to take advantage of those low borrowing costs and build up my assets," he said. "Stock prices have been rising recently so I'm hoping that the assets I have invested there will grow."
Some borrowers are also pushing out the length of mortgages, even taking out 50-year loans.
A Cabinet Office simulation found a one percentage point increase in mortgage rates would leave holders in their thirties with an average additional annual interest burden of about ¥240,000, equivalent to roughly 4 per cent of disposable income.

Under repayment terms offered by many lenders, monthly payments stay unchanged for five years even if interest rates rise. But since borrowers repay less principal per month, that pushes any problems further down the road.
Takashi Shiozawa, an executive with Mogecheck, said that while inflation-adjusted mortgage rates remained negative, the BoJ was narrowing that gap. He warned that banks had begun tightening lending standards for 50-year mortgages in recent months. “People are increasingly wondering whether they should buy now because they’re worried that, as mortgage rates rise, property prices could fall,” Shiozawa said.
Japan remains a low-leverage economy, but higher rates will still affect consumer borrowing from car purchases to luxury goods.
According to the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, cash remains the most common way to buy a car, with conventional loans and automakers' financing each used by about 15 per cent of buyers.
'People are wondering whether they should buy now because they're worried that, as mortgage rates rise, property prices could fall'
Carmaker Nissan said rising funding costs had forced lenders to increase rates after years of keeping them steady. Dealers were finding financing discussions increasingly difficult as cars became more expensive, it said.
The squeeze is also emerging in other areas of consumer spending. Second-hand luxury goods retailer Allu said in August it was cutting the number of interest-free instalments available on some shopping loans from 60 to 24 because of rising rates, shortening the period over which customers could spread the cost of purchases.
Takahiro Yamaguchi wants to expand his rice farm in Ibaraki Prefecture north-east of Tokyo by 50 per cent, the kind of shift to larger-scale agriculture that would help Japan address its low self-sufficiency in food as its workforce contracts. But a slump in rice prices and rising interest rates on loans to buy autonomous tractors and other machinery make Yamaguchi cautious. A loan for a warehouse is becoming a burden.
“We’d like to push ahead as fast as we can but there is a possibility we could be stopped in our tracks,” he said. “Taking today’s interest rates into account, we might end up delaying it a year.”
Small businesses are among Japan's more vulnerable companies as interest rates rise. Oxford Economics estimates a one percentage point increase in borrowing rates could push the proportion of lossmaking small businesses from 27 per cent to 31 per cent.
Economists said lower profits could have knock-on negative effects on capital spending, and therefore small enterprises' competitiveness and ability to raise wages for the 70 per cent of the Japanese workforce they employ.
Masaki Nakano at the Research Institute of Japan Finance Corporation, a government-owned lender, said strong demand for semiconductors and AI was outweighing the tightening effect of higher interest rates. But further increases could lead to a “widening of the gaps” between stronger and weaker companies, he said.
Masayuki Fujino, who runs Fuji Seiki, a precision manufacturer in Tokyo, said higher rates were “like the damage from a series of jabs in boxing, gradually having more and more of an effect”.
A more vibrant economy liberated from deflation could eventually outweigh any short-term pain from higher rates for younger Japanese, who are already saving and investing more. Households headed by someone under 30 have the fastest growth in financial assets of any age group – jumping 62 per cent between 2019 and 2024 to an average of ¥3.2mn, government data shows.
But they remain substantially poorer than households headed by someone in their sixties, which hold an average of ¥23.4mn in financial assets.
Takeo Kondo, 77-year-old owner of a signage business, is one of the many elderly Japanese who would benefit from better returns on their savings.
"There aren't really any downsides for me," he said.
With returns on even five-year bank deposits still well below inflation, the finance ministry says some older retail investors have been moving money into higher-yielding government bonds and the rising stock market.
Across Japanese households, the proportion of financial assets held in cash and deposits fell five percentage points in the year to June 2026, while the share held in securities rose six points, according to the Japan Research Institute.
US veteran
---
DEMETRI SEVASTOPULO — WASHINGTON
GEORGE HAMMOND — SAN FRANCISCO
OpenAI has hired Dan Driscoll, the former US Army secretary who resigned following tensions with defence secretary Pete Hegseth, as the military seeks to expand its use of AI to enhance national and cyber security.
The Iraq war veteran and close friend of vice-president JD Vance will join the group in a newly created role as senior counsellor for national security modernisation, OpenAI told the FT.
The San Francisco-based group added that Driscoll would focus on working with American allies to advance the responsible use of AI.
“Dan will work with OpenAI teams and leaders across governments, industry, academia and allied institutions to advance practical modernisation initiatives to advance the build-out of democratic AI,” the company said. It added that Driscoll would help its teams “understand the operational needs of global national security institutions”.
At the Pentagon, Driscoll drove reform efforts aimed at introducing new technology more quickly and making weapons more interoperable. Earlier this year, he organised a hackathon called Operation Jailbreak to improve communications between weapons using lessons learnt in Ukraine.
The 40-year-old former defence official who clashed with Hegseth over the Pentagon chief's firing of several widely respected army officers has been tipped to play a senior role in any potential Vance 2028 presidential campaign.
“National security requirements are changing faster than at any time in the past 50 years,” Driscoll said. “I’m joining OpenAI to help the US and our allies put this technology to work responsibly, for the people who keep us safe.”
OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the US had an opportunity to work with countries to spread the adoption of democratic AI and that Driscoll would “strengthen American leadership and help us do that”. OpenAI said Driscoll would advise public and private sector partners on modernising policy and ways to “unlock practical uses of AI to improve national security and . . . support democratic principles”.
OpenAI has provided cyber defence in several European countries, including France, Germany and Poland, with access to its models. It has also allowed the Ukrainian government to access a programme called Daybreak designed to help identify software vulnerabilities.
The tools being developed by OpenAI and its rivals are regarded as critical to US national security, both as a form of defence and as a potential vulnerability.
Earlier this year, OpenAI expanded its relationship with the Pentagon, agreeing to deploy its AI models in classified settings following the collapse of talks between rival Anthropic and Hegseth.
OpenAI was widely expected to go public this year, having confidentially filed its initial public offering prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission in June. But it has deferred its listing until next year and is instead seeking to raise \$20bn in a private funding round this month.
Adam Tooze see Opinion
Theft accusations
---
MARTON DUNAI — BUDAPEST
Serbian authorities have detained the owner of Alta Bank and accused him of emptying the deposit vault after Aleksandar Vučić's recent election loss.
Davor Macura and two other bank officials were arrested following searches at the bank's premises and Macura's home, Serbian police said yesterday. Macura is suspected of illegally removing more than €380mn worth of cash from the bank's vault, they added.
The National Bank of Serbia on Saturday revoked Alta Bank's operating licence, saying it had come under a financial and liquidity strain after its clients, many of Russian nationality, made large withdrawals and millions of euros left the country last week.
Alta Bank and Macura were among the first targets of an anti-corruption drive following the fall of Vučić, whose authoritarian 12-year rule ended when a student-led movement defeated his SNS party in October 25 elections. Vučić had called the snap vote after resigning as president, hoping to retain power.
Macura's alleged accomplices, the director of Alta's treasury and cash management department and a treasury operations associate, “handed [Macura] their access cards to the vault or enabled him to enter the ‘Depo’ vault without authorisation by using their own cards and accompanying him”, the prosecutors said. “During these unauthorised entries, [Macura] allegedly removed money from the vault, thereby obtaining an unlawful financial benefit of approximately 45bn dinars.”
---
Alta's parent company has faced scrutiny from the European Central Bank over suspected money laundering as part of an attempt to acquire an Austrian lender, Addiko, with the ECB questioning whether the bank could verify the legitimate origin of deposits. Alta had said the ECB found no wrongdoing.
Ljiljana Borovic, a Belgrade criminal defence lawyer, said that Alta had grown from a small money exchange office on the outskirts of Belgrade into a systemic bank after it acquired a Serbian state-owned lender and took on government business.
The bank was also the only one that catered to Russian businesses and individuals alike, growing its balance sheet after the arrival of tens of thousands of Russians following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
"The bank's rapid growth, the enormous increase in the number of its branches and offices, and the expansion of its operations into other business sectors and neighbouring countries within an exceptionally short period of time raised legitimate concerns among financial and banking experts," Borovic said.
The National Bank of Serbia and Vučić's SNS party did not respond to requests for comment. Macura has denied wrongdoing, telling the FT before his arrest that his bank was a target of “a sustained campaign of hostile briefing, leaks and insinuation”.
Austrian lender Raiffeisen Bank International, which had been selected to take over Addiko and sell some Addiko assets to Alta in a carve-out, said it “expects to remain owner of all of Addiko’s subsidiaries, including the one in Serbia” as it no longer expected Alta “to get regulatory approval”.
Central bank
---
OLAF STORBECK — FRANKFURT
PAOLA TAMMA — BERLIN
Brussels has given Eurozone governments just days to nominate candidates to be the next president of the European Central Bank, signalling that the race to find Christine Lagarde's successor could come to a head quickly.
Kyriakos Pierrakakis, president of the Eurogroup and Greek finance minister, called on the bloc's 21 member states to submit their nominations by Friday, a spokesperson for the body co-ordinating Eurozone policy said yesterday.
Lagarde announced last week that she will step down as ECB president on February 7, nine months before the end of her eight-year term.
The change in leadership at Europe's most powerful monetary authority comes as the region is in the throes of another wave of inflation and growing investor concern over the state of France's public finances and political stability in the run-up to its presidential elections in April.
Lagarde said last week that she wanted “greater freedom to express her views” on matters other than monetary policy. She has also been in talks with the World Economic Forum over becoming its next chair.
The ECB president and the five other members of its executive board are appointed by the leaders of the 21 countries that use the euro, after consulting with the European parliament and the ECB. A successful candidate needs the support of at least 16 countries representing 65 per cent of the euro area's population.
EU leaders, who will meet twice this month and again in December, are expected to make a decision before the end of the year on both Lagarde's replacement and two other seats on the executive board that will also become vacant in 2027.

Departing head: Christine Lagarde will step down on February 7
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel will leave to join the IMF in January, while the central bank's chief economist Philip Lane's eight-year term will expire in late May.
Pablo Hernández de Cos, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, and Klaas Knot, the former Dutch central bank governor, are seen as frontrunners to become the fifth ECB president from February.
Hernández de Cos is viewed as a more dovish economist while Knot has a hawkish reputation. However, people familiar with their views stress that both are pragmatists who are keen to forge consensus among policymakers and are not wedded to ideological positions.
After Germany last month signalled that it would not seek the ECB presidency, the odds on a surprise outside candidate to replace Lagarde widened.
But observers warn that new names could still emerge at the eleventh hour. According to people familiar with discussions in various capitals, France is eyeing the ECB chief economist role, seen as the second most important.

Inspiration is the power to look forward, to shape the unseen, turning the present into something iconic.
/ TOMORROW'S TIMELESS
SANLORENZO
---

INTERNATIONAL
Central bank
RBA's fifth increase this year comes as inflation remains above target
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Australia's central bank has raised interest rates to an 18-year high as it warned inflation remained above target in an economy grappling with high unemployment and a collapse in house prices.
The Reserve Bank of Australia yesterday opted to raise interest rates by 0.25 percentage points to 4.85 per cent, its fifth increase this year, as it said the inflation outlook was now “materially higher”, with fuel, commodities and AIrelated investments driving up prices. The bank said it did not expect inflation to drop into its target range of 2 to 3 per cent – which it has been above for two years – until late next year, three quarters later than previously forecast.
Official data released last week showed underlying inflation – which strips out volatile items such as fuel – hit 3.6 per cent in the year to September, a slight rise on the month before, while overall inflation was up 4.3 per cent.
RBA governor Michele Bullock told reporters the central bank's fifth rate rise in 2026 reflected a worsening inflation outlook. “I know this is not the news many Australians wanted to hear but it is what is needed,” she said.
Bullock added that high inflation affected everyone, not just mortgage holders. "This is the right thing for the Australian economy," she said.
The Australian dollar weakened as much as 0.35 per cent to under US\$0.70 following the announcement of the rise, which was widely expected, and was decided in a 6-3 vote.
The latest rate move, which arrived shortly before the start of the Melbourne Cup horse race, one of Australia's biggest annual sporting events, added to growing concerns about the health of the economy with house prices slumping and unemployment rising to 4.7 per cent last month.
It will also heap pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government, which has signalled that it is preparing to cut public spending next month. The government has repeatedly pointed to external factors, including the war in the Middle East, as key factors driving inflation. Paul Bloxham, chief economist at HSBC Australia, said there was “a risk the Australian economy tips into recession”, adding: “We put the risk at a 50-50 chance.”
Bullock said the central bank's baseline forecast did not foresee a recession but warned that, with house prices tumbling and unemployment rising, many Australians may perceive one had arrived. "I think that is going to make people feel like it's a recession because they feel poorer," she said.
Shane Oliver, chief economist at AMP, said the cumulative rate rises would increase annual mortgage interest payments for many homeowners by A\$6,600 (US\$4,610) a year. “We may be close to a tipping point for some mortgage holders,” he said in a note.
The rate move also put the RBA out of step with other central banks, such as the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, which opted to hold rates at recent meetings.
Bullock said the bank's aggressive strategy was needed to reduce excess demand in the Australian economy. She added the disparity between the RBA's inflation targets and monthly readings was broadly similar across different markets. "I wouldn't say we're completely Robinson Crusoe here," she said.
---


Sources: Cotality; FT calculations • \* Data for Brisbane includes Gold Coast. Data as of Oct 29 2026
Australia has experienced several house price corrections since 1980

Measures aimed at cooling demand risk tipping economy into recession, say economists
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Australia's attempt to fix its housing crisis in May included a tacit understanding that the measures would lead to a lowering in prices in one of the world's most expensive property markets as investors left the market.
Nearly six months since the authorities unwound incentives that had fostered a housing boom and against a backdrop of higher inflation and rising interest rates, the impact has been more severe than expected.
The country is facing its worst housing correction in 40 years, which some economists fear might turn into an economic crisis. “Since 1982 there have been nine price corrections in the Australian market but this current one is potentially the mother of them all,” said Barrie Harrop, a property developer since the 1970s.
House prices have fallen 5.2 per cent since March, when the government of Anthony Albanese ended tax breaks and a capital gains discount that benefited people who owned multiple homes, according to Cotality, a property research company.
Analysts predicted that prices would drop by between 5 and 10 per cent as houses lost their appeal as the main source of investment for many well-off Australians.
But some economists now project a peak-to-trough decline of up to 15 per cent by the end of next year.
The Reserve Bank of Australia yesterday raised interest rates for a fifth time this year after inflation hit 4.3 per cent in the year to September, up from 4 per cent in the year to August, well above its target range.
Shane Oliver, chief economist and head of investment strategy at AMP, said the rate rise would probably push the property price decline towards the 15 per cent level heading into next year and could increase the number of distressed sellers.
"Prices are being hit by a perfect storm of rate hikes, tax hikes on investors, poor confidence and poor affordability depressing demand," he said.
That is evident in the weekly auctions held across the country. Data from
The median value of houses in Sydney plunged by more than A\$82,000 in the three months to September
Brendon Thorne/Bloomberg
Cotality suggests that more homes are being put up for auction as the weather has become warmer but also that the number of listings was 40 per cent below the levels of last year.
Meanwhile, agreed sales have fallen below 50 per cent in three of the past four weeks across Australian cities.
Domain, a property listings company, said the steepest quarterly decline in house prices since the early 1990s was recorded in the three months to September.
The median value of houses in Sydney plunged by more than A\$82,000 (\$57,800) in that period.
Atypically, the house price decline hit capital cities in all states, ranging from A\$20,000 over the quarter in Darwin to almost A\$90,000 in Perth.
Morgan Stanley said Australia's housing market would suffer its biggest correction since 1982 if prices dropped by 12.5 per cent. That would rank alongside housing busts during the depressions of the 1890s and 1930s.
The bank also cut its forecast for GDP growth next year to 1.1 per cent from 1.4 per cent and predicted that unemployment would rise to 5.1 per cent from 4.7 per cent.
Stephen Koukoulas, managing director of Market Economics and a former adviser to the Labor government of Julia Gillard, said that lower house prices were “desirable” to improve affordability but warned of risks.
“Falling house prices are a big deal. I am as nervous as a cat in a room full of rocking chairs,” he said. “The government does not want a recession but each week it is getting closer.”
On the deteriorating economic conditions, he added: "People will be pissed off and they will blame someone."
Jim Chalmers, Australia's treasurer, has blamed rising interest rates for the slump and argued that buying a house is a long-term investment with modest price rises expected in the coming years.
He has, however, admitted that the government has “lost some political paint” and has started to signal potential public spending cuts ahead of a mid-year budget due next month.
Since the measures were introduced, Chalmers' net public approval rating has fallen by nine percentage points to
'Falling house prices are a big deal. Each week a recession is getting closer'
Stephen Koukoulas, Market Economics
minus 23 points in a recent poll by the Australian Financial Review.
The opposition Liberal Party has warned that many first-time buyers who took out loans to buy houses ahead of the tax changes are at risk of negative equity. Shadow treasurer Tim Wilson blamed Labor for the worsening economic outlook and, after last week's inflation figures, said that “Australians can barely to afford to keep their homes”.
Even trophy houses are not immune. Rothesay, a Gothic mansion dating to 1868, was sold last month for A\$12.8mn (\$9mn) only four years after its previous owner paid nearly A\$20mn, a then-record for the area.
The price slump also has implications for the construction industry. Harrop, the property developer, warned that tens of thousands of planned developments were no longer viable.
Harrop has fielded calls from developers looking to sell projects at a steep discount in recent weeks but said that the malaise could persist for at least another two years. "To say it is chaotic is an understatement," he said.
Wealthy expats
---
AMY KAZMIN — ROME
JAMIE JOHN AND JOSH SPERO — LONDON
Giorgia Meloni's plan to impose an "exit tax" on wealthy people who leave Italy risks driving away expatriates drawn to cities such as Milan over the past decade, experts have warned.
In its draft budget, the prime minister's coalition proposed a 26 per cent tax on paper profits accrued by people with assets of €800,000 or more who decide to leave Italy.
Private wealth lawyers warned that the move, if approved by parliament, would reduce Italy's attractiveness to the super-rich and discourage those already resident from remaining.
"It is a really significant move, and one that is going to have a lot of clients who have relocated there, or based there generally, very nervous," said Charlie Sosna, head of private wealth and tax at law firm Mishcon de Reya.
The exit tax, which Meloni's government said was aimed at the “super-rich”, would apply to people who were tax residents in Italy for six of the 10 years before their departure. It could be refunded if financial assets were not liquidated for some years after they left.
Over the past decade, Italy has tried to tackle the problem of departing wealth with tax incentives to encourage affluent professionals to stay and rich expatriates to settle there. Under its “flat tax” regime, expatriates moving to Italy pay a single annual levy on their total overseas assets and income for 15 years.
When the scheme began in 2017, the fee was fixed at €100,000 a year.
Rome has also offered tax breaks to newly arrived working professionals, including returning Italians, who pay income tax on just a portion of their salaries for five years. But in the past two years, amid an outcry over super-rich expats in Milan, Meloni's coalition has twice raised the flat tax, which is now levied at €300,000 a year.
“Clients were [already] anxious about a relocation to Italy as they saw it as unpredictable,” said Sosna. But with changes to the flat tax “and now the mention of an exit tax”, they are going to be “really considering their options”.
Rome will raise €3.7mn from the exit tax next year, rising to just over €6.7mn for the next four years, and then falling again to €3.4mn a year from 2032, as those who left can start to claim refunds.
Maurizio Fresca, a senior tax lawyer at Rome-based law firm Chiomenti, said many aspects of the proposal were ambiguous, including how it would relate to the flat tax and other incentive schemes – and whether it would apply only to assets held in Italy or worldwide.
Tim Stovold, head of tax at Moore Kingston Smith, said the proposal might encourage people to leave Italy before hitting the six-year residency threshold that would trigger a potential exit levy.
"It is going to make Italy a much less popular destination for individuals to make their long-term home," he said.
Italy's finance ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
Many other countries impose an exit tax on rich individuals who relocate. In the US, those with a net worth above \$2mn who give up their green cards or citizenship pay capital gains tax on the paper gains of assets across the world. See Lex
Peacekeepers
---
HEBA SALEH — CAIRO
UN peacekeepers are wrapping up a 35-year mission in Western Sahara after the Security Council failed to renew their mandate, in a development that analysts warned could lead to open conflict between Morocco and Algeria.
The mission's mandate expired on Sunday after the Security Council hit a deadlock on Friday when both the US and Russia presented competing resolutions, neither of which was adopted.
Russia vetoed a US proposal that would have ended any possibility of the UN mission organising a long-stalled referendum on Western Sahara's self-determination, in effect handing sovereignty to Morocco, which already controls much of the territory. Russia's resolution to extend the mission's mandate by a year failed to get enough votes.
While Morocco claims sovereignty over Western Sahara, Algeria hosts and backs the Polisario Front, a group fighting for independence for the territory.
“We are now in uncharted territory,” said Riccardo Fabiani, north Africa director at the International Crisis Group, who said the withdrawal of peacekeepers from a buffer zone meant a miscalculation by either side could more easily ignite a broader conflict.
Morocco and Algeria, which broke off ties in 2021, are arch-foes. Both have been building their militaries, with Algeria ranked Africa's biggest military spender and Morocco acquiring equipment from the US, Israel and France.
A spokesperson for UN secretary-general António Guterres said on Sunday that the peacekeepers' departure did not abrogate the local Sahrawi population's right to self-determination and Guterres was concerned about "the risk of escalation of hostilities".
Oubi Bouchraya Bachir, an adviser to Polisario leader Brahim Ghali, said the Front would “show self-restraint in the field” to allow for a political solution. Morocco’s King Mohammed VI said his country would abide by a ceasefire.
Football
---
AHMED AL OMRAN — JEDDAH
The Asian Cup football tournament that was due to be held in Saudi Arabia early next year has been postponed, as the Middle East braces itself for a renewed round of escalation in the Israel and US-Iran war.
The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) confirmed yesterday that the event would be delayed until December 2027, marking the latest event to be cancelled or rescheduled after a series of attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels targeting Riyadh airport and other civilian and energy infrastructure sites in Saudi Arabia.
The country's flagship “Davos in the desert” investment conference that was scheduled to take place in the capital last month was moved to next year after an attack on King Khalid International airport killed at least 12 people and wounded more than 300.
Formula 1 originally postponed its Saudi race from April to November after the start of the US-Israel strikes on Iran, but officials later said the kingdom's race would no longer take place.
The AFC and local organising committee said the decision to postpone the Asian Cup was “in light of the current exceptional circumstances arising from developments in the region, including substantial logistical complexities and travel disruptions”.
The organisers added: “Exceptional circumstances have been created for the organisation and delivery of the competition as originally scheduled, making the postponement necessary in the interest of all participating teams, officials, spectators and other stakeholders.”
Even before the Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia over the summer, a combination of security concerns and budgetary constraints had already forced the cancellation of several events in the kingdom, including the Red Sea International Film Festival and electronic music festival MDLBeast.
Security
---
PETER CAMPBELL, BARNEY JOPSON, RAPHAEL MINDER AND LAURA DUBOIS
Seven passenger aircraft across Europe were grounded and searched yesterday after a series of bomb threats received within hours of each other.
The authorities said the incidents were found to be hoaxes, but analysts warned airlines should brace for more threats in the coming days as part of what could be a co-ordinated attempt to disrupt aviation across the region.
A Ryanair flight from Manchester received a bomb threat while en route to Murcia in Spain and was quickly evacuated and swept for explosives on landing, while a flight by Polish airline LOT from Heathrow was diverted and forced to land at Warsaw's Modlin Airport for searches. The Warsaw airport was briefly closed but has since reopened.
Also yesterday, an SAS flight from Copenhagen to Warsaw's Chopin Airport, a Wizz Air flight from Bergamo to Sofia, another flight to Sofia from
Dublin and two Ryanair services landing at Rome Fiumicino were searched after separate threats were received. One of the Ryanair flights was escorted by Italian fighter jets while landing.
The incidents, which have not been officially linked, come the day after a Wizz Air flight from Luton was forced to land in Budapest after receiving a bomb threat. Two weeks ago, an Austrian Airlines flight from Israel was also forced to land at Sofia after receiving a threat that turned out to be false.
So far, none of the authorities that searched the planes reported finding any evidence of devices or explosives.
Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, a transport spokesperson for the European Commission, said: "It is too early to draw conclusions on whether the reported incidents are linked. National investigations remain ongoing."
Osprey, an aviation security group, told clients yesterday: "There is a realistic possibility of further bomb threats targeting aviation in the near term."
Big chill Officials assess dangers to Europe's food security after latest wave of cyber attacks on supermarket freezers ➕ PAGE 11
---
\- Engineer duped into malware attack
NIKOU ASGARI — LONDON
JILL R SHAH — NEW YORK
Binance said the attackers who stole \$6.3bn from the crypto exchange last week set up fake job interviews to trick a software engineer at the company into installing malicious code, as it laid out findings from a probe into the heist.
"It was not a single isolated breach or a simple phishing incident. The attackers combined a range of techniques, including . . . fake recruitment interviews, malicious software downloads" and other methods, Binance said yesterday.
The FBI has blamed TraderTraitor, a group of hackers linked to North Korea, for the biggest heist on record. The attack came as advances in artificial
---
intelligence have driven an increase in such hacks in crypto, revealing vulnerabilities in blockchain technology.
Binance's findings also underscore the significant role of human error in allowing the hackers to gain access to the exchange's systems.
The company said that in June one of its engineers had downloaded a tampered software program. This was detected by Binance's systems and the engineer's device was replaced, but not before the engineer's "role and his related colleagues on our wallet infrastructure team [had been] exposed to the hacker", it said.
In September, a second Binance engineer was contacted through a job-hunting platform by a person claiming to be a project director at what turned out to be a fake company. The engineer took part in what they thought was a job interview, during which the interviewer shared their social media profile “in order to build trust”, Binance said. It said the episode was “more advanced and deceptive than previously seen social engineering approaches”.
At a second interview with a person claiming to be the CEO of the fake company, which took place over a social chat app, the interviewer instructed the engineer to download an interview assignment, which contained malicious code. This download went undetected and allowed the attackers to use Binance's internal AI tools to gain control over some of the exchange's systems.
"The malware employed sophisticated obfuscation and evasion techniques, including replacing a legitimate development tool component with a malicious version to execute commands and establish communication with an attacker-controlled external server," Binance said.
With the malware in place, attackers used the engineer's compromised laptop and a Binance AI tool to control the laptops of the first and a third engineer. The first engineer had the ability to publish code, which the hackers used to their advantage.
On October 29, the day of the hack, the attackers logged on to the third engineer's laptop and "triggered a malicious script to launch the attack". Binance said it had since rebuilt its wallet systems and AI tools, and was working with external cyber security experts to strengthen its security systems.
Binance co-chief executive Yi He said that this year the company had detected and neutralised 57 suspected North Korean cyber threats. "We intercepted many of them, but the cost of failing to stop even one was severe – and this should never have happened," she said. Laundering process page 13
Deal cleared Chinese retailer JD.com to buy Ceconomy after state subsidy ruling by EU

A MediaMarkt store in Germany. The retail chain is one of two brands operated by Ceconomy — Imke Lass/Bloomberg
ANDY BOUNDS — BRUSSELS
FLORIAN MÜLLER — FRANKFURT
JD.com's €2.2bn acquisition of German electronics retailer Ceconomy has been cleared by the European Commission following an investigation in which Brussels determined the Chinese ecommerce group had benefited from state subsidies.
The Commission said yesterday that JD.com had made commitments “which fully and effectively remedy the distortion resulting from the identified foreign subsidies”.
The deal is the first time a Chinese takeover of a European company has been assessed using the EU's foreign subsidy regulation, at a time of trade tensions between the two sides. China had threatened retaliation if the deal was blocked. It comes weeks after Brussels and Beijing agreed to limit Chinese hybrid vehicle exports to the EU to tackle a widening trade deficit.
JD.com, China's largest retailer with annual revenue of \$187.2bn last year, launched its bid for Ceconomy, which operates more than 1,000 stores across Europe under the MediaMarkt and Saturn brands, in July last year.
The Commission said yesterday that JD.com had used preferential financing, tax incentives and grants from Beijing to develop logistics and technological knowhow that would allow Ceconomy to undercut its competitors.
JD.com has pledged to provide technology and logistics, including warehousing, to other retailers on the same terms as Ceconomy. It has also committed to conducting intragroup transactions, including financing, on market terms. The commitments last for 10 years.
EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera said this would prevent “cross-subsidisation of the parties’ European operations”. She added: “Consumers benefit from a competitive retail and ecommerce sector, with a level playing field for companies."
The closure of the deal comes about five months behind the companies' target completion date and a week before a hard "long-stop date", after which either party had the right to walk away if all regulatory clearances had not been obtained. Ceconomy shares rose 2.7 per cent yesterday.
JD.com chief Sandy Xu said: "Our goal is to support Ceconomy in accelerating its growth sustainably, further strengthening its competitive position in Europe and continuously driving innovation in an evolving retail market."
Remko Rijnders, chief executive of Ceconomy, said: “Customers will benefit from a wider selection, including faster deliveries, as well as access to exciting new technologies that will help bring innovations to market more quickly.”
---
LEE HARRIS — LONDON
ANTOINE GARA — NEW YORK
Mark Walter has explored a sale of \$71bn-in-assets insurer Delaware Life following a federal probe into the billionaire financier's investment empire.
Walter has weighed selling the insurer in a deal that could form part of a broader restructuring of his holding company TWG Global, according to three people familiar with the matter. The planning was at an early stage and might not result in a deal, the people said.
“TWG is not running a sales process for Delaware Life, nor has TWG retained external advisers, legal or financial, to advance a sale,” the company said in a statement.
“TWG has also not approached bidders about a possible sale. We remain focused on TWG’s commitment to the affiliated investments reduction plan, and we are pleased that the plan continues to progress.”
Delaware Life did not respond to a request for comment.
A sale would be the latest in a series of disposals by the chief executive of investment firm Guggenheim Partners. Walter has rushed to raise cash since a probe by US prosecutors revealed \$16bn in misclassified private investments at Delaware Life and billions more at another insurer he controlled.
Walter has struck deals in recent months to sell his stakes in the Los Angeles Lakers basketball team and London's Chelsea Football Club. His TWG Global stated that the Lakers sale was not part of a “fire sale” and had denied wrongdoing.
Delaware Life had \$71bn in assets under management as of June, according to the company, and more than 380,000 active annuity and life insurance policies.
"He may be forced to sell it at some point, so he's trying to get ahead of it," one of the people said of plans to sell down TWG's controlling stake in Delaware Life.
Walter has faced growing pressure on his businesses since Delaware Life and Clear Spring Life and Annuity, both of which he controls through TWG, revealed in June that they had received subpoenas in connection with an investigation by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
TWG said in August that Walter's insurers planned to "promptly eliminate all of the affiliate exposure".
---
BUSINESS INSIGHT
EUROPE
John
Gapper

ocation matters in logistics, as the view from halfway up one of the 16 tall cranes at London Gateway shows. The Thames flows by on one side, a huge
Tesco distribution centre rises in the distance, and a fifth cargo ship berth is being built. This will soon become the UK's largest container port.
Most ports are historic but London Gateway is new. Perched on the north bank of the Thames Estuary 25 miles east of the capital where a Shell oil refinery used to be, it started construction in 2010. It expects to overtake Felixstowe in Suffolk by 2028 as it draws the biggest ships from China and Asia, loaded with steel boxes.
Dubai Ports World has invested £3bn since inheriting the project as part of its £3.9bn takeover of the ports and ferries group P&O 20 years ago. The scale of the Emirati group's ambition is obvious as one turns off the A13 and drives past the Essex town of Stanford-le-Hope. Pot-holed roads recede and 1,500 acres of development appear.
The Abidjan, owned by the world's largest container shipping group MSC, was being unloaded when I visited last week, before it sailed on to Rotterdam. Its containers were lifted by Chinese 138-metre-high cranes before being moved on electric shuttles to automated stacking cranes. The cranes hoisted the steel boxes again, placing them on the rear of waiting trucks.
London Gateway was a big bet on the adage if you build it, they will come. In this case, DP World had to persuade container carriers plying global routes from Asia to Europe to put in there, rather than Felixstowe or Southampton. Although the nearby port of Tilbury handles some containers, it is not deep enough for the world's largest ships.
DP World, which operates a container terminal at Southampton, also had to reverse the 60-year tide away from London. Inner London's docks and wharves declined in the 1960s amid the move from dry-bulk cargo to containers. Felixstowe became the main gateway port into the UK, despite being 90 miles from the capital.
But the decision to build a modern, deep-water port on
deep-water port on an expanse of brownfield Thames-side land is working. London Gateway pulled closer to Felix-stowe last year when Gemini, a
The port expects to overtake Felixstowe as it draws the biggest ships from China and Asia, loaded with steel boxes
global shipping alliance of Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, moved its Asia to Europe traffic there. After the fifth berth opens next year and a sixth by 2030, it will employ 1,600 people.
“Felixstowe has been the UK’s primary port for decades but it is slowly losing its crown,” says Eirik Hooper of the maritime consultancy Drewry. Felixstowe is owned by CK Hutchison, the Hong Kong-based conglomerate, and Southampton by Associated British Ports, the UK’s largest operator. The Australian group IFM Investors took a majority stake in ABP last month, valuing it at £10bn.
London Gateway has been helped by a surge in imports as Chinese-made electric vehicles take a larger share of the UK market. Cars usually travel on roll-on/roll-off ferries but demand is now so high that they are being packed in containers. The number of deep-sea containers handled by UK ports last year rose by 12 per cent, with most of the increase in London.
The port's allure is a matter of logistics as well as location. There is an adjacent logistics park for companies such as Tesco and UPS to bring goods straight into their facilities. Modelled on the Jebel Ali free zone in Dubai, it is a barrier to competition. If customers of shipping companies want them to dock there, it is hard to switch.
Britain's trade imbalance means most of the containers leaving the port are empty. London Gateway must find places to store them temporarily around the port before they can be shipped out to Asia again. It is now building an automated facility to stack 27,000 units 16 high to reduce congestion, part of an investment it expects to reach £4bn by 2030.
The port depends on logistics beyond its gates. About a third of the containers leaving are carried by train, but this was disrupted by a freight train derailment on the day I visited. Local roads are visibly ageing. “It’s not the best, although it is also not the worst,” Kris Adams, chief executive of DP World’s UK ports, observed diplomatically of Britain’s transport network.
But the UK is an attractive export market and London Gateway is in a good position. There are signs of more ships, such as the Abidjan, stopping there before heading on to European ports, rather than the other way round. Once they come, keep building.
john.gapper@ft.com
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (2026 REVISION)
NOTICE OF DISSOPTION APPLICATION
SAAO GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY LIMITED AND/OR ANY INFORMATION CONTACT THE "COMPANY"
GRAND COURT CAUSE NO. FSD0089 of (2014) (MRHCJ)
TAKE NOTICE THAT, by way of Summons, the Joint Official Liquidators of the Company shall not be entitled to the Grand Court of California for an order that the Company shall be dismissed pursuant to section 152 of the Companies Act (2026 Revision) ("the Dissolution Application"). The Company shall not be entitled to seek that the Dissolution Application is intended to seek that the Dissolution Application be dealt with by the Court administratively, i.e., on the papers without the need for a formal hearing, and should not be intended to seek that any remainder of the Company intends to object to the Dissolution Application being dealt with administratively and/or who intends to appear or otherwise be heard by the Court. The Company shall not be entitled to seek that the Dissolution Application of their intention to do so by 27 November 2026, along with the Details of the Directors' views relating to contacting the Joint Official Liquidators using the details provided below.
Dated 4 November 2026
August Madkins, Joseph J. J. Legal Liquidator
Contact for Enquiries:
Michal Segal
Email: michal.legal@j.dcg.com
(34) 545 526 8905
Address for Service:
Grant Thornton Specialist Services (Cayman) Limited
All the Chief Executive Yard, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY-14006,
Cayman I Bandis
---
Calls to the Financial Times Advertising Department may be monitored.
Acceptance of any advertisement for publication will be subject to the then current terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications.
A copy of the terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications can be obtained from +44 (0)20 7873 3000, or viewed at www.FT.com/ advertising
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (2026 REVISION)
NOTICE OF DISOLUTION APPLICATION
SAAD INTERNATIONAL BANK LIMITED
(BN JOURNAL ASSOCIATIONS) (CHINA GRAND)
GRAND COURT CAUSE NO. FSD0090 of 2014 (MRHCJ)
TAKE NOTICE THAT, by way of Summons, the Joint Official Liquidators of the Company shall not be issued to the Grand Court of Bayern, Inc. for an order that the Company shall be dissolved pursuant to section 152 of the Companies Act (2026 Revision) (the "Dissolution Application"). AND FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, the Company shall not intend to seek that the Dissolution Application be dealt with by the Court administratively, i.e., on the papers without the need for a formal hearing, and should not be intended to seek that the Company shall not intend to object to the Dissolution Application being dealt with administratively and/or who intends to appear or otherwise be heard by the Court. The Company shall not be able to contact the Joint Official Liquidators of their intention to do so by 27 November 2026, along March 31th, in relation to the President's contact to contacting the Joint Official Liquidators using the details provided below.
Dated 4 November 2026
Margot Mackinson, Joseph J. Chief Financial Liquidator
Contact for Enquiries:
Michal Segal
Email michal.segal@ajcgj.com
(84) 526-8955
Address for Service:
Grant Thornton Specialist Services (Cayman) Limited
Berkshire, Department of Treasury, Ward, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY-9006,
Cayman Islands
---
ceutical conglomerate Bayer and the New York Yankees baseball team.
While Apollo has been willing to lend billions against AI chips, some of its rivals have been reticent to follow it into the nascent market. Ares Management chief Michael Arougheti recently told his shareholders the firm had avoided lending money against AI chips because he did “not know how to underwrite the decline in depreciation curves on that type of technology.”
Some large commercial banks also fear becoming overexposed to individual technology giants in their loan books after a multitrillion-dollar borrowing binge, making them reluctant to lend more money over fears of growing overly reliant on any single customer.
While Apollo lent record sums in the third quarter, its quarterly results were mixed, with higher interest rates and heavy competition causing some of its activity to fall short of Wall Street forecasts.
Apollo wrote down its sprawling \$1tn investment portfolio by \$3.2bn to reflect the rise in interest rates, which hit the value of some of its fixed income and private equity investments. Spread profits at its vast insurance operations also declined because of higher funding costs from rising interest rates.
It also pulled back from writing new business at the unit due to intense competition that ate into potential profits. Quarterly inflows into the unit fell to \$19bn, the lowest figure this year.
Apollo is on track to attract about \$80bn in new insurance cash this year, roughly the same as last year.
The group recorded a net loss of \$1bn overall when accounting for markdowns to its debt portfolio, a temporary fluctuation in the accounting value of its portfolio that analysts often dismiss. Adjusted net income, used by analysts as a better proxy for its cash flows, was \$1.3bn, a bit worse than expected.

'Kill zone'
Rio Tinto acts
to halt cane
toad invasion
Cane toads threaten the biodiversity of the Pilbara region, where Rio operates, by diminishing the availability of food for indigenous species
Joshua Prieto/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
Rio Tinto is joining the battle against a marauding cane toad that is threatening to encroach on Australia's iron ore-rich Pilbara region and wreak havoc on the area's wildlife and economy.
The mining group will spend A\$28mn (\$20mn) working with scientists to turn a stretch of land between the Indian Ocean and the Great Sandy Desert in Western Australia into a “kill zone” to stop the march of one of Australia’s most destructive invasive species.
Cane toads do not pose a direct threat to Rio's iron ore mining operations in the Pilbara. However, the impact on the unique biodiversity of the region by endangering several species – including reptiles, ghost bats and mammals such as quolls and little red kalutas – would make future planning applications more difficult and increase compliance costs.
Tim Dempster, a marine biologist with Deakin University in Geelong, Victoria, said that the cost for mining companies to comply with environmental measures could rise significantly if action is not taken.
"The Pilbara is the heartland for Rio so it's the right thing to do, but it's an important thing to do for their business as well," he said. "It is the first time the toads are predicted to have a significant economic impact.
We have to plan for how the toads will shift the landscape and how companies can respond."
Six years ago Rio Tinto was scarred by international condemnation of its decision to blow up two 46,000-year-old caves sacred to Aboriginal people in Western Australia. Then chief executive Jean-Sébastien Jacques later told MPs that the “destruction of the Juukan rock shelters should not have occurred” and apologised unreservedly to the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura people.
The toads pose a cultural threat to the indigenous population of Australia as their spread has diminished the
availability of traditional food such as goannas that die after trying to eat the poisonous amphibians. There are now hundreds of millions of cane toads in the country, which are on track to reach Broome, on Western Australia's northern coast, in about two years and Pilbara by 2045.

In an effort to stop the invasion, a “kill zone” between Broome and Port Hedland is being created. Toads perish within days without access to water, so all 200 or so water sources used by cattle farmers in the 40km by 400km containment area will be made toad-proof. Dempster described the water sources as “stepping
MapLibre ©Mapcreator ©OpenStreetMap
Sources: FT research; sciencedirect.com; toadfree.zone stones for the toad invasion". Ben Phillips, a population biologist at Curtin University in Perth, said that the Rio partnership extended to the planning and management of creating the waterless border, which he compared with a "firebreak". "Rio do large infrastructure projects – the average ecologist doesn't," he said.
Chris Osborn, Rio Tinto's managing director of iron ore, rail, port and services, said 25 native species could be significantly threatened if the toads were not stopped. "Through our environment strategy we are working to protect the Pilbara's unique biodiversity," he said in a statement.
Rio is working with academics, farmers and the local indigenous community to establish and maintain the waterless barrier, which could provide lessons for turning back the toad in other areas.
“Most other approaches to invasive species have targeted the animal. This is about adapting the environment to make it uninhabitable for them. If we get it right then we won’t have to touch a toad,” Dempster said.
Cane toads were introduced almost a century ago to eat a beetle causing problems for sugarcane farmers in Queensland. The poisonous toads — native to South America — failed to eat many beetles but ate everything else. Nic Fildes in Sydney
Technology
MICHAEL ACTON — SAN FRANCISCO
Apple has warned that the “unprecedented” rise in memory chip prices and the cost of serving its AI tools would squeeze its margins even as it forecast better than expected sales for the crucial Christmas season.
Shares in Apple fell almost 2.5 per cent in lunchtime trading yesterday after the company warned of rising component costs and gave a weaker outlook for its high-margin services business.
Apple also predicted gross margins of 45 to 46 per cent in the fourth quarter of the year, less than analyst forecasts of 47 per cent.
The hit from the surging cost of memory chips overshadowed Apple's forecasts for iPhone sales for the holiday season.
Apple said that sales would rise between 7 and 10 per cent in the final quarter of this year, better than Wall Street forecasts of 6 per cent.
Chief executive John Ternus pointed to the shortage of memory chips as the boom in data centre building swallows up supply. "What we are seeing with memory pricing right now is unprecedented," he said.
Apple sales held up in the three months to the end of September, the final quarter of the company's financial
---
John Ternus, chief executive
year, with better than expected revenue of \$114.5bn.
Despite a record fiscal year for the company, investors were more focused on its financial outlook for the holiday season as consumers digest recent price increases and a rocky launch for the foldable iPhone Duo, which has been adversely affected by long delivery delays and reports of cracks in its screen. Apple insists the screen issues have affected only a limited number of devices.
Monday's earnings were also the first since Ternus, Apple's former hardware boss, took over as CEO in September. He has taken the reins when Apple's revenue growth is slowing from the robust pace set earlier in the year and as memory chip costs finally catch up with the consumer electronics group.
"I feel like it was a bit of a slow start for Ternus," said Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global's Visible Alpha. "The investment community is probably asking: Is this the best we can do for this level of valuation? Unfortunately, that happened to coincide with the new CEO's first earnings call."
Otto also noted that Apple's robust sales projections for the Christmas quarter appeared to be “priced to perfection” given worsening economic conditions and consumers facing a higher cost of living.
Apple reported solid performance in the third quarter, with iPhone revenue rising 17 per cent to \$57.6bn. Mac sales were better than expected at \$10.8bn.
Revenue for Apple's services business, which includes the App Store, Apple Pay and iCloud, was \$31.6bn, in line with estimates. However, it forecast services growth for the current quarter of between 8 and 9 per cent, well below the 12 per cent Wall Street expected. Net income was \$30.7bn.
Gross margin was 47.9 per cent in the third quarter, in line with its previous forecast of 47-48 per cent.
Healthcare
---
IVAN LEVINGSTON — LONDON
Carlyle and PAI have agreed to sell women's health business Theramex to private equity group Cinven in a deal worth €2.6bn, valuing it at almost double what the buyout groups paid for the company four years ago.
Carlyle and PAI acquired London-based Theramex, which specialises in areas such as menopause and osteoporosis, for about €1.4bn in 2022. They are jointly selling the business to Cinven, a statement released yesterday shows.
The deal valued Theramex at about €2.6bn, said people familiar with the matter, marking a strong return for its backers at a time when the private equity industry is struggling to offload assets within typical timelines.
Investors at the two companies said they had expanded Theramex's existing business, streamlined its supply chain and added new products, including via acquisitions, during their ownership.
“Women’s health is a bit of an overlooked segment in healthcare and a lot of pharma companies equate women’s health and contraception,” said Sébastien Veil, a partner at Paris-based PAI and head of its healthcare team.
“Within women’s health there are some segments like menopause, osteoporosis, endometriosis where there is a very strong social need . . . and at the same time a very significant unmet demand,” he added.
Theramex treatments span fertility, contraception and uterine health, with operations in more than 80 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. That includes providing hormone replacement therapy products for menopause symptoms.
"One part of the growth is us taking the franchise we had and doubling down and working within the market to grow the actual treatment and the diagnostic rate," said Lubna Qunash, a partner who leads European healthcare at Carlyle. "The second aspect was the successful launch of innovative new products."
The sale follows a string of European healthcare deals involving private equity groups in recent years. Those include CapVest's €10bn acquisition of German drugmaker Stada from Bain Capital and Cinven, and GTCR's €4.1bn takeover of Zentiva from Advent.
Cinven said Theramex was well positioned for further European and international growth, adding that women's health was a “structurally growing segment of speciality pharma, with significant populations still undiagnosed and undertreated”.
Pharmaceuticals
---
PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST — NEW YORK
Pfizer raised its profit and revenue outlook on the back of strong demand for medicines including cancer treatments and a blockbuster blood thinner, helping to offset sinking sales of the US drugmaker's Covid-19 products.
In third-quarter earnings yesterday, New York-based Pfizer said that it was expecting annual sales of between \$62bn and \$64bn, up from previous guidance of \$60.5bn to \$62.5bn, on rising revenue from non-Covid medicines.
The group also upgraded its forecast for adjusted earnings per share to between \$2.95 and \$3.05, up from guidance in August of between \$2.80 and \$3.
The upgrade makes Pfizer the latest pharma group to have lifted its outlook in recent days. Yesterday BioNTech – Pfizer's partner on its main Covid vaccine – raised the lower end of its revenue guidance despite falling vaccine sales. Obesity drugmaker Eli Lilly, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb all lifted their own revenue forecasts in earnings last week.
Pfizer is under pressure to find new sources of growth to offset slumping sales of the Covid jab that powered its earnings during the pandemic and has turned to acquisitions, including in oncology and obesity.
The company posted flat year-on-year revenue in the three months to the end of September as a 7 per cent rise in sales of non-Covid medicines offset a 29 per cent drop in revenue from its Comirnaty Covid shot and a 63 per cent fall in sales of antiviral pill Paxlovid, at constant exchange rates.
Pfizer's non-Covid medicines include blood thinner Eliquis, which brought in \$2.5bn in the quarter, boosted by higher net prices for the drug in the US. Revenue from its oncology drugs, including bladder cancer treatment Padcev, brought in \$4.3bn.
It acquired Padcev as part of its \$43bn acquisition of Seagen in 2023, giving it a portfolio of oncology medicines.
Pfizer is building its pipeline as it faces looming patent expiries between this year and 2030, including for Eliquis and breast cancer treatment Ibrance. Spending on research and development rose 18 per cent year on year.
Evan Seigerman, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said that Pfizer's results were supported by “commercial execution beyond Covid” and added: “Investors will be looking for evidence that the pipeline can help offset upcoming patent losses following recent mixed [trial results].”
COMPANIES & MARKETS
---
Officials weigh how to prevent further incidents after unidentified hackers ruin supermarket stock worth millions of euros

TOM WILSON — LONDON
LAURA DUBOIS — BRUSSELS
Freezers at dozens of supermarkets across Europe were targeted on Monday in the second spate of so-called freezer hacks in a month, leaving investigators questioning who would target the continent's frozen food in one of the most mysterious cyber attacks in recent years.
All told, incidents have been reported this week in almost 100 stores operated by a variety of retailers across Sweden, Finland, Ireland, Belgium, Luxembourg and Estonia.
The attacks, which saw hackers remotely turn up the temperature in refrigeration units to as high as 55C, followed a similar series of hacks targeting 700 supermarkets in France during one night in October.
The incidents, which ruined food worth millions of euros, have been described by EU officials as a deliberate assault on the continent's food security. Yet no group has claimed responsibility.
Attacks on industrial hardware, known in the cyber security industry as operational technology or OT, have been documented since the early 2000s.
However, such attacks have typically required specialised knowledge and been targeted at specific infrastructure in particular countries. Perhaps the most famous OT attack involved the US and Israel launching a piece of malware known as Stuxnet against Iran's nuclear programme in 2009.
Refrigeration units have been hit before. Last year, the US justice department accused a pro-Russian hacking group of disabling refrigeration systems at a meat-processing plant in California in November 2024. However, OT cyber security specialists say they have never seen hundreds of similar targets attacked at the same time.
Robert Lee, chief executive of cyber security company Dragos and a leading expert on OT attacks, said large language models had made it easier for hackers to access the expertise needed to target niche industrial hardware. Attackers were aided, he added, by the fact that more equipment was now connected to the internet to allow for remote operations.
“Adversaries have always wanted to go after OT,” he said. “It’s the changes we’ve made in our industry like connectivity and moving to homogeneous infrastructure as well as the advancements in adversary knowledge and capabilities that have opened the attack surface and made this possible.”
The attack was not technically complex. Hackers used known vulnerabilities to penetrate the systems that remotely control each unit's temperature.
Among the suppliers affected during the French attacks was Danfoss, a Danish company, which then told its customers to update hardware and software to patch a security gap in its control systems. Meanwhile, supermarkets were advised to update their internet security settings.
“Since we were aware of this vulnerability, the supermarket chains and all the cooling companies started to remediate the vulnerabilities, but not all shops yet made the necessary steps to have a secure internet connection,” said
Spoiled food at a retailer in Sweden following the latest freezer hacks on almost 100 European stores. Below: Ireland's Supervalu was a target of the attacks as well as an ICA supermarket in Stockholm, bottom Johan Nilsson/EPA/Shutterstock


Stephan Moelans, the chief executive of Belgian refrigerator company Sabcobel.
This allowed hackers to use “a backdoor to enter into the controller and change the settings of the cooling installations” in those retailers that were not using a secure internet connection, Moelans said. About 20 shops using his equipment were affected in the most recent hacks, including Carrefour, Spar and Delhaize supermarkets, he added.
The shops that had put up additional security measures, such as disconnecting from the public internet or using virtual private networks that shield the connection, had not been vulnerable despite the backdoor, said Moelans.
Danfoss confirmed that its systems were compromised and reiterated that it had told customers to disconnect systems from public IP addresses, update to the latest firmware and use “appropriate network protection”.
Blackstone-backed industrials company Copeland, which makes the Dixell brand, confirmed yesterday that “certain” monitoring systems used to control refrigeration at supermarkets were “impacted by the reported cyber security vulnerability” this week.
Following the French supermarket attacks in October, cyber security experts said the hackers might be anyone from disaffected western teenagers to a state-backed adversary with a strategic goal.
Whereas hacks of IT systems often leave some form of digital footprint, attacks on OT systems leave fewer traces, making attribution harder.
Tom Hegel, a cyber threat researcher at security group Sentinel, said he suspected that the attacks actually started in August with a series of hacks of freezers at several US military bases. Given the similarities, Hegel said the three sets of attacks were “very likely” associated with the same group and that the group was most likely linked to Russia.
The objective for Russia would be to cause deniable economic and psychological damage in Europe, he said. "It's a very affordable hack that has massive financial impacts to the targets," he continued. "This is something that anyone can pull off in terms of technical sophistication and capabilities yet has lasting financial and psychological impact."
Had the attacks been committed by a different group, Hegel would have expected them to claim responsibility either publicly or on private hacker forums. Russia, meanwhile, has increasingly adopted “ambiguity” as a tool of its cyber warfare, he said: “They want all of these nations to be confused about who could have done this and that creates domestic chaos, political chaos.”
The European Commission is set to debate the issue and EU food and agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen is set to meet retail group Ahold Delhaize to discuss the attacks.
"I will continue to follow developments closely and seek a comprehen-
---
sive overview of the preparedness plans retailers have in place to respond to such incidents," Hansen said.
KINDNESS & LEADERSHIP
Such equipment should be run on “a virtual network where systems can only communicate in a limited space”, he said, noting there were obvious challenges in sectors that lacked big cyber security budgets and technical expertise. “There is always a cost. You have to configure it, you have to maintain it.”
Miguel De Bruycker, head of Belgium's Centre for Cybersecurity, advised that companies in sectors such as retail, manufacturing and utilities should avoid connecting industrial equipment to the open internet.
The risk, however, had risen dramatically in the past six months, he continued. "Almost everyone is vulnerable and can be a victim of an attack." See Markets and Markets Insight
---
Financials
We encourage the leaders of today and tomorrow, no matter their role or background, to #LeadWithKindness
LEE HARRIS
Todd Boehly's insurer has built up more than \$3bn in lending linked to a Beverly Hills real estate project he is developing, highlighting the investor's use of policyholders' funds to finance his wider empire.
Boehly owns Security Benefit through his holding company Eldridge Industries, whose property affiliate Cain is a lead developer of One Beverly Hills, a residential, retail and hotel project in the Californian city.
Eldridge on Monday disclosed that as of September, Security Benefit had \$1.6bn in outstanding loans to Eldridge entities “supported by their holdings” in One Beverly Hills, along with \$1.4bn in project debt.
The investments represent an unusually concentrated bet by the \$67bn insurer and come amid growing regulatory scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest when insurers lend to businesses linked to their owners.
Andrew Granato, an insurance and securities law professor at the University of Texas, said it was striking that Security Benefit was investing in “an affiliated entity that also needs a vast amount of debt in order to conduct its own operations”.
Taken together, the loans are equivalent to roughly 4.5 per cent of Security
Benefit's \$67bn in admitted assets.
50 LEADING LIGHTS UK
Kansas, where the insurer is regulated, requires such a company to give regulators an opportunity to review certain investments if they exceed 3 per cent of its assets.
Regulatory filings show Security Benefit has lent more than \$1bn to five trusts that each own 20 per cent of OBH PE Investor, an entity affiliated with the insurer. The insurer said: "Security Benefit is well aware of the limitations that the Kansas Insurance Holding Company
Act places on entering into affiliated transactions, and we are in full compliance with those limitations and all other applicable laws and regulations."
---
One senior insurance lawyer told the FT that 3 per cent was “a magic number for regulators – whether you divide those up in five different [special purpose vehicles] doesn’t make any difference”.
Security Benefit declined to say whether the more than \$3bn in loans represented the full extent of its exposure to One Beverly Hills, or whether it had obtained regulatory approval for the investments.
The insurer, which last year counted more than 900,000 active policies and retirement accounts in force, has for years been one of the largest investors in affiliated assets – holdings linked to entities with ties to an insurer's owner.
Such investments have faced increased scrutiny since a federal investigation this year into Mark Walter, a longtime business partner of Boehly, revealed that insurers Walter controlled had misclassified more than \$20bn in affiliated private investments by stating they were unaffiliated.
Three industry analysts and one lawyer, who all asked not to be named, suggested the lending to OBH PE Investor through five trusts may have helped Security Benefit avoid triggering a regulatory review.
Its investments in One Beverly Hills include mortgage loans and so-called collateral loans, which are backed by other assets.
Collateral loans have faced criticism from regulators in recent months, with one state regulator describing the structure as a form of “capital arbitrage” that was “being actively exploited”.
Security Benefit is by far the largest user of collateral loans among US life insurers, accounting for almost half the industry's loans at the end of 2025.
---
Nevelina Aleksandrova, Lead Engineer, Public Library of Science (PLOS)
Dr Samreen Ashraf, Associate Head of Business School, Bournemouth University
Nathan Atkinson, Co-Founder, Rethink Food CIC
Surosh Azizi, Head of Finance, Gailarde
Tessa Baker, Professor of Cosmology, Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth
Jenny Barron, Director, EY
Roo Begom, Director, Committed Support
Christopher Box, Global Relationships Partner, PwC
Charlene Braithwaite, Student Disability & Wellbeing Officer, London College of Contemporary Music (LCCM)
Edward Brooks, Executive Director, The Oxford Character Project
Sharon Butler, Global Head of HR, Onnec
Kimberley Canning, Employee Experience Lead UK & IRE, Teleperformance (TP)
Katerina Chantzi, Facilitator & Organisational Development/ Learning & Development Consultant
Jenni Dunman, Founder & CEO, Daisy First Aid
Christina Dymioti, Founder, Fashion Heritage Network Cyprus
Cathy Elliott, Head of Streatham & Clapham High School, GDST
Bamidele Farinre, Agile Project Manager, Openclassrooms

Rebecca Henley, Senior Campaign Manager, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Tyler Hinkson, Partnership & Development Lead, TRIYBE
Darren Hopgood, Youth Football Coach, Harwell & Hendred Youth Football Club
Dex Hunter-Torricke, President, The Center for Tomorrow
Jacqueline Johnston-Fisher, Head of Services DJK House, Vitality Homes
Sana Kardar, Biomedical Scientist and Policy Innovator, House of Commons
Nicole Knott, Partner, PwC UK Pam Ledward, Director for Social Care Practice, Family Rights Group
Susie Ma, Founder and CEO, Tropic
Anne-Marie McBrien, Director of Faculty Services, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Jo Middleton, Director, International Institute for Canine Ethics
Koyesha Mukherjee, Founder and CEO, The Leading You(n)th
Dr Nitha Naqvi, Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist, Royal Brompton Hospital & Evelina London Children's Hospital part of GSTT (Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust)
Amy Nicholas, Director, Morgan's Butchery Ltd
Carolyn Pepper, Partner, Reed Smith LLP
Vince Pizzoni, Associate Professor, University of Nottingham
Flavia Popescu, Founder & CEO, The Manor of Oak
@kindnessrules\_
in @KindnessRules
kindnessrules.co.uk
Roxanne Potts, Chief Partnerships Officer, Inner Spark, Goyal Foundation
Dr James Punch, Positive Behaviour Support Lead, IBC Healthcare
Promila Raina, Youth Engagement Manager, Essex Cricket
Hayley Roffey, Co-CEO, Global Fund for Children
Nicola Rollock, Professor of Social Policy & Race, King's College London and Director of NIANRO Consulting
Sasha Samjic, Director and Therapeutic Lead, First Steps Care
Isaac Samuels, Head of Partnerships, Campaigns & Influence, People's Voice Media
Gillian Sandstrom, Associate Professor in the Psychology of Kindness, University of Sussex
Fiona Severs, Director of Community, Keystone Law
Ramsha Shahid, Partner, Privity Legal
Serene Singh, Welfare Officer, St Peter's College, University of Oxford
Julie Stephens, People Director, UK Insurance and Functions, Bupa
Carien van der Hoop, Global Lead, OTC Infrastructure, London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG)
Payal Walker, Founder & Co CEO, Women on Boards CIC
Sandra Wiggins, Founder & Co - CEO, Women on Boards CIC
Fareeha Zeshan, Chief Empowerment Officer, Million Smiles Global

UK COMPANIES
(No text to output)
Retail
---
Gordon Brothers chiefs will be brought before MPs for questions over demise
JIM PICKARD
DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR
Poundland's owners will be hauled before MPs within days to explain their role in the discount retailer's looming insolvency after the business select committee agreed yesterday to call in executives from distressed investor Gordon Brothers.
Labour MP Liam Byrne, chair of the influential committee, said it would kick off an inquiry into Poundland's demise, which has prompted ire across the political spectrum. The committee has written to Gordon Brothers summoning its executives for public scrutiny in the House of Commons.
"All the reports are that Poundland is a viable, profitable business, not a business to crash, burn, break off and sell off piece by piece," Byrne told the FT. "So we are asking Gordon Brothers to appear to clear up the mystery of what's stopping taking the deal on the table to save over 12,000 jobs."
Poundland last week filed a notice of intent to appoint administrators at the High Court, setting the stage for one of the biggest high street failures of recent years.
Gordon Brothers was accused by MPs yesterday of “predatory capitalism” and behaving like a “vulture” after turning down a rescue deal from Martin Property Group, a Northern Ireland-based real estate investor and developer.
In addition to the select committee hearing, business secretary Jonathan Reynolds will meet Gordon Brothers' executives within days.
Kate Dearden, a junior business minister, said that Reynolds had arranged a meeting with Gordon Brothers “to press our concerns and establish the facts”.
Dearden said the government wanted an outcome “that protects as many jobs as possible”.
The collapse of Poundland, which trades from about 600 stores, would represent a setback to Prime Minister Andy Burnham's pledge to revitalise the country's high streets. The likeliest outcome is chunks of the retailer's store estate are taken on by other retailers but that hundreds of shops close for good.
Gordon Brothers' insistence that bidders repay a £30mn loan in full diminished the chances of a rescue deal, according to people familiar with the matter. It inherited the loan from Poundland's previous owner when it bought the retailer for less than £1 last year.
Gareth Snell, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, said the investor was guilty of “predatory capitalism”.
Poundland was set up 36 years ago and became renowned for selling a range of items from plates to detergent at a uniform price of £1. The company, which has struggled with fierce competition and rising costs, reported an £85.2mn loss for the year to September 2025 on revenue of £1.5bn.
Gordon Brothers told the government it supported Poundland with “£85mn of additional financing” since buying it. It blamed factors including inflation, higher staffing costs and “severe levels of shoplifting” for its plight.
Gordon Brothers did not respond to a request for comment. Additional reporting by Laura Onita in London
Energy
---
RACHEL MILLARD
Drax and Brookfield have announced plans to develop vast data centre capacity at the energy group's wood-fired power station in North Yorkshire with Qatari backing.
The arrangement could see Drax's biomass plant powering AI models by next decade, although initially the electricity would come from the broader grid through an existing connection.
The UK energy group and the Canadian infrastructure investor Brookfield said they were joining forces to try to get up to 100 megawatts of data centre capacity up and running by 2028, increasing to 500MW by 2031 and up to 1 gigawatt in the 2030s.
The second phase would bring the data centre “behind-the-meter”, meaning it would take electricity directly from the biomass plant. The plans were likely to require investment of up to £2.5bn in its first phase and up to £20bn in total, Drax said.
A joint venture between Brookfield and Qai, a subsidiary of the Qatar Investment Authority, will provide initial investment for the project. Brookfield's UK AI platform Radiant will develop the project with Drax.
London-listed Drax has been looking for revenue to replace its current government subsidies, which are provided on the basis of biomass being a renewable source of electricity. The government extended the backing last year to 2031 on the basis that the Drax plant was needed to maintain the UK's "near-term security of supply" for electricity.
Data centre developers are looking to set up in the UK but have challenges accessing sufficient power supplies and land – both of which Drax can offer.
The government wants to attract data centres and announced in last week's Budget a “covenant” aimed at helping large projects get up and running.
The Drax and Brookfield partnership is at an early stage: the companies will need to secure government approvals as well as a data centre tenant for the site.
Drax's chief executive Will Gardiner said the project would "help secure the long-term future of the site and protect hundreds of jobs".
Drax shares closed up 6.6 per cent yes- terday.

---
Virgin Media O2 has lost more than 55,000 customers this year, having shed 138,400 last year. The broadband provider employs about 16,000 people glosszoom/Alamy
Virgin Media O2 is to cut thousands of jobs and slash spending as the UK telecoms group moves to ease investor concerns over a £22bn debt pile.
The UK's second-largest broadband provider said yesterday that it would cut £300mn in staff costs by 2029, equivalent to about 30 per cent of the total, as part of a wider £800mn cost-cutting programme.
VMO2, which employs about 16,000 people, declined to comment on how many jobs would be cut.
The move comes after the telecoms group, which is jointly owned by Liberty Global and Telefónica, was rocked by a sell-off in its bonds in the summer over concerns that fierce price competition from small fibre network operators was hitting its ability to service its debt.
The price of VMO2's safest debt was trading at about 71 pence in the pound on Monday, down from about par at the beginning of the year.
Some of the group's riskier debt – about £1.7bn of complex credit instruments called vendor financing notes – reached the equivalent of 41 pence in recent weeks.
Lutz Schüler, chief executive, said the “tough” decisions were necessary for the company’s “future success and growth”.
“Given the market conditions we face, the regulatory backdrop in fibre and the technological changes sweeping across all areas of the
---
economy, standing still and doing what we've always done is not an option," he said.
The FT reported in September that VMO2's owners were targeting hundreds of millions of pounds in cost cuts in a bid to ease investor concerns over the company's finances.
The cuts were announced yesterday alongside VMO2's third-quarter results, which showed the company lost 23,000 broadband customers between July and September.
The company has now shed more than 55,000 customers this year, having lost 138,400 last year.
VMO2 also confirmed an FT report from last week that it would scrap a planned upgrade of its cable network to newer fibre technology to cut spending.
James Ratzer, an analyst at New Street Research, said the new cost-cutting measures were “simply a necessity to try to stand still against competitors given the pressures on broadband pricing”.
In addition to the cuts, VMO2 said it would be exploring opportunities to use other companies' broadband networks in areas its own 19mn infrastructure did not reach.
The FT reported last week VMO2 was in advanced talks with BT over a deal to use its 25mn home fibre network. The company did not comment on the talks yesterday. Kieran Smith in London
Retail
---
LAURA ONITA AND ASHLEY ARMSTRONG
Asda has appointed David Potts, the former boss of rival Wm Morrison, as chief executive to turn round the fortunes of the UK's third-largest supermarket.
Potts joined the Leeds-based grocer with immediate effect yesterday, succeeding retail veteran Allan Leighton, who becomes non-executive chair after almost two years leading the business.
Leighton said Potts's experience was "exactly what we now require for the next stage of our transformation", adding that Asda had "stabilised" under his own leadership.
The group, which was bought by private equity firm TDR Capital and the billionaire Issa brothers in a £6.8bn deal agreed in 2020, has struggled with falling sales and widening losses while ceding market share to larger rivals Tesco and J Sainsbury as well as discounters Aldi and Lidl. It has also been weighed down by a heavy debt burden since its leveraged buyout.
Potts, who has spent the bulk of his career at Tesco, said he would draw on a “lifetime [of] experience” to run the supermarket chain, acknowledging that Asda had been through “a challenged moment”. “Our job is to listen to what
---
customers want," he told the FT.
customers want, he told the FT.
The news comes amid heightened speculation over consolidation in the fiercely competitive UK grocery industry. The FT reported last month that Sainsbury's and Morrisons held merger talks this year, before the former walked away. Industry executives have said that the possibility of a union between Asda and Morrisons should not be discounted.
Potts's "excellence in operational execution" would be a good fit with Leighton's "pizzazz", according to a person close to the recruitment process.
Since returning to Asda as executive chair in November 2024, Leighton has sought to restore its value credentials by investing heavily in price cuts while improving product availability, store standards and the overall shopping experience.
There have been tentative signs of recovery under his tenure. Like-for-like sales excluding fuel rose 0.2 per cent in the seven weeks to August 18 — the first growth in more than two years, according to the company.
But the recovery remains fragile. Sales fell 0.5 per cent in the 12 weeks to October 4, while market share slipped to 11.5 per cent from 11.8 per cent a year earlier, according to data from Worldpanel by Numerator.
Asda's problems have been compounded by a botched separation of its IT systems from former owner Walmart, which disrupted product availability and delayed its turnaround.
“David’s record in the industry speaks for itself, and having recently worked with [some of the] Asda executive team and other colleagues, I know he will quickly make an impact,” Leighton said.
Retail & consumer
---
LAURA ONITA — LONDON
Unilever has unveiled plans to cut a further €1bn of costs and changes to its operating model as the maker of Dove soap seeks to convince investors the separation of its food business has set the stage for faster growth.
The consumer goods group said yesterday that it planned to make productivity savings of €1bn by the end of 2029 by cutting “stranded costs” arising from the spin-off and making savings through “organisational simplification, process redesign and technology initiatives”.
Unilever will provide investors with more details of its plans at an investor day today.
Last year, the FTSE 100 company's board abruptly replaced former chief executive Hein Schumacher with its chief financial officer, Fernando Fernandez, after losing patience with the pace of his turnaround.
Since taking the top job, Fernandez has agreed a \$66bn deal to combine Unilever's food division with spice maker McCormick, uniting Hellmann's mayonnaise and French's mustard into one portfolio.
Activist investor Nelson Peltz, a Unilever shareholder who joined the company's board in 2022, spent years
---
agitating for a break-up of the conglomerate.
The deal, which is expected to complete by the middle of next year, received a lukewarm reception from investors when it was announced in March.
Fernandez has since promised a “sharper, more focused” group centred on beauty, personal care and home care.
Unilever said yesterday that it would operate under the principle of “global strategy, local execution" with a focus on simplifying processes across its business. A "lean" central function will be supplemented by local teams more accountable for their performance.
The group will prioritise faster-growing beauty and wellness brands and markets such as India and the US.
The new cost-cutting target comes after Unilever hit its previous goal, set in 2024, of achieving €800mn of annual savings by the end of 2026.
The company said that it expected its results in 2027 to be in line with its medium-term target for annual underlying sales growth of between 4 and 6 per cent, underlying volume growth of at least 2 per cent and modest improvement in its underlying operating margin.
Analysts at RBC Capital Markets said the targets for volume and sales growth were challenging but largely expected by the market. “We don’t expect a significant share price reaction from the [capital markets day] if this is the shape of what is to come,” they added.
Oil & gas
---
NIC FILDES — SYDNEY
Shell will sell its stake in Australia's largest gasfield to the investment arm of Abu Dhabi's national oil company for \$1.45bn as part of a strategy to shed its mature assets.
The Anglo-Dutch oil major said yesterday that it had agreed to sell its 16.7 per cent share of the North West Shelf project to XRG, the energy investment arm of Adnoc.
"The sale realises value from a mature, non-operated asset and supports Shell's strategy by focusing investment on advantaged integrated gas positions, as NWS transitions in the future towards a third-party toll-processing model," said Cederic Cremers, head of Shell's integrated gas operations.
Shell has been an investor in the North West Shelf, which is operated by Woodside Energy and sits off the coast of Western Australia, since the 1960s. The offshore gasfield has helped Australia become one of the world's most significant energy exporters, with much of the shipments going to trading partners in the Asia-Pacific region.
Shell put its North West Shelf stake on the block this year after selling out of Browse, another Woodside offshore gas project under development, in 2023.
The sale is part of Shell's strategy to offload mature assets. It also reflects the North West Shelf's transition to processing gas for third-party companies from its liquefied natural gas terminal in Karratha.

The North West Shelf stake will be sold to Adnoc's investment arm
XRG signalled its interest in Australia's energy market when it made a failed \$18.7bn bid for Santos, the country's second-largest oil and gas developer, last year. The company was established by Adnoc in 2024 to acquire international assets in gas, chemicals and low-carbon energy.
"This investment advances XRG's strategy to build a leading international gas business serving growing demand across Asia-Pacific," said Mohamed Al Aryani, president of XRG International Gas.
The Australian government approved an extension of the North West Shelf project to 2070 last year, which angered environmental groups.
Chevron, BP and Japan's Mitsui and Mitsubishi are also shareholders in the project.
Last month Infineum, a UK-based chemicals group backed by Shell, said it was exploring an \$8bn sale as the energy major tried to refocus on its core oil and gas operations by offloading more peripheral parts of its business.
COMPANIES & MARKETS
Crypto. Blockchains
---

NIKOU ASGARI — LONDON
North Korean hackers are expected to take months to launder the billions of dollars of tokens they stole last week from crypto exchange Binance, say analysts, despite using sophisticated automation in an attempt to hide their tracks.
The FBI has blamed the heist on TraderTraitor, a hacker group linked to the secretive state, saying it expected the stolen assets to be widely laundered before being cashed out. Of the \$6.3bn initially stolen, about \$3.3bn remains under the group's control after some tokens were frozen.
Although the thieves began laundering the stolen crypto immediately and are using automated tools to carry out thousands of transactions, cryptotracing experts say the process will take months or longer.
The stolen tokens are visible to law enforcement on public blockchains, but the hackers are embarking on a long and complex process to shift them in small quantities through numerous venues as they try to make tracing the flow of funds as difficult as possible.
"This is going to be weeks, months and maybe even years . . . They will sit on them for a long period of time and try to identify opportunities to cash out," said Phil Larratt, senior director of global services at Chainalysis, a blockchain-tracing company that is working with Binance.
Jonathan Levin, co-founder of Chainalysis, said the hackers had “too much money for their trusted laundering venues to handle”, so the funds were being broken down into smaller chunks and sent “to a wider network of services”.
Key to the laundering effort are decentralised finance lending markets and crypto swapping services – used to swap one type of crypto for another without owners having to sell any tokens – which the hackers are using to convert the stolen tokens into other assets. They are using sophisticated automation methods to split up and send the funds to thousands of new wallets in an attempt to speed up the movement of money and make tracing harder.
The Tron blockchain, created by crypto mogul and Donald Trump donor Justin Sun, is regarded as an important tool for money launderers. The Anti-Money Laundering Network has called Tron “a notorious platform for sophisticated money laundering schemes”, favoured by criminals because of its “high-speed transactions and low fees”.
Analytics company Elliptic said each dollar's worth of tokens that the hackers laundered through Tron had already moved nine times by the weekend, underlining the scale of the operation. At the height of the activity on Saturday, one transaction was sent every three seconds, it said.
Experts said that conventional software automation was being used, rather than agentic AI. "It looks like scripts run by people," said Tom Robinson, cofounder of Elliptic, and that there had been "pauses that looked like human working patterns".
Binance is still investigating how the
The path of the money stolen from Binance Estimated flows between Oct 29 and Nov 2\* hackers managed to compromise its systems, but yesterday revealed that the attackers had set up fake job interviews to trick a software engineer into installing malicious code on its systems. It is also working with the FBI and blockchain analytics companies to trace the funds.

\* Figures may not sum between start and end dates due to fluctuation in crypto/USD exchange rates \*\* Swapped for ETH through DEXs and lending protocols; swapped for TRX through DEXS, then bridged
Source: Elliptic, data as at Nov 2, 7am
One way the hackers are seeking to hide the source of funds is by converting them into other tokens through decentralised finance platforms.
So-called DeFi platforms are unregulated and often involve automated contracts carrying out functions such as lending and borrowing, rather than traditional intermediaries such as banks and brokers. Diehard crypto enthusiasts relish the fact that DeFi protocols have little oversight and many do not require customers to submit to identity checks.
For example, minutes after the theft, the hackers had swapped \$434mn worth of USDT for ethereum on decentralised exchanges and borrowed \$45mn worth of ethereum against stolen USDT posted as collateral on the decentralised lending platform AAVE, according to Elliptic.
They used another decentralised exchange called SunSwap to convert \$234mn of USDT into TRX, the native token of the Tron blockchain.
About \$215mn worth of TRX tokens were split up and sent to about 7,700 newly created crypto wallet addresses, Elliptic said. On the way, some of the TRX was swapped for USDD, a stable-coin created by Sun in 2022 that bills itself as “freeze-free”, meaning that, unlike Circle and Tether’s stablecoins, no one can freeze it.
The hackers then used so-called cross-chain bridges including THOR-Chain and Bitget Swap to convert those funds into ethereum. Cross-chain bridges move assets from one blockchain to another by taking the token on
Crypto assets displayed on the Binance app. The exchange is working with the FBI and blockchain analytics companies to trace the stolen funds — SeongJoon Cho/Bloomberg

Our global team gives you market-moving news and views, 24 hours a day ft.com/markets
the first blockchain and paying it out in the form of new tokens on the destination blockchain. At least \$147mn had been bridged out of Tron, Elliptic said. It currently sits in hundreds of new crypto wallets.
To cash out, the hackers will eventually use crypto exchanges or brokers that carry out no customer checks.
Last year, the FBI blamed TraderTraitor for a \$1.5bn theft from crypto exchange Bybit in what was at the time the biggest ever crypto hack.
"The funds will probably be cashed out in similar ways to Bybit and earlier North Korean hacks, through [over-the-counter] brokers, often Chinese-language traders," said Robinson of Elliptic, adding that such services asked "little or no questions" of their customers.
The stolen Bybit funds were eventually converted into USDT and then cashed out, with the hackers paid in traditional currencies. "Much of that happens off-chain, which makes the final steps hard to see. It is also a point of weakness for them, because USDT can be frozen," Robinson added.
North Korea yesterday denied involvement in the Binance hack. “The FBI is trying to brand the DPRK as a ‘cyber criminal state’,” the country’s official KCNA news agency quoted Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as saying.
"It is a grave political provocation against the DPRK that the US misleads the international public opinion as if all the cyber crimes in different parts of the world are our deeds."
Binance has promised to reimburse all tokens stolen by the hackers. It has said it will pay this out of its own resources, including about \$1bn worth of bitcoin held in its emergency fund. Additional reporting by Song Jung-a in Seoul
See Markets Insight
Commodities
---
HARRY DEMPSEY — TOKYO
STEPHANIE FINDLAY — HOUSTON
MALCOLM MOORE — LONDON
Japanese companies have embarked on a \$21bn global deal spree to strengthen their grip on gas supplies following the market turmoil triggered by conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine.
The investments since 2023 have been concentrated on shale resources in the US Gulf Coast, supporting Japan's energy security drive and Donald Trump's goal for US energy dominance, according to energy data analytics firm Enverus.
Japan is the world's second-largest buyer of liquefied natural gas after China. As well as seeking to replace disrupted Middle Eastern supplies and declining reserves in Asia, Japanese companies also have ambitions to insert themselves at the heart of the US power build-out for AI data centres and to act as a bridge to bring American LNG to developing Asian markets.
Japan has now overtaken the UK, Canada and Australia as the primary source of foreign investment in US gas resources, accounting for two-fifths of the total over the previous four years.
"A paradigm shift has taken place for Japanese energy procurement in the wake of the Iran war with a return to bolstering diversity of supply chains, even if it comes at an additional cost,"
said Saul Kavonic, senior analyst at MST Financial.
Alongside substantial investment in US shale, Japanese LNG buyers have strengthened positions in gasfields in Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea in the past six months.
“For the gas markets this is a rearrangement caused by geopolitical circumstances,” said José Luis Vittor, oil and gas practice lead at Womble Bond Dickinson. “For the Japanese, it’s having control of the resources.”
Tokyo sent a key policy signal in its foundational energy plan, adopted last year. It stated that gas would maintain a crucial role in the power system beyond 2040 and encouraged utilities to secure long-term LNG contracts and invest in gas resources and export infrastructure.
Jera, Japan's largest power generator and the world's biggest LNG buyer, spent \$1.5bn last year to acquire the South Mansfield shale gasfield in Louisiana. Global chief executive Yukio Kani said the US was previously under-represented for a “global supply portfolio”.
Japan has had a troubled history of investing in US shale. A bout of ill-timed dealmaking in 2010-12 caused widespread impairments across the trading houses as gas prices fell.
Many are convinced that a supercycle in gas demand to power AI data centres means this time will be different.
Katsuya Nakanishi, chief executive of Mitsubishi Corporation, said the trading house's \$7.5bn deal this year for US shale gas producer Aethon would allow the group to ship gas to Europe but that its main goal was to supply American customers.
"The objective with Aethon is to capture US demand through local production for local consumption," he said.
Equities
---
ZIJING WU AND WILLIAM SANDLUND
HONG KONG
Chinese regulators have told banks to hold fire on company listings and large share sales in an effort to bolster the country's struggling stock markets.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has held meetings with investment banks and given informal instructions – or “window guidance” – in the past few days about pausing initial public offerings, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions.
Large sales by existing shareholders have also been temporarily suspended until the markets have recovered.
The CSI 300, mainland China's benchmark index, fell 8.5 per cent in October for its worst month in more than a decade. It is down 15 per cent this year, while the S&P 500 has gained 10 per cent.
Chinese equities have been mired in a prolonged downturn since the summer, pressured by macroeconomic issues and mounting scepticism about AI investment. A tax crackdown on offshore trusts has also prompted some billionaires to sell stocks to pay their tax bills, further weighing on markets.
Earlier interventions, ranging from state-backed fund purchases in July to recent regulatory measures limiting share sales, have failed to reverse the decline.
Chinese policymakers have previously slowed the pace of IPOs during market downturns as part of attempts to preserve liquidity.
The move threatens to put the brakes on dealmaking in China's equity markets, which had shown signs of revival after a prolonged downturn. IPO deal volume this year has reached more than Rmb292bn (\$44bn) – the highest since 2023 – according to Bloomberg data. Chipmaker YMTC is one company that had been expected to list this year but is yet to do so.
The new measures are in addition to earlier guidance last month that included stabilisation methods such as accelerated share buybacks and asking investors to curb equity sales, according to the people.
The moves were “unlikely to generate a lasting turnaround unless paired with something that addresses the structural challenges more directly”, said Thomas Mathews, Asia-Pacific head of markets at Capital Economics. “That means boosting earnings growth, which in the near term probably means monetary or fiscal support."
On Monday the CSRC, People's Bank of China and National Financial Regulatory Administration said they had held meetings with securities brokerages and fund companies on ways to stabilise stock markets. Measures include cutting the rate on its relending facility for share buybacks to 1 per cent from 1.25 per cent, boosting swap operations and encouraging share buybacks.

Market reaction was muted yesterday, with the CSI 300 ending 0.2 per cent lower and the tech-focused Star 50 index down 3.8 per cent, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng gained 0.6 per cent.
Sam Konrad, investment manager at Jupiter Asset Management, said: “This is an example of why we don’t have a fundamentally positive view on the long-term outlook for Chinese equity markets. It’s a suggestion that Chinese equity markets are reliant on government support to try and boost them.”
He added: “Over the long term Chinese equity markets have been some of the worst-performing equity markets in the world. We think the economic system in China means growth is not translated into earnings growth.”
Jason Lui, head of Asia-Pacific equity and derivative strategy at BNP Paribas, said: "While these policies may not trigger an immediate reversal of sentiment similar to September 2024, they present medium-term opportunities for investors seeking to accumulate China A-share exposure."
Chinese stocks rebounded in September and October 2024 after regulators unleashed a wave of stimulus, including two central bank liquidity facilities designed to help brokers and institutional investors buy shares.
The rally gained further momentum early last year as DeepSeek's breakthrough prompted global investors to revalue Chinese technology stocks. Confidence was then shaken by US President Donald Trump's tariff war, prompting Beijing to mobilise state-backed funds, known as the “national team”, to help set a floor for China's stock markets from April last year.
Rounds of sales in the national team's ETF and stock holdings in the first quarter of this year renewed doubts about the rally's sustainability.
The CSRC did not respond to a request for comment.
Jeff Weinstein
Partner
FJ Labs
---
Anil Kashyap Markets Insight
he cyber heist at Binance already offers a number of lessons for investors, regulators and policymakers. Policymakers, routinely
Policymakers routinely plan, via war games and stress tests, for a variety of financial stability risks. One thing that sets cyber attacks apart from most other risks is that it is a question of when a major financial institution will be compromised, not if.
One parlour game among financial stability experts is to speculate about why we have not yet had a massive breach. The Binance debacle suggests one possibility — maybe banks and conventionally regulated financial infrastructure are no longer the most inviting targets.
If the crypto ecosystem has been sufficiently careless about guarding against attacks, then that is where those seeking to profit from cyber crime will shift.
But there should not be much comfort to be taken from that.
Major banks are under constant attack. The law of large numbers, coupled with the way increasingly advanced AI empowers attackers, suggests it is only a matter of time before a substantial attack succeeds.
It is sometimes said that the rise of AI will allow institutions to fight back against cyber attacks on an equal footing. That is too optimistic.
AI can and should be used to identify vulnerabilities and will be part of the efforts to address them. But as the recent hack of the AI model and data repository Hugging Face makes clear, we cannot trust to technology alone.
Efforts to address deficiencies will depend on humans, who can't work and adapt as quickly as AI. Hence defence efforts will lag behind the attackers.
The early reports on the Binance hack point to the potential involvement of state-sponsored attackers.
Individual institutions will never have sufficient resources to battle such actors, and it's unreasonable to expect that they can. While there is some cooperation among major financial institutions to share information, governments have a vital role to play in creating standards that protect their citizens' best interests.
For the banking system, there is an oversight regime in place to help address the risks of an AI attack. The same is not true in the crypto
---
ecosystem. The lack of rigorous oversight might promote innovation, but it also makes crypto companies vulnerable. Right now, a Binance-type attack may not undermine faith in the broader financial system. But if the crypto ecosystem continues to grow and become more integrated with the traditional financial system, the impact could be far more devastating. One truism about cyber risks is that an organisation (or a financial system) is only as strong as its weakest link.
Another reason to worry is that criminals and other hostile actors could use the crypto ecosystem to train AI agents on how best to hack financial institutions. AI is improving by leaps and bounds. Different institutions use different defences. But learning how to hack one system can provide insights into how to attack another.

If the functioning of a major financial institution, or a key part of the established financial infrastructure, is compromised, that could quickly sow widespread distrust of the financial system. Trust is the grease that allows the financial system to function and to support businesses and households.
If it is badly damaged in a cyber attack instigated by a hostile nation or non-state actor, it will not be easily regained. The systemic ramifications could be far-reaching.
Banks invest heavily in guarding against these risks, and the US Treasury department and bank regulators have been working with regulated financial institutions to promote preparedness. But both the size and the nature of private sector investments are going to fall short of what is required to protect the resilience of the financial system.
Policymakers should recognise the attack on Binance for what it is: a warning shot of potentially far worse things to come.
Guarding against hacks that steal billions of dollars and undermine faith in finance requires the public sector to work closely with the private sector to enhance resilience and to develop plans should things go awry.
And allowing the crypto world – a large and growing part of finance – to remain subject to minimal oversight compromises our national wellbeing. Innovation is good but it needs to be coupled with appropriate oversight.
Anil Kashyap is a professor of economics and finance at Chicago Booth. Kathryn Judge, professor at Columbia Law School, contributed to this piece
Exploring Cyprus as a hub for fund management in a fragmented landscape

---

---
\- US stocks edge higher as voters go to the polls for midterm elections
US stock markets rose yesterday, with tech shares rebounding from their recent rout as voters across the country cast their votes in the midterm elections.
The blue-chip S&P 500 rose 0.5 per cent by early afternoon in New York, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index advanced 0.9 per cent, buoyed by semiconductor stocks. Advanced Micro Devices rose 4.9 per cent, Nvidia was up 3.2 per cent and the broader Philadelphia Semiconductor Index of US chip stocks rose 3.3 per cent.
The advance in US equities marked a return to stability following a sell-off over the past week and came as oil prices extended a decline on Monday that was prompted by an unconfirmed report of diplomatic progress in peace talks between the US and Iran.
Brent, the global benchmark for crude, fell 1.3 per cent to \$103.50 a barrel.
The dollar was up 0.1 per cent against a basket of other major currencies on the day that Americans went to the polls.
Prediction platform Polymarket was pricing a 75 per cent chance that the Democrats would take the Senate and an even higher probability of a majority in the House of Representatives.
"Markets would intuitively treat a strong result for Republicans as bullish for equities and bearish for bonds, and the opposite for a Democratic sweep,"
said Gabriele Foà, global credit portfolio manager at Algebrais Investments.
In Europe, the Stoxx 600 index fell 0.5 per cent whilst the FTSE 100 declined by 1.1 per cent, erasing four days of gains.
In Asia, South Korea's Kospi index fell 3.6 per cent whilst the Nikkei 225 slipped 0.3 per cent.
Official data yesterday showed that job openings in the US rose by 333,000 in September, while the figure for August was revised higher. Data tracking factory orders also rose more than economists expected. Analysts from Goldman Sachs added 0.1 percentage point to their
estimate of expanding third-quarter US GDP following the two data releases, taking the figure to 3.5 per cent.
Government bonds, which have come under pressure in recent months amid signs of overheating in the US economy, weakened further after the data. The two-year US Treasury yield rose 0.03 percentage points to 4.61 per cent.
Bond markets also weakened globally. The UK 10-year yield rose 0.05 percentage points to 5.24 per cent, and 10-year Bund yields were up 0.05 percentage points at 3.34 per cent.
Abigail Tobias
Markets update | US | Eurozone | Japan | UK | China | Brazil | Stocks | S&P 500 | Eurofirst 300 | Nikkei 225 | FTSE100 | Shanghai Comp | Bovespa | Level | 7580.85 | 2573.69 | 63081.86 | 10638.43 | 3608.10 | 165288.62 | % change on day | 0.52 | -0.60 | Closed | -1.14 | -0.82 | -1.57 | Currency | $ index (DXY) | $ per € | Yen per $ | $ per £ | Rmb per $ | Real per $ | Level | 101.84 | 1.119 | 158.445 | 1.342 | 6.67 | 5.496 | % change on day | 0.10 | -0.022 | 0.361 | -0.007 | 0.34 | 1.057 | Govt. bonds | 10-Year Treasury | 10-year-Bund | 10-year JGB | 10-Year Gilt | 10-year-bond | 10-year-bond | Yield | 4.96 | 3.31 | 2.80 | 5.26 | 1.63 | 15.85 | Basis point change on day | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | -0.02 | 0.39 | World / Commods | FTSE All-World | Oil - Brent | Oil - WTI | Gold | Silver | Metals (LMEX) | Level | 731.46 | 103.46 | 95.97 | 3927.06 | 49.69 | 5756.40 | % change on day | -0.06 | -1.25 | -0.51 | -1.02 | -1.88 | 1.25 | Main equity markets


Biggest movers


Prices taken at 17:00 GMT Nov 03 |
The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth. |
---
COSTAS MOURSELAS AND
IAN SMITH — LONDON
AMELIA POLLARD — NEW YORK
Marshall Wace and Millennium Management were among the hedge funds hit last month as investor worries over the sustainability of the AI boom triggered a sharp reversal in Wall Street's tech rally.
Marshall Wace, the \$80bn hedge fund co-founded by billionaires Paul Marshall and Ian Wace, saw its two key strategies fall in October, according to people who had seen the numbers.
The Eureka strategy, which is managed by a team of portfolio managers, was down 5.4 per cent in October, trimming its year-to-date gain to 5.3 per cent. The data- and model-driven Tops strategy lost 3.6 per cent, remaining up 1.3 per cent for the year.
Meanwhile, Izzy Englander's Millennium, which manages \$95bn, was down 2.3 per cent last month, leaving it with a 5.7 per cent gain for the first 10 months of the year.
Global hedge funds, in aggregate, lost 3 per cent last month, according to data provider PivotalPath, with equity strategies faring worst as they bore the brunt of the tech sell-off. Year-to-date gains for the industry stand in the mid-single digits, according to PivotalPath.
Billionaire Ken Griffin's hedge fund giant Citadel bucked the trend, with its
flagship Wellington fund rising 1.7 per cent for the month and up 15.3 per cent for the year.
Hedge funds, which use leverage to magnify gains, have had to navigate financial markets that have been simultaneously whipsawed by the war in Iran, AI bubble fears, rising interest rates and the US midterm elections.
The Nasdaq 100 index tumbled into correction territory last week after falling 10 per cent from its October 6 record high, as lacklustre tech earnings fuelled fears about how long it will take for the vast investments in AI to turn a profit.
Intel, in which the US government has a minor stake, was among the biggest losers, falling 29 per cent in the chip-maker's worst one-day drop since 1974.
“It’s been an ugly week all around,” said one prime broker after the Nasdaq dropped 3.5 per cent on Friday, describing how hedge funds had fared in the market upheaval.
Bond markets also endured a volatile month, particularly in the Eurozone, as oil prices climbed and France's political crisis deepened, feeding nerves about the outlook for its sovereign debt. French and Italian bonds sold off against haven German Bunds and against equivalent-duration euro interest rate swaps, resulting in big moves for relative value and spread trades that are popular with hedge funds.
Marshall Wace, Millennium and Citadel all declined to comment. | 27190.86 | 25351.86 | 
AMERICAS

Stock Market movements over last 30 days, with the FTSE All-World in the same currency as a comparison
---
Dow Jones Ind
---
FTSE 100
FTSE EuroFirst
-0.60%
-1.14%
Nikkei
Closed



Day ▷ -0.34% Month ▷ 1.36% Year ▷ 9.59% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Australia | All Ordinaries | 9308.90 | 8977.20 | Australia | S&P ASX 200 | 8886.80 | 8856.50 | Australia | S&P ASX 200 Res | 7107.30 | 7162.40 | Austria | AIX | 6396.13 | 6430.27 | Belgium | BEL 20 | 5837.52 | 5876.76 | Belgium | BEL Mid | 6448.92 | 6470.71 | Brazil | Bovespa | 165288.62 | 167921.60 | Canada | S&P TSX 60 | 2117.03 | 2135.53 | Canada | S&P TSX Comp | 35554.91 | 35801.69 | Chile | SS&P/OLX IGPA GEN | 56920.02 | 56920.02 | China | China FSE A200 | 10001.78 | 10067.56 | China | China Shanghai A | 3763.02 | 3814.59 | China | China Shanghai B | 2867.4 | 2768.98 | China | China Shanghai Comp | 3608.18 | 3638.03 | China | Shenzhen A | 2169.01 | 2194.18 | China | Shenzhen B | 1134.60 | 1137.44 | Croatia | CROBEX | 4407.77 | 4425.65 | Cyprus | CSE M&P GEN | 305.61 | 310.31 | Hang Seng
Day ▷ -0.34% Month ▷ 1.96% Year ▷ -0.72% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Czech Republic | Czech Republic PX | 2645.31 | 2638.01 | Denmark | DMX Copenhagen 20 | 1648.67 | 1646.11 | Egypt | EGX 30 | 49255.70 | 48403.10 | Estonia | OMX Tallinn | 2240.78 | 2240.51 | Finland | OMX Helsinki General | 12950.96 | 12988.77 | France | French CAC40 | 8020.31 | 8047.69 | France | SIB 120 | 6076.49 | 6094.49 | Germany | M-OAX | 30743.36 | 30855.37 | Germany | Tec-Dax | 4092.59 | 4115.74 | Germany | XETRA Dax | 25864.62 | 25881.09 | Greece | Athens | 2618.12 | 2602.41 | Greece | FTSE/ASIA | 6697.84 | 6659.10 | Hong Kong | Hang Seng | 23525.97 | 23393.32 | Hong Kong | HS China Enterprises | 7943.10 | 7906.11 | Hong Kong | HSCC Red Chip | 3961.37 | 3911.75 | Hungary | Bux | 146075.44 | 145330.02 | India | BSE Sensex | 76917.85 | 75692.78 | Indonesia | Jakarta Comp | 4904.29 | 5096.83 |
FTSE All World
\$ per €
Day ▷ -0.01% Month ▷ -0.80% Year ▷ 15.86% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Norway | Oslo All Share | 2514.81 | 2533.67 | Pakistan | KSE 100 | 168018.86 | 166564.07 | Philippines | Manila Comp | 5624.17 | 5680.35 | Poland | Wig | 155849.62 | 156383.04 | Portugal | PSI 20 | 9233.89 | 9326.46 | Portugal | PSI General | 6276.04 | 5288.08 | Romania | Romania BET Index | 34803.25 | 35086.93 | Russia | Russia Traded Index in USD | 988.10 | 988.10 | Saudi Arabia | TAHANUL All Share Index | 9676.13 | 9882.85 | Singapore | FTSE Snabs Times | 5269.29 | 5303.83 | Slovakia | SAX | 319.87 | 320.30 |
ACTIVE STOCKS
UK MARKET WINNERS & LOSERS
Day ▷ -0.82% Month ▷ -6.09% Year ▷ -9.26% | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Sweden | DMX Stockholm 30 | 3294.44 | 3287.02 | Sweden | DMX Stockholm AS | 1136.89 | 1138.00 | Switzerland | SMI Index | 14743.09 | 14802.52 | Taiwan | Weighted Stock Index | 43307.54 | 44520.14 | Thailand | Bangkok SET | 1481.01 | 1507.20 | Turkey | BIST 100 | 11023.55 | 10961.67 | UK | FTSE 100 | 10038.43 | 10761.33 | UK | FTSE 4Good UK | 9296.13 | 9396.65 | UK | FTSE All Share | 5746.54 | 5608.28 | UK | FTSE techMARK 100 | 9761.22 | 9753.47 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Composite | 16438.56 | 16467.22 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Industrial | 51808.64 | 51983.69 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Transport | 20895.94 | 20842.92 | U.S.A. | Dow Jones Utilities | 430.94 | 431.33 | U.S.A. | Nasdaq 100 | 28172.20 | 27989.82 | U.S.A. | Nasdaq Composite | 25051.86 | 25164.36 | U.S.A. | NYSE Composite | 24363.13 | 24372.07 | U.S.A. | S&P 500 | 7560.85 | 7541.40 | \$ per £ ¥ per \$
0.3610% |
---


Oil Brent \$ | Country | Index | Latest | Previous | Venezuela | IBC | 8468.10 | 8479.81 | Vietnam | Viet Nam Index | 1689.02 | 1710.72 | Cross-Border | Euro Stoxx 50 (Eur) | 6144.95 | 6176.06 | Netherlands | Euronext 100 ID | 1870.83 | 1879.99 | Cross-Border | FTSE Food Global ($) | 20885.40 | 20856.02 | Cross-Border | FTSE All World ($) | 731.92 | 731.91 | Cross-Border | FTSE £300 | 2573.69 | 2589.34 | Cross-Border | FTSE Eurotop 100 | 4942.13 | 4977.12 | Cross-Border | FTSE Global 100 ($) | 5563.13 | 5534.58 | Cross-Border | FTSE Gold Min ($) | 5071.33 | 5071.33 | Cross-Border | FTSE Latibank Top (Eur) | 5542.60 | 5738.60 | Cross-Border | FTSE World ($) | 1370.23 | 1370.61 | Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 100 (Eur) | 7024.23 | 7073.68 | Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 80 ID | 8363.45 | 8403.85 | £ per € |
UK RECENT RIGHTS ISSUES | Nov 02Regions & countries | No ofstocks | US$/indices | Daily%Chg | Monthly%Chg | YTD%Chg | UTS$/Total Ret | YTD%Total Ret | Gr DivYield |
Petra Diamonds Ltd
Pennon Group PLC |
Rights Issue: 7 for 15 at 250p p.s., payable in full Oct. 26 (xr 12.10.26).
Data provided by ICE, www.ice.com
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com
FTSE 100 SUMMARY | 9.87 | Financials | 2.24 | 9.13 | Consumer Digital Services | 1.30 | 8.12 | Technology | 1.20 | 7.56 | Financials ex Inv Co. | 1.10 | 6.51 | Software & Computer Svcs. | 1.03 | 6.48 | Banks | 0.76 | 5.76 | Life Insurance | 0.76 | 5.63 | Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | -1.33 | 5.37 | Health Care | -1.45 | 4.77 | Personal Goods | -2.99 | 4.27 | Investment Banking & Brokerage | -4.31 | 3.75 | Medical Equipment & Svcs | -6.53 | 3.46 | Leisure Goods | -16.92 | 3.23 | Hold Goods & Home Care | -17.84 | 2.94 | Precious Metals & Mining | -17.87 | Nov 02Regions & countries | No ofstocks | USStim stocks | USDSailyChg | MonthlyChg | %YTD% Chg | YTDTotalRet | USSTotal Ret | YTDTotalRet | Gr DivYield | Developed ex Canada | 5149 | 1282.51 | -0.27 | -2.09 | 10.21 | 2188.43 | 11.75 | 1.55 | Developed ex Europe | 4153 | 1486.10 | -0.42 | -2.62 | 11.28 | 2378.86 | 12.56 | 1.33 | Developed ex Eurozone | 4760 | 1372.84 | -0.35 | -2.00 | 10.97 | 2278.48 | 12.41 | 1.46 | Developed ex US | 3824 | 778.13 | 0.22 | -1.31 | 10.29 | 1563.52 | 12.99 | 2.59 | Developed ex UK | 5146 | 1383.92 | -0.28 | -2.14 | 10.31 | 2278.50 | 11.71 | 1.51 | Developed ex Japan | 4018 | 1348.08 | -0.19 | -1.73 | 10.02 | 2322.21 | 11.52 | 1.53 | Developed Ex Asia Pacific ex Japan | 2301 | 806.88 | 0.50 | -6.39 | 18.55 | 1458.91 | 21.14 | 2.41 | Developed Asia Plac ex Jap | 953 | 1043.39 | 0.34 | -8.50 | 25.56 | 2306.16 | 28.69 | 2.74 | Developed Europe | 1213 | 705.37 | 0.74 | 2.17 | 4.77 | 1520.17 | 7.68 | 1.86 | Developed Europe ex UK | 991 | 101.16 | 0.18 | 1.50 | 3.74 | 1706.64 | 8.44 | 2.14 | Developed Eurozone | 606 | 692.83 | 1.00 | -1.07 | 2.11 | 1479.17 | 4.88 | 2.82 | Developed Europe Asia Plac | 3514 | 747.50 | 0.20 | -1.74 | 10.24 | 1479.17 | 4.88 | 2.82 |
FT GLOBAL 500: THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPANIES |
BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS |
---
See FTSE website for more details www.ftse.com/products/indices/gilts.
© 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC. All rights reserved. The Tradeweb FTSE Gilt Closing Prices information contained herein is proprietary to Tradeweb; may not be copied or re-distributed; is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely; and does not constitute investment advice. Tradeweb is not responsible for any loss or damage that might result from the use of this information.

GILTS: UK FTSE ACTUARIES INDICES | Price IndicesFixed Coupon | Nov 3 | Dayschg % | TotalReturn | MonthReturn | YearReturn | Yield | Up to 5 Years | 84.83 | -0.07 | 2666.04 | 0.40 | 1.42 | 4.76 | 5-10 Years | 142.84 | -0.29 | 3393.68 | 0.96 | -0.66 | 5.09 | 10-15 Years | 142.56 | -0.48 | 3747.60 | 1.83 | -1.45 | 5.42 | 5-15 Years | 141.16 | -0.35 | 3471.70 | 1.24 | -0.89 | 5.23 | Over 15 Years | 167.87 | -0.78 | 3371.03 | 3.46 | -3.11 | 5.63 | All stocks | 125.71 | -0.34 | 3158.20 | 1.42 | -0.61 | 5.37 | Index Linked | Nov 3 | Day'schg % | Monthchg % | Year'schg % | TotalReturn | Return1 Month | Return1 Year | Up to 5 Years | 365.88 | -0.17 | 0.10 | 3.00 | 3193.02 | 0.11 | 3.83 | Over 5 Years | 476.63 | -0.78 | 1.41 | -0.34 | 3737.40 | 1.41 | 0.29 | 5-15 Years | 460.50 | -0.47 | 0.45 | 1.68 | 3869.92 | 0.45 | 2.45 | Over 15 Years | 481.23 | -1.10 | 2.44 | -2.18 | 3635.13 | 2.44 | -1.69 | All stocks | 473.25 | -0.64 | 1.12 | 0.31 | 3787.49 | 1.12 | 0.97 | Yield Indices | Nov 3 | Nov 2 | Yr Ago | 5 Yrs | 4.89 | 4.85 | 4.26 | 10 Yrs | 5.24 | 5.19 | 4.59 | 15 Yrs | 5.50 | 5.45 | 4.88 | 20 Yrs | 5.62 | 5.57 | 5.02 | 45 Yrs | 5.42 | 5.36 | 4.91 | Real Yield 0% Inflation | Nov 3 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago | Up to 5 Years | 1.04 | 2.55 | 0.98 | 0.73 | Over 5 Years | 2.25 | 16.18 | 2.20 | 1.90 | 5-15 Years | 2.02 | 9.37 | 1.97 | 1.61 | Over 15 Years | 2.35 | 22.96 | 2.30 | 2.01 | All stocks | 2.20 | 13.27 | 2.15 | 1.86 | Real Yield 5% Inflation | Nov 3 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago | Up to 5 Years | 0.78 | 2.55 | 0.71 | 0.43 | Over 5 Years | 2.22 | 16.18 | 2.17 | 1.88 | 5-15 Years | 1.96 | 9.37 | 1.91 | 1.54 | Over 15 Years | 2.33 | 22.96 | 2.29 | 2.00 | All stocks | 2.16 | 13.27 | 2.11 | 1.82 | FT
FINANCIAL TIMES
---
Profit. Power. Politics. | CT PrivEq | 467.00 | -1.00 | 592.00 | 439.84 | 6.06 | 691.09 | -32.56 | HGCapital | 392.50 | -1.50 | 512.00 | 318.64 | 1.27 | 530.50 | -25.54 | HVPE | 3320.00 | -30.00 | 3500.00 | 2807.59 | — | 4541.00 | -26.89 | ICG Ent | 1404.00 | — | 1572.00 | 1288.31 | 2.99 | 2092.36 | -33.66 | Pantheon Int | 387.00 | -4.50 | 409.00 | 339.05 | — | 546.30 | -29.25 | Partners PE € | 570.76 | -8.42 | 958.06 | 567.42 | 9.50 | 11.53 | -39.81 |
---
---

---
All data is as of close of the previous business day. Company classifications are based on the ICB system used by FTSE. FSTE 100 constituents are shown in bold. Closing prices are shown in pence unless otherwise indicated. Highs & lows are based on intra-day trading over a rolling 52 week period. Price/earnings ratios (P/E) are based on latest annual reports and accounts and are updated with interim figures. P/E is calculated using the company's diluted earnings from continuing operations. Yields are based on closing price and on dividends paid in the last financial year and updated with interim figures. Yields are shown in net terms; dividends on UK companies are net of 10% tax, non-UK companies are gross of tax. Highs & lows, yields and PER are adjusted to reflect capital changes where appropriate. Trading volumes are end of day aggregated totals, rounded to the nearest 1,000 shares. Net asset value per share (NAV) and split analytics are provided only as a guide. Discounts and premiums are calculated using the latest cum fair net asset value estimate and closing price. Discounts, premiums, gross redemption yield (GRY) and hurdle rate (HR) to share price (SP) and HR to wipe out (WO) are displayed as a percentage, NAV in pence.
\- trading ex-dividend
---
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information.
Data provided by
The FT Share Service is a paid-for print listing service and may not be fully representative of all LSE-listed companies. This service is available to all listed companies, subject to the Editors discretion. For new sales enquiries please email data@ft.com. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com

Markets and data happen here.
FINANCIAL TIMES
www.ice.com

www.cpgbl.com, Email: fundservices@cpgbl.com
Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Emerging Markets Stock Fund
Atlantas Sicav | Canaccord International Fund Managers Limited | (JER) | 4th Floor at 37 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QA | +44 (0) 1534 700 104 (Int.) +44 808 169 7966 (UK) | FCA Recognised-Ireland UCITS |
---
[EMPTY]


Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
---
ARTEMIS The PROFIT HUNTER
Algebris Investments |

---

---
---
---
---
---

---

---

---
www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00
---

---

---

McInroy & Wood
Easter Alderston, Haddington, EH41 3SF, 01620 825867 |
---

McInroy & Wood
Easter Alderston, Haddington, EH41 3SF, 01620 825867 |
---
---



---
3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL
Order Desk and Enquiries: 0345 601 9610 |




---
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m | Troy Asset Management (1200) | (UK) | 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL | Order Desk and enquiries 0345 608 0950 | Authorised Inv Funds | Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited |
The fund prices quoted on these pages are supplied by the fund operators, fund managers and fund administrators. Details of funds published on these pages, including prices, are for the purpose of information only and should only be used as a guide. The Financial Times Limited makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness and they should not be relied upon when making an investment decision. The sale of interests in the funds listed on these pages may, in certain jurisdictions, be restricted by law and the funds will not necessarily be available to persons in all jurisdictions in which the publication circulates. Persons in any doubt should take appropriate professional advice. Data collated by ICE. The fund prices published in this edition along with additional information are also available on the Financial Times website, www.ft.com/funds. The funds published on these pages are grouped together by fund management company. Prices are in price unless otherwise indicated. The change, if shown, is the change on the previously quoted figure (not all funds update prices daily). Those designated \$ with no prefix refer to US dollars. Yield percentage figures (in Tuesday to Saturday papers) allow for buying expenses.
OEIC: Open-Ended Investment Company. Similar to a unit trust but using a company rather than a trust structure. Different share classes are issued to reflect a different currency, charging structure or type of holder.
Bid price: Also called selling price. The price at which units in a unit trust are sold by investors.
Offer price: Also called buying price. The price at which units in a unit trust are bought by investors. Includes manager's initial charge.
Single price: Based on a mid-market valuation of the underlying investments. The buying and selling price for shares of an OEIC and units of a single priced unit trust are the same. Treatment of manager's periodic capital charge: 24 and 36 months: 24 and 36 month annualized performance figures calculated using the total gain (or loss) from that period. Performance formula is adjusted to consider the income distribution during the reference period.
Yield: Calculating using the fund's projected annual income, divided by the latest available net asset value. |
The prices appearing in the newspaper are the most recent provided by the managers/operators.
Charges for this advertising service are based on the number of lines published and the classification of the fund. Please contact data@ft.com for further information. For further queries contact newspapers@ice.com

ice.com
Markets and data happen here.
www.ice.com


ARTS
---

The Art Market | Charleston has commenced a £15mn fundraising campaign as the group enjoys a cultural revival. By Melanie Gerlis
Charleston, the Sussex home and retreat of the bohemian Bloomsbury set, has commenced a £15mn fundraising campaign amid a resur-
gence of the group across the UK's arts scene.
The first £1mn for the charitable trust's endowment has come courtesy of the writer Virginia Nicholson – granddaughter of the painter Vanessa Bell – and her husband, the novelist and screenwriter William Nicholson. Bell lived and worked at Charleston for more than 40 years from 1916, alongside her fellow artist and sometime lover Duncan Grant. Other regulars included Bell's sister, the writer Virginia Woolf, and the economist John Maynard Keynes, another of Grant's lovers.
Charleston's fundraising coincides with a revival of interest in the Bloomsbury set. The latest West End play by celebrated writer James Graham, The Standard of Living, explores the impact of Keynes' time at Charleston on his influential economic theories. Next week, Tate Britain opens a show that charts the creative partnership between Bell and Grant and how their group's "commitment to living lives centred around freedom and radical experimentation" reshaped culture and thought in Britain. This will include a restaging of their Charleston studio, borrowing from among the 4,000 individual items maintained in the rooms of the Sussex house.
For Virginia, named after her great aunt and painted by both Bell and Grant, "I've seen the whole story, I've known Charleston all my life, I hold the historical memory of the Trust", she says. The social historian's first book, written in collaboration with her father Quentin Bell (Vanessa's son with Clive Bell), details the Firle farmhouse and its 20th-century history (Charleston: A
Clockwise from main: Charleston's eclectic interior; artist Vanessa Bell (c1910); painter and designer Duncan Grant (1957) — Lewis Ronald; George C. Beresford/Hulton Archive/Getty; John Hedgecoe/Popperfoto
Bloomsbury House & Garden, 1997). For William: “Charleston’s not mine, I’ve married into it, but it is extraordinary what it has done for our life.” With characteristic vim, he explains that “it brings together people who are interesting, and you actually meet them in real life, not this bloody digital life. If there is anything that I want to survive, then it’s that.”
The Nicholsons' donation represents "a huge chunk of our pension, we are not super-rich", William says. He adds, though, that "I was overpaid for quite a number of years", notably, he says, when brought in as an emergency third writer for Ridley Scott's 2000 epic film Gladiator.
The hope, they say, is to encourage others to donate. William's pitch is that "it seems to me that having an endowment is sexy, because it means immortality, and immortality is sexy". It has already worked: when we meet in the Nichols' Sussex family home, there is delight that the British fashion designer Kim Jones, creative director for Bosideng's Areal label, has just matched their £1mn, confirms Nathaniel Hepburn, director and chief executive of Charleston since 2017.
Tate's exhibition, Vanessa Bell & Duncan Grant: Inside Bloomsbury, will cement Bell's reputation as an artist, her granddaughter believes. Grant lived longer, and had success in his time, while Bell "underestimated herself, she tended towards – surprise, surprise – 'Duncan was the genius, the brilliant artist, I am just the woman trailing in his wake'," Virginia says. She adds: "Vanessa's art was not so much eclipsed by Duncan Grant, as by Virginia Woolf," who was
---
acclaimed as a writer from the 1920s.
Charleston's appeal has proved international, including among a group of eight people who have promised gifts in their wills amounting to an additional £2mn for the endowment, Hepburn says. Among these donors, he says, are a gay couple in the US who had their first date at Charleston and “an octogenarian in New Mexico”, who comes regularly to the springtime Charleston Festival. This year’s line-up for the two-week series of talks and events included the Iranian-British author Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe (a prisoner in Iran for almost six years), the actor and singer Olly Alexander and the artist Rose Wylie.
To fund the legal costs of setting up the endowment, another couple cashed in some Tesla stock, “from which they didn’t want to benefit personally”, Hepburn says, referring to the electric-car maker whose chief executive is Elon Musk. “They enjoy the irony that this is being used to save a nicely painted, liberal, progressive, queer house in the Sussex countryside,” Hepburn notes.
The endowment has been in the planning since Charleston was founded as a charity in 1980. “It was always talked about, but every time money came in, it was so desperately needed elsewhere that it had to be diverted . . . We lurched from crisis to crisis for quite a while,” says Virginia, a longtime trustee and now president of the trust.
Despite being something of a national treasure, Charleston receives no regular public funding, relying on entrance fees (with monthly pay-what-you-can days) and its shop and café, as well as membership, venue hire and one-off donations. Total income last year was £4.5mn, with expenditure at £4.3mn, according to the Charity Commission.
“Until a certain number of years ago, we were a seasonal, heritage tourism site and that’s not what the Arts Council or local authorities are set up to support,” Hepburn explains. Now, he says: “We are interdisciplinary, all year round . . . across two sites [they opened a cultural centre in Lewes in 2023] and we will look to the Arts Council for revenue support. Having an endowment doesn’t make the charity rich, we can’t spend that money. We still need to fundraise for the learning programme, the exhibitions, the events.”
Hepburn is also in the thick of the “50 for 50” project, to mark Charleston’s 50th year as a charity in 2030. “The two birthday presents that we want to give are a £15mn endowment and a collection of 50 of the most important and exciting Bloomsbury pieces [of art] that are still in private ownership,” Hepburn says. This has already brought in an angular Roger Fry portrait of the novelist E M Forster (1911) and, this week, the donation of what is believed to be Grant’s final portrait of Bell, a pencil and biro drawing of her with her eyes closed, dated a week after she died of bronchitis in 1961.
The intimacy and tenderness of the drawing underlines Charleston's mythology as a place of meaningful relationships at a time, as William sees it, of "heading towards a world in which all knowledge is contained within a computer". Virginia is of a similar mind: "People lived then how people want and wish they lived now."
charleston.org.uk
Francis Bacon
Jean Fautrier
Lucian Freud
Alberto Giacometti
Richard Hamilton
Liliane Lijn
Marlow Moss
Eduardo Paolozzi
Germaine Richier
Niki de Saint Phalle
Graham Sutherland
William Turnbull
---
9 OCTOBER—11 DECEMBER 2026
ORDOVAS
ORDOVASART.COM
---
hey call it the Fonzi: a multi-billion-dollar financial scandal that has torched the savings of half a million Turks, enraged President
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and shaken his government to the core.
“Fonzie” or “The Fonz” was also the leather-jacketed hero of the 1970s US sitcom Happy Days. But there is nothing happy about the popping of Turkey’s Fonzi bubble. Instead, it is a \$20bn investment fund crisis, its name a mixture of the Turkish word for fund and a reference to Ponzi schemes. “The scale of what is going on is not fully appreciated internationally; this is the leading topic in national conversation,” says Atilla Yesilada of GlobalSource Partners, an Istanbul-based consultancy.
The Fonzi scandal has shaken confidence in Turkey's already struggling \$1.8tn economy, even as Ankara is viewed by Nato allies as an increasingly important bulwark against Middle East instability and Russian revanchism. Over 455,000 retail investors, who were sucked into funds with visions of 1,000 per cent returns, risk seeing their savings lost. Most important of all, and unlike other scandals such as Bernard Madoff's swindle, Turkey's Fonzi crisis is alleged to reach into the highest echelons of government.
To critics, including some within the administration, it is symptomatic of a late-stage cronyism that has hollowed out Turkish institutions after 24 years of increasingly centralised rule – just as questions about Erdoğan's political succession have come to the fore.
A foretaste of the scandal came months before it exploded, when an opposition lawmaker raised a pointed question in Turkey's parliament.
Turkey's capital markets have become “a quagmire”, Ayyüce Türkeş Taş declared, adding that investors were being defrauded through “pooling techniques, self-trading and manipulation”. She noted that even Turkey's finance minister had issued a similar warning and asked why no action was being taken. Her counterparts in the ruling Justice and Development Party, known in Turkish as the AKP, brushed the question aside. Market disruptions are being “resolutely combated”, one said. The “financial architecture” of Erdoğan's vision of a “Turkish century” is “solid”, he added, to cheers from government benches. An investigation proposed by the opposition was swiftly voted down. That exchange, recorded in parliamentary transcripts, took place in December 2025.
Almost a year later, the roll call of establishment figures caught up in the scandal grows virtually every day.
Among those arrested and remanded in custody are the former head of the Istanbul stock exchange; the former presidential adviser credited with devising Erdoğan's "Turkish century" election slogan; a former ambassador to the OECD; a former central bank deputy governor; and the former chief executive and deputy chief executive of Türkiye Sigorta, Turkey's largest non-life insurer, controlled by a sovereign wealth fund chaired by Erdoğan.
The investigations encompass allegations ranging from bribery and market manipulation to abuse of office and involvement in a criminal organisation. Some suspects have denied wrongdoing, while others have made no public response to the allegations against them. Other senior officials have lost their positions.
Two successive chiefs of Turkey's capital markets regulator, the SPK, have lost their jobs, one citing ill health, and a deputy finance minister has retired following the arrest of his son-in-law. Closest to the top of the political pile is the AKP's deputy chair, Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya, who has resigned.
A furious Erdoğan has said the crisis is being handled “with a surgeon’s precision”. But party cadres and allies have been shaken to the core.
The funds crisis is “not a malfunction of the system. Nor, obviously, is it a case of a few bad apples. This is how the system actually works,” says Wolfango Piccoli, a longtime Turkey watcher and head of geopolitical risk at Consello, an advisory group. “It’s a story of institutional degradation, of regulatory bodies that have slowly been hollowed out.”
---
Alican Mordalga is one of the hundreds of thousands of Turks who now rue putting their life savings, in his case some TL6mn (\$120,000), into one of the Fonzi funds. Like many others, he had seen the glossy promotional materials put about by personalities such as Emre Tezmen, the 53-year-old founder of Tera Group whose brokerage and investment funds lie at the centre of the scandal. “The funds were regulated . . . they weren’t some underground operations. So, I trusted them on that basis, just as people do in other
---
countries," Mordalga says. "I don't think anyone imagined something like this could happen."
Tezmen, son of a former politician who chaired Turkish Airlines in the 1990s, founded Tera in 2005 and built it into a sprawling financial group. The rewards that his brokerage dangled to prospective investors were extraordinary. Corporate presentations boasted that its main fund, TLY, returned 4,233 per cent in 2025 against just 13 per cent for the Istanbul stock market.
The Tera operations that investigators are now examining bear an uncomfortable resemblance to the “pump and dump” schemes of financial history, such as Wall Street’s notorious “pool operators” of the roaring 1920s.
In essence, Fonzi funds built up concentrated positions in related companies, bidding up their share prices and flattering the funds' own net asset values. Spectacular returns attracted new investors, providing fresh money for the funds to buy the same or related stocks.
The fortunes of Ōzata Denizcilik, a shipbuilding company, illustrate the mechanics. When it floated in 2024, with a market capitalisation of roughly \$200mn, less than a fifth of its shares were publicly traded. In April, Tera funds began accumulating Ōzata stock at around TL281. By late August, the funds had bought almost 96 per cent of Ōzata's available shares, squeezing its stock price up until it reached a peak of almost TL5,000 in mid-September — a 1,600 per cent return in five months.
The SPK, Turkey's capital markets regulator, has since filed criminal complaints against 11 people, including Tezmen, over suspected manipulation of Özata shares. Tezmen, now remanded in custody, denies wrongdoing.
That segments of the Turkish market had seemingly gone crazy was no secret. Turkey's Financial Stability Committee, which includes finance minister Mehmet Şimşek and the central bank chief, discussed the problem last December. Even then, according to a statement later issued by the SPK, the committee was concerned that “certain portfolio management companies . . . were causing price movements . . . that could not be explained by economic reality”.
Some warnings were more explicit still. Ramazan Başak, a former deputy head of Turkey's financial crimes agency Masak, says he repeatedly alerted the authorities to suspicious transactions but was ignored. Başak was detained in April on suspicion of spreading “misleading information” after he questioned some of Tera's astronomical returns. He was subsequently released and denies wrongdoing.
In June, index provider MSCI warned that “co-ordinated trading behaviour” might be distorting stock market prices. Savvy Turkish investors watched it happening in plain sight.
The bubble burst in late August, after a change in free-float regulations governing shares threw the cycle of wealth creation into sudden reverse. On September 15, investment manager Pusula Portföy said some of its funds could not meet investor redemption requests. The alarm quickly spread. Other investors rushed to sell, there was a full-blown “funds run” and the market tanked.
“No Ponzi dies of natural causes. Either the regulators pull the trigger or investors do. In our case, it was the investors,” says Kerim Rota, an economist who has closely followed the Fonzi crisis. As an indication of how far some share prices have fallen, Özata, the shipbuilder, now trades at TL170 – a 98 per cent fall from its peak.
In an extraordinarily well-timed bet, Kaya, the deputy AKP chair who has since resigned, and her husband, sold their 400,000 Ōzata shares before the crash. Kaya says she has since voluntarily returned more than TL2bn — about \$40mn — in gains from share trading and denies receiving inside information or committing any wrongdoing.
Three Özata directors, including its chair, have been remanded in custody as part of the broader Fonzi investigation into market manipulation. The company has said such moves do not constitute guilt and that it is ready to challenge the detentions in the courts.
---
Turkish authorities now have to confront how to best clean up the mess. On September 17, the day after the market rout, the Financial Stability Committee responded with a co-ordinated series of emergency measures that included a freeze on trading, the liquidation of 131 funds with \$20bn of assets between them, and an increase in lira liquidity by the central bank to limit forced selling.
“We have placed the problematic area under quarantine,” said finance minister Şimşek, adding that it represented just 10 per cent of Turkey's investment fund sector and was not a systemic threat. Crucially, there had been no rush into dollars by worried investors, he said. The exchange rate was stable.


But as the affair has unfolded, two central questions remain so far unanswered. Why did the authorities, who knew about the apparent share price manipulation, allow the bubble to inflate for so long? And if there was collusion, how high up the system did it go?
As consumer confidence collapsed, dropping 8 per cent in October alone, a private poll reportedly delivered to Erdoğan suggested that the AKP's popularity had dropped by 6 per cent in just one month, according to former AKP lawmaker Şamil Tayyar.
The next presidential election must take place by 2028. It is widely assumed that Erdoğan, 72, will find a way to run again. But a constitutional bar on a third presidential term has led to speculation about who might eventually govern Turkey instead. Aydın Ünal, an Erdoğan loyalist and former presidential speechwriter, has warned darkly that the scandal may be a “trap” against Erdoğan, set by rival factions “from within”.
Independent journalists have meanwhile faced growing pressure. On October 14, police raided Halk TV, one of Turkey's most-watched news channels, citing a separate corruption investigation. A state-appointed trustee was subsequently installed to run the channel, which had reported extensively on the Fonzi scandal. "Only dictators raid television stations at dawn and appoint trustees," opposition leader Özgür Özel, who has called the Fonzi scandal the "theft of the century", said after the Halk TV intervention. "While the public demands accountability for the fund scandal . . . they do this."
---
Fraud and speculative bubbles are as old as finance itself. The South Sea Bub-
Nearly half a million retail investors who were drawn to funds with visions of 1,000 per cent returns risk losing their savings. President Erdoğan, above, says the crisis is being handled 'with a surgeon's precision' Adem Altan/AFP/Getty Images/Moe Zoyari/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect
'One of the common patterns of great bubbles is that they take place with . . . support from the ruling class'
ble of 1720, among the most notorious Ponzi schemes in history, burst only months after Britain's parliament passed the so-called Bubble Act, supposedly an initiative to rein in speculative excess. "The original meaning of the word bubble is fraud," says Edward Chancellor, author of Devil Take the Hindmost, a history of financial speculation. "Furthermore, one of the common patterns of great bubbles is that they take place with a degree of support from the governing class. When they pop, there is always political blowback and retribution."
That appears to be true of Turkey too. Erdoğan has sworn that heads will roll. "Those who obtained illicit and exorbitant gains" will be made to answer before the courts, he glowered at an AKP meeting on October 21. "We do not protect those who wrong our people." True to his word, more than 400 people face judicial proceedings, and there have been over 100 arrests so far. A state audit of what happened is due to be delivered to Erdoğan around year-end.
The government has arranged payments of up to TL1mn to each aggrieved investor per fund and established a “repentance account” into which those who made extraordinary gains can voluntarily return their profits. Critics say that system is untransparent and could allow both culprits and the government to sweep the issue under the carpet. “It is the political playbook that the AKP has always used in the past. Move fast, throw some people under the bus, set up an investigation, and then proclaim that the rule of law works,” says Piccoli.
The economic fallout of the scandal may be harder to brush aside. Turkey's economy, struggling with inflation around 30 per cent, needs capital – just when higher global interest rates risk making capital scarcer. But over the past two months the stock market has fallen by around a third, shedding some \$100bn of value.
The crisis may yet have a silver lining. A thorough regulatory clean-up could restore confidence and revive oft-touted plans to make Istanbul an international financial centre. Still, that is cold comfort for the almost half a million Turks and their families directly affected by the Fonzi scandal. “I don’t know if I can ever believe in the Turkish stock market again,” says Mordalga, whose disenchantment speaks to the crisis’s biggest casualty: trust.
That very issue was raised 10 months ago in parliament by the opposition lawmaker, who had asked a second pointed question. "If the authorities had this information, why did they not act in time?" Ayyüce Türkeş Taş inquired. "Isn't that complicity – covering up a crime?"
Additional reporting by Serra Yedikardes
Özata shares soared as Tera funds amassed almost all its tradable stock
Lira per share ('000)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2026 Source: LSEG

FINANCIAL TIMES
'Without fear and without favour'
ft.com/opinion
---
Credit winter has not come quite yet for the AI investment boom – but it is certainly getting colder out there as the leaves fall. Alphabet, Meta and Oracle returned to debt markets this week to sell tens of billions of dollars of additional bonds for access to chips and data centres, adding to a surge in such borrowing this year already estimated at about half a trillion dollars. The hyperscalers are, though, paying notably more than just a few months ago, when it seemed that growth in AI spending to fill the need for compute still had far to go.
On Monday, Oracle sold \$10bn in bonds with coupons of 7 to more than 8.5 per cent, up from 5 to 7 per cent in an issue in February – though shareholders also took a hit, with a concurrent \$10bn share sale. Alphabet, Google's parent, issued 19-year euro-denominated bonds with a coupon of over 5.2 per cent as part of a €6bn sale this week, up from 4.5 per cent for selling debt of the same maturity and currency in May – and at a higher spread over core rates.
Government and corporate borrowers have fretted this year about being “crowded out” by supersized AI bonds offering juicier yields while interest rates have risen. But even as investors will watch the US midterm results for signs that Democratic gains might slow down data centre construction, something is changing in credit markets’ capacity to keep absorbing AI risk.
While these may not sound like large moves in borrowing costs, they add up in dollar terms given the sheer size of issuance that is undergirding investment plans. They raise pressure on the rates of return that will be required from AI spending and are striking for companies that mostly still have top credit ratings and core businesses throwing off cash. This is also reflected in investors paying up to hedge their debt exposure.
The cost to insure Alphabet's dollar debt against a default in the next five years has risen to just under 1 per cent of principal, about the same as for Mexico, a government rated at the lowest levels of investment grade. Mark Zuckerberg has great hopes for Muse, Meta's new personal AI agent. In case he is wrong, investors are now pricing credit default swaps on the creator of the cutesy but compute-hogging agent at 1.2 per cent, in line with junk-rated South Africa.
It would be easier to brush off the market's cooling on AI borrowers if the competition for capital they have unleashed, and the prolongation of higher interest rates and energy prices this year, were not exposing credit cracks elsewhere. Funds that flew high betting on the riskiest layers of European corporate debt in particular have come down with a bump. Yields on these bonds have blown out to double
The higher yields on hyperscaler bonds raise pressure on the rates of return that will be required from tech spending
digits, more than higher-rated junk. Many of the borrowers are in struggling industries such as broadband.
There is a lesson here for bondholders sizing up AI debts that, even if they have far higher credit ratings, they are ultimately bets on who will be on the hook for the complex construction costs of data centres. Some parts of this market are still growing quickly, for example alternative asset managers extending loans secured against assets such as chips, but other creditors will be looking for protection from runaway spending.
Oracle, which was the first of the hyperscalers to start spending more than it generated in cash flow, signalled that \$20bn will be the limit for new money it will raise from capital markets until 2030. Even if that may be a hard resolution to keep, it is significant that this kind of promise is coming into fashion. Investors have braced in case the AI trade implodes with a stock market bang. Instead it might start with a credit market whimper.
Opinion Environment
---
Andy Carter

Pilita Clark

W hen this year's annual UN climate conference, COP31, kicks off next week in the Turkish city of
Antalya, brace yourself for a lot of talk about a topic that is not nearly as dull as it sounds: electricity.
The summit's hosts want governments to back a new goal to raise electricity's share of final energy demand from just over 20 per cent today to 35 per cent by 2035. In other words, they want more cars to run on batteries instead of petrol, and more homes to be heated with electric heat pumps, not gas boilers.
The target is only voluntary but it's a good idea, for the climate and for our wallets. About 80 per cent of the global population lives in countries that are net importers of fossil fuels. Those fuels can get expensive
---
in a crisis, as this year's war in Iran has shown.
But even without such turmoil, the International Energy Agency reckons import bills could fall by more than \$400bn a year by 2035 if those countries boosted their electrification rates. Much upfront investment would be needed but electric tech's lower operating costs mean the pay-off should be lower energy bills across the world by 2035.
Electricity can also cut emissions, especially if it comes from renewables. As it happens, wind and solar are surging so much that renewables last year narrowly overtook coal's 33 per cent share of global power generation for what the Ember energy think-tank says is the first time in a century.
So the COP31 electrification goal should be good news for the green energy transition.
But hang on, you may be thinking. Isn't that transition a pipe dream? Hasn't the share of fossil fuels in the global primary energy mix barely budged, from 85 per cent in 1990 to about 80 per cent today? And doesn't that mean that all that new green power is more of an addition than a transition, which is proving harder than thought?
This is pretty much what the energy analyst Daniel Yergin wrote in Foreign
Affairs last year, and what other prominent experts have argued for years, along with oil executives.
They are not entirely wrong. Fossil fuels do still dominate the global energy system, but not in the way you might think. And replacing them may not be nearly as daunting a challenge for governments as that persistent 80 per cent-plus share of primary energy suggests.
The clue is in the word “primary”. Primary energy refers to the total energy content of coal, oil or other resources before it gets converted into the so-called “final energy” we get when we buy electricity or fill up at a petrol station. Final energy is different again from the “useful energy” we actually use when we turn on a light or drive a car.
Because burning fuels to generate power, drive vehicles and heat buildings wastes much of those fuels' energy as heat, about two-thirds of the primary energy that goes into the global system is lost before it does anything useful.
A growing number of energy analysts point out that the energy transition does not require all that waste energy to be replaced, joule for joule, with renewable energy. Believing otherwise is what Canadian chemical engineer Paul Martin has called the “primary energy fallacy”.
Or as the Oxford professor Jan Rosenow told me, “we don’t need to replace waste”. Rosenow is the lead author of a forthcoming study that attempts to quantify the scale of the primary energy fallacy by modelling a highly electrified global economy running on renewable power. It suggests we could get exactly the same amount of useful energy we have today with about half as much primary energy.
This is mainly because generating electricity from the wind and sun avoids the heat lost in fossil fuel power stations, and electric technologies are far more efficient.
Most of the fuel put into a conventional car, for example, ends up as waste heat instead of moving the car, making internal combustion engine vehicles less efficient than electric ones.
Clean energy expert Michael Liebreich, founder of what is now the Bloomberg New Energy Finance research group, says measuring our economy's energy use in primary energy units "is like measuring nutrition by how many acres are used in agriculture". It also inflates the importance of fossil fuels.
Those fuels grew to dominance last century because they were more efficient than energy sources like wood or horse muscles. It's time they made way for a new generation of less wasteful, and less costly, replacements.
pilita.clark@ft.com
Letters
---
Must we endure yet another account of Ireland's supposedly precarious economic miracle? Jude Webber's Big Read article "Why rich Ireland still feels poor" (November 2) rehearses the familiar litany: unaffordable housing, inadequate infrastructure, multinational dependence, volatile corporation tax and the ever-present prospect that Ireland's extraordinary prosperity might suddenly evaporate. All familiar problems. But where is the context?
Housing affordability and infrastructure delivery are problems across the developed world. These are serious challenges, but their existence
---
Your editorial “The limits of hedging the AI boom” (The FT View, October 28) considers how investors can protect their portfolios from an AI downturn. Much of the money driving the boom is going into chips, data centres and power, so the returns on this infrastructure matter to its suppliers and lenders as well as its owners. But those returns can come under pressure even if demand for AI keeps growing: new technology can make existing equipment less competitive before it has paid for itself.
New generations of equipment can make computing cheaper. That is good news for customers. For a company that borrowed to buy its equipment, it can put returns under pressure. Competition may force it to cut prices, while debt repayments, lease payments and other contractual commitments remain. Higher usage and greater efficiency may offset this pressure, but neither can be taken for granted.
Companies are already revising their estimates of how long equipment will remain useful. Amazon announced in January 2025 it would shorten the useful life assumed in its accounts for some servers and networking equipment from six years to five. It explicitly linked this change to faster technological development, particularly in AI and machine learning.
Cash reserves give a company time to adapt, but do not by themselves ensure that earlier investments will pay off. A sector can grow while some of its companies become less profitable.
Shareholders should therefore ask how long the equipment will take to pay for itself, whether it can still earn enough if computing prices fall, and which financial commitments the company can change as conditions evolve. An investor can be right about the future of a technology and still overestimate the returns on the equipment bought today. Zezag Kaimova Abu Dhabi, UAE
---
Simon Mundy is right to warn about looming copper shortages (Moral Money, October 23). However, not only do credible solutions exist, if harnessed correctly they can fast-track progress towards a circular economy.
Copper is well suited to circularity, which focuses less on increasing production and more on reducing demand and minimising waste. The metal can be recycled repeatedly without losing its essential properties. Industry estimates suggest that two-thirds of the copper produced over the
For more than two generations, Ireland has attracted, retained, lost and replaced successive waves of international investment. Clothing, electronics, computers, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and digital technologies have come, changed and sometimes gone. Yet the economy has continued to attract new industries, technologies and enterprises. Ireland attracted 78 first-time investors in 2025 alone.
tells us remarkably little about the sustainability of Ireland's economic model.
The familiar warnings about what would happen if today's major
If you are not satisfied with the FT's response to your complaint, you can appeal to the FT Editorial Complaints Commissioner: complaints.commissioner@ft.com
BANX

"I PRETENDED TRUMP WAS ON THE BALLOT"
past century remains in productive use. In the US, copper recycled from post-industrial scrap accounted for roughly 40 per cent of apparent consumption (around 920,000 tonnes out of the 2.2mn tonnes) in 2025.
This contribution can be increased and replicated elsewhere. As European telephone networks switch to fibre, redundant copper cables become a strategic resource.
BT alone expects to recover up to 200,000 tonnes from its legacy network through the 2030s. Planned network retirements offer an opportunity to organise recovery before valuable infrastructure is abandoned underground.
Yet recycling cannot close the projected supply gap alone. We must also review specifications that use copper by default. Reducing unnecessary pipe lengths, reviewing oversized plumbing systems and improving electrical layouts can cut material requirements without compromising performance and safety.
The UK's “Vision 2035: Critical Minerals Strategy” report recognises copper's strategic importance, yet the government's “circular economy growth plan” remains unpublished. Ministers should urgently connect the two, working with the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to establish a coherent approach.
Failure to do so will not be cheap and risks supporting criminal recycling networks. Thieves are already targeting power cables, telecommunications and renewable energy installations, costing the UK economy an estimated £500mn annually. By moving quickly and decisively governments can accelerate progress towards a new kind of circular resource security, not only for copper but also for other critical raw materials.
Patrick Schroeder
Senior Research Fellow, Chatham House, London SW1, UK
investors disappeared generally neglect to ask what might replace them. They highlight the possible disappearance of particular companies and ignore Ireland's repeatedly demonstrated capacity to attract their successors. Renewal is as important as attraction and retention.
Of course corporation tax concentration presents risks. Subtracting potentially volatile revenues from future budgets is a useful stress test, but not a complete account of a dynamic economy.
Ireland's genuine difficulty may be that its ability to attract productive investment and people has outstripped
---
Aliya Shibli's report that the number of founders choosing to sell, not scale, is at an eight-year high (FT Money, October 24) will not surprise those of us who back smaller companies.
Sixty per cent of private sector employees, around 17mn people, work in small and medium-sized enterprises in the UK, defined as businesses with fewer than 250 employees. Yet less than one in five is based in London.
At Mercia Asset Management, we invest around £250mn a year into SMEs across the UK through venture capital, development capital and property finance, from our 11 offices nationwide.
We share Prime Minister Andy Burnham's optimism about UK businesses, and it was pleasing to see him engaging so openly with entrepreneurs and investors when I met him recently. I thanked him for his positive attitude and suggested a light-hearted pact: let's create fewer SMEs in the regions, not more.
The point was deliberately provocative. Too many promising British businesses outside London remain small because they struggle to access the capital needed to scale beyond 250 employees. And when they do achieve scale, they are too often bought by overseas acquirers.
The prime minister supported the aim of creating fewer SMEs by empowering them to grow larger.
Scale-up capital is in the eye of the beholder. In the UK's regions, it often means investments of £5mn to £40mn, not £100mn to £500mn. A handful of London success stories should not distract us from the scale of the opportunity elsewhere.
Some relatively modest interventions could rapidly change the landscape and support “good growth in every postcode”. This might comprise regionally targeted scale-up funds backed by government and institutional capital; subsequent crossover funding to prepare companies for an Aim listing; and a functioning Aim market that helps retain the next generation of valuable British businesses.
The government could strengthen Aim by removing restrictions that limit the participation of Venture Capital Trusts in the open market and by encouraging greater institutional investment in Aim small caps.
Do those things, and more regional businesses should be able to scale and remain in the UK. And, by definition, we might finally start creating fewer SMEs, because more of them have grown into larger British businesses. Mark Payton CEO, Mercia Asset Management, Birmingham, UK
Email: letters.editor@ft.com
Include daytime telephone number and full address Corrections: corrections@ft.com
its ability to accommodate them. That is a challenge to our systems of planning, infrastructure delivery and public administration, not proof that the economic model has failed.
Perhaps it is time to retire the mythical creature of Ireland's fluke economy. There is another mythical creature that offers a much better explanation: the Phoenix.
Ireland's economic strength has never depended on keeping every industry alive. It lies in its repeated ability to renew and replace them.
Conor Skehan
Former Chair of the Housing Agency, Malahide, County Dublin, Ireland
---
Jemima Kelly is a little unfair in airily dismissing the journalist and broadcaster Tim Stanley's warning that the UK is on the brink of civil war (“The right’s obsession with ‘civil war’ in Britain”, Opinion, October 26).
Stanley, and some of the others who take to print and the internet with similar views, are what Crane Brinton, in his 1938 classic The Anatomy of Revolution, describes as “professional seers and timid conservatives” performing “one of the great functions of the intellectuals in Western society”, [namely] “to shake ordinary mortals out of their unthinking optimism, and Cassandra has perhaps as much claim as Plato to be founder of a great academic tradition.”
Before Kelly (and we) take too much comfort from Brinton's ensuing caveat ("Cassandra's successors have not quite achieved her unhappy infallibility"), a glance at the harbingers of revolution that Brinton induces from his groundbreaking study – which include government deficits, more than the usual number of complaints over taxation, governmental favouring of one set of economic interests over another, the intensification of social antagonisms, the closing of career opportunities to the talented, and the separation of economic power from political power and social distinction – ought to give us at least some pause for thought.
Charles Mercey
Tellisford, Somerset, UK
---
A word for your photo editors. The report “Toyota poised to unleash its humanoid robots” (Report, November 2), includes a picture in which, according to the caption in the print version of the FT, “a Toyota robot plays basketball”. This is pure anthropomorphism, and evidence of a disturbing trend of attributing human qualities to machines.
Do we need reminding that robots cannot play? Play is not simply a property of what something does (in this case, a robot throws a ball into a basket). As the psychoanalyst DW Winnicott pointed out in his 1971 book Playing and Reality, play is a relationship between subjective and objective reality. Robots may be said to simulate play, but no more than that.
Let's keep the language of subjective experience (including intelligence, but it's probably too late for that) out of our descriptions and discussions of what robots – and AI in general – are all about.
Paul Axelrod
San Francisco, CA, US
---
Martin Wolf Economics
The longer the investment surge continues, the bigger the negative impact is likely to be when it ends

rtificial intelligence has many – mostly far from fully understood – implications for humanity. Among these is something concrete and current: it has launched a huge surge in spending on physical capital, to meet the demand for huge data centres. Indeed, according to a fascinating paper, “Financing the AI Buildout” by Stijn van Nieuwerburgh of the Columbia Business School, spending in the US will average 3.6 per cent of GDP from 2025 to 2032 (inclusive). This would be larger than the average of 2.2 per cent of GDP spent on railways between 1870 and 1890, let alone the 1.1 per cent spent on highways from 1956 to 1973. In fact, it would be the biggest sector-specific investment boom of all.
Some of those earlier transformations were sustained over far longer periods. But this fact makes the AI build-out even more concentrated and so, quite possibly, even more disruptive. Moreover, as van Nieuwerburgh explains, financing the boom is now creating some classic risks, despite the strength of the huge companies (mainly Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Oracle) driving the huge surge in spending.
Moreover, these risks are also macroeconomic. Booms can easily turn into busts, as stock market valuations collapse, companies go bankrupt, lenders lose money and planned investment vanishes. Will this time be different? Ultimately, that depends on the profitability of the new businesses and, in this case, hopes are very high indeed.
As the paper points out, aggregate capital expenditures by the companies listed above rose from \$97bn in 2020, to \$416bn in 2025 and a forecast of \$801bn in 2026. In 2020, the surplus of operating cash flow of these companies over capital spending was \$155bn. In 2025, they still had a cash flow surplus of more than \$187bn. But over these years, the ratio of capital spending to operating cash flows rose from 38 per cent in 2020 to nearly 69 per cent in 2025. Then, in 2026, according to the companies' forecasts, capital spending will exceed cash flow by \$93bn and the ratio of spending to cash flow will hit 113 per cent. Alphabet and Microsoft will still spend a little less than their cash flow. But Oracle's spending will be 138 per cent above it, Amazon's 36 per cent above it and Meta's closet to it.

As a result, ever more complex financial arrangements are being made. Thus, not for the first time, an investment boom is causing an explosion in leverage. While the hyperscalers' direct investment is still important, "the marginal financing model is shifting. Specialized data center developers, REITs, infrastructure funds, and private equity investors increasingly build or acquire facilities and lease capacity to hyperscalers and other large users."
The result, according to the paper, is an increasingly complex and non-transparent financial structure. In particular, it notes, “publicly rated debt represents only a relatively small share of the datacenter financing; much larger volumes are provided through syndicated bank loans and private-credit facilities, for which little information is publicly available."


The AI buildout is forecast to be the biggest in US history
Selected US capital expenditure booms (% of GDP)


Source: Van Nieuwerburgh — 'Financing the AI Buildout' (Brookings, 2026)
Martin Wolf
In sum, “the central issue is not simply that AI infrastructure is exposed to technological and operating risks, but that the sector’s financing structure can transmit and amplify those risks.” This is historically familiar behaviour. Risks for data centre owners include: concentration in the tenants and also in sources of final demand; technological obsolescence and so the need to scrap and replace relatively quickly; and political and operational difficulties involved in making the investments work. Moreover
---
ver, van Nieuwerburgh adds, “Chip designers, cloud providers, data center operators, and infrastructure investors increasingly depend on one another through long-term contracts, strategic investments, and financing arrangements.” This creates fragility.
These are not just issues for the AI sector itself. The investment boom is big enough to have large macroeconomic implications. A paper from the Federal Reserve suggested that spending on computer hardware, software and data centres contributed more than a percentage point to annualised quarter-over-quarter US GDP growth in the first quarter of this year, partially offset by a half a percentage point of GDP increase in net imports in those categories. Both the IMF's World Economic Outlook and a recent Substack from Matt Klein shed light on the international spillovers of the global AI boom, especially on to Taiwanese and South Korean products.
A crucial question, however, is how far the AI mania has infected the stock market, above all in the US. Here some of the vulnerabilities are evident. First, the Magnificent Seven (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla) have, until recently, indeed been pulling the US stock market ever higher. Second, the market is at valuations rarely seen before, with a cyclically adjusted real earnings yield of 2.5 per cent, which is only fractionally above the current real interest rate. This only makes sense if earnings from stocks are about to grow far faster than ever before. In the past, however, whenever earnings have been this low relative to stock prices, the latter have crashed. Is this AI-driven boom, with all its unavoidable uncertainties about future profitability, returns on the huge and rapidly growing investment, and now the elaborate financial engineering, going to be any different?
The longer the investment boom and the associated financial engineering continue, the bigger the negative economic impact is likely to be when it ends. This does not mean that AI itself will fail to be the transformative technology it seems to be, though only a species that adores playing Russian roulette would tolerate a business (Anthropic) whose prospectus says it could create “catastrophic or existential risks to humanity”. New technologies have often triggered stock market manias and investment booms that end in busts. Recent market tremors suggest this could even be happening to AI now. A return to reality will come when it will come. The readiness is all.
martin.wolf@ft.com
---
SOCIETY
Adam Tooze


merican berserk", "speedball capitalism" – thanks to the malign coincidence of Donald Trump and AI hyperscaling we are
living through a conjuncture that defies conventional thinking and challenges us to coin new terms. We need new conceptions that allow us to grasp both the dynamism of America's political economy and its transgressive character.
For our current situation, the Manhattan Project is far too quaint to serve as a useful reference point. The dot.com bubble of the 1990s was an altogether sunnier time. In terms of sheer spending, even the epic railway booms of the late 19th century are being eclipsed. As the full scale of the AI boom becomes clear, these familiar reference points all fall short.
What if we turn to the darker moments of modern history? The most dramatic and violent programmes of modernisation in the 20th century were state-led – Stalinist industrialisation, for instance. Our moment is one in which the US government plays a supportive role.
But private business is in charge. So perhaps the Industrial Revolution is the obvious precursor. Although this is closer to the mark, the accompanying ideology of the Industrial Revolution was classical liberalism — not so today.
As you work your way down the list of possible histories to reference, before long you arrive at a jaw-dropping conclusion. If you are looking for moments of capitalist resource mobilisation that transformed societies and threatened to deliver nothing short of the end of the world for those who stood in their way, it is empire and colonialism
---
that we have to consider, and chattel slavery in particular.
The point, of course, is not to suggest any moral equivalence between our current moment and the horror of the Atlantic slave trade. But what histories of slave societies and the slave trade remind us of is how little room there is for complacency with regard to the guardrails that supposedly constrain the reasonable or the possible in modern society.
The latest histories to perform this service are the Register of British Slave Traders and William Pettigrew's book of the same name. They show us how the uprooting and enslaving of over 12mn African people involved financial innovation and new logistical systems; state power not just mobilised in support of the trade but reinvented around it; cultural production and the media touting a new national myth of innovation and empowerment; economic argument energised by the question of licensed monopoly or free trade, in enslaved people.
As Pettigrew shows us, Atlantic slavery sucked in a substantial part of the British elite. Britons who celebrated their own freedom hitched their national development to the enslaving of others. If Britain, in its rise from second-tier European player to global hegemon, pioneered a new form of Anglo-globalisation, then a modernised slave supply chain was among its first projects.
The very idea of a project as a globe-spanning “venture” was a product of this early modern period. The vision of remaking the future by collective corporate mobilisation, the obsession that echoes down to 21st-century Silicon Valley, took root in Britain in the Tudor and Stuart age. The aim was profit. But the logic was not that of careful maximisation of rate of return. As today, speculation was fundamental to the spirit of venture capital.
When a businessperson tells you they are embarked on a vastly lucrative project that will change the future of humanity, but which comes with a risk of ending the world as we know it, take them at their word.
The South Sea Bubble of 1720 is commonly remembered as the world's first Ponzi scheme. But in focusing on the financial aspects, we obscure its real underpinnings. The South Sea Company did not deal in tulips. It was a gigantic human-trafficking operation, licensed by a monopoly contract with the Spanish Crown to supply tens of thousands of enslaved Africans to Spanish plantations.
If you truly want reference points from the past to enhance your situational awareness of the present, don't flinch from what histories of slavery have to tell us. There is nothing in the combination of finance, enterprise, unfettered technological innovation, radical modernist thinking about the category of the human and state power that should reassure us.

---

Milan's Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II is a haunt of luxury shoppers — Dreamstime
f you are a very wealthy, globally mobile person wondering where to pitch your tent, you are probably keenly focused on two
big – and conceptually opposed – fiscal trends.
On the one hand, there's California and its ilk, concerned by the societal impacts of rising inequality and attempting to impose wealth taxes. On the other, there are the likes of Greece, keen to attract the super-rich – including UK fund manager Chris Rokos – with sweet deals, in the hope that wealth will trickle down.
And then there's Italy, which wants to do both, and thus risks achieving neither. The country has successfully marketed itself as a tax haven for wealthy individuals, including those fleeing London following the scrapping of non-dom rules. Now, however, it is mulling the imposition of an “exit tax” on rich emigrants.
Under the proposed rules sketched out in Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's draft budget law, current residents with more than €800,000 of equity or debt investments worldwide would, should they ever tire of La Dolce Vita, be slapped with a 26 per cent capital gains tax, whether they sell their assets or not.
This is not totally unprecedented. Alongside the US, a number of European countries – including Germany, France and Spain – levy exit taxes on rich individuals. And it removes the incentive to move to a lower-tax jurisdiction simply to sell amassed gains, which is sensible enough.
But Italy is casting the net unusually wide. The €800,000 threshold, which applies to a resident's gross assets rather than deducting borrowings or mortgages, means the tax would enmesh a lot of senior professionals. Spain's version, by contrast, applies to those with over €4mn in assets.
Meloni's plan has other unappealing quirks. Some taxpayers will have to sell assets they might otherwise have held longer, in order to pay their bill. And
---
NatWest is finding some pandemic-era habits hard to shake. Staff complained last month when the UK bank tried to make them spend more time in the office. And while customers may have cooled on some lockdown pursuits — pickling vegetables and baking sourdough bread, say — some financial habits from that era have stuck.
Saving money, for example. A rising household savings ratio suggests British consumers are conserving more income, and giving more thought to where they stick the extra cash. The amount being put aside for a rainy day averaged almost 9 per cent of earnings per quarter in the past three years, official data shows, compared with 5.5 per cent in the years 2017 to 2019.
Separate figures from the Bank of England show deposits in tax-efficient Isas and fixed-term savings accounts surged 70 per cent since the start of 2022, while money in zero-interest accounts rose just 15 per cent.
Borrowing behaviours are also shifting. Credit card debt is at a record high, but the proportion that racks up interest is close to a record low as more people pay off their full balance each month. Executives say mortgagors, likewise, have become more attentive and quick to switch deals when their fixed terms are close to expiring.
This is bad news for banks, which benefit from customer inertia. It adds to the pressure on profitability for large lenders such as NatWest, Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC, already grappling with increased competition for deposits from the likes of JPMorgan's Chase UK at one end and fintechs such as Monzo on the other. NatWest shares fell almost 9 per cent last week when analysts realised its profit margin forecasts were too optimistic.
There is a bright side. Better money management means richer customers. The borrower who routinely pays down their credit card balance is less likely to default if they lose their job, and the customer who saves a little more may gain enough for a house deposit, and become a mortgage customer.
Most of the big banks are skating where the puck is going with efforts to reduce their reliance on net interest margin and grow in areas such as wealth management, which benefits from having wealthier customers.


That's harder work than sucking up cash into interest-free current accounts, but that business model was likely to come under threat in the next few years. AI assistants could soon allow the laziest customer to behave like a follower of the savings best-buy tables. In which case, executives should be grateful for an early glimpse into the future. Better to adapt now than be forgotten like a sourdough starter.
---
Coming down the runway for Europe's travellers: fewer flights at higher prices. Airlines are trying to contain the damage wrought on their profit by persistently high fuel prices. While many are talking about cost cuts, passengers will share the burden too.
Budget airlines face the toughest task. Low-cost champion Ryanair on Monday outlined potential trims it hopes will ease the impact of a €2bn rise in its fuel bill in its next financial year.
Full-service carriers aren't immune, though. Lufthansa, busy integrating Italian carrier ITA as well as taking on a large minority holding in Portugal's TAP, yesterday lowered the high end of its full-year profit forecast. Its fuel costs have risen a fifth, even with financial hedges in place.
John Gapper London Gateway's rise shows if you build it, they will come BUSINESS INSIGHT
As well as high oil prices, airlines are also suffering from a reduction in refining capacity from the Middle East on top of that already lost from sanctions on Russia. Jet fuel in the region has traded above \$1,200 a tonne for the past three months compared with about \$800 before the US attacked Iran in February, making it costly to hedge next year's needs — and risky, should prices fall.
The margin squeeze will be worse for budget airlines, which start out with less room to cut costs. Fuel will soak up 44 per cent of Ryanair's revenue next year, according to analysts polled by Visible Alpha, up from 37 per cent this year. For British Airways owner IAG and for Lufthansa, on the other hand, fuel is expected to be between a quarter and a fifth, unchanged from this year.
Nor can low-cost carriers rely on wealthier premium travellers, who seem strangely tolerant of rising prices; Lufthansa's premium services helped it to an 8 per cent rise in revenue. Capacity cuts are an obvious place to hunker down. But if fuel prices stay roughly where they are, Ryanair would need a 16 per cent jump in revenue next year to offset its extra costs fully, Barclays analysts estimate.
That's a painful rise for its customers when the Irish airline's current average one-way fare is €56. Prices at the budget end have recently been increasing by "mid single digits" according to Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary, who expects them to rise much more as the industry heads into winter, literally and metaphorically. The only consolation is that budget passengers had it so good for so long.
---
1 Positive this skilled tradesperson is biased (7)
2 Firm about communist beliefs (5)
3 At home on sofa I enjoyed being able to carry on eating (9)
4 The wrong time of year unfortunately, so no radishes (4,2,6)
6 When visiting rellies, taking turn about remarkable Square (5)
7 Detailed twisted Christian harangue (9)
8 Motorsport director is given therapeutic toys (7)
11 Fodder one's gathered in for your old rat (7,5)
15 Dotty storyteller collects homework after a break (9)
17 Aged college dons close to retiring support singer (9)
18 Deer in bits OK, escaping horse and donkey (7)
20 Ultimately Famous Five are muddled in head, see (7)
22 Had to carry grain jar (5)
23 Senior ex-army man? (5)\*


Register now
banking.live.ft.com
📰 报刊故事还原:**艺术市场 / 查尔斯顿** —— 查尔斯顿(Sussex郡的艺术家家园)正在启动一项**£15**百万(£15mn)的筹款活动,以配合布卢姆斯伯里集团在英国艺术界的文化复兴。
📰 报刊故事还原:**2026年9月**—**11日**
📰 报刊故事还原:欺诈和投机泡沫与金融业一样古老。1720年的南海泡沫——历史上最臭名昭著的庞氏骗局之一——仅在英国议会通过所谓的《泡沫法案》(意图遏制投机过度)数月后就破裂了。爱德华·钱德勒尔(Edward Chancellor)是《魔鬼抢走最后一分钱》(
每座大型 AI 数据中心每天需蒸发数百万加仑淡水用于冷却芯片,耗电量堪比一座中型城市。在常年干旱、山火频发且电价全美最高的加利福尼亚州,普通居民强烈反对电力公司将升级电网的数亿成本分摊到居民电费账单上,迫使州长纽森立法强制科技巨头自掏腰包并公开水电账本。
巴西 TSE 拥有对大选期间虚假信息与数字渠道的强制关停权。TSE 封禁亲卢拉社交频道事件折射出司法权在极化选举中裁量权边界的巨大争议。
**艺术市场 / 查尔斯顿** —— 查尔斯顿(Sussex郡的艺术家家园)正在启动一项**£15**百万(£15mn)的筹款活动,以配合布卢姆斯伯里集团在英国艺术界的文化复兴。
**2026年9月**—**11日**
欺诈和投机泡沫与金融业一样古老。1720年的南海泡沫——历史上最臭名昭著的庞氏骗局之一——仅在英国议会通过所谓的《泡沫法案》(意图遏制投机过度)数月后就破裂了。爱德华·钱德勒尔(Edward Chancellor)是《魔鬼抢走最后一分钱》(
**社会**